Skip to main content
PLOS One logoLink to PLOS One
. 2021 Jun 10;16(6):e0253079. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0253079

Skeletal muscle loss and body composition in progressive supranuclear palsy: A retrospective cross-sectional study

Yasuyuki Takamatsu 1, Ikuko Aiba 2,*
Editor: Ezio Lanza3
PMCID: PMC8192011  PMID: 34111224

Abstract

Introduction

Skeletal muscle mass loss has been associated with decreased physical performance; however, the body composition characteristics in progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP) are not well understood. We investigated body composition parameters, focusing on skeletal muscle mass, in patients with PSP and compared them with those of healthy older adults.

Methods

This retrospective cross-sectional study included 39 patients with PSP and 30 healthy older adults (control group). Using a multi-frequency bioelectrical impedance analysis, we measured the skeletal mass index (SMI), basal metabolism, extracellular water/total body water ratio (ECW/TBW), and body fat percentage and examined the relationship between SMI and age, body mass index (BMI) and other body composition parameters.

Results

The PSP group had a higher rate of low muscle mass (56.4%) than the control group (10.0%), although the ages and BMIs were similar. The leg SMI was lower for the PSP group, while the ECW/TBW was higher for the PSP group. The basal metabolism was lower for the PSP group than for the controls but only in the women. The basal metabolism and BMI showed a significant correlation with SMI in the PSP group. There was a significant correlation between SMI and age, ECW/TBW, and body fat percentage in the PSP group but only in the women.

Conclusion

This study is the first to show that a high proportion of patients with PSP have low muscle mass. We showed differences in terms of sex in muscle mass loss in women with PSP, which was associated with inactivity and aging.

Introduction

Age-related loss of skeletal muscle mass and reduced muscle strength are collectively known as sarcopenia. In 2010, the European Working Group on Sarcopenia in Older People (EWGSOP) published a definition of sarcopenia that has been widely employed by clinicians and researchers [1]. Sarcopenia has been associated with motor functional disability, lower quality of life (QOL), and mortality [24]. In addition to aging, other factors related to the development of sarcopenia include immobility, malnutrition, and chronic disease [1]. Sarcopenia has also been reported in Parkinson’s disease [5,6].

Progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP) is a neurodegenerative disorder that is considered an atypical parkinsonian syndrome [7,8]. PSP progresses faster than Parkinson’s disease, and the clinical treatment for PSP has not been well-established, unlike Parkinson’s disease. Patients with PSP exhibit supranuclear gaze palsy, falls, postural instability, gait disturbance, and cognitive impairment [7,8] and tend to be older. Their loss of physical function might therefore be due to both disease-related and age-related sarcopenia. Loss of skeletal muscle mass has been associated with a decline in physical performance and activities of daily living (ADL) [9]. However, no studies have examined body composition and skeletal muscle mass in PSP. We therefore investigated the body composition, with a focus on skeletal muscle mass, of patients with PSP compared with that of healthy older adults.

Methods

Participants

We conducted a retrospective cross-sectional study at the National Hospital Organization Higashinagoya National Hospital in Nagoya, Japan, between June 2017 and August 2020, which included patients with probable or possible PSP according to the 2017 Movement Disorder Society Criteria for the Clinical Diagnosis of PSP [8,10]. For comparison, we also enrolled age-matched neurologically healthy community-dwelling older adults into a control group. The PSP group consisted of inpatients hospitalized for rehabilitation or respite care, as well as outpatients. The exclusion criteria were as follows: 1) under 60 years of age, 2) requiring more than minor help with ADL, 3) a modified Rankin scale (mRS) [11] score ≥ 5, and 4) the inability to measure one’s own body composition. The study was conducted in accordance with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki and was approved by the Ethics Committee of the National Hospital Organization Higashinagoya National Hospital (approval number: 28–13, 30–11). The healthy older adults provided their written informed consent after receiving a verbal explanation of the study. The patients’ informed consent was obtained in the form of an opt-out on the website.

