Skip to main content
Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology logoLink to Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology
. 2021 May 26;9:674103. doi: 10.3389/fcell.2021.674103

Pathological Crosstalk Between Oxidized LDL and ER Stress in Human Diseases: A Comprehensive Review

Divya Saro Varghese 1, Bassam R Ali 1,2,*
PMCID: PMC8187772  PMID: 34124059

Abstract

The oxidative modification of the major cholesterol carrying lipoprotein, oxLDL, is a biomarker as well as a pathological factor in cardiovascular diseases (CVD), type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), obesity and other metabolic diseases. Perturbed cellular homeostasis due to physiological, pathological and pharmacological factors hinder the proper functioning of the endoplasmic reticulum (ER), which is the major hub for protein folding and processing, lipid biosynthesis and calcium storage, thereby leading to ER stress. The cellular response to ER stress is marked by a defensive mechanism called unfolded protein response (UPR), wherein the cell adapts strategies that favor survival. Under conditions of excessive ER stress, when the survival mechanisms fail to restore balance, UPR switches to apoptosis and eliminates the defective cells. ER stress is a major hallmark in metabolic syndromes such as diabetes, non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), neurological and cardiovascular diseases. Though the pathological link between oxLDL and ER stress in cardiovascular diseases is well-documented, its involvement in other diseases is still largely unexplored. This review provides a deep insight into the common mechanisms in the pathogenicity of diseases involving oxLDL and ER stress as key players. In addition, the potential therapeutic intervention of the targets implicated in the pathogenic processes are also explored.

Keywords: ER stress sensors, UPR arm, human disease, HDL, oxidized LDL, therapy

Introduction

Over the past few decades, dysregulated cholesterol and lipid homeostasis have contributed to the worldwide rapid progression of lifestyle diseases, collectively termed the metabolic syndrome (MetS) or syndrome X. It is estimated that over a billion people are affected by this global epidemic (Saklayen, 2018). This new non-communicable disease is characterized by a combination of dyslipidemia, cardiometabolic disorders, hypertension, insulin resistance, type II diabetes mellitus (T2DM), obesity, non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFD) and non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) (Amihăesei and Chelaru, 2014). The anomalies manifested in these systemic diseases primarily target the cardiovascular system, liver, pancreas and kidney that eventually lead to chronic and lethal effects on the individual. Oxidized low-density lipoprotein (oxLDL) plays a pivotal role in dyslipidemia associated MetS (Berneis and Krauss, 2002). In this review, we explore human metabolic diseases involving the pathological interaction between oxLDL and Endoplasmic Reticulum (ER) stress that culminate in morbidity. Further, it would provide a better insight on identifying common targets and biomarkers for improved prognosis, diagnosis and therapy.

Lipids: An Overview

Lipids are comprised of triglycerides, phospholipids, sterols, and fat-soluble vitamins; of which triglycerides and cholesterol are the major sources of fat found in the blood. Lipid metabolism is the collective process of synthesis and degradation of lipids and their derivatives within or outside- cellular compartments. The composition of lipids varies from cell to cell, depending on the structure and function of the organelle. In addition to contributing to the structural organization of the cell by providing building blocks that maintain membrane plasticity, lipids play dynamic roles in membrane trafficking and signal transduction (Grouleff et al., 2015; Santos and Preta, 2018). By reason of its structural as well as functional relevance, lipid metabolism is a tightly regulated process that is influenced by the balance between endogenous or de novo synthesis of cholesterol and its exogenous or dietary intake in the body (Gliozzi et al., 2021).

Cholesterol

Cholesterol is a lipid molecule that belongs to the family of polycyclic compounds known as sterols. The term cholesterol is coined from Ancient Greek -chole (bile) and stereos (solid), suffixed by –ol for its alcohol group (Morzycki, 2014). Cholesterol accounts for 30–40% of the animal cell membrane composition, which is more than any other biomolecule (Pinkwart et al., 2019). Ever since its discovery and isolation from bile and gallstones by Poulletier de la Salle in 1769, as documented by Dam et al. (1959), cholesterol has fascinated physiologists, biochemists, and clinicians due to its physiological and pathological influence on normal cellular functions. Despite being structurally as well as functionally significant, the toxic accumulation of cholesterol in the cell in animals leads to debilitating effects on the whole organism. Cholesterol homeostasis is influenced not only by various intrinsic factors such as genetics, body weight, circadian rhythms and endocrine factors but also by external therapeutic and nutritional factors (Pallottini et al., 2004; Santosa et al., 2007; Alphonse and Jones, 2016).

Cholesterol Biosynthesis

Although almost all animal cells synthesize cholesterol, the liver is the principal source of cholesterol synthesis and contributes to more than 50% of the body’s requirement (Repa and Mangelsdorf, 2000). Owing to the multi-faceted nature of cholesterol and the complexity of de novo synthesis, the latter has several checkpoints throughout its progression and the intermediates serve as precursors for bile, vitamin, and steroid hormones that play vital roles in other cellular processes (Cerqueira et al., 2016). Cholesterol biosynthesis is a concerted process that occurs in the ER involving more than 20 enzymes that are synthesized in the ER. An elaborate description of all the enzymes and steps involved in the pathway is not discussed in this review and the reader is referred to other reviews (Trzaskos and Gaylor, 1985; Howe et al., 2017). It can be subdivided into five major steps consisting of the mevalonate pathway, followed by a series of reactions that lead to the formation of isoprenes, squalenes and sterols. HMG-CoA reductase (HMG-CoR) involved in the last step of the mevalonate synthesis plays dual roles of being the rate limiting enzyme as well as the check point for feedback mechanisms. It is the most regulated enzyme in the body that is monitored and modulated at all stages, ranging from transcription and translation level to its activity and degradation. Accordingly, HMG-CoR is of immense therapeutic significance in a number of dyslipidemic disorders (Jiang et al., 2018).

Mevalonate is subsequently converted to isoprenes such as isopentanyl 5-pyrophosphate and dimethylallyl pyrophosphate. Further condensation results in the formation of a 30-carbon molecule, squalene, which serves as the precursor for all steroids. Squalene monooxygenase (SM), also known as Squalene epoxidase, catalyses the first oxygenation step of the process. It is the second rate-limiting enzyme of sterol synthesis pathway and has now started to gain attention as a key regulator of cholesterol synthesis (Gill et al., 2011; Yoshioka et al., 2020). The consequential modification of squalene produces the four –ring compound lanosterol that further transforms into cholesterol either by adopting the Bloch pathway or the Kandutsch-Russel Pathway through a series of complex mechanisms. While the former pathway uses Δ 24 unsaturated sterols and produces desmasterol which may be converted to cholesterol, the intermediate metabolites produced by the latter pathway are saturated sterols that eventually terminate in 7-hydroxycholesterol (Cerqueira et al., 2016). Thus, the fate of lanosterol is determined by the cell type in which it is synthesized and the cells’ requirement of steroids.

Lipoproteins as Mediators of Cholesterol and Lipid Recycling and Transport

Due to its hydrophobic and cytotoxic nature, cholesterol is esterified at its hydroxyl group by ACAT 1 located in the ER and translocated to the plasma membrane and other peripheral tissues (Lange et al., 2014; Litvinov et al., 2018). While newly synthesized cholesterol transport occurs against a steep concentration gradient, with the expenditure of energy, retrograde transport of cholesterol from the plasma membrane and other peripheral tissues to the ER of hepatocytes for its esterification is non-energy dependent. The cholesteryl esters are either stored along with triglycerides as cytosolic lipid droplets in hepatocytes as well as other cell types or transported as lipoproteins with the aid of carrier proteins termed apolipoproteins (Brown and Goldstein, 1986). Lipid homeostasis in the tissue and plasma are regulated by these lipoproteins along with lipoprotein receptors, lipolytic enzymes and transfer proteins (Shepherd, 1994). At different stages of its life cycle, lipoproteins are referred to as chylomicrons, chylomicron remnants, low-density lipoprotein (LDL), very low-density lipoprotein (VLDL), intermediate density lipoprotein (IDL) and high-density lipoprotein (HDL) and Lipoprotein (a) [Lp(a)], based on their size, lipid concentration and apolipoproteins associated with it (Feingold et al., 2000).

In the liver, cholesteryl esters, triglycerides and phospholipids are packaged with the apolipoprotein B-100 (ApoB100) and released into the circulation as VLDLs (Ference et al., 2020). The lipid core comprised of sequestered cholesteryl esters and triglycerides is covered by a monolayer of phosphatidylcholine- the structural lipoprotein -lipoprotein. This packaging enables the transport and uptake of its contents with the aid of tissue specific cell receptors. The extrahepatic tissues recognize specific apolipoproteins on the lipoproteins and deplete the triglyceride levels in these lipoprotein complexes with the help of specific lipases. For instance, while lipoprotein lipase (LPL) acts on ApoB containing lipoproteins, hepatic lipases prefer Apo-A1 containing lipoproteins. Conversely, as the VLDLs progress to form LDLs in the plasma, it undergoes further modification characterized by a reduction in lipid core mass coupled with – the addition of ApoC2 and ApoE -thereby increasing its density. ApoE can also associate with HDL particles as the latter in size and decrease in density. Hence, VLDLs that target the adipocytes contain the highest lipid to protein ratio, compared to the IDL and LDL with intermediate and lowest levels, respectively (David, 2017).

Low-density lipoproteins are captured by the transmembrane LDL receptor (LDLR) that recognize the ApoB100 lipoprotein. LDLR is produced in the ER and matures in the Golgi complex (Goldstein and Brown, 2009). The LDL-LDLR complex is internalized in clathrin-coated vesicles to form early and late endosomes that eventually fuse with lysosomes to form endolysosomes. The acidic pH in the endosome favors the dissociation of LDLR from the complex and its recycling to the plasma membrane to continue the trafficking. The cholesterol esters are hydrolyzed to free cholesterol and fatty acids in the early endosomes and carried to the Golgi complex. The membrane bound- NPC1 and luminal NPC2 (Niemann-Pick C) proteins located in lysosomes regulate the Golgi to ER trafficking of cholesterol (Wang et al., 2010). Like HMG-CoR and SCAP (SREBP cleavage activating protein), these proteins also carry the sterol sensing domain through which they modulate cholesterol uptake. In addition to the NPC proteins, oxysterol binding protein (OSP)-related protein (ORP) family located on lysosomes also contribute to lysosome mediated sterol metabolism and transport (Soccio and Breslow, 2004; Wilhelm et al., 2017). Hepatocytes, macrophages and other peripheral cells that express the transmembrane LDLR are recipients of LDL cargo.

Dietary triglycerides and cholesterol are absorbed by the enterocytes that package the fats along with ApoC2 and ApoB48 apolipoproteins to form chylomicrons. The chylomicrons enter the plasma through the lymphatic system and are transferred to extrahepatic tissues that recognize the ApoC2 residues. After secretion, they acquire ApoE from HDL. The lipase-hydrolyzed, lipid and apolipoprotein-depleted chylomicrons containing ApoE are now called chylomicron remnants, that are released into the blood. These remnants, identified by their ApoE tags, are uptaken by the liver through the hepatic LDLR.

Cholesterol and triglycerides are brought back to the liver from peripheral tissues in HDL, the abundant lipoprotein in the circulation that contain the ApoA-I as its major protein component (Zannis et al., 2004; Hadjiphilippou and Ray, 2018). The protective property of HDL, commonly referred to as ‘good cholesterol’, is credited to its lipoprotein and lipid content. Excess cholesterol is disposed of most extrahepatic tissues as they lack the machinery to catabolize it. Cholesterol efflux from these sites is mediated by ATP-binding cassette (ABC) transporter proteins that are specific to certain cell types. ABC transporters are cell surface markers, of which ABCA1 (family A, member 1) and ABCG1 (family G, member 1) are located on macrophages. Hepatocytes and enterocytes harbor ABCG5 and ABCG8 (family G, member 5; family G, member 8) (Wang et al., 2015). The excreted cholesterol is acquired by the ApoA-1 to form nascent HDL. The maturation of HDL is marked by the esterification of free cholesterol by Lecithin: cholesterol acyl transferase (LCAT). Cholesterol esterification coupled with HDL enlargement qualifies mature HDL to recruit more cholesterol through ABCG1 transporter (Gelissen et al., 2006; Zimetti et al., 2015). In due course, the polar (free cholesterol and phospholipids) and non-polar lipids (cholesteryl esters, triglycerides) collected from peripheral various tissues, are distributed to steroidogenic tissues for steroid hormone and bile acid synthesis. Triglyceride-rich lipoproteins (TRGL) in the plasma function as energy banks by delivering free fatty acids to peripheral tissues (Walther and Farese, 2012). TRGLs include chylomicrons in the intestine, VLDL and IDL in the blood and their mode of operation of lipolysis is coordinated by LPL. HDL contributes to this energy supply through the reverse cholesterol transport (RCT). The exchange of cholesteryl esters for triglycerides between TRGLs and HDL is through the cholesteryl ester transfer protein (CETP). The HDLs return these lipid components to the liver where it is excreted as bile acids. In Figure 1, a schematic representation of lipoprotein mediated cholesterol trafficking is described.

FIGURE 1.

FIGURE 1

Cholesterol synthesis and lipoprotein transport (i) Endogenous cholesterol synthesized in the Endoplasmic Reticulum (ER) of liver is esterified to cholesteryl ester (CE) by Acyl-coenzyme A: cholesterol acyl transferase 1 (ACAT) (yellow arrow), packaged with phospholipids (PL), triglycerides (TG), and apolipoprotein B 100 (ApoB100) into Very Low-Density Lipoproteins (VLDL) for transport into the blood stream. (ii) During the course of lipoprotein transport in the plasma (red arrows), the free fatty acids (FFA) are hydrolyzed by Lipoprotein Lipase (LPL) and the apolipoprotein/CE depleted Low-Density Lipoproteins (LDL), recognized by their ApoB100, are uptaken by extra-hepatic tissues. (iii) Dietary fats absorbed by the enterocytes are packaged with ApoB48 and ApoC2 apolipoproteins along with TG to form chylomicron droplets that are released into the blood stream through the lymphatic system (Purple arrows). Extra-hepatic tissues recognize the apoproteins and take up the cholesterol by LPL-mediated hydrolysis of FFA. The cholesterol depleted chylomicron remnants carrying the ApoE apolipoprotein, acquired from HDL, are returned to the hepatocytes via the Low-Density Lipoprotein Receptor (LDLR) of hepatocytes (purple dotted arrows). (iv) Excess cholesterol from extra-hepatic tissues is released through ABC transporter proteins (ABCG5/ABCG8 -enterocytes and hepatocytes, ABCA1/ABCG1-macrophages) to High-Density Lipoprotein (HDL) that carry ApoE and ApoA1 apolipoproteins (cyan arrows). In macrophages, cholesterol effluxed through the ABCA1 transporter is packaged into nascent HDL. Nascent HDL triggers cholesterol esterification by LCAT and recruits more cholesterol through the ABCG8 transporter to form mature HDL. Mature HDL transfers cholesterol to steroidogenic tissues, through the scavenger receptor (SR-B1) located on the mitochondria, for the synthesis of steroid hormones and bile acids. The excess cholesterol is reverse transported from extrahepatic tissues and returned to the liver through the chylomicrons and lipoproteins (cyan dotted arrows). During the process, TG are exchanged for CE through the cholesteryl ester transfer proteins (CETP).

Lipid and Sterol Homeostasis

The constellation of events regulating cholesterol metabolism involve the alliance between various tissues and are not limited to the hepatocytes that contribute to the bulk of de novo cholesterol or the NPC1L1 (Niemann-Pick C1- Like1) expressing enterocytes of the intestine, where dietary cholesterol is absorbed. The ER houses most of the enzymes involved in cholesterol synthesis and regulates complex feedback loops, storage, trafficking and transport. Expectedly, an uneven distribution of cellular cholesterol is maintained, wherein 60–90% reside on the plasma membrane while ER exhibits less than 1% on its membranes (Luo et al., 2017). The distribution of sterols in the mitochondria resembles that of the ER, while the endocytic compartments, the trans-Golgi network and the Golgi apparatus falls between these extremes (Van Meer et al., 2008). The plethora of functions orchestrated by cholesterol in the body are attributed to its asymmetric compartmentalization that dictate the exchange of cholesterol between various tissues (Van Meer et al., 2008).

