Skip to main content
Molecules logoLink to Molecules
. 2021 May 21;26(11):3084. doi: 10.3390/molecules26113084

Elucidation of Gram-Positive Bacterial Iron(III) Reduction for Kaolinite Clay Refinement

Hao Jing 1, Zhao Liu 1, Seng How Kuan 2, Sylvia Chieng 3, Chun Loong Ho 1,*
Editor: Antonio Randazzo
PMCID: PMC8196777  PMID: 34064160

Abstract

Recently, microbial-based iron reduction has been considered as a viable alternative to typical chemical-based treatments. The iron reduction is an important process in kaolin refining, where iron-bearing impurities in kaolin clay affects the whiteness, refractory properties, and its commercial value. In recent years, Gram-negative bacteria has been in the center stage of iron reduction research, whereas little is known about the potential use of Gram-positive bacteria to refine kaolin clay. In this study, we investigated the ferric reducing capabilities of five microbes by manipulating the microbial growth conditions. Out of the five, we discovered that Bacillus cereus and Staphylococcus aureus outperformed the other microbes under nitrogen-rich media. Through the biochemical changes and the microbial behavior, we mapped the hypothetical pathway leading to the iron reduction cellular properties, and found that the iron reduction properties of these Gram-positive bacteria rely heavily on the media composition. The media composition results in increased basification of the media that is a prerequisite for the cellular reduction of ferric ions. Further, these changes impact the formation of biofilm, suggesting that the cellular interaction for the iron(III)oxide reduction is not solely reliant on the formation of biofilms. This article reveals the potential development of Gram-positive microbes in facilitating the microbial-based removal of metal contaminants from clays or ores. Further studies to elucidate the corresponding pathways would be crucial for the further development of the field.

Keywords: kaolin, iron(III)oxide, reduction, medium, secondary metabolites

1. Introduction

Kaolin is a clay mineral with stable chemical properties and good fire resistance, widely used in manufacturing paper, enamel, rubber, plastic, ceramics, coatings, cement, petrochemical, textile, and glass fiber [1,2]. However, kaolin often contains iron and aluminate contaminants, affecting its commercial value and product stability [2,3].

The conventional kaolin refining technology can be divided into three approaches: physical (Figure 1a), chemical (Figure 1b), and microbial methods; but each approach presents many limitations. The physical process is ineffective in purifying heavily contaminated kaolin clay, relying on heavy equipment, trained personnel, and expansive energy consumption [3,4,5,6]. The more effective chemical method removes iron contaminants but employs various chemical reagents to facilitate the iron reduction process. This process is found to be hazardous to both personnel and the environment [7,8]. Lately, microbial-based treatment has become an emerging technology used for removing iron contaminants. This approach does not affect kaolin’s physical and chemical properties, and requiring low energy consumption with minimal impact on the environment. However, the processing time and the cultivation conditions (temperature, pH, medium conditions, and so forth) prevent the technology from moving forward.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

The traditional refining technology of kaolin. (a) Physical and (b) chemical methods used in isolating pure kaolin from iron contaminants.

Iron contaminants in kaolin exist mainly in the form of ferric(III)oxide, where an acid (<pH 3) is typically used in reducing ferric(III)oxide during kaolin purification. Ferrous ion, the reduced state of ferric ions, is soluble at a wide range of pH and remains stable at neutral or alkaline. In the presence of oxygen, ferrous ions rapidly oxidize to ferric ion, forming dense ferric(III)oxide solids. Many studies suggest that a microorganism with iron-reducing ability is attributed to its production of organic acids that dissolve ferric(III)oxide in the kaolin (reaction Equations (1) and (2)). For instance, co-culturing kaolin with Aspergillus niger for 40 h increased kaolin whiteness by over 50% [9]. However, this approach requires sustained acidification of the culture medium to pH 3. Iron-respiring bacteria (IRB) reduces ferric(III)oxide by electron transfer, where the resulting ferrous ions are used in microbial metabolism [10,11]. Shewanella is an example of microbial reduction of oxidized metals such as manganese and iron for microbial growth [12,13]. A variety of IRB have been isolated from sedimentary kaolin strata, providing a collection of potential microorganisms for the use of removing kaolin impurities, offering new and exciting avenues of microbial-based processes.

Fe2O3 + 6H+ → 2Fe3+ + 3H2O (1)
Fe3+ + e → Fe2+ (2)

This study investigates the ferric reduction properties of several Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria, aiming to understand the microbial bioleaching mechanism and the elicited changes in the surrounding microenvironment. Based on the biochemical analysis, we found two Gram-positive bacteria that showed promising iron reduction activity.

2. Results

We selected five bacteria to investigate the ferric(III)oxide reducing properties, comprising of two Gram-positive bacteria and three Gram-negative bacteria. Among them, Bacillus cereus UKMTAR-4 (B. cereus) and Staphylococcus aureus NCTC 6571 (S. aureus) are Gram-positive bacteria; whereas Burkholderia thailandeensis MSMB43 (B. thailandeensis), Escherichia coli K-12 (E. coli), and Pseudomonas aeruginosa DWW3 (P. aeruginosa) are Gram-negative. Ferric(III)oxide reducing properties of each microbe was observed throughout 14 days using both ferric(III)oxide and raw iron-contaminated kaolin clay from Jiangxi Province, China.

2.1. Microbial-Based Ferric(III)oxide-Reduction

The five microbes cultured in ferric(III)oxide-lysogeny broth (LB) were monitored daily for their ferrous ion concentration, pH changes, and bacterial growth rate. Under a nitrogen-rich medium such as LB, most microbes raised the pH in the media by producing ammonia as a byproduct of nutrient utilization for growth and metabolism [14,15,16]. We discovered that B. cereus (Figure 2a), B. thailandeensis (Figure 2c), and E. coli (Figure 2d) showed elevated levels of ferrous ions on the sixth to eighth day before returning to basal levels. Correspondingly, the cultured medium’s pH values of these microbes exceeded pH 8.5 on day 6. Additionally, B. cereus and B. thailandeensis showed an observable lag phase and slower exponential growth during the first to sixth day. We similarly observed that the microbial cultures without ferric(III)oxide to a lesser extent also basified the media, below pH 8.5 (Figure S1). Additionally, there were no significant changes to the growth rate comparing the cultures of the microbes with and without ferric(III)oxide, indicating that there was no cellular toxicity caused by the ferric or ferrous ions produced (Figure S1). The iron reduction process successfully reduced 40.3%, 32.3%, and 33.3% of the total weight of ferric(III)oxide using B. cereus, B. thailandeensis, and E. coli, respectively. The loss of net ferric(III)oxide that is not reflected in the extracellular matrix suggests that the reduced ferrous ions were internalized for cellular metabolism.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Microbial-mediated ferric(III)oxide reduction cultured in nitrogen-rich media. (a) B. cereus. (b) S. aureus. (c) B. thailandeensis. (d) E. coli. (e) P. aeruginosa. (f) Negative control (LB with ferric(III)oxide). (Inline graphic): ferrous ion concentration; (Inline graphic): pH value, and bar chart: log10 colony forming unit (CFU)·mL−1; LB: lysogeny broth.

S. aureus (Figure 2b) and P. aeruginosa (Figure 2e) showed no changes in the ferrous ion concentration, exhibiting unhampered growth. Interestingly, S. aureus cultures showed changes in pH where the cultures basified to approximately 8.5 before remaining stationary in that pH range.

2.2. Microbial-Based Reduction of Ferric(III)oxide Contaminants in Kaolin Clay

The ferric reduction properties of the five microbes cultured in kaolin clay-LB showed that B. cereus (Figure 3a) and S. aureus (Figure 3b) facilitated ferric(III)oxide reduction in kaolin clay on the 10th to 13th day of incubation. The surrounding medium’s pH increased to above pH 8.5 after day 6 and day 9, respectively. Cultures using B. cereus also showed a prominent lag phase until day 7 prior to seeing an increase of growth. Interestingly, cultures using B. thailandeensis (Figure 3c) showed similar pH and growth trends compared to the incubation with ferric(III)oxide. However, there was no noticeable increase in ferrous ions resulting in the B. thailandeensis cultures. The untreated kaolin clay was found to have 1.36% ferric(III)oxide contaminants. We found that using S. aureus removed 76.2% of the total ferric(III)oxide contaminants (Figure 3j). B. cereus and B. thailandeensis removed a total of 38.7% (Figure 3i) and 31.4% (Figure 3h) of ferric(III)oxide contaminants, respectively. The iron reducing process was visually observable from the kaolin clay retrieved from the treatment, showing improved whiteness from samples being treated with the three microbes when compared to the untreated kaolin clay (Figure 3g–i).

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Microbial-mediated ferric(III)oxide reduction in kaolin clay cultured in nitrogen-rich media. (a) B. cereus. (b) S. aureus. (c) B. thailandeensis. (d) E. coli. (e) P. aeruginosa. (f) Negative control (LB with ferric(III)oxide). The retrieved kaolin clay after incubation including the (g) untreated, (h) B. thailandeensis, (i) B. cereus, and (j) S. aureus (Bar: 1 cm). (Inline graphic): ferrous ion concentration; (Inline graphic): pH value, and bar chart: log10 CFU·mL−1; LB: lysogeny broth.

