In the past decades, progresses in cancer treatment have resulted in a doubling of survival, while up to half of cancer patients are still alive beyond 10 years after diagnosis [1], [2]. In view of this striking increase of survival, paralleled by a wide range of adverse impact of cancer treatment options with an aging population, a steady increase of cancer therapies-related cardiotoxicity load has been recognized [3]. There is an enhanced appreciation that adult cancer survivors have a worse cardiovascular outcome following several years after detection, which again appears to be stringent on the cancer subtype and treatment plan [4]. In this respect, there is an evolving close collaboration between cardiologists and oncologists for individualized patient care striving to improve cardiovascular and cancer outcome in these patients [2], [5]. Cardiovascular imaging in cancer patients may provide fourfold information such as (1) pre-therapy risk prediction, (2) diagnosis and monitoring of cardiotoxicity manifestation during cancer treatments, (3) assessment of late adverse cardiovascular alterations after treatment completion, and (4) identification and treatment monitoring of cardiac masses and infiltration [1], [2], [5]. For example, it is widely known that anthracycline-treatment on breast cancer patients may induce dose related and progressive left ventricular dysfunction leading to heart failure manifestation [6]. More recently introduced cancer therapies such as trastuzumab and other HER2 monoclonal antibodies, tyrosine kinase inhibitors, and immunotherapy have been realized to cause cardiotoxicity resulting in cardiac dysfunction [2], [7], [8]. For most cancer-related treatments, baseline and serial echocardiography examinations are commonly performed as first line imaging for a timely identification of early development of cardiotoxicity. Cardiotoxicity, as determined with echocardiography, is defined as new onset of left ventricular systolic dysfunction with a decrease in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) of ≥10% to a value <50% [9]. In order to identify and characterize subclinical cardiotoxicity at its early stage, speckle-tracking echocardiography with myocardial strain assessment is concurrently applied. While radial, circumferential, and longitudinal myocardial strain can be determined with speckle-tracking echocardiography, global longitudinal strain (GLS) has been identified as a sensitive and robust marker for the detection of subclinical and early stages of cancer-treatment related myocardial injury. A relative reduction in GLS ≥ 15% during cancer treatment from baseline is suggestive of early functional alterations before a drop in LVEF may ensue. It is important to keep in mind that the identification of subclinical and/or clinically-manifest left ventricular dysfunction likely leads to a change in the selection of a chemotherapeutic agent, the installation of cardioprotective treatment, and the timing of repeat monitoring imaging [9], [10]. In case of poor echocardiographic image quality, cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) is commonly conducted for the assessment of global LVEF and myocardial strain imaging with the use of tagging, displacement encoding with stimulated echoes (DENSE) and strain-encoded (SENC) imaging [1], [11]. Notably, CMR affords an accurate and unique characterization of the myocardial tissue with T2-weighted imaging and/or T1 and T2 parametric mapping for myocardial edema and inflammation, applying T1 and extracellular volume fraction (ECV) measurement for diffuse fibrosis, and late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) imaging for focal fibrosis and scar assessment [11].
In this issue of the IJC Heart & Vasculature, Egashira et al. [12] expand the cardiovascular imaging portfolio in the detection and characterization of cancer therapeutics–related cardiac dysfunction to cardiac contrast CT with assessment of increases of extracellular volume (ECV). In a feasibility in forty-four women with breast cancer, who underwent anthracycline treatment, contrast cardiac CT (CCT) identified late anthracycline-induced cardiotoxicity in seven patients. As it was observed, echocardiography-determined LVEF of the group with anthracycline-induced late cardiotoxicity was significantly lower than in the control group. In particular, the global longitudinal strain assessed by echocardiography and CCT-determined myocardial ECV in individuals with late anthracycline-induced cardiotoxicity was significantly lower than that of control group and in those individuals without anthracycline-induced cardiotoxicity. Such intial observations suggest indeed that anthracycline-induced cardiotoxicity could indeed be evaluated with CCT. The sensitivity and accuracy of CCT in the identification of cancer-treatment related early and late onset of cardiotoxicity as compared to echocardiography and/or CMR remains uncertain needing further well-designed clinical investigations. Given the radiation exposure of CCT, albeit relatively low, it appears unlikely that this approach may overcome established cardiovascular imaging modalities such as echocardiography and/or CMR. In particular, CMR affords an array of parameters for a comprehensive and accurate identification and characterization of cardiotoxicity affecting morphology and function of the myocardial tissue. Furthermore, there are emerging positron emission tomography (PET) radiotracer probes, such as 18F-mitophos, that can identify cancer-treatment related increases reactive oxygen species in the myocardial tissue in vivo [13], [14]. This approach appears promising for risk stratification of the potential manifestation of cancer-related cardiotoxicity warranting further clinical studies. Another interesting development is the PET radiotracer 68Ga-galmydar [15], which has capability to can assess the mitochondrial potential of the myocytes and, thus, the functional state even at cellular level. Conceptually, both 18F-mitophos and 68Ga-galmydar hold promise for an early identification and monitoring of cancer-treatment related cardiotoxicity and interrogating therapeutic efficacy of emerging cardio-protectants [13]. Overall, Egashira et al. [12] add first evidence that CCT can add to the cardiovascular imaging portfolio in the identification of anthracycline-induced cardiotoxicity. The diagnostic niche of CCT in this emerging field of the assessment of cancer-treatment related cardiotoxicity remains uncertain but likely may evolve within a comprehensive assessment of coronary morphology, myocardial perfusion, and myocardial structure for cardiovascular risk stratification in these cancer patients.
1. Sources of Funding
This work is supported by a departmental fund from Washington University (No. 12-3271-93128).
2. Disclosure
Dr. Schindler has received research support from NIH (1RO1HL142297-01A1) and from GE Healthcare.
3. Research data related to this submission
No data were used for the research described article in the article.
4. Conflict of Interest Statement
The authors report no relationships that could be construed as a conflict of interest.
References
- 1.Saunderson C.E.D., Plein S., Manisty C.H. Role of cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging in cardio-oncology. Eur. Heart. J. Cardiovasc. Imaging. 2021;22:383–396. doi: 10.1093/ehjci/jeaa345. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Michel L., Rassaf T., Totzeck M. Cardiotoxicity from immune checkpoint inhibitors. Int. J. Cardiol. Heart. Vasc. 2019;25:100420. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcha.2019.100420. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Lyon A.R., Dent S., Stanway S., Earl H., Brezden-Masley C., Cohen-Solal A. Baseline cardiovascular risk assessment in cancer patients scheduled to receive cardiotoxic cancer therapies: a position statement and new risk assessment tools from the Cardio-Oncology Study Group of the Heart Failure Association of the European Society of Cardiology in collaboration with the International Cardio-Oncology Society. Eur. J. Heart. Fail. 2020;22:1945–1960. doi: 10.1002/ejhf.1920. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Strongman H., Gadd S., Matthews A., Mansfield K.E., Stanway S., Lyon A.R. Medium and long-term risks of specific cardiovascular diseases in survivors of 20 adult cancers: a population-based cohort study using multiple linked UK electronic health records databases. Lancet. 2019;394:1041–1054. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)31674-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Hahn V.S., Zhang K.W., Sun L., Narayan V., Lenihan D.J., Ky B. Heart failure with targeted cancer therapies: Mechanisms and cardioprotection. Circ. Res. 2021;128(10):1576–1593. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.121.318223. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Mitry M.A., Edwards J.G. Doxorubicin induced heart failure: Phenotype and molecular mechanisms. Int. J. Cardiol. Heart. Vasc. 2016;10:17–24. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcha.2015.11.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Sato-Okabayashi Y., Isoda K., Heissig B., Kadoguchi T., Akita K., Kitamura K. Low-dose oral cyclophosphamide therapy reduces atherosclerosis progression by decreasing inflammatory cells in a murine model of atherosclerosis. Int. J. Cardiol. Heart. Vasc. 2020;28:100529. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcha.2020.100529. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Kouloubinis A., Sofroniadou S., Panoulas V.F., Makaritsis K., Revela I., Karavolias G. The role of TNF-alpha, Fas/Fas ligand system and NT-proBNP in the early detection of asymptomatic left ventricular dysfunction in cancer patients treated with anthracyclines. Int. J. Cardiol. Heart. Vasc. 2015;6:85–90. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcha.2015.01.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Wibawa Martha J., Soedarsono D.A., Iqbal M., Astuti A., Martanto E., Akbar M.R. The effect of prophylactic carvedilol on subclinical left ventricular dysfunction after 1 cycle FAC chemotherapy in breast cancer patients. Int. J. Cardiol. Heart. Vasc. 2020;29:100575. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcha.2020.100575. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Merlo M., Caiffa T., Gobbo M., Adamo L., Sinagra G. Reverse remodeling in Dilated Cardiomyopathy: Insights and future perspectives. Int. J. Cardiol. Heart. Vasc. 2018;18:52–57. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcha.2018.02.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Celutkiene J., Pudil R., Lopez-Fernandez T., Graspa J., Nihoyannopoulos P., Bergler-Klein J. Role of cardiovascular imaging in cancer patients receiving cardiotoxic therapies: a position statement on behalf of the Heart Failure Association (HFA), the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging (EACVI) and the Cardio-Oncology Council of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) Eur. J. Heart. Fail. 2020;22:1504–1524. doi: 10.1002/ejhf.1957. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Egashira K., Sueta D., Tomiguchi M., Kidoh M., Oda S., Usuku H. Cardiac computed tomography-derived extracellular volume fraction in late anthracycline-induced cardiotoxicity. Int. J. Cardiol. Heart. Vasc. 2021;24:100797. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcha.2021.100797. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Sivapackiam J., Sharma M., Schindler T.H., Sharma V. PET radiopharmaceuticals for imaging chemotherapy-induced cardiotoxicity. Curr. Cardiol. Rep. 2020;22:62. doi: 10.1007/s11886-020-01315-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Boutagy N.E., Wu J., Cai Z., Zhang W., Booth C.J., Kyriakides T.C. In vivo reactive oxygen species detection with a novel positron emission tomography tracer, (18)F-DHMT, allows for early detection of anthracycline-induced cardiotoxicity in rodents. JACC Basic Transl. Sci. 2018;3:378–390. doi: 10.1016/j.jacbts.2018.02.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Sivapackiam J., Kabra S., Speidel S., Sharma M., Laforest R., Salter A. 68Ga-Galmydar: A PET imaging tracer for noninvasive detection of Doxorubicin-induced cardiotoxicity. PLoS One. 2019;14:e0215579. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0215579. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]