Transcription Factor Mediated Regulation of Sterol Metabolism

By virtue of the complex nature of mechanisms involved in maintaining cholesterol balance in the body, its synthesis, storage, trafficking, uptake, and export are processes that are both strictly monitored as well as energy demanding (Ikonen, 2008). Mammalian cells regulate cholesterol levels in the body either by controlling (i) de novo cholesterol synthesis or (ii) LDLR mediated uptake of exogenous cholesterol sequestered in LDL from the blood (Brown and Goldstein, 1997; Goedeke and Fernández-Hernando, 2012). As elaborately reviewed by (Luo et al., 2020; Soccio and Breslow, 2004), cholesterol synthesis is tightly controlled and the key regulators include SREBP and two rate-limiting enzymes, HMG-CoR and SM. Members of the SREBP (Sterol Receptor Binding Protein) family play pivotal roles in cholesterol metabolism, of which SREBP2 and SREBP1a are the key modulators. While SREBP2 regulates cholesterol biosynthesis, SREBP1a and SREBP1c modulate fatty acid synthesis (Amemiya-Kudo et al., 2002; Horton et al., 2002). The ER membrane-embedded protein INSIG (Insulin induced genes) regulates the transcriptional and post translational activation of SREBP and HMG-CoR, respectively (Rawson, 2003; Burg and Espenshade, 2011). INSIG is either directly bound to the sterol sensing domains (SSD) of HMG-CoR or indirectly, via SCAP, to the post translational precursors of SREBP that are retained in the ER membrane. This interaction is sterol-dependent, wherein cholesterol binds to SREBP-SCAP complex and oxysterol binds to INSIG. Lanosterol and oxysterol regulate the activation of HMG-CoR mediated mechanisms through the E3 ubiquitin ligase (Zelcer et al., 2014). In sterol depleted cells, the SREBP-SCAP complex is released from INSIG-1, and the latter is degraded by the proteasome, until cholesterol levels are restored. The release of INSIG changes the conformation of the SCAP-SREBP complex and SREBP is escorted from the ER, via the COPII coated vesicles, to the Golgi apparatus, where it is cleaved and activated. The cleaved nuclear SREBP fragment homodimerizes and binds to the Sterol Response Elements (SRE) in the promoter regions of cholesterogenic genes and other targets that increase cholesterol uptake and biosynthesis in the body. Cholesterol metabolism is also regulated post translationally by inhibiting HMG-CoR. When cholesterol or oxysterol are in surplus, its synthesis is down regulated by the sterol-mediated, protein–protein interaction between SREBP-SCAP complex and INSIG-1, respectively. As a result, the activation of downstream targets such as LDLR and HMG-CoR genes are turned off. When lanosterol and oxysterol are in abundance, the INSIGs remain bound to HMG-CoR. This complex down regulates HMG-CoR by triggering the E3 ligase and proteasomal degradation mediated by the ERAD (ER associated degradation) machinery. In addition, oxysterols regulate the levels of the oxysterol receptor- LXR (Liver X Receptor) (Peet et al., 1998; Zelcer and Tontonoz, 2006; Guillemot-Legris et al., 2016).

ER and Mitochondria Mediated Surveillance of Lipid Metabolism: The Involvement of UPR, ER Stress and Oxidative Stress

The dynamic roles played by ER ranges from Ca2+ signaling, protein folding, lipid and carbohydrate metabolism. As discussed in the section ‘Lipoproteins as mediators of cholesterol and lipid recycling and transport’ LDLR mediated internalization of LDL and cholesterol delivery to target tissues is - detrimental in maintaining stabilized lipid levels in the plasma as well as tissues. The synthesis of LDLR occurs in the ER and the internalization of LDL in the cells is proportional to the LDLR turnover. Being the major hub where nascent polypeptides are synthesized, the ER has its own quality control machinery (ERQC) comprised of ER chaperones, that ensure proper folding of the protein released from the ER, through the cis-trans Golgi network, to their site of action. Misfolded proteins are redirected into the chaperone complex until it is folded properly. Improperly folded proteins are eliminated by means of the ERAD pathway that directs it to the proteasomal degradation system. In line with the accumulation of misfolded proteins in the ER, the Unfolded Protein Response (UPR) halts further transcription and translation of the proteins. It is the signaling mechanism that promotes cell survival and is achieved by (i) halting further translation (ii) recruiting ERAD components to clear the unfolded protein (iii) upregulation of molecular chaperones that rectify the unfolded protein. Persistent activation of UPR propels ER stress in the cells that ultimately leads to apoptosis. The three major ER stress sensor proteins of UPR are (i) Inositol Requiring Enzyme 1 Alpha (IRE1A), Activating Transcription Factor 6 (ATF6) and (iii) Protein Kinase RNA-like ER kinase (PERK). In the normal state, the sensor proteins are maintained in the inactive state by binding to the ER chaperone, Glucose Response Protein-78 (GRP-78/BiP). Cellular stress, induced by internal and external cues, releases BiP from the ER sensors and activates these membrane-bound proteins to turn on the cascade of ER stress response. The release of BiP triggers the phosphorylation and dimerization of IREIA and PERK arms that impel specific transducers to execute subsequent functions. The active PERK facilitates the phosphorylation of eukaryotic translation Initiation Factor 2A (eIF2A) to inhibit general protein translation, but with the exception of selective mRNAs such as activating transcription factor 4 (ATF4). The attenuation of protein translation together with activation of ATF4 reduces the burden of post translational processing and trafficking of proteins, which in turn promotes the restoration of cellular homeostasis by upregulating genes involved in cell recovery However, prolonged stress induces ATF4- mediated expression of ER chaperones and C/EBP homologous protein (CHOP) (Hetz, 2012; Hu et al., 2019). Traditionally referred to as the translational arm, the PERK/eIF2A/CHOP arm regulate lipogenesis by controlling the processing and maturation of SREBP-1 and 2, C/EBPα, C/EBPβ and PPAR γ (Peroxisome proliferator activated receptor-gamma) (Lakshmanan et al., 2013). Increased levels of ATF4 and CHOP triggers the transcription of ATG genes (AuTophagy-related Genes), a pro-survival mechanism of the cell, to clear off misfolded proteins with the help of lysosomes (B’Chir et al., 2013; Zahid et al., 2020). However, chronic levels of ATF4 and CHOP due to persistent ER stress can induce cell death mechanisms by the activation of GADD34, ERO1 and Caspases (Rozpedek et al., 2016). CHOP-induced cell death is attributable to the suppression of the cell cycle regulator protein 21(p21/WAF1). Under normal conditions, p21 there exists a crosstalk between CHOP and p21 – an inhibitor protein that arrests the progression of cell cycle at G1 phase in a p53-dependent manner. This association is involved in the transition from adaptive UPR to proapoptotic pathway (Mihailidou et al., 2010).

The endoribonuclease activity of IRE1A mediates the splicing of a 26-nucleotide sequence of the X-box Binding Protein-1 (XBP1) mRNA, a basic leucine zipper transcription factor and translocation to the nucleus. Spliced XBP-1 (XBP-1s) mRNA promotes the activation of ERAD components, ER chaperones, lipogenic genes such as SREBP-1c and genes involved in phospholipid biosynthesis (Sriburi et al., 2007; Fu et al., 2011). Apart from splicing of XBP1, the RNase domain of IRE-1A is also involved in lipid anabolism by inducing Regulated IRE-1 dependent mRNA decay (RIDD). The spliced XBP1s protein upregulates a cascade of UPR-associated transcriptional events that promote protein folding and ERAD.

Unlike the PERK and IRE-1A arms of the UPR pathway, detachment of BiP leads to the translocation of ATF6 to the Golgi complex, where it is cleaved and activated by Site-1 Proteases (S1P) and Site-2 Proteases (S2P). The activated ATF6 fragment enters the nucleus and upregulates the transcription of ERAD components, along with the inhibition of SREBP2 mediated sterol synthesis (Horton et al., 2002; Volmer and Ron, 2015). To add on, the overexpression of nuclear ATF6 in proximal tubular cells of the kidney down regulates PPAR α (Peroxisome Proliferator Activated Receptor -Alpha), the key player involved in beta oxidation of fatty acids, causing lipotoxicity due to abnormal lipid droplet formation and accumulation (Jao et al., 2019). When cholesterol levels are elevated, a feedback loop is operational through the post-transcriptional regulation of its sterol-activated ERAD (DeBose-Boyd, 2018). The ER provides a platform for several signaling pathways and metabolically regulating events (Verkhratsky, 2005). Lipid metabolism plays a major role in maintaining the ER membrane function, disturbing the balance of which leads to ER stress and metabolic dysfunction.

Apart from the ERAD machinery, autophagy is an alternative cellular pathway for the degradation of misfolded or immature protein cargo that takes place in the major recycling cellular compartment – lysosomes. There are three major types of autophagy namely macro-, micro- and chaperone mediated autophagy (CMA) (Parzych and Klionsky, 2014). In macroautophagy, the cargo is engulfed by double-membraned vesicles called autophagosome (AP) which eventually fuses with the lysosome, under the influence of ATG genes (Ohsumi, 2014). Macroautophagy can be categorized into non-selective or selective, depending on the target assigned for degradation. While non-selective macroautophagy targets the general cytosol, or selective macroautophagy degrades specific organelles - mitochondria (mitophagy), ER (ER-phagy), and peroxisomes (peroxiphagy) (Lipatova and Segev, 2015). Prolonged ER stress triggers macroautophagy where it functions as a backup for ERAD (Houck et al., 2014). Compromised ERAD or proteasome functions trigger autophagy through UPR-dependent components providing substantial evidence for the tight physiological relationship between these machineries (Fujita et al., 2007). For instance, overexpression of EDEM1 – a component of the ERAD, is capable of bypassing the proteasomal degradation pathway by forming amyloid-like oligomers that recruit the macroautophagic machinery for degradation (Chiritoiu et al., 2020). In microautophagy, ingression of cargo into lysosomes is marked by the invagination of the lysosomal membrane. CMA is a highly specific phenomenon restricted to mammalian cells and involves the translocation of unfolded proteins through the lysosomal membrane (Kaushik and Cuervo, 2019). Microautophagy and CMA do not depend on ATGs and AP for the delivery of their cargo. When the severity of stress exceeds the degradation capacities of ERAD and autophagy, the cell switches to apoptotic cell death. The ubiquitin-proteasome/ERAD-I or the autophagy-lysosome/ERADII system are two major cellular clearance machineries that govern protein quality in eukaryotic cells. Poor protein quality control mechanisms derail the metabolic homeostasis substantiating the pivotal role of proteotoxicity in disease pathology. Stearing therapeutics toward autophagy, with the aid of pharmacological or natural agents, furnish novel schemes for the management of metabolic diseases (Zhang et al., 2018).

In addition to the ER, the mitochondria play a vital role in contributing to the lipid homeostatic network (Tamura et al., 2020). Cholesterol is converted to steroids, bile acids and oxysterols in the mitochondria of steroidogenic tissues (Russell, 2003; Martin et al., 2016). It is implicated that the mitochondria take up HDL cholesteryl esters through the scavenger receptor B1 (SR-B1) for adrenocorticoid steroidogenesis (Fu et al., 2011; Hoekstra, 2017). Located on the mitochondrial inner membrane are two major cholesterol metabolizing enzymes the P450 side chain cleavage system (P450scc/Cyp11A1) and sterol 27-hydroxylase (Cyp27) (Okuda, 1994; Miller and Strauss, 1999). While P450scc is specific to steroid hormone producing cells, Cyp27 is widely expressed in all cells. It mediates the conversion of cholesterol to 27-hydroxycholesterol, the most abundant oxysterol in the plasma. Likewise, it performs several other functions as that of a repressor of SREBP processing, an LXR agonist and as a more soluble and easily transported form of cholesterol in the plasma (Russell, 2000; Fu et al., 2001). The ER and mitochondria are key integrators of signals arising from different pathways and regulate cellular stress and inflammation. The crosstalk between these two organelles involves sensing Ca2+ flow. While ROS in the mitochondria is generated as a byproduct of oxidative phosphorylation, disulfide bond formation during protein folding generates ROS in the ER. In fact, these two organelles together contribute to the majority of ROS in cells (Malhotra and Kaufman, 2011). Excess ROS leads to oxidative stress in the mitochondria and induces ER stress due to disturbances in redox biology in the ER lumen (Cao and Kaufman, 2014). ER stress and oxidative stress interact further via PERK/ATF4 signaling via calcium and ROS until the transcription factor for antioxidative response, NRF-2 is activated. Eventually, ER and oxidative stress leads to the activation of inflammatory signaling pathway that aggravates the pathological outcome manifested in various metabolic diseases (Chaudhari et al., 2014). While the NF-kB pathway are upregulated by all three branches of UPR, the IRE1A arm is responsible for the JNK cascade.

ER-mitochondrial tethering is profoundly studied and does not involve membrane fusion between these organelles. The interaction is mediated by enzymes of lipid synthesis, signaling molecules, and membrane proteins. The proteins localized to this sub-compartment are referred to as mitochondria-associated ER membrane (MAM) (Area-Gomez et al., 2012). The dynamics of the proteins located in this structure determine the ER-mitochondria function. The classic proteins include Mitofusin 1/2 (MFN1/2), ER chaperones (BiP, Calnexin and Calreticulin), 75 kDa glucose-regulated protein (GRP75), Oxysterol-binding protein (OSBP)-related proteins (ORP5 and ORP8) Voltage-Dependent Anion-selective Channel protein 1/2 (VDAC1/2), and Inositol 1,4,5-tris Phosphate Receptor type 3 (IP3R3) (Naon et al., 2016; Veeresh et al., 2019). Post-translational modification and interaction with other proteins, including MAM components, influence the ER-mitochondria contacts. Copious amount of PERK is found in the MAM (Verfaillie et al., 2012). Mitochondria-ER contacts coordinate lipid composition, whereupon MAM play a crucial role in sensing nutrient levels and maintaining Ca2+ homeostasis and ROS. Abnormal retention of proteins in the MAM lead to the disruption of calcium homeostasis, metabolic disorders and cell death (Liao et al., 2020; Yang et al., 2020).

Despite the accumulative knowledge on genetic factors that contribute to lipid homeostasis, the influence of epigenetic factors have also been reported by various groups (Ferrari et al., 2012; Meaney, 2014). It is notable that apart from the reports on the classical transcription factor-mediated regulation of lipid metabolism, a distinct category of regulators comprised of microRNAs (miRNAs), long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) and RNA binding proteins (RBPs) has emerged but is vaguely explored (Kapranov et al., 2007; Rottiers and Näär, 2012; Chen, 2016).

Lipid Metabolism and Associated Diseases

A large volume of clinical, experimental and epidemiological data are available on lipid-associated disorders caused by external factors, lifestyle and inborn errors of metabolism. As per the lipid theory of diseases, LDL being the main transporter of serum cholesterol, is the primary determinant of abnormal accumulation of lipids in diseased conditions (Eikendal et al., 2016; Venugopal and Jialal, 2020). Likewise, biochemical modification of low-density lipoproteins are pathogenic hallmarks in various diseases (Alique et al., 2015). Lipid modifications alter the composition of LDL and can be categorized into (i) Oxidized LDL (oxLDL) (Schuh et al., 1978; Sawamura et al., 1997), (ii) glycated LDL (gLDL) (Vlassara, 2001), (iii) acetylated LDL (acLDL), (iv-v) ethylated and methylated LDL (Steinbrecher et al., 1984), and (vi) carbamylated LDL (cLDL) (Chen et al., 2020). These modifications alter the ApoB apolipoprotein and impair the LDL-LDLR interaction (Avogaro et al., 1991).

