ABSTRACT
Photothermal therapy (PTT) has attracted broad attention as a promising method for cancer therapy with less severe side effects than conventional radiation therapy, chemotherapy and surgical resection. PTT relies on the photoconversion capacity of photothermal agents (PTAs), and a wide variety of nanomaterials have been employed as PTAs for cancer therapy due to their excellent photothermal properties. The PTAs are systematically or locally administered and become enriched in cancer cells to increase ablation efficiency. In recent years, PTAs and three-dimensional scaffolds have been hybridized to realize the local delivery of PTAs for the repeated ablation of cancer cells. Meanwhile, the composite scaffolds can stimulate the reconstruction and regeneration of the functional tissues and organs after ablation of cancer cells. A variety of composite scaffolds of photothermal nanomaterials have been prepared to combine the advantages of different modalities to maximize their therapeutic efficacy with minimal side effects. The synergistic effects make the composite scaffolds attractive for biomedical applications. This review summarizes these latest advances and discusses the future prospects.
KEYWORDS: Nanoparticles, magnetic nanoparticles, gold nanoparticles, black phosphorus nanosheets, composite scaffolds, photothermal therapy, tissue engineering
CLASSIFICATIONS: 30 Bio-inspired and biomedical materials; 211 Scaffold / Tissue engineering/Drug delivery; 102 Porous / Nanoporous / Nanostructured materials, photothermal therapy, tissue regeneration
Graphical abstract
1. Introduction
Currently, cancer is a major health problem due to its high morbidity and mortality [1]. Traditional treatments of cancers include surgical resection, chemotherapy, and radiation therapy [2]. However, these treatments have some associated problems. Chemotherapy and radiation therapy involve high doses of anticancer drugs and radiation, which lead to side effects and serious effects on the overall health of patients [3]. Surgery cannot remove all tumor cells from the primary lesion area and may cause tissue defects that are difficult to self-heal [4]. Photothermal therapy (PTT) is an effective treatment that has been widely considered in recent years. It uses the photo-heat conversion of photothermal agents (PTAs) to produce a hyperthermic effect to destroy cancer cells, and has the advantage of less severe side effects [5]. PTAs are the critical factor in PTT, and the choice and use of the PTAs is important for the success of PTT. Generally, PTAs in the near-infrared biowindows (NIR-I: 650–1000 nm and NIR-II: 1000–1700 nm), with the features of weak damage to tissues, low self-absorption and high tissue penetration, are suitable for tumor treatments [6–8]. According to the chemical composition of PTAs, they can be classified into two categories: organic and inorganic nanomaterials [9]. Organic PTAs are widely used in PTT and include small-molecule dyes and polymer-based nanoparticles (NPs). Inorganic nanomaterials such as carbon nanomaterials, gold nanoparticles, transition metal nanomaterials, and black phosphorus have attracted extensive concern in cancer therapy owing to their unique properties and functions, such as high photothermal conversion efficiency (PCE) and remarkable photothermal stability [10–13].
Although various nanomaterials as PTAs exhibit many excellent properties for PTT applications, they also have some drawbacks [14,15]. When these nanomaterials are administered systematically, they predominantly accumulate in the liver or spleen rather than in cancers [16,17]. When injected locally, most of the nanomaterials are susceptible to rapid removal because they are too small to remain in the interstitial spaces of tissues, which greatly limits the possibility of repeated treatment [18,19]. Additionally, after tumor ablation, especially in breast, bone and skin cancers, there are tumor-induced tissue defects in the area that do not heal easily without additional intervention [20].
With the rapid development of scaffolding technology, the use of three-dimensional (3D) porous scaffolds as carriers of PTAs has aroused great interest in cancer therapy and tissue regeneration [21,22]. In these scaffold-based carriers, the PTAs are incorporated into the scaffold to obtain PTA-integrated composite scaffolds, which enables the PTAs to achieve better photothermal effects in vivo [23,24]. In addition, this kind of composite scaffold can not only enable the ablation of cancer cells by PTAs but also support the adhesion and proliferation of normal cells to repair tumor-induced tissue defects because of the similarity of the scaffold to the extracellular matrix (ECM) structure [25,26]. Additionally, the functional modification of composite scaffolds can further mimic the ECM and facilitate new tissue regeneration [27–29].
This review highlights the latest advances in PTAs for PTT by focusing on organic-based materials, carbon-based materials, metal-based materials, MXenes, and black phosphorus (Figure 1). Further, the integration of various types of nanomaterials with 3D scaffolds for simultaneous cancer therapy and tissue regeneration is summarized. The future prospects and challenges of photothermal nanomaterials and their composite scaffolds are discussed.
2. Photothermal agents
A large number of studies have explored the design and preparation of PTAs with high PCE, excellent photostability and good biocompatibility over the past few years [30]. Some typical nanomaterials that are used as PTAs are summarized in Table 1, together with their characteristics and biomedical applications. They can be classified into organic and inorganic PTAs.
Table 1.
Type of PTAs | Composition | Size | Irradiation conditions |
Cancer cell type | Combined therapy | Application | Ref. | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Wavelength | Power and time | |||||||
ICG | ICG@PLGA/ cancer cell membrane |
200.4 nm | 808 nm | 1.0 W cm−2, 5 min | MCF-7 cells | PTT | Breast cancer therapy | [36] |
PDA | Borate coordination polymer coated PDA/PEGylation DOX |
200.0 nm | 808 nm | 1.5 W cm−2, 10 min | MCF-7 cells | PTT/chemotherapy | Breast cancer therapy | [39] |
PPy | PPy/PVA | 46.0 nm | 808 nm | 6.0 W cm−2, 5 min | HeLa cells | PTT | Cervical cancer therapy | [41] |
Semiconducting polymer | PDCDT/PEG | 56.0 nm | 1064 nm | 1.0 W cm−2, 10 min | 4T1 cells | PTT | Breast cancer therapy | [45] |
Graphene | PEGylated Graphene | 10–50 nm | 808 nm | 2.0 W cm−2, 5 min | 4T1 cells | PTT | Breast cancer therapy | [50] |
rGO | PEGylated rGO | 18.8 nm | 808 nm | 15.3 W cm−2, 8 min | U87MG cells | PTT | Glioma therapy | [52] |
SWCNTs | SWCNT@ mesoporous silica/PEG/DOX | 15–25 nm (thickness) 100–300 nm (length) |
808 nm | 0.5 W cm−2, 20 min | 4T1 cells | PTT/chemotherapy | Breast cancer therapy | [56] |
Gold nanostars | Au nanostars coated BSA/MMP2/IR-780 iodide | 121.5 nm | 808 nm | 0.8 W cm−2, 5 min | A549 cells | PTT/PDT | Lung cancer therapy | [75] |
Gold nanocages | DOX loaded AuNC@HA | 50 nm | 808 nm | 1.0 W cm−2, 5 min | MDA-MB-231 cells | PTT/chemotherapy | Breast cancer therapy | [76] |
CuS | Flower-like CuS/PVP | 50 nm (thickness) 500–800 nm (length) |
980 nm | 0.51 W cm−2, 10 min | HeLa cells | PTT | Cervical cancer therapy | [84] |
MoS2 | MoS2-PEG/DOX | 50.0 nm | 808 nm | 0.56 W cm−2, 20 min | 4T1 cells | PTT/chemotherapy | Breast cancer therapy | [88] |
WS2 | Gd3+/WS2/PEG | 80.0 nm | 808 nm | 0.5 W cm−2, 10 min | 4T1 cells | PTT/radiotherapy | Breast cancer therapy | [91] |
Fe3O4 | Perfluorohexane @PLGA/Fe3O4 | 347 nm | 780–2800 nm | 1.5 W cm−2, 12 min | SKOV3 cells | PTT | Ovarian cancer therapy | [99] |
Fe3O4 nanorings | PEGylated Fe3O4 nanorings | 70 nm (outer diameter) | Magnetic field | 30 kA/m, 365 kHz, 10 min | 4T1 cells | Magnetic hyperthermia | Breast cancer therapy | [103] |
MoOx | PEGylated MoOx | 15–25 nm | 1064 nm | 0.6 W cm−2, 10 min | 4T1 cells | PTT/PDT | Breast cancer therapy | [105] |
BP nanoparticles |
PEGylated BP NPs | 3.2 ± 1.0 nm | 808 nm | 2.0 W cm−2, 5 min | 4T1 cells | PTT | Breast cancer therapy | [112] |
BP nanosheets | DOX loaded PEGylated BP NSs | 100 nm | 808 nm | 1.0 W cm−2, 10 min | HeLa cells | PTT/chemotherapy | Cervical cancer therapy | [117] |
Ti3C2 | Hyaluronic acid modified Ti3C2/DOX | 100 nm (lateral size) | 808 nm | 0.8 W cm−2, 10 min | HCT 116 cells | PTT/PDT/chemotherapy | Colon cancer therapy | [124] |
Zr-FeP MOF | PEGylated siRNA/Zr-FeP MOF | 210 nm (length) | 635 nm | 1.9 W cm−2, 5 min | MCF-7 cells | PTT/PDT | Breast cancer therapy | [126] |
Boron nanosheets | DOX loaded PEGylated B NSs | 250 nm (lateral size) 20 nm (thickness) |
808 nm | 1.0 W cm−2, 10 min | MCF-7 cells | PTT/chemotherapy | Breast cancer therapy | [128] |
2.1. Organic PTAs
Organic PTAs primarily include small-molecule dyes and polymer-based nanomaterials. Many organic PTAs, such as indocyanine green (ICG) and analogs, and semiconducting polymers, have been used for PTT due to their good biocompatibility, high PCE, and simple synthesis. They are summarized and discussed in the categories of organic small molecule-based and polymer-based PTAs.
2.1.1. Organic small molecule-based PTAs
Cyanine-based dyes (ICG and cypate) are typical organic small-molecule PTAs. ICG that was approved by FDA for clinical ophthalmic angiography in 1959 (NDA#011525) is one of the most popular NIR dyes for PTT applications [31]. Chen et al. did a series of pioneering studies that investigated ICG as a PTA delivered intratumorally for photothermal ablation [32–34]. They also reported the enhanced efficacy of immunotherapy after ICG photothermal ablation in metastatic breast cancer [35]. ICG by intratumoral injection could directly ablate primary tumors under laser irradiation and induce immunoadjuvant-directed stimulation for immune responses to eradicate untreated metastases at remote sites.
To further improve the targeting capacity and prolong blood circulation time, ICG has been modified with biocompatible components. Chen et al. integrated ICG with tumor cell membrane to form core-shell nanoparticles [36]. The prepared nanoparticles demonstrated specific targeting to tumor cells and good photothermal responsiveness, resulting in efficient thermal ablation of xenograft tumors under 808 nm laser irradiation.
2.1.2. Organic polymer-based PTAs
Some semiconducting polymers, such as polydopamine (PDA), and polypyrrole (PPy), exhibit light absorption in the NIR region that makes them useful for PTT. In addition, because these polymers exhibit higher photostability, better biocompatibility, and longer half-life in blood than the organic small-molecule dyes, they have attracted extensive attention as PTAs [37,38]. Liu et al. developed a nanoplatform for PTT combined with chemotherapy using PEGylated borate coordination polymer (CP)-coated PDA NPs (PDA/CP-PEG/DOX) [39]. The photothermal effect of PDA and the chemotherapeutic effect of the porous CP layer loaded with doxorubicin (DOX) provide a potential synergistic therapeutic effect. PEGylation could attenuate NPs elimination by the reticuloendothelial system and increase passive targeting ability. The PDA/CP-PEG/DOX showed low system toxicity, effective tumor targeting and good chemo-photothermal tumor suppressive activity. PPy, because of its good biocompatibility and stability, can be an outstanding candidate for PTT application [40]. Zha et al. synthesized uniform PPy nanoparticles via a one-step aqueous dispersion polymerization strategy [41]. The as-prepared PPy nanoparticles exhibited good photostability and PCE and could effectively kill HeLa cells by the hyperthermic effect of PPy nanoparticles. Zhang et al. prepared PPy nanoparticles by a microwave-assisted method, and the synthesis time was shortened to 2 minutes [42]. The obtained PPy nanoparticles possessed uniform size, excellent water solubility, and good photothermal performance. An in vitro photothermal experiment using the PPy nanoparticles led to significant death of cancer cells, and in vivo tumor ablation under 808 nm laser irradiation was achieved.
