Skip to main content
Metabolic Engineering Communications logoLink to Metabolic Engineering Communications
. 2015 Oct 31;2:132–136. doi: 10.1016/j.meteno.2015.10.001

Production of 3-hydroxypropionic acid from glucose and xylose by metabolically engineered Saccharomyces cerevisiae

Kanchana R Kildegaard a, Zheng Wang b,c,1, Yun Chen b,c, Jens Nielsen a,b,c, Irina Borodina a,
PMCID: PMC8193239  PMID: 34150516

Abstract

Biomass, the most abundant carbon source on the planet, may in the future become the primary feedstock for production of fuels and chemicals, replacing fossil feedstocks. This will, however, require development of cell factories that can convert both C6 and C5 sugars present in lignocellulosic biomass into the products of interest. We engineered Saccharomyces cerevisiae for production of 3-hydroxypropionic acid (3HP), a potential building block for acrylates, from glucose and xylose. We introduced the 3HP biosynthetic pathways via malonyl-CoA or β-alanine intermediates into a xylose-consuming yeast. Using controlled fed-batch cultivation, we obtained 7.37±0.17 g 3HP L−1 in 120 hours with an overall yield of 29±1% Cmol 3HP Cmol−1 xylose. This study is the first demonstration of the potential of using S. cerevisiae for production of 3HP from the biomass sugar xylose.

Abbreviations: 3HP, 3-hydroxypropionic acid; XR, xylose reductase; XDH, xylitol dehydrogenase; XK, xylulokinase; MCR, malonyl-CoA reductase; ACC, acetyl-CoA reductase; ALD, aldehyde dehydrogenase; ACS, acetyl-CoA synthase; PDC, pyruvate decarboxylase; PYC, pyruvate carboxylase; BAPAT, β-alanine-pyruvate aminotransferase; PAND, aspartate 1-decarboxylase; HIBADH, 3-hydroxyisobutyrate dehydrogenase; HPDH, 3-hydroxypropionate dehydrogenase

Keywords: Metabolic engineering, Biorefineries, 3-hydroxypropionic acid, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Xylose utilization

Highlights

  • 3HP is a potential building block for acrylic plastics and biodegradable polyesters.

  • We developed S. cerevisiae strains for production of 3HP from glucose and xylose.

  • 3HP pathway via β-alanine resulted in the highest 3HP titers on xylose.

  • 7.4±0.2 g 3HP L−1 was obtained with a yield of 29±1% Cmol 3HP Cmol−1 xylose.

  • Demonstration of the potential of using the biomass sugar xylose to produce 3HP.

1. Introduction

In order to maintain and improve our current living standard it is necessary with a transition to a sustainable fossil-free society, and this will require novel technologies for production of energy, fuels and chemicals. In the absence of strong governmental and regulatory support, the emerging bio-based technologies must compete with the established petrochemical industry. Nevertheless during the last decade we have witnessed positive developments in the bio-based industry: appearance of the first commercial-scale 2nd generation ethanol biorefineries and of commercial plants for bulk bio-based chemicals, such as lactic acid, farnesene, isobutanol, 1,4-butadiene, etc. (see Borodina and Nielsen (2014), Li and Borodina (2014) and Van Dien (2013) for references and details). With increasing bio-based production it will not be possible to solely use sugars from food crops as a feedstock, and there is therefore a need for creating novel cell factories that can produce chemicals from lignocellulosic materials, which contain both pentoses (C5) and hexoses (C6).

