Skip to main content
PMC home page
Chemical Science logoLink to Chemical Science
. 2021 Mar 3;12(15):5505–5510. doi: 10.1039/d1sc00528f

A highly selective decarboxylative deuteration of carboxylic acids†

Nian Li 1, Yunyun Ning 1, Xiaopeng Wu 1, Jin Xie 1,2,✉, Weipeng Li 1,✉, Chengjian Zhu 1,3,✉
PMCID: PMC8179560  PMID: 34163771

Abstract

In this paper, we report a mild and practical method for precise deuteration of aliphatic carboxylic acids by synergistic photoredox and HAT catalysis. The reaction delivers excellent D-incorporation (up to 99%) at predicted sites even in substrates bearing reactive C–H bonds or versatile functional groups. The use of a recirculation reactor with a peristaltic pump supports a scalable preparative ability (up to 50 mmol) under very mild reaction conditions. The practical and precise deuteration of readily available complex carboxylic acids makes this protocol promising for the preparation of deuterium-labelled compounds.

A scalable, practical and general method for precise deuteration of aliphatic carboxylic acids via synergistic photoredox and HAT catalysis has been developed. The use of recirculation reactor achieved the preparative scale deuteration.graphic file with name d1sc00528f-ga.jpg

Introduction

Deuterium-containing organic molecules are being used increasingly in synthetic chemistry, medicinal chemistry and organic materials.1 For example, deutetrabenazine, the first deuterated drug (Austedo) approved in 2017 by the FDA, was developed in part because deuterated drugs can potentially affect the metabolic sites and thus improve the pharmacokinetic properties. To further accelerate the optimization of lead candidates, the development of practical and scalable synthetic methods to precisely incorporate deuterium atoms into different kinds of organic skeletons is very meaningful.2 The most reliable strategies for deuterium incorporation rely on the metalation of the corresponding organic halides3 or of reactive C–H4 bonds to generate organometallic derivatives for subsequent deuteration. Recent efforts have focused on transition metal catalyzed H/D exchange.5 However, most of these methods generally suffer from poor functional group compatibility and uncontrolled chemoselectivity, particularly when the substrates possess weak chemical bonds or competing reactive reaction sites (Fig. 1a).

Fig. 1. Classical deuteration strategies and decarboxylative deuteration approaches. (a) Classical ionic strategies. (b) Pioneering works. (c) This work.

Fig. 1

Open in a new tab

Carboxylic acids are common commercially available feedstocks.6 Decarboxylative strategies enable carboxylic acids to serve as traceless linkers with which to construct C–C and C–X bonds (X = F, Cl, N3).7 In view of the diverse skeletons of carboxylic acids, this type of reaction could significantly enhance the development of a useful library of deuterated organic molecules. In contrast with well-developed radical dehalogenative deuteration of organic halides,8 decarboxylative deuteration represents an elegant access to deuterated molecules from commercially available starting materials. For example, in 2004, Oshima et al.9a reported Pd-catalyzed decarboxylative deuteration of aliphatic carboxylic acids at 250 °C and 5 MPa. In 2010, Hatanaka et al.10 employed a 400 W high-pressure mercury lamp and a stoichiometric photosensitizer for the deuteration of alkyl carboxylic acids. Later, Gooßen et al.9b disclosed Cu or Ag-catalyzed decarboxylative deuteration of (hetero)aromatic carboxylic acids at elevated temperatures. Recently, deuteration of oxime carboxylate was developed by Glorius and coworkers.11

Despite these great efforts, the development of a scalable, practical and site-specific decarboxylative deuteration strategy is still highly desired. Pursuant to our previous work on synergistic catalysis,12 we designed a new strategy to achieve precise deuteration with D2O of a wide array of readily available acids via synergistic thiol and photoredox catalysis (Fig. 1c), efficiently affording structurally diverse deuterated molecules with up to 99% deuterium incorporation. We have explored the practicality of the method via recirculation reactors, developing a protocol which is easily scalable (up to 50 mmol) in laboratories.

