Skip to main content
PMC home page
Scientific Reports logoLink to Scientific Reports
. 2021 Jun 7;11:11933. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-91345-6

Establishment of in-hospital clinical network for patients with neurofibromatosis type 1 in Nagoya University Hospital

Yoshihiro Nishida 1,2,✉, Kunihiro Ikuta 2, Atsushi Natsume 3, Naoko Ishihara 4, Maki Morikawa 5, Hiroyuki Kidokoro 6, Yukako Muramatsu 6, Norie Nonobe 7, Kanako Ishizuka 8, Takuya Takeichi 9, Miki Kanbe 10, Seiji Mizuno 11, Shiro Imagama 2, Norio Ozaki 8
PMCID: PMC8184989  PMID: 34099792

Abstract

Neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) is a genetic multisystem disorder. Clinicians must be aware of the diverse clinical features of this disorder in order to provide optimal care for it. We have set up an NF1 in-hospital medical care network of specialists regardless of patient age, launching a multidisciplinary approach to the disease for the first time in Japan. From January 2014 to December 2020, 246 patients were enrolled in the NF1 patient list and medical records. Mean age was 26.0 years ranging from 3 months to 80 years. The number of patients was higher as age at first visit was lower. There were 107 males (41%) and 139 females. After 2011, the number of patients has increased since the year when the medical care network was started. Regarding orthopedic signs, scoliosis was present in 60 cases (26%), and bone abnormalities in the upper arm, forearm, and tibia in 8 cases (3.5%). Neurofibromas other than cutaneous neurofibromas were present in 90 cases (39%), and MPNST in 17 cases (7.4%). We launched a multidisciplinary NF1 clinic system for the first time in Japan. For patients with NF1, which is a hereditary and systemic disease associated with a high incidence of malignant tumors, it will be of great benefit when the number of such clinics in Japan and the rest of Asia is increased.

Subject terms: Preventive medicine, Sarcoma

Introduction

Neurofibromatosis type-1 (NF1) is a hereditary disease that affects 1 in 2500–3000 people regardless of gender or ethnicity1, 2. Diagnosis is made with reference to the diagnostic criteria of the Japanese Dermatological Association, which were prepared based on the diagnostic criteria proposed by the National Institute of Health in 19883. There is a remarkable phenotypic difference and an unpredictable lifelong course of the condition4. NF1 is characterized by the development of Café au lait plaques and benign neurofibromas1. Comorbidities that occur in adulthood include malignant tumors, central nervous system tumors, angiopathy, and cognitive impairment1, 5–7. Up to 60% of NF1 patients develop plexiform neurofibromas, which can cause pain, disfigurement, and malignant changes8. Malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor (MPNST) is the most common and serious malignant tumor based on NF1, and the risk of developing it in a lifetime is reported to be 5.9–15.8%9–11. Patients with NF1 have been reported to develop malignancies at a 2.7–4 times higher risk than the general population12–14, and life expectancy is reduced by 8–20 years15, 16.

Thus, for NF1 patients who have various signs/symptoms and a high incidence of malignant tumors that have a great influence on the life prognosis, it is inappropriate to treat them in a single department. In the United States, the Neurofibromatosis Clinic Network was established by the Children's Tumor Foundation in 2007 to standardize and raise the level of clinical care for neurofibromatosis nationwide and integrate research into clinical care practices (https://www.ctf.org/research/nf-clinic-network). There are now 63 accredited institutions located in 32 states, and each institution has a multidisciplinary approach to NF1 patients17. On the other hand, in Japan, there was no multidisciplinary NF1 clinic, and so NF1 medical treatment was performed only by a specialist in a single department generally for one manifestation. There were many problems such as delays in medical treatment for other symptoms in NF1 caused by medical treatment in a single department. In order to overcome these problems, we have built and promoted an in-hospital NF1 medical care network with multiple departments and specialties since 2014. The purpose of this study is to introduce the process of launching this NF1 medical care network and its progress.

