Skip to main content
Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica logoLink to Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica
. 1986 Sep 1;27(3):421–439. doi: 10.1186/BF03548156

The Postpartum Reproductive Status of Dairy Cows in Two Areas in Iceland*

Reproduktionsstatus postpartum hos mjölkkor i två områden på Island

Jón Eldon 1,, Thorsteinn Ólafsson 1
PMCID: PMC8189366  PMID: 3565203

Abstract

The paper describes the postpartum (pp) reproductive performance of 252 dairy cows in 2 areas in Iceland, in the north (Eyjafjörður) and in the south (Skeið), during a 12 months period.

First pp ovulation occurred significantly earlier in primiparous cows, in cows in Skeið and in cows that calved in September—November.

The average time of first pp artificial insemination (ai) was 72 days in both areas. Conception rate to first ai in these cows was 58 % in Eyjafjörður and 53 % in Skeið and the number of ai per conception was 1.6 and 1.8, respectively. In Eyjafjörður, 23 % of the cows were inseminated at the time of first pp ovulation. Sixtytwo percent of these cows conceived. In Skeið, 20 cows were inseminated at the time of first pp ovulation, and 9 or 45 % of these cows conceived. The interval from calving to conception was, on the average, 92 days in Eyjafjörður and 100 days in Skeið.

Comparison of results from individual farms showed increase in number of conceptions to first pp ai (35–72 %) and decrease in number of services per conception (2.0–1.3) with increased mean number of days from calving to first ai (62–82 days).

Keywords: ovulation, artificial insemination, conception, primiparous cows

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (1.8 MB).

Acknowledgement

We thank Dr. H. Kindahl at the Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, for reviewing the manuscript, Dr. H. Thorsson at the Computing Services, University of Iceland, for his assistance in the statistical analysis and Mr. G. Steindórsson for his assistance on the farm. The study was supported by the International Atomic Energy Agency and the Icelandic Science Fund.