3-Hydroxypropionic acid (3HP) is an attractive bio-based platform chemical as it can be chemically converted into acrylic acid, acrylic esters and amides, and hereby enables sustainable production of superabsorbent polymers, plastics, paints, etc. The market for acrylic acid and its esters is estimated to reach USD 18.8 billion by 2020 (“Acrylic Acid Market (Acrylate Esters, Glacial Acrylic Acid & Others) for Superabsorbent polymers and Surface Coatings, Adhesives and Sealants, Textiles, Plastic Additives and Printing Ink Applications-Global Industry Analysis, Size, Share, Growth and Forecast, 2012–2018,”). 3HP has been produced biologically from glycerol by Klebsiella pneumoniae and Escherichia coli strains, from glucose at neutral pH by E. coli (see Kumar et al. (2013) for references and details), and lately also from glucose at lower pH by yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae (Borodina et al., 2015, Chen et al., 2014, Jensen et al., 2014a). As 3HP is an organic acid with pKa of 4.51, running the fermentation at low pH reduces the downstream process cost and amount of waste, and a yeast-based process is therefore preferable. Furthermore, yeast has an advantage of being tolerant to inhibitors in biomass hydrolysate and can be engineered for tolerant to high concentration of 3HP (Kildegaard et al., 2014). Here we explored the production of 3HP from d-xylose by engineered S. cerevisiae.

2. Materials and methods

2.1. Strains and chemicals

The xylose utilizing S. cerevisiae strain was described before (Scalcinati et al., 2012). Recombinant yeast strains were selected and maintained on synthetic drop-out agar without tryptophan and with 2% xylose as the sole carbon source. Chemicals were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich. 3HP was purchased from Tokyo Chemical Industry Co. (TCI). Pfu Turbo DNA polymerase was from Agilent Technologies Inc.

2.2. Strain construction

The yeast strains and plasmids are listed in Table 1. The primers and biobricks are listed in Appendix A, Appendix A, respectively. The xylose-consuming CMB.GS010 strain was made auxotrophic for uracil, histidine and leucine as following. First, the ORF of URA3 gene was replaced with the KanMX cassette using homologous recombination. As the KanMX cassette is flanked by LoxP sites, the KanMX cassette was removed by Cre-LoxP-mediated selection marker loop-out as described previously (Jensen et al., 2014b). Next, the ORF of LEU2 and HIS3 genes were replaced by the URA3 from Kluyveromyces lactis (KlURA3) and KanMX cassettes, respectively. Finally, the KlURA3 and KanMX cassettes were looped-out using Cre-LoxP system to generate the final strain ST2488. The yeast transformations were performed using the lithium acetate protocol (Gietz and Schiestl, 2007). The elimination of the selection markers was verified by PCR in addition to phenotypic test. To construct 3HP-producing strains, expression vectors carrying the genes involved in 3HP biosynthesis were linearized with NotI and then transformed into ST2488. The transformants were selected on synthetic drop-out xylose medium without uracil, histidine, leucine and tryptophan.

Table 1.

Strains and plasmids used in this study.

Plasmids Description Reference
pUG6 LoxP-KanMX-LoxP Euroscarf
pUG72 LoxP-KlURA3-LoxP Euroscarf
pCfB380 pX-3-LoxP-KlLEU2-SEacsL641P<-PTEF1-PPGK1->ALD6 Jensen et al. (2014a)
pCfB382 pX-4-LoxP-SpHiS5-PDC1<-PTEF1 Jensen et al. (2014a)
pCfB474 pTY4-KlURA3-ACC1**<-PTEF1-PPGK1->CaMCR Jensen et al. (2014a)
pCfB743 pXI-1-LoxP-KlLEU2-PYC1<-PTEF1-PPGK1->PYC2 Borodina et al. (2015)
pCfB799 pTY4-TcPanD<-PTEF1 Borodina et al. (2015)
pCfB800 pX-4-LoxP-SpHiS5-BcBAPAT<-PTEF1-PPGK1->EcYdfG Borodina et al. (2015)
pCfB801 pX-4-LoxP-SpHiS5-BcBAPAT<-PTEF1-PPGK1->PpHIBADH Borodina et al. (2015)


 

 


Strains Genotype Reference
CEN.PK 113-7D (ST1) MATa URA3 HIS3 LEU2 TRP1 MAL2-8c SUC2 Peter Kötter (Johann Wolfgang Goethe-University Frankfurt, Germany
CMB.GS010 CEN.PK 113-3C/pRS314-X123 (PTDH3-PsXYL1, PTDH3-PsXYL2, PTDH3-PsXYL3 TRP1) evolved for grown on xylose Scalcinati et al. (2012)
ST2488 CMB.GS010 TRP1 ura3∆ his3∆ leu2∆ This study
ST2546 ST2488/pCfB380/ pCfB382/ pCfB474 This study
ST2547 ST2488/pCfB743/ pCfB800/ pCfB799 This study
ST2808 ST2488/pCfB743/ pCfB801/ pCfB799 This study

2.3. Cultivation of yeast

For testing 3HP production, the strains were cultivated in mineral medium with 20 g L−1 glucose or xylose as carbon-source in 96-deep well plate as described earlier (Borodina et al., 2015).

