Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Aug 1.
Published in final edited form as: Int J Cancer. 2021 Mar 8;149(3):535–545. doi: 10.1002/ijc.33541

Aspirin and other nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, statins and risk of non-Hodgkin lymphoma

Mark Liebow 1, Melissa C Larson 2, Carrie A Thompson 3, Grzegorz S Nowakowski 3, Timothy G Call 3, William R Macon 4, Neil E Kay 3, Thomas M Habermann 3, Susan L Slager 2, James R Cerhan 5
PMCID: PMC8192479  NIHMSID: NIHMS1701322  PMID: 33644854

Abstract

Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and statin drugs may protect against the development of non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL), but data are limited, particularly for NHL subtypes. Furthermore, some in vitro, animal and epidemiologic data suggest there may be a synergistic effect of these two agents, but there has been no test of this hypothesis in NHL. We evaluated the self-reported use of NSAIDs and statins in a clinic-based study of 1703 NHL patients and 2199 frequency-matched controls. Unconditional logistic regression was used to estimate odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs), adjusted for potential confounding variables. We observed an inverse association of regular use of low-dose aspirin with risk of NHL (OR = 0.82; 95% CI 0.70–0.96) that was stronger with longer duration of use (P < .01). There were no associations for use of regular or extra-strength aspirin, ibuprofen, other NSAIDs, statins or other cholesterol-lowering drugs with NHL risk, while an inverse association with COX-2 inhibitors was equivocal. There was also no interaction of low-dose aspirin and statins on NHL risk. Inverse associations of similar magnitude to all NHL were observed for regular use of low-dose aspirin with diffuse large B-cell, follicular, marginal zone and all other lymphomas, although not all associations were statistically significant. In conclusion, low-dose aspirin but not regular/extra strength aspirin, other NSAIDs or statin use was associated with lower risk of NHL. Beyond the potential for the primary prevention of NHL, these data also point to a role of anti-platelet or other effects of low-dose aspirin in lymphomagenesis that warrant follow-up.

Keywords: aspirin, non-Hodgkin lymphoma, prevention, statins

1 |. INTRODUCTION

Non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) is a heterogeneous group of malignancies with an estimated 81 560 new cases and 20 720 deaths in the United States in 2021.1 Although our understanding of the etiology of NHL remains incomplete, risk has been consistently associated with chronic inflammation related to infections, autoimmune disease and other chronic disease processes.2 Aspirin and other non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), as well as statin drugs, are known to reduce levels of inflammation. These drugs are widely used, often chronically, and thus are attractive classes of medications to evaluate in the prevention of cancer. Indeed, the United States Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) recommended (Grade B) initiating low-dose aspirin (81 mg/d) for the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease (CVD) and colorectal cancer in adults aged 50 to 59 years who have a 10% or greater 10-year risk of CVD, have a least at 10-year life expectancy and are not at increased risk of bleeding; a Grade C was given for adults aged 60 to 69 years, and evidence was considered incomplete for adults of other ages.3 This was the first USPSTF recommendation for a pharmacologic agent for cancer chemoprevention in a population not characterized as having a high risk of developing cancer.4

Evidence for a role of aspirin, other NSAIDs and statins in the etiology of NHL is still emerging. In a meta-analysis of 17 studies (12 case-control and 5 cohort studies) in adults, neither the use of aspirin (odds ratio [OR] = 1.02, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.89–1.17) nor nonaspirin NSAIDs (OR = 1.26, 95% CI 0.86–1.85) were associated with NHL risk, although aspirin use was protective for CLL/SLL (OR = 0.70, 95% CI 0.54–0.91) and nonaspirin NSAIDs use was associated with NHL risk in women (OR = 1.41, 95% CI 1.01–1.97).5 In a meta-analysis of 10 studies (5 case-control, 4 cohort and 1 randomized trial), statin use was inversely associated with overall NHL risk (OR = 0.82, 95% CI 0.69–0.99); an inverse association was also observed for chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma (CLL/SLL), diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), follicular lymphoma and T-cell lymphoma, but was only statistically significant for marginal zone lymphoma (MZL; OR = 0.54, 95% CI 0.31–0.94).6 Of particular note, however, excluding statin use within one year of diagnosis attenuated the association with NHL risk (OR = 0.92, 95% CI 0.80–1.06).

We present data from a large case-control study on the association of aspirin, other NSAIDs, and statins with risk of NHL. We were able to assess details of use, adjust for potential confounding factors and systematically test for subtype-specific associations for the major NHL subtypes. Furthermore, we assessed the joint effects of NSAIDs and statins on risk, which is of interest as there is some evidence of a synergistic effect of statins and NSAIDs as a combination regimen for cancer chemoprevention.7

2 |. METHODS

2.1 |. Study population

We have previously published full details of this clinic-based, case-control study conducted at the Mayo Clinic (Rochester, MN).8 Briefly, we prospectively offered enrollment to all consecutive cases of pathologically confirmed lymphoma, including CLL/SLL and Hodgkin lymphoma (HL), who were age 18 years and older; a resident of Minnesota, Iowa or Wisconsin at the time of diagnosis; within 9 months of initial diagnosis enrollment; and without a history of lymphoma, leukemia or HIV/AIDS. A Mayo Clinic hematopathologist reviewed materials for each case to verify the diagnosis and to classify each case according to the WHO Classification of Neoplastic Diseases of the Hematopoietic and Lymphoid Tissues.9 Of the 3844 eligible cases identified from 1 September 2002 through 31 December 2012, 2640 (68.7%) participated, 447 (11.6%) refused, 73 (1.9%) were unreachable (ie, we were unable to contact them after multiple attempts) and 684 (17.8%) failed to consent within 9 months of diagnosis or despite consenting failed to complete the protocol within 12 months of diagnosis. We excluded 219 cases with a diagnosis of HL, leaving 2421 cases.

We enrolled clinic-based controls from Mayo Clinic Rochester patients who had prescheduled general medical examinations (ie, not a diagnostic examination for a specific, active symptom or new disease) in the Department of Medicine. Controls were eligible if they had no history of lymphoma, leukemia or HIV/AIDS; were age 18 years or older; and a resident of Minnesota, Iowa or Wisconsin at the time of appointment. We used a computer program to randomly select controls, frequency matched to cases based on the marginal distribution of 5-year age group, sex and geographic location of residence (based on distance from Rochester, Minnesota and urban/rural status). Of the 4222 eligible controls identified from 1 September 2002 through 31 December 2012, 2430 (57.6%) participated, 1372 (32.5%) refused and 420 (9.9%) failed to consent within 9 months of selection or despite consenting failed to complete the protocol within 12 months of selection.