Semiconducting polymer PTAs are composed of a highly extended π-conjugated main chain with two alternating parts, an electron donor and an electron acceptor. The band gap between the highest occupied molecular orbital and the lowest unoccupied molecular orbital can be easily tuned for strong NIR absorption, good light stability, and ideal biophysical properties [43,44]. Jiang et al. prepared a photothermal semiconducting polymer nanopartciles with two simultaneous absorption peaks in the NIR-I and NIR-II biowindows [45]. The nanoparticles had a PCE of 44.9 and 43.4% at 808 nm and 1064 nm, respectively. Its deep-tissue photoheating capabilities under NIR-I and NIR-II light were compared. When the tissue depth was 2, 5, 10 and 20 mm, the maximum photothermal temperature of the nanoparticles irradiated at 1064 nm was 4.6, 4.7, 8.5 and 3.3 times higher than that at 808 nm, respectively. In vivo and in vitro investigation showed that the nanoparicles could effectively ablate cancer cells without damage to normal tissues under 1064 nm laser irradiation.
2.2. Inorganic PTAs
Since Hirsch et al. first introduced metal nanoshells for the PTT of human breast carcinoma tumors in 2003 [46], various inorganic nanomaterials have been prepared and used as PTAs for PTT applications. The primary inorganic PTAs include carbon-based nanomaterials, noble metal-based nanomaterials, metal sulfide nanomaterials, metal oxide nanomaterials, MXenes, and black phosphorus nanosheets. The latest advances in PTT based on these inorganic materials are summarized and compared.
2.2.1. Carbon-based nanomaterials
Carbon-based nanomaterials, such as graphene, graphene oxide (GO), reduced graphene oxide (rGO), and carbon nanotubes (CNTs), have distinctive chemical and physical properties and have been extensively used in cancer treatment [47,48].
Graphene is composed of one or several single-atom-thick layers of sp2-bonded carbon atoms. Graphene exhibits excellent physical characteristics, such as plasma properties, which enables graphene and its derivatives to transform light energy into heat energy through the photothermal effect of plasma. When graphene materials are irradiated by light, surface plasmons can be activated to generate random dipoles and resonance and are finally converted into heat energy, which is the main reason graphene-based materials can perform PTT [49]. Yang et al. first studied the in vivo behavior of PEGylated GO (GO-PEG) in tumor bearing mice and found that GO-PEG showed high efficiency in passive tumor targeting and low retention in reticuloendothelial systems [50]. Moreover, due to the strong NIR absorption of GO-PEG, effective tumor ablation was achieved in vivo through the intravenous injection of GO-PEG and 808 nm laser irradiation at a safe power level. Chang et al. took advantage of the low toxicity and high specific surface area of GO to develop a versatile GO/BaHoF5/PEG nanocomposite. The as-prepared GO nanocomposite showed good biocompatibility and achieved effective ablation of cancer cells under a safe power density in vivo [51]. rGO is a well-known graphene derivative. Robinson et al. prepared PEG-modified rGO with good aqueous solubility and high-efficiency photothermal ablation under 808 nm laser irradiation [52]. Compared with PEGylated GO, the NIR absorption of the PEGylated rGO was enhanced by 6 times under the same conditions.
As a type of carbon nanomaterial, single-walled carbon nanotubes (SWCNTs), which are composed of sp2 carbon sheets, also have excellent light absorption characteristics. Lu et al. reported the low toxicity of SWCNTs bound with targeting antibodies [53]. In vivo and in vitro studies showed that the SWCNTs showed stable photothermal properties and good biosafety and could achieve precise targeting of tumors for photothermal ablation. In addition, by bonding or wrapping, CNTs can be easily functionalized with different medical molecules or nanomaterials such as drugs, biomolecules and magnetic NPs [54,55]. In this way, the photothermal performance of CNTs can be improved, and synergetic therapy can be developed. For instance, Liu et al. fabricated a multifunctional nanoplatform by the PEGylation of mesoporous silica (MS) coated SWCNTs, which were used as a carrier of anticancer drugs and a PTA for combination therapy of cancer [56]. SWCNT/MS-PEG could efficiently load doxorubicin (DOX) in the mesoporous structure of SWCNTs. The SWCNT/MS-PEG/DOX exhibited NIR light-dependent drug release behavior, which achieved an outstanding tumor synergetic inhibition effect in an animal tumor model.
The carbon-based nanomaterials with high NIR absorbance and excellent PCE have been used as PTA for many years. However, the potential long-term toxicity of carbon-based nanomaterials is a major obstacle to their future clinical application.
2.2.2. Noble metal-based nanomaterials
Noble metal-based nanomaterials are one of the most explored nanomaterials for PTT [57–59], and are prepared from Au, Ag, Pt, and Pd [60,61]. The PTT of noble-metal nanomaterials is based on their optical property of localized surface plasmon resonance (LSPR), which is a collective oscillation of light-induced free electrons. By changing the size, shape, ligand, and composition of the nanoparticles, the wavelength of LSPR can be adjusted in the NIR region [62]. Thus, various sizes and shapes of noble-metal nanomaterials, including nanorods, nanospheres, nanocages, nanostars, and nanosheets, have been studied for enhancing PTT properties [63–65].
Gold nanoparticles show typical absorption bands in the 500 to 550 nm region, and increasing the size does not allow the absorption peak to be fine-tuned in the NIR region, which limits its application in PTT [66]. However, when the interparticle gap decreases, the absorption peak of the LSPR of AuNPs can be shifted from visible light to the NIR region. Therefore, gold nanospheres with a few nanometers are often used to construct gold-nanoaggregates for PTT applications in cancers [67,68]. Park et al. synthesized albumin-containing gold-nanoaggregates (~88 nm) by mixing the gold nanospheres (~4.5 nm) with albumin and promoting their agglomeration [69]. The as-prepared gold-nanoaggregates exhibited stronger absorption in the wavelength of 600–900 nm and elevated the tumor temperature of colon tumor-bearing mice over 50°C in vivo under 808 nm laser irradiation, which markedly suppressed cancer growth.
Gold nanorods (AuNRs) are among the most interesting morphologies developed for PTT applications. Depending on the diameter and length of the rods, AuNRs have two characteristic optical absorptions, namely, transverse and longitudinal optical absorption, respectively. Therefore, by adjusting the length/diameter ratio, the LSPR of AuNRs can be shifted to the NIR region, and the PCE of AuNRs can be significantly improved for PTT [70]. Mackey et al. determined optimal AuNR size by comparing the plasma characteristics of three different sizes of AuNRs [71]. Among three different AuNRs with an aspect ratio of 3.4–3.5 (38 × 11, 28 × 8, and 17 × 5 nm), they found that the 28 × 8 nm AuNRs were the most effective in plasma photothermal generation and in thermal ablation of HSC-3 tumor cells. In addition, because of simple surface modification, AuNRs are attractive nanocarriers for loading drugs, antibodies, photosensitizers and genes, which paves the way for synergistic cancer therapy, such as PTT/chemotherapy [72], PTT/PDT [73], PTT/gene therapy [74].
Gold nanostars and nanocages have been extensively investigated for PTT. Xia et al. reported a simple strategy to synthesize gold nanostars coated with matrix metalloproteinases (MMP2) polypeptides and IR-780 iodide through bovine serum albumin (BSA) for targeted imaging and enhanced PTT/PDT in lung cancer [75]. Wang et al. reported a multi-stimuli-responsive platform based on drug-loaded gold nanocages (AuNCs) @hyaluronic acid (DOX/AuNCs/HA) (Figure 2(a))[76]. DOX could be released from DOX/AuNCs/HA in intracellular environments, and the release was accelerated upon 808 nm laser irradiation (Figure 2(b)). Both in vitro and in vivo, the DOX/AuNCs/HA exhibited strong anti-cancer effect (Figure 2(c, d)), which dramatically improved the therapeutic efficacy compared to chemotherapy or photothermal treatment alone.
In addition to Au nanomaterials of various shapes, Ag nanomaterials have been used in PTT of tumors due to the LSPR properties and the toxicity of Ag+ [77,78]. Similarly, Pt nanomaterials have also been reported to generate enough heat to ablate tumors under NIR laser irradiation [79,80].
2.2.3. Metal sulfide nanomaterials
Metal sulfide nanomaterials, which are lower in cost than noble metals, are also widely used in PTT. The CuS and copper-deficient structures (Cu2-xS) exhibit an NIR absorption due to the d-d energy band transition of Cu2+ ions, which allows them to be used as PTAs [81,82]. Zhou et al. developed both citrate- and polyethylene glycol (PEG)-stabilized CuS NPs, which displayed a strong absorption at 930 nm [83]. The CuS NPs showed a passive targeting effect in vivo and could promote the photothermal ablation of U87 tumor cells under exposure to 808 nm laser. The size and shape of copper chalcogenide nanomaterials play a prominent role in the photothermal performance. Tian et al. reported hydrophilic flower-like CuS superstructures as an efficient 980 nm laser-driven PTA for the photothermal ablation of tumors [84]. The flower-like CuS exhibited high PCE that was increased by approximately 50% compared to that of its corresponding architectural hexagonal nanoplates and could efficiently ablate cancer cells by its photothermal effect under 980 nm laser irradiation. Wang et al. reported that PEG-coated NIR plasmonic Cu2-xS nanocrystals showed dual PTT and PDT cytotoxic effects on melanoma [85].
MoS2, a representative transition-metal sulfide, is of great interest in PTT of cancers [86]. Chou et al. synthesized chemically exfoliated MoS2 nanosheets as NIR PTAs [87]. MoS2 nanosheets displayed approximately 7.8 times stronger absorption in the NIR region than GO with an extinction coefficient of 29.2 L g−1 cm−1 at 800 nm. Liu et al. developed multifunctional MoS2 nanosheets as a drug carrier and a PTA for PTT combined with chemotherapy to treat cancer [88]. MoS2 nanosheets were synthesized by chemical exfoliation and then modified with lipoic acid-modified PEG (LA-PEG) to improve their physiological stability and biocompatibility. Both in vitro and in vivo studies showed that MoS2-PEG nanosheets had no obvious cytotoxicity. Furthermore, the DOX-loaded MoS2-PEG nanosheets, combined with PTT, had excellent synergistic anticancer effects in suppressing breast tumor growth in vivo.
Recently, metal sulfide nanomaterials such as WS2 and Bi2S3, have also been reported as promising PTAs for cancer treatment owing to their strong absorbance in the NIR region [89,90]. Cheng et al. reported a general strategy to dope Gd3+ ions in WS2 nanoflakes modified with PEG as diagnostic and therapeutic agents (Gd3+/WS2/PEG) for imaging-guided PTT/radiation therapy of cancers [91].
These studies indicate that metal sulfide nanomaterials have distinct features, such as high NIR absorbance, tunable components, and favorable photothermal stability. In addition, metal sulfide nanomaterials can integrate with other therapeutic molecules to achieve a combination of PTT, PDT, chemotherapy and radiation therapy. Although the metal sulfide nanomaterials have aroused great research interest, there is still a long way to go in clinical applications.
2.2.4. Metal oxide nanomaterials
In addition to the metal sulfide nanomaterials, metal oxide nanomaterials, such as magnetic iron oxide, molybdenum oxide and manganese oxide, have been proven to be highly popular PTAs for PTT [92–94]. Iron oxide nanomaterials have been extensively studied to produce a thermal response under NIR light radiation and the presence of alternating magnetic fields [95]. Iron oxides include γ-Fe2O3, Fe3O4 and FeO, among which the most studied are γ-Fe2O3 and Fe3O4 because they exhibit superparamagnetism, high specific surface area, and biocompatibility [96]. Furthermore, iron oxide nanoparticles were approved by FDA in 2009 as iron replacement in the treatment of iron deficiency anemia in patients with chronic kidney disease (NDA#022180). In general, iron oxide nanomaterials can be synthesized by many methods, such as co-precipitation, thermal decomposition, or hydrothermal or solvothermal synthesis [97,98]. Zhao et al. prepared nanocapsules with shells of a mixture of poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) (PLGA) and superparamagnetic iron oxide (Fe3O4) and cores of perfluorohexane (PFH) as diagnostic and therapeutic agents (PFH@PLGA/Fe3O4) for imaging-guided PTT [99]. After exposure to NIR laser irradiation, the thermal effect of infrared radiation and the thermoelastic expansion effect of the phase transition of PFH@PLGA/Fe3O4 synergistically caused agglutinative necrosis and damage of cancer cells. Moreover, the Fe3O4 NPs and PFH could serve as favorable contrast agents for magnetic resonance (MR) and ultrasound imaging, respectively. Yang et al. reported hyaluronic acid (HA)-functionalized superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles (HA-SPIONs) for T2-weighted MR imaging and PTT of breast cancer with CD44 HA receptor overexpression [100].
Recently, due to their special magnetic response, magnetic iron oxide nanoparticles have attracted widespread attention for magnetic hyperthermia treatment (MHT) under an alternating magnetic field to selectively ablate cancer cells [101,102]. Liu et al. constructed PEGylated ferrimagnetic vortex-domain iron oxide nanorings (FVIOs-PEG) (Figure 3(a)), which could achieve a stable vortex domain and excellent magnetocaloric performance (Figure 3(b)) [103]. The biocompatible FVIOs-PEG generated mild heat under an alternating magnetic field, which induced apoptosis and calreticulin (CRT) exposure on the surface of 4T1 cells. In an orthotopic 4T1 tumor model, the combination of FVIOs-PEG magnetic hyperthermia and anti-PD-L1 therapy not only eliminated the primary tumors treated with an alternating magnetic field locally but also significantly prevented lung metastasis (Figure 3(c-f)).
Other metal oxides such as MoOx and MnOx can also be used as PTAs in antitumor PTT. Liu et al. synthesized a new type of bow tie-like MoO2 NPs with strong LSPR effect, high PCE, and low toxicity [104]. In vitro and in vivo studies indicated that the MoO2 NPs produced a very impressive thermal ablation effect on cancer cells. Yin et al. reported plasmonic PEGylated MoOx NPs (MoOx-PEG) by using a facile hydrothermal method [105]. The MoOx-PEG exhibited strong absorption and marked PCE in both the 808 nm and 1064 nm NIR biowindows. The photothermal ablation effects of PEG-MoOx for tumor cells were achieved under 808 nm and 1064 nm laser irradiation, and these NPs could be gradually eliminated by metabolism from the liver and spleen of mice. In addition, the MoOx-PEG exposed to 1064 nm laser irradiation could not only effectively convert light into heat but also stimulate the formation of ROS, which induced dramatic tumor cell death in vivo due to the synergistic PTT/PDT effect.
2.2.5. Black phosphorus
Since the first successful exfoliation in 2014, black phosphorus (BP) has attracted widespread attention for its unique structure and properties [106]. Due to the weak van der Waals forces between stacked BP layers, BP can be easily peeled off into a single layer or several layers of nanosheets. The wide tuning range of the band gap in BP allows wide absorption in the NIR region, so it can be used for PTT, PDT and PA imaging [107,108]. In addition, BP exhibits relatively low cytotoxicity and good biocompatibility because BP is easily biodegradable in the body and can produce nontoxic intermediates such as phosphate, phosphite and other PxOy upon coming into contact with water and oxygen, which also further increases its clinical application prospects [109,110]. Sun et al. synthesized ultrasmall BP quantum dots (BPQDs) by using a liquid exfoliation strategy that incorporated probe and bath sonication (Figure 4(a)) [111]. The ultrasmall BPQDs that had a lateral size of approximately 2.6 nm and a thickness of approximately 1.5 nm exhibited excellent photothermal performance and photostability with a high extinction coefficient of 14.8 L g−1 cm−1 and a PCE of 28.4% at 808 nm (Figure 4(b-d)). After PEG modification, the BPQDs-PEG showed enhanced stability in physiological medium, and its toxicity to cells was basically minimal. Further in vitro studies demonstrated a high PTT efficiency of the BPQDs-PEG in inducing cancer cell death (Figure 4(e)). Sun et al. reported water-soluble and biocompatible PEGylated BPQDs that were prepared by one-pot solventless high energy mechanical milling technique [112]. In vitro experiments confirmed the excellent biocompatibility of PEGylated BPQDs and the photothermal ablation of cancer cells under 808 nm laser irradiation. In vivo experiments showed that the PEGylated BPQDs could serve as a PTA for the PA imaging-guided PTT of cancer.
In addition to BPQDs, BP nanosheets (BPNSs) have made some progress in cancer treatment [113]. Fu et al. prepared three kinds of BPNSs with different sizes (namely, large BP (394 nm ± 75 nm), medium BP (118 nm ± 22 nm) and small BP (4.5 nm ± 0.6 nm)) by using an ameliorated liquid exfoliation technique [114]. Three different sizes of BPNSs were compared for their cytocompatibility and photothermal effect. All the three types of BPNSs possessed excellent biocompatibility, and the larger BPNSs showed better thermal ablation of cancer cells.
BPNSs can also be used as nanocarriers by taking advantage of their large surface area to deliver chemotherapy drugs, genes and biomolecules [115,116]. Tao et al. designed a theranostic delivery platform based on BPNSs for cancer therapy (Figure 4(f)) [117]. BPNSs were prepared from bulk BP by a mechanical exfoliation strategy and then modified with positively charged PEG-NH2 by electrostatic adsorption to improve their biocompatibility and physiological stability (Figure 4(g)). The PEGylated BPNSs were loaded with doxorubicin (DOX) and folate for chemotherapy, and the as-prepared DOX-loaded PEGylated BPNSs exhibited enhanced antitumor effects both in vitro and in vivo (Figure 4(h-j)).
2.2.6. MXenes
MXenes are a class of multifunctional 2D nanomaterials including transition metal carbides and carbonitrides with many attractive features [118,119]. The general formula of an MXene is Mn+1Xn, where M represents an early transition metal, and X represents carbon or nitrogen, n = 1, 2, 3 [120]. MXenes possess excellent absorption in the NIR range and high PCE, demonstrating broad application prospects. Ti3C2 nanosheets were the first MXenes that were proven to be an effective PTA for PTT. Xuan et al. utilized organic base-driven intercalation and delamination to produce modified Ti3C2 nanosheets on the basis of the most widely studied Ti3AlC2 [121]. The as-prepared Ti3C2 nanosheets manifested strong absorption in the NIR region and exhibited a high extinction coefficient of 29.1 L g−1 cm−1 at 808 nm. Next, they used the Ti3C2 nanosheets as a PTA for 4T1 cell ablation under 808 nm laser irradiation and showed that these nanosheets could effectively ablate cancer cells. Lin et al. also synthesized Ti3C2 nanosheets modified with soybean phospholipid (Ti3C2-SP) based on two-step exfoliation of MAX (M is an early transition metal carbide, A is an A group element, and X is C or N.) phase Ti3AlC2 [122]. The Ti3C2-SP nanosheets demonstrated highly effective hyperthermia against cancer cells through intravenous or intratumor injection of the Ti3C2-SP nanosheets and 808 nm laser irradiation.
Ta4C3 nanosheets, another type of MXene, have also been reported for use in PTT. Lin et al. reported Ta4C3 nanosheets with nanosized lateral widths obtained by the two-step liquid exfoliation of MAX phase Ta4AlC3 [123]. Compared to Ti3C2 nanosheets, these Ta4C3 nanosheets possessed a biocompatible Ta component and higher PCE of 44.7% in addition to excellent photothermal stability. Further in vivo photothermal therapeutic experiments with Ta4C3 nanosheets under laser irradiation resulted in very severe necrosis of cancer cells and negligible cytotoxicity to normal cells.
The 2D MXenes have a large surface area that allows easy loading of various therapeutic agents, such as chemotherapeutics and biomacromolecules. Liu et al. synthesized Ti3C2 nanosheets by a surface modification method [124]. The Ti3C2 nanosheets exhibited a high extinction coefficient of 28.6 L g−1 cm−1 and a PCE of 58.3% at 808 nm. Furthermore, through the layer-by-layer adsorption of doxorubicin (DOX) and tumor-targeted HA, a multifunctional nanoplatform based on Ti3C2 nanosheets (Ti3C2/DOX/HA) with a drug loading capacity of up to 84.2% was achieved. The Ti3C2/DOX/HA displayed tumor site-specific accumulation, controlled stimuli-responsive drug release, and synergistic cancer therapy effects in vivo.
2.2.7. Other nanomaterials
In addition to the nanomaterials mentioned above, some other nanomaterials such as metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) have also been explored as PTAs for PTT applications. MOFs are a class of molecular crystalline materials that consist of metal ions or clusters bridged by organic linkers [125]. Zhang et al. prepared zirconium-ferriporphyrin MOF (Zr-FeP) nanoshuttles by a simple one-pot hydrothermal strategy and then loaded heat shock protein 70 (Hsp70) inhibitor siRNA on the nanoshuttles to obtain siRNA/Zr-FeP [126]. Under NIR laser irradiation, the siRNA/Zr-FeP enabled the simultaneous generation of heat and reactive oxygen species (ROS), in which Hsp70 siRNA could improve the mild temperature PTT. Both in vitro and in vivo experiments showed that the siRNA/Zr-FeP could combine PDT with mild temperature PTT, resulting in significant suppression of cancer growth.
Nanocomposites can integrate various nanomaterials to conquer the drawbacks of individual nanomaterials, such as poor biocompatibility and PCE. Yang et al. designed a novel nanocomposite by the assembly of Fe3O4 nanoparticles and Au nanoparticles on BP nanosheets (BPs@Au@Fe3O4), which exhibited a strong NIR absorption [127]. In vitro and in vivo studies indicated that the BPs@Au@Fe3O4 NPs showed high biocompatibility and excellent anticancer efficacy owing to a synergistic PTT/PDT effect mediated by low laser power. Moreover, the BPs@Au@Fe3O4 could visualize the tumor growth in vivo with the help of MR imaging.
Ultrathin boron (B) nanosheets are another interesting 2D nanomaterial developed as PTAs for PTT. Ji et al. developed a new photonic drug delivery platform based on the PEGylated B NSs [128]. The as-prepared B NSs exhibited multiple promising features: a high PCE of 42.5%, high DOX-loading capacity and release triggered by NIR laser irradiation, excellent biocompatibility, and strong accumulation at tumor sites. In vitro and in vivo experiments demonstrated the outstanding synergistic anticancer effect of the DOX-loaded PEGylated B NSs.
3. 3D scaffolds for cancer therapy and tissue regeneration
Cells are surrounded by their 3D extracellular matrices (ECMs) in vivo. Nanomaterials need to pass through the ECM to reach the cells. In recent years, PTAs have been incorporated into 3D scaffolds to construct composite scaffolds for efficient delivery to cancer cells [129,130]. The composite scaffolds can be implanted in targeting sites for the photothermal ablation of cancer cells or possible residual tumor cells after surgery. Local implantation of the composite scaffolds can constrain the localization of PTAs in the implanted sites, and therefore the composites can be repeated irradiated for the repeated ablation of cancer cells. The composite scaffolds can be designed for multiple functions. At the initial stage after implantation, the composite scaffolds act as PTAs for PTT ablation of cancer cells. At the late stage after cancer eradication, tissue reconstruction and regeneration are required for large defects. The 3D composite scaffolds can serve as templates to provide necessary spaces and microenvironments for the regeneration of new tissues and organs. The composite scaffolds can stimulate the migration, adhesion, proliferation, and differentiation of cells, such as mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) [131], and further promote the healing of tissue defects induced by tumor thermal ablation or resection, especially in breast, bone or skin cancer. Some typical composite scaffolds of photothermal nanomaterials and their preparation methods, properties and biomedical applications are summarized in Table 2. Details of these composite scaffolds are introduced and discussed in the following sections.
Table 2.