Controlled fermentations were carried out according to the following protocol. Batch fermentations were performed in the mineral media as previously described (Verduyn et al., 1992) containing 50 g L−1 of xylose, 5 g L−1 of (NH4)2SO4, 3 g L−1 of KH2PO4, 0.5 g L−1 of MgSO4·7H2O, 0.05 mL of antifoam, 1 mL of a vitamin solution and 1 mL of a trace metal solution. The medium used to prepare the pre-cultures in shake-flasks was the same as above with the following modifications: no antifoam, 7.5 g L−1 of (NH4)2SO4, 14.4 g L−1 of KH2PO4 and the pH was adjusted to 6.5 with NaOH before autoclaving. Each fermenter was inoculated with an initial OD600 of 0.5 using a pre-culture obtained by cultivating a single colony of the desired strain in 30 mL of mineral medium in a 100 mL shake-flask at 200 rpm in an orbital shaker kept at 30 °C. The batch and fed-batch fermentations were performed in 2.7-L DASGIP Bioreactors (Dasgip, Jülich, Germany). The working volume for batch fermentations was 1 L, the temperature set-point was controlled at 30 °C, the airflow was set at 1 vvm (gas volume flow per unit of liquid volume per minute), the pH was maintained at 5 by feedback controlled addition of 10% NH4OH, the dissolved oxygen was kept above 30% of saturation by feedback control of the stirring speed from 600 rpm until a maximum of 1200 rpm. The concentration of O2 and CO2 in exhaust gas was monitored by a DASGIP® GA4 exhaust analyzer. The fed-batch cultures were initiated as batch cultures using 20 g L−1 xylose. An exponential feeding rate of xylose was designed to keep the growth rate at 0.03 h−1.

2.4. Analysis of biomass and metabolites

The growth was measured by optical density at 600 nm and cell dry weight. Extracellular metabolites, such as 3HP, glucose, xylose, ethanol, acetate, glycerol, and succinate, were analyzed by HPLC as reported in (Borodina et al., 2015).

3. Results and discussion

3.1. Engineering 3HP pathways into the xylose-consuming yeast

The xylose consuming yeast CMB.GS010 was constructed previously by transforming CEN.PK 113–3C with the centromeric vector pRS314-X123 carrying xylose reductase (XR), xylitol dehydrogenase (XDH) and xylulokinase (XK) from Pichia stipitis under control of strong constitutive promoter TDH3 and evolving the resulting strain on mineral medium with xylose as the sole carbon source (Scalcinati et al., 2012). The evolved strain had an increased maximal specific growth rate compared with the non-evolved parent strain, i.e. 0.18 h−1 compared with 0.02 h−1, and showed a 15-fold increase in the xylose consumption rate. As the CMB.GS010 strain has no selectable markers available for further genetic modifications, three auxotrophic mutations (ura3Δ, leu2Δ and his3Δ) were made in strain CMB.GS010 to obtain strain ST2488.