References

  1. Anderson, L. U. Emanuelson: An epidemiological study of hyper- ketonaemia in Swedish dairy cows; determinants and the relation to fertility. Submitted for publication.
  2. Andresen O, Onstad O. Brunstkontroll og drektighetskontroll hos ku ved hjelp av progesteron bestemmelse i melk (Control of oestrus and conception with the help of progesterone assay in milk) Norsk Vet.-Tidskr. 1979;91:411–421. [Google Scholar]
  3. Ayalon N. The repeat breeder problem. Vlaams Diergeneeskundig Tijdschrift. 1984;53:230–239. [Google Scholar]
  4. Ball P. Fertility problems in dairy herds. In Practice. 1983;5:189–194. doi: 10.1136/inpract.5.6.189. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Britt J H. Early postpartum breeding in dairy cows: A review. J. Dairy Sci. 1975;58:266–271. doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(75)84558-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Bulman DC, Lamming GE. Milk progesterone levels in relation to conception, repeat breeding and factors influencing acyclicity in dairy cows. J. Reprod. Fert. 1978;54:447–458. doi: 10.1530/jrf.0.0540447. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Castellanos R, Edqvist L-E. Evaluation of radioimmunoassay tehenique for the measurement of progesterone. Uppsala, Sweden: Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences (SLU); 1978. pp. 1–27. [Google Scholar]
  8. Cavestany D, Foote RH. The use of milk progesterone and electronic vaginal probes as aids in large dairy herd reproductive management. Cornell Vet. 1985;75:441–453. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Cavestany D, El-Wishy AB, Foote RH. Effect of season and high environmental temperature on fertility of Holstein cattle. J. Dairy Sci. 1985;68:1471–1478. doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(85)80985-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Chauhan F S, Mgongo FOK, Kessy BM. Recent advances in hormonal therapy of bovine reproductive disorders: A review. Vet. Bull. 1984;54:991–1009. [Google Scholar]
  11. Claus R, Karg H, Zwiauer I, von Butler I, Pirchner F, Rattenberger E. Analysis of factors influencing reproductive performance of the dairy cow by progesterone assay in milk-fat. Brit, vet. J. 1983;139:29–37. doi: 10.1016/S0007-1935(17)30586-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Coleman DA, Thayne WV, Dailey RA. Factors affecting reproductive performance of dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci. 1985;68:1793–1803. doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(85)81029-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Edqvist, LÆ., G. Fredriksson, H. Kindahi, K. Larsson & A. Madej: Short oestrous cycles post partum in cattle. In: “The use of nuclear technique to improve dometsic buffalo production in Asia”. International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna 1984, p. 79–83.
  14. Eldon J, Olafsson TH, Thorsteinsson TH. A survey of the postpartum reproductive performance of dairy cows with fertility problems in southern Iceland. Acta vet. scand. 1985;26:431–441. doi: 10.1186/BF03546515. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Halpern NE, Erb HN, Smith RD. Duration of retained fetal membranes and subsequent fertility in dairy cows. Theriogeno- logy. 1985;23:807–813. doi: 10.1016/0093-691X(85)90156-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Hansel W. Advances in physiology of growth, reproduction and lactation. Cornell Vet. 1985;75:56–76. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Haresign W, Foxcroft GR, Lamming GE. Control of ovulation in farm animals. J. Reprod. Fert. 1983;69:383–395. doi: 10.1530/jrf.0.0690383. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Hoffmann B, Günzler O, Hamburger R, Schmidt W. Milk progesterone as a parameter for fertility control in cattle; methodological approaches and present status of application in Germany. Brit. vet. J. 1976;132:469–476. doi: 10.1016/S0007-1935(17)34584-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Janson L. Studies on fertility traits in Swedish dairy cattle. Acta Agric. scand. 1980;30:109–124. doi: 10.1080/00015128009435256. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  20. Kindahi H, Edqvist L-E, Larsson K, Malmqvist Influence of prostaglandins. Factors Influencing Fertility in the Postpartum Cow. 1982;20:173–196. [Google Scholar]
  21. King GJ, Hurnik JF, Robertson HA. Ovarian function and estrus in dairy cow during early lactation. J. Anim. Sci. 1976;42:688–692. doi: 10.2527/jas1976.423688x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Lamming GE, Bulman DC. The use of milk progesterone radioimmunoassay in the diagnosis and treatment of subfertility in dairy cows. Brit. vet. J. 1976;132:507–517. doi: 10.1016/S0007-1935(17)34588-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Larsson K, Janson L, Berglund B, Edqvist L-E, Kindahi H. Postpartum reproductive performance in dairy cows. I. Influence of animal breed and parity. Acta vet. scand. 1984;25:445–461. doi: 10.1186/BF03547259. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Mather EC, Camper PM, Vahdat F, Whitmore HL, Gustafsson BG. Assessment of ovarian activity in the postpartum dairy cow by use of milk porgesterone assay. Theriogenology. 1978;10:119–129. doi: 10.1016/0093-691X(78)90012-2. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  25. McNatty KP, Hudson N, Gibb M, Henderson KM, Lun S, Hearth D, Montgomery GW. Seasonal differences in ovarian activity in cows. J. En doer. 1984;102:189–198. doi: 10.1677/joe.0.1020189. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Montgomery GW, Scott LC, Hudson N. An interaction between season of calving and nutrition on the resumption of ovarian cycles in postpartum beef cattle. J. Rep rod. Fert. 1985;73:45–50. doi: 10.1530/jrf.0.0730045. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Morrow DA, Roberts SJ, McEntee K. Postpartum ovarian activity and involution of the uterus and cervix in dairy cattle. I. Ovarian activity. Cornell Vet. 1969;59:173–190. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Oltner R, Edqvist L-E. Progesteron i mjölk. 1980. Progesteron i mjölk (Progesterone in milk) pp. 4–28. [Google Scholar]
  29. Oltner R, Edqvist L-E. Progesterone in defatted milk: Its relation to insemination and pregnancy in normal cows as compared with cows on problem farms and in individual problem animals. Brit. vet. J. 1981;137:78–87. doi: 10.1016/S0007-1935(17)31791-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Reimers TJ, Smith RD, Newman SK. Management factors affecting reproductive performance of dairy cows in the Northeastern United States. J. Dairy Sci. 1985;68:963–972. doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(85)80916-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Roine K, Saloniemi H. Incidence of infertility in dairy cows. Acta vet. scand. 1978;19:354–367. doi: 10.1186/BF03547605. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Rosenberg M, Herz Z, Davidson M, Folman Y. Seasonal variations in post-partum plasma progesterone levels and conception in primiparous and multiparous dairy cows, J. Rep rod. Fert. 1977;51:363–367. doi: 10.1530/jrf.0.0510363. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Ryan TA, Jr., Joiner BA, Ryan BA. Minitab Reference Manual. 1982. [Google Scholar]
  34. SHS (Association for Swedish Livestock Breeding and Production): Annual Report 1985, p. 1–139.
  35. Williams GL, Talavera F, Petersen BJ, Kirsch JD, Tilton JE. Coincident secretion of follicle-stimulating hormone and luteinizing hormone in early postpartum beef cows: Effects of suckilgn and low-level increase of systematic progesterone. Biol. Reprod. 1983;29:362–373. doi: 10.1095/biolreprod29.2.362. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Zeddies J. Special economic aspects of fertility related to Central European farming conditions. Factors Influencing Fertility in the Postpartum Cow. 1982;20:425–441. [Google Scholar]

Articles from Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica are provided here courtesy of BMC

RESOURCES