Economic Burden and Impact on Quality of Life of Herpes Zoster in Spanish Adults Aged 50 Years or Older: A Prospective Cohort Study

Abstract

Introduction

The economic burden of herpes zoster (HZ), including its most common complication, postherpetic neuralgia (PHN), and its impact on health-related quality of life (HRQL) is not well described in Spain. The aim of this study was to estimate HZ-related healthcare costs and impact on HRQL in Spanish adults aged 50 years or older.

Methods

A prospective, observational study was performed with patients with HZ recruited through four general practitioner networks in Spain (NCT01521286). HRQL data were collected using the EuroQoL-5 Dimension (EQ-5D) questionnaire; HZ-related pain and associated interference with activities of daily living (ADL) were assessed using the Zoster Brief Pain Inventory (ZBPI) questionnaire at days 0 (HZ rash onset), 15, 30, 60, and 90; patients with PHN were assessed up until day 270. Medical resource utilization was recorded throughout study follow-up. Work loss for patients/caregivers was also assessed. Costs were calculated from both the payer and societal perspectives.

Results

A total of 545 patients with Hz were included, of whom 25 developed PHN. During days 0–30 post HZ diagnosis, the mean EQ-5D utility score was 0.738, equating to a utility loss of 0.138. Sleep was the ADL most affected component. The mean costs for HZ in the overall cohort were €240 and €296 from the payer/societal perspective, respectively; €187/€242 for patients with HZ without any HZ-related complications; and €571/€712 for patients who developed PHN. The majority of costs were incurred during days 0–30.

Conclusions

In Spain, HZ and HZ-related complications such as PHN reduce patient HRQL and increase the economic burden for both payers and society in general.

Trail Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT01521286.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12325-021-01717-7.

Key Summary Points

Why carry out this study?

Herpes zoster is a disease caused by the reactivation of the chickenpox virus. Approximately 30% of adults will develop herpes zoster in their lifetime.

Significant pain which may last for months—postherpetic neuralgia (PHN)—is an important complication.

Spanish data on the impact of herpes zoster and PHN is mainly from retrospective studies. We conducted a prospective study to evaluate the impact on the quality of life of patients at least 50 years of age and costs related to HZ and complications.

What was learned from the study?

Herpes zoster and PHN have a substantial economic burden and impact on the quality of life of adults at least 50 years of age in Spain.

The data from this study can help inform cost-effectiveness estimations of the benefit of vaccination strategies against herpes zoster.

Digital Features

This article is published with digital features, including a summary slide, to facilitate understanding of the article. To view digital features for this article go to https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.14229665.

Introduction

Herpes zoster (HZ) is caused by the reactivation of varicella-zoster virus which remains latent in sensory ganglia after a previous varicella infection. HZ typically manifests as a unilateral, painful, vesicular rash limited to the affected dermatome [1]. For most patients, HZ resolves within 1 month of rash onset. The most common complication of HZ is postherpetic neuralgia (PHN), clinically significant pain persisting or appearing 3 months after rash onset [2]. Pain during the acute HZ episode or PHN may have a substantial negative impact on patients’ health-related quality of life (HRQL) and their physical/social activities [3–9]. The economic costs of HZ can be substantial [10].

HZ is relatively common, and incidence rates increase with increasing age [11], rising from 3.4 cases per 1000 patient-years (PY) in the overall population to 7–8/1000 PY in those aged 50 years or older, and 10/1000 PY in those at least 80 years of age [12]. Recent prospective studies in Italy and Germany have reported incidence rates of 6.5/1000 PY and 6.7/1000 PY respectively in persons aged 50 years or older [13, 14]. In most European populations, incidence is higher in women and far higher greater in the immunocompromised [15]. The proportion of those patients with HZ who develop PHN in recent studies from Italy, Germany, and the UK ranges between 10% and 12% [13–15]. Data from Spain is similar; large retrospective studies have reported incidence rates of 5.0/1000 PY in adults aged 18 years or older [16], and 7.2/1000 PY in those aged 50 years or older [17]. Similar to other countries, higher incidence is reported in women and in the immunocompromised, and in patients with specific comorbidities such as COPD [16–18]. PHN is estimated to develop in between 12% and 16% of patients [19, 20].

In Spain, data on the impact of HZ and complications such as PHN on HRQL and healthcare costs are limited, and studies are mainly retrospective in approach [16, 20–23]. As such additional data are of value to provide a better understanding of the impact of these aspects in Spain. Here we report results from a prospective study that evaluates the impact of HZ and PHN on patients’ HRQL, healthcare resource utilization, and associated economic costs.

Methods

This was a prospective observational cohort study of patients presenting in primary care conducted between March 2012 and May 2015 (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT01521286). The final study report was completed in July 2017. Participating physicians were community physicians/general practitioners (GPs) belonging to one of four GP networks situated in the Madrid, Catalonia, and Valencia regions covering an estimated 96,300-person cohort aged 50 years or older.

Eligible participants were adults aged 50 years or older presenting in their GP’s practice with acute HZ, defined as new unilateral pain (broadly defined to include allodynia and pruritus) accompanied by unilateral rash and no alternative diagnosis. Patients attending a secondary GP consultation within 7 days following a HZ diagnosis in another setting (e.g., emergency room/urgent care center) were also eligible. Subjects meeting these criteria were assessed by participating GPs on the basis of their ability to complete several study questionnaires and, if considered suitable, were enrolled after providing written informed consent.

Data Collection and Patient Follow-Up

For all patients, a case report form with demographic data, medical history, and clinical HZ information was completed by the GP during the initial visit, along with information obtained from any referring healthcare personnel providing care related to the HZ episode. Data for subsequent study time points were collected via study questionnaires or recorded by GPs on subsequent visits. Healthcare resource utilization data were also entered into case report forms at the initial visit. Patients were asked to record details of all subsequent healthcare resource utilization throughout the study.

All patients were to be followed up until assessment on day 90 after the initial visit, which corresponded to the first time the patient presented at the study site (and does not necessarily correspond to the date of HZ rash onset; day 0) (see Supplementary information and Table S1 in the electronic supplementary material for details).

Data on the severity of HZ pain and impact upon activities of daily living (ADL) and HRQL were collected through questionnaires as reported in similar previous studies in patients with HZ from international studies and in those conducted in Germany, Italy, and Japan [24–27] which used the validated Zoster Brief Pain Inventory (ZBPI) and the EuroQoL-5 Dimension (EQ-5D) questionnaires [4, 7, 28, 29]. For assessment of subsequent pain, clinically relevant PHN was defined as the presence of HZ-associated moderate or severe “worst pain” score ≥ 3 on the ZBPI scale index persisting or appearing more than 90 days after onset of the rash [25–27, 30].

Patients completed both questionnaires at the initial visit/day 0 and at assigned days; all patients were followed up until day 90, with questionnaires administered at days 15, 30, 60, and 90. For the ZBPI questionnaire, reminders were sent to patients to prompt completion at relevant time points and return to the study centers (by mail/in person) until the end of follow-up. For HRQL, follow-up assessment using EQ-5D was carried out via telephone interview conducted by trained research personnel using scripted questions replicating the survey text [31, 32]. Patients without PHN completed the study at day 90. Patients with PHN were followed up till day 180 and those with PHN at day 180 were followed up until day 270.

Pain and HRQL Assessments

HZ-related pain was assessed using item 3 of the ZBPI questionnaire which asks patients to rate the “worst”, “least”, and “average” pain experienced over the previous 24 h. HZ impact on ADL was also recorded using the ZBPI questionnaire as previously described [25, 26] (Supplementary information). The EQ-5D questionnaire was used to measure HRQL utility. A single summary weighted health utility index value was calculated using country-specific published preference weights (time trade-off, TTO) values as previously described [26]. Spanish TTO EQ-5D value sets were used to generate the utility score [33]; using these weights, the “worst imaginable health state” has a utility index of − 0.654, while 1.000 represents the “best imaginable health state”.

Healthcare Resource Utilization and Medical Costs

Reported costs are as incurred in real time between March 2012 and May 2015. Unit costs for resources were taken from official sources as reported for 2014 [34] (Table S2 in the electronic supplementary material). Medication costs (inclusive of applicable taxes) were based on prices published by the Official General Council of the College of Pharmacists of Spain [35]. No cost updating was performed.

Costs were estimated from both a healthcare system (HCS) perspective, which assessed direct medical costs, and from the societal perspective, which included both direct medical costs and indirect costs incurred by the patient (or their caregiver). Direct medical costs included all GP and specialist medical visits, hospital admissions and outpatient visits, and costs of medical procedures, investigations, and medications. As the study was conducted within a primary care setting, some hospitalizations and all specialist visits were only reported as referrals. As such no details of length of hospital stay were recorded, and a mean length of stay of 9 days was assumed; this could be considered a conservative estimate, as previous Spanish data has reported an average length of hospitalization for HZ of 12.9 days [36]. The daily cost of inpatient hospital stay was €325 [34] (Table S2 in the electronic supplementary material). Indirect costs included all expenditures incurred by patients, including productivity losses due to lost working days (for those patients in active employment), and out-of-pocket expenses (including any medical co-payments); productivity loss by caregivers were also included (Supplementary information).

Data Analysis

Descriptive statistics (mean values, standard deviation [SD] or standard error [SEs] and percentages) are presented for patient demographics, ZBPI pain severity scores, and for healthcare resource utilization outcomes and costs. Data were analyzed for the overall study cohort (all patients with HZ), by age strata, and also categorized on the basis of complications, with minor differences in categorization used in the HRQL and economic analyses (see the appendix in the electronic supplementary material). All analyses were carried out using SAS software version 9.2.

Compliance with Ethics Guidelines

This study was conducted in accordance with the ethical principles originating in the Declaration of Helsinki, the principles of Good Clinical Practice, and all applicable regulatory requirements. Written informed consent was obtained from each enrolled participant prior to any study data collection. The study protocol, the informed consent form, and other information that required pre-approval were reviewed and approved by the investigational center independent ethics committee (IEC) or institutional review board (IRB) for each of the participating primary care networks. These committees were the following: Comité Ético de Investigación Clínica Corporativo de Atención Primaria de la Comunitat Valenciana, Comité Ético de Investigación Clínica de la FUNDACIÓ UNIO CATALANA HOSPITALS, and Comité Ético de Investigación Clínica del Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal. The study protocol was posted on GSK’s Clinical Study Register (www.gsk-clinicalstudyregister.com GSK Study ID 114617) and on the US National Library of Medicine NIH website www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT01521286).

Results

Patient Demographics

A total of 545 patients with HZ were enrolled across the four GP networks and included in the HRQL and economic analyses: Madrid (n = 229), Catalonia (n = 146), Publica Valencia (n = 93), and Pau Valencia (n = 77). The mean (SD) age was 66.9 (9.7) years (range 50–91 years); 57.2% were women. A total of 324 patients (59.4%) were retired, 122 (22.4%) were employed/self-employed, and 34 (6.2%) unemployed; 65 patients (11.9%) stated “other” as their employment status (35 of whom were at least 65 years of age) (Table 1).

Table 1.

Patient demographics in the overall cohort

	50–59 YOA (N = 137)		60–64 YOA (N = 90)		65–69 YOA (N = 100)		70–79 YOA (N = 158)		≥ 80 YOA (N = 60)		Overall  ≥ 50 YOA (N = 545)
	n	%	n	%	n	%	n	%	n	%	n	%
Gender
Male	59	43.1	38	42.2	47	47.0	69	43.7	20	33.3	233	42.8
Female	78	56.9	52	57.8	53	53.0	89	56.3	40	66.7	312	57.2
Employment
Employed	87	63.5	34	37.8	1	1.0	–	–	–	–	122	22.4
Unemployed	20	14.6	12	13.3	–	–	–	–	2	3.3	34	6.2
Retired	12	8.8	32	35.6	87	87.0	137	86.7	56	93.3	324	59.4
Other (unpaid)	18	13.1	12	13.3	12	12.0	21	13.3	2	3.3	65	11.9
Age
Mean	54.6		61.8		66.9		74.2		83.5		66.9
SD	2.65		1.44		1.42		2.92		2.78		9.68
Median	55		62		67		74		83		67
Range	50–59		60–64		65–69		70–79		80–91		50–91

n total number in each age group, n/% number/percentage in each category, SD standard deviation, YOA years of age

Of these 545 patients with HZ, 470 (86.2%) had no HZ complications occurring within the first 90 days of the study, and 25 patients (4.6%) developed PHN during the study period (and were followed up beyond day 90). A further 50 patients (9.2%) had one or more HZ-related complications (excluding PHN) occurring within the first 90 days of the study: chiefly cutaneous complications (including bacterial superinfection and disseminated varicella-zoster virus) and neurological (mainly peripheral nerve palsies; no cases of zoster-associated meningoencephalitis were reported) and ocular or ophthalmic complications (chiefly keratitis). No visceral complications were reported.

Questionnaire Compliance

The proportion of patients completing the ZBPI and EQ-5D questionnaires varied across specific time points. ZBPI questionnaires were available for 291/545 patients (53.4%) at day 0, for 240/545 patients (44.0%) at day 30, and for 209/545 patients (38.3%) at day 90. Subsequently, of the 25 patients with PHN, compliance was 16.0% (4/25) at day 180 and 21.4% (3/14) at day 270. Compliance was the highest in those aged 80 years or more (Supplementary Fig. 1). Compliance was greater for the EQ-5D questionnaire. At day 0, EQ-5D questionnaires were available for 307/545 patients (56.3%) and compliance increased during study follow-up: 83.3% (454/545) at day 30 and 80.9% (441/545) at day 90, with some decline thereafter.

HRQL Analysis Based on ZBPI Instrument

At day 0, 261/286 patients with an available ZBPI worst pain score (91.3%) reported any pain while 229/286 (80.1%) reported moderate/severe pain (worst pain score ≥ 3) and 132/286 (46.2%) reported severe pain (worst pain score ≥ 7). The mean (SD) worst pain score at day 0 for the overall cohort was 5.50 (2.96). Patients who developed PHN had a higher mean (SD) worst pain score at day 0 than those who did not develop PHN: 6.90 (1.67) versus 5.40 (3.02). At day 90, the mean (SD) worst pain scores for the overall cohort and in those who did not develop PHN were 0.60 (1.75) and 0.0 (0.37), respectively; in patients with PHN, at day 90, the mean (SD) worst pain score was 5.50 (1.93) (Fig. 1). In the overall study cohort, the mean worst pain scores appeared to diminish more slowly in the older age groups (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1.

ZBPI worst pain score over time until day 90 by PHN status and by age. n number of subjects, PHN postherpetic neuralgia, YOA years of age, ZBPI Zoster Brief Pain Inventory

Mean and least-square (LS) mean ZBPI ADL scores for the overall HZ patient cohort are detailed in Table S3 in the electronic supplementary material. The estimated LS mean (SE) for pain interference with ADLs was approximately 2.91 (0.16) at day 0 and decreased steadily during the study period to 0.55 (0.10) at day 90 (Table S3). Sleep was the item most affected by the HZ episode throughout the 90-day study period with a mean (SD) score of 4.30 (3.63) at day 0, although the impact on sleep subsequently declined (Fig. 2). At day 0, 203/283 patients (71.7%) with an available ZBPI sleep score reported any interference with sleep (score ≥ 1) and 100/283 (35.3%) reported severe interference (score ≥ 7). Other items with a mean score of ≥ 3 at day 0 were mood, enjoyment of life, and general activity (Fig. 2).

Fig. 2.

Mean Zoster Brief Pain Inventory (ZBPI) interference with activities of daily living (ADL) over the first 90 days after rash onset

Fig. 3.

Mean EQ-5D utility scores over time by PHN status. EQ-5D EuroQoL-5 Dimension questionnaire, n number of subjects, PHN postherpetic neuralgia

HRQL Analysis Using EQ-5D

Mean EQ-5D utility scores were available for 299/545 patients (54.9%) at day 0, 453/545 patients (83.1%) at day 30, and 441/545 patients (80.9%) at day 90. Estimated mean EQ-5D utility scores over the study period for the overall cohort, and for those patients with HZ without PHN and for those with PHN are shown in Fig. 3 and detailed in Table S4 in the electronic supplementary material. Mean EQ-5D utility scores in patients who developed PHN were lower by approximately 0.2 than the corresponding mean score for patients with HZ without PHN at each time point from day 0 to day 90 (Fig. 3 and Table S4 in the electronic supplementary material).

Estimated LS mean (SE) EQ-5D utility scores for the overall cohort and for patients with HZ without PHN are shown in Table 2. The LS mean (SE) utility score for the overall HZ patient cohort increased from 0.661 (0.018) at day 0 to 0.876 (0.010) at day 90, with an estimated mean (SE) over the first month after HZ onset of 0.738 (0.012) (Table 2). If it is assumed that the day 90 scores may reflect or act as a proxy for the normal baseline EQ-5D utility score for patients prior to the HZ episode (an approach used in similar studies from Germany and Italy [25, 26]), then an overall utility loss (or disutility) during the first month of the HZ episode can be estimated. For the overall HZ patient cohort, the estimated disutility was 0.138 in the first 30 days of the HZ episode. Disutility was the greatest in patients aged 70–79 years, with a mean disutility of 0.186 in the first month. A similar pattern in LS mean (SE) utility scores across the study period was observed in those patients with HZ who did not develop PHN, with similar estimations for disutility (0.137) in the first 30 days of the HZ episode (Table 2).

Table 2.

Estimated EQ-5D least-squares mean utility scores over time by age group

	50–59 YOA N = 137			60–64 YOA N = 90			65–69 YOA N = 100				70–79 YOA N = 158			≥ 80 YOA N = 60			Overall  ≥ 50 YOA N = 545
	n	Mean	SE	n	Mean	SE	n	Mean		SE	N	Mean	SE	n	Mean	SE	n	Mean	SE
All patients with HZ (n = 545)
Day 0	69	0.670	0.037	52	0.706	0.043	48	0.700		0.044	91	0.671	0.032	39	0.494	0.050	299	0.661	0.018
Day 15	49	0.814	0.036	40	0.728	0.041	47	0.795		0.038	69	0.689	0.031	25	0.638	0.052	230	0.740	0.017
Day 30	108	0.875	0.023	81	0.835	0.027	86	0.851		0.026	131	0.759	0.021	47	0.694	0.036	453	0.811	0.012
Day 60	114	0.921	0.021	78	0.892	0.025	90	0.898		0.024	141	0.831	0.019	48	0.709	0.032	471	0.864	0.011
Day 90	107	0.914	0.021	73	0.855	0.025	81	0.889		0.024	132	0.892	0.019	48	0.752	0.031	441	0.876	0.010
Day 0–30a		0.787	0.023		0.756	0.027		0.782		0.027		0.706	0.021		0.609	0.034		0.738	0.012
Disutility (day 0–30)b		0.127			0.099			0.107				0.186			0.143			0.138
QALY loss (day 0–30)c		0.010			0.008			0.009				0.015			0.012			0.011
Patients without PHN (n = 520)
Day 0	66	0.677	0.038	48	0.708	0.044	45	0.726		0.045	86	0.671	0.033	33	0.512	0.054	278	0.671	0.019
Day 15	49	0.817	0.035	36	0.767	0.042	45	0.802		0.038	64	0.716	0.031	22	0.642	0.054	216	0.759	0.017
Day 30	105	0.876	0.023	77	0.859	0.027	83	0.859		0.026	126	0.764	0.021	41	0.729	0.037	432	0.823	0.012
Day 60	111	0.924	0.021	72	0.901	0.026	87	0.905		0.024	136	0.838	0.019	42	0.714	0.034	448	0.871	0.011
Day 90	105	0.917	0.020	67	0.872	0.025	77	0.903		0.023	127	0.899	0.018	42	0.771	0.032	418	0.888	0.010
Day 0–30a		0.790	0.023		0.778	0.028		0.796		0.027		0.717	0.021		0.627	0.036		0.751	0.012
Disutility (day 0–30)b		0.127			0.094			0.107				0.182			0.144			0.137
QALY loss (day 0–30)c		0.010			0.008			0.009				0.015			0.012			0.011

EQ-5D EuroQoL-5 Dimension questionnaire, HZ herpes zoster, N total number of patients in each age group, n number of patients with evaluable questionnaires, PHN postherpetic neuralgia, QALY quality-adjusted life-year, SE standard error, YOA years of age

^aDay 0–30 is the estimated least-squares (LS) mean utility score averaged over days 0–30

^bDisutility is calculated using the estimated LS mean values at day 90 as the normal or baseline utility score and using the difference between this and the LS mean utility score averaged over days 0–30

^cQALY loss calculated as disutility value multiplied by (length of period in days)/(number of days in year), i.e., 30/365

Healthcare Resource Utilization and Costs

Healthcare resource utilization information was available for all 545 participants. Eleven patients (2.0%) were hospitalized, and five patients (0.9%) had a total of seven emergency room visits. For 30 patients (5.5%), a total of 51 specialist visits were recorded, which included five patients with a total of seven emergency room visits; three patients required a total of 22 nursing visits, and nine patients visited an ophthalmologist (each for a single consultation).

A total of 938 outpatient GP visits were reported; a mean of approximately 1.7 visits per HZ episode for the overall cohort; 545 occurred at the initial visit, then 369 visits involving 173 patients between day 0 and day 90, and 24 visits involving 11 patients (all with PHN) between day 90 and day 270. A total of 16 patients had lost work days, corresponding to 3% of all patients and 13.1% of patients in employment; with a mean work loss of 9.9 days (median 6.5) during their HZ episode. The caregivers of eight patients lost an average of 1.3 paid workdays (median 1.0). The mean costs of these productivity work losses from a societal perspective were €66.3 per patient aged 50–59 years and €84.2 per patient aged 60–64 years. The indirect costs from a societal perspective associated with these work losses averaged across the total cohort were €30.5 per patient.

Systemic antivirals were prescribed for 85% of the patients; most frequently valaciclovir (28.4%), brivudine (27.0%), and acyclovir (24.4%). Analgesics were prescribed for 55% of patients, with pregabalin being prescribed for 8.3% of patients (Table S5 in the electronic supplementary material).

The mean (SD) costs per HZ episode in the overall cohort (n = 545) were €240 (€466; range €63–4084) from the HCS payer perspective and €296 (€535; range €63–4289) from the societal perspective (Table 3 and Fig. 4). Costs were the highest in the 70–79 years age group and were higher for women than for men from both perspectives (Table S6 in the electronic supplementary material). GP visits made up 45% of the direct medical costs per HZ episode, with medication and hospitalization costs each accounting for 25% of direct medical costs from the HCS perspective. The relative contribution of these costs and also of those indirect costs associated with productivity loss to total costs of HZ from the societal perspective in our overall HZ cohort are shown in Fig. 4.

Table 3.

Direct medical costs (€) by component and total costs by complication category according to analytic perspective

Perspective	50–59 YOA N = 137		60–64 YOA N = 90		65–69 YOA N = 100		70–79 YOA N = 158		≥ 80 YOA N = 60		Overall  ≥ 50 YOA N = 545
	n	Mean (SD)	n	Mean (SD)	n	Mean (SD)	n	Mean (SD)	n	Mean (SD)	n	Mean (SD)
Direct medical costs
GP visits
HCS/societal	137	83.8 (41.1)	90	105.2 (73.9)	100	103.5 (118.7)	158	119.8 (127.1)	60	143.2 (131.2)	545	107.9 (103.7)
Range		63–251		63–376		63–1006		63–878		63–627		63–1066
Medications
HCS	134	38.3 (23.2)	88	53.6 (33.3)	100	67.3 (39.3)	153	72.8 (52.1)	57	82.5 (54.1)	532	60.9 (43.9)
Range		152–304		0–161		2–176		0–277		0–238		0–277
Societal	134	77.1 (45.2)	88	88.6 (49.9)	100	83.7 (45.1)	153	92.2 (61.9)	57	101.1 (58.9)	532	87.2 (53.1)
Range		2–244		2–377		2–196		1–409		2–287		1–409
Procedures/lab tests
HCS/societal	12	52.4 (32.1)	1	64.2 (–)	3	66.9 (55.4)	13	48.4 (39.0)	3	51.4 (33.9)	32	52.4 (35.5)
Range		13–128		–		13–124		13–150		13–77		13–150
Specialist visits
HCS/societal	7	173.5 (57.4)	3	202.5 (87.7)	3	252.6 (174.5)	7	152.0 (118.5)	6	365.0 (253.9)	26	224.4 (164.9)
Range		152–304		152–304		152–454		12–388		152–822		12–822
Hospital admissions
HCS/societal	1	2925 (–)	1	2925 (–)	1	2925 (–)	7	2925 (–)	1	2925 (–)	11	2925 (–)
Range		–		–		–		–		–		–
Overall meana
HCS	137	156.0 (259.7)	90	197.6 (319.7)	100	209.6 (402.3)	158	330.6 (663.5)	60	309.3 (453.3)	545	240.2 (466.4)
Range		63–3047		63–3053		63–3818		63–4084		63–3073		63–4084
Societal	137	193.9 (264.7)	90	231.8 (326.9)	100	226.0 (405.5)	158	349.5 (670.0)	60	327.0 (457.3)	545	265.8 (470.5)
Range		63–3106		63–3119		65–3837		63–4289		63–3083		63–4289
Total costs by complication categorya,b
HZ without PHN or any other complication
HCS	127	131 (69)	76	185 (342)	88	168 (178)	130	237 (471)	49	237 (426)	470	187 (328)
Range		63–423		63–3053		64–1708		63–3219		63–3073		63–3219
Societal	127	239 (390)	76	283 (512)	88	184 (186)	130	255 (470)	49	251 (425)	470	242 (412)
Range		63–4046		63–3433		65–1772		63–3228		63–3083		63–4046
With PHN
HCS	3	99 (18)	6	310 (191)	4	1124 (1798)	6	750 (1233)	6	519 (464)	25	571 (937)
Range		87–120		66–538		168–3818		110–3229		108–1211		66–3818
Societal	3	172 (99)	6	797 (1159)	4	1137 (1802)	6	766 (1240)	6	562 (498)	25	712 (1065)
Range		111–287		66–3116		180–3837		116–3255		113–1355		66–3837
HZ with complications (excluding PHN)
HCS	7	635 (1070)	8	232 (82)	8	210 (89)	22	769 (1123)	5	770 (439)	50	575 (872)
Range		87–3047		142–338		79–308		63–4084		474–1525		63–4084
Societal	7	678 (1078)	8	265 (95)	8	235 (87)	22	794 (1149)	5	786 (437)	50	603 (887)
Range		111–3106		158–399		81–321		78–4289		494–1540		78–4289
All patients with HZ
HCS	137	156 (260)	90	198 (320)	100	210 (402)	158	331 (663)	60	309 (453)	545	240 (466)
Range		63–3047		63–3053		64–3818		63–4084		63–3073		63–4084
Societal	137	260 (449)	90	316 (560)	100	226 (405)	158	349 (670)	158	327 (457)	545	296 (535)
Range		63–4046		63–3433		65–3837		63–4289		63–3083		63–4289

GP general practitioner, HCS healthcare system, HZ herpes zoster, mean mean cost in € averaging only over the patients generating this cost component, n number of patients generating this cost component, N number of patients enrolled in this age group, PHN postherpetic neuralgia, YOA years of age

^aThe mean cost in € by averaging each cost component over all 545 patients and adding over all the cost components

^bIndirect costs include productivity loss due to work absence for patients still working and caregiver productivity loss averaged over all patients in the relevant category to estimate the average total societal cost for each HZ category

Fig. 4.

Mean costs by payer perspective and complication category (a) and distribution of direct medical costs per herpes zoster episode from the HCS perspective (b) and medical costs and indirect costs from the societal perspective (c). HCS healthcare system, HZ herpes zoster, GP general practitioner, n number of patients, PHN postherpetic neuralgia

For patients without any HZ-related complications the mean (SD) costs were €187 (€328; range €63–3219) from the HCS payer perspective and €242 (€412; range €63–4046) from the societal perspective. For patients with PHN the mean (SD) costs from the payer perspective amounted to €571 (€937; range €66–3818) and €712 (€1065; range €66–3837) from the societal perspective. For those patients with complications other than PHN the mean (SD) costs were €575 (€872; range €63–4084) and €603 (€887; range €78–4289) from the payer/societal perspectives, respectively (Table 3 and Fig. 4a). For these patients with non-PHN complications, the mean (SD) costs for those with cutaneous complications were €576 (€823; range €76–3120) from the payer perspective and €607 (€822; range €78–3134) from the societal perspective. For those with ophthalmic complications, the mean (SD) costs were €1107 (€1164; range €63–3047) and €1142 (€1171; range €120–3106) from the HCS payer/societal perspectives, respectively; and for neurologic complications (a single patient) €4084 from a payer perspective and €4289 from a societal perspective (Table S7 in the electronic supplementary material).

Discussion

We found that pain associated with the initial HZ episode had a clear impact on the patients’ HRQL and interference in ADLs; at day 0, 80.1% of patients had moderate or severe HZ “worst” pain and 46.2% had severe “worst” pain. Acute HZ pain had an impact on the patients’ ADLs, in particular sleep disturbance with 35.3% of patients reporting severe interference on sleep score at day 0 (Fig. 2). For most patients, interference with ADL reduced within 30 days after HZ rash onset, with mean scores between 1 and 2 for all the ZBPI ADL items at this time point. EQ-5D scores were also impacted in the acute HZ phase, with a mean disutility of 0.138 in the first 30 days of the HZ episode in the overall HZ patient cohort, which represents a quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) loss of 0.011 in the first month (and with greater disutility and QALY loss in older patients) (Table 2).

In our cohort, 25 patients (4.6%) developed PHN, and mean ZBPI “worst” pain scores at day 0 in patients who developed PHN were higher than in those who did not (6.9 and 5.4, respectively) and remained above 5.0 during the first 90 days, whereas “worst” pain scores fell below 2.0 after 1 month in patients with HZ without subsequent PHN (Fig. 1). HRQL was also lower in patients who developed PHN, with EQ-5D utility scores at day 0 around 0.2 lower than in patients without PHN, with this difference maintained over the entire 90-day follow-up period (patients without PHN were not followed beyond day 90) (Fig. 3).

Our estimate of 4.6% of patients with HZ developing PHN is lower than that reported in other studies from Spain. An extensive retrospective analysis of primary care records evaluating the risk of HZ in patients aged 50 years or older in the Valencia region reported that 13,658 out of 87,086 patients with HZ (15.7%) developed PHN [19]. In Catalonia, PHN has been reported to occur in 12.3% of patients with HZ aged 50–59 years and in 17.5% in those aged 70 years or older [20]. In our study, the proportion was based on the total number of patients in the overall study cohort (N = 545) rather than the number of patients with an actual pain assessment after day 90 (N = 212). If we limit our estimate to those patients with an assessment on or after day 90, the percentage of patients at least 50 years old with HZ who developed PHN increases to 11.8% which is more in keeping with these previous data from Spain.

Questionnaire compliance (in terms of response rates for completed questionnaires) in this study was lower than observed for other studies which used a similar approach to evaluating HZ impact on HRQL [25, 26]. We had available ZBPI and EQ-5D scores for only around 50% of our cohort at initial assessment, and so our observations on pain and interference in ADLs and impact on HRQL may not be wholly representative of the overall study population. The differential response rate between ZBPI and EQ-5D at subsequent study time points is also unusual; however, one explanation for the greater compliance with the EQ-5D questionnaire may be that this was due to telephone administration [37]. We are uncertain as to the impact of low compliance rates on our overall cohort’s HRQL outcomes and the nature of any potential sampling bias associated with this; our findings on HZ impact on HRQL should be considered in light of these limitations. Nevertheless, our HRQL results are consistent with those of previous studies that used the same ZBPI and EQ-5D instruments for assessing the impact of HZ and PHN on HRQL [5, 8, 9, 27, 38, 39]. Although HRQL data in Spanish patients with HZ are scarce, a recent Italian study using similar methodology reported comparable impact of HZ-related pain on ADLs and EQ-5D scores, with similar disutility during the first month following rash onset, and with the greatest impact observed in those patients subsequently developing PHN [26]. This would suggest that missing data may be missing completely at random.

Looking at healthcare resource use within our cohort, the mean number of primary care visits per patient due to the HZ episode was 1.7 visits, somewhat lower than that reported by Cebrián-Cuenca et al. in a previous study from Spain which also prospectively evaluated resource use and allied costs of HZ and PHN treated in primary care in Valencia (which reported an average of 2.4 GP visits) [21], while a later retrospective study from Valencia by Muñoz-Quiles et al. reported data indicating an average of 2.0 cases per patient [19]. The mean number of additional specialist or nursing consultations or emergency room visits (0.09 per patient) is also lower than that reported by Cebrián-Cuenca et al. (where a mean number of 0.29 specialist visits per patient and a further 0.31 nursing or other professional visits per patient were reported) [21]. The proportion of our cohort hospitalized (2.0%) is similar to that reported by Salleras et al. (1.5%) in a previous Spanish study [20], although others report lower rates: 1.2% in the extensive retrospective analysis from Valencia [19], whereas in the cohort reported by Cebrián-Cuenca et al., none of the 130 patients were hospitalized for HZ [21]. The proportion of our study cohort receiving systemic antivirals (95%) is broadly comparable to that reported by Cebrián-Cuenca et al. in their cohort (91%) [21].

Our analysis of the costs of HZ and related complications confirms that HZ presents a substantial economic burden. Note that unlike the HRQL aspect of the study, cost data was recorded by GPs at the initial visit or on subsequent visits, supplemented with data from additional medical providers when relevant and entered into case report forms throughout the study, and so was not dependent on ZBPI and EQ-5D questionnaire completion. We found a mean direct medical cost per patient of €240 from the HCS payer perspective and €266 from a societal perspective, and overall disease costs of €240 from the HCS payer perspective and €296 from a societal perspective. Costs were dependent upon development of complications: the lowest in uncomplicated HZ, greater in patients who developed PHN, and the highest in those with other non-PHN complications (Fig. 4).

Although one should be cautious about making cost comparisons, our costs were lower than those previously reported from Spain. In their study, Cebrián-Cuenca and colleagues estimated total costs per HZ episode (which excluded hospitalizations) of €309 and €378 from the payer and societal perspectives, respectively [21]. In that study, costs also varied depending on PHN status, with mean costs per patient of €821 in those with PHN compared with €307 in those without PHN [21]. In a retrospective study from Catalonia, Salleras and colleagues estimated the direct healthcare costs for patients with HZ presenting in the dermatology outpatient unit of a hospital, where the mean direct medical cost per patient was €302 in cases of HZ that did not evolve to PHN and €917 for those who subsequently PHN [20]. Another primary care retrospective study from Catalonia reported overall (direct and indirect) costs of €1827 for patients with PHN and €457 for patients with uncomplicated HZ [22]. In all these studies, costs were greater in older patients.

Our study was not designed to monitor the evolution of HZ costs over specific time periods, which may be considered a limitation. However, the great majority of resources used and estimated costs we report were incurred within the first 90 days (as only those patients with PHN we followed beyond this point). Furthermore, much of the resource use and allied medical costs relate to services provided the acute HZ episode (initial GP visit, antiviral medication treatment, HZ hospitalization, etc.), and would have been incurred within the first 30 days, although it may be expected that patients with complications and with persistent HZ-associated pain would continue to incur further cumulative costs. This would be consistent with other data. For example, in their resource use and cost analysis, the majority of the primary care services and allied costs reported by Cebrián-Cuenca et al. were incurred within the first month [21].

From these studies, and as seen in the present study, it seems clear that HZ carries a significant economic burden and that direct medical costs are greater in older patients, with a common finding that PHN development substantially increases direct and societal HZ costs. However, as reported elsewhere, when considering the overall cost of disease at a population level, the overall cost is higher for patients with uncomplicated HZ, primarily a result of the higher incidence rates of uncomplicated HZ [10].

The study has certain limitations relating to the cost analysis. This study was carried out in a GP setting with data on resource utilization derived from GPs’ own clinical records and from external sources (i.e., information provided by patients or from external clinical institutions and physicians); additional visits to other specialists, prescribed medications, and hospitalizations may have occurred without being reported to the study GP and so not recorded in the database. Our results should be considered in the context of such uncertainty (which on balance may be an underestimation of actual costs). Study strengths include its prospective design which evaluated a relatively large cohort of patients with HZ presenting in primary care.

Conclusion

In Spain, HZ and HZ-related complications such as PHN are associated with impacted HRQL for patients at least 50 years old and represent a substantial economic burden for payers (HCS) and at a societal level.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.