Assessments

The age, sex, height, weight, and body mass index (BMI) of all participants were recorded. We measured their skeletal muscle mass, basal metabolism, body fat percentage (BFP), and extracellular water to total body water ratio (ECW/TBW) with the InBody S10 body composition analyzer (InBody Japan, Inc., Tokyo, Japan), which employs a multi-frequency bioelectrical impedance analysis [1214]. We calculated the skeletal muscle mass index (SMI) as follows: [appendicular skeletal muscle mass (kg)]/[height (m)]2. Based on the Asian Working Group on Sarcopenia (AWGS) criteria for sarcopenia in older people [15], we defined low muscle mass as an SMI < 7.0 kg/m2 in men and <5.7 kg/m2 in women and investigated the number and proportion in each group for the main endpoint. Based on the World Health Organization’s body fat thresholds for diagnosing obesity as recommended by the American Association of Clinical Endocrinology [16], we defined obesity as a BFP >25% for men and >35% for women. We recorded the disease duration, mRS score, and Barthel index (BI) for the patients with PSP. All assessments of the inpatients with PSP were performed in the first few days after hospital admission to exclude the effects of treatment and rehabilitation.

Statistical analysis

We performed the statistical analysis using SPSS software, version 26 (IBM, Inc., Armonk, NY, USA), which excluded missing values. All statistical comparisons were performed by sex, analyzing the number of male and female participants with low muscle mass (sex-specific SMI below the AWGS criteria) and obesity (sex-specific BFP above the WHO criteria). We performed Fisher’s exact method to analyze the participants by low muscle mass, obesity, and sex, and calculated the effect size (|φ|). For the other assessments, we applied Mann-Whitney U test and calculated the effect size (|r| = Z/√n). We employed Spearman’s rank-correlation coefficient to investigate the relationship between SMI and the other parameters in each group. A p-value < 0.05 was considered significant.

Results

Study patients

The study included 39 patients with PSP and 30 control participants, with no significant differences between the groups in terms of age (Table 1).

Table 1. Participants’ demographic and clinical characteristics.

Total Female Male
Controls PSP Controls PSP Controls PSP
N 30 39 p Effect size 13 15 p Effect size 17 24 p Effect size
Age, years a 71.8 ± 6.3 73.8 ± 6 71.2 ± 7.8 72.1 ± 5.9 0.683 0.08 d 72.2 ± 5 74.9 ± 5.9 0.151 0.22 d
SMI, kg/m2 a 7.3 ± 0.7 6.4 ± 1.1 6.9 ± 0.5 5.5 ± 1.0 <0.001** 0.70 d 7.6 ± 0.7 7.0 ± 0.8 0.010* 0.41 d
Arm SMI, kg/m2 a 1.6 ± 0.4 1.5 ± 0.3 1.4 ± 0.2 1.3 ± 0.3 0.316 0.20 d 1.7 ± 0.4 1.7 ± 0.2 0.711 0.06 d
Leg SMI,_kg/m2 a 5.8 ± 0.5 4.9 ± 0.8 5.6 ± 0.5 4.2 ± 0.7 <0.001** 0.74 d 5.9 ± 0.4 5.3 ± 0.6 0.001** 0.52 e
Low SMI frequency, % b 3 (10) 22 (56.4) <0.001** 0.48 0 (0) 8 (53.3) 0.002** 0.59 e 3 (17.6) 14 (58.3) 0.012* 0.41 d
BM, Kcal/day a 1338.3 ± 129.7 1244.6 ± 165.2 1253 ± 53.5 1089.7 ± 94.9 <0.001** 0.73 d 1398.5 ± 134.7 1341.5 ± 119.0 0.255 0.18 d
ECW/TBW a 0.383 ± 0.007 0.392 ± 0.010 0.384 ± 0.007 0.391 ± 0.007 0.003** 0.56 d 0.383 ± 0.007 0.393 ± 0.012 0.004** 0.45 d
BMI, kg/m2 a 22.2 ± 2.6 21.5 ± 3.7 21.9 ± 2.0 21.6 ± 4.9 0.964 0.01 d 22.4 ± 3.1 21.4 ± 2.9 0.169 0.21 d
BFP, % a 21.3 ± 7 24.9 ± 10 23.3 ± 7.3 30.5 ± 11.7 0.088 0.33 d 19.8 ± 6.6 21.5 ± 6.9 0.624 0.08 d
Obesity frequencies, % b 3 (10) 13 (33.3) 0.042* 0.27 e 0 (0) 6 (40) 0.018* 0.49 e 3 (17.6) 7 (29.2) 0.480 0.132 e
Disease duration, years a 4.6 ± 2.6 4.2 ± 2.0 4.8 ± 3.0
mRS c 4 [3–4] 3 [3–4] 4 [3–4]
Barthel index a 49.2 ± 22.2 55.0 ± 25.8 45.7 ± 19.7

Controls, healthy older adult group; BFP, body fat percentage; BI, Barthel index; BM, basal metabolism; BMI, body mass Index; ECW, extracellular water; mRS, modified Rankin scale; PSP, progressive supranuclear palsy group; SMI, skeletal muscle mass index; TBW, total body water.