Results and discussion

The proposed mechanism of decarboxylative deuteration is illustrated in Fig. 2a. Upon absorbing visible light, the photo-excited PC* with a high redox potential can accept an electron from a carboxylate anion and generate an alkyl radical (4) by decarboxylation.13 Due to the stronger BDE of the O–D bond (118 kcal mol−1) in D2O than that of normal C(sp3)–H bonds (ca. 100–110 kcal mol−1),14 direct hydrogen atom transfer between an alkyl radical (4) and D2O is thermodynamically unfavorable.15 Taking advantage of the pioneering work on radical deuteration,12a,b we used a thiol as the HAT catalyst. In the presence of excess D2O, it will undergo rapid H/D exchange to form RS–D because its pKa value will be lower than that of water (pKa = 32).16 Subsequently, the alkyl radical (4) will enter into a HAT process with R–SD (5) to furnish the desired product (3) and a thiyl radical (6). This can further accept an electron from the photocatalytic system to complete the HAT catalysis and photoredox cycle.

Fig. 2. (a) Mechanistic hypothesis. (b) Cyclic Voltammetry (CV) experiments.

Fig. 2

Open in a new tab

As shown in Fig. 2b, the alkyl carboxylic acid (1a) does not have an oxidation potential in the range of 0–2 V, but a significant peak at 0.74 V vs. SCE (the oxidation potential of a carboxylate) is seen when a stoichiometric inorganic base, especially CsOH is added. It was presumed that the use of CsOH could benefit the formation of cesium carboxylate, which can undergo single electron oxidation and be decarboxylated. Radical trapping experiments with 2,2,6,6-tetramethylpiperidinooxy (TEMPO) and EPR results showed that the radical pathway was highly likely, consistent with the proposed mechanism shown in Fig. 2a.

Initially, we selected cesium 4-(4-methoxyphenyl)butanoate (1a-Cs) as a model substrate, and it is readily available from the corresponding carboxylic acid in almost quantitative yield (Table 1). The optimized conditions include the use of 1 mol% [Ir(dF(CF3)ppy)2(dtbbpy)]PF6 [PC-III, 1/2Ered(*IrIII/IrII) = +1.21 V vs. SCE]17 as the photocatalyst, thiol (2a) as the HAT catalyst, DCM/D2O as the mixed solvent and irradiation of blue LEDs at ambient temperature (entry 1). The reaction delivered the desired 1-methoxy-4-(propyl-3-d)benzene (3a) in 75% yield and with up to 96% deuterium incorporation. The substrate cesium 4-(4-methoxyphenyl)butanoate (1a) has a weak benzylic C–H site, but the site remained intact during the decarboxylative deuteration. To our knowledge, C–H sites of this type are challenging in H/D exchange strategies.5c If sodium or potassium salts were used instead of cesium carboxylate, it was found that the D-incorporation was notably decreased (entries 2 and 3). However, the formation of the corresponding cesium carboxylate in situ from a carboxylic acid and CsOH gives a moderate yield and D-incorporation (entry 3). The use of other photocatalysts such as PC-I or PC-II and thiols (2b–2c) reduces the reaction efficiency (entries 5–9). Control experiments suggest that the photocatalyst, thiol HAT catalyst and light irradiation are key factors contributing to the success of the reaction (entries 10 and 11). On the other hand, we found that aliphatic acids such as 2-(4-(benzyloxy)phenyl)acetic acid (1b), which are stabilized by heteroatomic or aryl substitution, can directly react under modified optimized conditions when using Mes-Acr-Me (PC-I) as shown in Fig. 3 (see the ESI† for optimization details). This can precede the precise decarboxylative deuteration and afford the desired product (3b) in 97% yield and 95% D-incorporation. We envisioned that the strong oxidative ability of photoexcited *Mes-Acr-Me [1/2Ered(*PC/PC˙−) = +2.08 V vs. SCE]18 would facilitate the SET oxidation of carboxylic acid in the presence of an organic base. Interestingly, we found that the initial reaction rate of this decarboxylative deuteration was heavily light-dependent since a dramatically decreased rate was observed when only one LED lamp was used rather than two lamps (see the ESI† for details). This encouraged us to use a recirculation reactor to address the efficiency of the reaction.

