Skip to main content
Scientific Reports logoLink to Scientific Reports
. 2021 Jun 10;11:12280. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-91881-1

Hydrothermally synthesized nanostructured LiMnxFe1−xPO4 (x = 0–0.3) cathode materials with enhanced properties for lithium-ion batteries

Dung V Trinh 1, Mai T T Nguyen 1, Hue T M Dang 1, Dung T Dang 1, Hang T T Le 1, Huynh T N Le 2, Hoang V Tran 1, Chinh D Huynh 1,
PMCID: PMC8192943  PMID: 34112910

Abstract

Nanostructured cathode materials based on Mn-doped olivine LiMnxFe1−xPO4 (x = 0, 0.1, 0.2, and 0.3) were successfully synthesized via a hydrothermal route. The field-emission scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS) analyzed results indicated that the synthesized LiMnxFe1−xPO4 (x = 0, 0.1, 0.2, and 0.3) samples possessed a sphere-like nanostructure and a relatively homogeneous size distribution in the range of 100–200 nm. Electrochemical experiments and analysis showed that the Mn doping increased the redox potential and boosted the capacity. While the undoped olivine (LiFePO4) had a capacity of 169 mAh g−1 with a slight reduction (10%) in the initial capacity after 50 cycles (150 mAh g−1), the Mn-doped olivine samples (LiMnxFe1−xPO4) demonstrated reliable cycling tests with negligible capacity loss, reaching 151, 147, and 157 mAh g−1 for x = 0.1, 0.2, and 0.3, respectively. The results from electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) accompanied by the galvanostatic intermittent titration technique (GITT) have resulted that the Mn substitution for Fe promoted the charge transfer process and hence the rapid Li transport. These findings indicate that the LiMnxFe1−xPO4 nanostructures are promising cathode materials for lithium ion battery applications.

Subject terms: Chemistry, Materials science, Physics

Introduction

The production and storage of new and clean energy are two major challenges that face humanity to stop the depletion of natural resources. In modern life, a wide range of systems such as portable electronic devices, computers, phones, cameras, and electric vehicles require stable and safe electrical energy. Such diversity in the electronics market compels the development of different electrochemical systems such as non-flammable batteries, superconductors, and other types of batteries15. Since 1970, the phosphorus-olivine structure has been tapped as a potential material for Li-ion batteries610. In particular, lithium iron phosphate (LiFePO4) and lithium manganese phosphate (LiMnPO4) are some of the most studied among transition metal oxide cathode materials due to their high theoretical capacity (~ 170 mAh g−1), inherent chemical stability, increased safety due to their lower explosion risk from overcharging, better thermal stability, and lower material cost1114. However, the electronic conductivity (δ) and Li-ion diffusion coefficient (DLi) of LiFePO4 and LiMnPO4 are on the low end; for example, δLiFePO4 = 10–8–10–9 S cm−1 and δLiMnPO4 = 10–10 S cm−112,1416. Due to the disadvantage of these materials’ conductivity on electronics and ion transport, there exists a major constraint to commercial applications of these materials17,18. To mitigate these issues, three approaches are typically considered: (i) coating carbon on the surface of olivine to improve the electron transfer process9,12,1922; or (ii) fully or partly substituting of Fe by a 3d-transition metals (such as Mn, Ni or Co)8,9,18,2326. Previous works reported that cation mixing in LiMnxFe1−xPO4 orthophosphates is a great trade-off between the valuable capacity of LiFePO4 and the high potential of LiMnPO4 (voltage of oxidation pair compared with Li+/Li)2729. These studies also shown that doping transition metal cations into LiFePO4 or LiMnPO4 causes a narrowing of the energy gap, which may improve the electrical conductivity of this material3,29. (iii) The Li-ion diffusion coefficient (DLi) of olivine cathode materials also can be improved by reducing the particle size of the olivines to nanoscale, or changing their particle shapes to nanorod, nanoplates or nanorectangular sheets1,13,20,27,3032. In addition, the electrochemical efficiency in olivine phosphate cathode materials also strongly depend on the prepared techniques solid-state reactions1,33, sol–gel methods13,34, reactions from hydrothermal routes11,24,31,32,3538 or microwave plasma chemical vapor deposition19. Among these methods, the hydrothermal synthesis is a facile water-based precipitation technique that enables the control of the nucleation and development of the crystal.