Results are reported as mean ± standard deviation a, numbers (%) b, and median [interquartile range] c. Effect size was calculated using the following formula; |r| = Z/√n d and |φ| e.

* indicates p < 0.05

** indicates p < 0.01.

Comparison of body composition between the controls and the patients

The SMI of the PSP group was significantly lower than that of the control group in both the men (p = 0.010) and women (p < 0.001). In particular, the mean leg SMI of the PSP group was significantly lower than that of the controls for the men (p = 0.001) and women (p < 0.001) but not the mean arm SMI. The rate of participants with low muscle mass was significantly higher in the PSP group (56.4%) than in the control group (p < 0.001), with a similar result when analyzing by sex (58.3% of men, p = 0.012; 53.3% of women, p = 0.002). In the women, the basal metabolism was significantly lower in the PSP group than in the control group (p < 0.001), but there were no significant differences in the men. The ECW/TBW was significantly higher in the PSP group than in the control group in the men (p = 0.004) and women (p = 0.003). There were no significant differences in BMI. BFP showed no significant differences, but the women in the PSP group tended to have a higher BFP than those in the control group. The frequency of obesity was significantly higher in the PSP group than in the control group (p = 0.042). In the men, there was no significant difference in the frequency of obesity, whereas in the women, the frequency of obesity was significantly higher in the PSP group than in the control group (p = 0.018).

Correlation between the skeletal mass index and other factors in each group and by sex

The older women with PSP showed a lower SMI (p = 0.033), but there was no correlation between age and SMI in the other groups. There was a significantly positive correlation between BMI and SMI, except in the women in the control group (p = 0.009 for the women with PSP, p = 0.001 for the men in the control group, and p < 0.001 for the men with PSP). There was a moderate and higher positive correlation between basal metabolism and SMI in all groups, although there was no significant correlation for the women in the control group (p < 0.001 for the women with PSP, p < 0.001 for the men in the control group, and p < 0.001 for the men with PSP). There was significant correlation between ECW/TBW and SMI for the women with PSP (p = 0.011) but not for the other groups. There was a moderately significant correlation between BFP and SMI for the women with PSP (p = 0.009) but not for the other groups. In the entire PSP group, there was no significant correlation between SMI on one hand and disease duration, mRS and BI on the other (Table 2).

Table 2. Spearman’s rank-correlation coefficient between skeletal muscle mass index and the other parameters in each group.

CON Females SMI Age BMI BM ECW/TBW BFP
SMI 1.000 −0.121 0.138 0.524 −0.091 −0.044
Age - 1.000 0.273 −0.800** −0.148 0.257
BMI - - 1.000 −0.053 0.077 0.784**
BM - - - 1.000 −0.118 −0.014
ECW/TBW - - - - 1.000 0.035
BFP - - - - - 1.000
CON Males SMI Age BMI BM ECW/TBW BFP
SMI 1.000 −0.380 0.711** 0.897** 0.025 0.049
Age - 1.000 −0.206 −0.326 0.023 −0.245
BMI - - 1.000 0.505* 0.068 0.574*
BM - - - 1.000 0.057 −0.218
ECW/TBW - - - - 1.000 0.140
BFP - - - - - 1.000
PSP Females SMI Age BMI BM ECW/TBW BFP Duration mRS BI
SMI 1.000 −0.553* 0.925** 0.939** −0.636* 0.650** −0.116 −0.293 0.365
Age - 1.000 −0.378 −0.706** 0.589* −0.070 0.203 −0.086 −0.232
BMI - - 1.000 0.843** −0.621* 0.793** −0.115 −0.409 0.471
BM - - - 1.000 −0.600* 0.496 −0.211 −0.177 0.272
ECW/TBW - - - - 1.000 −0.393 −0.204 0.239 −0.417
BFP - - - - - 1.000 0.142 −0.571* 0.516*
Duration - - - - - - 1.000 −0.031 −0.144
mRS - - - - - - - 1.000 −0.839**
BI - - - - - - - - 1.000
PSP Males SMI Age BMI BM ECW/TBW BFP Duration mRS BI
SMI 1.000 0.018 0.663** 0.886** −0.032 0.096 0.209 −0.137 0.205
Age - 1.000 0.093 0.079 0.527** 0.177 0.039 0.414* −0.214
BMI - - 1.000 0.539** −0.138 0.742** 0.307 −0.020 0.231
BM - - - 1.000 −0.020 0.022 0.215 −0.128 0.208
ECW/TBW - - - - 1.000 −0.159 0.190 0.163 0-.453*
BFP - - - - - 1.000 0.154 −0.004 0.211
Duration - - - - - - 1.000 0.014 −0.065
mRS - - - - - - - 1.000 −0.682**
BI - - - - - - - - 1.000

BFP, body fat percentage; BI, Barthel index; BMI, body mass Index; BM, basal metabolism; CON, healthy older adult controls; ECW, extracellular water; mRS, modified Rankin Scale; PSP, progressive supranuclear palsy group; SMI, skeletal muscle mass index; TBW, total body water.