2.2 |. Exposure assessment

We used a self-administered questionnaire provided at enrollment to collect information on demographic characteristics, family history of cancer, anthropometrics, medical history (including history of rheumatoid arthritis [RA] and osteoarthritis [OA]), as well as selected lifestyle and other factors. We collected data on use of statin cholesterol-lowering drugs and other cholesterol-lowering drugs, excluding use in the last 2 years, as well as age at first use and number of years used. We also asked participants “excluding the last two years, did you regularly take any of the following medications? (exclude use of less than once per month)” for baby or low-dose aspirin (162 mg or less); regular strength aspirin (163 mg or more, eg, Bufferin, Anacin, Bayer, Excedrin, Ecotrin, etc.); ibuprofen (eg, Motrin, Advil, Nuprin, Medipin, etc.); other anti-inflammatory analgesics (eg, Naprosyn, Anaprox, Aleve, Voltaren, Feldene, Toradol, Indocin, etc.); and COX-2 inhibitors (eg, Celebrex, Vioxx, etc.). For each yes response, we then inquired about average days per month used; on days used, the number of pills taken; and the total number of years taken. For each drug, we defined a user as someone who reported use at least four times per month for at least 1 year; a nonuser was defined as no or infrequent use (less than four times per month). Average number of pills per week was defined as the average number of days per month used multiplied by the number of pills taken on days used, then divided by 4. Pill-years were defined as the average number of pills per day multiplied by years of use. As virtually all low-dose aspirin users reported one pill per day, we did not calculate pill-years for this exposure.

The NSAIDs questions were updated in 2004 and the older version could not be harmonized. After excluding these participants, there were 1703 NHL cases (64.5%) and 2199 controls (90.5%) available for analysis. Participants (cases and controls combined) with NSAIDs data were more likely to be female (44.6% vs 36.7%), slightly older (mean age 61.7 vs 59.5 years) and residents of Minnesota (74.6% vs 68.6%), but had a similar distribution by NHL subtype. These modest differences suggest a relatively small potential for selection bias, and as noted below, all models were adjusted for age, gender and residence.

2.3 |. Statistical analysis

We used unconditional logistic regression to estimate ORs and corresponding 95% CIs for the association of medication use with risk of NHL, adjusting for the design variables of age at enrollment, sex and residence. A P-trend was calculated in unconditional logistic regression models using the ordinal scoring of the increasing exposure categories with the no use as the reference category. We considered a nominal P < .05 as statistically significant. We evaluated potential confounding first by adding education level and year of first registration at Mayo to the basic model, and second by further adding family history of NHL in a first degree relative, body mass index (BMI in kg/m2, and grouped into WHO categories), smoking (pack-years), alcohol use (never, former, current use) and history of RA or OA to the model. We also conducted sensitivity analyses stratified on gender, BMI (<25 vs 25+ kg/m2), smoking status (ever vs never), and history of RA or OA (ever vs never).

We assessed subtype associations using polytomous logistic regression10 to simultaneously model a comparison between the control group with each of the five NHL subtypes—CLL/SLL, DLBCL, follicular lymphoma, MZL and one group that included all of the other (less common) subtypes combined. We used a 4 df Wald test to assess heterogeneity across the subtypes, and a P < .05 was considered statistically significant. All analyses were conducted using SAS software system (SAS Institute, Cary, NC; version 9.4).

3 |. RESULTS

The mean age of cases was 61.8 years and 59% were male, while the mean age of controls was 61.6 years and 53% were male (Table 1). All participants resided in Minnesota, Iowa or Wisconsin, and 75% had some education after high school, slightly higher in controls. Compared to controls, cases had a slightly higher BMI, family history of NHL and had ever smoked cigarettes. Alcohol use and history of RA were similar between cases and controls while history of OA was somewhat more common in controls. The most common NHL subtype was CLL/SLL (N = 495), followed by follicular lymphoma (N = 410), DLBCL (N = 326) and MZL (N = 134).

TABLE 1.

Participant characteristics, Mayo Clinic Case-Control Study of NHL, 2002–2012

Controls
(N = 2199)
Cases
(N = 1703)
Characteristic N % N %
Age group
 ≤40 144 6.5 98 5.8
 41–50 257 11.7 223 13.1
 51–55 234 10.6 183 10.7
 56–60 236 10.7 221 13.0
 61–65 382 17.4 276 16.2
 66–70 349 15.9 242 14.2
 71–75 305 13.9 207 12.2
 >75 292 13.3 253 14.9
Age in years, mean (SD) 61.6 (13.2) 61.8 (13.1)
Sex
 Male 1164 52.9 998 58.6
 Female 1035 47.1 705 41.4
State of residence
 Iowa 266 12.1 314 18.4
 Minnesota 1736 78.9 1175 69.0
 Wisconsin 197 9.0 214 12.6
Highest education level
 Less than high school graduate 56 2.6 87 5.1
 High school graduate 448 20.4 372 21.9
 Some college/vocational school 594 27.1 515 30.4
 College graduated 465 21.2 340 20.0
 Graduate or professional school 631 28.8 382 22.5
 Missing 5 7
BMl 2 years ago 27.8 5.3 28.3 5.3
Family history of NHL
 No 1954 92.0 1419 86.9
 Yes 170 8.0 213 13.1
 Missing 75 71
Smoking history
 Never 1235 56.4 884 52.2
 Former 841 38.4 710 41.9
 Current 113 5.1 101 5.9
 Missing 10 8
Alcohol history
 Never 208 9.5 200 11.8
 Former 307 14.0 292 17.2
 Current 1673 76.1 1201 70.5
 Missing 11 10
Rheumatoid arthritis
 No 1990 94.8 1537 93.6
 Yes 110 5.2 105 6.4
 Missing 99 61
Osteoarthritis
 No 1607 78.0 1379 84.9
 Yes 454 22.0 245 15.1
 Missing 138 79

Use of regular or extra-strength aspirin (16.6% of cases and 16.0% of controls) was not associated with risk of NHL in the basic model that adjusted for study design variables (age, sex and residence), or after adjusting for education and time in the Mayo system or other potential NHL confounders (Table 2). In contrast, we observed an inverse association of low-dose aspirin use (28.5% of cases and 34.9% of controls) with risk of NHL (OR = 0.74; 95% CI 0.64–0.85), with a stronger association for longer duration of use in the basic model (Table 2). These associations were similar or slightly stronger after adjusting for education and year of first registration at Mayo, suggesting that these variables were unlikely to be major confounders. After further adjustment for family history of NHL, BMI, smoking, alcohol use and history of RA, the inverse associations attenuated slightly (eg, OR = 0.82 for regular use of low-dose aspirin; 95% CI 0.70–0.96) but remained statistically significant.