In this work, we improve the chemical properties by partly substation Fe by Mn, nanosizing of particles size and carbon coating of the original olivine. In which, the nanostructured of Mn doped olivine LiMnxFe1−xPO4 (x = 0, 0.1, 0.2, and 0.3) were synthesized by a facile hydrothermal route, and the as-prepared olivines were coated with carbon through pyrolysis. Electrochemical studies showed that the olivines were capable of delivering a reversible capacity around 160 mAh g−1 at a current density of C/10 in the voltage range of 2.5–4.3 V (vs. Li+/Li). The improving on the kinetics of Li transport in these olivines were found and also discussed.

Experimental

The chemicals Mn(NO3)2 (≥ 99 wt%), FeSO4·7H2O (≥ 99 wt%), LiOH (≥ 98 wt%), NH3 solution (30 wt%), H3PO4 (≥ 85%), citric acid monohydrate (C6H8O7·H2O, ≥ 99.5 wt%), polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF), ethylene carbonate (EC, 98 wt%), and dimethyl carbonate (DMC, ≥ 99 wt%) were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich. All the other chemicals were of analytical grade and used without further purification. All the aqueous solutions were prepared with deionized water (DI water, 18.2 MΩ.cm) for all the experiments.

Synthesis of olivine samples

A mixture of H3PO4, Mn(NO3)2, FeSO4·7H2O, and C6H8O7·H2O were dissolved into 50 mL DI water under N2 atmosphere at 1:9, 2:8, and 3:7 molar ratios of Mn:Fe. Then, 20 mL of 0.5 M LiOH was dropped into the mixture at a 3:1 ratio of Li+:PO43−. The NH3 solution was dropped into the final mixture to adjust the pH to 6–6.5. The final mixture was stirred for 30 min at 60–80 °C to form the sol. The sol was transferred to the autoclave at 180 °C for 12 h. The precipitation was collected by filtering, washing, and drying at 95 °C for 24 h.

Characterizations and methods

The X-ray diffraction spectra were recorded on a D5005-SIEMENS diffractometer with Cu-Kα radiation (λ = 1.54056 Å). The synthesized olivines were observed using a Hitachi FE-SEM S-4800 field-emission scanning electron microscope coupled with an Oxford 300 EDX analysis system. The micro-Raman spectra were recorded on a LABRAM-1B spectrophotometer (Jobin Yvon, France). The electrochemical properties of the synthesized olivines were evaluated by cyclic voltammetry (CV) at a scan rate of 1 mV s−1, galvanostatic charge/discharge tests, and electrochemical impedance spectroscopy by using a VMP3 apparatus (BioLogic, France) in the frequency range 5 mHz to 105 Hz and 10 mV peak-to-peak excitation signal.

Devices preparation

The synthesized olivine powders were mixed with carbon black as a conductive agent, polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) as binder in the ratio of 90:5:5, respectively, in a porcelain mortar and pestle. The prepared mixtures were coated onto a 0.1 mm aluminium sheet, dried at 120 °C in an oven for 12 h, and pressed on a press machine to create a thickness of 20 μm. The electrodes were then formed to circular plates with a diameter of 1.6 cm on a stamping machine. Coin-cells CR-2032 were assembled in an argon-filled glove box with an anode of lithium metal. The electrolyte solutions were 1 M LiPF6 in a mixture of ethylene carbonate (EC) and dimethyl carbonate (DMC) at a volumetric ratio of 2:1.

Results and discussion

Structural and morphological characterizations

The XRD spectra of the synthesized olivine samples (Fig. 1A) show a pure and very well crystallized single olivine phase without impurity (e.g., MnO2, Li2O, and Fe2O3). All the diffraction peaks were identified in an orthorhombic structure with a space group of Pnma (JCPDS 81-1173)14,27. In the olivine phase, the atoms are located at 4a for lithium, 4c for iron, 4c for phosphorous, and 4c and 8a for oxygen. The Mn substitute of Fe is at the 4c site. The lattice parameters are calculated by the Celref program and detailed in Table 1. The lattice expansion of the Mn-doped olivine samples depended on the degree of Mn substitution as well as the larger ionic radius of Mn2+ (rMn2+ = 0.08 nm > rFe2+ = 0.074 nm)14,27.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

(A) X-ray diffraction patterns and (B) Raman spectra of olivine samples: (a) LiFePO4; (b) LiMn0.1Fe0.9PO4; (c) LiMn0.2Fe0.9PO4 and (d) LiMn0.3Fe0.7PO4, respectively. These figures have been presented using OriginLab Software, ver.6.0 (https://www.originlab.com).

Table 1.

Lattice parameters of Mn-doped olivine samples.

Samples a (Å) b (Å) c (Å) V (Å3) Average crystalline size (nm)
LiFePO4 10.342 6.021 4.699 292.60 19.5
LiMn0.1Fe0.9PO4 10.330 6.012 4.702 292.01 22.5
LiMn0.2Fe0.8PO4 10.374 6.038 4.711 295.09 21.4
LiMn0.3Fe0.7PO4 10.390 6.048 4.718 296.47 21.0

The broadening of the diffraction peaks was attributed to the nanocrystallinity of the samples. The average crystalline size is calculated from the full width at half maximum (FWHM) through the Debye–Scherrer equation32:

dhkl=k·λβ·cosθ, 1

where dhkl is the average particle size, k is the constant depending on the crystallite shape (0.9), λ is the wavelength of the copper Kα X-ray radiation, β is the FWHM of the most intense peak (in rad), and θ is the diffraction angle. The crystallite size average can be estimated around 20 nm for all samples. This sub-micron size could indicate fast kinetics of lithium insertion due to a shortening of the lithium pathway for diffusion. The Raman spectra of three samples LiMn0.1Fe0.9PO4, LiMn0.2Fe0.8PO4 and LiMn0.3Fe0.7PO4 at high frequency 1000–2000 cm−1 (Fig. 1B) confirms the successful carbon coating on surface olivines from the pyrolysis process. The Raman spectrum showed the finger-print band of coated carbon through two characteristic peaks at 1351 cm−1 (D-band) and 1570 cm−1 (G-band), respectively. This result confirm the successfully coated carbon onto olivine surface22,39. The SEM image in Fig. 2 shows that the synthesized olivine LiMnxFe1−xPO4 samples crystallized with uniform size. The SEM of the original olivine LiFePO4 sample (Fig. 2a) shows LiFePO4 as consisting of spherical-like particles with a narrow particle size distribution in range from 200 to 400 nm. When Mn is doped into LiMnxFe1−xPO4, the particle size strongly reduces and the samples became more porous see Fig. 2b–d. It can be seen that particle size decreased with increasing Mn. In particular, the particle size of LiMn0.3Fe0.7PO4 is around 50 nm (Fig. 2d). The EDX spectra of the three Mn-doped samples (Fig. 3) showed the indicators of Mn, Fe, P, and O and confirmed the stoichiometric relationship between Mn:Fe (Table 2) was similar to the desired composition.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

SEM images of synthesized olivine samples: (a) LiFePO4; (b) LiMn0.1Fe0.9PO4; (c) LiMn0.2Fe0.8PO4 and (d) LiMn0.3Fe0.7PO4.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

EDS spectra of Mn-doped olivine samples (a) LiMn0.1Fe0.9PO4; (b) LiMn0.2Fe0.8PO4 and (c) LiMn0.3Fe0.7PO4.

Table 2.

Elemental composition of the Mn-doped olivines determined by SEM–EDX.

Elements keV LiMn0.1Fe0.9PO4 LiMn0.2Fe0.8PO4 LiMn0.3Fe0.7PO4
Atom% Mn/Fe Atom% Mn/Fe Atom% Mn/Fe
Oxygen 0.525 63.58 0.12:0.88 62.34 0.19:0.81 64.79 0.26:0.72
Phosphorus 2.013 16.11 17.20 14.03
Manganese 5.894 2.46 3.84 5.55
Ferrous 6.398 17.85 16.61 15.63

Electrochemical measurements

The CVs of the LiMnxFe1−xPO4 (x = 0, 0.1, 0.2, and 0.3) samples at a scan rate of 1 mV s−1 are shown in Fig. 4A. The original olivine LiFePO4 was measured over a voltage range of 3–4 V while the Mn-doped olivines were scanned at a wider range of 2.5–4.5 V. As can be seen from the CVs, the traditional reversible peak of the Fe3+/Fe2+ couple at 3.45–3.55 V appeared in the obtained voltammograms. With a greater degree of Mn substitution, the redox peak in the high voltage region (~ 4 V) becomes more observable. On the other hand, Mn doping into the original olivine can also lead to a slight shift in the Fe-redox potential, which will be discussed further in cycling test section. The Nyquist plots of the EIS for the LiMnxFe1−xPO4 (x = 0, 0.1, 0.2, and 0.3) samples (Fig. 4B) exhibited three regions: (i) a “quasi” semi-circle in the high-medium frequency corresponding to the charge-transfer; (ii) a straight line 45° from the real axis in low frequency region (in frequency range from 1 Hz to 0.1 Hz) demonstrating the Warburg impedance, and (iii) at very low frequencies (f < 10–3 Hz) the phase angle is increases due to the finite diffusion process5,40. It is observed that Mn doping is helpful for decreasing charge transfer resistance in olivine, which suggests fast electron transfer as well as stability in cycling performance.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

(A) Cyclic voltammograms at a scan rate of 5 mV s−1 and (B) corresponding Nyquist plots of electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) of synthesized olivine samples: (a) LiFePO4; (b) LiMn0.1Fe0.9PO4; (c) LiMn0.2Fe0.8PO4 and (d) LiMn0.3Fe0.7PO4. Experimental conditions are described in the text. These figures have been presented using OriginLab Software, ver.6.0 (https://www.originlab.com).

The galvanostatic cycling tests at a constant current of 0.1 C in the potential range of 2.5–4.3 V are shown in Fig. 5A. It is well known that the LiFePO4 profile drops rapidly to plateau at a voltage of 3.39 V when discharging and leaps to 3.45 V when charging. This profile can be considered as a two-phase mechanism between the LiFePO4 phase and FePO4 phase (Fig. 5A, curve a). However, the Mn substitution in olivine leads a significant change in the cycling profile (Fig. 5A, curve b to curve d). The discharge curve of the lowest Mn-doped sample falls slowly with a light bend over 3.7 V and reaches the main plateau at 3.41 V, while the reverse plateau appears at 3.47 V. It was reasonable that the Mn-redox signal of LiMn0.1Fe0.9PO4 was hardly seen in the obtained voltammogram. In the other Mn-doped samples, the cycling profiles are demonstrated by a well-defined plateau at over 3.45 V and a short one at around 3.90 V. It was recognized that increasing the degree of Mn doping prolongs the capacity in the high voltage region and shortens it in the lower region. Indeed, the capacity was boosted from 20 mAh g−1 for LiMn0.2Fe0.8PO4 to nearly 40 mAh g−1 for LiMn0.3Fe0.7PO427,31.

Figure 5.

Figure 5

(A) Typical charge/discharge curves and (B) cycling performance upon 50 cycles of olivine samples at a rate 0.1 C: (a) LiFePO4; (b) LiMn0.1Fe0.9PO4; (c) LiMn0.2Fe0.8PO4 and (d) LiMn0.3Fe0.7PO4. These figures have been presented using OriginLab Software, ver.6.0 (https://www.originlab.com).

On the other hand, it was observed that Mn doping also lead to shifts in the redox potential as well as an expansion of the polarization. Notably, at mid-capacity (~ 75 mAh g−1), the discharge potential shifted towards 50 mV for the Fe-redox potential (from 3.40 to 3.45 V) with an increase in the degree of Mn doping and the polarization considerably increased from 50 mV (for LiFePO4) to 63 mV (for LiMn0.3Fe0.7PO4). This finding is consistent with the obtained cyclic voltammograms and can be interpreted as (i) the Mn is more electropostitive than Fe and (ii) the Mn substitution of Fe can be expected to strengthen the Fe–O covalence, which raises the Fe2+/Fe3+ redox energy and shifts the redox voltage of the Fe2+/Fe3+ couple higher25.

The cycling performance of the olivines are presented in Fig. 5B. The initial capacity of LiFePO4 reached 169 mAh g−1, which was close to the theoretical capacity, however 10% of the initial capacity was lost after 50 cycles with a final capacity of 152 mAh g−1. For the Mn-doped olivines, LiMnxFe1−xPO4 (x = 0.1, 0.2, and 0.3), there was negligible capacity loss and their final capacity reached 151, 147, and 157 mAh g−1, respectively. The capacity loss can be interpreted by the release of Mn during the charge–discharge process41. The Coulombic retentions were over 95% during the cycling test, which indicated a reversible Li-intercalation into the olivine hosts.

The apparent chemical coefficient of diffusion of lithium (DLi) is a key parameter that evaluates the lithium transport into the intercalation hosts, which can be determined by the galvanostatic intermittent titration technique (GITT). This method imposes a constant current through the cell for a certain time interval42,43. The open circuit voltage (OCV) curve was measured with a constant discharge rate of C/50 for 30 min followed by an OCV relaxation period of 5 h to the equilibrium voltage. The diffusion process within the host was assumed to obey Fick’s second law of diffusion, and under galvanostatic conditions, it obeys the following Eq. (2):

D=4πVMS·F·zA2I0.dEdx/dEdt2, 2

where VM is the molar volume of the host, S is the active surface of the electrode, F is Faraday’s constant (F = 96,500 C mol−1), zA is the charge of the mobile species (zLi = 1), Io is the magnitude of the current pulse, dE/dx is the slope of the OCV curve, and dE/dt1/2 was directly obtained from the measurement of the voltage as a function of time during the constant current flux. The galvanostatic curve described the phase transition between LiFePO4–FePO4 can be divided in three segments: (i) a quickly dropping voltage as a solid solution segment for Li content below 0.1, (ii) a phase transition segment with Li content ranging from 0.1 to 0.9, and (iii) other solid solution segments for Li content below 144,45. The DLi in the solid solution segment is usually more rapid than those in the phase transition region due to the slope dE/dx. Indeed, the phase transition is characterized by a flat voltage that leads to a small dE/dx. Figure 6 demonstrates the evolution of DLi as a function of lithium content in the olivines. It is observed that the synthesized olivines have a DLi in the range of 10–17–10–15 cm2 s−1 at the phase transition with Li content ranging from 0.2 to 0.8 for LiFePO4 and LiMn0.1Fe0.9PO4 and from 0.35 to 0.8 for the two other olivines. Moreover, the evolution of DLi in LiMn0.2Fe0.8PO4 and LiMn0.3Fe0.7PO4 shows a peak at xLi = 0.1 due to a short plateau of the redox couple Mn2+/Mn3+, which is consistent with the galvanostatic curve. Except at the phase transition, the DLi of the Mn-doped olivines were significantly higher than the original olivine, which can be explained by enlarged lattice due to Mn substitution as well as a 1D channel in the (010) plane that is favourable for Li transport. To compare, A. Kumar20 has reported a DLi = 1.28 × 10–15 cm2 s−1 and DLi = 7.13 × 10–14 cm2 s−1 for pure LiFePO4 and carbon coated LiFePO4, respectively. Tang28 has also reported that the DLi values were depended onto Li content in LiFePO4 olivine in range from 9.0 × 10−18 to 4.0 × 10−14 cm2 s−1. Hong46 has obtained diffusivity value of 0.70 × 10−11 cm2 s−1 (measured at x = 0.01 for for Li1−xFePO4) using GITT method. Based on electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) calculating, Gao19 ported a DLi was in the range of 10−15–10−9 cm2 s−1 for LiFePO4/carbon nanoparticles synthesized by microwave plasma chemical vapor deposition (MPCVD) method. Briefly, these above results on DLi values of LiMxFe1−xPO4 olivines demonstrated that the DLi values are strongly depended on composition of doped M metals and their content, Li content, particles size of olivines, method for preparation, carbon coating and also calculating methods as well. It can be seen that the obtained DLi values in our results are comparable to previous reports on LiFePO4 olivines cathode materials19,20,28,46,47, which were determined by electrochemical methods such as CV, EIS, GITT20,28,4850.

Figure 6.

Figure 6

Evolution of DLi as a function of lithium content in olivine samples: (a) LiFePO4; (b) LiMn0.1Fe0.9PO4; (c) LiMn0.2Fe0.8PO4 and (d) LiMn0.3Fe0.7PO4. These figures have been presented using OriginLab Software, ver.6.0 (https://www.originlab.com).

Conclusion

The Mn-doped olivine LiMnxFe1−xPO4 (x = 0, 0.1, 0.2, and 0.3) were successfully synthesized via the hydrothermal route. Characterization results demonstrated that as synthesized Mn-doped olivines presented an orthorhombic structure with lattice parameters that agreed with prior reports. The electrochemical measurements demonstrate that all Mn-doped olivine samples show better performance than that of original LiFePO4. In which of synthesized Mn-doped olivines, the LiMn0.3Fe0.7PO4 exhibits the superior cycling stability with the retention of 100% initial capacity (157 mAh g−1) upon 50 cycles. Following the EIS and GITT results, the Mn-substitutions benefits the electron-transfer process as well as the Li-transport in 1D channel (010) plan due to the enlargement of lattice parameter. The olivine LiMnxFe1−xPO4, therefore, can lead to the development of high-performance lithium-ion batteries.

Acknowledgements

We acknowledge the Energy Storage Materials Lab in Dankook University (Chungnam, Republic of Korea) for the help with electrochemical measurements. This research was funded by Vietnam National Foundation for Science and Technology Development (NAFOSTED) under Grant number 104.03-2017.349.

Author contributions

D.V.T.: Investigation. M.T.T.N.: Investigation. H.T.M.D.: Investigation, D.T.D.: Data curation. H.T.T.L.: Formal analysis. H.T.N.L.: Formal analysis. H.V.T.: writing—review & editing. C.D.H.: Supervision, writing—review & editing.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Footnotes

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

  • 1.Elkhalfaouy R, Elknidri H, Belaabed R, Addaou A, Laajeb A, Lahsini A. Synthesis and characterization of LiMnPO4 material as cathode for Li-ion batteries by a precipitation method and solid-state blending. J. Mater. Environ. Sci. 2016;7:40–49. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Kumar PR, Venkateswarlu M, Satyanarayana N. Three-dimensional lithium manganese phosphate microflowers for lithium-ion battery applications. J. Appl. Electrochem. 2012;42:163–167. doi: 10.1007/s10800-012-0383-7. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Zhou F, Kang K, Maxisch T, Ceder G, Morgan D. The electronic structure and band gap of LiFePO4 and LiMnPO4. Solid State Commun. 2004;132:181–186. doi: 10.1016/j.ssc.2004.07.055. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Nazir A, Le HTT, Kasbe A, Park C-J. Si nanoparticles confined within a conductive 2D porous Cu-based metal–organic framework (Cu3(HITP)2) as potential anodes for high-capacity Li-ion batteries. Chem. Eng. J. 2021;405:126963. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2020.126963. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Vu NH, Le HTT, Hoang VH, Dao V-D, Huu HT, Jun Y-S, Im WB. Highly N-doped, H-containing mesoporous carbon with modulated physicochemical properties as high-performance anode materials for Li-ion and Na-ion batteries. J. Alloys Compd. 2021;851:156881. doi: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2020.156881. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Chung S-Y, Bloking JT, Chiang Y-M. Electronically conductive phospho-olivines as lithium storage electrodes. Nat. Mater. 2002;1:123–128. doi: 10.1038/nmat732. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Padhi AK, Nanjundaswamy KS, Goodenough JB. Phospho-olivines as positive-electrode materials for rechargeable lithium batteries. J. Electrochem. Soc. 1997;144:1188–1194. doi: 10.1149/1.1837571. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Liang L, Jiang J, Jiang F, Hu G, Cao Y, Peng Z, Du K. An ordered olivine-type LiCoPO4 layer grown on LiNi0.6Mn0.2Co0.2O2 cathode materials applied to lithium-ion batteries. J. Alloys Compd. 2017;695:1993–1997. doi: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2016.11.034. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Wang L, Li Y, Wu J, Liang F, Zhang K, Xu R, Wan H, Dai Y, Yao Y. Synthesis mechanism and characterization of LiMn0.5Fe0.5PO4/C composite cathode material for lithium-ion batteries. J. Alloys Compd. 2020;839:155653. doi: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2020.155653. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Deng Z, Wang Q, Peng D, Liu H, Chen Y. Fast precipitation-induced LiFe0.5Mn0.5PO4/C nanorods with a fine size and large exposure of the (010) faces for high-performance lithium-ion batteries. J. Alloys Compd. 2019;794:178–185. doi: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2019.04.184. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Bao L, Xu G, Wang J, Zong H, Li L, Zhao R, Zhou S, Shen G, Han G. Hydrothermal synthesis of flower-like LiMnPO4 nanostructures self-assembled with (010) nanosheets and their application in Li-ion batteries. CrystEngComm. 2015;17:6399–6405. doi: 10.1039/C5CE01253H. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Gaberscek M, Dominko R, Jamnik J. Is small particle size more important than carbon coating? An example study on LiFePO4 cathodes. Electrochem. Commun. 2007;9:2778–2783. doi: 10.1016/j.elecom.2007.09.020. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Winkowska M, Strachowski LLT, Wasiucionek M. Optimization of synthesis of single phase nanostructured LiFePO4 materials. Materiały Elektroniczne (Electron. Mater.) 2016;44:4–8. [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Yan D, Zhao Y, Dong Y, Liang Z, Lin X. Synthesis, characterization, and electrochemical properties of Li2Mn1−xFex (PO3)4 cathode material for lithium-ion batteries. J. Solid State Electrochem. 2016;20:337–344. doi: 10.1007/s10008-015-3048-8. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Hu J, Xie J, Zhao X, Yu H, Zhou X, Cao G, Tu J. Doping effects on electronic conductivity and electrochemical performance of LiFePO4. J. Mater. Sci. Technol. 