* indicates p < 0.05

** indicates p <0.01.

Discussion

This study is the first to investigate body composition in PSP, focusing on the skeletal muscle mass of patients with PSP in detail and comparing it to that of healthy older adults. We found that the PSP group had a greater proportion of individuals with low muscle mass compared with the group of healthy older participants.

The SMI was significantly lower in the PSP group than in the healthy control group, and many of the patients with PSP met the AWGS criteria for sarcopenia, although the BMI was similar. Our findings are of value in clarifying the characteristics of PSP by measuring body composition. In addition, there was no significant difference in the participants’ age between the patients with PSP and the healthy participants in this study. Therefore, skeletal muscle mass loss in PSP (as with other neurodegenerative diseases) might be due to inactivity, which is known to induce muscle fiber atrophy [17]. The main pathological lesions in PSP occur in the substantia nigra, tegmentum, pallidum, subthalamic nucleus, and cerebellum [7,18]. Therefore, patients with PSP exhibit bradykinesia, axial rigidity, and gait disturbance [7,8], which result in inactivity. Patients with PSP in this study showed low ADL levels, as shown by mRS and BI.

The increase in ECW/TBW showed edema, which was higher in the PSP group than in the healthy control group. Furthermore, the rate of obesity among the women with PSP, who tended to have higher BFP, was greater than among the healthy women. It has been reported that skeletal muscle loss can be accompanied by the accumulation of ectopic fat within muscles and has been associated with reduced motor function [19]. Our findings therefore show a change in body composition in PSP, with a reduction in skeletal muscle mass [16].

We found differences in terms of sex in the factors related to skeletal muscle mass loss in PSP, the first of which was the relationship between SMI and age. There was no significant correlation between SMI and age in the men with PSP. Their skeletal muscle mass loss was therefore likely induced by the disease rather than by aging [17]. However, the women with PSP showed a significant correlation between SMI and age, which indicates that the skeletal muscle mass loss could be induced not only by inactivity but also by aging in the women with PSP, unlike the men with PSP. The second point is the relationship between SMI and basal metabolism. Skeletal muscle mass was significantly related to basal metabolism, both in the men and women. However, the basal metabolism showed a significant correlation with age in the women but not the men. Furthermore, the women with PSP showed a greater effect size of skeletal muscle mass loss compared with the men with PSP. Women with PSP might show significantly lower basal metabolism compared with healthy women due to a reduction in skeletal muscle mass with aging and inactivity.

Our study had several limitations, the first of which was the first of which was its small sample size, which prevented us from performing a multivariate regression to show the causal relationship between the factors. The second limitation was that this study was lack of data about related factors and confounders causing skeletal muscle mass loss or sarcopenia, such as motor function (e.g., muscle strength, gait speed) [1,15], daily physical activity (e.g., exercise state) [20,21], nutrition sate (e.g., caloric pattern, intake of ergogenic or ergogenic drugs, bulbar dysfunction, anorexia) [2225]. Lastly, this was a retrospective cross-sectional single-center study. A future longitudinal multicenter study is needed to investigate the effects of low skeletal muscle mass on the functional prognosis in PSP.

In conclusion, we investigated the body composition parameters in patients with PSP, focusing on skeletal muscle mass, and compared them with those of healthy older adults. We showed that the PSP group had a high rate of low muscle mass compared with the healthy group. We also showed differences in terms of sex in muscle mass loss in the women with PSP, which was associated not only with inactivity but also with aging.

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank the patients and their families for their contributions. We would also like to thank Dr. Satoko Sakakibara (Department of Neurology), Dr. Misaki Sato (Department of Neurology), Naomi Matsuda, and the other physical therapists (Department of Rehabilitation) at the National Hospital Organization Higashinagoya National Hospital for their support.

Data Availability

All relevant data are within the paper.