Materials and methods

At our hospital, a working group for the establishment of the NF1 in-hospital medical care network was formed in 2013 by members of pediatrics, neurosurgery, orthopedics, and genetic counselors who have been involved in NF1 medical care. This working group discussed and decided the outlines of medical care network for NF1: departments in charge of medical treatment; flowchart of medical treatment by multiple departments; symptoms that should be noted in medical treatment for NF1 patients according to age. In this process, we had the cooperation of a pediatric/clinical geneticist instructor (S. M.) at the Aichi Developmental Disability Center as an advisor. With the consent of the chairman of each department involved in NF1 medical care, the NF1 in-hospital medical care network of Nagoya University Hospital was established. This network is managed by the director of the Genome Medical Center.

In January 2014, we started multidisciplinary medical care through the NF1 in-hospital medical care network (Fig. 1). For example, if the patient is 15 years old or younger, pediatrics, ophthalmology, neurosurgery, orthopedics are regarded as essential departments, and the items to be treated in each department are evaluated (Table 1). If the patient/family wishes, genetic counseling will be provided by a certified genetic counselor. In addition to the four core departments, the network consists of dermatologists, plastic surgeons, psychiatrists, genetic counselors, child life specialists, and medical social workers (Table 2). We distribute pamphlets explaining this NF1 medical care network to related hospitals and clinics of our hospital and have them refer NF1 patients to our hospital.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Open in a new tab

Medical treatment flow for NF1 patients under 15 years old in our institution.

Table 1.

Items to be evaluated by each department in NF1 patients up to 15 years old.

Department Mandatory or not Items
Pediatrics Mandatory Physical/mental developmental retardation, high blood pressure, exophthalmos, sexual maturity
Ophthalmology Mandatory Sight, intraocular pressure, iris nodule, optic nerve glioma
Neurosurgery Mandatory Brain tumor, hydrocephalus, optic nerve glioma
Orthopedics Mandatory Scoliosis, limb dysplasia, deep-seated neurofibroma, MPNST
Dermatology, Plastic Surgery, Psychiatry, Otorhinolaryngology, Others If patient/family wish Skin lesions, cutaneous neurofibromatosis, diffuse neurofibromatosis, developmental disability, hearing, explanation/support to family members, etc
Open in a new tab

Table 2.

Medical staff involved in NF1 medical care and related items.

Medical staff
Genetic counselor Consultation on heredity, patient/family support
Child life specialist Partner of childhood, mental support before and after surgery
Medical social worker Explanation of the medical insurance system, assistance for various economic, psychological and social problems
Open in a new tab

Since the NF1 in-hospital medical care network was launched in January 2014, medical records of NF1 patients who have been seen in this network have been prospectively created. Orthopedic oncologists (Y.N., K.I.) have been in charge of preparing these medical records. The contents are the date of the first visit to our hospital, age at the time of the first visit, gender, family history (including whether familial NF1 or non-familial NF1 is present), the department in which the examination is to be performed and NF1-related signs/symptoms in each department. Based on this record, we investigated the progress of this in-hospital NF1 medical care network since its start. We also conducted an epidemiological survey of NF1-related symptoms in orthopedics from the medical records. This practice and research was conducted in accordance with the principles set out in the Declaration of Helsinki.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Ethical approval was given by the institutional review board at the Nagoya University. The need for informed consent was waived by the retrospective design of the study based on anonym data.

Results

In January 2014, we started the NF1 in-hospital medical care network. For NF1 patients who had their first visit before then and had been continuously treated, we requested each department to provide medical care as an NF1 network. Therefore, NF1 patients whose first visit date was before 2014 are also included in the medical records of NF1 network.

From January 2014 to December 2020, 246 patients were enrolled in the NF1 patient list and medical records. Excluding the three patients whose age at the first visit was unknown, mean age was 26.0 years ranging from 3 months to 80 years. The younger the age at the first visit, the higher the patient number distribution (Fig. 2).

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Open in a new tab

Number of NF1 patients by age group at first visit.

There were 107 males (41%) and 139 females. Looking at the number of first-time patients by age group by gender, the number of males in their 20 s and 30 s was markedly lower than that of females (Fig. 3).

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Open in a new tab

Number of NF1 patients by gender. (A) total, (B) male by age group at first visit, (C) females by age group at first visit.

Divided by 5 years, the number of first-time NF1 patients is increasing markedly. Especially after 2011, the number of patients has increased since the year when the medical care network was started (Fig. 4). Excluding 15 patients whose family history is unknown, familial NF1 was 101 (44%), and non-familial was 130, with non-familial slightly predominant.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Open in a new tab

Number of NF1 patients by year. (A) year range separated by 5 years. (B) recent years. The dotted line indicates the time when the NF1 in-hospital medical care network was started.

Regarding orthopedic signs, there was a description that was investigated in 230 patients. Scoliosis was present in 60 cases (26%), and bone abnormalities in the upper arm, forearm, and tibia were observed in 8 cases (3.5%). Neurofibromas other than cutaneous ones were found in 90 cases (39%) and MPNST in 17 cases (7.4%) (Fig. 5).

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Open in a new tab

Diseases treated by orthopedic surgeons. Ratio to the total number of patients. Neurofibroma: deep-seated neurofibroma counted. Cutaneous neurofibroma not counted.

Discussion

There have been no reports in the English literature of multidisciplinary NF1 clinics conducting medical care in Asia including Japan. It is often difficult for NF1 patients to be treated in many departments each time because of the hospital system or the staff who can handle them. There are several reports of NF1 clinics in Western countries, especially pediatric NF1 clinics. A report from Northern Ireland described the treatment of NF1 patients under the age of 16 years with an average of 4.6 years18. In Australia, the average age at consultation is 5 years and the male–female ratio is 1.05:119.

Setting up an NF1 clinic for adults is more difficult than for children. In Australia, at the age of 18, individuals with NF1 must be transitioned to the adult health care system, for most adults with NF1 patients being treated by general practitioners who are in charge of referrals to specialists. However, most general medical practitioners have no training in the management of NF1. In a recent Australian study, most adult NF1 patients have not undergone regular disease monitoring since the transition from pediatrics to adulthood, and importantly, some adult NF1 patients developed new complications in adulthood, such as spinal-related medical conditions and chronic pain20. There was a report of an adult NF1 clinic in Canada, where the average age of patients was 32.6 years21. This report states that among adult NF1 patients, only 9% were referred from pediatric centers that were seeing NF1, suggesting the difficulty in transition to adult NF1 care. This study also found that there are six other adult NF1 clinics worldwide reported, two in the United States22, 23, 2 Australian facilities19, 24, 1 Brazilian facility25, and 1 French facility26. Of these, only one facility sees only adult NF1 patients23, while the others treat adults together with children. In the present study, the transition was considered to be successful in our hospital, as almost all patients could continue to be treated by the multidisciplinary team excluding pediatricians after the age of 16. However, it seems that the reason why the number of patients up to teenagers is large in our hospital might be that parents take the initiative to send their NF1 children to our NF1 clinic. The decrease in the number of NF1 patients over the age of 20 years may be a problem in Adolescence and Young Adult generation27. In addition, the decrease in the number of male NF1 patients between the ages of 20 and 39 is considered to affect the difference in the number of male and female NF1 patients in the present study.

Even if an adult consults the NF1 clinic, it is important to decide how intensely he/she needs to be treated. Due to the wide clinical spectrum expressed in NF1 patients, it is difficult to determine appropriate levels for adult monitoring and the infrequent occurrence of most complications28. Age-specific monitoring of symptoms and education of patients are important in managing NF1 patients. Adults with severe or complex symptoms need to attend an NF1 clinic, but adult NF1 patients with only mild symptoms need to know when to seek medical advice29. Symptoms such as rapid expansion of existing tumors, chronic pain, and neurological deficits require immediate medical attention and prompt examination and treatment5, 13, 20, 29. Personal education and support in self-management is important in the care of long-term NF1-related disorders30. An important matter in self-care is to activate the consciousness of the patient31, which means that NF1 individuals are ready to take action to manage their healthcare32. Increasing the level of interest improves health-related outcomes31, 33. Annual clinical surveillance is recommended for all NF1 individuals, however, there is evidence that some adults do not comply with these guidelines7, 20. Taken all together, in our hospital, we explain the importance of regular visits to patients with adult NF1 and have them understand the signs of suspected development of MPNST. We believe that it is important for them to be aware of such symptoms and to have them visit our hospital as soon as they notice them.

NF1 has been selected as one of 333 designated intractable diseases in Japan (Designated intractable disease No. 34) (https://www.nanbyou.or.jp/entry/3991). When the severity exceeds a certain level, the specified medical expenses subsidy system is applied based on the Intractable Diseases Law in Japan. However, many doctors are not familiar with the designated intractable disease system, and so some NF1 patients do not receive medical assistance appropriately. In that sense, it is also important to consolidate NF1 patients in our hospital and give them the opportunity to benefit from medical assistance appropriately. Since registry system has not been completely established in Japan yet, it is unknown how many NF1 patients there actually are. If the efforts of NF1 clinics like our hospital spread all over Japan and NF1 clinics can be established in each region, with the establishment of a registry system, accurate epidemiological data of NF1 patients will become available in the future.

The COVID-19 pandemic has greatly affected the medical field. NF1 clinical care in the United States has also been greatly affected. A study by Radtke et al. indicated that about two thirds of the NF1 clinics reported a greater than 50% decrease in the number of available patient appointments, and modified clinical surveillance and research protocols34. In Japan as well, the decrease in the number of examinees delays the detection of disease, and results in a decrease in medical income. However, even under such circumstances, the number of patients who visited our in-hospital NF1 clinic increased in 2020. This may be because of the strong interest in this first such NF1 clinic in Japan and differences in the influence of the pandemic between the United States and Japan.

As an initiative of All Japan, the Japanese Society of Recklinghausen Disease has set up a medical care network at multiple facilities in Japan with the aim of consolidating NF1 medical care (http://plaza.umin.ac.jp/~jsrd/network/index.html). In addition, the society is actively conducting academic activities with the aim of equalizing NF1 medical care in Japan. These are very meaningful activities for NF1 patients and their families. However, since the number of doctors and facilities that can specialize in NF1 medical care listed on the academic society network is still small, patients and their families may need to travel long distances to receive medical treatment from these specialists. It is necessary to increase the number of NF1 clinics in Japan so that comprehensive NF1 medical care can be performed in a single facility like our hospital.

There are several limitations in our report. First of all, it may not be possible to extract all the information from the medical record, and the incidence of each disease (scoliosis, deep-seated neurofibromatosis, etc.) may be higher. Second, because the orthopedic oncologist has created a list and a record of NF1 patients who have been treated on the medical care network, it is possible that NF1 patients who have not been treated by an orthopedic oncologist are missing from the list. However, we request that all NF1 patients treated in related departments be referred to orthopedics. Third, the data may contain a selection bias, as initially severely symptomatic NF1 patients were referred to this NF1 clinic. However, recently, the number of patients, who are referred when they are diagnosed with NF1 or when Café au lait spots are observed at birth, is increasing, and so it may become like population based data in the future. Fourth, in this research, we cannot provide scientific information at present. However, in the future, it will be possible to use this registry to accumulate data such as whole body MRI that is prospectively imaged to detect deep-seated plexiform neurofibroma, and send out scientific data. Finally, this clinical care does not include nurses that specialize in NF1 practice, and will be necessary in the near future.

Conclusions

We have launched what is probably the first multidisciplinary NF1 clinic system in Asia. For patients with NF1, which is a hereditary and systemic disease with a high incidence of malignant tumors, it would be a great relief to increase the number of such clinics in Japan and the rest of Asia.

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank all the medical staff of our hospital, patients and families for their cooperation in the medical care of NF1 Clinic in Nagoya University Hospital.

Abbreviations

NF1

Neurofibromatosis type 1

MPNST

Malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor

Author contributions

Performed the study design: Y.N., K.I., A.N., N.I., M.M., S.M., N.O. Performed data collection: Y.N., K.I., A.N., M.M., H.K., Y.M., N.N., K.I., T.T., M.K., S.I. Performed data interpretation: Y.N., N.O. Drafted manuscript: Y.N. Revised manuscript: Y.N., K.I., A.N., N.I., M.M., H.K., Y.M., N.N., K.I., T.T., M.K., S.I. S.M., S.I., N.O. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported in part by the National Cancer Center Research and Development Fund (29-A-3) and Health and Labor Sciences Research Grant (H29-013).

Data availability

The datasets supporting the conclusions of this article are available from the corresponding author (YN) on reasonable request.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Footnotes

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

  • 1.Huson SM, Harper PS, Compston DA. Von Recklinghausen neurofibromatosis. A clinical and population study in south-east Wales. Brain J. Neurol. 1988;111(Pt 6):1355–1381. doi: 10.1093/brain/111.6.1355. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Lammert M, Friedman JM, Kluwe L, Mautner VF. Prevalence of neurofibromatosis 1 in German children at elementary school enrollment. Arch. Dermatol. 2005;141(1):71–74. doi: 10.1001/archderm.141.1.71. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Neurofibromatosis Conference statement. National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Conference. Arch. Neurol. 1988;45(5):575–578. doi: 10.1001/archneur.1988.00520290115023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Friedman JM, Birch PH. Type 1 neurofibromatosis: A descriptive analysis of the disorder in 1728 patients. Am. J. Med. Genet. 1997;70(2):138–143. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1096-8628(19970516)70:2<138::AID-AJMG7>3.0.CO;2-U. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Creange A, Zeller J, Rostaing-Rigattieri S, et al. Neurological complications of neurofibromatosis type 1 in adulthood. Brain J Neurol. 1999;122(Pt 3):473–481. doi: 10.1093/brain/122.3.473. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Ferner RE, Hughes RA, Weinman J. Intellectual impairment in neurofibromatosis 1. J. Neurol. Sci. 1996;138(1–2):125–133. doi: 10.1016/0022-510X(96)00022-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Jett K, Friedman JM. Clinical and genetic aspects of neurofibromatosis 1. Genet. Med. 2010;12(1):1–11. doi: 10.1097/GIM.0b013e3181bf15e3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Ferner RE. The neurofibromatoses. Pract. Neurol. 2010;10(2):82–93. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.2010.206532. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Evans DG, Baser ME, McGaughran J, Sharif S, Howard E, Moran A. Malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumours in neurofibromatosis 1. J. Med. Genet. 2002;39(5):311–314. doi: 10.1136/jmg.39.5.311. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.McCaughan JA, Holloway SM, Davidson R, Lam WW. Further evidence of the increased risk for malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumour from a Scottish cohort of patients with neurofibromatosis type 1. J. Med. Genet. 2007;44(7):463–466. doi: 10.1136/jmg.2006.048140. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Spurlock G, Knight SJ, Thomas N, Kiehl TR, Guha A, Upadhyaya M. Molecular evolution of a neurofibroma to malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor (MPNST) in an NF1 patient: Correlation between histopathological, clinical and molecular findings. J. Cancer Res. Clin. Oncol. 2010;136(12):1869–1880. doi: 10.1007/s00432-010-0846-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Seminog OO, Goldacre MJ. Risk of benign tumours of nervous system, and of malignant neoplasms, in people with neurofibromatosis: Population-based record-linkage study. Br. J. Cancer. 2013;108(1):193–198. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2012.535. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Yohay K. Neurofibromatosis type 1 and associated malignancies. Curr. Neurol. Neurosci. Rep. 2009;9(3):247–253. doi: 10.1007/s11910-009-0036-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Zoller ME, Rembeck B, Oden A, Samuelsson M, Angervall L. Malignant and benign tumors in patients with neurofibromatosis type 1 in a defined Swedish population. Cancer. 1997;79(11):2125–2131. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0142(19970601)79:11<2125::AID-CNCR9>3.0.CO;2-N. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Evans DG, O'Hara C, Wilding A, et al. Mortality in neurofibromatosis 1: In North West England: An assessment of actuarial survival in a region of the UK since 1989. Eur. J. Hum. Genet. 2011;19(11):1187–1191. doi: 10.1038/ejhg.2011.113. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Masocco M, Kodra Y, Vichi M, et al. Mortality associated with neurofibromatosis type 1: A study based on Italian death certificates (1995–2006) Orphan. J. Rare Dis. 2011;6:11. doi: 10.1186/1750-1172-6-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Merker VL, Dai A, Radtke HB, Knight P, Jordan JT, Plotkin SR. Increasing access to specialty care for rare diseases: A case study using a foundation sponsored clinic network for patients with neurofibromatosis 1, neurofibromatosis 2, and schwannomatosis. BMC Health Serv. Res. 2018;18(1):668. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-3471-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.McKeever K, Shepherd CW, Crawford H, Morrison PJ. An epidemiological, clinical and genetic survey of neurofibromatosis type 1 in children under sixteen years of age. Ulst. Med. J. 2008;77(3):160–163. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Noble F, Kornberg AJ, Elder JE, Delatycki MB. Retrospective analysis of patients attending a neurofibromatosis type 1 clinic. J. Paediatr. Child Health. 2007;43(1–2):55–59. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1754.2007.01003.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Oates EC, Payne JM, Foster SL, Clarke NF, North KN. Young Australian adults with NF1 have poor access to health care, high complication rates, and limited disease knowledge. Am. J. Med. Genet. Part A. 2013;161a(4):659–666. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.a.35840. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Mansouri A, Ghadakzadeh S, Maqbool T, et al. Neurofibromatosis clinic: A report on patient demographics and evaluation of the clinic. Can. J. Neurol. Sci. 2017;44(5):577–588. doi: 10.1017/cjn.2016.326. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Beckman E, Akbarnia BA. The cardinal Glennon Children's Hospital neurofibromatosis clinic model. Neurofibromatosis. 1988;1(3):134–136. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Wang DL, Smith KB, Esparza S, et al. Emotional functioning of patients with neurofibromatosis tumor suppressor syndrome. Genet. Med. 2012;14(12):977–982. doi: 10.1038/gim.2012.85. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.North K. Neurofibromatosis type 1: Review of the first 200 patients in an Australian clinic. J. Child Neurol. 1993;8(4):395–402. doi: 10.1177/088307389300800421. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Trovó-Marqui AB, Goloni-Bertollo EM, Valério NI, et al. High frequencies of plexiform neurofibromas, mental retardation, learning difficulties, and scoliosis in Brazilian patients with neurofibromatosis type 1. Braz. J. Med. Biol. Res. 2005;38(9):1441–1447. doi: 10.1590/S0100-879X2005000900020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Wolkenstein P, Durand-Zaleski I, Moreno JC, Zeller J, Hemery F, Revuz J. Cost evaluation of the medical management of neurofibromatosis 1: A prospective study on 201 patients. Br. J. Dermatol. 2000;142(6):1166–1170. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2133.2000.03543.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Bleyer A, Barr R, Hayes-Lattin B, Thomas D, Ellis C, Anderson B. The distinctive biology of cancer in adolescents and young adults. Nat. Rev. Cancer. 2008;8(4):288–298. doi: 10.1038/nrc2349. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Huson SM. What level of care for the neurofibromatoses? Lancet (Lond., Engl.). 1999;353(9159):1114–1116. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(98)00155-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Ferner RE, Huson SM, Thomas N, et al. Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of individuals with neurofibromatosis 1. J. Med. Genet. 2007;44(2):81–88. doi: 10.1136/jmg.2006.045906. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Giarelli E, Bernhardt BA, Mack R, Pyeritz RE. Adolescents' transition to self-management of a chronic genetic disorder. Qual. Health Res. 2008;18(4):441–457. doi: 10.1177/1049732308314853. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Donald M, Ware RS, Ozolins IZ, Begum N, Crowther R, Bain C. The role of patient activation in frequent attendance at primary care: A population-based study of people with chronic disease. Patient Educ. Couns. 2011;83(2):217–221. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2010.05.031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Hibbard JH, Greene J. What the evidence shows about patient activation: Better health outcomes and care experiences; fewer data on costs. Health Affairs (Project Hope) 2013;32(2):207–214. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2012.1061. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Mosen DM, Schmittdiel J, Hibbard J, Sobel D, Remmers C, Bellows J. Is patient activation associated with outcomes of care for adults with chronic conditions? J. Ambulatory Care Manag. 2007;30(1):21–29. doi: 10.1097/00004479-200701000-00005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Radtke HB, Klein-Tasman BP, Merker VL, et al. The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on neurofibromatosis clinical care and research. Orphan. J. Rare Dis. 2021;16(1):61. doi: 10.1186/s13023-021-01711-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

The datasets supporting the conclusions of this article are available from the corresponding author (YN) on reasonable request.

Articles from Scientific Reports are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES