Skip to main content
Current Developments in Nutrition logoLink to Current Developments in Nutrition
. 2021 Jun 7;5(Suppl 2):152. doi: 10.1093/cdn/nzab035_060

Personalized Nutrition Advice Reduces Intake of Discretionary Foods and Beverages: Findings From the Food4Me Randomized Controlled Trial

Katherine Livingstone 1, Carlos Celis-Morales 2, Santiago Navas-Carretero 3, Rodrigo San-Cristobal 4, Hannah Forster 5, Clara Woolhead 6, Clare O'Donovan 7, George Moschonis 8, Yannis Manios 9, Iwona Traczyk 10, Thomas Gundersen 11, Christian Drevon 12, Cyril Marsaux 13, Rosalind Fallaize 14, Anna Macready 15, Hannelore Daniel 16, Wim Saris 17, Julie Lovegrove 18, Mike Gibney 19, Eileen Gibney 20, Marianne Walsh 21, Lorraine Brennan 22, J Alfredo Martinez 23, John Mathers 24
PMCID: PMC8182148

Abstract

Objectives

This study aimed to examine changes in intake of discretionary foods and beverages following a personalized nutrition intervention using two national classifications for discretionary foods.

Methods

Participants were recruited into a 6-month RCT across seven European countries (Food4Me) and were randomized to receive generalized dietary advice (Control) or one of three levels of personalized nutrition advice (based on dietary, phenotypic and genotypic information). Dietary intake from a FFQ was used to determine change between baseline and month 6 in (i) % energy, % contribution to total fat, SFA, total sugars and salt and (ii) contribution (%) made by sweets and snacks to intake of total fat, SFA, sugars and salt from discretionary foods and beverages, defined by Food Standards Scotland (FSS) and the Australian Dietary Guidelines (ADG).

Results

A total of 1270 adults (40.9 (SD 13.0) years; 57% female) completed the intervention. At month 6, percentage sugars from FSS discretionary items was lower in personalized nutrition vs control (19.0 ± 0.37 vs 21.1 ± 0.65; P = 0.005). Percentage energy (31.2 ± 0.59 vs 32.7 ± 0.59; P = 0.031), % total fat (31.5 ± 0.37 vs 33.3 ± 0.65; P = 0.021), SFA (36.0 ± 0.43 vs 37.8 ± 0.75; P = 0.034) and sugars (31.7 ± 0.44 vs 34.7 ± 0.78; P < 0.001) from ADG discretionary items were lower in personalized nutrition vs control. The % contribution of sugars from sweets and snacks was lower in personalized nutrition vs control (19.1 ± 0.36 vs 21.5 ± 0.63; P < 0.001). At 3 months, effects were consistent for ADG discretionary items, while there was no significant differences in personalized nutrition vs control for FSS discretionary items.

Conclusions

Compared with generalized dietary advice, personalized nutrition advice achieved greater reductions in intake of discretionary foods and beverages when the classification included all foods high in fat, added sugars and salt. Future personalized nutrition strategies may be used to target intake of discretionary foods and beverages.

Funding Sources

European Commission Food, Agriculture, Fisheries and Biotechnology Theme of the Seventh Framework Programme for Research and Technological Development [265494]. KML is supported by a NHMRC Emerging Leadership Fellowship (APP1173803).


Articles from Current Developments in Nutrition are provided here courtesy of American Society for Nutrition

RESOURCES