Funding Statement

This work was supported by Grants-in Aid from the Research Committee of CNS Degenerative Diseases, Research on Policy Planning and Evaluation for Rare and Intractable Diseases, Health, Labour and Welfare Sciences Research Grants, the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare, Japan (20FC1049, to I.A.). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

References

  • 1.Cruz-Jentoft AJ, Baeyens JP, Bauer JM, Boirie Y, Cederholm T, Landi F, et al. Sarcopenia: European consensus on definition and diagnosis. Age Ageing. 2010;39: 412–423. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afq034 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Rizzoli R, Reginster JY, Arnal JF, Bautmans I, Beaudart C, Bischoff-Ferrari H, et al. Quality of life in sarcopenia and frailty. Calcif Tissue Int. 2013;93: 101–120. doi: 10.1007/s00223-013-9758-y [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Landi F, Liperoti R, Fusco D, Mastropaolo S, Quattrociocchi D, Proia A, et al. Sarcopenia and mortality among older nursing home residents. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2012;13: 121–126. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2011.07.004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Lanza E, Masetti C, Messana G, Muglia R, Pugliese N, Ceriani R, et al. Sarcopenia as a predictor of survival in patients undergoing bland transarterial embolization for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma. PLoS One. 2020;15: 1–12. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0232371 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Barichella M, Pinelli G, Iorio L, Cassani E, Valentino A, Pusani C, et al. Sarcopenia and Dynapenia in Patients With Parkinsonism. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2016;17: 640–646. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2016.03.016 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Tan AH, Hew YC, Lim SY, Ramli NM, Kamaruzzaman SB, Tan MP, et al. Altered body composition, sarcopenia, frailty, and their clinico-biological correlates, in Parkinson’s disease. Park Relat Disord. 2018;56: 58–64. doi: 10.1016/j.parkreldis.2018.06.020 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Steele JC, Richardson JC, Olszewski J. Progressive supranuclear palsy: A heterogeneous degeneration involving the brain stem, basal ganglia and cerebellum with vertical gaze and pseudobulbar palsy, nuchal dystonia and dementia. Semin Neurol. 2014;34: 129–150. doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1377058 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Höglinger GU, Respondek G, Stamelou M, Kurz C, Josephs KA, Lang AE, et al. Clinical diagnosis of progressive supranuclear palsy: The movement disorder society criteria. Mov Disord. 2017;32: 853–864. doi: 10.1002/mds.26987 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Hirani V, Naganathan V, Blyth F, Le Couteur DG, Seibel MJ, Waite LM, et al. Longitudinal associations between body composition, sarcopenic obesity and outcomes of frailty, disability, institutionalisation and mortality in community-dwelling older men: The Concord Health and Ageing in men project. Age Ageing. 2017;46: 413–420. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afw214 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Grimm MJ, Respondek G, Stamelou M, Arzberger T, Ferguson L, Gelpi E, et al. How to apply the movement disorder society criteria for diagnosis of progressive supranuclear palsy. Mov Disord. 2019;34: 1228–1232. doi: 10.1002/mds.27666 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Van Swieten JC, Koudstaal PJ, Visser MC, Schouten H, Van Gijn J. Interobserver agreement for the assessment of handicap in stroke patients. Stroke. 1988;19: 604–607. doi: 10.1161/01.str.19.5.604 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Buckinx F, Reginster JY, Dardenne N, Croisiser JL, Kaux JF, Beaudart C, et al. Concordance between muscle mass assessed by bioelectrical impedance analysis and by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry: A cross-sectional study Epidemiology of musculoskeletal disorders. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2015;16: 1–7. doi: 10.1186/s12891-015-0454-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Jayanama K, Putadechakun S, Srisuwarn P, Vallibhakara SAO, Chattranukulchai Shantavasinkul P, Sritara C, et al. Evaluation of Body Composition in Hemodialysis Thai Patients: Comparison between Two Models of Bioelectrical Impedance Analyzer and Dual-Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry. J Nutr Metab. 2018;2018. doi: 10.1155/2018/4537623 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Park I, Lee JH, Jang DH, Kim J, Hwang BR, Kim S, et al. Assessment of body water distribution in patients with sepsis during fluid resuscitation using multi-frequency direct segmental bioelectrical impedance analysis. Clin Nutr. 2020;39: 1826–1831. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2019.07.022 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Chen LYK, Liu LK, Woo J, Assantachai P, Auyeung TW, Bahyah KS, et al. Sarcopenia in Asia: Consensus report of the Asian working group for sarcopenia. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2014;15: 95–101. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2013.11.025 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Batsis JA, Villareal DT. Sarcopenic obesity in older adults: aetiology, epidemiology and treatment strategies. Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2018;14: 513–537. doi: 10.1038/s41574-018-0062-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Booth FW, Roberts CK, Thyfault JP, Ruegsegger GN, Toedebusch RG. Role of inactivity in chronic diseases: Evolutionary insight and pathophysiological mechanisms. Physiol Rev. 2017;97: 1351–1402. doi: 10.1152/physrev.00019.2016 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Oka M, Katayama S, Imon Y, Ohshita T, Mimori Y, Nakamura S. Abnormal signals on proton density-weighted MRI of the superior cerebellar peduncle in progressive supranuclear palsy. Acta Neurol Scand. 2001;104: 1–5. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0404.2001.00262.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Akima H, Yoshiko A, Tomita A, Ando R, Saito A, Ogawa M, et al. Relationship between quadriceps echo intensity and functional and morphological characteristics in older men and women. Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2017;70: 105–111. doi: 10.1016/j.archger.2017.01.014 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Steffl M, Bohannon R w, Sontakova L, Tufano JJ, Shiells K, Holmerova I. Relationship between sarcopenia and physical activity in older people: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Interv Aging. 2017;Volume 12: 835–845. doi: 10.2147/CIA.S132940 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Lee SY, Tung HH, Liu CY, Chen LK. Physical Activity and Sarcopenia in the Geriatric Population: A Systematic Review. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2018;19: 378–383. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2018.02.003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Naseeb MA, Volpe SL. Protein and exercise in the prevention of sarcopenia and aging. Nutr Res. 2017;40: 1–20. doi: 10.1016/j.nutres.2017.01.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Cruz-Jentoft AJ, Kiesswetter E, Drey M, Sieber CC. Nutrition, frailty, and sarcopenia. Aging Clin Exp Res. 2017;29: 43–48. doi: 10.1007/s40520-016-0709-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Azzolino D, Damanti S, Bertagnoli L, Lucchi T, Cesari M. Sarcopenia and swallowing disorders in older people. Aging Clin Exp Res. 2019;31: 799–805. doi: 10.1007/s40520-019-01128-3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Zhao WT, Yang M, Wu HM, Yang L, Zhang X mei, Huang Y. Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Association Between Sarcopenia and Dysphagia. J Nutr Heal Aging. 2018;22: 1003–1009. doi: 10.1007/s12603-018-1055-z [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Decision Letter 0