Oxidized LDL

Noteworthily, of all the lipid modifications discovered, oxLDL has been identified as the primary risk factor for cardiovascular diseases (CVD) and dyslipidemia (Itabe, 1998; Ke et al., 2018). Combination with other modifications such as gLDL, oxLDL contributes to the double modification phenomenon and expedites pathophysiological complications by the oxidation of existing glycosylated LDL (Rabini et al., 1994; Wu et al., 2008). Since the LDL itself is armed with an antioxidant component, alpha tocopherol or vitamin E, this along with the innate antioxidant defense mechanism rules out the occurrence of oxLDL in the circulation (Stocker and Keaney, 2004; Steinberg, 2009). However, lipid oxidation takes place either non-enzymatically, by transition metal ions (iron and copper) or through several enzymes (lipoxygenase and metalloproteinase) on the arterial walls. It occurs in two stages and produces mildly oxidized or highly oxidized LDL, depending on the degree of oxidation (Berliner et al., 1995; Steinberg, 2009). The first stage is marked by very little or no changes to LDL ApoB100 and the LDLR recognition and binding properties are not affected. Albeit, it brings about inflammatory changes by recruiting chemokines and cytokines, together with the activation of anti-apoptotic pathways and reducing the negative charge on the mildly oxidized LDL. The recruitment of inflammatory cytokines and chemokines causes further oxidation of LDL and protein modification of ApoB, as it transitions to the highly oxidized stage (Rhoads and Major, 2018). Apoprotein moieties of LDL are oxidized by oxidants at the basic, aromatic or sulfur-containing side chains (Ismael et al., 2015; Afonso and Spickett, 2019). Highly oxidized LDL are pro-apoptotic and fail to be recognized by LDLR (Steinberg, 2002). Instead, it attracts the scavenger receptors on macrophages that uptake oxLDL and form macrophage foam cells (Goldstein et al., 1979; Maiolino et al., 2013). Figure 2 describes the transition of LDL to highly oxidized LDL. Highly oxidized LDL are the pathogenic signature molecules found in macrophage foam cells and atherogenic lesions (Kluger, 1997; Steinberg, 2009; Di Pietro et al., 2016). Macrophages, smooth muscles and endothelial cells can generate oxLDLs. Interestingly, it was observed that the incubation of macrophages with oxLDL but not with native LDL leads to cholesterol ester accumulation (Parthasarathy et al., 2010; Hutchins et al., 2011). In addition, oxLDL-mediated apoptosis is characterized by a cascade of signaling events involving regulatory Bcl-2 gene family, caspases, sphingomyelinases and a wide range of nuclear transcription factors like NF-KB, TNFR1, and TNFR2. The core components of LDL -cholesteryl esters, triglycerides, phosphatidylcholine, undergo lipid peroxidation to form hydroperoxide and aldehyde derivatives (Girotti, 1998; Orsó et al., 2011). The content of unsaturated fatty acids such as linoleate and arachidonate determine the degree of peroxidation (Niki, 1997). The toxic oxysterols and lipid derivatives elicit reactive oxygen species (ROS) generation and alter cellular protein and lipids that trigger the formation of a necrotic lipid core.

FIGURE 2.

FIGURE 2

The transition of LDL to Oxidized Low-Density lipoproteins (ox-LDL)-Nascent LDL are recognized by LDL receptor-bearing cells through their ApoB100 apolipoprotein and do not get modified in the blood plasma due to the surveillance of the antioxidants. On the arterial walls, enzymatic or non-enzymatic modification oxidizes the lipoprotein components. Mildly oxidized LDL, though modified, can still bind to LDLR and recruits inflammatory cytokines and chemokines. LDLR fails to recognize the modified ApoB100, but it is recognized by the scavenger receptor, SR-B1 located on macrophages. Ox-LDL accumulated macrophages develop into foam cells. Pro-apoptotic and inflammatory signals are triggered with the recruitment of NFκβ and TNFRs.

Other LDL Modifications

gLDL modifications occur due to the non-enzymatic addition of glucose or its metabolites to the positively charged lysine residues located on the LDL-receptor binding domain of LDL ApoB. As a result, LDL loses its electropositivity and fails to be recognized by the LDLR, causing prolonged retention of gLDL in the plasma (Soran and Durrington, 2011). Elevated levels of Advanced Glycosylation End-products (AGE) on LDL are manifested in diabetic conditions than in normal individuals and is governed by glucose concentration as well as duration of exposure (Goh and Cooper, 2008). Furthermore, glycated LDL is prone to oxidation and thus gLDL or highly oxidized gLDL (HOGL) increases the susceptibility to atherogenesis (Siddiqui et al., 2019). The spontaneous carbamylation of amine residues on LDL ApoB by urea- or thiocyanate-derived cyanate generates cLDL (Kraus and Kraus, 2001). Urea, escalated in chronic renal failure and thiocyanate, released in the blood in tobacco smokers, cLDL that increases the atherogenic risks in these subjects (Ok et al., 2005; Wang et al., 2007).

Oxidized LDL and ER Stress in Human Diseases

Although the individual contributions of oxLDL and ER stress to the progression of a wide array of diseases have been elaborately studied and reviewed, reports on the collective involvement of these two factors in human diseases are limited. The following sections are aimed at identifying possible interactions between these two factors that may ultimately unveil common targets and biomarkers with therapeutic implications.

Atherosclerosis and Other Cardiovascular Diseases

Cardiovascular diseases account for the highest morbidity and mortality rates worldwide. The identification of atherosclerosis as a major CVD dates to >3500 years ago, with the same clinical impression as seen in modern times (Shattock, 1909). It is characterized by chronic inflammatory responses that lead to the proliferation of smooth muscle cells and the formation of lipid-accumulated plaques along the arterial walls that leads to the narrowing of arteries (Bruemmer and Law, 2003). Several lines of authentication point to the identification of oxLDL as the risk factor and the biomarker for atherosclerotic CVDs (Liang et al., 2012). However, a standard clinical reference value of oxLDL in healthy patients is not available and varies in different studies (Lara-Guzmán et al., 2018). It is well-documented that the uptake of ox-LDL, produced by ROS-induced oxidative stress, through the scavenger receptors of macrophages leads to the formation of atherogenic plaques (Frostegård, 2013; He and Zuo, 2015). The rupture of these atherosclerotic plaques induces the formation of thrombus that leads to heart attack and stroke (Orekhov and Ivanova, 2016). Studies on the association of ER with atherosclerotic plaques and its rupture have shown that UPR is activated in early stages of atherosclerosis, which switches to PERK and CHOP mediated cell death mechanism in the later stages of atherosclerotic smooth muscles and macrophages (Malhotra and Kaufman, 2007; Zhou and Tabas, 2013). Studies based on human coronary autopsy samples revealed significantly high levels of GRP78 and CHOP expression (Myoishi et al., 2007). Recent studies report a strong association of Grp78/BiP with carotid plaques and implicates the clinical application of circulating Grp78/BiP as a marker of metabolic and cardiovascular risk (Girona et al., 2019). The incubation of HMEC-1 cells with mildly oxidized LDL activated the PERK, IRE1A and ATF6 arms of UPR and ER stress response as evident by the continuous expression of CHOP. siRNA mediated inhibition of the IRE1A arm, together with JNK pathway inhibitor, SP600125 revealed the involvement of IRE1A/CHOP and JNK/SAPK pathway in triggering oxLDL induced apoptosis (Schroeter et al., 2001; Napoli, 2003). The ER stress markers colocalized with 4-hydroxynonenal (4-HNE), lipid peroxidation marker, in atherosclerotic lesions and were upregulated in oxysterol and peroxide derivatives of oxLDL; namely 4-HNE and 7-ketocholesterol (7-Ketochol), also known to induce CHOP/JNK pathway mediated apoptosis (Pedruzzi et al., 2004; Myoishi et al., 2007; Sanson et al., 2009). Oxysterols impart detrimental perturbations to the endothelial cells by altering the lipid composition and ER protein folding thereby activating UPR (Luchetti et al., 2017). The expression and anti-apoptotic function of the ER chaperone ORP150 is widely reported in drug induced hypoxia, diabetes, neuronal ischemia and atherosclerosis (Kusaczuk and Cechowska-Pasko, 2013; Lindholm et al., 2017; Nam and Jeon, 2019). The ER chaperone ORP150 colocalizes with IRE1A in these lesions and were found to limit CHOP mediated apoptosis in the vascular walls via the phosphatidyl inositol 3-kinase/Akt signaling pathway.

Muller et al. (2011) have identified that oxLDL treatment of human vascular endothelial and smooth muscle cells triggers the intrinsic mitochondrial apoptotic pathway due to sustained increase in Ca2+ ions (Sanson et al., 2009). As a follow-up study on human endothelial cells, the same group has identified that oxLDL induced ER stress triggers autophagy as a pro-survival mechanism, independent of the apoptotic pathway activated by oxLDL. Sustained ER stress activates the pro-apoptotic arms of ER stress response through CHOP and JNK pathways (Ron and Walter, 2007). Interestingly, the report unveils the anti-apoptotic protective role of HDL in oxLDL-induced ER stressed cells and proposes that its mode of action is mediated by inhibiting the rise in calcium levels, a trigger for oxLDL and ER stress induced apoptosis and autophagy (Muller et al., 2011). Incubation of human endothelial HMEC-1 and U937 macrophagic cell lines with oxLDL inhibited the protein folding ER chaperone - Protein Disulfide Isomerase (PDI) and its modification. The inhibitory effect of oxLDL was mimicked by exogenous 4-HNE and prevented by N-acetyl cysteine (Muller et al., 2013; Nègre-Salvayre et al., 2017). In vitro studies on oxLDL – treated HUVEC cells demonstrated the activation of ER stress via JNK/CHOP pathway and mitochondria-mediated apoptosis (Tao et al., 2016). Zhou and his group reported the protective function of Nuclear Factor I A (NFIA) on oxLDL - induced ER stress and apoptosis in HUVEC cells (Zhou et al., 2019). The pro-apoptotical signal PKCδ was identified as a crucial player in the progression of inflammatory ER stress response involving CHOP and JNK induction. PKCδ regulates oxLDL induced ER stress through the IREA/JNK pathway (Larroque-Cardoso et al., 2013). Studies on a rat model by Liu et al. revealed that persistent ER stress induced Ca2+ overload leads to the activation of the Calcium-Sensing Receptor (CaSR) and activates Protein kinase C δ (PKC δ) mediated apoptosis (Liu and Green, 2019; Ajoolabady et al., 2021). Ample evidence from various research groups corroborate microRNAs as key modulators of oxLDL-mediated signaling in atherosclerosis (Zhang and Wu, 2014; Xu et al., 2015). The miR-33 family of miRNA regulates genes involved in HDL metabolism and cholesterol efflux, particularly ABCA1, which is downregulated by ER stress. An atherosclerotic model system of macrophages exposed to oxLDL established the pathological link between elevated miR-33 expression and ER stress-induced lipid metabolic disorders. Knock down of CHOP alleviates ER stress and mitigates lipid metabolic disorders in atherosclerotic conditions, hence signifies CHOP as a potential therapaeutic target (Sun et al., 2018; Zahid et al., 2020) the UPR and ER stress response arms for therapy has burgeoned in the recent past, however, successful clinical trials are lacking as many of these targets do not directly target any upstream ER regulatory checkpoints (Subach et al., 2009; Ren et al., 2021).

Diseases of the Liver-NASH, NAFLD

The incidence of metabolic liver diseases like alcoholic or- non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and its progressive component non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) is on the rise with an alarming increase in demand for liver transplantations (Younossi et al., 2018). NAFLD is clinically diagnosed by the abnormal accumulation of fat in the liver, with age > 50 years, T2DM and obesity being its risk factors (Anstee et al., 2013). The progression of NAFLD to NASH is attributed to ER stress and mitochondrial dysfunction (Hotamisligil, 2010; Ozcan and Tabas, 2012; Henkel and Green, 2013; Maiers and Malhi, 2019). Together with the risk factors associated with NAFLD and NASH, it increases the susceptibility toward developing cirrhosis, hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), CVD or even chronic kidney diseases (CKD) (Galle et al., 2018; Sun et al., 2018). Taking into account the range of organs or tissues affected, NAFLD or hepatic steatosis can be called a multisystem disease (Byrne and Targher, 2015; Wong et al., 2016). oxLDL leads to liver injury and is used as a serum biomarker in patients with non-alcoholic steatohepatitis, hepatitis C infection, alcoholic and non-alcoholic liver diseases (Schroder et al., 2006; Nakhjavani et al., 2011; Ampuero et al., 2016). A growing body of information suggests that oxLDL contributes to hepatic inflammation and the progression of chronic liver diseases by the abnormal accumulation of oxLDL in the Kupfer cells, also called hepatic macrophages (Bieghs et al., 2013; Ho et al., 2019). Alcohol induced ER stress hepatic stress has been established along the PERK/FOXO3 and ATF6 arms as a mechanism for the pathogenesis of liver diseases in rodents and humans (Ji, 2014). While a vast majority of studies target the canonical ER stress response sensors that attenuate protein translation, or the downstream apoptotic pathway, Shin et al. (2013) identified the translational repressor function of SIRT7 as a potential therapeutic ER stress alleviator and hepatic homeostatic regulator. SIRT7, a histone H3 lysine 18 (H3K18) deacetylase belonging to the sirtuin family, is recruited by the XBP-1 arm of UPR to block gene expression and reduce ER stress. The XBP-1 recognizes specific nucleotide sequences on the promoter region of SIRT7 and the latter targets genes involved in protein translation and ribosome biogenesis. The SIRT7 interaction on the promoter region of these target genes is stabilized by Myc, a master regulator of ribosome biogenesis. They used a murine SIRT7 knock-out model to demonstrate that aggravated NAFLD-induced ER stress can be reverted by overexpression of SIRT7 in high-fat diet fed mice (Shin et al., 2013). It is interesting to note that a similar study using another strain of mice reported that SIRT7 deficient mice were resistant to steatosis at 12 weeks of age and did not develop fatty liver as they matured (Yoshizawa et al., 2014). The ambiguity arises, as justified by the authors, due to the difference in mice strains and the experimental protocol. Hence it cautions that the variation in experimental design alters the interpretation of results and is a caveat in identifying potential therapeutical targets.

Lectin-like oxidized low density lipoprotein-receptor (LOX-1) is a specific cell-surface receptor for oxLDL located on macrophages and liver (Zhang et al., 2015). Activation of IRE1/XBP-1 signaling pathway upregulates LOX-1expression and contributes to oxLDL-induced foam cell formation in macrophages (Ishiyama et al., 2011). An interesting study on the liver cell line L02 suggest that down regulation of LOX-1 by ER stress can be neutralized by rescuing the cells with low or medium doses of HDL, thereby improving lipid uptake in the liver cells. Competitive inhibition of oxLDL by upregulation of LOX-1 receptor in the liver helps to lower plasma oxLDL and thus reduces atherosclerotic risks (Hong et al., 2015). Although this study was conducted with the objective of reducing oxLDL-induced cardiovascular risks, the strategy can be adopted to combat liver diseases contributed by oxLDL and ER stress.

A major challenge that limits our understanding of the progression of metabolic diseases in human is that paramount data generated on oxLDL-induced ER stress associated disorders of the liver and therapeutic targets are based on animal models. Likewise, several research groups have successfully identified targets afflicted in liver diseases that can be salvaged by pharmacological interventions, the pathological link between oxLDL and ER stress is overlooked as they are confronted from different perspectives (Lebeaupin et al., 2018; Chadwick and Lajoie, 2019; Burchill et al., 2021).

