Skip to main content
Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica logoLink to Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica
. 1986 Jun 1;27(2):209–222. doi: 10.1186/BF03548165

An Epidemiological and Genetic Study on Registered Diseases in Finnish Ayrshire Cattle

III. Metabolic Diseases

En epidemiologisk och genetisk undersökning au sjukdomsdata från finsk Ayrshire boskap. III. Metaboliska sjukdomar

Yrjö Gröhn 16,26,, Hannu Saloniemi 16,26, Jouko Syväjärvi 16,26
PMCID: PMC8189371  PMID: 3799398

Abstract

The epidemiology of clinical ketosis, hypocalcaemia and hypomagnesaemia was examined. In addition, the genetic variability of ketosis and parturient paresis was investigated. The data set consisted of the lactation records of 70,775 Finnish Ayrshire dairy cows. Each cow was under observation for 2 days before and for 305 days after calving. Lactation incidence rates (%) were: ketosis 6.0, parturient paresis 3.8, non-parturient paresis 0.6, hypomagnesaemic tetany, outdoor 0.6, and indoor 0.2. These diseases formed 22 % of all first treatments by veterinarians during farm visits. 92 % of the cases of ketosis occurred with 8 weeks of parturition, with the highest occurrence 3–5 weeks after calving. Four % of cases of parturient paresis occurred before, and 45 % within 24 h after calving. When cases were categorized by month of calving the risk of ketosis was higher during indoor feeding (October-April) than during outdoor feeding (May-September). The risk of parturient paresis did not significantly vary with month of calving. The occurrence of ketosis increased with parity up to the 4th and decreased thereafter. The occurrence of parturient paresis increased with parity. Both the increase in herd milk yield and the increase in individual milk yields were positively associated with the occurrence of ketosis and parturient paresis. The cows with a history of the reproductive tract infection had a higher risk of contracting ketosis. Heritability estimates for ketosis in various parity groups were from 1.6 % to 4.1 % on the binomial scale (corresponding to 7.3 %–14.4 % on the normal scale), and for parturient paresis from 3.5 to 10.5% (corresponding from 18.3 % to 27.4 %). The genetic correlation between ketosis and parturient paresis, and these and current milk production for all material were insignificant.

Keywords: disease documentation, heritability, ketosis, parturient paresis, nοn-parturient paresis, hypomagnesaemic tetany, dairy cows

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (1.4 MB).

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Pol. Lic. Juni Palmgren for advice on logistic regression, and the Agricultural Data Processing Centre for supplying computer facilities for statistical analysis.

References

  1. Bäckström L, Mattsson J, Wallin O, Vílson B. Praktikjournalförsöket i Skaraborgs län 1971-1973. (Practice journal experiment in the county of Skaraborg 1971-1973) Svensk. Vet.-Tidn. 1975;27:238–250. [Google Scholar]
  2. Cox D R. Analysis of Binary Data. London: Chapman and Hall; 1970. [Google Scholar]
  3. Curtis C R, Erb H N, Sniffen C J, Smith R D. Epidemiology of parturient paresis: predisposing f act ors with emphasis on dry cow feeding and management. J. Dairy Sci. 1984;67:817–825. doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(84)81372-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Dohoo I R, Martin S W, McMillan I, Kennedy B W. Disease, production and culling in Holstein-Friesian cows. II. Age, season and sire effects. Prev. Vet. Med. 1984;2:655–670. doi: 10.1016/0167-5877(84)90012-6. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  5. Dohoo I R, Martin S W, Meek A H, Sandals W C D. Disease, production and culling in Holstein — Friesian cows. I. The data. Prev. Vet. Med. 1983;1:321–334. doi: 10.1016/0167-5877(83)90003-X. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  6. Dyrendahl I, Henricson B, Jönsson G. Clinical puerperal paresis and hypocalcaemia in cattle. A statistical and genetic investigation. Zbl. vet. med., A. 1972;19:621–638. doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0442.1972.tb00517.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Ekesbo I. Acta agrie, scand. 1966. Disease incidence in tied and loose housed dairy cattle. [Google Scholar]
  8. Elleby F, Jochumsen P, Veirup N H. Forekomst af kvægsygdomme i 6 danske kontrolfoireninger i 1967/68. (Disease incidence within six Danish milk recording societies) 1969. pp. 77–90. [Google Scholar]
  9. Erb H N, Martin S W. Relationships between production and reproductive diseases in Holstein cows. Data. J. Dairy Sci. 1980;63:1911–1917. doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(80)83158-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Feinberg S E. The Analysis of Grosis-Classified Categorical Data. 2. Cambridge, Massachusets: MIT Press; 1980. [Google Scholar]
  11. Grohn Y, Saloniemi H, Syväjärvi J. An epidemiological and genetic study on registered diseases in Finnish Ayrshire cattle. I. The data, disease occurrence and culling. Acta vet. scand. 1986;27:182–195. doi: 10.1186/BF03548163. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Grohn Y, Thompson J R, Bruss M L. Epidemiology and genetic basis of ketosis in Finnish Ayrshire cattle. Prev. Vet. Med. 1984;3:65–77. doi: 10.1016/0167-5877(84)90025-4. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  13. Littledike E T, Young J W, Beiti D C. Common metabolic disease of cattle: ketosis, milk fever, grass tetany, and downer cow complex. J. Dairy Sci. 1981;64:1465–1482. doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(81)82715-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Meijering A. 36th Ann. Meet. Europ. Assoc. Animal Product. 1985. Practical aspects in the estimation of parameters and breeding values for all-or-none traits. [Google Scholar]
  15. Norman H D, Van Vleck L D. Type appraisal: II. Variation in type traits due to sires, herds, and years. J. Dairy Sci. 1972;55:1717–1725. doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(72)85749-7. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  16. O'Bleness G V, Van Vleck L D, Henderson C R. Heritabilities of some type appraisal traits and their genetic and phenotypic correlations with production. J. Dairy Sci. 1960;43:1490–1498. doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(60)90354-4. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  17. Øuerby I, Aas Hansen M, Jonsgård K, Sognen E. Bovine ketosis. I. Occurrence and incidence in herds affected by ketosis in Eastern Norway 1965-1968. Nord, Vet.-Med. 1974;26:353–361. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Pehrsson B. Acta vet. scand. 1966. Studies on ketosis in dairy cows. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Portnoy S. Maximizing the probability of correctly ordering random variables using linear predictors. J. Mult. Anal. 1982;12:256–269. doi: 10.1016/0047-259X(82)90019-7. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  20. Ray A A. SAS User's Guide: Statistics. Cary, NC: SAS Institute Inc.; 1982. [Google Scholar]
  21. Saloniemi H, Grohn Y, Syväjärvi J. An epidemiological and genetic study on registered diseases in Finnish Ayrshire cattle. II. Reproductive disorders. Acta vet. scand. 1986;27:196–208. doi: 10.1186/BF03548164. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Saloniemi H, Roine K. Incidence of some metabolic diseases in dairy cows. Nord. Vet-Med. 1981;33:289–296. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Schwabe C W. The current epidemiological revolution in veterinary medicine. Part I. Prev. Vet. Med. 1982;1:5–15. doi: 10.1016/0167-5877(82)90003-4. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  24. Solbu H. Disease recording in Norwegian dairy cattle. I. Disease incidence and non-genetic effects on mastitis, ketosis, and milk fever. Z. Tierz. Zuechtungsbiol. 1983;100:139–156. doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0388.1983.tb00720.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  25. Solbu H. Disease recording in Norwegian dairy cattle. II. Heritability estimates and progeny testing for mas-tits, ketosis and “all diseases”. Z. Tierzüchtg. Züchtsbiol. 1984;101:51–58. doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0388.1984.tb00021.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  26. Van Vleck L D. Variation in type appraisal scores due to sire and herd effects. J. Dairy Sci. 1964;47:1249–1256. doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(64)88890-1. [DOI] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica are provided here courtesy of BMC

RESOURCES