TABLE 2.

Association of aspirin and other NSAIDs use with NHL risk, Mayo Clinic Case-Control Study, 2002–2012

Basic modela Basic + SESb Basic + confoundersc
Regular use of agent Controls Cases OR 95% CI OR 95% CI OR 95% CI
Regular or extra strength aspirin
 Nonuser 1808 1398 1.00 Reference 1.00 Reference 1.00 Reference
 Userd 344 279 0.99 (0.83, 1.19) 0.99 (0.82, 1.20) 1.00 (0.82, 1.22)
 Pills per week
  ≤7 171 148 1.06 (0.84, 1.35) 1.05 (0.82, 1.35) 1.00 (0.77, 1.30)
  >7 166 125 0.91 (0.71, 1.17) 0.91 (0.70, 1.20) 1.00 (0.76, 1.32)
  P-trend .67 .67 .98
 Duration of use, years
  <5 69 54 0.99 (0.68, 1.44) 1.01 (0.68, 1.51) 0.98 (0.64, 1.49)
  5–9 61 51 1.00 (0.67, 1.48) 1.10 (0.73, 1.67) 1.17 (0.76, 1.79)
  10 or more 214 174 0.99 (0.80, 1.24) 0.95 (0.75, 1.20) 0.97 (0.76, 1.23)
  P-trend .94 .81 .95
 Pill-years
  ≤6.0 110 99 1.10 (0.82, 1.47) 1.07 (0.78, 1.46) 1.11 (0.80, 1.53)
  6.1–15.0 116 89 0.94 (0.70, 1.26) 0.99 (0.72, 1.35) 0.90 (0.65, 1.24)
  >15.0 111 85 0.93 (0.69, 1.26) 0.90 (0.65, 1.24) 1.00 (0.71, 1.40)
  P-trend .66 .64 .83
Low dose aspirin
 Nonuser 1409 1187 1.00 Reference 1.00 Reference 1.00 Reference
 Userd 754 472 0.74 (0.64, 0.85) 0.73 (0.62, 0.85) 0.82 (0.70, 0.96)
 Duration of use, years
  <5 218 138 0.74 (0.59, 0.94) 0.74 (0.57, 0.94) 0.83 (0.64, 1.07)
  5–9 224 157 0.81 (0.64, 1.01) 0.79 (0.62, 1.01) 0.92 (0.72, 1.19)
  10 or more 312 177 0.69 (0.56, 0.85) 0.68 (0.54, 0.84) 0.73 (0.58, 0.92)
  P-trend .000080 .000087 .0091
Ibuprofen
 Nonuser 1776 1350 1.00 Reference 1.00 Reference 1.00 Reference
 Userd 386 317 1.08 (0.91, 1.28) 1.09 (0.91, 1.30) 1.11 (0.92, 1.35)
 Pills per week
  ≤7 40 32 1.09 (0.67, 1.77) 1.22 (0.73, 2.04) 1.10 (0.65, 1.87)
  >7 343 281 1.07 (0.90, 1.28) 1.07 (0.88, 1.29) 1.11 (0.91, 1.35)
  P-trend .42 .44 .29
 Duration of use, years
  <5 103 73 0.89 (0.65, 1.23) 0.89 (0.64, 1.25) 0.99 (0.69, 1.42)
  5–9 84 69 1.07 (0.76, 1.49) 1.14 (0.80, 1.63) 1.12 (0.77, 1.63)
  10+ 199 175 1.18 (0.95, 1.48) 1.17 (0.92, 1.48) 1.17 (0.92, 1.49)
  P-trend .17 .19 .19
 Pill-years
  ≤5.0 138 102 0.94 (0.71, 1.24) 0.98 (0.73, 1.31) 1.00 (0.74, 1.35)
  5.1–13.3 124 107 1.19 (0.90, 1.57) 1.23 (0.92, 1.64) 1.24 (0.92, 1.68)
  >13.3 121 104 1.11 (0.84, 1.48) 1.06 (0.79, 1.43) 1.10 (0.80, 1.51)
  P-trend .26 .33 .24
Other anti-inflammatory NSAIDs (eg, Naprosyn, Anaprox, Aleve, Voltaren, Feldene, Toradol, Indocin, etc.)
 Nonuser 1987 1572 1.00 Reference 1.00 Reference 1.00 Reference
 Userd 184 94 0.66 (0.51, 0.87) 0.70 (0.53, 0.93) 0.78 (0.58, 1.05)
 Pills per week
  ≤7 55 33 0.87 (0.55, 1.38) 0.98 (0.61, 1.58) 1.13 (0.68, 1.89)
  >7 127 60 0.59 (0.42, 0.81) 0.60 (0.43, 0.85) 0.68 (0.48, 0.97)
  P-trend .0013 .0063 .062
 Duration of use, years
  <5 85 44 0.67 (0.46, 0.99) 0.69 (0.46, 1.03) 0.77 (0.50, 1.18)
  5–9 38 22 0.75 (0.43, 1.30) 0.90 (0.50, 1.63) 0.95 (0.52, 1.73)
  10+ 61 28 0.60 (0.37, 0.95) 0.61 (0.37, 1.00) 0.70 (0.43, 1.17)
  P-trend .0045 .019 .12
 Pill-years
  ≤2.6 66 31 0.63 (0.40, 0.98) 0.68 (0.42, 1.09) 0.79 (0.48, 1.30)
  2.7–8.0 62 28 0.58 (0.37, 0.93) 0.59 (0.36, 0.96) 0.67 (0.41, 1.11)
  >8.0 53 34 0.82 (0.52, 1.30) 0.91 (0.56, 1.48) 0.99 (0.60, 1.63)
  P-trend .017 .065 .27
COX-2 inhibitors
 Nonuser 2000 1586 1.00 Reference 1.00 Reference 1.00 Reference
 Userd 171 83 0.59 (0.45, 0.79) 0.66 (0.49, 0.89) 0.70 (0.51, 0.96)
 Pills per week
  ≤7 127 61 0.59 (0.43, 0.82) 0.65 (0.46, 0.91) 0.62 (0.43, 0.90)
  >7 43 20 0.55 (0.32, 0.95) 0.65 (0.36, 1.17) 0.92 (0.50, 1.68)
  P-trend .00029 .0073 .065
 Duration of use, years
  <5 123 58 0.55 (0.40, 0.76) 0.61 (0.43, 0.87) 0.60 (0.41, 0.87)
  5–9 27 16 0.79 (0.42, 1.50) 0.81 (0.41, 1.59) 1.32 (0.65, 2.68)
  10+ 21 9 0.63 (0.28, 1.41) 0.80 (0.35, 1.81) 0.72 (0.30, 1.74)
  P-trend .0031 .036 .14
 Pill-years
  ≤2.0 71 42 0.68 (0.45, 1.01) 0.79 (0.52, 1.20) 0.75 (0.47, 1.18)
  2.1–5.0 52 15 0.37 (0.20, 0.67) 0.38 (0.20, 0.71) 0.33 (0.17, 0.67)
  >5.0 47 24 0.66 (0.40, 1.10) 0.74 (0.43, 1.26) 1.09 (0.62, 1.92)
  P-trend .00045 .0060 .070
a