In ST2488, we introduced two different pathways for 3HP production, one via malonyl-CoA (P-I) and another via β-alanine (P-II) (Jensen et al., 2014a; Borodina et al., 2015) (Fig. 1). The strain with P-I (ST2546) carried overexpression cassettes for 5 genes: malonyl-CoA reductase from Chloroflexus aurantiacus MCR, phosphorylation insensitive variant of acetyl-CoA carboxylase ACC1S659A, S1157A (ACC1**), aldehyde dehydrogenase (ALD6), acetyl-CoA synthase from Salmonella enterica (SEACS), and pyruvate decarboxylase (PDC1). MCR and ACC1** were integrated into TY4 retrotransposon regions using degradation-tagged URA3 selection marker as described in (Borodina et al., 2015) to ensure multiple integration events. The pathway P-II either used a NADH-dependent route (P-IIa) or a NADPH-dependent route (P-IIb). The strain with P-IIa (ST2808) carried over-expression cassettes for 5 genes: pyruvate carboxylase (PYC1, PYC2), β-alanine-pyruvate aminotransferase from Bacillus cereus (BcBAPAT), aspartate 1-decarboxylase from Triboleum castanium (TcPAND), and NADH-dependent 3-hydroxyisobutyrate dehydrogenase (HIBADH) from Pseudomonas putida (PpHIBADH). In the strain with P-IIb (ST2547) the last gene was replaced by NADPH-dependent 3-hydroxypropionate dehydrogenase (HPDH) from E. coli (EcYdfG). In the strains with P-IIa and P-IIb pathways, all the genes were integrated into the genome in a single copy, with exception of TcPAND gene, which was inserted into TY4 regions. Because the resulting transformants may have different copy numbers of the vectors integrating into different TY4 regions, we chose to screen 15 transformants of each strain for 3HP production on glucose and xylose. The average titer on glucose was highest for the strain with P-I (1.44±0.14 g L−1), however this strain had a very poor 3HP production on xylose (0.17±0.11 g L−1) (Fig. 2). The 3HP titers for the P-IIa strain were comparable on glucose and xylose (0.60±0.03 and 0.49±0.16 g L−1) and the specific yield on xylose was nearly twice as high as that on glucose. The best titer was obtained for strain with P-IIb pathway, 1.00±0.06 g L−1 on glucose and 1.84±0.23 g L−1 on xylose and the specific yield on xylose was nearly 2.7-fold higher than that on glucose. We speculate that the reason for low 3HP production from xylose via P-I is the lack of overflow metabolism (Crabtree effect), where a large part of the carbon is channeled via pyruvate decarboxylase into ethanol. As was shown in a previous study (Borodina et al., 2015), 3HP accumulation largely occurs during the ethanol consumption phase during cultivation on glucose, however only very limited amounts of ethanol are produced during growth on xylose. The absence of the Crabtree effect had however a positive effect on the 3HP production via the β-alanine pathway, which begins with the anaplerotic reaction from pyruvate to oxaloacetate, and hence competes for pyruvate with pyruvate decarboxylase.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Overview of the pathway for xylose utilization and 3HP biosynthesis. P-I denotes a pathway towards 3HP via malonyl-CoA intermediate, P-II is a pathway towards 3HP via β-alanine intermediate.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

3HP production from glucose or xylose by the engineered S. cerevisiae strains, carrying biosynthetic pathways towards 3HP via malonyl-CoA or β-alanine intermediates. (A) 3HP titers and (B) 3HP yields from 15 individual transformants that were cultivated on both substrates for each strain. The average values and standard deviations are shown.

3.2. Production of 3HP in controlled batch and fed-batch reactors

The best 3HP-producing strains ST2547 and ST2808 were fermented in batch mode on mineral medium with xylose as the sole carbon source (Fig. 3). The pH was maintained at 5 during the fermentation. In batch mode about 50 g L−1 of xylose was consumed in 140 hours, resulting in 6.09±0.33 g L−1 3HP by ST2547, compared with 2.3±0.09 g L−1 3HP by ST2808. Ethanol concentration did not exceed 1 g L−1 at any point of fermentation. ST2547 strain was further characterized in fed-batch mode. In fed-batch mode after 120 hours of fermentation, the 3HP concentration reached 7.37±0.17 g L−1, with an overall yield of 29±1% C-mol 3HP C-mol−1 xylose. As xylose does not elicit the Crabtree effect, the batch or fed-batch mode of sugar addition did not have a significant impact on the final titer or yield.

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

Physiological characterization of 3HP-producing strains. (A) Batch fermentation of strain ST2808. (B) Batch fermentation of strain ST2547. (C) Fed-batch fermentation of strain ST2547. The strains were grown on mineral medium with xylose as the sole carbon source at pH 5. Each fermentation was carried out in duplicates. Here a representative graph is shown (the replica data is provided in Supplementary Fig. 1).

