Abstract
This cohort study examines ipsilateral axillary nodal reactivity seen on positron emission tomographic and computed tomographic imaging after intramuscular administration of the coronavirus 2019 mRNA vaccines.
Intramuscular coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) vaccinations could induce ipsilateral axillary lymph node reactivity that may be falsely attributed to malignant abnormality, prompting unwarranted interventions, or it may be falsely attributed to vaccination rather than cancer, potentially delaying cancer care. We aimed to investigate Moderna and Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine-related nodal reactivity on 18F-flurodeoxyglocose (FDG) positron emission tomographic (PET)/computed tomographic (CT) scans.
Methods
All patients (n = 1290) who underwent FDG-PET/CT scans between December 11, 2020 and March 1, 2021 at the Yale New Haven Hospital were screened (eMethods in the Supplement) for COVID-19 vaccination. Sixty-eight patients who received at least 1 dose of COVID-19 vaccine were analyzed. Sixty-seven of 68 patients had PET/CT for oncologic indications, none of which was adenopathy ipsilateral to the vaccination site. Intensity of lymph node activity was graded by Deauville criteria1; activity more intense than mediastinal blood pool was considered reactive.
Results
Reactive ipsilateral axillary lymph nodes developed in 9 of these 68 patients (13%), 7 women and 2 men. After the first vaccine dose, in 2 of 41 patients (5%) and after the second vaccine dose, in 7 of 27 patients (26%) (Fisher exact P = .02; odds ratio [OR], 0.15; CI, 0.01-0.89), 3 (15%) for the Pfizer vaccine and 4 (57%) for the Moderna vaccine (Table 1). Median time from the second vaccine dose to the FDG-PET/CT scan was 10 days in patients with nodal reactivity and 12 days in those without nodal reactivity (Table 2). On CT scan, axillary lymph nodes were enlarged (≥10 mm short axis) in 1 of 59 patients (2%) with nonreactive nodes and in 5 of 9 patients (56%) with reactive nodes (Fisher exact P < .001; OR, 0.02; 95% CI, 0.01-0.19). Overall, FDG-activity was seen at the injection site in 6 of 51 patients (12%) for Pfizer and 2 of 17 patients (12%) for Moderna vaccines.
Table 1. Patient Characteristics Grouped According to Ipsilateral-to-Injection-Site Axillary Nodal Reactivitya.
Parameter | No. (%) | |
---|---|---|
Nonreactive | Reactive | |
Patients | 59 (87) | 9 (13) |
Age, y | ||
Mean (SD) [range] | 76 (8) [53-89] | 69 (12) [46-83] |
<80 | 40 (68) | 7 (78) |
≥80 | 19 (32) | 2 (22) |
Sex (% women) | 29 (49) | 7 (78) |
Vaccine to PET scan time, median (range), d | 12 (1-47) | 10 (3-20) |
Vaccine type | ||
Pfizer | 47 (92) | 4 (8) |
Moderna | 12 (71) | 5 (29) |
Vaccine dose | ||
1st Dose, total | 39 (95) | 2 (5) |
2nd Dose total | 20 (74) | 7 (26) |
1st Dose, Moderna | 9 (90) | 1 (10) |
1st Dose, Pfizer | 30 (97) | 1 (3) |
2nd Dose, Moderna | 3 (43) | 4 (57) |
2nd Dose, Pfizer | 17 (85) | 3 (15) |
Absolute neutrophil count, ×1000/μLb | ||
Normal | 31 | 9 |
Abnormal (low) | 5 | 0 |
Abnormal (high) | 3 | 0 |
Not available | 17 | 3 |
Abbreviation: PET, positron emission tomography.
Nodes with activity greater than the mediastinal blood pool are classified as reactive.
Normal range, 1.0-11.0 × 1000/μL
Table 2. Distribution of Deauville Scores for First and Second Dose of Moderna and Pfizer Vaccines.
Activity scale | Moderna 1 | Moderna 2 | Pfizer 1 | Pfizer 2 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Deauville 1 | 6 | 1 | 22 | 13 |
Deauville 2 | 3 | 2 | 8 | 4 |
Deauville 3 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
Deauville 4 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
Deauville 5 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
Discussion
Axillary lymphadenopathy following intramuscular vaccine has been observed with influenza and human papilloma virus vaccines, and recently with COVID-19 mRNA vaccines.2,3,4 We found that ipsilateral axillary nodal reactivity occurred after the first vaccine dose in 2 patients (5%) and after the second vaccine dose in 7 (26%); 4 patients (57%) after the second dose of the Moderna vaccine and 3 (15%) after the second dose of the Pfizer vaccine. In the Moderna trial, axillary swelling and tenderness on patient survey was reported in 1322 (11.6%) patients after the first dose (567 [5%] placebo) and in 1654 (16%) after the second dose (444 [4.3%] placebo) of vaccine; in the Pfizer trial, only unsolicited reactions were recorded.5
18F-Flurodeoxyglocose–PET/CT is highly sensitive for detection of reactivity in nonenlarged or enlarged lymph nodes, explaining higher frequency of nodal reactivity in this study relative to the Moderna trial after the second dose. In the present study, only 5 patients (56%) with nodal reactivity on PET had nodal enlargement on CT findings. Increased nodal FDG uptake, presumably from an inflammatory immune response to the vaccine, was observed up to 32 days after vaccination in this cohort, harboring the potential risk of mimicking or masking malignant disease. Patients with cancer with a propensity for spread to ipsilateral axillary lymph nodes—breast cancer, melanoma, lymphomas—should have the COVID-19 vaccine in the axilla contralateral to the previously or potentially involved site. Nuclear medicine technologists should document vaccine site, date, type, and first vs second dose. In this cohort, ipsilateral axillary nodal activity was much less common after the first vaccine dose, and women were more likely to develop reactive nodes, an important implication for breast cancer imaging concordant with the statement issued by the Society of Breast Imaging.6
Limitations
This was a single institutional study with limited sample size and follow-up, comparing 2 COVID-19 vaccines available at Yale School of Medicine in early vaccination stage. However, the study was conducted by strict and reproducible PET and CT criteria, and provides a framework for the future studies in this field.
Conclusions
Ipsilateral axillary nodal reactivity is commonly seen after the intramuscular administration of the COVID-19 mRNA vaccines, more so after the second dose than after the first, and more commonly with the Moderna than the Pfizer vaccine.
References
- 1.Gallamini A, Barrington SF, Biggi A, et al. The predictive role of interim positron emission tomography for Hodgkin lymphoma treatment outcome is confirmed using the interpretation criteria of the Deauville five-point scale. Haematologica. 2014;99(6):1107-1113. doi: 10.3324/haematol.2013.103218 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Coates EE, Costner PJ, Nason MC, et al. ; VRC 900 Study Team . Lymph node activation by PET/CT following vaccination with licensed vaccines for human papillomaviruses. Clin Nucl Med. 2017;42(5):329-334. doi: 10.1097/RLU.0000000000001603 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Shirone N, Shinkai T, Yamane T, et al. Axillary lymph node accumulation on FDG-PET/CT after influenza vaccination. Ann Nucl Med. 2012;26(3):248-252. doi: 10.1007/s12149-011-0568-x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Özütemiz C, Krystosek LA, Church AL, et al. Lymphadenopathy in COVID-19 vaccine recipients: Diagnostic dilemma in oncology patients. Radiology. 2021;210275. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2021210275 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.CDC . Local Reactions, Systemic Reactions, Adverse Events, and Serious Adverse Events: Moderna COVID-19 Vaccine. Accessed April 7, 2021. https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/covid-19/info-by-product/moderna/reactogenicity.html
- 6.SBI . Recommendations for the Management of Axillary Adenopathy in Patients with Recent COVID-19 Vaccination. Accessed Aptil 7, 2021. https://www.sbi-online.org/Portals/0/Position%20Statements/2021/SBI-recommendations-for-managing-axillary-adenopathy-post-COVID-vaccination.pdf
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.