There were no observable changes in the ferrous levels from cultures using E. coli (Figure 3d) or P. aeruginosa (Figure 3e). Similarly, there were no significant changes in both these cultures’ pH values while exhibiting unhampered growth.

Based on the similarity, we are confident that the changes in the microbes’ pH conditions influence the response of the microbial bioleaching and impact the growth of the microbial cells. In both studies, B. cereus was a potential candidate to reduce ferric(III)oxide in kaolin clay, followed by S. aureus. Thus, to further understand the mechanism behind the bioleaching process, we conducted a closer inspection of B. cereus and S. aureus bioleaching properties under differing culturing conditions. We hypothesized that the different medium condition influences the microbial ability to leach these metal contaminants.

2.3. Reduction Effect of B. cereus in Different Medium

Among the five microbes tested, B. cereus was the most efficient in reducing ferric(III)oxide. Thus, we investigated the corresponding pathways leading to the ferric(III)oxide reduction using different medium compositions.

In order to achieve this objective, we cultured B. cereus in 1× LB (Figure 4a,b), 10-fold diluted LB (0.1 LB) (Figure 4c,d), and glucose medium (1.5% w/v). We found that B. cereus cultured with either LB or 0.1 LB showed increased basification of the medium, but lag phase disappeared in 0.1 LB (Figure 4, Figures S1 and S2). We further found that the use of 0.1 LB resulted in the best reduction of ferric(III)oxide salt, showing a total amassed value of 3.0 mg/L of ferrous ion in the medium. However, this particular trend was not observed in the kaolin introduced samples. We further found that B. cereus cultured in either ferric(III)oxide-0.1 LB or kaolin-0.1 LB was found to inhibit the microbial biofilm formation (Figure 4g,h) when compared to B. cereus biofilms formed on glass surfaces when grown in plain media (Figure S3). We noticed that in nitrogen-rich media, B. cereus readily interacted with the ferric(III)oxide and kaolin clay, where the cultures remained in suspension after remaining stationary for 10 min (Figure S4a).

Figure 4.

Figure 4

B. cereus ferric(III)oxide reduction and biofilm formation in different medium. Reduced ferrous, pH values, and growth rate of B. cereus cultured in (a) ferric(III)oxide-LB, (b) kaolin-LB, (c) ferric(III)oxide-0.1 LB, (d) kaolin-0.1 LB, (e) ferric(III)oxide-glucose, and (f) kaolin-glucose. The biofilm mass of B. cereus on (g) ferric(III)oxide and (h) kaolin clay. (Inline graphic): ferrous ion concentration; (Inline graphic): pH value, and bar chart: log10 CFU·mL−1; LB: lysogeny broth.

In contrast to the use of LB, glucose medium was found to acidify the medium, impacting the growth of B. cereus (Figure 4e,f). We found that the glucose rapidly decreased the pH to approximately pH 4 upon 24 h of culturing, resulting in poor microbial viability. Furthermore, ferric(III)oxide was found to negate the acidity’s effects on B. cereus, resulting in sustained growth, albeit lower than those cultured in LB, but did not restore the microbial cells’ ability to reduce the oxidize irons.

2.4. Reduction Effect of S. aureus in Different Medium

We also investigated the S. aureus behavior by regulating the different medium compositions. We found reduced ferrous was only present in kaolin samples cultured in LB medium (Figure 5a,b), indicating that the microbes could only reduce oxidized irons from these samples. Similar to the observation in B. cereus, the use of nitrogen-rich medium LB facilitated the medium’s basification. However, the 0.1 LB limited the growth of the microbial cells and, in doing so, reduced the rate of medium basification (Figure 5c,d). Similarly, the use of 0.1 LB inhibited cellular growth in S. aureus, showing lesser basification of the media (Figures S1 and S2). We similarly observed that the use of 0.1 LB also inhibited biofilm formation on the ferric(III)oxide and kaolin clay surfaces (Figure 5g,h), compared to the cultures on the glass surfaces (Figure S3). We also observed that in nitrogen-rich media, S. aureus also readily interacted with the ferric(III)oxide and kaolin clay, where the cultures remained in suspension after remaining stationary for 10 min (Figure S4b).

Figure 5.

Figure 5

S. aureus ferric(III)oxide reduction and biofilm formation in different medium. Reduced ferrous, pH values, and growth rate of S. aureus cultured in (a) ferric(III)oxide-LB, (b) kaolin-LB, (c) ferric(III)oxide-0.1 LB, (d) kaolin-0.1 LB, (e) ferric(III)oxide-glucose, and (f) kaolin-glucose. The biofilm mass of S. aureus on (g) ferric(III)oxide and (h) kaolin clay. (Inline graphic): ferrous ion concentration; (Inline graphic): pH value, and bar chart: log10 CFU·mL−1; LB: lysogeny broth.