Type of PTAs | Scaffold | Fabrication method | Irradiation conditions |
Cell type |
Application | Ref. | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Wavelength | Power and time | Cancer | Normal tissue | |||||
PDA | PDA modified alginate scaffold | 3D printing method | 808 nm | 0.5 W cm−2, 5 min | 4T1 cells | MCF-10A cells | Breast cancer therapy and breast reconstruction | [132] |
PPy, PDA | PPy@PDA hydrogel scaffold | Freeze-drying method | 808 nm | 1.41 W cm−2, 10 min | A375 cells | L929 cells | Skin cancer therapy and wound healing | [136] |
OPC | OPC containing hydrogel scaffold | 3D printing method | 808 nm | 1.2 W cm−2, 15 min | B16F10 cells | HUVECs/HDFs | Skin cancer therapy and wound healing | [137] |
Carbon dots | CD doped chitosan/ nanohydroxyapatite scaffold |
Freeze-drying method | 808 nm | 1.0 W cm−2, 10 min | UMR-106 cells | rBMSCs | Bone cancer therapy and reconstruction | [140] |
Graphene oxide | GO/polycaprolactone scaffold | Salt template assisted method | 808 nm | 0.75 W cm−2, 1 min | MCF-7 cells | ADSCs | Breast cancer therapy and adipose tissue repair | [141] |
Graphene oxide | PCL microfiber/GO scaffold | Electrospinning method | 810 nm | 10 W cm−2, 200 s | MCF-7 cells | HDFs | Breast cancer therapy and adipose tissue repair | [142] |
Au nanostars/rods | Au nanostars/rods integrated Gelatin scaffold | Ice particulate templating method | 805 nm | 1.6 W cm−2, 3.0 min | HeLa cells | / | Cervical cancer therapy | [143] |
Au nanorods | AuNRs integrated Gelatin scaffold | Ice particulate templating method | 805 nm | 1.6 W cm−2, 6.0 min | 4T1 cells | hMSCs | Breast cancer therapy and adipose tissue repair | [146] |
Au nanocages | AuNCs integrated BCP scaffold | Sintering method | 690/808 nm | 1.0 W cm−2, 10 min | / | Macrophages/Dendritic cells | Bone regeneration | [147] |
Cu2S | Cu2S incorporated PLA/PCL scaffold | Electrospinning method | 808 nm | 0.4 W cm−2, 15 min | B16F10 cells | HUVECs/HDFs | Skin cancer therapy and wound healing | [149] |
CuFeSe2 | CuFeSe2 integrated BG scaffold | 3D printing method | 808 nm | 0.55 W cm−2, 10 min | Saos-2 cells | rBMSCs | Bone cancer therapy and reconstruction | [150] |
MoS2 | MoS2 modified Akermanite scaffold | 3D printing method | 808 nm | 0.5 W cm−2, 10 min | Saos-2 cells | rBMSCs | Bone cancer therapy and reconstruction | [152] |
Fe3O4 | Gelatin/Fe3O4 composite scaffold | Ice particulate templating method | 805 nm | 1.6 W cm−2, 3.0 min | HeLa cells | / | Cervical cancer therapy | [157] |
Fe3O4 | Fe3O4/GdPO4/CS scaffold | Freeze-drying method | 808 nm | 4.6 W cm−2, 150 s | MDA-MB-231 Cells | hBMSCs | Breast cancer-induced bone metastases therapy and reconstruction | [158] |
Fe3O4 | Fe3O4/GO composite scaffold | 3D printing method | Magnetic field | 180 Gs/409 kHz, 20 min | MG63 cells | rBMSCs | Bone cancer therapy and reconstruction | [160] |
BP nanosheets | BP NSs integrated BG scaffold | 3D printing method | 808 nm | 1.0 W cm−2, 5 min | Saos-2 cells | hBMSCs | Bone cancer therapy and reconstruction | [162] |
BP nanosheets | BP NSs incorporated Gelatin-PCL scaffold | Electrospinning method | 808 nm | 0.65 W cm−2, 15 min | B16F10 cells | HUVECs/NIH-3T3 cells | Skin cancer therapy and wound healing | [163] |
Nb2C | Mesoporous Silica@Nb2C/BG scaffold | 3D printing method | 1064 nm | 1.0 W cm−2, 10 min | Saos-2 cells | hBMSCs | Bone cancer therapy and reconstruction | [167] |
Ti3C2 | Ti3C2/BG scaffold | 3D printing method | 808 nm | 1.0 W cm−2, 10 min | Saos-2 cells | hBMSCs | Bone cancer therapy and reconstruction | [169] |
Cu-TCPP | Cu-TCPP/TCP scaffold | 3D printing method | 808 nm | 0.9 W cm−2, 10 min | Saos-2 cells | hBMSCs/HUVECs | Bone cancer therapy and reconstruction | [170] |
Bi2O3 | Bi2O3 doped BG scaffold | Melting and quenching technique | 808 nm | 1.5 W cm−2, 10 min | UMR106 cells | MC3T3-E1 cells |
Bone cancer therapy and reconstruction | [171] |
3.1. Scaffolds incorporating organic PTAs
In most cancer treatments, tissue defects and residual tumor cells are two key issues for prognosis. Therefore, in the treatment process, it is important to create multifunctional scaffolds that can both kill the cancer cells and repair the tissues. In recent research, a series of strategies have been proposed for combining PTAs with engineering scaffold materials, such as hydrogels, electrospun nanofibers, and 3D printed scaffolds, to repair tissue defects after the ablation of tumor tissue. Organic PTAs have been hybridized with alginate, silk fibroin (SF) and bioactive glass (BG) to prepare PTT composite scaffolds [132–134].
Alginate has good biocompatibility and exhibits controlled gelation, and it is therefore widely used in soft tissue regeneration [135]. Luo et al. integrated PDA and alginate into a dual-functional scaffold by 3D printing [132]. The alginate-polydopamine (PDA/Alg) composite scaffold exhibited good photothermal ablation of 4T1 cancer cells in vivo under 808 nm laser irradiation, which efficiently prevented the local recurrence of breast cancer. In addition, the PDA/Alg composite scaffolds possessed high elasticity and modulus values similar to those of normal breast tissues and could promote the adhesion and proliferation of normal breast epithelial MCF-10A cells. Miao et al. reported the use of PDA-modified SF composite scaffolds to achieve effective bone cancer treatment [133]. PDA/SF composite scaffolds were prepared by a freeze-drying method and had micropores with a size of 200–250 µm that could accommodate cells in the tissue regeneration process. The PDA/SF composite scaffolds showed excellent photothermal effects, inducing significant cytotoxicity to human osteosarcoma cells under 808 nm laser irradiation. Furthermore, the PDA/SF composite scaffolds could improve the structure and performance of SF for bone tissue regeneration.
Zhou et al. developed a multifunctional hydrogel scaffold through incorporating PDA-functionalized BG nanocomposites into F127-ε-Poly-L-lysine hydrogel (BG@PDA/FCB) for skin tumor treatment and wound healing [134]. The BG@PDA/FCB composite scaffolds were fabricated by a freeze-drying method and showed porous structures, which could effectively speed up wound healing in vivo by stimulating collagen deposition and angiogenesis. The BG@PDA/FCB composite scaffolds also exhibited high antitumor capability, suppressing melanoma growth in vivo via an efficient photothermal effect. After that, Zhou et al. reported polypyrrole@polydopamine (PPy@PDA)-functionalized poly(glycerol-amino acid)-based composite scaffolds (PGFP) [136]. The PGFP composite scaffolds loaded with DOX drugs exhibited significant photothermal chemotherapy effects in vivo and in vitro and at the same time accelerated the formation of granulation tissue, the deposition of collagen and the differentiation of vascular endothelium, promoting skin regeneration.
In addition to PDA and PPy, oligomeric proanthocyanidins (OPC), a kind of grape seed extract, can also be used as a natural PTA for tumor treatment and tissue regeneration by hybridization with 3D scaffolds. Ma et al. fabricated composite scaffolds of calcium silicate nanowires, sodium alginate and OPC through a 3D printing strategy for melanoma therapy and wound healing [137]. The composite scaffolds showed an ablation effect on melanoma cells and simultaneously promoted wound healing.
3.2. Scaffolds incorporating carbon-based nanomaterials
Carbon-based nanomaterials, such as carbon dots (CDs), GO, and SWCNTs, have attacted extensive attention as PTAs. They have been incorporated in 3D porous scaffolds of biodegradable polymers and bioceramics to combine their PTT effect and the tissue regeneration guiding effect of 3D scaffolds. Their composite scaffolds with chitosan/nanohydroxyapatite, polycaprolactone and β-tricalcium phosphate have been explored for possible applications to treat bone or skin cancer [138,139]. Lu et al. reported zero-dimensional CD-doped chitosan/nanohydroxyapatite scaffolds [140]. Under NIR laser irradiation, the CD-CS/nanohydroxyapatite scaffolds effectively prevented the proliferation of osteosarcoma UMR-106 cells in vitro and significantly suppressed bone tumor growth in vivo. The composite scaffolds also showed outstanding antibacterial ability against S. aureus and E. coli. Moreover, compared to the CS/nanohydroxyapatite scaffolds, the CD-CS/nanohydroxyapatite composite scaffolds enhanced the adhesion and osteoinductivity of MSCs in vitro through upregulating the related genes and effectively accelerated the formation of new bone tissue in vivo.
Bai et al. developed a pH-responsive scaffold (GO-PCL) by hybridizing polycaprolactone (PCL), polyacrylic acid-g-polylactic acid (PAA-g-PLLA) and GO functionalized with gambogic acid (GA) (Figure 5(a)) [141]. In the slightly acidic environment surrounding cancer cells, GA could be released from the GO-PCL composite scaffolds and bind to Hsp90 protein, enabling mild-temperature PTT for cancer cells without affecting normal cells. The mild temperature PTT of the scaffolds could cause more than 95% cell death of breast cancer MCF-7 cells in vitro (Figure 5(b)), which further inhibited cancer growth and eventually eliminated the cancer cells in vivo (Figure 5(c, d)). Meanwhile, the GO-PCL composite scaffolds seeded with adipose-derived stem cells (ADSCs) significantly accelerated the formation of new adipose tissue (Figure 5(e)). Ma et al. fabricated a bifunctional GO-functionalized β-tricalcium phosphate composite scaffold (GO/TCP) by 3D printing combined surface modification strategies [26]. The as-prepared GO/TCP composite scaffolds could effectively ablate osteosarcoma MG63 cells in vivo and promote bone tissue repair in the bone defects of rabbits. Mauro et al. reported composite scaffolds of polycaprolactone microfiber (PCLmf) and GO nanosheets that were prepared by an electrospinning technique [142]. The PCLmf-GO composite scaffolds enhanced the adhesion and proliferation of cells and even allowed cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAF) capture. Moreover, the PCLmf-GO composite scaffolds displayed remarkable performance to capture cancer cells and CAF, and simultaneously implement photothermal ablation of the captured cancer cells in situ due to the PTT property of GO with its high NIR absorbance.
3.3. Scaffolds incorporating gold nanomaterials
Due to the easy synthesis and good photothermal conversion capacity of gold nanoparticles, gold nanoparticles of different morphologies have been hybridized with gelatin and calcium phosphate to construct multifunctional composite scaffolds for combined effect of cancer cell killing effect and tissue regeneration promotion effect. Zhang et al. prepared composite scaffolds of gelatin and gold nanoparticles of different shapes and sizes (Figure 6(a)), including AuNRs and AuNSs of 35, 65, and 115 nm, to retain the gold nanoparticles in the tumor site at a high concentration and long period to achieve repeatable local heating [143]. The composite scaffolds showed different photothermal effects as the LSPR of gold nanoparticles changed with their shape and size. Among the composite scaffolds, those prepared with 65 nm AuNRs showed the highest photothermal conversion capability, increasing the temperature up to 50°C at 1 mM Au concentration (Figure 6(b)). The therapeutic effect of the composite scaffolds was confirmed by HeLa cells seeded on scaffolds and irradiated by a 805 nm laser (Figure 6(c,d)). Furthermore, the AuNR- or AuNS-based composite scaffolds were bound with folic acid, which was able to target folic acid receptor-positive tumor cells, to specifically capture tumor cells and improve the potential therapeutic outcome of the composite scaffolds [144]. In addition, dendritic cells could be activated by coculturing with ablated tumor cells in the composite scaffold, and multiple cytokines were secreted to induce tumor-specific immunotherapy [145].
In addition to the PTT effect to ablate cancer cells, the AuNRs/gelatin composite scaffolds promoted the proliferation and adipogenesis differentiation of human bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells (hMSCs) [146]. Due to their high porosity and interconnectivity, the composite scaffolds could support cell adhesion and proliferation (Figure 6(e)), which was confirmed by culturing hMSCs in the scaffold for 14 days followed by DNA content quantification (Figure 6(f)). Importantly, the adipogenic differentiation of hMSc in the composite scaffolds was analyzed, and the positive results indicated that the AuNR-based composite scaffolds could exhibit multiple functions for both PTT and adipose regeneration.
Composite scaffolds of biphasic calcium phosphate (BCP) and gold nanocages have been prepared for controlled drug release. Zhao et al. prepared composite scaffolds of BCP and two types of gold nanocages that had LSPR peaks at 690 nm and 808 nm (Figure 6(g, h)) [147]. The gold nanocages were conjugated with thermally responsive 1-tetradecanol and loaded with different drugs (interleukin-4 or dexamethasone). The drug-loaded gold nanocages were incorporated into the BCP to form composite scaffolds. When the composite scaffolds were irradiated with 690 nm or 808 nm laser, they could release interleukin-4 and dexamethasone at early and late stages of osteoinduction, respectively, to adjust the local immune microenvironment for new bone formation (Figure 6(i)).
3.4. Scaffolds incorporating copper-based nanomaterials
Copper-based chalcogenides, such as CuS, Cu2-xS and Cu2-xSe, are effective PTAs. In addition, many studies have proven that Cu2+ can accelerate tissue repair through promoting cell migration, angiogenesis and collagen deposition [148]. Therefore, their composite scaffolds with biodegradable polymers have been prepared and investigated for a combined effect of PTT and tissue regeneration. Wang et al. fabricated a dual-functional scaffold by incorporating Cu2S nanoflowers into poly(D, L-lactic acid)/poly (ε-caprolactone) polymer blend (PLA/PCL) fibers by an electrospinning method (Figure 7(a, b)) [149]. Cu2S nanoflowers served not only as a local PTA for cancer treatment but also as a Cu2+ source for wound healing. Under NIR laser irradiation, the Cu2S-PLA/PCL composite scaffolds exhibited controllable photothermal performance, caused a high death rate of skin tumor B16F10 cells in vitro (Figure 7(c)), and effectively inhibited tumor growth in vivo (Figure 7(d, e)). The composite scaffolds also promoted the adhesion, proliferation and migration of normal skin cells and significantly accelerated angiogenesis and the healing of full-thickness skin defects in vivo (Figure 7(f, g)). Dong et al. reported BG scaffolds modified with CuFeSe2 nanocrystals that could significantly inhibit bone tumor growth in vivo, ultimately promoting the formation of new bone [150].
In addition to copper sulfide and its copper-deficient structures, molybdenum disulfide (MoS2) is another typical metal sulfide that has been incorporated into 3D scaffolds for PTT and tissue engineering applications. Wang et al. constructed an integrated scaffold by fixing a PLGA-functionalized MoS2 film on the surface of BG [151]. The MoS2-integrated BG composite scaffolds could rapidly elevate temperature to ablate osteosarcoma cells and inhibit tumor growth in vivo under 808 nm laser irradiation. Meanwhile, the composite scaffolds could stimulate the proliferation and differentiation of rat MSCs, upregulate the expression of osteogenesis-related genes and promote bone repair. Wang et al. also reported 3D-printed bioceramic scaffolds with MoS2 nanosheets for inhibiting cancer growth and inducing bone tissue repair in vivo [152].
Silicate-based biomaterials have been reported to promote epithelial regeneration and collagen deposition during wound healing [153]. Accordingly, Yu et al. prepared electrospun scaffolds doped with copper silicate hollow microspheres (CSHMSs), where the CSHMSs were used as drug carriers, as a PTA for the treatment of melanoma, and as a source of therapeutic elements (copper and silicon) for local wound healing [154]. CSHMSs were first synthesized by a hydrothermal method and then electrospun into the PLA/PCL matrix to obtain CS-PLA/PCL composite scaffolds. The CS-PLA/PCL scaffolds exhibited synergistic effects of PTT and chemotherapy to kill skin cancer cells both in vitro and in vivo, promoted the adhesion and proliferation of normal skin cells, and accelerated skin wound healing. By a similar approach, Yu et al. integrated CaCuSi4O10 NPs into electrospun PLA/PCL scaffolds for tumor treatment and skin tissue regeneration [155]. The composite scaffolds quickly ablated tumor cells under NIR laser irradiation, effectively inhibited tumor growth in mice, and promoted wound healing by releasing bioactive Cu2+ and SiO44- ions from the CaCuSi4O10 NPs after cancer treatment.
3.5. Scaffolds incorporating iron-based nanomaterials
Iron nanomaterials can exhibit plasma performance and generate hyperthermic effects in the presence of NIR light and alternating magnetic fields. Previous studies have also proven that Fe3+ ions can affect the differentiation and gene expression of MSCs [156]. Therefore, magnetic iron oxide nanoparticles have been incorporated into 3D scaffolds to investigate their PTT and magnetothermal heating (MTH) effects. Zhang et al. recently fabricated 3D composite scaffolds of Fe3O4 and gelatin (Gel/Fe3O4) for the local photothermal ablation of tumor cells (Figure 8(a)) [157]. The Gel/Fe3O4 composite scaffolds had significant absorption in the NIR region, and under NIR laser irradiation, the local temperature increased rapidly (Figure 8(b, c)). The Gel/Fe3O4 composite scaffolds exhibited the repeated local photothermal ablation of HeLa cells and suppressed the recurrence rate of tumor cells (Figure 8(d)). For bone metastases caused by breast cancer, after surgical removal, the remaining cancer cells will usually induce cancer recurrence. Moreover, surgical removal can cause local bone defects. Zhao et al. fabricated multifunctional Fe3O4/GdPO4/CS scaffolds in which Fe3O4 NPs and GdPO4 nanorods were incorporated into a chitosan (CS) matrix (Figure 8(e)) [158]. The Fe3O4 NPs in the Fe3O4/GdPO4/CS composite scaffolds enhanced NIR absorption capacity, and the local temperature rose high enough to induce cancer cell apoptosis under 808 nm laser irradiation, which effectively avoided cancer recurrence. Moreover, the GdPO4 nanorods in the Fe3O4/GdPO4/CS composite scaffolds stimulated the BMP-2/Smad/RUNX2 signaling pathway, thereby promoting cell proliferation and bone reconstruction (Figure 8(f, g)). Similarly, magnetic SrFe12O19 NP-modified bioactive chitosan porous scaffolds were fabricated for bone reconstruction and PTT against cancers [159].
In addition, the MTH effect of the composite scaffolds has been confirmed for PTT of cancers. Zhang et al. reported 3D-printed β-tricalcium phosphate bioceramic scaffolds with surface-functionalized Fe3O4/GO composite layers (TCP/Fe3O4/GO) [160]. The TCP/Fe3O4/GO composite scaffolds had a relatively consistent hole structure with a diameter of approximately 300–500 µm, and the temperature could be adjusted by controlling the intensity of the magnetic field and the content of Fe3O4 NPs. The TCP/Fe3O4/GO scaffolds with an excellent MTH capacity induced more than 75% osteosarcoma cell death and significantly stimulated alkaline phosphatase (ALP) activity and osteogenic gene expression. Recently, Dong et al. constructed a multifunctional akermanite scaffold (AKT/Fe3O4/CaO2) by loading CaO2 and Fe3O4 nanoparticles [161]. The loaded CaO2 nanoparticles acted as a H2O2 source to achieve self-sufficient H2O2 nanocatalytic osteosarcoma treatment though a Fenton-like Fe3O4 reaction and provided Ca2+ ions to enhance bone regeneration. The AKT/Fe3O4/CaO2 composite scaffolds with synergistic magnetothermal and nanocatalytic therapy effects significantly suppressed tumor growth and enhanced the bone regeneration by releasing Ca2+.
3.6. Scaffolds incorporating black phosphorus
Phosphorus is one of the important elements that make up human bone, accounting for approximately 1% of the total weight of the human body. Because of their interactions with oxygen, visible light and water, BP nanomaterials are easily oxidized and degraded in aqueous solution to form phosphates and phosphonates, thereby causing bone formation and osseointegration. The biodegradation, good biocompatibility and excellent PCE of BP nanomaterials make them attractive components of composite scaffolds for combined effect of PTT and tissue regeneration. Yang et al. incorporated BP nanosheets into 3D-printed BG scaffolds (BP-BG, Figure 9(a)) for localized osteosarcoma therapy and bone tissue regeneration [162]. Due to the excellent tissue regeneration capability and remarkable PTT effects, the BP-BG composite scaffolds exhibited good photothermal ablation against osteosarcoma-bearing nude mice at the early stage after implantation (Figure 9(b-d)) and stimulated osteogenesis, osteoinduction and osteoconduction at the late stage of implantation (Figure 9(e)). Finally, the BP NSs in the scaffolds were oxidized and released PO43- to form calcium phosphate (CAP), which induced biomineralization for bone regeneration (Figure 9(f)).
The potential effect of BP NSs for enhancing skin regeneration has been explored [163]. The composite scaffolds were prepared by embedding BP-DOX-FA into gelatin-polycaprolactone (PCL) nanofibrous scaffolds for melanoma and skin regeneration (Figure 9(g)). In vivo and in vitro studies showed that the composite scaffolds could selectively kill melanoma cells through cooperative PTT and heat-triggerable DOX chemotherapy (Figure 9(h)), and the BP NSs promoted skin tissue regeneration by activating the PI3K/Akt and ERK1/2 pathways (Figure 9(i)).
Recently, Qian et al. explored the effect of BP NSs on the restoration of neurogenesis, angiogenesis and immune homeostasis. The composite scaffolds were produced by using integrative layer-by-layer assembly [164]. The BP NSs were prepared in a PCL dichloromethane solution and sprayed from multiple nozzles onto the conduit-shaped mold. To produce pore alignment, the flip microneedle arc panel was buttoned onto the BP/PCL layer, and staggered pores were added to the scaffolds. The spraying process was repeated to prepare the outermost layer. The pore structure of the scaffolds facilitated the exchange of oxygen and water for axon sprouting. The composite scaffolds allowed controlled BP release to achieve a low-ROS microenvironment and enhance angiogenesis for nerve regeneration. BP at concentrations up to 0.5% was electrically conductive and could regenerate peripheral nerve defects.
3.7. Scaffolds incorporating MXenes
MXenes such as Nb2C possesses good biocompatibility and excellent PCE, which meets the requirement for scaffolds used for tumor treatment and tissue repair. In addition, nitric oxide (NO) has been extensively applied in medicine for its pro-angiogenic, antibacterial, and anticancer effects [165,166]. They have been hybridized with BG and titanium to construct composite scaffolds for cancer therapy and tissue regeneration. Yang et al. fabricated a multifunctional BG scaffold by the integration of Nb2C wrapped with S-nitrosothiol (NO donor)-grafted mesoporous silica with 3D printing BG scaffolds (Nb2C/MS/BG) (Figure 10(a-c)) [167]. The Nb2C/MS/BG composite scaffolds could produce NIR-II triggered photonic hyperthermia from Nb2C and perform precisely controlled NO release for the cooperative multitarget treatment of bone cancer. The phosphorus and calcium components from the degradation of the Nb2C/MS/BG composite scaffolds significantly promoted the biological activity of bone regeneration, which was further enhanced by NO through triggering adequate blood supply. Similarly, a Nb2C titanium plate (Nb2C@TP) composite scaffold was developed to eliminate bacterial infection and promote tissue regeneration [168]. The Nb2C@TP-based hyperthermia therapy not only effectively ablated bacteria in vivo but also mitigated excessive inflammatory responses and ROS production, thereby stimulating angiogenesis and tissue repair.
Pan et al. reported the integration of 2D Ti3C2 MXenes with a 3D-printed BG scaffold (Ti3C2-BG) for bone cancer treatment and reconstruction [169]. The Ti3C2-BG composite scaffolds not only killed the bone cancer cells based on their photothermal properties but also induced the differentiation of human bone marrow MSCs into osteoblasts, which accelerated bone repair in vivo. In the process of bone tissue reconstruction, the Ti3C2-BG composite scaffolds gradually degraded to provide necessary minerals (such as titanium-based species) and space for the newly formed bone tissue.
3.8. Scaffolds incorporating other nanomaterials
MOFs, such as copper-coordinated tetrakis(4-carboxyphenyl) porphyrin (Cu-TCPP), have also been embedded in 3D scaffolds to produce an excellent photothermal response to NIR laser irradiation while maintain the tissue regeneration capacity of the 3D scaffolds. Dang et al. reported a Cu-TCPP nanosheet interface-structured β-tricalcium phosphate (TCP) scaffold (Cu-TCPP/TCP) for cancer therapy and bone reconstruction [170]. The Cu-TCPP/TCP composite scaffolds ablated bone cancer cells and suppressed their growth by exerting photothermal effects in a mouse model. The composite scaffolds also promoted the osteogenic and angiogenic differentiation of hBMSCs and HUVECs. After implantation into the bone defects of rabbits, they effectively boosted bone tissue repair.
Bi has a small carrier effective mass and long Fermi wavelength and has there attracted attention for hybridization with porous scaffolds for biomedical applications. Wang et al. fabricated a novel model of Bi2O3-doped BG with bioactivity and photothermal response for bone cancer therapy and tissue regeneration [171]. Both in vitro and in vivo studies demonstrated that Bi2O3-doped BG efficiently destroyed bone cancer cells under 808 nm laser irradiation, and simultaneously facilitated the multiplication, differentiation and mineralization of osteoblasts on their surface, which promoted the regrowth of the bone tissue.
Various bioceramics, such as calcium phosphate-based bioceramics, silicate bioceramics and BGs, have been proven to have good activity for bone tissue regeneration and tooth restoration [172,173]. Wang et al. synthesized black bioceramics through the magnesium thermal reduction of traditional white ceramics, including silicate-based (CaSiO3, MgSiO3) and phosphate-based (Ca3(PO4)2, Ca5(PO4)3(OH)) ceramics [174]. In vitro and in vivo, these black bioceramics not only showed excellent antitumor effects against both melanoma and osteosarcoma but also significantly promoted skin/bone tissue repair.
4. Conclusions and future perspectives
In this review, we systematically summarized the commonly used PTAs in PTT applications and their composite scaffolds for cancer therapy and tissue regeneration applications (Tables 1 and 2). Unlike traditional cancer treatments, these composite scaffolds can be effectively implanted into tumor sites for the photothermal ablation of tumor cells, and their pore structures benefit cell growth and tissue repair after tumor treatment. Meanwhile, the elements released from the composite scaffolds (such as calcium, copper, and phosphorus) have stimulating and inducing effects on the adhesion, proliferation, and differentiation of cells, which can promote tissue regeneration. In addition, synergistic therapy strategies have been developed in composite scaffolds for improving treatment efficacy or reducing side effects.
Despite the successful development of multifunctional composite scaffolds for tumor therapy and tissue regeneration applications, there are still some challenges in clinical applications. First, the tissue penetration depth of NIR light is a limitation of PTT. The photothermal effect of PTAs can effectively inhibit the growth of superficial tumors such as melanoma, but for deep tumors such as gastrointestinal stromal tumors, its inhibitory effect may be limited. To solve this problem, the exploration of new NIR-II biowindow or magnetothermal agents is necessary. Second, the biodegradation behavior of composite scaffolds in vivo and their potential long-term toxicity should be clarified. Although some biomaterials used in the construction of scaffolds can enhance the physiological stability or biocompatibility, the biodistribution and metabolic pathways of the composite scaffolds still need systematic investigation. Third, synergistic therapy strategies with composite scaffolds should be further developed. To date, synergistic therapy via using composite scaffolds, such as synergistic PTT/chemotherapy, PTT/PDT and PTT/gas therapy, has successfully enhanced tumor therapeutic efficacy, but there are still other therapeutic modalities that can be collaboratively developed and utilized, such as immunotherapy, sonodynamic therapy and starvation therapy. Fourth, since actual tumor and regeneration animal models are difficult to obtain, it is challenging to evaluate the processes and mechanisms of tumor treatment and tissue regeneration in vivo. For example, the tumor inhibition and bone tissue reconstruction effects of composite scaffolds used to treat bone tumors are usually studied separately, which cannot imitate the actual situation in disease treatment. Therefore, choosing a suitable animal model is of great importance to advance the clinical application of these composite scaffolds.
Currently, a variety of nanomaterials with engineering scaffolds have been developed for cancer therapy and tissue regeneration. Nevertheless, most of these composite scaffolds are in the preclinical stage, and further research still needs to be done to promote their clinical applications.
Funding Statement
This work was supported by the JSPS KAKENHI [19H04475].
Disclosure statement
No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).
References
- [1].Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A.. Cancer statistics, 2020. CA Cancer J Clin. 2020;70:7–30. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [2].Shi J, Kantoff PW, Wooster R, et al. Cancer nanomedicine: progress, challenges and opportunities. Nat Rev Cancer. 2017;17:20–37. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [3].Chen Y, Jungsuwadee P, Vore M, et al. Collateral damage in cancer chemotherapy: oxidative stress in nontargeted tissues. Mol Interventions. 2007;7:2653–2663. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [4].Wistuba II, Gelovani JG, Jacoby JJ, et al. Methodological and practical challenges for personalized cancer therapies. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2011;8:135–141. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [5].Liu YJ, Bhattarai P, Dai ZF, et al. Photothermal therapy and photoacoustic imaging via nanotheranostics in fighting cancer. Chem Soc Rev. 2019;48:2053–2108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [6].Lyu Y, Li JC, Pu KY. Second near-infrared absorbing agents for photoacoustic imaging and photothermal therapy. Small Methods. 2019;3:1900553. [Google Scholar]
- [7].Zhao JY, Zhong D, Zhou SB. NIR-I-to-NIR-II fluorescent nanomaterials for biomedical imaging and cancer therapy. J Mater Chem B. 2018;6:349–365. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [8].Gai S, Yang G, Yang P, et al. Recent advances in functional nanomaterials for light-triggered cancer therapy. Nano Today. 2018;19:146–187. [Google Scholar]
- [9].Yu Z, Chan WK, Zhang Y, et al. Near-infrared-II activated inorganic photothermal nanomedicines. Biomaterials. 2021;269:120459. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [10].Weng Y, Guan S, Wang L, et al. Defective porous carbon polyhedra decorated with copper nanoparticles for enhanced NIR-driven photothermal cancer therapy. Small. 2020;16:1905184. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [11].Gao J, Wang F, Wang S, et al. Hyperthermia-triggered on-demand biomimetic nanocarriers for synergetic photothermal and chemotherapy. Adv Sci. 2020;7:1903642. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [12].Xie Z, Chen S, Duo Y, et al. Biocompatible two-dimensional titanium nanosheets for multimodal imaging-guided cancer theranostics. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2019;11:22129–22140. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [13].Shao J, Xie H, Huang H, et al. Biodegradable black phosphorus-based nanospheres for in vivo photothermal cancer therapy. Nat Commun. 2016;7:12967. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [14].Hsiao C-W, Chuang E-Y, Chen H-L, et al. Photothermal tumor ablation in mice with repeated therapy sessions using NIR-absorbing micellar hydrogels formed in situ. Biomaterials. 2015;56:26–35. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [15].Blanco E, Shen H, Ferrari M. Principles of nanoparticle design for overcoming biological barriers to drug delivery. Nat Nanotechnol. 2015;33:941–951. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [16].Cheng M, Wang H, Zhang Z, et al. Gold nanorod-embedded electrospun fibrous membrane as a photothermal therapy platform. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2014;6:1569–1575. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [17].De Jong WH, Hagens WI, Krystek P, et al. Particle size-dependent organ distribution of gold nanoparticles after intravenous administration. Biomaterials. 2008;29:1912–1919. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [18].Huang X, Li L, Liu T, et al. The shape effect of mesoporous silica nanoparticles on biodistribution, clearance, and biocompatibility in vivo. ACS Nano. 2011;5:5390–5399. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [19].Sykes EA, Chen J, Zheng G, et al. Investigating the impact of nanoparticle size on active and passive tumor targeting efficiency. ACS Nano. 2014;8:5696–5706. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [20].Chen B, Xiang H, Pan S, et al. Advanced theragenerative biomaterials with therapeutic and regeneration multifunctionality. Adv Funct Mater. 2020;30:2002621. [Google Scholar]
- [21].Yin C, Zhao Q, Li W, et al. Biomimetic anti-inflammatory nano-capsule serves as a cytokine blocker and M2 polarization inducer for bone tissue repair. Acta Biomater. 2020;102:416–426. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [22].Zhang X, Cheng G, Xing X, et al. Near-infrared light-triggered porous AuPd alloy nanoparticles to produce mild localized heat to accelerate bone regeneration. J Phys Chem Lett. 2019;10:4185–4191. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [23].Liu Y, Yu Q, Chang J, et al. Nanobiomaterials: from 0D to 3D for tumor therapy and tissue regeneration. Nanoscale. 2019;11:13678–13708. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [24].Shahbazi MA, Faghfouri L, Ferreira MPA, et al. The versatile biomedical applications of bismuth-based nanoparticles and composites: therapeutic, diagnostic, biosensing, and regenerative properties. Chem Soc Rev. 2020;49:1253–1321. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [25].Ma H, Luo J, Sun Z, et al. 3D printing of biomaterials with mussel-inspired nanostructures for tumor therapy and tissue regeneration. Biomaterials. 2016;111:138–148. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [26].Ma H, Jiang C, Zhai D, et al. A bifunctional biomaterial with photothermal effect for tumor therapy and bone regeneration. Adv Funct Mater. 2016;26:1197–1208. [Google Scholar]
- [27].Deng C, Lin R, Zhang M, et al. Micro/nanometer-structured scaffolds for regeneration of both cartilage and subchondral bone. Adv Funct Mater. 2019;29:1806068. [Google Scholar]
- [28].Cai S-J, Li C-W, Weihs D, et al. Control of cell proliferation by a porous chitosan scaffold with multiple releasing capabilities. Sci Technol Adv Mater. 2017;18:987–996. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [29].Ashammakhi N, Wimpenny I, Nikkola L, et al. Electrospinning: methods and development of biodegradable nanofibres for drug release. J Biomed Nanotechnol. 2009;5:1–19. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [30].Zhi D, Yang T, O’Hagan J, et al. Photothermal therapy. J Control Release. 2020;325:52–71. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [31].Li XS, Ferrel GL, Guerra MC, et al. Preliminary safety and efficacy results of laser immunotherapy for the treatment of metastatic breast cancer patients. Photochem Photobiol Sci. 2011;10:817–821. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [32].Chen WR, Adams RL, Bartels KE, et al. Chromophore-enhanced in vivo tumor cell destruction using an 808-nm diode laser. Cancer Lett. 1995;94:125–131. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [33].Chen WR, Adams RL, Higgins AK, et al. Photothermal effects on murine mammary tumors using indocyanine green and an 808-nm diode laser: an in vivo efficacy study. Cancer Lett. 1996;98:169–173. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [34].Chen WR, Adams RL, Carubelli R, et al. Laser-photosensitizer assisted immunotherapy: a novel modality in cancer treatment. Cancer Lett. 1997;115:25–30. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [35].Chen WR, Carubelli R, Liu H, et al. Laser immunotherapy: a novel treatment modality for metastatic tumors. Mol Biotechnol. 2003;25:37–44. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [36].Chen Z, Zhao P, Luo Z, et al. Cancer cell membrane-biomimetic nanoparticles for homologous-targeting dual-modal imaging and photothermal therapy. ACS Nano. 2016;10:10049–10057. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [37].Zhou J, Lu Z, Zhu X, et al. NIR photothermal therapy using polyaniline nanoparticles. Biomaterials. 2013;34:9584–9592. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [38].Lovell JF, Jin CS, Huynh E, et al. Porphysome nanovesicles generated by porphyrin bilayers for use as multimodal biophotonic contrast agents. Nat Mater. 2011;10:324–332. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [39].Liu S, Pan J, Liu J, et al. Dynamically PEGylated and borate-coordination-polymer-coated polydopamine nanoparticles for synergetic tumor-targeted, chemo-photothermal combination therapy. Small. 2018;14:1703968. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [40].Cui X, Wiler J, Dzaman M, et al. In vivo studies of polypyrrole/peptide coated neural probes. Biomaterials. 2003;24:777–787. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [41].Zha Z, Yue X, Ren Q, et al. Uniform polypyrrole nanoparticles with high photothermal conversion efficiency for photothermal ablation of cancer cells. Adv Mater. 2013;25:777–782. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [42].Zhang C, Pan H, Wang X, et al. Microwave-assisted ultrafast fabrication of high-performance polypyrrole nanoparticles for photothermal therapy of tumors in vivo. Biomater Sci. 2018;6:2750–2756. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [43].Xie C, Zhou W, Zeng Z, et al. Grafted semiconducting polymer amphiphiles for multimodal optical imaging and combination phototherapy. Chem Sci. 2020;11:10553–10570. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [44].Jiang Y, Pu K. Multimodal biophotonics of semiconducting polymer nanoparticles. Acc Chem Res. 2018;51:1840–1849. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [45].Jiang Y, Li J, Zhen X, et al. Dual-peak absorbing semiconducting copolymer nanoparticles for first and second near-infrared window photothermal therapy: a comparative study. Adv Mater. 2018;30:1705980. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [46].Hirsch LR, Stafford RJ, Bankson JA, et al. Nanoshell-mediated near-infrared thermal therapy of tumors under magnetic resonance guidance. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003;100:13549–13554. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [47].Xia MY, Xie Y, Yu CH, et al. Graphene-based nanomaterials: the promising active agents for antibiotics-independent anti-bacterial applications. J Control Release. 2019;307:16–31. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [48].Chen Y, Tan C, Zhang H, et al. Two-dimensional graphene analogues for biomedical applications. Chem Soc Rev. 2015;44:2681–2701. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [49].Gu Z, Zhu S, Yan L, et al. Graphene-based smart platforms for combined cancer therapy. Adv Mater. 2019;31:1800662. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [50].Yang K, Zhang S, Zhang G, et al. Graphene in mice: ultrahigh in vivo tumor uptake and efficient photothermal therapy. Nano Lett. 2010;10:3318–3323. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [51].Chang X, Zhang M, Wang C, et al. Graphene oxide/BaHoF5/PEG nanocomposite for dual-modal imaging and heat shock protein inhibitor-sensitized tumor photothermal therapy. Carbon. 2020;158:372–385. [Google Scholar]
- [52].Robinson JT, Tabakman SM, Liang Y, et al. Ultrasmall reduced graphene oxide with high near-infrared absorbance for photothermal therapy. J Am Chem Soc. 2011;133:6825–6831. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [53].Lu GH, Shang WT, Deng H, et al. Targeting carbon nanotubes based on IGF-1R for photothermal therapy of orthotopic pancreatic cancer guided by optical imaging. Biomaterials. 2019;195:13–22. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [54].Wang L, Shi J, Jia X, et al. NIR-/pH-responsive drug delivery of functionalized single-walled carbon nanotubes for potential application in cancer chemo-photothermal therapy. Pharm Res. 2013;30:2757–2771. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [55].Georgakilas V, Tzitzios V, Gournis D, et al. Attachment of magnetic nanoparticles on carbon nanotubes and their soluble derivatives. Chem Mater. 2005;17:1613–1617. [Google Scholar]
- [56].Liu J, Wang C, Wang X, et al. Mesoporous silica coated single-walled carbon nanotubes as a multifunctional light-responsive platform for cancer combination therapy. Adv Funct Mater. 2015;25:384–392. [Google Scholar]
- [57].Lee S-Y, Shieh M-J. Platinum(II) drug-loaded gold nanoshells for chemo-photothermal therapy in colorectal cancer. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2020;12:4254–4264. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [58].Li S, Gu K, Wang H, et al. Degradable holey palladium nanosheets with highly active 1D nanoholes for synergetic phototherapy of hypoxic tumors. J Am Chem Soc. 2020;142:5649–5656. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [59].Amendoeira A, García LR, Fernandes AR, et al. Light irradiation of gold nanoparticles toward advanced cancer therapeutics. Adv Ther. 2020;3:1900153. [Google Scholar]
- [60].Yao C, Zhang L, Wang J, et al. Gold nanoparticle mediated phototherapy for cancer. J Nanomater. 2016;4:1–29. [Google Scholar]
- [61].Chen Y, Gao Y, Chen Y, et al. Nanomaterials-based photothermal therapy and its potentials in antibacterial treatment. J Control Release. 2020;328:251–262. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [62].Lee H-E, Ahn H-Y, Mun J, et al. Amino-acid- and peptide-directed synthesis of chiral plasmonic gold nanoparticles. Nature. 2018;556:360–365. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [63].Zhu JF, Wang Y, Huo D, et al. Epitaxial growth of gold on silver nanoplates for imaging-guided photothermal therapy. Mater Sci Eng C. 2019;105:110023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [64].Zhan C, Huang Y, Lin G, et al. A gold nanocage/cluster hybrid structure for whole-body multispectral optoacoustic tomography imaging, EGFR inhibitor delivery, and photothermal therapy. Small. 2019;15:1900309. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [65].Luo L, Sun W, Feng Y, et al. Conjugation of a scintillator complex and gold nanorods for dual-modal image-guided photothermal and X-ray-induced photodynamic therapy of tumors. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2020;12:12591–12599. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [66].Jain PK, El-Sayed IH, El-Sayed MA. Au nanoparticles target cancer. Nano Today. 2007;2:18–29. [Google Scholar]
- [67].Manivasagan P, Nguyen VT, Jun SW, et al. Anti-EGFR antibody conjugated thiol chitosan-layered gold nanoshells for dual-modal imaging-guided cancer combination therapy. J Control Release. 2019;311:26–42. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [68].Hao Y, Dong M, Zhang T, et al. Novel approach of using near-infrared responsive PEGylated gold nanorod coated poly (L-lactide) microneedles to enhance the antitumor efficiency of docetaxel-loaded MPEG-PDLLA micelles for treating an A431 tumor. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2017;9:15317–15327. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [69].Park S, Kim H, Lim SC, et al. Gold nanocluster-loaded hybrid albumin nanoparticles with fluorescence-based optical visualization and photothermal conversion for tumor detection/ablation. J Control Release. 2019;304:7–18. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [70].Lee K-S, El-Sayed MA. Dependence of the enhanced optical scattering efficiency relative to that of absorption for gold metal nanorods on aspect ratio, size, end-cap shape, and medium refractive index. J Phys Chem B. 2005;109:20331–20338. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [71].Mackey MA, Ali MRK, Austin LA, et al. 106. The most effective gold nanorod size for plasmonic photothermal therapy: theory and in vitro experiments. J Phys Chem B. 2014;118:1319–1326. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [72].Zhang W, Wang F, Wang Y, et al. pH and near-infrared light dual-stimuli responsive drug delivery using DNA-conjugated gold nanorods for effective treatment of multidrug resistant cancer cells. J Control Release. 2016;232:9–19. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [73].Yeo ELL, Cheah JUJ, Neo DJH, et al. Exploiting the protein corona around gold nanorods for low-dose combined photothermal and photodynamic therapy. J Mater Chem B. 2017;5:254–268. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [74].Shen J, Kim H-C, Mu C, et al. Multifunctional gold nanorods for siRNA gene silencing and photothermal therapy. Adv Mater. 2014;3:1629–1637. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [75].Xia F, Niu J, Hong Y, et al. Matrix metallopeptidase 2 targeted delivery of gold nanostars decorated with IR-780 iodide for dual-modal imaging and enhanced photothermal/photodynamic therapy. Acta Biomater. 2019;89:289–299. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [76].Wang Z, Chen Z, Liu Z, et al. A multi-stimuli responsive gold nanocageehyaluronic platform for targeted photothermal and chemotherapy. Biomaterials. 2014;35:9678–9688. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [77].Yang X, Wang C, Zhang X, et al. Photothermal and adsorption effects of silver selenide nanoparticles modified by different surfactants in nursing care of cancer patients. Sci Technol Adv Mater. 2020;21:584–592. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [78].Khanh LL, Truc NT, Dat NT, et al. Gelatin-stabilized composites of silver nanoparticles and curcumin: characterization, antibacterial and antioxidant study. Sci Technol Adv Mater. 2019;20:276–290. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [79].Manikandan M, Hasan N, Wu HF. Platinum nanoparticles for the photothermal treatment of Neuro 2A cancer cells. Biomaterials. 2013;34:5833–5842. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [80].Wang Q, Wang H, Yang Y, et al. Plasmonic Pt superstructures with boosted near-infrared absorption and photothermal conversion efficiency in the second biowindow for cancer therapy. Adv Mater. 2019;31:1904836. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [81].Zhao Y, Pan H, Lou Y, et al. Plasmonic Cu2–xS nanocrystals: optical and structural properties of copper-deficient copper(I) sulfides. J Am Chem Soc. 2009;131:4253–4261. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [82].Li B, Wang Q, Zou R, et al. Cu7.2S4 nanocrystals: a novel photothermal agent with a 56.7% photothermal conversion efficiency for photothermal therapy of cancer cells. Nanoscale. 2014;6:3274–3282. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [83].Zhou M, Zhang R, Huang M, et al. A chelator-free multifunctional [64Cu]CuS nanoparticle platform for simultaneous micro-PET/CT imaging and photothermal ablation therapy. J Am Chem Soc. 2010;132:15351–15358. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [84].Tian Q, Tang M, Sun Y, et al. Hydrophilic flower-like CuS superstructures as an efficient 980 nm laser-driven photothermal agent for ablation of cancer cells. Adv Mater. 2011;23:3542–3547. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [85].Wang S, Riedinger A, Li H, et al. Plasmonic copper sulfide nanocrystals exhibiting near-infrared photothermal and photodynamic therapeutic effect. ACS Nano. 2015;9:1788–1800. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [86].Yadav V, Roy S, Singh P, et al. 2D MoS2-based nanomaterials for therapeutic, bioimaging, and biosensing applications. Small. 2019;15:1803706. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [87].Chou SS, Kaehr B, Kim J, et al. Chemically exfoliated MoS2 as near-infrared photothermal agents. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2013;52:4160–4164. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [88].Liu T, Wang C, Xing G, et al. Drug delivery with PEGylated MoS2 nano-sheets for combined photothermal and chemotherapy of cancer. Adv Mater. 2014;26:3433–3440. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [89].Geng B, Qin H, Shen W, et al. Carbon dot/WS2 heterojunctions for NIR-II enhanced photothermal therapy of osteosarcoma and bone regeneration. Chem Eng J. 2020;383:123102. [Google Scholar]
- [90].Liu J, Zheng X, Yan L, et al. Bismuth sulfide nanorods as a precision nanomedicine for in vivo multimodal imaging-guided photothermal therapy of tumor. ACS Nano. 2015;9:696–707. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [91].Cheng L, Yuan C, Shen S, et al. Bottom-up synthesis of metal-ion-doped WS2 nanoflakes for cancer theranostics. ACS Nano. 2015;9:11090–11101. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [92].Nene A, Yu XF, Kaithal P, et al. Magnetic iron oxide nanoparticle (IONP) synthesis to applications: present and future. Materials. 2020;13:4644. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [93].Wang XH, Su K, Tan L, et al. Rapid and highly effective noninvasive disinfection by hybrid Ag/CS@MnO2 nanosheets using near-infrared light. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2019;11:15014–15027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [94].De Castro IA, Datta RS, Ou ZJ, et al. Molybdenum oxides-from fundamentals to functionality. Adv Mater. 2017;29:1701619. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [95].Saeed M, Ren W, Wu A. Therapeutic applications of iron oxide based nanoparticles in cancer: basic concepts and recent advances. Biomater Sci. 2018;6:708–725. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [96].Estelrich J, Busquets MA. Iron oxide nanoparticles in photothermal therapy. Molecules. 2018;23:1567. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [97].Ansari SAMK, Ficiarà E, Ruffinatti FA, et al. Magnetic iron oxide nanoparticles: synthesis, characterization and functionalization for biomedical applications in the central nervous system. Materials. 2019;12:465. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [98].Noqta OA, Aziz AA, Usman IA, et al. Recent advances in iron oxide nanoparticles (IONPs): synthesis and surface modification for biomedical applications. J Supercond Nov Magn. 2019;32:779–795. [Google Scholar]
- [99].Zhao Y, Song W, Wang D, et al. Phase-shifted PFH@PLGA/Fe3O4 nanocapsules for MRI/US imaging and photothermal therapy with near-infrared irradiation. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2015;7:14231–14242. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [100].Yang RM, Fu C, Fang J, et al. Hyaluronan-modified superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles for bimodal breast cancer imaging and photothermal therapy. Int J Nanomedicine. 2017;12:197–206. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [101].Liu X, Zhang Y, Wang Y, et al. Comprehensive understanding of magnetic hyperthermia for improving antitumor therapeutic efficacy. Theranostics. 2020;10:3793–3815. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [102].Chen J, Liu J, Hu Y, et al. Metal-organic framework-coated magnetite nanoparticles for synergistic magnetic hyperthermia and chemotherapy with pH-triggered drug release. Sci Technol Adv Mater. 2019;20:1043–1054. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [103].Liu X, Zheng J, Sun W, et al. Ferrimagnetic vortex nanoring-mediated mild magnetic hyperthermia imparts potent immunological effect for treating cancer metastasis. ACS Nano. 2019;13:8811–8825. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [104].Liu W, Li X, Li W, et al. Highly stable molybdenum dioxide nanoparticles with strong plasmon resonance are promising in photothermal cancer therapy. Biomaterials. 2018;163:43–54. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [105].Yin W, Bao T, Zhang X, et al. Biodegradable MoOx nanoparticles with efficient near-infrared photothermal and photodynamic synergetic cancer therapy at the second biological window. Nanoscale. 2018;10:1517–1531. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [106].Yan ZQ, Zhang W. The development of graphene-based devices for cell biology research. Front Mater Sci. 2014;8:107–122. [Google Scholar]
- [107].Sun Z, Zhao Y, Li Z, et al. TiL4-Coordinated black phosphorus quantum dots as an efficient contrast agent for in vivo photoacoustic imaging of cancer. Small. 2017;13:1602896. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [108].Qian X, Gu Z, Chen Y. Two-dimensional black phosphorus nanosheets for theranostic nanomedicine. Mater Horiz. 2017;4:800–816. [Google Scholar]
- [109].Childers DL, Corman J, Edwards M, et al. Sustainability challenges of phosphorus and food: solutions from closing the human phosphorus cycle. Bioscience. 2011;61:117–124. [Google Scholar]
- [110].Huang Y, Qiao J, He K, et al. Degradation of black phosphorus (BP): the role of oxygen and water. Chem Mater. 2016;28:8330–8339. [Google Scholar]
- [111].Sun Z, Xie H, Tang S, et al. Ultrasmall black phosphorus quantum dots: synthesis and use as photothermal agents. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2015;54:11526–11530. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [112].Sun C, Wen L, Zeng J, et al. One-pot solventless preparation of PEGylated black phosphorus nanoparticles for photoacoustic imaging and photothermal therapy of cancer. Biomaterials. 2016;91:81–89. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [113].Yang G, Liu Z, Li Y, et al. Facile synthesis of black phosphorus-Au nanocomposites for enhanced photothermal cancer therapy and surface-enhanced raman scattering analysis. Biomater Sci. 2017;5:2048–2055. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [114].Fu H, Li Z, Xie H, et al. Different-sized black phosphorus nanosheets with good cytocompatibility and high photothermal performance. RSC Adv. 2017;7:14618. [Google Scholar]
- [115].Chen W, Ouyang J, Liu H, et al. Black phosphorus nanosheet-based drug delivery system for synergistic photodynamic/photothermal/chemotherapy of cancer. Adv Mater. 2017;29:1603864. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [116].Liu W, Dong A, Wang B, et al. Current advances in black phosphorus-based drug delivery systems for cancer therapy. Adv Sci. 2021;8:2003033. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [117].Tao W, Zhu X, Yu X, et al. Black phosphorus nanosheets as a robust delivery platform for cancer theranostics. Adv Mater. 2017;29:1603276. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [118].Karlsson LH, Birch J, Halim J, et al. Atomically resolved structural and chemical investigation of single MXene sheets. Nano Lett. 2015;15:4955–4960. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [119].Anasori B, Lukatskaya MR, Gogotsi Y. 2D metal carbides and nitrides (MXenes) for energy storage. Nat Rev Mater. 2017;2:16098. [Google Scholar]
- [120].Khazaei M, Arai M, Sasaki T, et al. Novel electronic and magnetic properties of two-dimensional transition metal carbides and nitrides. Adv Funct Mater. 2013;23:2185–2192. [Google Scholar]
- [121].Xuan J, Wang Z, Chen Y, et al. Organic-base-driven intercalation and delamination for the production of functionalized titanium carbide nanosheets with superior photothermal therapeutic performance. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2016;55:14569–14574. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [122].Lin H, Wang X, Yu L, et al. Two-dimensional ultrathin MXene ceramic nanosheets for photothermal conversion. Nano Lett. 2017;17:384–391. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [123].Lin H, Wang Y, Gao S, et al. Theranostic 2D tantalum carbide (MXene). Adv Mater. 2018;30:1703284. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [124].Liu G, Zou J, Tang Q, et al. Surface modified Ti3C2 MXene nanosheets for tumor targeting photothermal/photodynamic/chemo synergistic therapy. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2017;9:40077–40086. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [125].Liu J, Huang J, Zhang L, et al. Multifunctional metal-organic framework heterostructures for enhanced cancer therapy. Chem Soc Rev. 2021;50:1188–1218. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [126].Zhang K, Meng X, Cao Y, et al. Metal-organic framework nanoshuttle for synergistic photodynamic and low-temperature photothermal therapy. Adv Funct Mater. 2018;28:1804634. [Google Scholar]
- [127].Yang D, Yang G, Yang P, et al. Assembly of Au plasmonic photothermal agent and iron oxide nanoparticles on ultrathin black phosphorus for targeted photothermal and photodynamic cancer therapy. Adv Funct Mater. 2017;27:1700371. [Google Scholar]
- [128].Ji X, Kong N, Wang J, et al. A novel top-down synthesis of ultrathin 2D boron nanosheets for multimodal imaging-guided cancer therapy. Adv Mater. 2018;30:1803031. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [129].Ma H, Feng C, Chang J, et al. 3D-printed bioceramic scaffolds: from bone tissue engineering to tumor therapy. Acta Biomater. 2018;79:37–59. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [130].Moura D, Mano JF, Paiva MC, et al. Chitosan nanocomposites based on distinct inorganic fillers for biomedical applications. Sci Technol Adv Mater. 2016;17:626–643. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [131].Wu K-C, Tseng C-L, Wu -C-C, et al. Nanotechnology in the regulation of stem cell behavior. Sci Technol Adv Mater. 2013;14:054401. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [132].Luo Y, Wei X, Wan Y, et al. 3D printing of hydrogel scaffolds for future application in photothermal therapy of breast cancer and tissue repair. Acta Biomater. 2019;92:37–47. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [133].Miao H, Shen R, Zhang W, et al. Near-infrared light triggered silk fibroin scaffold for photothermal therapy and tissue repair of bone tumors. Adv Funct Mater. 2020;31:2007188. [Google Scholar]
- [134].Zhou L, Xi Y, Xue Y, et al. Injectable self-healing antibacterial bioactive polypeptide-based hybrid nanosystems for efficiently treating multidrug resistant infection, skin-tumor therapy, and enhancing wound healing. Adv Funct Mater. 2019;29:1806883. [Google Scholar]
- [135].Jaikumar D, Sajesh KM, Soumya S, et al. Injectable alginate-O-carboxymethyl chitosan/nano fibrin composite hydrogels for adipose tissue engineering. Int J Biol Macromol. 2015;74:318–326. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [136].Zhou L, Zheng H, Wang S, et al. Biodegradable conductive multifunctional branched poly(glycerol-amino acid)-based scaffolds for tumor/infection-impaired skin multimodal therapy. Biomaterials. 2020;262:120300. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [137].Ma H, Zhou Q, Chang J, et al. Grape seed-inspired smart hydrogel scaffolds for melanoma therapy and wound healing. ACS Nano. 2019;13:4302–4311. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [138].Ku SH, Lee M, Park CB. Carbon-based nanomaterials for tissue engineering. Adv Healthcare Mater. 2013;2:244–260. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [139].Kang ES, Kim DS, Suhito IR, et al. Guiding osteogenesis of mesenchymal stem cells using carbon-based nanomaterials. Nano Converg. 2017;4:2–15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [140].Lu Y, Li L, Li M, et al. Zero-dimensional carbon dots enhance bone regeneration, osteosarcoma ablation, and clinical bacterial eradication. Bioconjugate Chem. 2018;29:2982–2993. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [141].Bai G, Yuan P, Cai B, et al. Stimuli-responsive scaffold for breast cancer treatment combining accurate photothermal therapy and adipose tissue regeneration. Adv Funct Mater. 2019;29:1904401. [Google Scholar]
- [142].Mauro N, Scialabba C, Pitarresi G, et al. Enhanced adhesion and in situ photothermal ablation of cancer cells in surface-functionalized electrospun microfiber scaffold with grapheme oxide. Int J Pharm. 2017;526:167–177. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [143].Zhang J, Li JC, Kawazoe N, et al. Composite scaffolds of gelatin and gold nanoparticles with tunable size and shape for photothermal cancer therapy. J Mater Chem B. 2017;5:245–253. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [144].Chen H, Wang X, Sutrisno L, et al. Folic acid-functionalized composite scaffolds of gelatin and gold nanoparticles for photothermal ablation of breast cancer cells. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2020;8:589905. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [145].Wang X, Kawazoe N, Chen G. Interaction of immune cells and tumor cells in gold nanorod-gelatin composite porous scaffolds. Nanomaterials. 2019;9:1367. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [146].Wang X, Zhang J, Li J, et al. Bifunctional scaffolds for the photothermal therapy of breast tumor cells and adipose tissue regeneration. J Mater Chem B. 2018;6:7728–7736. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [147].Zhao Q, Shi M, Yin C, et al. Dual-wavelength photosensitive nano-in-micro scaffold regulates innate and adaptive immune responses for osteogenesis. Nanomicro Lett. 2021;13:1–20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [148].Das A, Sudhahar V, Chen GF, et al. Endothelial antioxidant-1: a key mediator of copper-dependent wound healing in vivo. Sci Rep. 2016;6:33783. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [149].Wang X, Lv F, Li T, et al. Electrospun micropatterned nanocomposites incorporated with Cu2S nanoflowers for skin tumor therapy and wound healing. ACS Nano. 2017;11:11337–11349. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [150].Dang W, Li T, Li B, et al. A bifunctional scaffold with CuFeSe2 nanocrystals for tumor therapy and bone reconstruction. Biomaterials. 2018;160:92–106. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [151].Wang H, Zeng X, Pang L, et al. Integrative treatment of anti-tumor/bone repair by combination of MoS2 nanosheets with 3D printed bioactive borosilicate glass scaffold. Chem Eng J. 2020;396:125081. [Google Scholar]
- [152].Wang X, Li T, Ma H, et al. A 3D-printed scaffold with MoS2 nanosheets for tumor therapy and tissue regeneration. NPG Asia Mater. 2017;9:376. [Google Scholar]
- [153].Xu H, Lv F, Zhang Y, et al. Hierarchically micro-patterned nanofibrous scaffolds with a nanosized bio-glass surface for accelerating wound healing. Nanoscale. 2015;7:18446–18452. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [154].Yu Q, Han Y, Wang X, et al. Copper silicate hollow microspheres-incorporated scaffolds for chemo-photothermal therapy of melanoma and tissue healing. ACS Nano. 2018;12:2695–2707. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [155].Yu Q, Han Y, Tian T, et al. Chinese sesame stick-inspired nano-fibrous scaffolds for tumor therapy and skin tissue reconstruction. Biomaterials. 2019;194:25–35. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [156].Zhang J, Zhao S, Zhu M, et al. 3D-printed magnetic Fe3O4/MBG/PCL composite scaffolds with multifunctionality of bone regeneration, local anticancer drug delivery and hyperthermia. J Mater Chem B. 2014;2:7583–7595. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [157].Zhang J, Li JC, Chen SW, et al. Preparation of gelatin/Fe3O4 composite scaffolds for enhanced and repeatable cancer cell ablation. J Mater Chem B. 2016;4:5664–5672. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [158].Zhao P, Ge Y, Liu X, et al. Ordered arrangement of hydrated GdPO4 nanorods in magnetic chitosan matrix promotes tumor photothermal therapy and bone regeneration against breast cancer bone metastases. Chem Eng J. 2020;381:122694. [Google Scholar]
- [159].Lu JW, Yang F, Ke QF, et al. Magnetic nanoparticles modified-porous scaffolds for bone regeneration and photothermal therapy against tumors. Nanomedicine. 2018;14:811–822. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [160].Zhang Y, Zhai D, Xu M, et al. 3D-printed bioceramic scaffolds with a Fe3O4/graphene oxide nanocomposite interface for hyperthermia therapy of bone tumor cells. J Mater Chem B. 2016;4:2874–2886. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [161].Dong S, Chen Y, Yu L, et al. Magnetic hyperthermia-synergistic H2O2 self-sufficient catalytic suppression of osteosarcoma with enhanced bone-regeneration bioactivity by 3D-printing composite scaffolds. Adv Funct Mater. 2020;30:1907071. [Google Scholar]
- [162].Yang B, Yin J, Chen Y, et al. 2D-black-phosphorus-reinforced 3D-printed scaffolds: a stepwise countermeasure for osteosarcoma. Adv Mater. 2018;30:1705611. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [163].Xue C, Sutrisno L, Li M, et al. Implantable multifunctional black phosphorus nanoformulation-deposited biodegradable scaffold for combinational photothermal/chemotherapy and wound healing. Biomaterials. 2021;269:120623. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [164].Qian Y, Yuan WE, Cheng Y, et al. Concentrically integrative bioassembly of a three-dimensional black phosphorus nanoscaffold for restoring neurogenesis, angiogenesis, and immune homeostasis. Nano Lett. 2019;19:8990–9001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [165].Midgleg AC, Wei Y, Li Z, et al. Nitric-oxide-releasing biomaterial regulation of the stem cell microenvironment in regenerative medicine. Adv Mater. 2020;32:1805818. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [166].Carpenter AW, Schoenfisch MH. Nitric oxide release: part II. Therapeutic applications. Chem Soc Rev. 2012;41:3742–3752. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [167].Yang Q, Yin H, Xu T, et al. Engineering 2D mesoporous silica@MXene-integrated 3D-printing scaffolds for combinatory osteosarcoma therapy and NO-augmented bone regeneration. Small. 2020;16:1906814. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [168].Yang C, Luo H, Lin H, et al. Niobium carbide MXene augmented medical implant elicits bacterial infection elimination and tissue regeneration. ACS Nano. 2021;15:1086–1099. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [169].Pan S, Yin J, Yu L, et al. 2D MXene-integrated 3D-printing scaffolds for augmented osteosarcoma phototherapy and accelerated tissue reconstruction. Adv Sci. 2019;7:1901511. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [170].Dang W, Ma B, Li B, et al. 3D printing of metal-organic framework nanosheets-structured scaffolds with tumor therapy and bone construction. Biofabrication. 2020;12:025005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [171].Wang L, Long NJ, Li L, et al. Multi-functional bismuth-doped bioglasses: combining bioactivity and photothermal response for bone tumor treatment and tissue repair. Light Sci Appl. 2018; 7:1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [172].Miguez-Pacheco V, Hench LL, Boccaccini AR. Bioactive glasses beyond bone and teeth: emerging applications in contact with soft tissues. Acta Biomater. 2015;13:1–15. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [173].Vallet‐Regí M, Ruiz‐Hernández E. Bioceramics: from bone regeneration to cancer nanomedicine. Adv Mater. 2011;23:5177–5218. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [174].Wang X, Xue J, Ma B, et al. Black bioceramics: combining regeneration with therapy. Adv Mater. 2020;32:2005140. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]