Abstract
The DNA-PK maintains cell survival when DNA damage occurs. In addition, aberrant activation of the DNA-PK induces centrosome amplification, suggesting additional roles for this kinase. Here, we showed that the DNA-PK-p53 cascade induced primary cilia formation (ciliogenesis), thus maintaining the DNA damage response under genotoxic stress. Treatment with genotoxic drugs (etoposide, neocarzinostatin, hydroxyurea, or cisplatin) led to ciliogenesis in human retina (RPE1), trophoblast (HTR8), lung (A459), and mouse Leydig progenitor (TM3) cell lines. Upon genotoxic stress, several DNA damage signaling were activated, but only the DNA-PK-p53 cascade contributed to ciliogenesis, as pharmacological inhibition or genetic depletion of this pathway decreased genotoxic stress-induced ciliogenesis. Interestingly, in addition to localizing to the nucleus, activated DNA-PK localized to the base of the primary cilium (mother centriole) and daughter centriole. Genotoxic stress also induced autophagy. Inhibition of autophagy initiation or lysosomal degradation or depletion of ATG7 decreased genotoxic stress-induced ciliogenesis. Besides, inhibition of ciliogenesis by depletion of IFT88 or CEP164 attenuated the genotoxic stress-induced DNA damage response. Thus, our study uncovered the interplay among genotoxic stress, the primary cilium, and the DNA damage response.
Keywords: DNA-PK, p53, Primary cilium, Autophagy, Genotoxic stress, DNA damage response
Subject terms: Cell biology, Molecular biology
Introduction
Cells are continuously exposed to several stresses from endogenous and exogenous sources. To maintain physiological homeostasis, a diverse range of signaling pathways are activated in cells. In vertebrates, members of the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase-related kinase (PI3KK) superfamily, including ataxia telangiectasia, mutated (ATM), ataxia telangiectasia, mutated and Rad3-related (ATR) and DNA-dependent protein kinase (DNA-PK), initiate signaling in response to DNA damage [1].
DNA-PK is a heterotrimeric complex composed of a catalytic subunit, DNA-PKcs, and two regulatory subunits, Ku70 and Ku80 [2]. Once DNA double-strand breaks occur, Ku heterodimers, the DNA-binding component of DNA-PK, bind to the broken ends of DNA and recruit DNA-PKcs to form an active complex for DNA repair [3, 4]. Thus, DNA-PK plays an important role in the maintenance of genomic stability. DNA-PK-mediated p53 activation maintains cell survival [5]. In response to ionizing radiation, DNA-PK participates in p53 accumulation [6]. Dietary restriction activates DNA-PK-p53 cascade thus suppressing tumor grow [7]. Thus, the DNA-PK-p53 cascade apparently aims to arrest cell cycle progression and prevent tumorigenesis.
The centrosome is composed of two centrioles, the mother and daughter centrioles, and surrounding pericentriolar material [8] and is the main microtubule organizing center for orchestrating microtubule arrays and the mitotic apparatus. It also serves as the base for primary cilium growth [9]. The primary cilium is an immotile, microtubule-based protrusion from the mother centriole that mainly functions as a cellular antenna to sense environmental signaling [10]. This protrusion is composed of a central microtubule-based axoneme and the surrounding ciliary membrane. The microtubules of the axoneme are highly acetylated, which stabilizes the axoneme, and several signaling receptors localize to the ciliary membrane to transduce environmental cues [11]. Thus, the precise control of ciliogenesis is important for maintaining normal growth and differentiation.
Autophagy is a lysosomal degradation process whereby cells degrade and reutilize old organelles and proteins to maintain metabolic homeostasis [12]. It also participates in ciliogenesis [13]. Autophagic flux requires the formation of a double-membraned vesicle, the autophagosome. Once this vesicles forms, it fuses with the lysosome to form an autolysosome, and lysosomal hydrolases degrade the contents within this acidic compartment. Unc-51-like kinase (ULK) 1 and 2 are required for the initiation of autophagy [14]; they activate the class III PI3 kinase (PI3K) complex to promote phagophore formation. ATG7-mediated signaling then promotes autophagosome formation [15]. ATG7 activates ATG12 to promote the formation of the autophagosome precursor and initiates the conversion of LC3 I to LC3 II, a tightly membrane-bound form of LC3, ultimately promoting autophagosome formation [15]. Once the autophagosome forms, it fuses with lysosomes to degrade cytoplasmic organelles.
The primary cilium plays important roles in development and differentiation. Here, we showed that the DNA-PK-p53 cascade induced primary cilia formation, thus maintaining the DNA damage response under genotoxic stress. Treatment with genotoxic drugs led to ciliogenesis in several cell lines. Upon genotoxic stress, the DNA-PK-p53 cascade contributed to ciliogenesis. Interestingly, genotoxic stress also induced autophagy for ciliogenesis. Thus, our study uncovered the interplay among genotoxic stress, the primary cilium, and the DNA damage response.
Materials and methods
Cell culture
Human immortalized retina pigmented epithelial (RPE1) and mouse Leydig progenitor (TM3) cell lines were grown in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle medium (DMEM)-F12, human immortalized trophoblast (HTR8) cells were grown in Roswell Park Memorial Institute (RPMI)-1640 medium, and human adenocarcinomic human alveolar basal epithelial (A459) cells were grown in DMEM. All culture media were supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum, and all cell lines were cultured at 37 °C in a humidified atmosphere of 5% CO2. These cells were regularly examined for mycoplasma contamination by immunoblotting, immunofluorescence, and DAPI staining according to the guidelines.