Similar to B. cereus, the use of the carbon-rich medium, 1.5% glucose (Figure 5e,f), resulted in the medium’s rapid acidification to approximately pH 4. The acidic environment hampered the growth of the microbes resulting in cellular death of S. aureus. Similarly, under such conditions, it was noticed that there was no significant reduction of ferric(III)oxide to ferrous ions.

3. Discussion

We demonstrated that B. cereus is the most efficient in reducing iron contaminants in kaolin and ferric(III)oxide, followed by S. aureus which only strips iron contaminants from kaolin. In kaolin clay, crystalline ferric(III)oxide is found as small particles, while the amorphous ferric(III)oxide is presented on the surface of kaolin particles [17]. The ferric(III)oxide salt, on the other hand, exists in the α-ferric(III)oxide crystalline form. We are led to believe that S. aureus can only reduce amorphous ferric(III)oxide, whereas B. cereus can reduce crystalline and amorphous ferric(III)oxide. This selectiveness is due to the amorphous ferric(III)oxide’s hydrophilic nature, facilitating more straightforward iron reduction [18].

Our findings on B. cereus-mediated ferric(III)oxide reduction in differing mediums reveal that a nitrogen-rich medium increases the iron reduction in both the ferric(III)oxide salt and kaolin. It is fascinating that the 0.1 LB showed an improved accumulation of ferrous ions in the medium. In the presence of ferric(III)oxide salt or kaolin clay, B. cereus triggers further basification of the media, causing the microbes to readily adhere to the crystalline ferric(III)oxide surface [19] (Figure 6a). In response, yxeB(an iron(II+) hydroxamate-binding protein) shuttles the ferric oxide into the microbial cytoplasm through the means of siderophores ferrioxamine B/desferrioxamine B [20]. Additionally, B. cereus regulates iron metabolism using the asb gene cluster producing the siderophore petrobactin used in combating oxidative stress, iron acquisition, and virulence [21,22,23]. The internalized ferric ions are then hypothesized to be reduced to the ferrous state through reduction caused by pH changes and superoxide dismutase. The medium’s basification results in the upregulation of stress response factor, sigB and Na+/H+ antiporter napA [24]. These two genes are involved in ablating the increased alkaline environment around the B. cereus involved in pH homeostasis in the alkaline pH range [25]. To facilitate this process, iron(III)oxide is reduced to the ferrous ion state, contributing protons for neutralizing the alkaline environment. Additionally, the reduction of ferric to ferrous ions via superoxide dismutase A facilitates iron uptake crucial to the growth and sporulation of B. cereus spores. Our observation on the B. cereus growth indicates that the reduced ferrous ions are depleted rapidly during microbial expansion, where the microbe’s upper growth limit inhibits further reduction and uptake of iron ions. Similarly, the use of 0.1 LB restricts the rapid expansion of microbial growth, resulting in the observed increased extracellular build-up of ferrous in the medium. Further contributed by the medium’s alkaline state, the ferrous ions remain in their reduced state in the extracellular matrix.

Figure 6.

Figure 6

Hypothesized pathway involved in bacterial reduction of ferric ions. (a) B. cereus. (b) S. aureus.

S. aureus-mediated ferric(III)oxide reduction is only observed in a nitrogen-rich medium. However, in the study, culturing S. aureus in 0.1 LB resulted in a cellular deficit. This phenomenon can be attributed to shifting the microbial lifestyle to form biofilms due to the limiting nutrient. S. aureus employs a similar approach in iron(III)oxide metabolism (Figure 6b). Previous studies found that S. aureus readily adheres to amorphous ferric ions such as haem, hemoglobin, and lactoferrin [26], triggering the upregulation of iron-regulated surface determinant (Isd) proteins via the Fur repressor inactivation [27]. The Isd system binds ferric ions through surface receptor interactions and internalizes using lipoproteins and membrane permease. The Isd-internalized ferric ions are bound to staphyloferrin, a siderophore produced by the sbn gene cluster. SbnI is a DNA-binding regulatory protein that senses iron to regulate the synthesis of staphyloferrin [28,29]. The ferric-bound stapyloferrin is reduced to ferrous through interactions with iron uptake oxidoreductase (IruO), a nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate (NADPH)-dependent reductase. IruO functions as an electron donor to degrading enzymes IsdG or IsdI, releasing ferric ions and reducing them to ferrous ions [30]. Additionally, the surrounding medium’s basification triggers the upregulation of sigB and DacA, a deadenylate cyclase enzyme used in regulating nitrogen metabolism and promoting ammonium and glutamine uptake [31,32,33]. The increased cellular base then reduces ferric ions to ferrous to balance the internal cellular pH [34]. The resulting ferrous ions used in the S. aureus cellular metabolism result in the loss of detectable ferrous ions in the extracellular matrix.

The study of these Gram-positive microbes revealed that the iron-reducing mechanism differs from other previously reported Gram-negative microbes. Previous studies on Gram-negative bacteria such as Pseudomonas and Shewanella oneidensis showed that the reduction of iron metals relies on producing organic acids, resulting in the acidification of the surrounding medium. These studies often use sugar (e.g., glucose, lactose, maltose, starch, sucrose, or molasses) as an energy source, increasing acidification.

Based on these findings, we believe that the Gram-positive microbes facilitate the initial binding of microbes on the clay by altering the metal clays’ surface charges through the medium’s basification. Particularly in reducing crystalline ferric(III)oxide, the basification process’s role increases the salt’s surface charges to facilitate microbial colonization on the surface of the metal ores needed for electron transfer. Although both microbes are Gram-positive, the oxide iron reduction method differs slightly between the two microbes, evidenced by the two microbes’ differing preferences to strip crystalline and amorphous ferric(III)oxide.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Materials and Strains

All culturing media ingredients were purchased from Oxoid (Basingstoke, Hampshire, United Kingdom), Macklin (Shanghai, China) and Aladdin (Shanghai, China). Biochemical assay solutions were purchased from Aladdin (Shanghai, China), Dieckmann (Shenzhen, Guangdong, China) and Shanghai lingfeng chemical reagent Co., LTD (Shanghai, China). Raw kaolin was acquired from the local Chinese mines in Jiangxi Province, China.

Microbial strains Pseudomonas aeruginosa DWW 3 and Escherichia coli K-12 were acquired as a gift from Yang Liang, SUSTech; Burkholderia thailandeensis MSMB43 and Staphylococcus aureus NCTC 6571(from ATCC 9144) were acquired from the in-house microbial bank; while Bacillus cereus UKMTAR-4 was acquired as a gift from Sylvia Chieng, Universiti Kebangsaan, Malaysia.

The prepared medium included lysogeny broth, LB (10 g tryptone, 5 g yeast extract, and 10 g sodium chloride per liter); 10× diluted lysogeny broth, 0.1 LB (1 g tryptone, 0.5 g yeast extract, and 1 g sodium chloride per liter); and glucose medium (1.5% glucose w/v). Cultures were prepared using double distilled water and sterilized at 121 °C, 20 min prior to use. All microbial seed cultures were prepared in LB medium, incubated at 37 °C overnight.

4.2. Equipments

Qianyan shaker (Changsha, Hunan, China), Yiheng constant temperature incubator (Shanghai, China), Yuanxi ultraviolet spectrophotometer (Shanghai, China), Eppendorf centrifuge (Hamburg, Germany), Tecan microplate reader (Männedorf, Canton of Zurich, Switzerland), Mettler pH meter (Zurich, Canton of Zurich, Switzerland).

4.3. Microbial Culturing Conditions

Microbes were cultured in lysogeny broth, LB, 0.1 LB medium, and glucose medium against ferric(III)oxide or kaolin ore. Briefly, 50 mL of culture medium was added with 0.3 g of ferric(III)oxide or 1g of kaolin powder and inoculated with the respective microbes to a final optical density of 0.02 (λ = 600 nm). Triplicates of each cultures were incubated under continuous shaking at room temperature and 160 rpm. Time-course sampling was conducted throughout the 14 days of incubation at 24 h intervals, sampling a total of 4% of the total culture volume. Sampled cultures were subjected to various biochemical tests as elaborated below. Negative control was prepared using sterile cultures subjected to the same conditions.

4.4. Ferrous Ion and pH Measurement

Daily samples were flash frozen for end point measurement. The ferrous ion concentration was quantified using 1,10-phenanthrolinet (reaction Equation (3)).

Fe2+ + 3(phen) = [Fe(phen)3]2+ (3)

Samples were tested using a mixture of the sample to 1,10-phenanthroline, ammonium acetate, and sodium fluoride ratio of 1:2:2:5. The mixture was left to incubate in the dark under room temperature for 1 h prior to measurement at absorption wavelength of 492 nm. The ferrous ions formed a stable [Fe(phen)3]2+ complex that was orange in color.

The experimental data of ferrous ion concentration presented in the content have subtracted the value of ferrous ion concentration in the medium at the corresponding time.

The pH was measured directly by a pH meter.

4.5. Bacterial Growth Rate Measurement

Daily microbial samples were subjected to serial dilution conducted in an aseptic environment. Serial dilutions were conducted from 1 to 20 orders of magnitude and spread on LB agar without antibiotics. The agar were incubated at 37 °C overnight. The number of colony forming units (CFU) were recorded along with the dilution factor.

4.6. Determination of Total Ferric(III)oxide Content in Kaolin Clay

The kaolin clay was treated with 37% (w/v) hydrochloric acid for 12 h at room temperature to facilitate ferric(III)oxide reduction within the clay. The resulting solution was added to hydroxylamine hydrochloride at a 1:1 ratio to reduce ferric ions (reaction Equation (4)). Ferrous ions concentration was determined using 1,10-phenanthroline.

2Fe3+ + 2NH2OH·HCl = 2Fe2+ + N2 ↑ + 2H2O + 4H+ + 2Cl (4)

4.7. Determination of Total Reduced Ferric(III)oxide

Ferric(III)oxide or kaolin clay from 14 day cultures were retrieved by centrifugation and washed with ethanol to remove attached microbes. The precipitates were then incubated at 60 °C for 48 to 60 h, until there were no observable changes in weight. The final weight of the retrieved precipitates were compared to the initial weight of ferric(III)oxide/kaolin clay added to the cultures to determine the amount of reduced iron.

4.8. Determination of Microbial Biofilm Formation

Microbial biofilms were stained using crystal violet solution. Briefly, glass surfaces, kaolin clay, or ferric(III)oxide with microbial biofilm growth were stained with crystal violet solution (1 g/L) for 30 min, followed by vigorous washing with distilled water twice. The stained surface was left to dry at 60 °C for 10 h, before being resuspended in 10 mL of absolute ethanol. The resulting solution was measured at an absorption wavelength of 595 nm.

5. Conclusions

The current report presents an initial investigation on bioleaching properties of five different microbial abilities to reduce ferric(III)oxide to ferrous ions. This work aims to identify the conditions governing the ferric(III)oxide reducing properties and use the culturing conditions to map out the potential pathways involved in the ferric(III)oxide reduction. We discovered that Gram-positive microbes B. cereus and S. aureus showed improved reduction compared to the other three microbes. We found that the use of varying culturing conditions impacted the iron-reducing capabilities of the microbes. Comparatively, the use of nitrogen-rich medium elicited ferric reduction by these Gram-positive microbes. Incubated kaolin with B. cereus in nitrogen-rich medium resulted in close to 80% removal of the oxidized iron contaminants, whereas S. aureus removed approximately 30%. The use of these Gram-positive microbes presented limited risk to its users and the environment as the treated kaolin were calcined at high temperatures, rendering these microbes inactive. At present, more studies on the metabolic pathways need to be investigated to fully understand the conditions needed to use these microbes for microbial-based kaolin treatment. It is possible to harness these microbes to efficiently remove the contaminating oxidized iron from kaolin clay using an environmentally friendly manner through a better understanding of the pathway.

Acknowledgments

We thank Xinyi Chen for her comments on the manuscript. We recognize the contributions of students from the Republic Polytechnic of Singapore, particularly Ashray Ramachandran and Tian Lu for their assistance in the early stages of this project.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online, Figure S1: Changes in pH values and growth rates of microbial cultures in LB medium, Figure S2: Changes in pH values and growth rates of B. cereus and S. aureus cultures in 0.1 LB and glucose medium, Figure S3: Biofilm growth in the control group on a glass surface under different culturing conditions, Figure S4: Biofilm formation and culture appearance of B. cereus and S. aureus in different medium.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Z.L. and C.L.H.; methodology, C.L.H., S.H.K. and S.C.; validation, H.J., Z.L. and C.L.H.; formal analysis, H.J.; investigation, H.J., Z.L. and C.L.H.; resources, C.L.H.; writing—original draft preparation, H.J. and C.L.H.; writing—review and editing, C.L.H.; visualization, H.J.; supervision, C.L.H.; project administration, C.L.H.; funding acquisition, C.L.H. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by Innovative Projects for the Characteristics of General Colleges and Universities in Guangdong Province Application (Natural Science), 2018KTSCX200; Shenzhen Institute of Synthetic Biology Innovation Open Fund Contract, DWKF20190001 and the Guangdong Innovative and Entrepreneurial Research Team Program, 2019ZT08Y191.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Supplementary Information is available for this paper at the corresponding webpage.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Sample Availability

Bacillus cereus UKMTAR-4 is available from Sylvia Chieng’s research group. All other samples and strains are available from the Ho Chun Loong’s research group.

Footnotes

Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

  • 1.Murray H.H. Structure and Composition of the Clay Minerals and their Physical and Chemical Properties. In: Murray H.H., editor. Developments in Clay Science. Volume 2. Elsevier; Amsterdam, The Netherlands: 2006. pp. 7–31. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Lee E.Y., Cho K.-S., Wook Ryu H. Microbial refinement of kaolin by iron-reducing bacteria. Appl. Clay Sci. 2002;22:47–53. doi: 10.1016/S0169-1317(02)00111-4. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.He Q.-X., Huang X.-C., Chen Z.-L. Influence of organic acids, complexing agents and heavy metals on the bioleaching of iron from kaolin using Fe(III)-reducing bacteria. Appl. Clay Sci. 2011;51:478–483. doi: 10.1016/j.clay.2011.01.012. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Guo M.-R., Lin Y.-M., Xu X.-P., Chen Z.-L. Bioleaching of iron from kaolin using Fe(III)-reducing bacteria with various carbon nitrogen sources. Appl. Clay Sci. 2010;48:379–383. doi: 10.1016/j.clay.2010.01.010. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Prasad M.S., Reid K.J., Murray H.H. Kaolin: Processing, properties and applications. Appl. Clay Sci. 1991;6:87–119. doi: 10.1016/0169-1317(91)90001-P. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.De Mesquita L.M.S., Rodrigues T., Gomes S.S. Bleaching of Brazilian kaolins using organic acids and fermented medium. Min. Eng. 1996;9:965–971. doi: 10.1016/0892-6875(96)00087-8. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Musiał I., Cibis E., Rymowicz W. Designing a process of kaolin bleaching in an oxalic acid enriched medium by Aspergillus niger cultivated on biodiesel-derived waste composed of glycerol and fatty acids. Appl. Clay Sci. 2011;52:277–284. doi: 10.1016/j.clay.2011.03.004. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Ambikadevi V.R., Lalithambika M. Effect of organic acids on ferric iron removal from iron-stained kaolinite. Appl. Clay Sci. 2000;16:133–145. doi: 10.1016/S0169-1317(99)00038-1. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Cameselle C., Ricart M.T., Núñez M.J., Lema J.M. Iron removal from kaolin. Comparison between “in situ” and “two-stage” bioleaching processes. Hydrometallurgy. 2003;68:97–105. doi: 10.1016/S0304-386X(02)00196-2. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Nealson K.H., Saffarini D. Iron and manganese in anaerobic respiration: Environmental significance, physiology, and regulation. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 1994;48:311–343. doi: 10.1146/annurev.mi.48.100194.001523. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Nealson K.H., Myers C.R. Microbial reduction of manganese and iron: New approaches to carbon cycling. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1992;58:439–443. doi: 10.1128/AEM.58.2.439-443.1992. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Hau H.H., Gralnick J.A. Ecology and biotechnology of the genus Shewanella. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 2007;61:237–258. doi: 10.1146/annurev.micro.61.080706.093257. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Kostka J.E., Stucki J.W., Nealson K.H., Wu J. Reduction of Structural Fe(III) in Smectite by a Pure Culture of Shewanella putrefaciens Strain MR-1. Clays Clay Min. 1996;44:522–529. doi: 10.1346/CCMN.1996.0440411. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Farrell M.J., Finkel S.E. The growth advantage in stationary-phase phenotype conferred by rpoS mutations is dependent on the pH and nutrient environment. J. Bacteriol. 2003;185:7044–7052. doi: 10.1128/JB.185.24.7044-7052.2003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Navarro Llorens J.M., Tormo A., Martínez-García E. Stationary phase in gram-negative bacteria. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 2010;34:476–495. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6976.2010.00213.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Cepl J., Blahůšková A., Cvrčková F., Markoš A. Ammonia produced by bacterial colonies promotes growth of ampicillin-sensitive Serratia sp. by means of antibiotic inactivation. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 2014;354:126–132. doi: 10.1111/1574-6968.12442. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Stucki J.W. Properties and Behaviour of Iron in Clay Minerals. In: Bergaya F., Lagaly G., editors. Developments in Clay Science. Volume 5. Elsevier; Amsterdam, The Netherlands: 2013. pp. 559–611. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Merte L.R., Bechstein R., Peng G., Rieboldt F., Farberow C.A., Zeuthen H., Knudsen J., Lægsgaard E., Wendt S., Mavrikakis M., et al. Water clustering on nanostructured iron oxide films. Nat. Commun. 2014;5:4193. doi: 10.1038/ncomms5193. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Liu Z., Hong C.J., Yang Y., Dai L., Ho C.L. Advances in Bacterial Biofilm Management for Maintaining Microbiome Homeostasis. Biotechnol. J. 2020;15:e1900320. doi: 10.1002/biot.201900320. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Fukushima T., Allred B.E., Sia A.K., Nichiporuk R., Andersen U.N., Raymond K.N. Gram-positive siderophore-shuttle with iron-exchange from Fe-siderophore to apo-siderophore by Bacillus cereus YxeB. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2013;110:13821–13826. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1304235110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Dixon S.D., Janes B.K., Bourgis A., Carlson P.E., Jr., Hanna P.C. Multiple ABC transporters are involved in the acquisition of petrobactin in Bacillus anthracis. Mol. Microbiol. 2012;84:370–382. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2012.08028.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Wilson M.K., Abergel R.J., Raymond K.N., Arceneaux J.E.L., Byers B.R. Siderophores of Bacillus anthracis, Bacillus cereus, and Bacillus thuringiensis. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2006;348:320–325. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2006.07.055. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Koppisch A.T., Dhungana S., Hill K.K., Boukhalfa H., Heine H.S., Colip L.A., Romero R.B., Shou Y., Ticknor L.O., Marrone B.L., et al. Petrobactin is produced by both pathogenic and non-pathogenic isolates of the Bacillus cereus group of bacteria. BioMetals. 2008;21:581–589. doi: 10.1007/s10534-008-9144-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Padan E., Venturi M., Gerchman Y., Dover N. Na+/H+ antiporters. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Bba Bioenerg. 2001;1505:144–157. doi: 10.1016/S0005-2728(00)00284-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Desriac N., Broussolle V., Postollec F., Mathot A.-G., Sohier D., Coroller L., Leguerinel I. Bacillus cereus cell response upon exposure to acid environment: Toward the identification of potential biomarkers. Front. Microbiol. 2013;4:284. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2013.00284. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Ho C.L., Hwang I.Y., Loh K., Chang M.W. Matrix-immobilized yeast for large-scale production of recombinant human lactoferrin. MedChemComm. 2015;6:486–491. doi: 10.1039/C4MD00537F. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Zapotoczna M., Jevnikar Z., Miajlovic H., Kos J., Foster T.J. Iron-regulated surface determinant B (IsdB) promotes Staphylococcus aureus adherence to and internalization by non-phagocytic human cells. Cell. Microbiol. 2013;15:1026–1041. doi: 10.1111/cmi.12097. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Verstraete M.M., Morales L.D., Kobylarz M.J., Loutet S.A., Laakso H.A., Pinter T.B., Stillman M.J., Heinrichs D.E., Murphy M.E.P. The heme-sensitive regulator SbnI has a bifunctional role in staphyloferrin B production by Staphylococcus aureus. J. Biol. Chem. 2019;294:11622–11636. doi: 10.1074/jbc.RA119.007757. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Conroy B.S., Grigg J.C., Kolesnikov M., Morales L.D., Murphy M.E.P. Staphylococcus aureus heme and siderophore-iron acquisition pathways. Biometals. 2019;32:409–424. doi: 10.1007/s10534-019-00188-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Kobylarz M.J., Heieis G.A., Loutet S.A., Murphy M.E.P. Iron Uptake Oxidoreductase (IruO) Uses a Flavin Adenine Dinucleotide Semiquinone Intermediate for Iron-Siderophore Reduction. ACS Chem. Biol. 2017;12:1778–1786. doi: 10.1021/acschembio.7b00203. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Bowman L., Zeden M.S., Schuster C.F., Kaever V., Gründling A. New Insights into the Cyclic Di-adenosine Monophosphate (c-di-AMP) Degradation Pathway and the Requirement of the Cyclic Dinucleotide for Acid Stress Resistance in Staphylococcus aureus. J. Biol. Chem. 2016;291:26970–26986. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M116.747709. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Gertz S., Engelmann S., Schmid R., Ziebandt A.K., Tischer K., Scharf C., Hacker J., Hecker M. Characterization of the sigma(B) regulon in Staphylococcus aureus. J. Bacteriol. 2000;182:6983–6991. doi: 10.1128/JB.182.24.6983-6991.2000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Bischoff M., Dunman P., Kormanec J., Macapagal D., Murphy E., Mounts W., Berger-Bächi B., Projan S. Microarray-based analysis of the Staphylococcus aureus sigmaB regulon. J. Bacteriol. 2004;186:4085–4099. doi: 10.1128/JB.186.13.4085-4099.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Zeden M.S., Kviatkovski I., Schuster C.F., Thomas V.C., Fey P.D., Gründling A. Identification of the main glutamine and glutamate transporters in Staphylococcus aureus and their impact on c-di-AMP production. Mol. Microbiol. 2020;113:1085–1100. doi: 10.1111/mmi.14479. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Data Availability Statement

Supplementary Information is available for this paper at the corresponding webpage.


Articles from Molecules are provided here courtesy of Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI)

RESOURCES