4. Conclusions

3HP production via two different pathways has been established in the evolved xylose-utilizing yeast, where the 3HP pathway via β-alanine resulted in higher product titer on xylose than the pathway via malonyl-CoA. The study lays the basis for development of the yeast strain for producing 3HP from lignocellulosic feedstocks at low pH.

Acknowledgment

The authors would like to acknowledge the Novo Nordisk Foundation and the Knut and Alice Wallenberg Foundation for funding.

Footnotes

Appendix A

Supplementary data associated with this article can be found in the online version at doi:10.1016/j.meteno.2015.10.001.

Appendix A. Supplementary material

Supplementary material

mmc1.docx (96.4KB, docx)

References

  1. Borodina I., Kildegaard K.R., Jensen N.B., Blicher T.H., Maury J., Sherstyk S., Schneider K., Lamosa P., Herrgård M.J., Rosenstand I., Öberg F., Forster J., Nielsen J. Establishing a synthetic pathway for high-level production of 3-hydroxypropionic acid in Saccharomyces cerevisiae via β-alanine. Metab. Eng. 2015;27:57–64. doi: 10.1016/j.ymben.2014.10.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Borodina I., Nielsen J. Advances in metabolic engineering of yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae for production of chemicals. Biotechnol. J. 2014;9:609–620. doi: 10.1002/biot.201300445. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Chen Y., Bao J., Kim I.-K., Siewers V., Nielsen J. Coupled incremental precursor and co-factor supply improves 3-hydroxypropionic acid production in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Metab. Eng. 2014;22:104–109. doi: 10.1016/j.ymben.2014.01.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Gietz R.D., Schiestl R.H. High-efficiency yeast transformation using the LiAc/SS carrier DNA/PEG method. Nat. Protoc. 2007;2:31–34. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2007.13. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Jensen, N., Borodina, I., Chen, Y., Maury, J., Kildegaard, K., Forster, J., Nielsen, J., 2014a. Microbial production of 3-hydroxypropionic acid. WO Patent Application, 2014/198831 A1
  6. Jensen N.B., Strucko T., Kildegaard K.R., David F., Maury J., Mortensen U.H., Forster J., Nielsen J., Borodina I. EasyClone: method for iterative chromosomal integration of multiple genes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. FEMS Yeast Res. 2014;14:238–248. doi: 10.1111/1567-1364.12118. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Kildegaard K.R., Hallström B.M., Blicher T.H., Sonnenschein N., Jensen N.B., Sherstyk S., Harrison S.J., Maury J., Herrgård M.J., Juncker A.S., Forster J., Nielsen J., Borodina I. Evolution reveals a glutathione-dependent mechanism of 3-hydroxypropionic acid tolerance. Metab. Eng. 2014;26:57–66. doi: 10.1016/j.ymben.2014.09.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Kumar V., Ashok S., Park S. Recent advances in biological production of 3-hydroxypropionic acid. Biotechnol. Adv. 2013;31:945–961. doi: 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2013.02.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Li M., Borodina I. Application of synthetic biology for production of chemicals in yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. FEMS Yeast Res. 2014;15:1–12. doi: 10.1111/1567-1364.12213. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Scalcinati G., Otero J.M., Van Vleet J.R.H., Jeffries T.W., Olsson L., Nielsen J. Evolutionary engineering of Saccharomyces cerevisiae for efficient aerobic xylose consumption. FEMS Yeast Res. 2012;12:582–597. doi: 10.1111/j.1567-1364.2012.00808.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Van Dien S. From the first drop to the first truckload: commercialization of microbial processes for renewable chemicals. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 2013;24:1061–1068. doi: 10.1016/j.copbio.2013.03.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Verduyn C., Postma E., Scheffers W.A., Van Dijken J.P. Effect of benzoic acid on metabolic fluxes in yeasts: a continuous-culture study on the regulation of respiration and alcoholic fermentation. Yeast. 1992;8:501–517. doi: 10.1002/yea.320080703. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary material

mmc1.docx (96.4KB, docx)

Articles from Metabolic Engineering Communications are provided here courtesy of Elsevier

RESOURCES