Ezio Lanza

16 Apr 2021

PONE-D-21-02875

Skeletal muscle loss and body composition in progressive supranuclear palsy: A retrospective cross-sectional study

PLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Aiba,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

Please submit your revised manuscript by Apr 30 2021 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Ezio Lanza, M.D.

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Additional Editor Comments :

Please consider citing in the introduction the following article, published  by PLOS ONE,  regarding the use of sarcopenia as predictor of survival also in the setting of cancer  

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/comments?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0232371

Journal Requirements:

Please review your reference list to ensure that it is complete and correct. If you have cited papers that have been retracted, please include the rationale for doing so in the manuscript text, or remove these references and replace them with relevant current references. Any changes to the reference list should be mentioned in the rebuttal letter that accompanies your revised manuscript. If you need to cite a retracted article, indicate the article’s retracted status in the References list and also include a citation and full reference for the retraction notice.

When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements.

1. Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf

2. Thank you for stating the following in the Competing Interests section:

"I.A. serves as a consultant for Biogen MA Inc. and AbbVie GK."

Please confirm that this does not alter your adherence to all PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials, by including the following statement: "This does not alter our adherence to  PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials.” (as detailed online in our guide for authors http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/competing-interests).  If there are restrictions on sharing of data and/or materials, please state these. Please note that we cannot proceed with consideration of your article until this information has been declared.

Please include your updated Competing Interests statement in your cover letter; we will change the online submission form on your behalf.

Please know it is PLOS ONE policy for corresponding authors to declare, on behalf of all authors, all potential competing interests for the purposes of transparency. PLOS defines a competing interest as anything that interferes with, or could reasonably be perceived as interfering with, the full and objective presentation, peer review, editorial decision-making, or publication of research or non-research articles submitted to one of the journals. Competing interests can be financial or non-financial, professional, or personal. Competing interests can arise in relationship to an organization or another person. Please follow this link to our website for more details on competing interests: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/competing-interests

3. We note you have included a table to which you do not refer in the text of your manuscript. Please ensure that you refer to Table 2 in your text; if accepted, production will need this reference to link the reader to the Table.

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

5. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: I thank the authors for taking consideration of the relation between body composition parts and PSP patients. In order for the manuscript to be scientifically valid regarding the association suggested, I suggest that adjustment for other confounders causing wasting and sarcopenia should be mentioned in the manuscript [exercise state of the patient versus controls, the caloric pattern [moderate, mild or high according to daily activity and occupation], details of ergogenic or ergopenic medications and nutritional state including the presence or absence of bulbar dysfunction or anorexia]. These factors should be elucidated in my experience in order to make the publication worthy of targeting the association between PSP and sarcopenia.

Reviewer #2: Manuscript by Takamatsu and Aiba is the first to report skeletal muscle loss in progressive supra nuclear palsy (PSP). Small size of studied groups of patients and controls is a significant limitation. However comparative analyses performed by sex, identified significant decrease in SMI in PSP groups driven by leg SMI.

This paper should be of interest in the field of clinical PSP.

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

PLoS One. 2021 Jun 10;16(6):e0253079. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0253079.r002

Author response to Decision Letter 0


22 Apr 2021

To editor and reviewers

We thank the editor and reviewers for taking the time to review our manuscript. We have revised the manuscript according to the editor’s and reviewers’ comments. The revised portions of the manuscript are highlighted in red.

Additional Editor Comments:

Please consider citing in the introduction the following article, published by PLOS ONE, regarding the use of sarcopenia as predictor of survival also in the setting of cancer

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/comments?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0232371

Following the editor’s suggestion, we cited the following article in the introduction: Lanza E et al. Sarcopenia as a predictor of survival in patients undergoing bland transarterial embolization for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma. PLoS One. 2020.

Introduction: page 3, lines 44-45.

Sarcopenia has been associated with motor functional disability, lower quality of life (QOL), and mortality [2–4].

References: page 11, lines 233-236.

4. Lanza E, Masetti C, Messana G, Muglia R, Pugliese N, Ceriani R, et al. Sarcopenia as a predictor of survival in patients undergoing bland transarterial embolization for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma. PLoS One. 2020;15: 1–12. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0232371

Journal Requirements:

Please review your reference list to ensure that it is complete and correct. If you have cited papers that have been retracted, please include the rationale for doing so in the manuscript text, or remove these references and replace them with relevant current references. Any changes to the reference list should be mentioned in the rebuttal letter that accompanies your revised manuscript. If you need to cite a retracted article, indicate the article’s retracted status in the References list and also include a citation and full reference for the retraction notice.

We confirmed our reference list to be complete and correct.

When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements.

1. Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf

Following the journal requirements, we revised the formatting of our manuscript based on these sample PDFs.

2. Thank you for stating the following in the Competing Interests section:

"I.A. serves as a consultant for Biogen MA Inc. and AbbVie GK."

Please confirm that this does not alter your adherence to all PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials, by including the following statement: "This does not alter our adherence to PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials.” (as detailed online in our guide for authors http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/competing-interests). If there are restrictions on sharing of data and/or materials, please state these. Please note that we cannot proceed with consideration of your article until this information has been declared.

Please include your updated Competing Interests statement in your cover letter; we will change the online submission form on your behalf.

Please know it is PLOS ONE policy for corresponding authors to declare, on behalf of all authors, all potential competing interests for the purposes of transparency. PLOS defines a competing interest as anything that interferes with, or could reasonably be perceived as interfering with, the full and objective presentation, peer review, editorial decision-making, or publication of research or non-research articles submitted to one of the journals. Competing interests can be financial or non-financial, professional, or personal. Competing interests can arise in relationship to an organization or another person. Please follow this link to our website for more details on competing interests: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/competing-interests

Yes, we agree with the PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials. We mentioned about COI in cover letter.

3. We note you have included a table to which you do not refer in the text of your manuscript. Please ensure that you refer to Table 2 in your text; if accepted, production will need this reference to link the reader to the Table.

Following the journal requirements, we revised the manuscript.

Results: page 7, line 144.

In the entire PSP group, there was no significant correlation between SMI on one hand and disease duration, mRS and BI on the other (Table 2).

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer #1: I thank the authors for taking consideration of the relation between body composition parts and PSP patients. In order for the manuscript to be scientifically valid regarding the association suggested, I suggest that adjustment for other confounders causing wasting and sarcopenia should be mentioned in the manuscript [exercise state of the patient versus controls, the caloric pattern [moderate, mild or high according to daily activity and occupation], details of ergogenic or ergopenic medications and nutritional state including the presence or absence of bulbar dysfunction or anorexia]. These factors should be elucidated in my experience in order to make the publication worthy of targeting the association between PSP and sarcopenia.

Thank you for raising very important points. The remark about confounders causing sarcopenia is critical and the lack of data was a significant limitation in this study. Therefore, following the reviewer’s comment, we revised the manuscript and added some references.

Discussion: page 9, lines 185-189.

The second limitation was that this study was lack of data about related factors and confounders causing skeletal muscle mass loss or sarcopenia, such as motor function (e.g., muscle strength, gait speed) [1,15], daily physical activity (e.g., exercise state) [20,21], nutrition sate (e.g., caloric pattern, intake of ergogenic or ergogenic drugs, bulbar dysfunction, anorexia) [22–25].

References: page 13, line 294 – page 14, line 312.

20. Steffl M, Bohannon R w, Sontakova L, Tufano JJ, Shiells K, Holmerova I. Relationship between sarcopenia and physical activity in older people: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Interv Aging. 2017;Volume 12: 835–845. doi:10.2147/CIA.S132940

21. Lee SY, Tung HH, Liu CY, Chen LK. Physical Activity and Sarcopenia in the Geriatric Population: A Systematic Review. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2018;19: 378–383. doi:10.1016/j.jamda.2018.02.003

22. Naseeb MA, Volpe SL. Protein and exercise in the prevention of sarcopenia and aging. Nutr Res. 2017;40: 1–20. doi:10.1016/j.nutres.2017.01.001

23. Cruz-Jentoft AJ, Kiesswetter E, Drey M, Sieber CC. Nutrition, frailty, and sarcopenia. Aging Clin Exp Res. 2017;29: 43–48. doi:10.1007/s40520-016-0709-0

24. Azzolino D, Damanti S, Bertagnoli L, Lucchi T, Cesari M. Sarcopenia and swallowing disorders in older people. Aging Clin Exp Res. 2019;31: 799–805. doi:10.1007/s40520-019-01128-3

25. Zhao WT, Yang M, Wu HM, Yang L, Zhang X mei, Huang Y. Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Association Between Sarcopenia and Dysphagia. J Nutr Heal Aging. 2018;22: 1003–1009. doi:10.1007/s12603-018-1055-z

Reviewer #2: Manuscript by Takamatsu and Aiba is the first to report skeletal muscle loss in progressive supra nuclear palsy (PSP). Small size of studied groups of patients and controls is a significant limitation. However comparative analyses performed by sex, identified significant decrease in SMI in PSP groups driven by leg SMI.

This paper should be of interest in the field of clinical PSP.

Thank you for reviewing our manuscript and being interest. We would like to increase the sample size and proceed with further verification.

Attachment

Submitted filename: Responce_to_Reviews_Takamatsu and Aiba_Plos One_21Apr2021.docx

Decision Letter 1

Ezio Lanza

28 May 2021

Skeletal muscle loss and body composition in progressive supranuclear palsy: A retrospective cross-sectional study

PONE-D-21-02875R1

Dear Dr. Aiba,

We’re pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been judged scientifically suitable for publication and will be formally accepted for publication once it meets all outstanding technical requirements.

Within one week, you’ll receive an e-mail detailing the required amendments. When these have been addressed, you’ll receive a formal acceptance letter and your manuscript will be scheduled for publication.

An invoice for payment will follow shortly after the formal acceptance. To ensure an efficient process, please log into Editorial Manager at http://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/, click the 'Update My Information' link at the top of the page, and double check that your user information is up-to-date. If you have any billing related questions, please contact our Author Billing department directly at authorbilling@plos.org.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper to help maximize its impact. If they’ll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team as soon as possible -- no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

Kind regards,

Ezio Lanza, M.D.

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Reviewer #1: All comments have been addressed

Reviewer #2: All comments have been addressed

  

Acceptance letter

Ezio Lanza

2 Jun 2021

PONE-D-21-02875R1

Skeletal muscle loss and body composition in progressive supranuclear palsy: A retrospective cross-sectional study

Dear Dr. Aiba:

I'm pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been deemed suitable for publication in PLOS ONE. Congratulations! Your manuscript is now with our production department.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please let them know about your upcoming paper now to help maximize its impact. If they'll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team within the next 48 hours. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information please contact onepress@plos.org.

If we can help with anything else, please email us at plosone@plos.org.

Thank you for submitting your work to PLOS ONE and supporting open access.

Kind regards,

PLOS ONE Editorial Office Staff

on behalf of

Dr. Ezio Lanza

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Responce_to_Reviews_Takamatsu and Aiba_Plos One_21Apr2021.docx

    Data Availability Statement

    All relevant data are within the paper.


    Articles from PLoS ONE are provided here courtesy of PLOS

    RESOURCES