Optimization of the reaction conditionsa.

graphic file with name d1sc00528f-u1.jpg
Entry Variation of standard conditions Yieldb D-Inc.c
1 None 75% 96%
2 With 1a-Nad 75% 77%
3 With 1a-Ke 75% 83%
4 4-(4-Methoxyphenyl)butanoic acid and CsOHf 57% 60%
5 PC-I instead of PC-III 4% —
6 PC-II instead of PC-III 3% —
7 2b instead of 2a Trace —
8 2c instead of 2a 23% 96%
9 2d instead of 2a 14% 96%
10 Without PC-III or light N.D. —
11 Without 2a 5% —
graphic file with name d1sc00528f-u2.jpg
Open in a new tab
a

1a-Cs (0.2 mmol), PC-III (1 mol%), 2a (10 mol%), DCM/D2O (4 : 1, v/v; 2 mL, 110 eq. of D2O), 45 W blue LEDs, room temperature, 18 h.

b

Measured by GC using acetophenone as the internal standard due to the high volatility.

c

Deuterium incorporation was determined by HRMS-ESI.

d

Sodium 4-(4-methoxyphenyl)butanoate.

e

Potassium 4-(4-methoxyphenyl)butanoate.

f

CsOH (2.0 equiv.) as the base. DCM = dichloromethane, N.D. = not detected.

Fig. 3. Modified standard conditions for benzylic acids. Reaction conditions: 1b (0.2 mmol), Mes-Acr-Me PC-I (2 mol%), 2a (10 mol%), 2,4,6-collidine (1.0 equiv.), DCM/D2O (4 : 1, v/v; 2 mL, 110 eq. of D2O), 45 W blue LEDs, ambient temperature, 10 h. Yield of the isolated product is shown. The deuterium incorporation was determined by 1H NMR analysis.

Fig. 3

Open in a new tab

With the optimized decarboxylative deuteration conditions in hand, we investigated the scope of the aliphatic carboxylic acids. As shown in Fig. 4, a wide variety of primary, secondary and tertiary carboxylic acid derivatives can smoothly undergo the decarboxylative deuteration, affording the products (3c–3s) in moderate to good yields with excellent (up to 99%) D-incorporation. The benzylic and α-heteroatom carboxylic acids (3c–3e, 3g–3k, 3n, 3q and 3r) can be directly employed under optimized reaction conditions A with Mes-Acr-Me (PC-I) as the photocatalyst. The reactive benzylic and α-amino C–H bonds, for which H/D exchange under photocatalysis has been reported,2a were not structurally affected by the reaction. The unactivated cesium carboxylates were employed under optimized conditions B, affording the desired products (3f, 3l, 3m, 3o, 3p and 3s) in satisfactory yields and with good D-incorporation. As shown in Fig. 4, the decarboxylative deuteration protocol has good functional group compatibility. Several relatively sensitive but versatile functional groups, such as a weak benzylic C–H bond (3c, 3d, 3l–3n and 3q), an α-amino C–H bond (3d, 3l–3n, 3q and 3u), heteroaryl (3j and 3k), boronic ester (3e), ketone (3o) or strained small rings (3r), survived the conditions well, which suggests promising applications in synthetic and medicinal chemistry. The synthetic robustness of the reaction was further illustrated by the decarboxylative deuteration of complex carboxylic acids such as erdosteine (3u), ambrisentan (3y), gemfibrozil (3aa) and oleanic acid (3cc). The resulting deuterated products (3t–3ee) are difficult to prepare from other available starting materials, such as organic halides which are usually prepared from acids by reduction and subsequent halogenation under harsh conditions. However, aromatic acids are unsuccessful examples in this decarboxylative protocol possibly because the radical decarboxylation of aromatic substrates is a kinetically less favoured pathway.11

Fig. 4. Scope of the decarboxylative deuteration. aStandard conditions A: aliphatic acids 1 (0.2 mmol), PC-I (2 mol%), 2a (10 mol%), 2,4,6-collidine (1.0 equiv.), DCM/D2O (4 : 1, v/v, 2 mL), blue LEDs, 10–20 h. bStandard conditions B: cesium carboxylate (0.2 mmol), PC-III (1 mol%), 2a (10 mol%), DCM/D2O (4 : 1, v/v, 2 mL, 110 eq. of D2O), 45 W blue LEDs, 10–20 h. cThese products are readily volatile and yields are determined by GC. Isolated yields are shown and the deuterium incorporation ratio was determined by 1H NMR spectroscopy (<95% D) or HRMS (>95% D).

Fig. 4

Open in a new tab

Although several important radical deuteration syntheses of various compounds have been established, a scalable and practical strategy remains a problem.8 Flow chemistry has significant advantages in terms of scalability, safety and productivity, and has been recently applied in photocatalyzed organic transformations.19 In general, the mesoscale two-phase photoreaction could be improved through the use of a flow reactor setup, allowing for a larger illumination area and liquid–liquid interfacial area. Consequently, we sought to develop scalable decarboxylative deuteration in flow reactors. However, we immediately found that the use of a continuous-flow micro-tubing reactor employing a syringe pump to deliver the reaction liquid decreased the D-incorporation ratio of products, such as 3b, to less than 40%. Inspired by the well-established continuous-flow technology, we designed a batch recirculation reactor with a peristaltic pump to transfer the reaction mixture (the detailed setup is shown in the ESI†); the enhanced mixing effect and mass transfer between two phases of our equipment improved the interfacial area20 of DCM and D2O, and this increased the D-incorporation ratio of 3b from 37% to 95% (see the ESI† for details).

As shown in Fig. 5, the decarboxylative deuteration assisted by our recirculation arrangement could be scaled up with 5.0 mmol of carboxylic acid. A wide range of aliphatic carboxylic acids are effective substrates, affording the desired products (3ff–3uu) in acceptable yields without decreasing the D-incorporation or the chemoselectivity. Furthermore, although the cesium carboxylate is not soluble well in recirculation reactors, it can also furnish the decarboxylation product (3hh) in 71% yield and 97% D-incorporation upon addition of 18-crown-6 as an additive with 0.5 mol% photocatalyst. The use of recirculation reactors can allow for 50.0 mmol scale-up ability to produce 3b (8.6 g) and 3vv (13.0 g) without compromising the reaction efficiency and D-incorporation (>95%). With this protocol, we were able to easily prepare 18 kinds of different deuterated compounds on a 2–50 mmol scale from readily available starting materials under mild reaction conditions.

Fig. 5. Scalable decarboxylative deuteration of carboxylic acids. Standard conditions: 1 (5.0 mmol), PC-I (2 mol%), 2a (10 mol%), 2,4,6-collidine (1.0 equiv.), DCM/D2O (4 : 1, v/v, 25 mL), blue LEDs, peristalsis rate = 30 mL min−1, 8–16 h. aCesium carboxylate (2.0 mmol), PC-III (0.5 mol%), 2a (5 mol%), 18-crown-6 (1.0 equiv.), DCM/D2O (4 : 1, v/v, 10 mL), blue LEDs, peristalsis rate = 80 mL min−1, 9 h. bYields are determined by GC due to the volatility. c1 (50.0 mmol), PC-I (1 mol%), 2a (5 mol%), 2,4,6-collidine (1.0 equiv.), DCM (80 mL), D2O (22.0 equiv., 20.9 mL), 45 W blue LEDs, peristalsis rate = 80 mL min−1, 16 h.

Fig. 5

Open in a new tab

Conclusions

In conclusion, we have developed a scalable, practical and precise decarboxylative deuteration of aliphatic carboxylic acids via synergistic photoredox and HAT catalysis with D2O as the deuterium source. A great number of structurally diverse deuterated organic molecules have been obtained with up to 99% D-incorporation from commercially available carboxylates, including a wide range of complex carboxylic acids. We have also explored this method on a preparative scale with a recirculation reactor. This provides a scalable and efficient method for the synthesis of deuterated compounds.

Author contributions

J. X., W. L. and N. L. conceived and designed the project. N. L., Y. N. and X. W. performed, analyzed and discussed the experimental data. J. X. wrote the manuscript with input from all authors and discussed the manuscript with C. Z.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts to declare.

Supplementary Material

SC-012-D1SC00528F-s001

Acknowledgments

We thank the National Natural Science Foundation of China (22001117, 21971108, 21971111 and 21732003), the Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province (Grant No. BK20190006 and BK20190285), and the Foundation of Advanced Catalytic Engineering Research Center of the Ministry of Education. Shan Gao, Yubo Pang, Chenglong Ji, and Rehanguli Ruzi are warmly acknowledged for reproducing experimental procedures for products 3b, 3z, 3kk and 3hh.

†

Electronic supplementary information (ESI) available. See DOI: 10.1039/d1sc00528f

References

  1. (a) Gant T. G. J. Med. Chem. 2014;57:3595. doi: 10.1021/jm4007998. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Atzrodt J. Derdau V. Kerr W. J. Reid M. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2018;57:1758. doi: 10.1002/anie.201704146. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Recent examples: ; (a) Loh Y. Y. Nagao K. Hoover A. J. Hesk D. Rivera N. R. Colletti S. L. Davies I. W. MacMillan D. W. C. Science. 2017;358:1182. doi: 10.1126/science.aap9674. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Geng H. Chen X. Gui J. Zhang Y. Shen Z. Qian P. Chen J. Zhang S. Wang W. Nat. Catal. 2019;2:1071. doi: 10.1038/s41929-019-0370-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (c) Spiegel D. A. Wiberg K. B. Schacherer L. N. Medeiros M. R. Wood J. L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005;127:12513. doi: 10.1021/ja052185l. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (d) Liu X. Liu R. Qiu J. Cheng X. Li G. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2020;59:13962. doi: 10.1002/anie.202005765. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (e) Koniarczyk J. L. Hesk D. Overgard A. Davies I. W. McNally A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2018;140:1990. doi: 10.1021/jacs.7b11710. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (f) Zhu N. Su M. Wan W. M. Li Y. Bao H. Org. Lett. 2020;22:991. doi: 10.1021/acs.orglett.9b04536. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (g) Puleo T. R. Strong A. J. Bandar J. S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2019;141:1467. doi: 10.1021/jacs.8b12874. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (h) Wang M. Zhao Y. Zhao Y. Shi Z. Sci. Adv. 2020;6:eaba0946. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.aba0946. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (i) Wang X. Zhu M. H. Schuman D. P. Zhong D. Wang W. Y. Wu L. Y. Liu W. Stoltz B. M. Liu W. B. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2018;140:10970. doi: 10.1021/jacs.8b07597. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (j) Kuang Y. Cao H. Tang H. Chew J. Chen W. Shi X. Wu J. Chem. Sci. 2020;11:8912. doi: 10.1039/d0sc02661a. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (k) Zhou R. Li J. Cheo H. W. Chua R. Zhan G. Hou Z. Wu J. Chem. Sci. 2019;10:7340. doi: 10.1039/c9sc02818h. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Selected examples of ionic dehalogenative deuteration: ; (a) Harrowven D. C. Guy I. L. Nunn M. I. T. Chem. Commun. 2004:1966. doi: 10.1039/b406103a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Alonso F. Beletskaya I. P. Yus M. Chem. Rev. 2002;102:4009. doi: 10.1021/cr0102967. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (c) Bailey W. F. Patricia J. J. J. Organomet. Chem. 1988;352:1. [Google Scholar]; (d) Yus M. Chem. Soc. Rev. 1996;25:155. [Google Scholar]; (e) Reich H. J. J. Org. Chem. 2012;77:5471. doi: 10.1021/jo3005155. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Recent reviews: ; (a) Atzrodt J. Derdau V. Kerr W. J. Reid M. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2018;57:3022. doi: 10.1002/anie.201708903. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Atzrodt J. Derdau V. Fey T. Zimmermann J. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2007;46:7744. doi: 10.1002/anie.200700039. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (c) Junk T. Catallo W. J. Chem. Soc. Rev. 1997;26:401. [Google Scholar]; (d) Valero M. Derdau V. J. Labelled Compd. Radiopharm. 2020;63:266. doi: 10.1002/jlcr.3783. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Selected recent examples of transition metal catalyzed H/D exchange: ; (a) Valero M. Weck R. Gussregen S. Atzrodt J. Derdau V. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2018;57:8159. doi: 10.1002/anie.201804010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Neubert L. Michalik D. Bahn S. Imm S. Neumann H. Atzrodt J. Derdau V. Holla W. Beller M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012;134:12239. doi: 10.1021/ja3041338. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (c) Atzrodt J. Derdau V. Fey T. Zimmermann J. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2007;46:7744. doi: 10.1002/anie.200700039. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. (a) Rodríguez N. Goossen L. J. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2011;40:5030. doi: 10.1039/c1cs15093f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Gallezot P. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2012;41:1538. doi: 10.1039/c1cs15147a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Selected examples of decarboxylation: ; (a) Yin F. Wang Z. Li Z. Li C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012;134:10401. doi: 10.1021/ja3048255. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) He J. Chen G. Zhang B. Li Y. Chen J.-R. Xiao W.-J. Liu F. Li C. Chem. 2020;6:1149. [Google Scholar]; (c) Xuan J. Zhang Z. G. Xiao W.-J. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2015;54:15632. doi: 10.1002/anie.201505731. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (d) Johnston C. P. Smith R. T. Allmendinger S. MacMillan D. W. Nature. 2016;536:322. doi: 10.1038/nature19056. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (e) Xia H.-D. Li Z.-L. Gu Q.-S. Dong X.-Y. Fang J.-H. Du X.-Y. Wang L.-L. Liu X.-Y. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2020;59:16926. doi: 10.1002/anie.202006317. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (f) Liu X.-G. Zhou C.-J. Lin E. Han X.-L. Zhang S.-S. Li Q. Wang H. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2018;57:13096. doi: 10.1002/anie.201806799. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (g) Fu M.-C. Shang R. Zhao B. Wang B. Fu Y. Science. 2019;363:1429. doi: 10.1126/science.aav3200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (h) Varenikov A. Shapiro E. Gandelman M. Chem. Rev. 2021;121:412. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.0c00813. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (i) Weaver J. D. Recio III A. Grenning A. J. Tunge J. A. Chem. Rev. 2011;111:1846. doi: 10.1021/cr1002744. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Selected examples of recent radical deuteration: ; (a) Liu C. Chen Z. Su C. Zhao X. Gao Q. Ning G. H. Zhu H. Tang W. Leng K. Fu W. Tian B. Peng X. Li J. Xu Q. H. Zhou W. Loh K. P. Nat. Commun. 2018;9:80. doi: 10.1038/s41467-017-02551-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Dong Y. Su Y. Du L. Wang R. Zhang L. Zhao D. Xie W. ACS Nano. 2019;13:10754. doi: 10.1021/acsnano.9b05523. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (c) Liu C. Han S. Li M. Chong X. Zhang B. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2020;59:18527. doi: 10.1002/anie.202009155. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. (a) Matsubara S. Yokota Y. Oshima K. Org. Lett. 2004;6:2071. doi: 10.1021/ol0492602. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Gooßen L. Rudzki M. Alcalde-Aragonés A. Dzik W. Rodríguez N. Synthesis. 2012;44:184. [Google Scholar]
  10. Itou T. Yoshimi Y. Nishikawa K. Morita T. Okada Y. Ichinose N. Hatanaka M. Chem. Commun. 2010;46:6177. doi: 10.1039/c0cc01464h. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Patra T. Mukherjee S. Ma J. Strieth-Kalthoff F. Glorius F. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2019;58:10514. doi: 10.1002/anie.201904671. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. (a) Zhang M. Yuan X. A. Zhu C. Xie J. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2019;58:312. doi: 10.1002/anie.201811522. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Xu W. Wang W. Liu T. Xie J. Zhu C. Nat. Commun. 2019;10:4867. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-12844-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (c) Xu W. Ma J. Yuan X. A. Dai J. Xie J. Zhu C. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2018;57:10357. doi: 10.1002/anie.201805927. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (d) Zhu C. Dong J. Liu X. Gao L. Zhao Y. Xie J. Li S. Zhu C. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2020;59:12817. doi: 10.1002/anie.202005749. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (e) Zhou N. Yuan X.-A. Zhao Y. Xie J. Zhu C. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2018;57:3990. doi: 10.1002/anie.201800421. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (f) Zhang M. Xie J. Zhu C. Nat. Commun. 2018;9:3517. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-06019-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (g) Han J. Xie J. Chem. 2020;6:1053. [Google Scholar]; (h) Ruzi R. Liu K. Zhu C. Xie J. Nat. Commun. 2020;11:3312. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-17224-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (i) Liao Q. Xu W. Huang X. Ke C. Zhang Q. Xi K. Xie J. Sci. China: Chem. 2020;63:707. [Google Scholar]
  13. (a) Zhou Q. Q. Guo W. Ding W. Wu X. Chen X. Lu L. Q. Xiao W.-J. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2015;54:11196. doi: 10.1002/anie.201504559. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Griffin J. D. Zeller M. A. Nicewicz D. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2015;137:11340. doi: 10.1021/jacs.5b07770. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (c) Bloom S. Liu C. Kölmel D. K. Qiao J. X. Zhang Y. Poss M. A. Ewing W. R. MacMillan D. W. C. Nat. Chem. 2018;10:205. doi: 10.1038/nchem.2888. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Denisov E. T. Tumanov V. E. Russ. Chem. Rev. 2005;74:825. [Google Scholar]
  15. Ruscic B. Wagner A. F. Harding L. B. Asher R. L. Feller D. Dixon D. A. Peterson K. A. Song Y. Qian X. Ng C.-Y. Liu J. Chen W. Schwenke D. W. J. Phys. Chem. A. 2002;106:2727. [Google Scholar]
  16. Bordwell F. G. Acc. Chem. Res. 1988;21:456. [Google Scholar]
  17. (a) Prier C. K. Rankic D. A. MacMillan D. W. C. Chem. Rev. 2013;113:5322. doi: 10.1021/cr300503r. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Xie J. Jin H. Hashmi A. S. K. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2017;46:5193. doi: 10.1039/c7cs00339k. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Romero N. A. Nicewicz D. A. Chem. Rev. 2016;116:10075. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.6b00057. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Selected examples of continuous-flow photoreactions: ; (a) Cai B., Cheo H. W., Liu T. and Wu J., Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 10.1002/anie.202010710 [DOI]; (b) Jia P. Li Q. Poh W. C. Jiang H. Liu H. Deng H. Wu J. Chem. 2020;6:1766. [Google Scholar]; (c) Seo H. Liu A. Jamison T. F. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2017;139:13969. doi: 10.1021/jacs.7b05942. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (d) Ushakov D. B. Gilmore K. Kopetzki D. McQuade D. T. Seeberger P. H. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2014;53:557. doi: 10.1002/anie.201307778. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (e) Straathof N. J. W. Su Y. Hessel V. Noël T. Nat. Protoc. 2016;11:10. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2015.113. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (f) Lima F. Kabeshov M. A. Tran D. N. Battilocchio C. Sedelmeier J. Sedelmeier G. Schenkel B. Ley S. V. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2016;55:14085. doi: 10.1002/anie.201605548. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (g) Laudadio G. Govaerts S. Wang Y. Ravelli D. Koolman H. F. Fagnoni M. Djuric S. W. Noël T. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2018;57:4078. doi: 10.1002/anie.201800818. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Cambie D. Bottecchia C. Straathof N. J. Hessel V. Noël T. Chem. Rev. 2016;116:10276. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.5b00707. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

SC-012-D1SC00528F-s001
SC-012-D1SC00528F-s001.pdf (10MB, pdf)

Articles from Chemical Science are provided here courtesy of Royal Society of Chemistry

RESOURCES