Skip to main content
. 2021 Jun 1;10:e66612. doi: 10.7554/eLife.66612

Figure 4. PreNMDARs contribute significantly to burst-induced facilitation and spike transfer.

(A) Representative images showing expression of GFP-Cre (left) and ChIEF-tdTomato (right) in the DG of control and Grin1-cKO animals. (B) Representative AMPAR-EPSCs from control (left) and Grin1-cKO (right) CA3 pyramidal neurons recorded at V= −65 mV and evoked by optical burst-stimulation (5 pulses at 25 Hz) of stratum lucidum. Blue arrows indicate light stimulation. (C) Summary plot of burst-induced facilitation measured as P5/P1 ratio of optical responses; facilitation was significantly reduced in Grin1-cKO animals as compared to control (Grin1-cKO 187 ± 16%, n = 12 cells, nine animals; control 255 ± 22%, n = 9 cells, eight animals; Grin1-cKO vs control, p=0.0167, unpaired t-test). (D) Burst stimulation induced KAR-EPSCs were isolated and recorded as described in Figure 3, bath application of MK-801 (50 µM) significantly reduced facilitation (baseline 601 ± 107%, MK-801 464 ± 84%, n = 13 cells, 10 animals; baseline vs MK-801, p=0.00042, paired t-test). In (D) and (E) of this figure: representative traces (left), representative experiment (middle), and summary plot (right). (E) Burst-induced facilitation was stable in interleaved, naïve slices (baseline 369 ± 45%, naïve 367 ± 48%, n = 9 cells, nine animals; p=0.863, paired t-test). (F) Bath application of MK-801 (50 µM) reduced KAR-mediated action potentials induced by burst-stimulation (baseline 0.93 ± 0.17, MK-801 0.46 ± 0.09, n = 6 cells, five animals; p=0.036, Wilcoxon signed-rank test). In (F) and (G) of this figure: representative traces (top), representative experiment and summary plot (bottom). (G) Stable KAR-mediated action potentials in interleaved naïve slices (baseline 0.76 ± 0.07, naïve 0.88 ± 0.1, n = 6 cells, five animals; p=0.2084, Wilcoxon signed-rank test). NBQX (10 µM) was applied at the end of all experiments in (D–G). Data are presented as mean ± s.e.m. *p<0.05; ****p<0.001.

Figure 4.

Figure 4—figure supplement 1. PreNMDARs contribute to burst-induced facilitation in more physiological conditions: 1.2 mM Mg+2, 1.2 mM Ca+2 and 35°C.

Figure 4—figure supplement 1.

KAR-EPSCs were recorded from CA3 pyramidal cells loaded with 2 mM MK-801 in the presence of 15 µM LY303070 and 100 µM picrotoxin. (A) Bath application of MK-801 (50 µM) significantly reduced burst-induced facilitation elicited by 5 pulses, 25 Hz (baseline 450 ± 67%, MK-801 366 ± 63%, n = 6 cells, four animals; baseline vs MK-801, p=0.036, Wilcoxon signed-rank test). In (A) and (B) of this figure: representative traces (left), representative experiment (middle), and summary plot (right). (B) Burst-induced facilitation was stable in interleaved, naïve slices (baseline 462 ± 63%, naïve 481 ± 71%, n = 5 cells, four animals; p=0.281, Wilcoxon signed-rank test). Data are presented as mean ± s.e.m. *p<0.05.
Figure 4—figure supplement 2. PreNMDARs contribute to action potential firing elicited by AMPAR-mediated transmission.

Figure 4—figure supplement 2.

(A) Bath application of MK-801 (50 µM) reduced action potentials induced by 5 pulses at 25 Hz burst stimulation (baseline 2.47 ± 0.27, MK-801 1.9 ± 0.24, n = 6 cells, five animals; p=0.036, Wilcoxon signed-rank test). In (A) and (B) of this figure: representative traces (top), representative experiment, and summary plot (bottom). (B) Stable action potential firing in interleaved naïve slices (baseline 1.55 ± 0.24, naïve 1.61 ± 0.23, n = 6 cells, five animals; p=0.402, Wilcoxon signed-rank test). DCG-IV (1 µM) was applied at the end of all experiments in (AB). Data are presented as mean ± s.e.m. *p<0.05.
Figure 4—figure supplement 3. Intracellular MK-801 effectively blocked postsynaptic NMDARs elicited by burst stimulation (5 pulses at 25 Hz).

Figure 4—figure supplement 3.

Representative NMDAR-EPSCs (Vh = +40 mV) from CA3 pyramidal neurons patch-loaded with 2 mM MK-801 (left) or naïve internal solution (right). Mf inputs were stimulated with a bipolar electrode (theta-glass pipette) in stratum lucidum in the presence of picrotoxin (100 µM) and NBQX (10 µM). NMDAR currents were recorded at V= +40 mV (gray shaded area) followed by a voltage jump to −70 mV in iMK-801 conditions and −50 mV in naïve recordings. Bath application of MK-801 (50 µM) blocked NMDAR currents of the fifth pulse to a similar magnitude as iMK-801 (n = 5 cells, four animals per condition; U = 0.21, Mann–Whitney test). Data are presented as mean ± s.e.m.