Type II Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM), and Diabetic Retinopathy

The onset of Type II Diabetes mellitus is marked by defective secretion of insulin and apoptotic loss of the islet cells (Richardson et al., 2013). Genetic predisposition together with systemic insulin resistance, chronic levels of cholesteryl esters and modified LDL trigger beta cell damage and increase the risk of CVDs (Cleland, 2012; Ludwig et al., 2014). Apart from the presence of highly oxidized LDL and anti-oxLDL antibodies in T2DM, modified oxLDL receptors in human islet cells have also been confirmed by various groups (Alouffi et al., 2018; Santiago-Fernández et al., 2019; Xie et al., 2019; Puchałowicz and Ra′c, 2020). Pancreatic cells are more prone to ROS-induced oxidative stress as these cells have limited intrinsic antioxidant defense mechanisms. ER and oxidative stress induce insulin resistance and T2DM, characterized by multi-organ dysfunction including the liver, adipose tissue, pancreas and brain. In the adipocytes, fatty acid and glucose trigger IRE1A activation - leading to insulin resistance through the JNK signaling cascade, and PERK arm, which triggers the secretion of adipokines, Tissue Necrosis Factor Alpha (TNFA) and Interleukin-6 (IL-6). These ER stress signals released from adipocytes exasperate ER stress in beta islet cells of the pancreas. The progression of T2DM in the pancreatic islets follows the PERK/eIF2A/ATF4/CHOP mediated apoptosis, coupled with reduced glucose-stimulated insulin secretion (Ghemrawi et al., 2018). Co-culture experiments using insulin secreting cells (MIN6) with human pancreatic islets from biotherapies and cadaver tissues led to the finding that oxidative stress induced oxLDL imparts beta cell dysfunction (Favre et al., 2011). Mildly oxLDL activated the IRE1A-JNK-CHOP expression mediated apoptosis in beta cells, in line with previous reports (Xu et al., 2005). Though the PERK arm can also mediate CHOP activation via ATF4, the upregulation of P58IPK, the inhibitor of PERK, substantiated the involvement of the IRE1A arm. In addition, CHOP and P58IPK expression was attenuated in N-acetyl cysteine (NAC) and 4-phenyl butyric acid (4-PBA) treated cells, supporting the hypothesis of therapeutic effects of antioxidants to combat T2DM and beta cell dysfunction (Hamer and Chida, 2007; Plaisance et al., 2016). An interesting recent finding by Wu et al. have elucidated down regulation of ox-LDL induced ER stress response activation, via PERK- peIF2A-ATF4-CHOP-Caspase 3 mediated cell death, by Secretagogin (SCGN), a Ca2+ sensor protein. Biochemical and bioinformatic tools identified the protein–protein interaction between ATF4 and SCGN. MIN6 cells recovered from oxLDL induced ER stress when treated in combination with SCGN and PBA. Intriguingly, the activation of CHOP by the IRE1A arm was not evaluated (Wu et al., 2021). oxLDL imparts a negative impact on insulin sensitivity and beta cell function in adults and elevated levels of circulating oxLDL are associated with preeclamptic pregnancy and fetal growth restrictions (Uzun et al., 2005; Holvoet et al., 2008; Maisonneuve et al., 2015). The low levels of expression antioxidative enzymes and high oxidative energy requirements of pancreatic-beta cells are held responsible for the threat posed by oxLDL on the islet cells (Shah et al., 2007). A cohort study on cord blood specimens identify a negative relation between oxLDL and beta cell function in fetuses and newborns (Fang et al., 2021).

High concentration of oxidized LDL imparts insulin resistance and adds to the development of MetS (Linna et al., 2015). On the contrary, a cohort study on non-diabetic subjects without clinical symptoms for atherosclerosis, mediation analysis was used to identify oxLDL-mediated correlation between obesity and insulin resistance with MetS. It affirms that insulin resistance and obesity occur, in parallel, as cardiometabolic risk factors for dyslipidemic conditions (Hurtado-Roca et al., 2017). Diabetic Retinopathy accounts for the major cause of blindness in diabetic patients worldwide. The pathogenesis is associated with neuronal and vasculature abnormalities due to death of retinal ganglion cells (Barber et al., 1998). Lipid peroxidation products are a major source of oxidative stress that induce hyperglycemia along with dyslipidemic conditions that cause the modification and leakage of serum lipoproteins through the blood retinal barrier (BRB) propagates Diabetic Retinopathy. Analogous to atherosclerosis, extravasation and oxidation of LDL were identified by immunohistochemical techniques in retinal Müller cells of retinal cells of diabetic patients, even in clinically normal retinal capillaries (Wu et al., 2008). HOGLDL induces ER stress in cultured human retinal capillary pericytes (HRCP), by upregulating all three arms of UPR, as evident by the presence of p-eIF2A, truncated ATF6, increased XBP1s mRNA and the proapoptotic mediator, CHOP. Likewise, ER stress markers ATF6 and GRP78 were detected in the human diabetic retina (Fu et al., 2012). oxLDL-Immune Complexes (oxLDL-IC) are more potent inducers of ER stress than oxLDL in human retinal pericytes and triggers CHOP mediated apoptosis in diabetic retinopathy by means of the CD36 receptors (Fu et al., 2014).

Various knock-out rodent models have provided a deep insight on the onset and advancement of T2DM. The ensuing to gain- or-loss-of function of key factors that are spatiotemporally expressed vary in animal and human models due to differences in the differentiation processes. Over the past decade, a unique platform for disease modeling that couples genome editing with human iPSC-derived B cells is a promising approach because of its species-and disease-specificity.

Obesity

Similar to T2DM, obesity is the disease of the 21st century. According to the World Health Organization (WHO), the prevalence of obesity has tripled in the past 40 years and is no longer considered to be a disease of the affluent. The onset of obesity occurs due to inflammation and dysfunction of the adipose tissue. The adipose tissue is a reservoir of energy and secretes adipokines (Visfatin and resistin) and chemokines TNFA and IL-6 (Hug and Lodish, 2005; Wang et al., 2009, 2020; Harvey et al., 2011). Escalated ER stress in the adipose tissue of obese individuals modifies the adipokines and increases inflammation (Boden and Merali, 2011; Cao and Kaufman, 2014). Hypercholesterolemia leads to obesity by the accumulation of ox-LDL in the adipocytes that triggers ER stress mediated inflammation. The excessive secretion of adipokines induce insulin resistance, endothelial dysfunction to exuberate cardiovascular complications and T2DM (Guh et al., 2009). Molecular factors associated with fat cell defects include mitochondrial dysfunction, increased autophagy and the induction of oxidative and ER stress (Blüher, 2013). Studies in 3T3-L1 adipocyte cell lines have demonstrated that the oxLDL activated CHOP pathway was inhibited by tauroursodeoxycholic acid (TUDCA) (Chen et al., 2013). Proteosomal inhibition by MG-132 treatment of 3T3-L1 cells along with oxidative damage and ER stress contribute to insulin resistance in obesity (Díaz-Ruiz et al., 2015). oxLDL significantly increased the expression of the inflammatory chemokine Monocyte chemoattractant Protein-1 (MCP-1) in 3T3-L1 adipocytes. The Apo-A1 mimetic peptide L4F inhibited oxLDL mediated secretion in a dose dependent manner and attenuated MCP-1 expression through the C/EBPβ signaling pathway (Xie et al., 2016). Song et al. (2016) used an in vitro ox-LDL induced adipocyte model to demonstrate that HDL blocked ox-LDL-induced ER stress-CHOP pathway-mediated adipocyte inflammation by upregulating the expression of the scavenger receptor SR-B1 on adipocytes. They identified that the activation of CHOP was directed by the PERK and ATF6 arms of UPR (Song et al., 2016).

For the reason that intricate crosstalks exist between the underlying molecular mechanisms of T2DM, obesity and hepatic – related metabolic diseases, determining the linchpin of a specific pathway in this vicious cycle is a perplexing and cumbersome task.

Non-metabolic Disorders- Alzheimer’s Disease and Cancer

In addition to the metabolic diseases discussed in the previous sections substantiating the interplay between oxLDL and ER stress, these two factors are also involved in the progression of non-metabolic diseases. There are a variety of protein misfolding disorders (PMD) that affect the nervous system. Alzheimer’s disease (AD), Amyotropic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS) and Parkinson’s disease are categorized under this class of diseases with a characteristic long clinically silent phase (Soto, 2003; Selkoe, 2004). Beta amyloid proteins are the neurotoxic hallmark protein of AD. The formation of beta amyloid plaques in the temporal lobe lesions is closely related to oxidative stress that modifies the cholesterol content of these pathogenic signature proteins (Gamba et al., 2012; Wang et al., 2014). Serum oxLDL has been implied as a biomarker for Alzheimer’s disease (Sun et al., 2003; Bacchetti et al., 2015). AD patients had significantly higher levels of oxLDL in their plasma compared to the control group and positively correlated with the severity of AD (Wahrle et al., 2002; Dildar et al., 2010; Ishizuka et al., 2020). The toxic accumulation of the beta amyloid proteins elicit the ER stress response, ensuing synaptic dysfunction and neurodegeneration thereafter (Duran-Aniotz et al., 2014). The coalescence of upregulated chaperones, phosphorylated PERK-eIF2A-CHOP proteins chaperones and the build-up of ubiquitinated proteins are the salient features of ER stressed condition in AD (Van Leeuwen et al., 1998; Stutzbach et al., 2014; Duran-Aniotz et al., 2017). Activation of PERK arm of UPR together with abnormal phosphorylation of tau in neurons are reported in AD (Hoozemans et al., 2009; Nijholt et al., 2012). Inhibition of PERK by the oral administration of a PERK inhibitor, GSK2606414 in a transgenic mouse model of Fronto Temporal Dementia (FTD) prevented tau-mediated neurodegeneration (Radford et al., 2015). IRE1A deletion in a transgenic mouse model helped to restore learning and memory capacity and reduced amyloid deposition (Duran-Aniotz et al., 2017). Recently, preclinical models of pharmacological intervention or gene therapy approaches that target the UPR have promising therapeutic applications for slowing down AD (Ohno, 2014; Scheper and Hoozemans, 2015; Cissé et al., 2017). However, very few documentations point toward the interplay between oxLDL and ER stress mediated neurodegenerative diseases and carcinogenesis. Hence, therapy based on animal or human models in this line is still in its infancy. oxLDL links neurodegenerative disorders and cancer, particularly glioblastoma and prostate, liver and colon cancer (Chen et al., 2015). Serum levels of oxLDL are elevated in breast and ovarian carcinoma and thus can be used as a measurable risk factor (Barclay et al., 1970; Gadomska et al., 1997). Targeting CD36- a oxLDL receptor, has therapeutic implications in preventing metastasis (Pascual et al., 2017). Administration of oxLDL augments proliferation in ovarian cancer cell lines and reduces the IC50 of cisplatin (Scoles et al., 2010). Hence, identifying therapeutic targets that curtail the effects of oxLDL can help in reducing chemoresistance to drugs. Similarly, as suggested by Lin et al. (2019), shifting the targets for therapy from the current strategies aimed at chemotherapy- based cell killing, to the cryoprotective UPR elements is a promising approach for tumor treatment.

Conclusion and Future Perspectives

The mutual crosstalk between oxLDL and ER stress have been implicated in a range of emerging chronic diseases and widened the realms of our current understanding on the mechanism of dysfunction associated with these conditions. Figure 3 depicts a summary of the mechanisms and available therapeutic evidence. Apart from the curative potential of HDL, antioxidants or regulators of lipid metabolism; small molecules targeting the UPR or ER stress sensors and lncRNA/miRNA mediated modulation of oxLDL are also gaining interest. For instance, small molecule-based antagonist drugs such as 4-PBA or TUDCA against UPR component-mediated proteostatic impairment are gaining momentum. But the UPR also plays a substantial role in immune system regulation, cell differentiation and energy control (Todd et al., 2008; Dufey et al., 2014). For this reason, a key concern that arises with this approach are the underlying side-effects on the normal physiology (Gonzalez-Teuber et al., 2019). Targeting the altered phospholipids of oxLDL for active immunization with modified LDL derivatives or passive immunization with anti-oxLDL antibodies against atherosclerosis were successful in rabbit and murine models (Samson et al., 2012). In a similar line, anti-pneumococcal antibodies targeting pneumococci and mildly oxidized LDL greatly reduced atherosclerosis in mice, and the human trials are in progress, with no available data (Shekhar et al., 2018; Poznyak et al., 2021; Shiri-Sverdlov et al., 2021). Apoptosis signal-regulating kinase 1 (ASK-1) is upregulated by the IRE1A arm via TRAF2 phosphorylation and initiates the JNK pathway mediated apoptosis and fibrosis of the liver. The pharmacological administration of Selonsertib- an ASK-1 inhibitor, had promising effects in the second phase of trial in NASH patients. The results of the international phase three trials proved Selonsertib as a safe drug targeting ASK-1 but failed to reduce the progression of NASH (Loomba et al., 2018; Harrison et al., 2020). The detrimental convergence of oxidative stress with ER stress, wherein oxLDL serves as a linker that exacerbates the progression of the disease, is a double-edged sword and needs to be addressed in depth. In spite of the identification of serum oxLDL as the key risk factor in various diseases and its pharmacological intervention, an efficient translation of this therapeutic strategy from bench to bedside is yet to be achieved. Clinical challenges that limit the identification of serum oxLDL are the lack of pharmacokinetically and pharmacodynamically validated human antibodies against oxLDL as well as a high-throughput imaging system for the detection of oxLDL. Hence, advancements in these areas of research would provide a deeper understanding to adopt hybrid therapeutic strategies to combat the pathogenic players.

FIGURE 3.

FIGURE 3

A graphical summary showing the pathological crosstalk between oxLDL and ER stress involved in the progression of various human diseases and therapeutic strategies developed on the basis of in vitro/in vivo studies in human or animal models. Therapeutic intervention of the targets and their mode of action are highlighted in red and green. oxLDL, oxidized LDL; ER, Endoplasmic Reticulum; UPR, Unfolded Protein Response; UPR arms, PERK, ATF6, IRE1A-, ORP150-oxysterol receptor protein 150; HDL, High Density Lipoprotein; NAC, N-Acetyl cysteine; 4-PBA, 4-phenyl butyric acid; SIRT7, Sirtuin 7; PI3K, Phosphoinositide 3-Kinase; PDK1, Phosphoinositide-dependent kinase-1; AKT/PKB, Protein Kinase B, serine/threonine kinase; SR-B1, scavenger receptor B1.

It is noteworthy to mention that abnormal accumulation of diacylglycerols (DAG), ceramides and other modified lipoproteins- in tissues or in circulation, also contribute to dyslipidemia and bring about irreversible organ dysfunction. Again, oxLDL-induced autophagy augments the severity of lipid-associated diseases. However, this review attempts to streamline the vast knowledge currently available on oxLDL and ER stress mediated dysfunction and identify common elements for a better perception of maladies affiliated to these key factors.

Author Contributions

BA conceptualized the idea and critically reviewed the manuscript. DV wrote and edited the original draft and prepared the illustrations. Both authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Praseetha Kizhakkedath for the critical review and valuable suggestions. All illustrations in this article were created with BioRender.com.

Footnotes

Funding. This work was supported by UAEU Post Doc-Zayed Center Grant for a period of 2 years (Grant Nos. 31R243 and 12R084).

References

  1. Afonso C. B., Spickett C. M. (2019). Lipoproteins as targets and markers of lipoxidation. Redox Biol. 23:101066. 10.1016/j.redox.2018.101066 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Ajoolabady A., Wang S., Kroemer G., Klionsky D. J., Uversky V. N., Sowers J. R., et al. (2021). ER stress in cardiometabolic diseases: from molecular mechanisms to therapeutics. Endocr. Rev. Mar 8; bnab006 (Online ahead of print). bnab006. 10.1210/endrev/bnab006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Alique M., Luna C., Carracedo J., Ramírez R. (2015). LDL biochemical modifications: a link between atherosclerosis and aging. Food Nutr. Res. 59. 10.3402/fnr.v59.29240 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Alouffi S., Faisal M., Alatar A. A., Ahmad S. (2018). Oxidative modification of LDL by various physicochemical techniques: its probable role in diabetes coupled with CVDs. Biomed. Res. Int. 2018:7390612. 10.1155/2018/7390612 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Alphonse P. A. S., Jones P. J. H. (2016). Revisiting human cholesterol synthesis and absorption: the reciprocity paradigm and its key regulators. Lipids 51 519–536. 10.1007/s11745-015-4096-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Amemiya-Kudo M., Shimano H., Hasty A. H., Yahagi N., Yoshikawa T., Matsuzaka T., et al. (2002). Transcriptional activities of nuclear SREBP-1a, -1c, and -2 to different target promoters of lipogenic and cholesterogenic genes. J. Lipid Res. 43 1220–1235. 10.1194/jlr.m100417-jlr200 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Amihăesei I. C., Chelaru L. (2014). Metabolic syndrome a widespread threatening condition; risk factors, diagnostic criteria, therapeutic options, prevention and controversies: an overview. Rev. Med. Chir. Soc. Med. Nat. Iaşi 118 896–900. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Ampuero J., Ranchal I., Gallego-Durán R., Pareja M. J., del Campo J. A., Pastor-Ramírez H., et al. (2016). Oxidized low-density lipoprotein antibodies/high-density lipoprotein cholesterol ratio is linked to advanced non-alcoholic fatty liver disease lean patients. J. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 31 1611–1618. 10.1111/jgh.13335 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Anstee Q. M., Targher G., Day C. P. (2013). Progression of NAFLD to diabetes mellitus, cardiovascular disease or cirrhosis. Nat. Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 10 330–344. 10.1038/nrgastro.2013.41 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Area-Gomez E., Del Carmen Lara Castillo M., Tambini M. D., Guardia-Laguarta C. G., Ad J. C. M., Moneek I., et al. (2012). Upregulated function of mitochondria-associated ER membranes in Alzheimer disease. EMBO J. 31 4106–4123. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Avogaro P., Cazzolato G., Bittolo-Bon G. (1991). Some questions concerning a small, more electronegative LDL circulating in human plasma. Atherosclerosis 91 163–171. 10.1016/0021-9150(91)90198-C [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. B’Chir W., Maurin A. C., Carraro V., Averous J., Jousse C., Muranishi Y., et al. (2013). The eIF2α/ATF4 pathway is essential for stress-induced autophagy gene expression. Nucleic Acids Res. 41 7683–7699. 10.1093/nar/gkt563 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Bacchetti T., Vignini A., Giulietti A., Nanetti L., Provinciali L., Luzzi S., et al. (2015). Higher levels of oxidized low density lipoproteins in Alzheimer’s disease patients: roles for platelet activating factor acetyl hydrolase and paraoxonase-1. J. Alzheimers Dis. 46 179–186. 10.3233/JAD-143096 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Barber A. J., Lieth E., Khin S. A., Antonetti D. A., Buchanan A. G., Gardner T. W. (1998). Neural apoptosis in the retina during experimental and human diabetes: early onset and effect of insulin. J. Clin. Invest. 102 783–791. 10.1172/JCI2425 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Barclay M., Skipski V. P., Terebus-Kekish O., Greene E. M., Kaufman R. J., Stock C. C. (1970). Effects of cancer upon high-density and other lipoproteins. Cancer Res. 30 2420–2430. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Berliner J. A., Navab M., Fogelman A. M., Frank J. S., Demer L. L., Edwards P. A., et al. (1995). Atherosclerosis: basic mechanisms: oxidation, inflammation, and genetics. Circulation 91 2488–2496. 10.1161/01.CIR.91.9.2488 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Berneis K. K., Krauss R. M. (2002). Metabolic origins and clinical significance of LDL heterogeneity. J. Lipid Res. 43 1363–1379. 10.1194/jlr.R200004-JLR200 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Bieghs V., Walenbergh S. M. A., Hendrikx T., van Gorp P. J., Verheyen F., Olde Damink S. W., et al. (2013). Trapping of oxidized LDL in lysosomes of Kupffer cells is a trigger for hepatic inflammation. Liver Int. 33 1056–1061. 10.1111/liv.12170 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Blüher M. (2013). Adipose tissue dysfunction contributes to obesity related metabolic diseases. Best Pract. Res. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 27 163–177. 10.1016/j.beem.2013.02.005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Boden G., Merali S. (2011). Measurement of the increase in endoplasmic reticulum stress-related proteins and genes in adipose tissue of obese, insulin-resistant individuals. Methods Enzymology 489 67–82. 10.1016/B978-0-12-385116-1.00004-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Brown M. S., Goldstein J. L. (1986). A receptor-mediated pathway for cholesterol homeostasis. Science 232 34–47. 10.1126/science.3513311 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Brown M. S., Goldstein J. L. (1997). The SREBP pathway: regulation of cholesterol metabolism by proteolysis of a membrane-bound transcription factor. Cell 89 331–340. 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80213-5 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Bruemmer D., Law R. E. (2003). Thiazolidinedione regulation of smooth muscle cell proliferation. Am. J. Med. 87–92. 10.1016/j.amjmed.2003.09.014 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Burchill M. A., Finlon J. M., Goldberg A. R., Gillen A. E., Dahms P. A., McMahan R. H., et al. (2021). Oxidized low-density lipoprotein drives dysfunction of the liver lymphatic system. Cell. Mol. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 11 573–595. 10.1016/j.jcmgh.2020.09.007 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Burg J. S., Espenshade P. J. (2011). Regulation of HMG-CoA reductase in mammals and yeast. Prog. Lipid Res. 50 403–410. 10.1016/j.plipres.2011.07.002 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Byrne C. D., Targher G. (2015). NAFLD: a multisystem disease. J. Hepatol. 62 S47–S64. 10.1016/j.jhep.2014.12.012 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Cao S. S., Kaufman R. J. (2014). Endoplasmic reticulum stress and oxidative stress in cell fate decision and human disease. Antioxid. Redox Signal. 21 396–413. 10.1089/ars.2014.5851 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Cerqueira N. M. F. S. A., Oliveira E. F., Gesto D. S., Santos-Martins D., Moreira C., Moorthy H. N., et al. (2016). Cholesterol biosynthesis: a mechanistic overview. Biochemistry 55 5483–5506. 10.1021/acs.biochem.6b00342 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Chadwick S. R., Lajoie P. (2019). Endoplasmic reticulum stress coping mechanisms and lifespan regulation in health and diseases. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 7:84. 10.3389/fcell.2019.00084 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Chaudhari N., Talwar P., Parimisetty A., d’Hellencourt C. L., Ravanan P. (2014). A molecular web: endoplasmic reticulum stress, inflammation, and oxidative stress. Front. Cell. Neurosci. 8:213. 10.3389/fncel.2014.00213 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Chen K. C., Liao Y. C., Wang J. Y., Lin Y. C., Chen C. H., Juo S. H. H. (2015). Oxidized low-density lipoprotein is a common risk factor for cardiovascular diseases and gastroenterological cancers via epigenomical regulation of microRNA-210. Oncotarget 6 24105–24118. 10.18632/oncotarget.4152 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Chen Y., Chen M., Wu Z., Zhao S. (2013). Ox-LDL induces ER stress and promotes the adipokines secretion in 3T3-L1 adipocytes. PLoS One 8:e81379. 10.1371/journal.pone.0081379 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Chen Z. (2016). Progress and prospects of long noncoding RNAs in lipid homeostasis. Mol. Metab. 5 164–170. 10.1016/j.molmet.2015.12.003 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Chen Z., Ding S., Wang Y. P., Chen L., Mao J. Y., Yang Y., et al. (2020). Association of carbamylated high-density lipoprotein with coronary artery disease in type 2 diabetes mellitus: carbamylated high-density lipoprotein of patients promotes monocyte adhesion. J. Transl. Med. 18:460. 10.1186/s12967-020-02623-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Chiritoiu M., Chiritoiu G. N., Munteanu C. V. A., Pastrama F., Erwin Ivessa N., Petrescu S. M. (2020). EDEM1 drives misfolded protein degradation via ERAD and exploits ER-Phagy as back-up mechanism when ERAD is impaired. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 21 1–26. 10.3390/ijms21103468 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Cissé M., Duplan E., Lorivel T., Dunys J., Bauer C., Meckler X., et al. (2017). The transcription factor XBP1s restores hippocampal synaptic plasticity and memory by control of the Kalirin-7 pathway in Alzheimer model. Mol. Psychiatry 22 1562–1575. 10.1038/mp.2016.152 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Cleland S. J. (2012). Cardiovascular risk in double diabetes mellitus-when two worlds collide. Nat. Rev. Endocrinol. 8 476–485. 10.1038/nrendo.2012.47 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Dam H., Kristensen G., Nielsen G. K., Sondergard E. (1959). Influence of dietary cholesterol, cod liver oil and linseed oil on cholesterol and polyenoic fatty acid in times from fasted and non-fasted chicks. Acta Physiol. Scand. 45 31–42. 10.1111/j.1748-1716.1959.tb01676.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. David L. (2017). Lipid Pathway Basics: Absorption, Transport and Storage. Www.Thecalgaryguide.Com Published by The Calgary Guide under the license of Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported (CC BY-NC-SA 3.0) License, Canada. [Google Scholar]
  40. DeBose-Boyd R. A. (2018). Significance and regulation of lipid metabolism. Semin. Cell Dev. Biol. 81:97. 10.1016/j.semcdb.2017.12.003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Díaz-Ruiz A., Guzmán-Ruiz R., Moreno N. R., García-Rios A., Delgado-Casado N., Membrives A., et al. (2015). Proteasome dysfunction associated to oxidative stress and proteotoxicity in adipocytes compromises insulin sensitivity in human obesity. Antiox. Redox Signal. 23 597–612. 10.1089/ars.2014.5939 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Di Pietro N., Formoso G., Pandolfi A. (2016). Physiology and pathophysiology of oxLDL uptake by vascular wall cells in atherosclerosis. Vascul. Pharmacol. 84 1–7. 10.1016/j.vph.2016.05.013 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Dildar K., Sinem F., Gökhan E., Orhan Y., Filiz M. (2010). Serum nitrosative stress levels are increased in Alzheimer disease but not in vascular dementia. Alzheimer Dis. Assoc. Disord. 24 194–197. 10.1097/WAD.0b013e3181c53d0d [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Dufey E., Sepúlveda D., Rojas-Rivera D., Hetz C. (2014). Cellular mechanisms of endoplasmic reticulum stress signaling in health and disease. 1. An overview. Am. J. Physiol. Cell Physiol. 307 C582–C594. 10.1152/ajpcell.00258.2014 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Duran-Aniotz C., Cornejo V. H., Espinoza S., Ardiles ÁO., Medinas D. B., Salazar C., et al. (2017). IRE1 signaling exacerbates Alzheimer’s disease pathogenesis. Acta Neuropathol. 134 489–506. 10.1007/s00401-017-1694-x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Duran-Aniotz C., Martínez G., Hetz C. (2014). Memory loss in Alzheimer’s disease: are the alterations in the UPR network involved in the cognitive impairment? Front. Aging Neurosci. 6:8. 10.3389/fnagi.2014.00008 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Eikendal A. L. M., Groenewegen K. A., Bots M. L., Peters S. A. E., Uiterwaal C. S. P. M., den Ruijter H. M. (2016). Relation between adolescent cardiovascular risk factors and carotid intima-media echogenicity in healthy young adults: the atherosclerosis risk in young adults (ARYA) study. J. Am. Heart Assoc. 5:e002941. 10.1161/JAHA.115.002941 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Fang F., Nuyt A. M., Garofalo C., Zhang J., Julien P., Fraser W., et al. (2021). Oxidized LDL, insulin sensitivity and beta-cell function in newborns. BMJ Open Diabetes Res. Care 9:e001435. 10.1136/bmjdrc-2020-001435 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Favre D., Niederhauser G., Fahmi D., Plaisance V., Brajkovic S., Beeler N., et al. (2011). Role for inducible cAMP early repressor in promoting pancreatic beta cell dysfunction evoked by oxidative stress in human and rat islets. Diabetologia 54 2337–2346. 10.1007/s00125-011-2165-x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Feingold K., Anawalt B., Boyce A. (2000). Endotext: Glucagon Physiology. South Dartmouth, MA: MDText.com, Inc [Google Scholar]
  51. Ference B. A., Kastelein J. J. P., Catapano A. L. (2020). Lipids and lipoproteins in 2020. JAMA J. Am. Med. Assoc. 324 595–596. 10.1001/jama.2020.5685 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Ferrari A., Fiorino E., Giudici M., Gilardi F., Galmozzi A., Mitro N., et al. (2012). Linking epigenetics to lipid metabolism: focus on histone deacetylases. Mol. Membr. Biol. 29 257–266. 10.3109/09687688.2012.729094 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Frostegård J. (2013). Immunity, atherosclerosis and cardiovascular disease. BMC Med. 11:117. 10.1186/1741-7015-11-117 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Fu D., Wu M., Zhang J., Du M., Yang S., Hammad S. M., et al. (2012). Mechanisms of modified LDL-Induced pericyte loss and retinal injury in diabetic retinopathy. Diabetologia 55 3128–3140. 10.1007/s00125-012-2692-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Fu D., Yu J. Y., Wu M., Du M., Chen Y., Abdelsamie S. A., et al. (2014). Immune complex formation in human diabetic retina enhances toxicity of oxidized LDL towards retinal capillary pericytes. J. Lipid Res. 55 860–869. 10.1194/jlr.M045401 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Fu S., Yang L., Li P., Hofmann O., Dicker L., Hide W., et al. (2011). Aberrant lipid metabolism disrupts calcium homeostasis causing liver endoplasmic reticulum stress in obesity. Nature 473 528–531. 10.1038/nature09968 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Fu X., Menke J. G., Chen Y., Zhou G., MacNaul K. L., Wright S. D., et al. (2001). 27-hydroxycholesterol is an endogenous ligand for liver X receptor in cholesterol-loaded cells. J. Biol. Chem. 276 38378–38387. 10.1074/jbc.M105805200 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Fujita E., Kouroku Y., Isoai A., Kumagai H., Misutani A., Matsuda C., et al. (2007). Two endoplasmic reticulum-associated degradation (ERAD) systems for the novel variant of the mutant dysferlin: ubiquitin/proteasome ERAD(I) and autophagy/lysosome ERAD(II). Hum. Mol. Genet. 16 618–629. 10.1093/hmg/ddm002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Gadomska H., Janecki J., Marianowski L., Nowicka G. (1997). Lipids in serum of patients with malignant ovarian neoplasms. Int. J. Gynecol. Obstet. 57 287–293. 10.1016/S0020-7292(97)00071-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. Galle P. R., Forner A., Llovet J. M., Mazzaferro V., Piscaglia F., Raoul J. L., et al. (2018). EASL clinical practice guidelines: management of hepatocellular carcinoma. J. Hepatol. 69 182–236. 10.1016/j.jhep.2018.03.019 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  61. Gamba P., Testa G., Sottero B., Gargiulo S., Poli G., Leonarduzzi G. (2012). The link between altered cholesterol metabolism and Alzheimer’s disease. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 1259 54–64. 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2012.06513.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  62. Gelissen I. C., Harris M., Rye K. A., Quinn C., Brown A. J., Kockx M., et al. (2006). ABCA1 and ABCG1 synergize to mediate cholesterol export to ApoA-I. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 26 534–540. 10.1161/01.ATV.0000200082.58536.e1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  63. Ghemrawi R., Battaglia-Hsu S.-F., Arnold C. (2018). Endoplasmic reticulum stress in metabolic disorders. Cells 7:63. 10.3390/cells7060063 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  64. Gill S., Stevenson J., Kristiana I., Brown A. J. (2011). Cholesterol-dependent degradation of squalene monooxygenase, a control point in cholesterol synthesis beyond HMG-CoA reductase. Cell Metab. 13 260–273. 10.1016/j.cmet.2011.01.015 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  65. Girona J., Rodríguez-Borjabad C., Ibarretxe D., Vallvé J.-C., Ferré R., Heras M., et al. (2019). The circulating GRP78/BiP is a marker of metabolic diseases and atherosclerosis: bringing endoplasmic reticulum stress into the clinical scenario. J. Clin. Med. 8:1793. 10.3390/jcm8111793 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  66. Girotti A. W. (1998). Lipid hydroperoxide generation, turnover, and effector action in biological systems. J. Lipid Res. 39 1529–1542. 10.1016/s0022-2275(20)32182-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  67. Gliozzi M., Musolino V., Bosco F., Scicchitano M., Scarano F., Nucera S., et al. (2021). Cholesterol homeostasis: researching a dialogue between the brain and peripheral tissues. Pharmacol. Res. 163:105215. 10.1016/j.phrs.2020.105215 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  68. Goedeke L., Fernández-Hernando C. (2012). Regulation of cholesterol homeostasis. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 69 915–930. 10.1007/s00018-011-0857-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  69. Goh S. Y., Cooper M. E. (2008). The role of advanced glycation end products in progression and complications of diabetes. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 93 1143–1152. 10.1210/jc.2007-1817 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  70. Goldstein J. L., Brown M. S. (2009). The LDL receptor. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 29 431–438. 10.1161/ATVBAHA.108.179564 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  71. Goldstein J. L., Ho Y. K., Basu S. K., Brown M. S. (1979). Binding site on macrophages that mediates uptake and degradation of acetylated low density lipoprotein, producing massive cholesterol deposition. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 76 333–337. 10.1073/pnas.76.1.333 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  72. Gonzalez-Teuber V., Albert-Gasco H., Auyeung V. C., Papa F. R., Mallucci G. R., Hetz C. (2019). Small molecules to improve ER proteostasis in disease. Trends Pharmacol. Sci. 40 684–695. 10.1016/j.tips.2019.07.003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  73. Grouleff J., Irudayam S. J., Skeby K. K., Schiøtt B. (2015). The influence of cholesterol on membrane protein structure, function, and dynamics studied by molecular dynamics simulations. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Biomembr. 1848 1783–1795. 10.1016/j.bbamem.2015.03.029 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  74. Guh D. P., Zhang W., Bansback N., Amarsi Z., Birmingham C. L., Anis A. H. (2009). The incidence of co-morbidities related to obesity and overweight: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Public Health 9:88. 10.1186/1471-2458-9-88 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  75. Guillemot-Legris O., Mutemberezi V., Muccioli G. G. (2016). Oxysterols in metabolic syndrome: from bystander molecules to bioactive lipids. Trends Mol. Med. 22 594–614. 10.1016/j.molmed.2016.05.006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  76. Hadjiphilippou S., Ray K. K. (2018). Lipids and lipoproteins in risk prediction. Cardiol. Clin. 36 213–220. 10.1016/j.ccl.2017.12.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  77. Hamer M., Chida Y. (2007). Intake of fruit, vegetables, and antioxidants and risk of type 2 diabetes: systematic review and meta-analysis. J. Hypertens. 25 2361–2369. 10.1097/HJH.0b013e3282efc214 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  78. Harrison S. A., Wong V. W. S., Okanoue T., Bzowej N., Vuppalanchi R., Younes Z., et al. (2020). Selonsertib for patients with bridging fibrosis or compensated cirrhosis due to NASH: results from randomized phase III STELLAR trials. J. Hepatol. 73 26–39. 10.1016/j.jhep.2020.02.027 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  79. Harvey A. E., Lashinger L. M., Hursting S. D. (2011). The growing challenge of obesity and cancer: an inflammatory issue. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 1229 45–52. 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2011.06096.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  80. He F., Zuo L. (2015). Redox roles of reactive oxygen species in cardiovascular diseases. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 16 27770–27780. 10.3390/ijms161126059 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  81. Henkel A., Green R. M. (2013). The unfolded protein response in fatty liver disease. Semin. Liver Dis. 33 321–329. 10.1055/s-0033-1358522 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  82. Hetz C. (2012). The unfolded protein response: controlling cell fate decisions under ER stress and beyond. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 13 89–102. 10.1038/nrm3270 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  83. Ho C. M., Ho S. L., Jeng Y. M., Lai Y. S., Chen Y. H., Lu S. C., et al. (2019). Accumulation of free cholesterol and oxidized low-density lipoprotein is associated with portal inflammation and fibrosis in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. J. Inflamm. (United Kingdom) 16:7. 10.1186/s12950-019-0211-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  84. Hoekstra M. (2017). SR-BI as target in atherosclerosis and cardiovascular disease - A comprehensive appraisal of the cellular functions of SR-BI in physiology and disease. Atherosclerosis 258 153–161. 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2017.01.034 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  85. Holvoet P., Lee D. H., Steffes M., Gross M., Jacobs D. R. (2008). Association between circulating oxidized low-density lipoprotein and incidence of the metabolic syndrome. Obstet. Gynecol. Surv. 63 575–576. 10.1097/01.ogx.0000325909.37110.74 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  86. Hong D., Li L. F., Gao H. C., Wang X., Li C. C., Luo Y., et al. (2015). High-density lipoprotein prevents endoplasmic reticulum stress-induced downregulation of liver LOX-1 expression. PLoS One 10:e0124285. 10.1371/journal.pone.0124285 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  87. Hoozemans J. J. M., Van Haastert E. S., Nijholt D. A. T., Rozemuller A. J. M., Eikelenboom P., Scheper W. (2009). The unfolded protein response is activated in pretangle neurons in alzheimer’s disease hippocampus. Am. J. Pathol. 174 1241–1251. 10.2353/ajpath.2009.080814 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  88. Horton J. D., Goldstein J. L., Brown M. S. (2002). SREBPs: activators of the complete program of cholesterol and fatty acid synthesis in the liver. J. Clin. Invest. 109 1125–1131. 10.1172/JCI0215593 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  89. Hotamisligil G. S. (2010). Endoplasmic reticulum stress and the inflammatory basis of metabolic disease. Cell 140 900–917. 10.1016/j.cell.2010.02.034 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  90. Houck S. A., Ren H. Y., Madden V. J., Bonner J. N., Conlin M. P., Janovick J. A., et al. (2014). Quality control autophagy degrades soluble ERAD-resistant conformers of the misfolded membrane protein GnRHR. Mol. Cell 54 166–179. 10.1016/j.molcel.2014.02.025 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  91. Howe V., Sharpe L. J., Prabhu A. V., Brown A. J. (2017). New insights into cellular cholesterol acquisition: promoter analysis of human HMGCR and SQLE, two key control enzymes in cholesterol synthesis. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Mol. Cell Biol. Lipids 1862 647–657. 10.1016/j.bbalip.2017.03.009 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  92. Hu H., Tian M., Ding C., Yu S. (2019). The C/EBP homologous protein (CHOP) transcription factor functions in endoplasmic reticulum stress-induced apoptosis and microbial infection. Front. Immunol. 10:3083. 10.3389/fimmu.2018.03083 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  93. Hug C., Lodish H. F. (2005). Visfatin: a new adipokine. Science 307 366–367. 10.1126/science.1106933 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  94. Hurtado-Roca Y., Bueno H., Fernandez-Ortiz A., Ordovas J. M., Ibañez B., Fuster V., et al. (2017). Oxidized LDL is associated with metabolic syndrome traits independently of central obesity and insulin resistance. Diabetes 66 474–482. 10.2337/db16-0933 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  95. Hutchins P. M., Moore E. E., Murphy R. C. (2011). Electrospray MS/MS reveals extensive and nonspecific oxidation of cholesterol esters in human peripheral vascular lesions. J. Lipid Res. 52 2070–2083. 10.1194/jlr.M019174 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  96. Ikonen E. (2008). Cellular cholesterol trafficking and compartmentalization. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 9 125–138. 10.1038/nrm2336 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  97. Ishiyama J., Taguchi R., Akasaka Y., Shibata S., Ito M., Nagasawa M., et al. (2011). Unsaturated FAs prevent palmitate-induced LOX-1 induction via inhibition of ER stress in macrophages. J. Lipid Res. 52 299–307. 10.1194/jlr.M007104 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  98. Ishizuka T., Nagata W., Nomura-Takahashi S., Satoh Y. (2020). Effects of oxidized low-density lipoprotein on differentiation of mouse neural progenitor cells into neural cells. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 888:173456. 10.1016/j.ejphar.2020.173456 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  99. Ismael F. O., Proudfoot J. M., Brown B. E., Van Reyk D. M., Croft K. D., Davies M. J., et al. (2015). Comparative reactivity of the myeloperoxidase-derived oxidants HOCl and HOSCN with low-density lipoprotein (LDL): implications for foam cell formation in atherosclerosis. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 573 40–51. 10.1016/j.abb.2015.03.008 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  100. Itabe H. (1998). Oxidized phospholipids as a new landmark in atherosclerosis. Prog. Lipid Res. 37 181–207. 10.1016/S0163-7827(98)00009-5 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  101. Jao T. M., Nangaku M., Wu C. H., Sugahara M., Saito H., Maekawa H., et al. (2019). ATF6α downregulation of PPARα promotes lipotoxicity-induced tubulointerstitial fibrosis. Kidney Int. 95 577–589. 10.1016/j.kint.2018.09.023 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  102. Ji C. (2014). New insights into the pathogenesis of alcohol-induced er stress and liver diseases. Int. J. Hepatol. 2014:513787. 10.1155/2014/513787 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  103. Jiang S. Y., Li H., Tang J. J., Wang J., Luo J., Liu B., et al. (2018). Discovery of a potent HMG-CoA reductase degrader that eliminates statin-induced reductase accumulation and lowers cholesterol. Nat. Commun. 9:5138. 10.1038/s41467-018-07590-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  104. Kapranov P., Cheng J., Dike S., Nix D. A., Duttagupta R., Willingham A. T., et al. (2007). RNA maps reveal new RNA classes and a possible function for pervasive transcription. Science 316 1484–1488. 10.1126/science.1138341 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  105. Kaushik S., Cuervo A. M. (2019). The coming of age of chaperone-mediated autophagy. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 19 365-381. 10.1038/s41580-018-0001-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  106. Ke C., Zhu X., Zhang Y., Shen Y. (2018). Metabolomic characterization of hypertension and dyslipidemia. Metabolomics 14:117. 10.1007/s11306-018-1408-y [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  107. Kluger J. (1997). Beyond cholesterol. Time 150:48. 10.1056/nejm198904063201407 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  108. Kraus L. M., Kraus J. (2001). Carbamoylation of amino acids and proteins in uremia. Kidney Int. Suppl. 78 S102–S107. 10.1046/j.1523-1755.2001.59780102.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  109. Kusaczuk M., Cechowska-Pasko M. (2013). Molecular chaperone ORP150 in ER stress–related diseases. Curr. Pharm. Des. 19 2807–2818. 10.2174/1381612811319150016 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  110. Lakshmanan A. P., Harima M., Suzuki K., Soetikno V., Nagata M., Nakamura T., et al. (2013). The hyperglycemia stimulated myocardial endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress contributes to diabetic cardiomyopathy in the transgenic non-obese type 2 diabetic rats: a differential role of unfolded protein response (UPR) signaling proteins. Int. J. Biochem. Cell Biol. 45 438–447. 10.1016/j.biocel.2012.09.017 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  111. Lange Y., Ye J., Steck T. L. (2014). Essentially all excess fibroblast cholesterol moves from plasma membranes to intracellular compartments. PLoS One 9:e98482. 10.1371/journal.pone.0098482 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  112. Lara-Guzmán O. J., Gil-Izquierdo Á, Medina S., Osorio E., Álvarez-Quintero R., Zuluaga N., et al. (2018). Oxidized LDL triggers changes in oxidative stress and inflammatory biomarkers in human macrophages. Redox Biol. 15 1–11. 10.1016/j.redox.2017.11.017 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  113. Larroque-Cardoso P., Swiader A., Ingueneau C., Nègre-Salvayre A., Elbaz M., Reyland M. E., et al. (2013). Role of protein kinase C δ in ER stress and apoptosis induced by oxidized LDL in human vascular smooth muscle cells. Cell Death Dis. 4:e520. 10.1038/cddis.2013.47 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  114. Lebeaupin C., Vallée D., Hazari Y., Hetz C., Chevet E., Bailly-Maitre B. (2018). Endoplasmic reticulum stress signalling and the pathogenesis of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. J. Hepatol. 69 927–947. 10.1016/j.jhep.2018.06.008 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  115. Liang C. P., Han S., Li G., Tabas I., Tall A. R. (2012). Impaired MEK signaling and SERCA expression promote ER stress and apoptosis in insulin-resistant macrophages and are reversed by exenatide treatment. Diabetes 61 2609–2620. 10.2337/db11-1415 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  116. Liao Y., Dong Y., Cheng J. (2020). The molecular determinants of mitochondrial membrane contact With ER, lysosomes and peroxisomes in neuronal physiology and pathology. Front. Cell. Neurosci. 14:194. 10.3389/fncel.2020.00194 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  117. Lin Y., Jiang M., Chen W., Zhao T., Wei Y. (2019). Cancer and ER stress: mutual crosstalk between autophagy, oxidative stress and inflammatory response. Biomed. Pharmacother. 118:109249 10.1016/j.biopha.2019.109249 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  118. Lindholm D., Korhonen L., Eriksson O., Kõks S. (2017). Recent insights into the role of unfolded protein response in ER stress in health and disease. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 5:48. 10.3389/fcell.2017.00048 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  119. Linna M. S., Ahotupa M., Kukkonen-Harjula K., Fogelholm M., Vasankari T. J. (2015). Co-existence of insulin resistance and high concentrations of circulating oxidized LDL lipids. Ann. Med. 47 394–398. 10.3109/07853890.2015.1043939 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  120. Lipatova Z., Segev N. (2015). A role for macro-ER-phagy in ER quality control. PLoS Genet. 11:e1005390. 10.1371/journal.pgen.1005390 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  121. Litvinov D. Y., Savushkin E. V., Dergunov A. D. (2018). Intracellular and plasma membrane events in cholesterol transport and homeostasis. J. Lipids 2018:3965054. 10.1155/2018/3965054 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  122. Liu X., Green R. M. (2019). Endoplasmic reticulum stress and liver diseases. Liver Res. 3 55–64. 10.1016/j.livres.2019.01.002 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  123. Loomba R., Lawitz E., Mantry P. S., Jayakumar S., Caldwell S. H., Arnold H., et al. (2018). The ASK1 inhibitor selonsertib in patients with nonalcoholic steatohepatitis: a randomized, phase 2 trial. Hepatology 67 549–559. 10.1002/hep.29514 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  124. Luchetti F., Crinelli R., Cesarini E., Canonico B., Guidi L., Zerbinati C., et al. (2017). Endothelial cells, endoplasmic reticulum stress and oxysterols. Redox Biol. 13 581–587. 10.1016/j.redox.2017.07.014 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  125. Ludwig B., Barthel A., Reichel A., Block N. L., Ludwig S., Schally A. V., et al. (2014). Modulation of the pancreatic islet-stress axis as a novel potential therapeutic target in diabetes mellitus. Vitam. Horm. 95 195–222. 10.1016/B978-0-12-800174-5.00008-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  126. Luo J., Jiang L., Yang H., Song B. L. (2017). Routes and mechanisms of post-endosomal cholesterol trafficking: a story that never ends. Traffic 18 209–217. 10.1111/tra.12471 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  127. Luo J., Yang H., Song B. L. (2020). Mechanisms and regulation of cholesterol homeostasis. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 21 225–245. 10.1038/s41580-019-0190-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  128. Maiers J. L., Malhi H. (2019). Endoplasmic reticulum stress in metabolic liver diseases and hepatic fibrosis. Semin. Liver Dis. 39 235–248. 10.1055/s-0039-1681032 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  129. Maiolino G., Rossitto G., Caielli P., Bisogni V., Rossi G. P., Calò L. A. (2013). The role of oxidized low-density lipoproteins in atherosclerosis: the myths and the facts. Mediators Inflamm. 2013:714653. 10.1155/2013/714653 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  130. Maisonneuve E., Delvin E., Ouellet A., Morin L., Dubé J., Boucoiran I., et al. (2015). Oxidative conditions prevail in severe IUGR with vascular disease and Doppler anomalies. J. Matern. Neonatal Med. 28 1471–1475. 10.3109/14767058.2014.957670 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  131. Malhotra J. D., Kaufman R. J. (2007). Endoplasmic reticulum stress and oxidative stress: a vicious cycle or a double-edged sword? Antioxid. Redox Signal. 9 2277–2293. 10.1089/ars.2007.1782 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  132. Malhotra J. D., Kaufman R. J. (2011). ER stress and Its functional link to mitochondria: role in cell survival and death. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 3:a004424. 10.1101/cshperspect.a004424 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  133. Martin L. A., Kennedy B. E., Karten B. (2016). Mitochondrial cholesterol: mechanisms of import and effects on mitochondrial function. J. Bioenerg. Biomembr. 48 137–151. 10.1007/s10863-014-9592-6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  134. Meaney S. (2014). Epigenetic regulation of cholesterol homeostasis. Front. Genet. 5:311. 10.3389/fgene.2014.00311 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  135. Mihailidou C., Papazian I., Papavassiliou A. G., Kiaris H. (2010). CHOP-dependent regulation of p21/waf1 during ER stress. Cell. Physiol. Biochem. 25 761–766. 10.1159/000315096 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  136. Miller W. L., Strauss J. F. (1999). Molecular pathology and mechanism of action of the steroidogenic acute regulatory protein, STAR. J. Steroid Biochem. Mol. Biol. 131–141. 10.1016/S0960-0760(98)00153-8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  137. Morzycki J. W. (2014). Recent advances in cholesterol chemistry. Steroids 83 62–79. 10.1016/j.steroids.2014.02.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  138. Muller C., Bandemer J., Vindis C., Camaré C., Mucher E., Guéraud F., et al. (2013). Protein disulfide isomerase modification and inhibition contribute to ER stress and apoptosis induced by oxidized low density lipoproteins. Antioxid. Redox Signal. 18 731–742. 10.1089/ars.2012.4577 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  139. Muller C., Salvayre R., Nègre-Salvayre A., Vindis C. (2011). HDLs inhibit endoplasmic reticulum stress and autophagic response induced by oxidized LDLs. Cell Death Differ. 18 817–828. 10.1038/cdd.2010.149 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  140. Myoishi M., Hao H., Minamino T., Watanabe K., Nishihira K., Hatakeyama K., et al. (2007). Increased endoplasmic reticulum stress in atherosclerotic plaques associated with acute coronary syndrome. Circulation 116 1226–1233. 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.682054 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  141. Nakhjavani M., Mashayekh A., Khalilzadeh O., Asgarani F., Morteza A., Omidi M., et al. (2011). Oxidized low-density lipoprotein is associated with viral load and disease activity in patients with chronic hepatitis C. Clin. Res. Hepatol. Gastroenterol. 35 111–116. 10.1016/j.clinre.2010.11.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  142. Nam S. M., Jeon Y. J. (2019). Proteostasis in the endoplasmic reticulum: road to cure. Cancers (Basel). 11:1793. 10.3390/cancers11111793 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  143. Naon D., Zaninello M., Giacomello M., Varanita T., Grespi F., Lakshminaranayan S., et al. (2016). Critical reappraisal confirms that Mitofusin 2 is an endoplasmic reticulum-mitochondria tether. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 113 11249–11254. 10.1073/pnas.1606786113 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  144. Napoli C. (2003). Oxidation of LDL, Atherogenesis, and Apoptosis. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 698–709. 10.1196/annals.1299.127 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  145. Nègre-Salvayre A., Augé N., Camaré C., Bacchetti T., Ferretti G., Salvayre R. (2017). Dual signaling evoked by oxidized LDLs in vascular cells. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 106 118–133. 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2017.02.006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  146. Nijholt D. A. T., Van Haastert E. S., Rozemuller A. J. M., Scheper W., Hoozemans J. J. M. (2012). The unfolded protein response is associated with early tau pathology in the hippocampus of tauopathies. J. Pathol. 226 693–702. 10.1002/path.3969 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  147. Niki E. (1997). Dynamics of oxidation of LDL and its inhibition by antioxidants. BioFactors 6 201–208. 10.1002/biof.5520060214 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  148. Ohno M. (2014). Roles of eIF2α kinases in the pathogenesis of Alzheimer’s disease. Front. Mol. Neurosci. 7:22. 10.3389/fnmol.2014.00022 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  149. Ohsumi Y. (2014). Historical landmarks of autophagy research. Cell Res. 24 9–23. 10.1038/cr.2013.169 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  150. Ok E., Basnakian A. G., Apostolov E. O., Barri Y. M., Shah S. V. (2005). Carbamylated low-density lipoprotein induces death of endothelial cells: a link to atherosclerosis in patients with kidney disease. Kidney Int. 68 173–178. 10.1111/j.1523-1755.2005.00391.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  151. Okuda K. I. (1994). Liver mitochondrial P450 involved in cholesterol catabolism and vitamin D activation. J. Lipid Res. 35 361–372. 10.1016/s0022-2275(20)41189-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  152. Orekhov A. N., Ivanova E. A. (2016). Cellular models of atherosclerosis and their implication for testing natural substances with anti-atherosclerotic potential. Phytomedicine 23 1190–1197. 10.1016/j.phymed.2016.01.003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  153. Orsó E., Grandl M., Schmitz G. (2011). Oxidized LDL-induced endolysosomal phospholipidosis and enzymatically modified LDL-induced foam cell formation determine specific lipid species modulation in human macrophages. Chem. Phys. Lipids 164 479–487. 10.1016/j.chemphyslip.2011.06.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  154. Ozcan L., Tabas I. (2012). Role of endoplasmic reticulum stress in metabolic disease and other disorders. Annu. Rev. Med. 63 317–328. 10.1146/annurev-med-043010-144749 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  155. Pallottini V., Montanari L., Cavallini G., Bergamini E., Gori Z., Trentalance A. (2004). Mechanisms underlying the impaired regulation of 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase in aged rat liver. Mech. Ageing Dev. 125 633–639. 10.1016/j.mad.2004.08.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  156. Parthasarathy S., Raghavamenon A., Garelnabi M. O., Santanam N. (2010). Oxidized low-density lipoprotein. Methods Mol. Biol. 610 403–417. 10.1007/978-1-60327-029-8_24 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  157. Parzych K. R., Klionsky D. J. (2014). An overview of autophagy: morphology, mechanism, and regulation. Antioxid. Redox Signal. 20 460–473. 10.1089/ars.2013.5371 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  158. Pascual G., Avgustinova A., Mejetta S., Martín M., Castellanos A., Attolini C. S. O., et al. (2017). Targeting metastasis-initiating cells through the fatty acid receptor CD36. Nature 541 41–45. 10.1038/nature20791 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  159. Pedruzzi E., Guichard C., Ollivier V., Driss F., Fay M., Prunet C., et al. (2004). NAD(P)H oxidase Nox-4 Mediates 7-ketocholesterol-induced endoplasmic reticulum stress and apoptosis in human aortic smooth muscle cells. Mol. Cell. Biol. 24 10703–10717. 10.1128/mcb.24.24.10703-10717.2004 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  160. Peet D. J., Turley S. D., Ma W., Janowski B. A., Lobaccaro J. M. A., Hammer R. E., et al. (1998). Cholesterol and bile acid metabolism are impaired in mice lacking the nuclear oxysterol receptor LXRα. Cell 93 693–704. 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81432-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  161. Pinkwart K., Schneider F., Lukoseviciute M., Sauka-Spengler T., Lyman E., Eggeling C., et al. (2019). Nanoscale dynamics of cholesterol in the cell membrane. J. Biol. Chem. 294 12599–12609. 10.1074/jbc.RA119.009683 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  162. Plaisance V., Brajkovic S., Tenenbaum M., Favre D., Ezanno H., Bonnefond A., et al. (2016). Endoplasmic reticulum stress links oxidative stress to impaired pancreatic beta-cell function caused by human oxidized LDL. PLoS One 11:e0163046. 10.1371/journal.pone.0163046 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  163. Poznyak A. V., Nikiforov N. G., Markin A. M., Kashirskikh D. A., Myasoedova V. A., Gerasimova E. V., et al. (2021). Overview of OxLDL and Its Impact on Cardiovascular Health: focus on Atherosclerosis. Front. Pharmacol. 11:613780. 10.3389/fphar.2020.613780 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  164. Puchałowicz K., Ra′c M. E. (2020). The multifunctionality of CD36 in diabetes mellitus and its complications—update in pathogenesis, treatment and monitoring. Cells 9:1877. 10.3390/cells9081877 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  165. Rabini R. A., Fumelli P., Galassi R., Dousset N., Taus M., Ferretti G., et al. (1994). Increased susceptibility to lipid oxidation of low-density lipoproteins and erythrocyte membranes from diabetic patients. Metabolism 43 1470–1474. 10.1016/0026-0495(94)90003-5 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  166. Radford H., Moreno J. A., Verity N., Halliday M., Mallucci G. R. (2015). PERK inhibition prevents tau-mediated neurodegeneration in a mouse model of frontotemporal dementia. Acta Neuropathol. 130 633–642. 10.1007/s00401-015-1487-z [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  167. Rawson R. B. (2003). The SREBP pathway - Insights from insigs and insects. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 4 631–640. 10.1038/nrm1174 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  168. Ren J., Bi Y., Sowers J. R., Hetz C., Zhang Y. (2021). Endoplasmic reticulum stress and unfolded protein response in cardiovascular diseases. Nat. Rev. Cardiol. 0123456789. 10.1038/s41569-021-00511-w [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  169. Repa J. J., Mangelsdorf D. J. (2000). The role of orphan nuclear receptors in the regulation of cholesterol homeostasis. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 16 459–481. 10.1146/annurev.cellbio.16.1.459 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  170. Rhoads J. P., Major A. S. (2018). How oxidized low-density lipoprotein activates inflammatory responses. Crit. Rev. Immunol. 38 333–342. 10.1615/CritRevImmunol.2018026483 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  171. Richardson V. R., Smith K. A., Carter A. M. (2013). Adipose tissue inflammation: feeding the development of type 2 diabetes mellitus. Immunobiology 218 1497–1504. 10.1016/j.imbio.2013.05.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  172. Ron D., Walter P. (2007). Signal integration in the endoplasmic reticulum unfolded protein response. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 8 519–529. 10.1038/nrm2199 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  173. Rottiers V., Näär A. M. (2012). MicroRNAs in metabolism and metabolic disorders. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 13 239–251. 10.1038/nrm3313 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  174. Rozpedek W., Pytel D., Mucha B., Leszczynska H., Diehl J. A., Majsterek I. (2016). The role of the PERK/eIF2α/ATF4/CHOP signaling pathway in tumor progression during endoplasmic reticulum stress. Curr. Mol. Med. 16 533–544. 10.2174/1566524016666160523143937 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  175. Russell D. W. (2000). Oxysterol biosynthetic enzymes. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Mol. Cell Biol. Lipids 1529 126–135. 10.1016/S1388-1981(00)00142-6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  176. Russell D. W. (2003). The enzymes, regulation, and genetics of bile acid synthesis. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 72 137–174. 10.1146/annurev.biochem.72.121801.161712 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  177. Saklayen M. G. (2018). The global epidemic of the metabolic syndrome. Curr. Hypertens. Rep. 20:12. 10.1007/s11906-018-0812-z [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  178. Samson S., Mundkur L., Kakkar V. V. (2012). Immune response to lipoproteins in atherosclerosis. Cholesterol 2012:571846. 10.1155/2012/571846 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  179. Sanson M., Augé N., Vindis C., Muller C., Bando Y., Thiers J. C., et al. (2009). Oxidized low-density lipoproteins trigger endoplasmic reticulum stress in vascular cells: prevention by oxygen-regulated protein 150 expression. Circ. Res. 104 328–336. 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.108.183749 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  180. Santiago-Fernández C., Pérez-Belmonte L. M., Millán-Gómez M., Moreno-Santos I., Carrasco-Chinchilla F., Ruiz-Salas A., et al. (2019). Overexpression of scavenger receptor and infiltration of macrophage in epicardial adipose tissue of patients with ischemic heart disease and diabetes. J. Transl. Med. 17:95. 10.1186/s12967-019-1842-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  181. Santos A. L., Preta G. (2018). Lipids in the cell: organisation regulates function. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 75 1909–1927. 10.1007/s00018-018-2765-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  182. Santosa S., Varady K. A., AbuMweis S., Jones P. J. H. (2007). Physiological and therapeutic factors affecting cholesterol metabolism: does a reciprocal relationship between cholesterol absorption and synthesis really exist? Life Sci. 80 505–514. 10.1016/j.lfs.2006.10.006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  183. Sawamura T., Kume N., Aoyama T., Moriwaki H., Hoshikawa H., Aiba Y., et al. (1997). An endothelial receptor for oxidized low-density lipoprotein. Nature 386 73–77. 10.1038/386073a0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  184. Scheper W., Hoozemans J. J. M. (2015). The unfolded protein response in neurodegenerative diseases: a neuropathological perspective. Acta Neuropathol. 130 315–331. 10.1007/s00401-015-1462-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  185. Schroder H., Marrugat J., Fíto M., Weinbrenner T., Covas M. I. (2006). Alcohol consumption is directly associated with circulating oxidized low-density lipoprotein. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 40 1474–1481. 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2005.12.014 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  186. Schroeter H., Spencer J. P. E., Rice-Evans C., Williams R. J. (2001). Flavonoids protect neurons from oxidized low-density-lipoprotein-induced apoptosis involving c-Jun N-terminal kinase (JNK), c-Jun and caspase-3. Biochem. J 358 547–557. 10.1042/0264-6021:3580547 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  187. Schuh J., Fairclough G. F., Haschemeyer R. H. (1978). Oxygen-mediated heterogeneity of apo-low-density lipoprotein. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 75 3173–3177. 10.1073/pnas.75.7.3173 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  188. Scoles D. R., Xu X., Wang H., Tran H., Taylor-Harding B., Li A., et al. (2010). Liver X receptor agonist inhibits proliferation of ovarian carcinoma cells stimulated by oxidized low density lipoprotein. Gynecol. Oncol. 116 109–116. 10.1016/j.ygyno.2009.09.034 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  189. Selkoe D. J. (2004). Erratum: folding proteins in fatal ways (Nature (2003) 426 (900-904)). Nature 428:445. 10.1038/nature02477 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  190. Shah S., Iqbal M., Karam J., Salifu M., McFarlane S. I. (2007). Oxidative stress, glucose metabolism, and the prevention of type 2 diabetes: pathophysiological insights. Antioxid. Redox Signal. 9 911–929. 10.1089/ars.2007.1629 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  191. Shattock S. G. (1909). A report upon the pathological condition of the aorta of king menephtah, traditionally regarded as the pharaoh of the exodus. J. R. Soc. Med. 2 122–127. 10.1177/003591570900201110 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  192. Shekhar S., Khan R., Ferreira D. M., Mitsi E., German E., Rørvik G. H., et al. (2018). Antibodies reactive to commensal Streptococcus mitis show cross-reactivity with virulent Streptococcus pneumoniae serotypes. Front. Immunol. 9:747. 10.3389/fimmu.2018.00747 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  193. Shepherd J. (1994). Lipoprotein metabolism: an overview. Drugs 47 1–10. 10.2165/00003495-199400472-00003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  194. Shin J., He M., Liu Y., Paredes S., Villanova L., Brown K., et al. (2013). Correction to SIRT7 represses Myc activity to suppress ER stress and prevent fatty liver disease. [Cell Reports 5, 7, (2013)] 654-665. Cell Rep. 5:1479. 10.1016/j.celrep.2013.11.036 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  195. Shiri-Sverdlov R., Dos Reis I. M., Oligschlaeger Y., Hendrikx T., Meesters D. M., Vanclooster A., et al. (2021). The influence of a conjugated pneumococcal vaccination on plasma antibody levels against oxidized low-density lipoprotein in metabolic disease patients: a single-arm pilot clinical trial. Antioxidants 10:129. 10.3390/antiox10010129 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  196. Siddiqui K., George T. P., Nawaz S. S., Yaslam M., Almogbel E., Al-Rubeaan K. (2019). Significance of glycated LDL in different stages of diabetic nephropathy. Diabetes Metab. Syndr. Clin. Res. Rev. 13 548–552. 10.1016/j.dsx.2018.11.023 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  197. Soccio R. E., Breslow J. L. (2004). Intracellular cholesterol transport. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 24 1150–1160. 10.1161/01.ATV.0000131264.66417.d5 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  198. Song G., Wu X., Zhang P., Yu Y., Yang M., Jiao P., et al. (2016). High-density lipoprotein inhibits ox-LDL-induced adipokine secretion by upregulating SR-BI expression and suppressing ER Stress pathway. Sci. Rep. 6:30889. 10.1038/srep30889 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  199. Soran H., Durrington P. N. (2011). Susceptibility of LDL and its subfractions to glycation. Curr. Opin. Lipidol. 22 254–261. 10.1097/MOL.0b013e328348a43f [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  200. Soto C. (2003). Unfolding the role of protein misfolding in neurodegenerative diseases. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 4 49–60. 10.1038/nrn1007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  201. Sriburi R., Bommiasamy H., Buldak G. L., Robbins G. R., Frank M., Jackowski S., et al. (2007). Coordinate regulation of phospholipid biosynthesis and secretory pathway gene expression in XBP-1(S)-induced endoplasmic reticulum biogenesis. J. Biol. Chem. 282 7024–7034. 10.1074/jbc.M609490200 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  202. Steinberg D. (2002). Atherogenesis in perspective: hypercholesterolemia and inflammation as partners in crime. Nat. Med. 8 1211–1217. 10.1038/nm1102-1211 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  203. Steinberg D. (2009). The LDL modification hypothesis of atherogenesis: an update. J. Lipid Res. 50 S376–S381. 10.1194/jlr.R800087-JLR200 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  204. Steinbrecher U. P., Fisher M., Witztum J. L., Curtiss L. K. (1984). Immunogenicity of homologous low density lipoprotein after methylation, ethylation, acetylation, or carbamylation: generation of antibodies specific for derivatized lysine. J. Lipid Res. 25 1109–1116. 10.1016/s0022-2275(20)37720-8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  205. Stocker R., Keaney J. F. (2004). Role of oxidative modifications in atherosclerosis. Physiol. Rev. 84 1381–1478. 10.1152/physrev.00047.2003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  206. Stutzbach L. D., Xie S. X., Naj A. C., Albin R., Gilman S., Lee V. M. Y., et al. (2014). The unfolded protein response is activated in disease-affected brain regions in progressive supranuclear palsy and Alzheimer’s disease. Acta Neuropathol. Commun. 2:31. 10.1186/2051-5960-1-31 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  207. Subach F. V., Patterson G. H., Manley S., Gillette J. M., Lippincott-Schwartz J., Verkhusha V. V. (2009). Photoactivatable mCherry for high-resolution two-color fluorescence microscopy. Nat. Methods 6 153–159. 10.1038/nmeth.1298 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  208. Sun Y. X., Minthon L., Wallmark A., Warkentin S., Blennow K., Janciauskiene S. (2003). Inflammatory markers in matched plasma and cerebrospinal fluid from patients with Alzheimer’s disease. Dement. Geriatr. Cogn. Disord. 16 136–144. 10.1159/000071001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  209. Sun Y., Zhang D., Liu X., Li X., Liu F., Yu Y., et al. (2018). Endoplasmic reticulum stress affects lipid metabolism in atherosclerosis Via CHOP activation and over-expression of miR-33. Cell. Physiol. Biochem. 48 1995–2010. 10.1159/000492522 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  210. Tamura Y., Kawano S., Endo T., Endo T. (2020). Lipid homeostasis in mitochondria. Biol. Chem. 401 821–833. 10.1515/hsz-2020-0121 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  211. Tao Y. K., Yu P. L., Bai Y. P., Yan S. T., Zhao S. P., Zhang G. Q. (2016). Role of PERK/eIF2α/CHOP endoplasmic reticulum stress pathway in oxidized low-density lipoprotein mediated induction of endothelial apoptosis. Biomed. Environ. Sci. 29 868–876. 10.3967/bes2016.116 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  212. Todd D. J., Lee A. H., Glimcher L. H. (2008). The endoplasmic reticulum stress response in immunity and autoimmunity. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 8 663–674. 10.1038/nri2359 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  213. Trzaskos J. M., Gaylor J. L. (1985). “Membrane-bound enzymes of cholesterol biosynthesis:resolution and identification of the components required for cholesterol synthesis from squalene,” in The Enzymes of Biological Membranes, ed. Martonosi A. N. (Boston, MA: Springer; ), 177–204. 10.1007/978-1-4613-2355-6_5 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  214. Uzun H., Benian A., Madazli R., Topçuoǧlu M. A., Aydin S., Albayrak M. (2005). Circulating oxidized low-density lipoprotein and paraoxonase activity in preeclampsia. Gynecol. Obstet. Invest. 60 195–200. 10.1159/000087205 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  215. Van Leeuwen F. W., De Kleijn D. P. V., Van Den Hurk H. H., Neubauer A., Sonnemans M. A. F., Sluijs J. A., et al. (1998). Frameshift mutants of β amyloid precursor protein and ubiquitin-B in Alzheimer’s and Down patients. Science 279 242–247. 10.1126/science.279.5348.242 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  216. Van Meer G., Voelker D. R., Feigenson G. W. (2008). Membrane lipids: where they are and how they behave. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 9 112–124. 10.1038/nrm2330 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  217. Veeresh P., Kaur H., Sarmah D., Mounica L., Verma G., Kotian V., et al. (2019). Endoplasmic reticulum–mitochondria crosstalk: from junction to function across neurological disorders. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 1457 41–60. 10.1111/nyas.14212 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  218. Venugopal S. K., Jialal I. (2020). Biochemistry, Low Density Lipoprotein. Available online at: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29763186 (accessed December 16, 2020). [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  219. Verfaillie T., Rubio N., Garg A. D., Bultynck G., Rizzuto R., Decuypere J. P., et al. (2012). PERK is required at the ER-mitochondrial contact sites to convey apoptosis after ROS-based ER stress. Cell Death Differ. 19 1880–1891. 10.1038/cdd.2012.74 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  220. Verkhratsky A. (2005). Physiology and pathophysiology of the calcium store in the endoplasmic reticulum of neurons. Physiol. Rev. 85 201–279. 10.1152/physrev.00004.2004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  221. Vlassara H. (2001). The AGE-receptor in the pathogenesis of diabetic complications. Diabetes. Metab. Res. Rev. 17 436–443. 10.1002/dmrr.233 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  222. Volmer R., Ron D. (2015). Lipid-dependent regulation of the unfolded protein response. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 33 67–73. 10.1016/j.ceb.2014.12.002 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  223. Wahrle S., Das P., Nyborg A. C., McLendon C., Shoji M., Kawarabayashi T., et al. (2002). Cholesterol-dependent γ-secretase activity in buoyant cholesterol-rich membrane microdomains. Neurobiol. Dis. 9 11–23. 10.1006/nbdi.2001.0470 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  224. Walther T. C., Farese R. V. (2012). Lipid droplets and cellular lipid metabolism. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 81 687–714. 10.1146/annurev-biochem-061009-102430 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  225. Wang J., He W., Tsai P., Chen P., Ye M., Guo J., et al. (2020). Mutual interaction between endoplasmic reticulum and mitochondria in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Lipids Health Dis. 19 1–19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  226. Wang J., Mitsche M. A., Lütjohann D., Cohen J. C., Xie X. S., Hobbs H. H. (2015). Relative roles of ABCG5/ABCG8 in liver and intestine. J. Lipid Res. 56 319–330. 10.1194/jlr.M054544 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  227. Wang M. L., Motamed M., Infante R. E., Abi-Mosleh L., Kwon H. J., Brown M. S., et al. (2010). Identification of surface residues on Niemann-Pick C2 essential for hydrophobic handoff of cholesterol to NPC1 in lysosomes. Cell Metab. 12 166–173. 10.1016/j.cmet.2010.05.016 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  228. Wang P., Xu T. Y., Guan Y. F., Su D. F., Fan G. R., Miao C. Y. (2009). Perivascular adipose tissue-derived visfatin is a vascular smooth muscle cell growth factor: role of nicotinamide mononucleotide. Cardiovasc. Res. 81 370–380. 10.1093/cvr/cvn288 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  229. Wang X., Wang W., Li L., Perry G., Lee H., Zhu X. (2014). Oxidative stress and mitochondrial dysfunction in Alzheimer’s disease. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Mol. Basis Dis 1842 1240–1247. 10.1016/j.bbadis.2013.10.015 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  230. Wang Z., Nicholls S. J., Rodriguez E. R., Kummu O., Hörkkö S., Barnard J., et al. (2007). Protein carbamylation links inflammation, smoking, uremia and atherogenesis. Nat. Med. 13 1176–1184. 10.1038/nm1637 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  231. Wilhelm L. P., Wendling C., Védie B., Kobayashi T., Chenard M., Tomasetto C., et al. (2017). STARD 3 mediates endoplasmic reticulum-to-endosome cholesterol transport at membrane contact sites. EMBO J. 36 1412–1433. 10.15252/embj.201695917 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  232. Wong C. R., Nguyen M. H., Lim J. K. (2016). Hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. World J. Gastroenterol. 22 8294–8303. 10.3748/wjg.v22.i37.8294 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  233. Wu L., Lv Y., Lv Y., Xiang S., Zhao Z., Tang Z., et al. (2021). A novel secretagogin/ATF4 pathway is involved in oxidized LDL-induced endoplasmic reticulum stress and islet β-cell apoptosis. Acta Biochim. Biophys. Sin. (Shanghai). 53 54–62. 10.1093/abbs/gmaa142 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  234. Wu M., Chen Y., Wilson K., Chirindel A., Ihnat M. A., Yu Y., et al. (2008). Intraretinal leakage and oxidation of LDL in diabetic retinopathy. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 49 2679–2685. 10.1167/iovs.07-1440 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  235. Xie L., Lin H., Wang C. (2019). Elevation of serum oxLDL/β2-GPI complexes was correlated with diabetic microvascular complications in Type 2 diabetes mellitus patients. J. Clin. Lab. Anal. 33 1–7. 10.1002/jcla.22676 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  236. Xie X. Z., Huang X., Zhao S. P., Yu B. L., Zhong Q. Q., Cao J. (2016). L-4F inhibits oxidized low-density lipoprotein-induced inflammatory adipokine secretion via cyclic AMP/protein kinase A-CCAAT/enhancer binding protein β signaling pathway in 3T3-L1 adipocytes. Chin. Med. J. (Engl) 129 1108–1112. 10.4103/0366-6999.180519 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  237. Xu C., Bailly-Maitre B., Reed J. C. (2005). Endoplasmic reticulum stress: cell life and death decisions. J. Clin. Invest. 115 2656–2664. 10.1172/JCI26373 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  238. Xu R., Bi C., Song J., Wang L., Ge C., Liu X., et al. (2015). Upregulation of miR-142-5p in atherosclerotic plaques and regulation of oxidized low-density lipoprotein-induced apoptosis in macrophages. Mol. Med. Rep. 11 3229–3234. 10.3892/mmr.2015.3191 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  239. Yang S., Wu M., Li X., Zhao R., Zhao Y., Liu L., et al. (2020). Role of endoplasmic reticulum stress in atherosclerosis and its potential as a therapeutic target. Oxid. Med. Cell. Longev. 2020 10.1155/2020/9270107 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  240. Yoshioka H., Coates H. W., Chua N. K., Hashimoto Y., Brown A. J., Ohgane K. (2020). A key mammalian cholesterol synthesis enzyme, squalene monooxygenase, is allosterically stabilized by its substrate. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 117 7150–7158. 10.1073/pnas.1915923117 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  241. Yoshizawa T., Karim M. F., Sato Y., Senokuchi T., Miyata K., Fukuda T., et al. (2014). SIRT7 controls hepatic lipid metabolism by regulating the ubiquitin-proteasome pathway. Cell Metab. 19 712–721. 10.1016/j.cmet.2014.03.006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  242. Younossi Z., Anstee Q. M., Marietti M., Hardy T., Henry L., Eslam M., et al. (2018). Global burden of NAFLD and NASH: trends, predictions, risk factors and prevention. Nat. Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 15 11–20. 10.1038/nrgastro.2017.109 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  243. Zahid M. K., Rogowski M., Ponce C., Choudhury M., Moustaid-Moussa N., Rahman S. M. (2020). CCAAT/enhancer-binding protein beta (C/EBPβ) knockdown reduces inflammation, ER stress, and apoptosis, and promotes autophagy in oxLDL-treated RAW264.7 macrophage cells. Mol. Cell. Biochem. 463 211–223. 10.1007/s11010-019-03642-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  244. Zannis V. I., Chroni A., Kypreos K. E., Kan H. Y., Cesar T. B., Zanni E. E., et al. (2004). Probing the pathways of chylomicron and HDL metabolism using adenovirus-mediated gene transfer. Curr. Opin. Lipidol. 15 151–166. 10.1097/00041433-200404000-00008 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  245. Zelcer N., Tontonoz P. (2006). Liver X receptors as integrators of metabolic and inflammatory signaling. J. Clin. Invest. 116 607–614. 10.1172/JCI27883 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  246. Zelcer N., Sharpe L. J., Loregger A., Kristiana I., Cook E. C. L., Phan L., et al. (2014). The E3 ubiquitin ligase MARCH6 degrades squalene monooxygenase and affects 3-Hydroxy-3-Methyl-Glutaryl coenzyme a reductase and the cholesterol synthesis pathway. Mol. Cell. Biol. 34 1262–1270. 10.1128/mcb.01140-13 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  247. Zhang E., Wu Y. (2014). Dual effects of miR-155 on macrophages at different stages of atherosclerosis: LDL is the key? Med. Hypotheses 83 74–78. 10.1016/j.mehy.2014.04.004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  248. Zhang Y., Ge C., Wang L., Liu X., Chen Y., Li M., et al. (2015). Induction of DKK1 by ox-LDL negatively regulates intracellular lipid accumulation in macrophages. FEBS Lett. 589 52–58. 10.1016/j.febslet.2014.11.023 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  249. Zhang Y., Whaley-Connell A. T., Sowers J. R., Ren J. (2018). Autophagy as an emerging target in cardiorenal metabolic disease: from pathophysiology to management. Pharmacol. Ther. 191 1–22. 10.1016/j.pharmthera.2018.06.004 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  250. Zhou A. X., Tabas I. (2013). The UPR in atherosclerosis. Semin. Immunopathol. 35 321–332. 10.1007/s00281-013-0372-x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  251. Zhou Z., Chen Y., Ni W., Liu T. (2019). Upregulation of nuclear factor IA suppresses oxidized low-density lipoprotein-induced endoplasmic reticulum stress and apoptosis in human umbilical vein endothelial cells. Med. Sci. Monit. 25 1009–1016. 10.12659/MSM.912132 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  252. Zimetti F., Favari E., Cagliero P., Adorni M. P., Ronda N., Bonardi R., et al. (2015). Cholesterol trafficking-related serum lipoprotein functions in children with cholesteryl ester storage disease. Atherosclerosis 242 443–449. 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2015.08.007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology are provided here courtesy of Frontiers Media SA

RESOURCES