Adjusted for age, sex and residence.

b

Further adjusted for education and year of first registration at Mayo.

c

Further adjusted for education, family history of lymphoma, BMI, smoking history, alcohol use, RA and osteoarthritis.

d

A user is defined as someone who reported use as least once per week for at least one year.

While a test for heterogeneity for the associations of low-dose aspirin use by gender was not statistically significant (P = .28), the inverse association with NHL was stronger in females (OR = 0.71, 95% CI 0.55–0.92) than males, where it was attenuated and was not statistically significant (OR = 0.89, 95% CI 0.73–1.10). In males, duration of low-dose aspirin use did show an inverse trend, but this was not statistically significant and it was weaker than the duration trend in females (Table 3).

TABLE 3.

Association of low dose aspirin, other NSAIDs and COX-2 inhibitor use with risk of NHL by gender, Mayo Clinic Case-Control Study, 2002–2012a

Females Males
Controls Cases Odds ratio 95% CI Controls Cases Odds ratio 95% CI
Low dose aspirin
 Nonuser 590 465 1.00 Reference 606 546 1.00 Reference
 Userb 258 128 0.71 (0.55, 0.92) 365 277 0.89 (0.73, 1.10)
 Duration of use, years
  <5 88 45 0.73 (0.49, 1.09) 89 74 0.92 (0.65, 1.30)
  5–9 75 43 0.78 (0.51, 1.18) 111 95 1.03 (0.75, 1.40)
  10 or more 95 40 0.64 (0.42, 0.96) 165 108 0.79 (0.59, 1.04)
  P-trend .012 .17
Other anti-inflammatory NSAIDs (eg, Naprosyn, Anaprox, Aleve, Voltaren, Feldene, Toradol, Indocin, etc.)
 Nonuser 757 545 1.00 Reference 912 794 1.00 Reference
 Userb 86 47 0.86 (0.58, 1.28) 67 38 0.70 (0.46, 1.09)
 Pills per week
  ≤7 28 15 0.96 (0.48, 1.91) 16 14 1.42 (0.65, 3.08)
  >1 57 32 0.83 (0.51, 1.34) 50 24 0.55 (0.32, 0.92)
  P-trend .45 .055
 Duration of use, years
  <5 46 21 0.66 (0.38, 1.17) 24 17 0.95 (0.48, 1.86)
  5–9 17 10 1.13 (0.48, 2.65) 15 11 0.82 (0.36, 1.89)
  10 or more 23 16 1.07 (0.54, 2.13) 28 10 0.44 (0.20, 0.94)
  P-trend .87 .042
 Pill-years
  ≤2.6 30 14 0.75 (0.37, 1.49) 21 13 0.84 (0.40, 1.75)
  2.7–8.0 36 14 0.56 (0.28, 1.09) 19 13 0.87 (0.41, 1.84)
  >8.0 19 19 1.71 (0.85, 3.42) 25 12 0.54 (0.26, 1.14)
  P-trend .99 .11
COX-2 inhibitors
 Nonuser 761 560 1.00 Reference 927 797 1.00 Reference
 Userb 83 36 0.60 (0.39, 0.92) 49 34 0.85 (0.53, 1.36)
 Pills per week
  ≤7 65 24 0.50 (0.30, 0.83) 38 24 0.80 (0.47, 1.38)
  >7 17 12 1.00 (0.46, 2.19) 11 8 0.79 (0.30, 2.07)
  P-trend .092 .38
 Duration of use, years
  <5 60 26 0.56 (0.34, 0.93) 35 21 0.64 (0.36, 1.13)
  5–9 12 8 1.07 (0.42, 2.75) 7 7 1.72 (0.58, 5.15)
  10 or more 11 2 0.31 (0.07, 1.43) 7 6 1.40 (0.43, 4.52)
  P-trend .036 .91
 Pill-years
  ≤2.0 36 19 0.69 (0.38, 1.27) 19 15 0.82 (0.40, 1.66)
  2.1–5.0 28 5 0.24 (0.09, 0.65) 16 6 0.48 (0.18, 1.27)
  >5.0 18 12 1.01 (0.47, 2.18) 14 11 1.18 (0.51, 2.73)
  P-trend .059 .54
a

Adjusted for age, sex, residence, education, year of first registration at Mayo, family history of lymphoma, BMI, smoking history, alcohol use, RA and osteoarthritis.

b

A user is defined as someone who reported use as least once per week for at least one year.

We next evaluated the association of low-dose aspirin use with NHL risk in selected subgroups. The inverse association with NHL was observed in those with a BMI of <25 kg/m2 (OR = 0.80, 95% CI 0.59–1.08) and ≥25 kg/m2 (OR = 0.82, 95% CI 0.68–0.99) and in ever smokers (OR = 0.81, 95% CI 0.65–1.03) and never smokers (OR = 0.82, 95% CI 0.66–1.02). In analyses stratified on history of either OA or RA, any regular low-dose aspirin use was inversely associated with NHL in those with no history (OR = 0.79, 95% CI 0.65–0.94) but was attenuated in those with any history (OR = 0.92, 95% CI 0.66–1.27). B symptoms, which include fever, night sweats and weight loss, are not infrequent in NHL patients up to 6 months before diagnosis and could lead to use of antipyretics potentially leading to reverse causation or recall bias of earlier use. However, respondents excluded use in the two years before diagnosis, and when we excluded cases with B symptoms (N = 546) the inverse association with low-dose aspirin use remained (OR = 0.78, 95% CI 0.65–0.92).

For low-dose aspirin, the strongest inverse trends were observed for DLBCL and all other subtypes, followed by follicular lymphoma, and MZL, while there were no consistent associations for CLL/SLL (Table 4). However, the test for heterogeneity by NHL subtype was not statistically significant.

TABLE 4.

Association aspirin, other NSAIDs and statins use with risk of NHL subtypes, Mayo Clinic Case-Control Study, 2002–2012a

CLL/SLL DLBCL Follicular Marginal zone All other
Regular use of agent N OR 95% Cl N OR 95% Cl N OR 95% Cl N OR 95% Cl N OR 95% Cl (P-heterogeneity
Regular or extra strength aspirin
 Nonuser 398 1.00 Reference 280 1.00 Reference 335 1.00 Reference 114 1.00 Reference 271 1.00 Reference
 Userb 87 1.11 (0.83, 1.47) 41 0.71 (0.48, 1.05) 70 1.03 (0.76, 1.40) 17 0.83 (0.48, 1.44) 64 1.17 (0.84, 1.62) .24
Low dose aspirin
 Any use
  Nonuser 332 1.00 Reference 227 1.00 Reference 290 1.00 Reference 94 1.00 Reference 244 1.00 Reference
  Userb 151 0.95 (0.75, 1.20) 88 0.74 (0.55, 1.00) 113 0.79 (0.61, 1.03) 37 0.80 (0.52, 1.22) 83 0.74 (0.55, 0.99) .56
 Duration of use, years
  <5 57 1.25 (0.89, 1.77) 20 0.56 (0.32, 0.97) 32 0.77 (0.50, 1.18) 6 0.52 (0.22, 1.23) 23 0.67 (0.40, 1.11)
   5–9 42 0.85 (0.58, 1.26) 32 1.04 (0.68, 1.59) 36 0.82 (0.55, 1.24) 15 1.10 (0.60, 2.03) 32 0.98 (0.64, 1.51)
   10+ 52 0.80 (0.57, 1.13) 36 0.65 (0.42, 1.02) 45 0.79 (0.55, 1.14) 16 0.76 (0.41, 1.43) 28 0.61 (0.39, 0.95) .24
   P-trend .22 .087 .12 .47 .043
Ibuprofen
 Nonuser 382 1.00 Reference 268 1.00 Reference 318 1.00 Reference 108 1.00 Reference 274 1.00 Reference
 Userb 104 1.30 (0.99, 1.69) 51 0.84 (0.58, 1.20) 85 1.28 (0.96, 1.70) 21 0.93 (0.55, 1.57) 56 0.98 (0.70, 1.38) .15
Other anti-inflammatory NSAIDs
 Nonuser 450 1.00 Reference 301 1.00 Reference 380 1.00 Reference 121 1.00 Reference 320 1.00 Reference
 Userb 35 1.02 (0.68, 1.53) 13 0.54 (0.28, 1.02) 23 0.75 (0.46, 1.22) 9 0.99 (0.47, 2.10) 14 0.63 (0.35, 1.12) .33
COX-2 inhibitor
 Nonuser 460 1.00 Reference 296 1.00 Reference 385 1.00 Reference 125 1.00 Reference 320 1.00 Reference
 Userb 24 0.65 (0.39, 1.07) 19 0.89 (0.52, 1.55) 18 0.60 (0.35, 1.05) 7 0.78 (0.33, 1.82) 15 0.72 (0.40, 1.28) .84
Statins
 Never 317 1.00 Reference 223 1.00 Reference 274 1.00 Reference 93 1.00 Reference 229 1.00 Reference
 Ever 173 1.14 (0.91, 1.44) 94 0.86 (0.64, 1.14) 130 0.96 (0.75, 1.23) 41 0.86 (0.57, 1.32) 107 0.98 (0.75, 1.30) .46
Other cholesterol drugs
 Never 448 1.00 Reference 294 1.00 Reference 371 1.00 Reference 124 1.00 Reference 312 1.00 Reference
 Ever 37 1.13 (0.74, 1.74) 20 0.95 (0.55, 1.65) 22 0.86 (0.52, 1.42) 9 1.12 (0.53, 2.38) 18 0.82 (0.47, 1.45) .83
a

Adjusted for age, sex, residence, education, year of first registration at Mayo, family history of lymphoma, BMI, smoking history, alcohol use, RA and osteoarthritis.

b

A user is defined as someone who reported use as least once per week for at least one year.

We did not observe an association with ibuprofen use (19.0% of cases and 17.9% of controls) but did observe inverse associations for other NSAIDs (5.6% of cases and 8.5% of controls; OR = 0.66; 95% CI 0.51–0.87) and for COX-2 inhibitors (5.0% of cases and 7.9% of controls; OR = 0.59; 95% CI 0.45–0.79) (Table 2). The latter associations attenuated after adjustment for education, length of time registered in the Mayo and other NHL risk factors, with only ever use of COX-2 inhibitors (OR = 0.70; 95% CI 0.51–0.96) but not use of other NSAIDs (OR = 0.78, 95% CI 0.58–1.05) remaining statistically significant. However, neither of these drug classes showed consistent trends with the duration of use or pill-years. These findings were largely consistent across subgroup analyses based on BMI, smoking and history of RA or OA, although they were stronger in men for use of other NSAIDs and stronger in women for use of COX-2 inhibitors (Table 3). In analysis by NHL subtypes, inverse associations for COX-2 inhibitors were strongest for follicular lymphoma and CLL/SLL, although the number of exposed cases was small and the test of heterogeneity by subtype was not statistically significant (Table 4). Use of ibuprofen or other nonaspirin NSAIDs was not associated with any of the NHL subtypes (Table 4).

Use of statins (32.4% of cases and 35.5% of controls) or other cholesterol-lowering drugs (6.4% of cases and 7.4% of controls) were not associated with NHL risk overall (Table 5) or in subtypes analysis (Table 4). When we modeled the joint use of low-dose aspirin and statins, the strongest inverse association was observed for low-dose aspirin use only, followed by use of both aspirin and statins; there was no association with statin use only and no evidence for any interaction of aspirin and statins on risk (Table 5). There were also null associations for a similar analysis modeling the joint use of regular or extra strength aspirin and statins with risk of NHL.

TABLE 5.

Association of statin, other cholesterol drug use and combination aspirin and statin use with NHL risk, Mayo Clinic Case-Control Study, 2002–2012

Basic modela Basic + SESb Basic + confoundersc
Variable Controls Cases OR 95% CI OR 95% CI OR 95% CI
 Never user 1410 1136 1.00 Reference 1.00 Reference 1.00 Reference
 Ever user 776 545 0.95 (0.83, 1.09) 0.93 (0.80, 1.08) 0.99 (0.85, 1.16)
 Duration of use, years
 <5 239 168 0.91 (0.73, 1.14) 0.88 (0.70, 1.12) 0.91 (0.71, 1.16)
 5–9 218 153 0.94 (0.75, 1.18) 0.94 (0.74, 1.21) 0.98 (0.76, 1.27)
 10 or more 257 166 0.90 (0.72, 1.12) 0.89 (0.71, 1.12) 0.98 (0.77, 1.25)
P-trend .27 .26 .76
Other cholesterol drugs
 Never use 1987 1549 1.00 Reference 1.00 Reference 1.00 Reference
 Ever use 159 106 0.92 (0.71, 1.20) 0.80 (0.60, 1.06) 0.97 (0.72, 1.31)
 Duration of use, years
 <5 59 44 0.94 (0.62, 1.42) 0.92 (0.60, 1.42) 0.96 (0.61, 1.51)
 5–9 33 22 0.95 (0.54, 1.68) 0.77 (0.42, 1.40) 1.22 (0.64, 2.32)
 10 or more 43 27 0.93 (0.56, 1.55) 0.72 (0.41, 1.25) 0.81 (0.44, 1.50)
P-trend .70 .14 .76
Joint use of low dose aspirind and statin
 Neither 1028 899 1.00 Reference 1.00 Reference 1.00 Reference
 Aspirin only 365 216 0.67 (0.55, 0.82) 0.66 (0.53, 0.81) 0.73 (0.59, 0.91)
 Both aspirin and statin 388 254 0.79 (0.65, 0.95) 0.77 (0.63, 0.94) 0.88 (0.71, 1.09)
 Statin only 374 278 0.96 (0.80, 1.16) 0.93 (0.76, 1.14) 0.96 (0.78, 1.18)
Joint use of regular or extra strength aspirind and statin
 Neither 1207 975 1.00 Reference 1.00 Reference 1.00 Reference
 Aspirin only 183 147 0.92 (0.72, 1.17) 0.93 (0.72, 1.20) 1.00 (0.77, 1.30)
 Both aspirin and statin 159 131 1.05 (0.81, 1.36) 1.02 (0.78, 1.34) 1.03 (0.78, 1.37)
 Statin only 596 408 0.92 (0.79, 1.08) 0.90 (0.76, 1.07) 0.99 (0.83, 1.18)
a

Adjusted for age, sex and residence.

b

Further adjusted for education and year of first registration at Mayo.

c

Further adjusted for education, family history of lymphoma, BMI, smoking history, alcohol use, RA and osteoarthritis.

d

A user is defined as someone who reported use as least once per week for at least one year.

4 |. DISCUSSION

The most robust result from this large, clinic-based case-control study was an inverse association of regular, sustained use of low-dose aspirin (≤162 mg/d) with NHL risk, with evidence for a stronger association with longer duration of use. These results did not appear to be confounded by education, year of first registration at Mayo or other NHL risk factors, and were observed for all major NHL subtypes except CLL/SLL, although not all were statistically significant. The inverse associations were stronger in women but still apparent, although not statistically significant, in men. In contrast, there was no evidence of associations for regular or extra-strength aspirin or ibuprofen, while inverse associations with COX-2 inhibitors or other nonaspirin NSAIDs attenuated after adjustment for potential confounding factors. There was no evidence of statins, alone or in combination with aspirin use, associated with NHL risk.

Strengths of our study included the large sample size; careful selection of the control group for the clinic-based cases; central pathology review to determine NHL subtypes; relatively detailed assessment of use of aspirin, other NSAIDs and statins; a comprehensive assessment of confounding and effect modification; and evaluation of NHL subtype-specific associations. We previously reported our control selection for this clinic-based case-control study had strong internal validity as well as external validity, including replication of major associations in the literature and risk factor distributions for controls comparable to population-based data.8

Limitations included self-report of all exposures, which lead to misclassification of unknown extent. Nondifferential misclassification of exposures would likely lead to lower study power. Differential recall bias by cases vs controls is also a possibility given that cases have a stronger incentive to ruminate on prior exposures, although these exposures are relatively recent in the epidemiologic literature, and one would hypothesize reporting of any aspirin use, not just low-dose aspirin, would have been subject to this potential bias. Also, B symptoms (fever, night sweats, and weight loss in the 6 months before diagnosis) affect 10% to 30% of NHL patients (varying by subtype) and could lead to increased use of antipyretics and the potential for differential recall bias of these agents. However, B symptoms occur within 6 months of diagnosis, and respondents were asked to exclude use in the two years before diagnosis and further, when we excluded cases with B symptoms our findings did not change.

Reverse causality is another potential bias with our study design, although we focused on regular, long-term use, which would not be expected to impact the associations with long-term low-dose aspirin use. Of more concern for the low-dose aspirin association is potential confounding by socioeconomic status and access or use of preventive health care. However, adjustment for education and year of first registration at Mayo if anything slightly strengthened the associations, although these variables are rather weak surrogates for these factors. Finally, the study population was almost exclusively white, and thus these results may not generalize to other racial/ethnic groups.

A meta-analysis5 of 17 studies (12 case-control and 5 cohort studies) found that the use of any aspirin (OR = 1.02, 95% CI 0.89–1.17) was not associated with overall NHL risk, and there was no evidence of effect medication by a variety of factors, including gender, study design (case-control vs cohort), source population (general population vs other), geographic region (USA vs other) and drug and confounder information source (administrative database vs other). No results were available for low-dose aspirin use. Furthermore, in the meta-analysis,5 aspirin use was not associated with DLBCL or follicular lymphoma, consistent with our results, but was inversely associated with CLL/SLL (OR = 0.70; 95% CI 0.54–0.91), which we did not observe. The latter finding was based on four studies1114 with a total of 777 CLL/SLL cases compared to 495 cases our study.

The same meta-analysis5 also reported a positive association for use of nonaspirin NSAIDs with overall NHL risk (OR = 1.33, 95% CI 1.11–1.60), which was stronger in females (OR = 1.41, 95% CI 1.01–1.96) than males (OR = 1.16, 95% CI 0.84–1.61). There were no significant associations for DLBCL, follicular or CLL/SLL, although data were limited. In contrast, we did not observe any associations with use of ibuprofen and although we did observe an inverse association with other nonaspirin NSAIDs, this association attenuated after adjustment for potential confounding factors and did not show consistent trends with duration of use and pill-years. An inverse association with use of COX-2 inhibitors did remain after adjustment, but there were no consistent trends with pills per day, duration of use, or pill-years. A population-based case-control study found an increased risk of regular use of COX-2 inhibitors with NHL risk (OR = 1.58, 95% CI 0.68–3.67),15 but was based on only three exposed cases. A nested case-control study from a primary care database found that regular use of COX-2 inhibitors for more than a year was associated with an increased risk of lymphoma (OR = 1.21, 95% CI 1.01–1.45), with greater risk for long-term use (OR = 1.70, 95% CI 1.21–2.40).16 Given the limited data, more studies will be needed to understand any potential association with COX-2 inhibitors in NHL.

Few studies have reported on low-dose aspirin use with NHL risk. Consistent with our results, the VITAL cohort (N = 235 NHL cases) showed a suggestive inverse association of low-dose aspirin use (HR = 0.75 for ≥4 days/week for ≥4 years vs no regular use, 95% CI 0.49–1.15) but not regular dose aspirin use (HR = 1.17, 95% CI 0.80–1.71).13 No results for NHL subtypes were available. In contrast, a Dutch population-based study17 that linked pharmacy data on long-term low-dose (≤100 mg/d) aspirin use with cancer registry data found no association with lymphoma (N = 256 cases; HR = 1.34 for >6 years duration vs no use, 95% CI 0.74–2.43); the specific subtypes included in the lymphoma group were not reported, nor were any NHL subtype specific results. Secondary analyses of randomized cardiovascular trials provide some evidence that daily aspirin use reduces the incidence of all cancers combined, cancer mortality and distant metastases, even at low doses (75–100 mg/d).18,19 In a pooled analysis of data on nonfatal and fatal cancers from 32 randomized controlled trials in primary prevention of vascular events, aspirin use was inversely associated with hematologic malignancies for 0 to 3 years (OR = 0.79, 95% CI 0.49–1.27) and >3 years (OR = 0.86, 95% CI 0.53–1.40) after randomization, although neither estimate was statistically significant.20 Across all follow-up, lymphoma incidence was reduced (25 vs 45 cases, P = .017; no OR reported). Thus, while these limited data are somewhat supportive of a protective effect of low-dose aspirin, clearly more data are needed.

Dose and duration of aspirin use are closely related to the intended clinical impact, ranging from 75 mg (antiplatelet) to 325 to 600 mg (analgesic) to 1.2 g (anti-inflammatory) per day. Our results implicate low-dose aspirin use and thus point to antiplatelet effects. At low doses, aspirin irreversibly inhibits COX-1 (via acetylation) but has little impact on COX-2 until higher doses. NSAIDs reversibly block COX-1 and COX-2, with COX-2 inhibitors selective for COX-2.21 COX-1 and COX-2 convert arachidonic acid into prostaglandins, thromboxanes and prostacyclins, and COX-1 is constitutively expressed in most tissues while COX-2 expression is induced by inflammation, wound healing and neoplasia. Our results add to a small but accumulating literature in support of the hypothesis that inhibition of platelet activation by low-dose aspirin may have both cardioprotective and anti-cancer effects, with the latter effects linked to impacts on pathways related to proliferation, apoptosis, angiogenesis and immune evasion.22 Furthermore, our results suggest that higher-dose aspirin, ibuprofen and statins, drugs that reduce inflammation (among other biologic effects), do not appear to lower lymphoma risk even though sustained inflammation seems to raise it overall or for certain NHL subtypes, although there was some, albeit weak, evidence of a potential protective effect of other nonaspirin NSAIDs beyond ibuprofen and COX-2 inhibitors.

A meta-analysis of 10 studies6 found that statin use was inversely associated with NHL risk overall (OR = 0.82, 95% CI 0.69–0.99) and for several NHL subtypes (only statistically significant for MZL), and results were consistent by study design (cohort vs case-control studies) and source population (general population vs hospital-based). However, the overall association attenuated after excluding statin use within one year of diagnosis (OR = 0.92, 95% CI 0.80–1.06). Our results, which excluded use in the 2 years before diagnosis, did not find any evidence for an overall association with NHL or any of the common NHL subtypes, consistent with the latter finding. A recent large, population-based case-control study (5541 cases including multiple myeloma and 27 315 controls) found an inverse association with ever use of a statin (excluding use 1 year before diagnosis) with risk of all NHL after adjustment for other medications and healthcare utilization (OR = 0.82, 95% CI 0.76–0.89), but no clear association with dose or duration of use. In analyses by subtype, inverse associations were observed for DLBCL, multiple myeloma, and other B-cell NHL. In secondary analysis, the association appeared to be restricted to high potency statin and lipophilic statins.23 Our study could not address the type of statin used. Furthermore, we did not find any associations with other cholesterol lowering drugs. Serum cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein and low-density lipoprotein levels were found to be lower in lymphoma cases compared to controls in the 10 years before diagnosis, most pronounced 3 to 4 years before diagnosis,24 suggesting that low cholesterol levels could be a preclinical marker of lymphoma and introduce bias if not excluding exposures before diagnosis of lymphoma. We also did not observe an interaction of statin use with aspirin, as hypothesized based mainly from laboratory data or human data from studies of gastrointestinal cancers.7

5 |. CONCLUSION

In summary, our study supports the concept that regular use of aspirin at a dose that is able to inhibit platelet activity but does little to suppress inflammation reduces the likelihood of developing NHL, while use of higher dose aspirin, other NSAIDs or statins does not. Larger multi-institutional studies would be helpful to confirm this finding, along with mechanistic studies of low-dose aspirin in the context of lymphomagenesis.

What’s new.

Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and statin drugs may protect against the development of non-Hodgkin lymphoma, but data are limited, particularly for subtypes of the disease. In this large case-control study, regular use of low-dose aspirin was inversely associated with risk of non-Hodgkin lymphoma and most non-Hodgkin lymphoma subtypes. There was no association with use of regular/extra-strength aspirin, ibuprofen, other NSAIDs, or cholesterol-lowering drugs. Beyond the potential of low-dose aspirin in the primary prevention of non-Hodgkin lymphoma, these data point to a role of anti-platelet or other effects of low-dose aspirin in lymphomagenesis that warrants follow-up.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We thank Sondra Buehler for her editorial assistance. This work was supported by the National Institutes of Health (grant numbers R01 CA92153 and P50 CA97274).

Abbreviations:

BMI

body mass index

CI

confidence intervals

CLL

chronic lymphocytic leukemia

CVD

cardiovascular disease

DLBCL

diffuse large B-cell lymphoma

HL

Hodgkin lymphoma

MZL

marginal zone lymphoma

NHL

non-Hodgkin lymphoma

NSAIDs

non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs

OA

osteoarthritis

OR

odds ratio

RA

rheumatoid arthritis

SLL

small lymphocytic lymphoma

USPSTF

United States Preventive Services Task Force

Footnotes

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

The authors declared no potential conflicts of interest.

DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT

The data that support the findings of our study are available on request from the corresponding author.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Siegel RL, Miller KD, Fuchs HE, Jemal A. Cancer Statistics, 2021. CA Cancer J Clin. 2021;71:7–33. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Cerhan JR, Vajdic CM, Spinelli JJ. The non-Hodgkin lymphomas. In: Thun MJ, Linet MS, Cerhan JR, et al. , eds. Schottenfeld and Fraumeni Cancer Epidemiology and Prevention. 4th ed. New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 2018:767–796. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Bibbins-Domingo K Aspirin use for the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease and colorectal cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement. Ann Intern Med. 2016;164:836–845. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Seewaldt VL. Aspirin and chemoprevention—have we arrived? JAMA Oncol. 2018;4:1668–1669. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Ye X, Casaclang N, Mahmud SM. Use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and risk of non-Hodgkin lymphoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hematol Oncol. 2015;33:176–186. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Ye X, Mneina A, Johnston JB, Mahmud SM. Associations between statin use and non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) risk and survival: a meta-analysis. Hematol Oncol. 2017;35:206–214. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Xiao H, Yang CS. Combination regimen with statins and NSAIDs: a promising strategy for cancer chemoprevention. Int J Cancer. 2008;123:983–990. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Cerhan JR, Fredericksen ZS, Wang AH, et al. Design and validity of a clinic-based case-control study on the molecular epidemiology of lymphoma. Int J Mol Epidemiol Genet. 2011;2:95–113. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Swerdlow SH, Campo E, Harris NL, et al. WHO classification of tumours of the haematopoietic and lymphoid tissues. In: Bosman FT, Jaffe ES, Lakhani SR, et al., eds. World Health Organization Classification of Tumours. Lyon, France: IARC Press; 2008. [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Hosmer DW Jr, Lemeshow S. Applied Logistic Regression. 2nd ed. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons; 2000. [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Baker JA, Weiss JR, Czuczman MS, Menezes RJ, Ambrosone CB, Moysich KB. Regular use of aspirin or acetaminophen and risk of non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Cancer Causes Control. 2005;16:301–308. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Teras LR, Gapstur SM, Patel AV, et al. Aspirin and other nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and risk of non-hodgkin lymphoma. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2013;22:422–428. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Walter RB, Milano F, Brasky TM, White E. Long-term use of acetaminophen, aspirin, and other nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and risk of hematologic malignancies: results from the prospective Vitamins and Lifestyle (VITAL) study. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29:2424–2431. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Erber E, Lim U, Maskarinec G, Kolonel LN. Common immune-related risk factors and incident non-Hodgkin lymphoma: the multiethnic cohort. Int J Cancer. 2009;125:1440–1445. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Flick ED, Chan KA, Bracci PM, Holly EA. Use of nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs and non-Hodgkin lymphoma: a population-based case-control study. Am J Epidemiol. 2006;164:497–504. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Vinogradova Y, Coupland C, Hippisley-Cox J. Exposure to cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitors and risk of cancer: nested case-control studies. Br J Cancer. 2011;105:452–459. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Hollestein LM, van Herk-Sukel MP, Ruiter R, et al. Incident cancer risk after the start of aspirin use: results from a Dutch population-based cohort study of low dose aspirin users. Int J Cancer. 2014;135:157–165. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Rothwell PM, Fowkes FG, Belch JF, et al. Effect of daily aspirin on long-term risk of death due to cancer: analysis of individual patient data from randomised trials. Lancet. 2011;377:31–41. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Rothwell PM, Wilson M, Price JF, Belch JFF, Meade TW, Mehta Z. Effect of daily aspirin on risk of cancer metastasis: a study of incident cancers during randomised controlled trials. Lancet. 2012;379:1591–1601. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Rothwell PM, Price JF, Fowkes FG, et al. Short-term effects of daily aspirin on cancer incidence, mortality, and non-vascular death: analysis of the time course of risks and benefits in 51 randomised controlled trials. Lancet. 2012;379:1602–1612. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Alfonso L, Ai G, Spitale RC, Bhat GJ. Molecular targets of aspirin and cancer prevention. Br J Cancer. 2014;111:61–67. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Thun MJ, Jacobs EJ, Patrono C. The role of aspirin in cancer prevention. Nature Rev Clin Oncol. 2012;9:259–267. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Ye X, Zhang G, Righolt C, et al. Associations between statin use and risk of non-Hodgkin lymphomas by subtype. Int J Cancer. 2018;143:971–979. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Alford SH, Divine G, Chao C, et al. Serum cholesterol trajectories in the 10 years prior to lymphoma diagnosis. Cancer Causes Control. 2018;29:143–156. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES