Skip to main content
PLOS ONE logoLink to PLOS ONE
. 2021 Jun 11;16(6):e0252844. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0252844

REM-related obstructive sleep apnea and vertigo: A retrospective case-control study

Po-Yueh Chen 1,2, Tzu-Ying Chen 3, Pin-Zhir Chao 2,3, Wen-Te Liu 2,4, Chyi-Huey Bai 5, Sheng-Teng Tsao 5, Yi-Chih Lin 2,3,5,*
Editor: Giannicola Iannella6
PMCID: PMC8195434  PMID: 34115792

Abstract

Background

In recent population-based case-control studies, sleep apnea was significantly associated with a higher incidence (hazard ratio, 1.71) of vertigo and the risk of tinnitus was found to increase 1.36 times in patients with sleep apnea. The possibility that obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) might affect neurotological consequences was not noticed, until studies using polysomnography (PSG) for these patients.

Objectives

The purpose of this study was to investigate the relationship between vertigo and OSA.

Methods

The collected data among patients from May 1st, 2018 to October 31th, 2018 at Shuang Ho Hospital. Eligibility criteria included an age older than 20 years, a diagnosis of obstructive sleep apnea. The diagnosis of OSA was defined as an oxygen desaturation index of at least 5, was established with the use of polysomnographic examination at hospital. Patients were excluded from the study if they had head injury, brain tumour, headache history and hearing loss. Patients who had vertigo were labeled as Vertigo group. In the other hand, patients who had no dizziness were labeled as control group. 58 patients were in the Vertigo group, and 113 were in the control group.

Results

After PSG examination, 58 patients who had vertigo, were diagnosed OSA (29 males, average age = 57.07 years old, BMI = 26.64, RDI = 24.69, ESS = 8.65), and 24 patients of them (41.3%) were REM-related OSA. Meanwhile, in the control group, 113 patients had OSA (92male, average age = 49.66 years old, BMI = 26.06, RDI = 35.19, ESS = 11.43), and 18 patients of them (15.9%) were REM-related OSA (Table 1). Therefore, patient who had vertigo, would have higher proportion of REM OSA (P<0.001).

Conclusions

The vertigo patients have a higher rate of REM-related OSA, and the acceptance rate to CPAP use is low. Further research is needed to explore novel therapeutic approaches, or combination of currently available non-CPAP therapies, in patients with REM OSA.

Introduction

Vertigo is common among the general adult population [1]. A national telephonic survey in Germany revealed that the lifetime prevalence, 1-year prevalence, and incidence of vestibular vertigo were 7.8%, 5.2%, and 1.5%, respectively [2]. A national survey in Taiwan revealed that the prevalence of vertigo was 3.13 cases per 100 adults and that the prevalence and recurrence of vertigo increased significantly with age (p < .001) [3]. Vertigo can affect the ability to perform daily activities and negatively impact health-related quality of life [2, 4].

A recent population-based case–control study, 5,025 newly diagnosed with sleep apnea patients from the National Health Insurance Research Database of Taiwan, has been demonstrated sleep apnea is significantly associated with a higher incidence (hazard ratio, 1.71) of vertigo [5]. Vertigo symptoms of Ménière’s disease patients with OSAS can be improved by CPAP therapy [6].

The possibility that obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) might have neurotological consequences was not noticed until patients were examined using polysomnography (PSG). OSA should be always suspected in elderly patients who show typical nighttime or daytime symptoms of sleep apnea. PSG is a necessary examination for the diagnosis of OSA in elderly patients [7].

OSA is a frequent disorder characterized by intermittent obstruction of the upper airway during sleep, occurring either during the rapid eye movement (REM) or nonrapid eye movement (NREM) stage. OSA may be predominantly a REM phenomenon in children and increasing in apnea severity may be secondary to changes in upper airway neuromotor control, changes in REM density [8], or upper airway muscle fatigue due to change in respiratory duty cycle [9]. During the REM stage, hypotonia of the upper airway muscles increases the risk for upper airway obstruction, and this is termed “REM-related OSA.” Recently, interest has increased in the study of this subtype of OSA. The prevalence of REM‐related OSA among patients with OSA undergoing PSG varies between 10% and 36% [10]. REM-related OSA may have worse cardiometabolic consequences than NREM-related OSA [4], and the current continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) adherence guidelines may exclude most patients with REM-related OSA needing treatment.

To date, the association between vertigo and REM-related OSA remains unclear. In this study, we aimed to investigate the relationship between vertigo with sleep disturbance and REM-related OSA.

Methods

Study design

In total, 171 patients visiting the otology clinic and sleep clinic of Shuang Ho Hospital, Taiwan, were recruited from May 2018 through October 2018. Eligibility criteria included age more than 20 years and a diagnosis of OSA. According to the third edition of the International Classification of Sleep Disorders (ICSD-3), OSA defined as PSG-determined obstructive respiratory disturbance index (RDI) ≥ 5 events/h associated with the typical symptoms of OSA (e.g., unrefreshing sleep, daytime sleepiness, fatigue or insomnia, awakening with a gasping or choking sensation, loud snoring, or witnessed apneas), or an obstructive RDI ≥ 15 events/h (even in the absence of symptoms). In addition to apneas and hypopneas index, the RDI includes respiratory effort-related arousals (RERAs) [11]. Patients with head injury, brain tumour, a history of headache, and hearing loss were excluded. We define vertigo group as patients who had two or more clinical visits due to vertigo within two years before the diagnosis of OSA. Besides, patients who experienced at least three months between two vertigo episodes. Fifty-eight patients were allocated to the vertigo group, and 113 patients who had no complaints of dizziness or vertigo within two years before the diagnosis of OSA were allocated to the control group.

Patient information collected consisted of age, gender, and body mass index (BMI). Daytime sleepiness was evaluated using the Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS). Data of other covariates, including respiratory disturbance index (RDI), NREM apnea–hypopnea index (AHI), REM AHI, apnea index, hypopnea index, sleep latency, N3 stage, REM stage, lowest oxygen saturation (LSAT), mean oxygen saturation (mean SAT), total sleep time with oxygen saturation below 90% (ST90), cumulative percentage of time spent at saturations below 90% (CT90), supine AHI, lateral AHI, mean heart rate (HR), arousal index, and periodic leg movement index (PLMI), were obtained through PSG. All of the PSG reports were scored by an experienced sleep technician and reviewed by a sleep medicine physician who was blinded to the study groups.

Statistical analysis

Continuous data are presented as mean ± standard deviation (SD) and were analyzed using Student’s t-test. Categorical data are presented as number (%) and were analyzed using the chi-square test. Fisher’s exact test was used if the expected value was less than 5. Logistic regression analysis was performed to calculate the odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI). A p value of < .05 was considered statistically significant. All the data were analyzed using SAS 9.4 (SAS Institute, Inc).

Ethical approval

The retrospective study of data from patients who diagnosed obstructive sleep apnea was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Taipei Medical University (IRB Number: N202009009), which waived the requirement for informed consent of the patients involved because the study was retrospective and did not violate their rights or adversely affect their welfare.

Results

Patient baseline characteristics of age, gender, BMI, and ESS score are presented in Table 1. The vertigo group had a greater number of female patients, older patients, and patients with lower ESS scores.

Table 1. Baseline characteristics of study participants.

Characteristics Total (N = 171) Control group (N = 113) Vertigo group (N = 58) p value
Age (years) 52.18 ± 14.72 49.66 ± 14.25 57.07 ± 14.50 .0017
Male patients, n/N (%) 120/171 (70.1) 92/113 (81.4) 29/58 (50.0) .0001
BMI 26.26 ± 4.06 26.06 ± 4.02 26.64 ± 4.15 .3781
ESS 10.54 ± 2.48 11.43 ± 1.89 8.65 ± 2.56 < .0001

*BMI, body mass index; ESS, Epworth Sleepiness Scale.

*Comparison of the control group and the vertigo group was performed the t-test to evaluate the difference; except the gender were performed the chi square test.

PSG results for all the groups are presented in Table 2. The findings demonstrated that the vertigo group had significantly lower RDI, NREM AHI, apnea index, hypopnea index, ODI, ST90, CT90, supine AHI, lateral AHI, and arousal index values but higher REM-related OSA (p = .0009) and LSAT (p = .0191) values.

Table 2. Polysomnography results of participants.

Characteristics Total (N = 171) Control group (N = 113) Vertigo group (N = 58) p value
RDI 31.63 ± 20.93 35.19 ± 21.00 24.69 ± 19.13 .0003
REM AHI 43.10 ± 21.16 44.48 ± 21.60 40.50 ± 20.23 .2496
NREM AHI 29.77 ± 22.15 33.88 ± 22.02 21.76 ± 20.29 < .0001
REM-related OSA, n/N (%) 43/171 (25.1) 18/113 (15.9) 24/58 (41.3) .0009
Apnea index 5.04 ± 7.58 6.02 ± 8.17 3.14 ± 5.89 .0123
Hypopnea index 26.18 ± 18.18 28.63 ± 18.58 21.39 ± 16.50 .0041
Sleep latency 25.13 ± 28.44 24.19 ± 28.19 26.97 ± 29.09 .3567
N3 stage 3.81 ± 6.69 4.34 ± 6.93 2.78 ± 6.11 .0785
REM stage 12.55 ± 6.48 12.17 ± 6.44 13.29 ± 6.54 .4539
ODI 28.67 ± 21.34 30.96 ± 22.06 24.22 ± 19.28 .0409
LSAT 82.41 ± 7.78 81.46 ± 8.07 84.26 ± 6.89 .0191
Mean SAT 94.89 ± 6.84 94.72 ± 8.33 95.21 ± 1.76 .1873
ST90 6.56 ± 17.08 7.94 ± 19.92 3.88 ± 8.88 .0260
CT90 2.39 ± 5.70 2.81 ± 6.42 1.57 ± 3.85 .0244
Supine AHI 37.26 ± 25.33 42.68 ± 25.10 26.51 ± 22.35 < .0001
Lateral AHI 22.47 ± 23.92 27.72 ± 24.76 12.20 ± 18.46 < .0001
Mean HR 65.31 ± 8.76 65.92 ± 9.39 64.12 ± 7.33 .2043
Arousal index 21.43 ± 12.21 22.99 ± 12.01 18.40 ± 12.13 .0020
PLMI 4.20 ± 11.28 3.48 ± 10.25 5.60 ± 13.03 .6775

*RDI, Respiratory disturbance index; ODI, oxygen desaturation index; ST90, sleep time with SpO(2) < 90%; CT90, cumulative time percentage with SpO(2) < 90%. LSAT, lowest oxygen saturation; mean SAT, mean oxygen saturation; PLMI, periodic leg movement index.

*Comparison of the control group and the vertigo group was performed the t-test to evaluate the difference.

Logistic regression analysis was performed to calculate the OR to predict the risk for REM-related OSA. The ORs of potential risk factors for REM-related OSA are presented (Fig 1). If the patient with OSA was a woman, had symptoms of vertigo and tinnitus, and had an ESS score of less than 10, then the OR was increased to 3.3, 3.73, and 11.51, respectively. Moreover, if the patient with OSA had all of the aforementioned risk factors, the OR was increased to 35.00.

Fig 1. Odds ratios of potential risk factors of REM-related OSA.

Fig 1

1: ref = male; 2: ref = non-vertigo; 3: ref = ESS>10; 4: ref = without any risk factors of female, vertigo or ESS≤ 10; OR, odds ratio.

Discussion

In this study, we found that patients with OSA and vertigo have a higher risk for REM-related OSA. Patients with sleep apnea appear to have an increased risk of vertigo [5]. The accumulation of several factors may increase the severity of OSA during the REM sleep phase. During the REM stage, it would decrease the muscle tone in the upper airway, especially was genioglossus because of acetylcholine-mediated inhibition. This causes the muscles surrounding the upper airway to collapse easily. Moreover, the hypoxic and hypercapnic ventilatory drives decrease during REM sleep. The severity of REM-related OSA is usually reflected by events that are more frequent, of longer duration, and that are associated with greater oxygen desaturation. The pathophysiological mechanism of REM-related OSA remains unclarified. However, classifying OSA into non-stage specific and REM-related OSA is critical to prevent cardiovascular complications. Previous studies have demonstrated that OSA during REM sleep may increase the risk for cardiovascular complications compared with OSA during NREM sleep [12]. In the present study, the REM duration was less than 15% of the total sleep time, resulting in lower average values of RDI, ODI, ST90, CT90, and arousal index in the REM-related OSA group. This finding is in line with the result of an earlier study, which demonstrated that REM‐related OSA was generally associated with lower arousal index values along with milder severity of OSA [10]. The reason for the vertigo group in our study demonstrating lower ESS scores could be the reduced severity of OSA in the NREM stage. This finding is in accordance with a previous study, which reported that an increase in NREM AHI, but not REM AHI, was associated with daytime sleepiness, as assessed by the multiple sleep latency test (MSLT) [13]. Additionally, even women reporting levels of daytime sleepiness similar to those reported by men are less likely to have an ESS score more than 10 [14]. Although it is unclear why these differences occur, it is possible that women have a different threshold for feeling sleepy or complain differently about sleepiness compared with men. The notion that REM-related OSA may be related to increased risks of cardiovascular, endocrine, and neurocognitive outcomes is based on at least 2 possibilities [15]. First, REM-related OSA may induce intermittently severe disease, and severe disease, even in limited doses, is adequate to increase the risks associated with adverse outcomes. Second, REM sleep constitutes the phase during which the brain and other end organs are particularly vulnerable; this can be attributed to the physiological features of the brain, including its precise neurochemical milieu, degree of neuronal synchrony, frequency of cortical local field potential oscillations, and autonomic tone, all of which aggregate to influence heart rate and rhythm and control blood flow to end organs.

Approximately 15% of patients with Meniere disease were diagnosed as having OSA [16]. Although OSA may significantly affect neurotological consequences, few studies have examined this topic. Improvement of sleep in patients with OSA is often associated with a decrease in vertigo-associated chronic dizziness. Studies have established that sleep (REM and slow-wave sleep) is essential to neuroplasticity processes, and this finding supports the premise of there being a correlation between the quality of sleep of patients following vestibular dysfunction and the effectiveness of vestibular compensation. An alteration in vestibular function can have repercussions on sleep quality, but the effect of such alteration on sleep remains unclarified. OSA, which induces sleep fragmentation, may lead to altered orexinergic activity. This may result in modulation of the vestibular nucleus activity, affecting postural instability and oculomotor control reported during the waking state [17].

In clinical practice, 4 hours of nightly CPAP use for 70% of nights is considered adequate compliance with the therapy. This translates into an average CPAP use of 2.8 hours every night. Reduced CPAP adherence and the predominantly untreated OSA during REM sleep may plausibly explain the negative effects of CPAP therapy on blood pressure control in randomized clinical trials. Critically, the use of CPAP for 3 or 4 hours from the time lights are turned off covers only 25% or 40% of REM sleep, respectively, and leaves most obstructive events during REM sleep untreated. Moreover, it is necessary to demonstrate that effective treatment of REM-related OSA, especially when associated with vertigo, leads to better patient outcomes. One study showed REM related OSA is the risk factor for dropout from CPAP therapy, (odds ratio, 41.984) [18].

Clinically, polysomnography and home sleep apnea testing can be performed for the diagnosis of OSA. Watch-PAT in one kind of home sleep apnea testing, which can detect REM sleep well as PSG. As for pediatric patients, Watch-PAT is also an effective device for diagnosing sleep disordered breathing [19].

A previous Japanese study demonstrated that female sex and age more than 50 years were key risk factors for REM-related OSA [20]. These results indicate that hormonal changes in women might play a major role in REM-related OSA and might reflect its unknown pathophysiological characteristics. In recent population-based case–control studies, women had a significantly higher risk for vertigo than men with sleep apnea did [5]. Another study showed that women had lower NREM AHI compared to men, but had similar REM AHI as men. Besides it also found that the occurrence of REM-related OSA in women was 62% and in men was 24% [21].

A national survey in Taiwan demonstrated that vertigo was a frequent complaint in the general adult population and tended to recur, particularly among older women [3]. A clinical population study revealed that up to 40% of women with an AHI of more than 15/h had 1 or more of the classic OSA symptoms of snoring, witnessed apneas, and daytime sleepiness [22]. These findings are also apparent in our study.

This study has several limitations, which should be considered in future works. Other comorbidities, such as hypertension, diabetes, and rhinitis, were not considered when comparing the outcomes of patients with REM-related and NREM–related OSA. Moreover, most patients in the vertigo group were older and thus reported less daytime sleepiness, which could have resulted in potential bias.

Conclusion

OSA patients with vertigo appear to have a higher rate of REM-related OSA, and the acceptance rate of CPAP treatment is low. Further research is needed to explore novel therapeutic approaches or the combination of currently available non-CPAP therapies, especially in patients with REM-related OSA. In addition, the odds ratio for REM-related OSA would be raised to 35(7.52–162.96) times, when OSA patients was a female, with vertigo symptom and less daytime sleepiness.

In the future, we plan to support these results and elucidate the vestibular–REM sleep interaction in a larger cohort, which could open avenues for further investigations.

Supporting information

S1 Dataset. The raw datasets and statistics for each analysis result graph and tables.

The raw data includes baseline characteristics of study participants and polysomnography results of participants.

(CSV)

Acknowledgments

Lin YC conceived the idea; all authors have contributed to the design of the study; Chen PY, Chen TY, Lin YC, Chao PZ, Liu WT, Bai CH, and Tsao ST, collected and managed the data, including quality control. Tsao ST and Bai CH provided statistical advice on study design and analyzed the data. Lin YC supervised the conduct of the study. Chen PY and Lin YC drafted the manuscript, and all authors contributed substantially to its revision. Lin YC takes responsibility for the paper as a whole.

Data Availability

All relevant data are within the manuscript and S1 Dataset.

Funding Statement

The authors received no specific funding for this work.

References

  • 1.Neuhauser HK. The epidemiology of dizziness and vertigo. Handb Clin Neurol. 2016;137:67–82. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-444-63437-5.00005-4 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Neuhauser HK, von Brevern M, Radtke A, Lezius F, Feldmann M, Ziese T, et al. Epidemiology of vestibular vertigo: a neurotologic survey of the general population. Neurology. 2005. Sep 27;65(6):898–904. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000175987.59991.3d Erratum in: Neurology. 2006 Oct 24;67(8):1528. . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Lai YT, Wang TC, Chuang LJ, Chen MH, Wang PC. Epidemiology of vertigo: a National Survey. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2011. Jul;145(1):110–6. doi: 10.1177/0194599811400007 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Lopez-Escamez JA, Gamiz MJ, Fernandez-Perez A, Gomez-Fiñana M, Sanchez-Canet I. Impact of treatment on health-related quality of life in patients with posterior canal benign paroxysmal positional vertigo. Otol Neurotol. 2003. Jul;24(4):637–41. doi: 10.1097/00129492-200307000-00018 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Tsai MS, Lee LA, Tsai YT, Yang YH, Liu CY, Lin MH, et al. Sleep apnea and risk of vertigo: A nationwide population-based cohort study. Laryngoscope. 2018. Mar;128(3):763–768. doi: 10.1002/lary.26789 Epub 2017 Aug 3. . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Nakayama M, Masuda A, Ando KB, Arima S, Kabaya K, Inagaki A, et al. A Pilot Study on the Efficacy of Continuous Positive Airway Pressure on the Manifestations of Ménière’s Disease in Patients with Concomitant Obstructive Sleep Apnea Syndrome. J Clin Sleep Med. 2015. Oct 15;11(10):1101–7. doi: 10.5664/jcsm.5080 ; PMCID: PMC4582051. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Iannella G, Maniaci A, Magliulo G, Cocuzza S, La Mantia I, et al. Current challenges in the diagnosis and treatment of obstructive sleep apnea syndrome in the elderly. Pol Arch Intern Med. 2020. Aug 27;130(7–8):649–654. doi: 10.20452/pamw.15283 Epub 2020 Apr 6. . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Goh DY, Galster P, Marcus CL. Sleep architecture and respiratory disturbances in children with obstructive sleep apnea. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2000. Aug;162(2 Pt 1):682–6. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm.162.2.9908058 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Karamessinis L, Galster P, Schultz B, Elliott J, Mason TA 2nd, Brooks LJ, et al. Relationship between REM density, duty cycle, and obstructive sleep apnea in children. Sleep. 2007. Jul;30(7):837–43. doi: 10.1093/sleep/30.7.837 ; PMCID: PMC1978365. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Al Oweidat K, AlRyalat SA, Al-Essa M, Obeidat N. Comparing REM- and NREM-Related Obstructive Sleep Apnea in Jordan: A Cross-Sectional Study. Can Respir J. 2018. Aug 12;2018:9270329. doi: 10.1155/2018/9270329 ; PMCID: PMC6109479. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Kapur VK, Auckley DH, Chowdhuri S, Kuhlmann DC, Mehra R, et al. Clinical Practice Guideline for Diagnostic Testing for Adult Obstructive Sleep Apnea: An American Academy of Sleep Medicine Clinical Practice Guideline. J Clin Sleep Med. 2017. Mar 15;13(3):479–504. doi: 10.5664/jcsm.6506 ; PMCID: PMC5337595. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Alzoubaidi M, Mokhlesi B. Obstructive sleep apnea during rapid eye movement sleep: clinical relevance and therapeutic implications. Curr Opin Pulm Med. 2016. Nov;22(6):545–54. doi: 10.1097/MCP.0000000000000319 ; PMCID: PMC5084837. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Punjabi NM, Bandeen-Roche K, Marx JJ, Neubauer DN, Smith PL, Schwartz AR. The association between daytime sleepiness and sleep-disordered breathing in NREM and REM sleep. Sleep. 2002. May 1;25(3):307–14. . [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Baldwin CM, Kapur VK, Holberg CJ, Rosen C, Nieto FJ; Sleep Heart Health Study Group. Associations between gender and measures of daytime somnolence in the Sleep Heart Health Study. Sleep. 2004. Mar 15;27(2):305–11. doi: 10.1093/sleep/27.2.305 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Varga AW, Mokhlesi B. REM obstructive sleep apnea: risk for adverse health outcomes and novel treatments. Sleep Breath. 2019. Jun;23(2):413–423. doi: 10.1007/s11325-018-1727-2 Epub 2018 Sep 19. ; PMCID: PMC6424642. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Nakayama M, Kabaya K. Obstructive sleep apnea syndrome as a novel cause for Ménière’s disease. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2013. Oct;21(5):503–8. doi: 10.1097/MOO.0b013e32836463bc . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Besnard S, Tighilet B, Chabbert C, Hitier M, Toulouse J, et al. The balance of sleep: Role of the vestibular sensory system. Sleep Med Rev. 2018. Dec;42:220–228. doi: 10.1016/j.smrv.2018.09.001 Epub 2018 Sep 8. . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Hoshino T, Sasanabe R, Tanigawa T, Murotani K, Arimoto M, Ueda H, et al. Effect of rapid eye movement-related obstructive sleep apnea on adherence to continuous positive airway pressure. J Int Med Res. 2018. Jun;46(6):2238–2248. doi: 10.1177/0300060518758583 Epub 2018 Apr 3. ; PMCID: PMC6023053. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Serra A, Cocuzza S, Maiolino L, Abramo A, Spinato G, et al. The watch-pat in pediatrics sleep disordered breathing: Pilot study on children with negative nocturnal pulse oximetry. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2017. Jun;97:245–250. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2017.04.021 Epub 2017 Apr 17. . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Mano M, Hoshino T, Sasanabe R, Murotani K, Nomura A, et al. Impact of Gender and Age on Rapid Eye Movement-Related Obstructive Sleep Apnea: A Clinical Study of 3234 Japanese OSA Patients. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019. Mar 25;16(6):1068. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16061068 ; PMCID: PMC6466410. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.O’Connor C, Thornley KS, Hanly PJ. Gender differences in the polysomnographic features of obstructive sleep apnea. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2000. May;161(5):1465–72. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm.161.5.9904121 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Valipour A, Lothaller H, Rauscher H, Zwick H, Burghuber OC, Lavie P. Gender-related differences in symptoms of patients with suspected breathing disorders in sleep: a clinical population study using the sleep disorders questionnaire. Sleep. 2007. Mar;30(3):312–9. doi: 10.1093/sleep/30.3.312 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Decision Letter 0

Giannicola Iannella

11 Mar 2021

PONE-D-21-02581

Patients with Vertigo Have a Higher Risk of REM-Related Obstructive Sleep Apnea

PLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Lin,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

Please submit your revised manuscript by Apr 12 2021 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Giannicola Iannella, M.D

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Journal Requirements:

When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements.

1. Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf

2. Thank you for stating the following financial disclosure:

 "No"

At this time, please address the following queries:

  1. Please clarify the sources of funding (financial or material support) for your study. List the grants or organizations that supported your study, including funding received from your institution.

  2. State what role the funders took in the study. If the funders had no role in your study, please state: “The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.”

  3. If any authors received a salary from any of your funders, please state which authors and which funders.

  4. If you did not receive any funding for this study, please state: “The authors received no specific funding for this work.”

Please include your amended statements within your cover letter; we will change the online submission form on your behalf.

3.We note that you have indicated that data from this study are available upon request. PLOS only allows data to be available upon request if there are legal or ethical restrictions on sharing data publicly. For information on unacceptable data access restrictions, please see http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/data-availability#loc-unacceptable-data-access-restrictions.

In your revised cover letter, please address the following prompts:

a) If there are ethical or legal restrictions on sharing a de-identified data set, please explain them in detail (e.g., data contain potentially identifying or sensitive patient information) and who has imposed them (e.g., an ethics committee). Please also provide contact information for a data access committee, ethics committee, or other institutional body to which data requests may be sent.

b) If there are no restrictions, please upload the minimal anonymized data set necessary to replicate your study findings as either Supporting Information files or to a stable, public repository and provide us with the relevant URLs, DOIs, or accession numbers. Please see http://www.bmj.com/content/340/bmj.c181.long for guidelines on how to de-identify and prepare clinical data for publication. For a list of acceptable repositories, please see http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/data-availability#loc-recommended-repositories.

We will update your Data Availability statement on your behalf to reflect the information you provide.

4. Please amend your manuscript to include your abstract after the title page.

5.Thank you for submitting the above manuscript to PLOS ONE. During our internal evaluation of the manuscript, we found significant text overlap between your submission and the following previously published works:

https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11325-018-1727-2?code=70a2e2ef-1617-4025-b1fc-e050d7cbf1c1&error=cookies_not_supported

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1087079218300868?via%3Dihub

https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0012369217309303

https://www.hindawi.com/journals/crj/2018/9270329/

http://www.congre.co.jp/15jtcohns/program/abstract.pdf

We would like to make you aware that copying extracts from previous publications, especially outside the methods section, word-for-word is unacceptable. In addition, the reproduction of text from published reports has implications for the copyright that may apply to the publications.

Please revise the manuscript to rephrase the duplicated text, cite your sources, and provide details as to how the current manuscript advances on previous work. Please note that further consideration is dependent on the submission of a manuscript that addresses these concerns about the overlap in text with published work.

We will carefully review your manuscript upon resubmission, so please ensure that your revision is thorough.

Additional Editor Comments:

Reviewers suggest revisions to your manuscript.

Best regards

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: No

**********

2. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

3. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

4. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

5. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: Maybe more fascinating title would be: REM-Related Obstructive Sleep Apnea and Vertigo: a Retrospective case-control study.

Introduction

- Add reference line 1 of vertigo prevalence.

- ‘’A national Taiwan study’’ insert p value data.

- ‘’ In recent population-based case–control studies’’Describe data of the population analyzed in the study to highilight the connection and add this reference: doi: 10.5664/jcsm.5080.

- ‘’ OSA is a frequent disorder characterized by’’ also cite other classical sleep stage in children and elderly patients using these references: doi:10.1164/ajrccm.162.2.9908058; DOI: 10.20452/pamw.15283 ; DOI: 10.1093/sleep/30.7.837

Study design

- Cite AASM guidelines for PSG describing better the procedures

Ethical approval is written in red: modify

Tables describe in wich group was performed the analysis: total vs control, total vs vertigo or what?

In the captations specify: Abbreviations: st90, sleep time…

Discussion PSG index is not anymore considered the only effective tool to evaluate sleep breathing disorder especially in children. Describe a different procedure and the data reported in this study doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2017.04.021.

Minor corrections:

Introduction

- correct ‘’were experiencing’’;

- modify center in centre;

- correct tumor in tumour;

- who were blindend in who was blinded;

- t test in t-test;

- or exinergic activity in orexinergic activity;

Discussion

- correct ‘’tends’’ in tended

Reviewer #2: The paper claims an innovative topic about sleep apnea. However, I have some doubts in relation to your evidences.

Introduction:

You cited your unpublished article without a sufficient definition of the parameters used to perform it.

Methods:

You said that 171 patients were enrolled with a diagnosis of OSA, but you did not classify the grade of vertigo disease of 58 patients and how it was diagnosed. Moreover, there were not given any information about the type of dizziness, the other symptomatology referred, and the previous eventual ear diseases.

Discussion

You asserted that “In our study, REM-related OSA had a CPAP acceptance rate of only 3.4%.”, but not described how you collected these data (duration of disease, duration of CPAP treatment etc…).

Could you clarify these topics?

**********

6. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: No

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

Attachment

Submitted filename: Revisor response.docx

PLoS One. 2021 Jun 11;16(6):e0252844. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0252844.r002

Author response to Decision Letter 0


12 May 2021

We thank the reviewers for their constructive comments. We have revised the manuscript to address all the questions and comments raised by the three reviewers. We highlight changes made to the original version by setting the text colour to red. Our specific responses to each comment are as follows:

Responses to reviewers #1:

Maybe more fascinating title would be: REM-Related Obstructive Sleep Apnea and Vertigo: a Retrospective case-control study.

� We are grateful for all of your constructive comments, and we revised our title

Introduction

� Add reference line 1 of vertigo prevalence.

- Thank you for the comment. We add the reference in the article.

- [Please see line 65, introduction section; line 299, reference section]

� ‘’A national Taiwan study’’ insert p value data.

- Thank you for the comment. We add p value in the article.

- [Please see line 70, introduction section]

� ‘’ In recent population-based case–control studies’’Describe data of the population analyzed in the study to highilight the connection and add this reference: doi: 10.5664/jcsm.5080.

- Thank you for the comment. We highlight the connection and add the reference in the article.

- [Please see line 72-76, introduction section; line 319-324, reference section]

- A recent population-based case–control study, 5,025 newly diagnosed with sleep apnea patients from the National Health Insurance Research Database of Taiwan, has been demonstrated sleep apnea is significantly associated with a higher incidence (hazard ratio, 1.71) of vertigo [5]. Vertigo symptoms of Ménière's disease patients with OSAS can be improved by CPAP therapy [6].

� ‘’ OSA is a frequent disorder characterized by’’ also cite other classical sleep stage in children and elderly patients using these references:

DOI: 10.20452/pamw.15283 ;

- Thank you for the comment. We add the reference in the article.

[Please see line 79-81, introduction section; line 325-328, reference section]

- OSA should be always suspected in elderly patients who show typical nighttime or daytime symptoms of sleep apnea. PSG is a necessary examination for the diagnosis of OSA in elderly patients [7].

� DOI: 10.1093/sleep/30.7.837 and doi:10.1164/ajrccm.162.2.9908058;

- Thank you for the comment. We add the reference in the article.

[Please see line 84-87, introduction section; line 329-336, reference section]

- OSA may be predominantly a REM phenomenon in children and increasing in apnea severity may be secondary to changes in upper airway neuromotor control, changes in REM density [8], or upper airway muscle fatigue due to change in respiratory duty cycle [9].

Study design

� Cite AASM guidelines for PSG describing better the procedures

- Thank you for the comment. We add the reference in the article.

[Please see line 106-113,methods section; line 341-345, reference section]

- According to the third edition of the International Classification of Sleep Disorders (ICSD-3), OSA defined as PSG-determined obstructive respiratory disturbance index (RDI) ≥ 5 events/h associated with the typical symptoms of OSA (e.g., unrefreshing sleep, daytime sleepiness, fatigue or insomnia, awakening with a gasping or choking sensation, loud snoring, or witnessed apneas), or an obstructive RDI ≥ 15 events/h (even in the absence of symptoms). In addition to apneas and hypopneas index, the RDI includes respiratory effort-related arousals (RERAs) [11].

� Ethical approval is written in red:

- Thank you for the comment. We revised the color.

[Please see line 141-145,methods section]

� Tables describe in wich group was performed the analysis: total vs control, total vs vertigo or what?

- Thank you for the comment. We add the description below the tables

[Please see line 153-154,result section; line 160-161, result section; table 1 and 2]

- *Comparison of the control group and the vertigo group was performed the t-test to evaluate the difference; except the gender were performed the chi square test.

� In the captations specify: Abbreviations: st90, sleep time…

- Thank you for the comment. We add the description below the tables

[Please see line 156-159, result section; table 2]

- *RDI, Respiratory disturbance index; ODI, oxygen desaturation index; ST90, sleep time with SpO2< 90%; CT90, cumulative time percentage with SpO2 < 90%. LSAT, lowest oxygen saturation; mean SAT, mean oxygen saturation; PLMI, periodic leg movement index.

Discussion

� PSG index is not anymore considered the only effective tool to evaluate sleep breathing disorder especially in children. Describe a different procedure and the data reported in this study

doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2017.04.021.

- Thank you for the comment. We add the reference in the article.

[Please see line 239-242, discussion section; line 374-377, reference section ]

- Clinically, polysomnography and home sleep apnea testing can be performed for the diagnosis of OSA. Watch-PAT in one kind of home sleep apnea testing, which can detect REM sleep well as PSG. As for pediatric patients, Watch-PAT is also an effective device for diagnosing sleep disordered breathing [19].

Minor corrections:

Introduction

- correct ‘’were experiencing’’; � we delete this paragraph.

- modify center in centre; � we delete this paragraph.

- correct tumor in tumour; � [Please see line 48, abstract section; line 114, methods section]

- who were blindend in who was blinded; � [Please see line 131, methods section]

- t test in t-test; � [Please see line 135, methods section; line 153, results section]

- or exinergic activity in orexinergic activity; � [Please see line 224, discussion section]

Discussion

- correct ‘’tends’’ in tended� [Please see line 252, discussion section]

Responses to reviewers #2:

Introduction:

You cited your unpublished article without a sufficient definition of the parameters used to perform it.

- Thank you for the comment. We delete this paragraph.

- [Please see line 91-95, introduction section]

Methods:

You said that 171 patients were enrolled with a diagnosis of OSA, but you did not classify the grade of vertigo disease of 58 patients and how it was diagnosed. Moreover, there were not given any information about the type of dizziness, the other symptomatology referred, and the previous eventual ear diseases.

- Thank you for the comment. We revised this paragraph.

- [Please see line 114-121, methods section]

- We define vertigo group as patients who had two or more clinical visits due to vertigo within two years before the diagnosis of OSA. Besides, patients who experienced at least three months between two vertigo episodes. Fifty-eight patients were allocated to the vertigo group, and 113 patients who had no complaints of dizziness or vertigo within two years before the diagnosis of OSA were allocated to the control group.

Discussion

You asserted that “In our study, REM-related OSA had a CPAP acceptance rate of only 3.4%.”, but not described how you collected these data (duration of disease, duration of CPAP treatment etc…).

Could you clarify these topics?

- Thank you for the comment. We revised this paragraph. We delete “In our study, REM-related OSA had a CPAP acceptance rate of only 3.4%.” and change to “One study showed REM related OSA is the risk factor for dropout from CPAP therapy, (odds ratio, 41.984) [Hoshino T et al., 2018].”

[Please see line 235-237, discussion section]

- Hoshino T, Sasanabe R, Tanigawa T, Murotani K, Arimoto M, Ueda H, Shiomi T. Effect of rapid eye movement-related obstructive sleep apnea on adherence to continuous positive airway pressure. J Int Med Res. 2018 Jun;46(6):2238-2248. doi: 10.1177/0300060518758583. Epub 2018 Apr 3. PMID: 29614906; PMCID: PMC6023053.

Attachment

Submitted filename: Response-to-Reviewers REMOSA PLOSONE 20210428 version 3.00.docx

Decision Letter 1

Giannicola Iannella

24 May 2021

REM-Related Obstructive Sleep Apnea and Vertigo: a Retrospective case-control study.

PONE-D-21-02581R1

Dear Dr. Lin,

We’re pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been judged scientifically suitable for publication and will be formally accepted for publication once it meets all outstanding technical requirements.

Within one week, you’ll receive an e-mail detailing the required amendments. When these have been addressed, you’ll receive a formal acceptance letter and your manuscript will be scheduled for publication.

An invoice for payment will follow shortly after the formal acceptance. To ensure an efficient process, please log into Editorial Manager at http://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/, click the 'Update My Information' link at the top of the page, and double check that your user information is up-to-date. If you have any billing related questions, please contact our Author Billing department directly at authorbilling@plos.org.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper to help maximize its impact. If they’ll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team as soon as possible -- no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

Kind regards,

Giannicola Iannella, M.D

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Additional Editor Comments (optional):

The authors clarified many aspects suggested by the reviewers and improved the manuscript.

In my opinion it deserved the publication on PLOS-ONE

Reviewers' comments:

-

Acceptance letter

Giannicola Iannella

3 Jun 2021

PONE-D-21-02581R1

REM-Related Obstructive Sleep Apnea and Vertigo: a Retrospective case-control study.

Dear Dr. Lin:

I'm pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been deemed suitable for publication in PLOS ONE. Congratulations! Your manuscript is now with our production department.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please let them know about your upcoming paper now to help maximize its impact. If they'll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team within the next 48 hours. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information please contact onepress@plos.org.

If we can help with anything else, please email us at plosone@plos.org.

Thank you for submitting your work to PLOS ONE and supporting open access.

Kind regards,

PLOS ONE Editorial Office Staff

on behalf of

Dr. Giannicola Iannella

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    S1 Dataset. The raw datasets and statistics for each analysis result graph and tables.

    The raw data includes baseline characteristics of study participants and polysomnography results of participants.

    (CSV)

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Revisor response.docx

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Response-to-Reviewers REMOSA PLOSONE 20210428 version 3.00.docx

    Data Availability Statement

    All relevant data are within the manuscript and S1 Dataset.


    Articles from PLoS ONE are provided here courtesy of PLOS

    RESOURCES