Drug treatments
Dorsomorphin (AMPKi, S7306, 5 μM), SBI-0206965 (ULK1i, SML 1540, 10 μM), Caffeine (C0750, 2 mM), Ku55933 (ATM inhibitor, SML1109, 10 μM), 3-methyladenine (3-MA, 5142-23-4, 5 mM), cytochalasin D (C2618, 5 μg/ml), NCS (N9162, 0.5 mg/ml), HU (H8627, 2 mM), 7-hydroxy staurosporine (UCN-01, U6508, 100 nM), CPT (232120, 5 μM), pifithrin-α (p53 inhibitor, 506170, 10 μM), and chloroquine (CQ, 50-63-5, 50 μM) were purchased from Sigma, St. Louis, MO. Bafilomycin-A1 (Baf.A1, BML-CM110, 10 nM) was purchased from Enzo, NY, USA. Chk2 inhibitor II (220491, 10 μM) was purchased from Merck Millipore, Darmstadt, Germany. Akt inhibitor IV (124011, 5 µM) was purchased from Cell Signaling, Beverly, MA, USA. Cells were treated with all drugs for 24 h except HU, which added for 72 h to induce prolonged replication stress.
Antibodies
The following antibodies were obtained commercially: anti-histone H2AX (phospho-Ser139; GTX628789), anti-ATM (GTX70103), anti-Ku70 (GTX101820), anti-Ku80 (GTX109985), and anti-actin (AC-15; GTX26276) (GeneTex, Irvine, CA); anti-TFE3 (HPA023881), anti-acetylated-tubulin (T7451), anti-γ-tubulin (T5326), anti-α-tubulin (T9026) and anti-TTBK2 (HPA018113) (Sigma, St. Louis, MO); anti-pericentrin (ab4448), anti-ATM (phospho-Ser1981; ab81292) and anti-CP110 (ab99338) (Abcam, Cambridge, UK); polyclonal anti-IFT88 (13967-1-AP) and anti-ARL13B (17711-1-AP) (Proteintech, Chicago, IL); anti-DNA-PKcs (sc-9051), anti-DNA-PKcs (phospho-Thr2609; sc-101664), and anti-p53 (DO-1; sc-126) (Santa Cruz Biotech, CA, USA); anti-ULK1 (D8H5) rabbit mAb (#8054), anti-ULK1 (phospho-Ser757; #6888), anti-AMPK (#2532), anti-AMPK (phospho-Thr172; 40H9) rabbit mAb (#2535), anti-ATR (#2790), anti-ATR (phospho-Ser428; #2853), anti-LC3A/B (D3U4C) XP (#12741), anti-PCM1 (Q15; #5259), anti-Chk2 (#2662), anti-Chk2 (phospho-Thr68; #2661), anti-Akt (#9272), anti-Akt (phospho-Ser473; #4060), anti-p44/42 MAPK (phosphorylated Erk1/2; #9101), anti-p44/42 MAPK (Erk1/2; #9102), anti-p53 (phospho-Ser15; #9284), anti-Chk1 (2360), anti-Chk1 (phospho-Ser317; #12302), and anti-HSP70 (#4872) (Cell Signaling, Beverly, MA, USA); anti-CEP290 (A301-659A) (Bethyl Laboratories); anti-OFD1 (NBP1-89355) and anti-CEP164 (NBP1-81445) (Novus, Littleton, CO); and anti-ATG7 (EP1759Y; #04-1055) (Merck Millipore, Darmstadt, Germany).
Immunofluorescence microscopy
Cells were grown on glass cover slips at 37 °C before fixation with ice-cold methanol at −20 °C for 6 min. After blocking with 5% BSA for 1 h, the cells were incubated with primary antibodies for 24 h at 4 °C. After extensive washing with PBS, the cells were incubated with fluorescein isothiocyanate- and Cy3-conjugated secondary antibodies (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) for 1 h in the dark. The nuclei were stained simultaneously with 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI, 0.1 μg/ml). After extensive washing, the cover slips were mounted on glass slides in 50% glycerol. Fluorescent cells were examined with an Axio Imager M2 fluorescence microscope (Zeiss, Switzerland). Primary cilia were imaged with an Axio Imager M2 fluorescence microscope (Zeiss, Switzerland) and captured using ZEN pro software (Zeiss, Switzerland). Primary cilia images were created and the length of cilia were measured from z-stacks using add-on features of the ZEN pro software.
RNA interference (RNAi)
DNA-PKcs, Ku70, ATM, Chk2, IFT88, and CEP164 were depleted in human RPE1 cells using annealed siRNAs with the following target sequences:
siDNA-PKcs: 5′-gggcgcuaaucguacugaa [dt] [dt]-3′ [16];
siKu70: 5′-gaugcccuuuacugaaaaa [dt] [dt]-3′ [16];
siATM: 5′-aacauacuacucaaagacauu [dt] [dt]-3′ [16];
siChk2: 5′-aagaaccugaggaccaagaac [dt] [dt]-3′ [16];
siIFT88: 5′-cgacuaagugccagacucauu [dt] [dt]-3′ [17];
siCEP164: 5′-caggugacauuuacuauuuca [dt] [dt]-3′ [18].
Scrambled siRNA (5′-gaucauacgugcgaucaga [dt] [dt]-3′) was purchased from Sigma (Sigma, St. Louis, MO).
For siRNA transfections, 10 μl Lipofectamine 2000 (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) was mixed with 500 μl Opti-MEM (Life Technologies, Grand Island, NY) for 5 min, and 2 μl siRNA (100 μM) in 500 μl Opti-MEM was added to this mixture which was then incubated at room temperature for 20 min before being layered onto cells in 1 ml DMEM/F12 (100 nM working concentration). Cells were harvested for further experiments 72 h after transfection.
To generate recombinant lentivirus, plasmids expressing shRNA or envelope and packaging proteins were cotransfected into 293FT cells (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA), and virus was harvested according to the protocols provided by the Taiwan National RNAi Core Facility. The following short hairpin RNA (shRNA) sequences were introduced into the pLKO.1 vector:
pLKO.1-shluc (5′-ccuaagguuaagucgcccucg-3′) and pLKO.1-shATG7 (5′-gccugcugaggagcucuccau-3′).
Lentiviruses were collected from media of 293FT cells cotransfected with pLKO.1-derived plasmids and the packaging vectors pCMVdelR8.91 and pMD.G according to the protocols provided by the Taiwan National RNAi Core Facility.
Generation of p53 knockout RPE1 cells
The p53 knockout RPE1 cells were kindly gifts from Dr. Won-Jing Wang. The stable p53 knockout RPE1 cells were established and published [19]. Briefly, RNA-guided targeting of p53 in RPE1 cells was performed through co-transfecting of Cas9 plasmid (Addgene Plasmid #41815) and guided-RNA targeting to p53 (5′-GGGCAGCTACGGTTTCCGTCTGG-3′). Cells were examined for the loss of p53 at 5, 6, or 7 days after transfection.
Statistical analysis
All experiments were performed in at least three independent biological replicates and all results are expressed as the mean ± S.D. (the standard error) of three independent experiments, more than 100 cells were counted in each individual group. Differences between two groups were compared using unpaired two-tailed t-tests and ANOVA for multigroup comparisons, for which a P value of < 0.05 was statistically significant.
Results
Genotoxic drugs induce ciliogenesis
To investigate whether genotoxic stress induces formation of the primary cilium, the topoisomerase II inhibitor ETO, a known inducer of DNA double-strand breaks, was used. ETO treatment induced DNA damage, as shown by increased γ-H2AX levels (Fig. 1A, B). Then, primary cilia were examined in a human immortalized retina pigmented epithelium cell line (RPE1), an in vitro model for examining primary cilium formation [20]. Upon ETO treatment, acetylated tubulin, an axoneme marker, protruded from the mother centriole, as shown by CEP164 staining (Fig. 1C). To further confirm whether this acetylated tubulin signal contains an intact ciliary component rather than representing elongation of the mother centriole, other ciliary markers, including a known ciliary membrane protein (Arl13b) and an intraflagellar transporter (IFT88), were examined. Both Arl13b (Fig. 1D), and IFT88 (Fig. 1E), colocalized with acetylated tubulin, suggesting that these primary cilia had intact ciliary structure. Then, the cilia frequency (% of ciliated cells in a population) of RPE1 cells was counted. Upon ETO treatment, the population of ciliated cells increased in a dose- and time-dependent manner (Fig. 1F, G), and the abundance of acetylated tubulin also increased (Fig. 1H), suggesting that ETO induced primary cilia formation. Serum starvation induces ciliogenesis [21]. Despite ETO induced primary cilia formation, the population of ciliated cells induced by ETO was lower than that induced by starvation (Fig. 1I). During serum starvation, ciliogenesis begins with when tau tubulin kinase 2 (TTBK2) is recruited to the mother centriole, followed by phosphorylation of CP110, which caps the distal end of the centriole to prevent ciliogenesis [20]. Then, we examined whether ciliogenesis initiation events during serum starvation also occurred in ETO-treated RPE1 cells. TTBK2 recruitment to the mother centriole and removal of CP110 (Supplementary Fig. S1A, B), were also observed in ETO-treated RPE1 cells. Thus, ETO induces ciliogenesis by normal ciliogenesis initiation events in RPE1 cells.
Next, we examined whether ETO induces ciliogenesis in other cell lines. Human immortalized trophoblasts (HTR8) and mouse Leydig progenitor (TM3) cells grew primary cilia during serum starvation (Fig. 1J, K). Upon ETO treatment, these cell lines also showed the formation of primary cilia. As observed in RPE1 cells, more ciliated cells were observed under serum starvation in HTR8 and TM3 cells. These data suggest that, like serum starvation but not as efficiently, ETO induces primary cilia in all the tested cell lines. Several studies have shown that cancer cells do not grow cilia, but some recent studies have reported that some cancer cell lines, such as the human adenocarcinomic alveolar basal epithelial A549 cell line, are capable of growing primary cilia. These recent findings prompted us to ascertain whether A549 cells grow cilia in the presence of ETO. First, we tested whether A549 cells grew cilia under ciliogenic conditions, including those of serum starvation [18] and actin depolymerization [22]; both serum starvation (Fig. S2A) and actin depolymerization (Supplementary Fig. S2B) facilitated ciliogenesis in A549 cells. Next, we examined whether ETO induced ciliogenesis in A549 cells. Similar to the results in RPE1, TM3, and HTR8 cells, ETO treatment induced ciliogenesis in A549 cells (Supplementary Fig. S2C), and all ciliary components were detected in ETO-treated A549 cells, supporting the hypothesis that ETO induces primary cilia formation in A549 cells (Supplementary Fig. S2D–F). Centrosome amplification (cells with more than three centrosomes) has been observed in ETO-treated cancer cells, such as osteosarcoma cells [16]. However, we only observed promotion of ciliogenesis (Supplementary Fig. S2C), but not centrosome amplification (Supplementary Fig. S2G), in ETO-treated A549 cells. Thus, ETO induces primary cilia formation in immortalized normal cell lines (RPE1, TM3, and HTR8) and in the A549 cancer cell line.
To examine whether ETO-induced ciliogenesis is a general effect of genotoxic stress, rather than a specific response to ETO, other genotoxic stress inducers were evaluated. Neocarzinostatin (NCS), Hydroxyurea (HU), 7-hydroxy staurosporine (UCN-01), and cisplatin (CPT) induced ciliogenesis in RPE1 cells (Supplementary Fig. S3A–D). In addition, CPT treatment induced ciliogenesis in A549 cells (Supplementary Fig. S3E). Collectively, genotoxic stress triggers primary cilia formation.
DNA-PK induces ciliogenesis
Next, we examined whether the DNA damage response contributes to ciliogenesis. We first examined activation of the PI3KK family. Upon ETO treatment, ATM and DNA-PKcs, but not ATR, were activated in a dose-dependent manner in RPE1 and A549 cells (Fig. 2A–C and Supplementary Fig, S4A). To determine the effect of ATM activation on ciliogenesis, ATM activity was inhibited by caffeine, a pan ATM/ATR inhibitor, or Ku55933, an ATM-specific inhibitor. Neither caffeine nor Ku55933 inhibited ETO-induced ciliogenesis in RPE1 and A549 cells (Supplementary Fig. S4B–D). To further confirm this finding, ATM expression was knocked down by siRNA, which efficiently reduced ATM abundance upon transfection in RPE1 cells (Supplementary Fig. S4E). However, ATM depletion had no effect on ETO-induced ciliogenesis (Supplementary Fig. S4F). Thus, ATM activation does not contribute to primary cilia formation in ETO-treated cells.
We then examined whether DNA-PK activation contributes to ETO-induced ciliogenesis. Treatment of cells with the DNA-PK-specific inhibitor vanillin inhibited ETO-induced ciliogenesis (Fig. 2D). To examine whether DNA-PK-induced ciliogenesis is a general effect of genotoxic stress, HU and NCS were evaluated. HU and NCS activated DNA-PK and induced ciliogenesis in RPE1 cells (Supplementary Fig. S4G, H). Treatment of cells with vanillin inhibited HU- and NCS-induced ciliogenesis (Supplementary Fig. S4H), suggesting DNA-PK activation triggered primary cilia formation. Next, the catalytic subunit of DNA-PK (DNA-PKcs) was depleted by siRNA transfection (Fig. 2E), which decreased the frequency and length of ciliated cells (Figs. S4I and 2F, G). In addition, the regulatory subunits of DNA-PK, the Ku70-Ku80 heterodimers, were depleted by siRNA transfection. Depletion of Ku70 leads to reduced expression of Ku80 [23]. Consistent with published results, Ku80 expression was reduced in Ku70-deficient RPE1 cells (Fig. 2H), in which ETO-induced ciliogenesis was reduced (Fig. 2I), supporting DNA-PK induced primary cilia formation in ETO-treated cells. To further confirm this finding, glioblastoma cells, M059K and M059J, were used in our study, as M059K has normal DNA-PKcs while M059J fails to express the DNA-PKcs [24]. Upon ETO treatment, DNA-PKcs was expressed and activated in M059K cells but not in M059J cells (Fig. 2J). Consistently, ETO induced primary cilia formation only in M059K cells (Fig. 2K), suggesting DNA-PK induced ciliogenesis upon ETO treatment. Next, we examined whether DNA-PK participated in serum starvation-induced ciliogenesis. Serum starvation induced primary cilia formation; depletion of DNA-PKcs had no effect on starvation-induced ciliogenesis (Fig. 2L). Thus, DNA-PK induces primary cilia formation upon ETO treatment.
Next, the subcellular localization of activated DNA-PK, as shown by DNA-PKcs phosphorylation, was examined. Under normal conditions, phosphorylated DNA-PKcs was hardly detected in the nucleus, and a mild signal was asymmetrically detected in one centriole at interphase (Supplementary Fig. S5A). The phosphorylated DNA-PKcs signal increased dramatically in the centrosome when cells entered M phase (Supplementary Fig. S5B). ETO induced DNA-PKcs phosphorylation in the nucleus (Supplementary Fig. S5C), and phosphorylated DNA-PKcs was also detected in the basal body (mother centriole, 88.3 ± 5.7% of ciliated cells in a population) and daughter centriole (81.3 ± 5.5% of ciliated cells in a population), as shown by the colocolization of phosphorylated DNA-PKcs with p150glued (marker protein of mother centriole, Supplementary Fig. S5D) and centrobin (marker protein of daughter centriole, Supplementary Fig. S5E). Thus, ETO induces DNA-PKcs phosphorylation in the nucleus, basal body (mother centriole), and daughter centriole.
Activation of p53 induces ciliogenesis
The downstream effectors of PI3KK were further examined. We first evaluated checkpoint kinases. Chk2, but not Chk1, was activated by ETO treatment in RPE1 (Fig. 3A) and A549 (Supplementary Fig. S6A) cells. However, when Chk2 was efficiently depleted by siRNA transfection (Fig. 3B) or inactivated by the Chk2-specific inhibitor Chk2 inhibitor II, the frequency of ciliated cells was not affected (Fig. 3C and Supplementary Fig. S6B), suggesting that Chk2 activation does not contribute to ETO-induced ciliogenesis. We then investigated Akt activation, as DNA-PK activates Akt signaling to promote cell survival under stress [25]. ETO treatment activated Akt (Fig. 3D and Supplementary Fig. S6A). Inhibition of Akt induced robust cell death (about 90% of cell death, Fig. 3E) upon ETO treatment, consistent with the earlier report that inactivation of Akt induces apoptosis [25]. Examining the remaining live cells, we found that inhibition of Akt decreased ETO-induced ciliogenesis in both RPE1 and A549 cells (Fig. 3F and Supplementary Fig. S6C). As robust cell death was observed when Akt was inhibited in RPE1 and A549 cells, Akt expression was knocked down by siRNA, which efficiently reduced Akt abundance upon transfection in RPE1 cells (Fig. 3G). Depletion of Akt had modest effect on cell viability (about 40% of cell death, Fig. 3H), Examining the remaining live cells, however, Akt depletion had no effect on ETO-induced ciliogenesis (Fig. 3I). Thus, Akt activation does not contribute to primary cilia formation in ETO-treated cells.
We then examined p53, as it is a key downstream regulator of DNA-PK and plays an important role in genotoxic stress responses. Upon ETO treatment, total and phosphorylated p53 levels increased in a dose-dependent manner (Fig. 4A–C). Inhibition of p53 by the specific inhibitor pifithrin-α reduced ETO-induced ciliogenesis in RPE1 cells (Fig. 4D); thus, we speculated that p53 might be a crucial regulator. To further confirm the role of p53 in genotoxic stress-induced ciliogenesis, p53 was knocked out by CRISPR-Cas9 genome editing in RPE1 cells (p53 KO cells). The abundance of p53 was not detected in p53 KO cells (Fig. 4E). Upon ETO treatment, phosphorylated and total p53 levels increased in wild-type RPE1 cells but not in p53 KO cells (Fig. 4E–G), supporting p53 is depleted efficiently. Then, we examined whether genotoxic stress-induced ciliogenesis is regulated by p53. Treatment of wild-type RPE1 cells with CPT, HU, UCN-01, ETO, and NCS induced ciliogenesis; however, the frequency of ciliated cells and length of the cilia were reduced dramatically in p53 KO cells (Fig. 4H and Supplementary Fig. S7A), suggesting genotoxic stresses induce ciliogenesis via p53. Next, we examined whether p53 was activated by DNA-PK upon ETO treatment. ETO-activated p53 reduced significantly in DNA-PKcs-deficient cells implying DNA-PK activated p53 (Supplementary Fig. S7B–D). The effect of p53 on DNA-PK activation was also examined. Activation of DNA-PK was not reduced in the p53KO cells when compared with wild-type cells under ETO treatment, suggesting that p53 did not affect DNA-PK activation (Fig. S7E, F). We also examined whether p53 participated in serum starvation-induced ciliogenesis. Serum starvation induced primary cilia formation, and the population of ciliated cells was reduced dramatically in p53KO cells (Fig. 4I). Thus, p53 induces primary cilia formation under genotoxic stresses and serum starvation. The subcellular localizations of p53 and phosphorylated p53 were further examined. Under normal conditions, p53 (Fig. 4J) and phosphorylated p53 was hardly detected (Fig. 4K). ETO induced both p53 and phosphorylated p53 in the nucleus but not in the basal body (mother centriole) or daughter centriole. Thus, unlike the subcellular localization of activated DNA-PKcs, ETO induces abundances of p53 and phosphorylated p53 only in the nucleus. Collectively, genotoxic stress triggers primary cilia formation via p53.
Autophagy induces ciliogenesis
Cellular stresses activate autophagy to maintain cell survival or induce apoptosis [12]. Autophagy also participates in ciliogenesis by degrading OFD1 during serum deprivation [13]. This finding prompted us to examine whether autophagy participates in ETO-induced ciliogenesis. First, we examined whether ETO treatment induces autophagy. The LC3 puncta were hardly detected in unstressed cells. However, upon ETO treatment, LC3 puncta increased throughout the cytoplasm in RPE1 (Fig. 5A, B) and A549 (Supplementary Fig. S8A, B) cells, suggesting that autophagy was affected. LC3 puncta might result from accelerated autophagic flux or reduced autophagic degradation; thus, LC3 was analyzed by immunoblotting. Upon ETO treatment, LC3 I levels were reduced in RPE1 (Fig. 5C) and A549 (Supplementary Fig. S8C) cells. In addition, LC3 II to I ratio increased upon ETO treatment (Fig. 5D); however, LC3 II to actin ratio was not significantly affected (Fig. 5E). Furthermore, the levels of p62 reduced significantly (Fig. 5F, G). The data imply that more LC3 I was converted to LC3 II, followed by lysosomal degradation. To further confirm this finding, the cells were treated with chloroquine (CQ), a well-established lysosomal inhibitor, and the conversion of LC3 II to I was examined. More LC3 II to I ratio was observed in ETO-treated or serum starvation-cultured cells than in control cells, supporting that more LC3 I was converted to LC3 II (Supplementary Fig. S8D). This result was further confirmed by cotreating RPE1 cells with ETO and Bafilomycin A1 (Baf.A1, an autophagic flux inhibitor) (Supplementary Fig. S8E). Thus, the data suggest that ETO induces autophagic flux. During serum deprivation, activated autophagic flux removes OFD1 from the centriolar satellite for ciliogenesis [13]. Therefore, we examined the abundance of OFD1 in the centriolar satellite. ETO treatment induced ciliogenesis, and OFD1 was displaced from the centriolar satellite (Supplementary Fig. S8F). However, genetic depletion of ATG7, DNA-PK, or p53 could not reverse displaced OFD1 phenotype upon ETO treatment (Supplementary Fig. S8G). The data show that ETO activates autophagic flux; however, OFD1 displacement is independent of autophagy and DNA-PK-p53 cascade upon ETO treatment.
Next, we examined whether ETO-induced autophagy contributes to ciliogenesis. Autophagic degradation was blocked by treating cells with Baf.A1, and the frequency of ciliated cells was counted. ETO induced ciliogenesis, and the frequency of ciliated cells was decreased in Baf.A1-treated RPE1 cells (Fig. 6A). This finding was further confirmed by treating cells with 3-Methyladenine (3-MA), an inhibitor of autophagy initiation (Fig. 6B). In A549 cells, treatment with CQ decreased ETO-induced ciliogenesis (Fig. 6C). To confirm that these results were not due to off-target effects of these drugs, a genomic approach was adopted. ATG7 expression was depleted by infecting RPE1 cells with lentivirus containing shRNA against ATG7 (Fig. 6D). Infection of lentivirus containing shRNA against luciferase (control) had no effect on ETO-induced ciliogenesis, but the frequency (Fig. 6E) and length (Fig. 6F) of ciliated cells were reduced in ATG7-deficient cells. Next, the involvement of AMPK-ULK1 complex was examined. Both serum starvation and ETO treatment activated AMPK and ULK1 as shown by increased phosphorylation of AMPK at Thr172 and of ULK1 at Ser555 (active form) and reduced phosphorylation of ULK1 at Ser757 (inactive form) (Fig. 6G–I). Inhibition of AMPK and ULK1 by selective inhibitors dorsomorphin and SBI-0206965, respectively, alleviated ETO-induced ciliogenesis (Fig. 6J), suggesting ETO-activated AMPK-ULK1 complex induced ciliogenesis. Thus, ETO-induced autophagy facilitates ciliogenesis.
We then examined whether ETO-induced autophagy was regulated by DNA-PK-p53 cascade. ETO treatment increased LC3 II to I ratio in wild-type cells, and this was reduced in DNA-PKcs- or p53-deficient cells (Fig. 7A, B). To further strengthen the role of DNA-PK-p53 cascade over autophagy, activation of ULK1 and degradation of p62 was examined. Surprisingly, depletion of DNA-PKcs or p53 affect neither ULK1 activation nor p62 degradation (Fig. 7C–E). The data imply that ETO-activated DNA-PK-p53 cascade affects LC3 lipidation but not the flux of autophagy. DNA damage activates transcription factor E3 (TFE3) [26] and nuclear translocation of TFE3 promotes autophagy [27]. We then checked whether activation of TFE3 (nuclear translocation of TFE3) was regulated by DNA-PK-p53 cascade. ETO treatment facilitated nuclear translocation of TFE3 (Supplementary Fig. S9A); however, genomic depletion of DNA-PKcs or p53 did not affect TFE3 activation (Supplementary Fig. S9B, C), suggesting TFE3 was not regulated by DNA-PK-p53 cascade upon ETO treatment. The effect of autophagy on DNA-PK-p53 cascade was further examined. Depletion of ATG7 affected neither DNA-PK (Fig. 7F) nor p53 (Fig. 7G) activation upon ETO treatment. The data suggest that DNA-PK-p53 cascade and autophagy are independent pathways triggered by genotoxic stress.
Primary cilia maintain DNA damage response
Some centrosomal and ciliary proteins contribute to nuclear events. We thus ascertained whether ETO-induced primary cilia play a role in the DNA damage response. IFT88 and CEP164 are required for ciliogenesis; thus, the effects of primary cilia on the DNA damage response were examined in CEP164- and IFT88-deficient cells. CEP164 expression was efficiently depleted by siRNA transfection (Fig. 8A), which reduced the frequency of ciliated cells (Fig. 8B). Moreover, ETO induced DNA-PKcs phosphorylation, an indicator of DNA-PK activation, but this phosphorylation was reduced in CEP164-deficient RPE1 cells (Fig. 8C). This phenotype was further confirmed in IFT88-deficient cells (Supplementary Fig. S10A–C). The data suggest that primary cilia maintain DNA-PK activation. We then determined the effect of primary cilia on p53 activation. Similar to the results for DNA-PK, p53 activation by ETO treatment was reduced in CEP164-deficient cells (Fig. 8D). However, p53 was not reduced when cells were treated with ETO at lethal dose (200 μM). These data suggest that ETO-induced primary cilia maintain DNA-PK and p53 activation.
We next tested whether removal of genotoxic stress reduced ciliogenesis. RPE1 cells were treated with ETO for 24 h for ciliogenesis followed by washing with PBS and cultured in ETO-free medium for 6 and 24 h (Fig. 8E). Six hours after ETO washout, the percentage of ciliated cells reduced and more deciliated cells were observed 24 h after ETO washout (Fig. 8F). Thus, genotoxic stress sustains primary cilia formation.
Discussion
Here, we showed that genotoxic stress facilitated primary cilium formation via the DNA-PK-p53 cascade and autophagy. Interestingly, DNA-PK-p53 cascade did not activate autophagy and vice versa. Moreover, stress-induced ciliogenesis was crucial for maintaining the DNA damage response (Fig. S11). Thus, our study unraveled the interplay among genotoxic stress, the primary cilium, and the DNA damage response.
Serum deprivation and genotoxic stress induced primary cilia formation in RPE1 cells. Depletion of DNA-PKcs inhibited ciliogenesis induced by genotoxic stress but not by serum deprivation (Fig. 2F, L). However, either genotoxic stress- or serum deprivation-induced ciliogenesis reduced significantly in p53 KO cells (Fig. 4H, I). Thus, DNA-PK-p53 cascade contributed to genotoxic stress-induced ciliogenesis and only p53 engaged in starvation-induced ciliogenesis, implying different signaling cascade are activated for ciliogenesis upon different cellular stresses. How does DNA-PK-p53 cascade regulate primary ciliogenesis remains unclear. Genotoxic stresses activate DNA-PK-p53 cascade for primary cilia formation. Activated DNA-PKcs localized to both nucleus and centrioles, p53 was only detected in the nucleus. We speculated that DNA-PK regulates ciliogenesis might via its nuclear and centriolar functions. p53 is a transcription factor that regulates several gene expression for regulating cell cycle progression. Interestingly, a study demonstrates a novel role of p53 in promoting differentiation of airway epithelial progenitors with motile cilia [28]. Thus, we propose that, in the nucleus, DNA-PK activates p53 thus inducing gene expressions for ciliogenesis. Activated p53 was not detected in the centrioles. Thus, in the centriole, DNA-PK might participate in orchestrating primary cilia by forming complex with other centriolar proteins or phosphorylating distinct signaling cascade for inducing or maintaining ciliogenesis. The hypothesis still needs to be further deciphered in the future.
Here we show that genotoxic stresses induce ciliogenesis; whereas disruption of primary cilia formation reduces DNA damage signaling. It remains unclear how cytoplasmic cilia affect nuclear signals. The role of primary cilia in the maintenance of DNA damage response is supported by previous finds that centrosomes contain several components participate in DNA damage responses [29]. Besides, several cilia-related proteins participate in DNA damage response. For example, CEP164 forms a complex with both ATM and ATR and is phosphorylated by these two kinases. This process is important for activating other DNA damage response components [30]. Interestingly, depletion of KIF3A reduces ciliogenesis and loss of cell cycle arrest in response to DNA damage due to reduced p53 activation [31]. Consistently, we found that disruption of ciliogenesis led to reduced DNA-PK and p53 activation. DNA-PK was found both in the nucleus and centrioles, we thus speculate that the shuttling of DNA-PK between nucleus and centrioles might play a role in maintaining DNA damage response. However, this hypothesis still needs to be further examined.
p53 plays roles in regulating autophagy [32]. In the nucleus, p53 induces Sestrin1 and Sestrin2 to activate the AMPK, thereby inhibiting mTOR [33, 34]. In the cytoplasm, p53-mediated proapoptotic factors such as p53-inducible BH3-only protein (PUMA) also contribute to activation of autophagy [35]. Our data showed that genotoxic stresses induced DNA-PK-p53 cascade. However, genomic depletion of DNA-PKcs or p53 did not affect ULK1 or TFE3 activation and p62 degradation, only LC3 lipidation was affected. We thus speculate that DNA-PK-p53 cascade and autophagy are independent pathways triggered by genotoxic stress but may still have some crosstalk. The detail interplay among DNA damage response and autophagy still need to be elucidated in the future.
In summary, we show that the DNA-PK-p53 cascade and autophagy induce primary cilia formation to maintain the DNA damage response under genotoxic stress. Thus, our study deciphered the molecular mechanism by which genotoxic stress induces primary cilium formation and uncovered the novel function of the primary cilium in maintaining the DNA damage response.
Supplementary information
Acknowledgements
We thank the National RNAi Core Facility at Academia Sinica in Taiwan for providing shRNA reagents and related services. We are grateful for the support from the Core Research Laboratory, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University. We appreciate Dr. Won-Jing Wang (Institute of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, National Yang Ming University) for providing p53 knockout RPE1 cell line. This study was supported by grants from the Ministry of Science and Technology (MOST109-2320-B-006-042-MY3 and MOST106-2320-B-006-056-MY3) to Chia-Yih Wang.
Author contributions
T.K.T., B.M.H., and C.Y.W. designed the research. T.Y.C., Y.Y.C., X.Y.X., P.R.L., and L.Y.Y. performed the research. B.M.H. and C.Y.W. analyzed the data. T.Y.C., T.K.T., and C.Y.W. wrote the paper.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Footnotes
Edited by E. Baehrecke
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary information
The online version of this article (10.1038/s41418-020-00713-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
References
- 1.Durocher D, Jackson SP. DNA-PK, ATM and ATR as sensors of DNA damage: variations on a theme? Curr Opin Cell Biol. 2001;13:225–31. doi: 10.1016/S0955-0674(00)00201-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Blackford AN, Jackson SP. ATM, ATR, and DNA-PK: the trinity at the heart of the DNA damage response. Mol Cell. 2017;66:801–17. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2017.05.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Neal JA, Meek K. Choosing the right path: does DNA-PK help make the decision? Mutat Res. 2011;711:73–86. doi: 10.1016/j.mrfmmm.2011.02.010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Goodwin JF, Knudsen KE. Beyond DNA repair: DNA-PK function in cancer. Cancer Discov. 2014;4:1126–39. doi: 10.1158/2159-8290.CD-14-0358. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Woo RA, McLure KG, Lees-Miller SP, Rancourt DE, Lee PW. DNA-dependent protein kinase acts upstream of p53 in response to DNA damage. Nature. 1998;394:700–4. doi: 10.1038/29343. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Boehme KA, Kulikov R, Blattner C. p53 stabilization in response to DNA damage requires Akt/PKB and DNA-PK. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2008;105:7785–90. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0703423105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Ma D, Chen X, Zhang PY, Zhang H, Wei LJ, Hu S, et al. Upregulation of the ALDOA/DNA-PK/p53 pathway by dietary restriction suppresses tumor growth. Oncogene. 2018;37:1041–8. doi: 10.1038/onc.2017.398. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Nigg EA, Stearns T. The centrosome cycle: centriole biogenesis, duplication and inherent asymmetries. Nat Cell Biol. 2011;13:1154–60. doi: 10.1038/ncb2345. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Satir P, Pedersen LB, Christensen ST. The primary cilium at a glance. J Cell Sci. 2010;123:499–503. doi: 10.1242/jcs.050377. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Nachury MV, Mick DU. Establishing and regulating the composition of cilia for signal transduction. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2019;20:389–405. doi: 10.1038/s41580-019-0116-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Wang CY, Tsai HL, Syu JS, Chen TY, Su MT. Primary cilium-regulated EG-VEGF signaling facilitates trophoblast invasion. J Cell Physiol. 2017;232:1467–77. doi: 10.1002/jcp.25649. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Hoyer-Hansen M, Jaattela M. Autophagy: an emerging target for cancer therapy. Autophagy. 2008;4:574–80. doi: 10.4161/auto.5921. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Tang Z, Lin MG, Stowe TR, Chen S, Zhu M, Stearns T, et al. Autophagy promotes primary ciliogenesis by removing OFD1 from centriolar satellites. Nature. 2013;502:254–7. doi: 10.1038/nature12606. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Ganley IG, Lam du H, Wang J, Ding X, Chen S, Jiang XULK1. ATG13.FIP200 complex mediates mTOR signaling and is essential for autophagy. J Biol Chem. 2009;284:12297–305. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M900573200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Mizushima N, Noda T, Yoshimori T, Tanaka Y, Ishii T, George MD, et al. A protein conjugation system essential for autophagy. Nature. 1998;395:395–8. doi: 10.1038/26506. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Wang CY, Huang EY, Huang SC, Chung BC. DNA-PK/Chk2 induces centrosome amplification during prolonged replication stress. Oncogene. 2015;34:1263–9. doi: 10.1038/onc.2014.74. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Delaval B, Bright A, Lawson ND, Doxsey S. The cilia protein IFT88 is required for spindle orientation in mitosis. Nat Cell Biol. 2011;13:461–8. doi: 10.1038/ncb2202. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Graser S, Stierhof YD, Lavoie SB, Gassner OS, Lamla S, Le Clech M, et al. Cep164, a novel centriole appendage protein required for primary cilium formation. J Cell Biol. 2007;179:321–30. doi: 10.1083/jcb.200707181. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Izquierdo D, Wang WJ, Uryu K, Tsou MF. Stabilization of cartwheel-less centrioles for duplication requires CEP295-mediated centriole-to-centrosome conversion. Cell Rep. 2014;8:957–65. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2014.07.022. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Goetz SC, Liem KF, Jr, Anderson KV. The spinocerebellar ataxia-associated gene Tau tubulin kinase 2 controls the initiation of ciliogenesis. Cell. 2012;151:847–58. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2012.10.010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Puustinen P, Keldsbo A, Corcelle-Termeau E, Ngoei K, Sonder SL, Farkas T, et al. DNA-dependent protein kinase regulates lysosomal AMP-dependent protein kinase activation and autophagy. Autophagy. 2020;16:1871–88. doi: 10.1080/15548627.2019.1710430. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Drummond ML, Li M, Tarapore E, Nguyen TTL, Barouni BJ, Cruz S, et al. Actin polymerization controls cilia-mediated signaling. J Cell Biol. 2018;217:3255–66. doi: 10.1083/jcb.201703196. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Wang CY, Kao YH, Lai PY, Chen WY, Chung BC. Steroidogenic factor 1 (NR5A1) maintains centrosome homeostasis in steroidogenic cells by restricting centrosomal DNA-dependent protein kinase activation. Mol Cell Biol. 2013;33:476–84. doi: 10.1128/MCB.01064-12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Daido S, Yamamoto A, Fujiwara K, Sawaya R, Kondo S, Kondo Y. Inhibition of the DNA-dependent protein kinase catalytic subunit radiosensitizes malignant glioma cells by inducing autophagy. Cancer Res. 2005;65:4368–75. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-04-4202. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Bozulic L, Surucu B, Hynx D, Hemmings BA. PKBalpha/Akt1 acts downstream of DNA-PK in the DNA double-strand break response and promotes survival. Mol Cell. 2008;30:203–13. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2008.02.024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Brady OA, Jeong E, Martina JA, Pirooznia M, Tunc I, Puertollano R. The transcription factors TFE3 and TFEB amplify p53 dependent transcriptional programs in response to DNA damage. Elife. 2018;7:e40856. doi: 10.7554/eLife.40856. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Martina JA, Diab HI, Lishu L, Jeong AL, Patange S, Raben N, et al. The nutrient-responsive transcription factor TFE3 promotes autophagy, lysosomal biogenesis, and clearance of cellular debris. Sci Signal. 2014;7:ra9. doi: 10.1126/scisignal.2004754. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.McConnell AM, Yao C, Yeckes AR, Wang Y, Selvaggio AS, Tang J, et al. p53 regulates progenitor cell quiescence and differentiation in the airway. Cell Rep. 2016;17:2173–82. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2016.11.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Mullee LI, Morrison CG. Centrosomes in the DNA damage response—the hub outside the centre. Chromosome Res. 2016;24:35–51. doi: 10.1007/s10577-015-9503-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Sivasubramaniam S, Sun X, Pan YR, Wang S, Lee EY. Cep164 is a mediator protein required for the maintenance of genomic stability through modulation of MDC1, RPA, and CHK1. Genes Dev. 2008;22:587–600. doi: 10.1101/gad.1627708. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Lu D, Rauhauser A, Li B, Ren C, McEnery K, Zhu J, et al. Loss of Glis2/NPHP7 causes kidney epithelial cell senescence and suppresses cyst growth in the Kif3a mouse model of cystic kidney disease. Kidney Int. 2016;89:1307–23. doi: 10.1016/j.kint.2016.03.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Maiuri MC, Galluzzi L, Morselli E, Kepp O, Malik SA, Kroemer G. Autophagy regulation by p53. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 2010;22:181–5. doi: 10.1016/j.ceb.2009.12.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Feng Z, Zhang H, Levine AJ, Jin S. The coordinate regulation of the p53 and mTOR pathways in cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2005;102:8204–9. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0502857102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Budanov AV, Karin M. p53 target genes sestrin1 and sestrin2 connect genotoxic stress and mTOR signaling. Cell. 2008;134:451–60. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2008.06.028. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Yee KS, Wilkinson S, James J, Ryan KM, Vousden KH. PUMA- and Bax-induced autophagy contributes to apoptosis. Cell Death Differ. 2009;16:1135–45. doi: 10.1038/cdd.2009.28. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.