2009;25:405–409. doi: 10.1179/174328408X269259. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Wang C, Hong J. Ionic/electronic conducting characteristics of LiFePO4 cathode materials: The determining factors for high rate performance. Electrochem. Solid State Lett. 2007;10:A65–A69. doi: 10.1149/1.2409768. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Prosini PP, Lisi M, Zane D, Pasquali M. Determination of the chemical diffusion coefficient of lithium in LiFePO4. Solid State Ion. 2002;148:45–51. doi: 10.1016/S0167-2738(02)00134-0. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Yang C-C, Hsu Y-T, Karuppiah C, Shih J-Y, Wu Y-S, Wu Z-H, Lue SJ. Synthesis and characterization of LiFe0.5Mn0.3Co0.2PO4/C composite material for high-voltage Li-ion battery application. J. Alloys Compd. 2018;750:945–958. doi: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2018.04.098. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Gao C, Zhou J, Liu G, Wang L. Lithium-ions diffusion kinetic in LiFePO4/carbon nanoparticles synthesized by microwave plasma chemical vapor deposition for lithium-ion batteries. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2018;433:35–44. doi: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2017.10.034. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Kumar A, Thomas R, Karan NK, Saavedra-Arias JJ, Singh MK, Majumder SB, Tomar MS, Katiyar RS. Structural and electrochemical characterization of pure and nanocomposite C-cathodes for lithium ion rechargeable batteries. J. Nanotechnol. 2009;2009:176517. doi: 10.1155/2009/176517. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Huynh LTN, Nguyen HHA, Tran TTD, Nguyen TTT, Nguyen TMA, La TH, Tran VM, Le MLP. Electrode composite LiFePO4@Carbon: Structure and electrochemical performances. J. Nanomater. 2019;2019:2464920. doi: 10.1155/2019/2464920. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Doeff MM, Wilcox JD, Kostecki R, Lau G. Optimization of carbon coatings on LiFePO4. J. Power Sources. 2006;163:180–184. doi: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2005.11.075. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Huynh LTN, Le PPN, Trinh VD, Tran HH, Tran VM, Le MLP. Structure and electrochemical behavior of minor Mn-doped olivine LiMnxFe1−xPO4. J. Chem. 2019;2019:5638590. doi: 10.1155/2019/5638590. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Devaraju MK, Honma I. Hydrothermal and solvothermal process towards development of LiMPO4 (M = Fe, Mn) nanomaterials for lithium-ion batteries. Adv. Energy Mater. 2012;2:284–297. doi: 10.1002/aenm.201100642. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Muraliganth T, Manthiram A. Understanding the shifts in the redox potentials of olivine LiM1−yMyPO4 (M = Fe, Mn Co, and Mg) solid solution cathodes. J. Phys. Chem. C. 2010;114:15530–15540. doi: 10.1021/jp1055107. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Rui X, Zhao X, Lu Z, Tan H, Sim D, Hoon Hng H, Yazami R, Lim TM, Yan Q. Olivine-type nanosheets for lithium ion battery cathodes. ACS Nano. 2013;7:5637–5646. doi: 10.1021/nn4022263. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Hong J, Wang F, Wang X, Graetz J. LiFexMn1−xPO4: A cathode for lithium-ion batteries. J. Power Sources. 2011;196:3659–3663. doi: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2010.12.045. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Tang K, Yu X, Sun J, Li H, Huang X. Kinetic analysis on LiFePO4 thin films by CV, GITT, and EIS. Electrochim. Acta. 2011;56:4869–4875. doi: 10.1016/j.electacta.2011.02.119. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Chen T-C, Lin R-H. Effects of metal doping on properties of LiFePO4 cathode material by first-principle calculation. Int. J. Mater. Eng. 2015;5:121–124. doi: 10.5923/j.ijme.20150505.0. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Fujimoto D, Lei Y, Huang Z-H, Kang F, Kawamura J. Synthesis and electrochemical performance of LiMnPO4 by hydrothermal method. Int. J. Electrochem. 2014;2014:768912. doi: 10.1155/2014/768912. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Kosova NV, Podgornova OA, Gutakovskii AK. Different electrochemical responses of LiFe0.5Mn0.5PO4 prepared by mechanochemical and solvothermal methods. J. Alloys Compd. 2018;742:454–465. doi: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2018.01.242. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Qin X, Wang X, Xiang H, Xie J, Li J, Zhou Y. Mechanism for hydrothermal synthesis of LiFePO4 platelets as cathode material for lithium-ion batteries. J. Phys. Chem. C. 2010;114:16806–16812. doi: 10.1021/jp104466e. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Yamada A, Chung SC, Hinokuma K. Optimized LiFePO4 for lithium battery cathodes. J. Electrochem. Soc. 2001;148:A224–A229. doi: 10.1149/1.1348257. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Yang J, Xu JJ. Nonaqueous sol–gel synthesis of high-performance LiFePO4. Electrochem. Solid State Lett. 2004;7:A515–A518. doi: 10.1149/1.1819893. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Yang S, Zavalij PY, Whittingham MS. Hydrothermal synthesis of lithium iron phosphate cathodes. Electrochem. Commun. 2001;3:505–508. doi: 10.1016/S1388-2481(01)00200-4. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Chen J, Whittingham MS. Hydrothermal synthesis of lithium iron phosphate. Electrochem. Commun. 2006;8:855–858. doi: 10.1016/j.elecom.2006.03.021. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Li L, Lu X, Chen W, Fang H. A new strategy to hydrothermally synthesize olivine phosphates. Chem. Commun. 2019;55:12092–12095. doi: 10.1039/C9CC05100G. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Chen J, Wang S, Whittingham MS. Hydrothermal synthesis of cathode materials. J. Power Sources. 2007;174:442–448. doi: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2007.06.189. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Doeff MM, Hu Y, McLarnon F, Kostecki R. Effect of surface carbon structure on the electrochemical performance of LiFePO4. Electrochem. Solid State Lett. 2003;6:A207–A209. doi: 10.1149/1.1601372. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Ho C, Raistrick ID, Huggins RA. Application of A-C techniques to the study of lithium diffusion in tungsten trioxide thin films. J. Electrochem. Soc. 1980;127:343–350. doi: 10.1149/1.2129668. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Huang W, Hu J, Yang L, Zhao W, Wang Z, Wang H, Guo Z, Li Y, Liu J, Yang K, Pan F. Revealing the degradation mechanism of LiMnxFe1–xPO4 by the single-particle electrochemistry method. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 2019;11:957–962. doi: 10.1021/acsami.8b18930. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Weppner W, Huggins RA. Electrochemical investigation of the chemical diffusion, partial ionic conductivities, and other kinetic parameters in Li3Sb and Li3Bi. J. Solid State Chem. 1977;22:297–308. doi: 10.1016/0022-4596(77)90006-8. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Wen CJ, Boukamp BA, Huggins RA, Weppner W. Thermodynamic and mass transport properties of "LiAl". J. Electrochem. Soc. 1979;126:2258–2266. doi: 10.1149/1.2128939. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Allen JL, Jow TR, Wolfenstine J. Analysis of the FePO4 to LiFePO4 phase transition. J. Solid State Electrochem. 2008;12:1031–1033. doi: 10.1007/s10008-007-0459-1. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Li D, Zhou H. Two-phase transition of Li-intercalation compounds in Li-ion batterie. Mater. Today. 2014;17:451–463. doi: 10.1016/j.mattod.2014.06.002. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Hong L, Li L, Chen-Wiegart Y-K, Wang J, Xiang K, Gan L, Li W, Meng F, Wang F, Wang J, Chiang Y-M, Jin S. Two-dimensional lithium diffusion behavior and probable hybrid phase transformation kinetics in olivine lithium iron phosphate. Nat. Commun. 2017;8:1194. doi: 10.1038/s41467-017-01315-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Santos-Mendoza IO, Vázquez-Arenas J, González I, Ramos-Sánchez G, Castillo-Araiza CO. Revisiting electrochemical techniques to characterize the solid-state diffusion mechanism in lithium-ion batteries. Int. J. Chem. React. Eng. 2019;17:20180095. doi: 10.1515/ijcre-2018-0095. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Chen Y, Wang L, Anwar T, Zhao Y, Piao N, He X, Zhu Q. Application of galvanostatic intermittent titration technique to investigate phase transformation of LiFePO4 nanoparticles. Electrochim. Acta. 2017;241:132–140. doi: 10.1016/j.electacta.2017.04.137. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Zhu Y, Wang C. Galvanostatic intermittent titration technique for phase-transformation electrodes. J. Phys. Chem. C. 2010;114:2830–2841. doi: 10.1021/jp9113333. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Lee Y-S, Ryu K-S. Study of the lithium diffusion properties and high rate performance of TiNb6O17 as an anode in lithium secondary battery. Sci. Rep. 2017;7:16617. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-16711-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Scientific Reports are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES