Skip to main content
Cancers logoLink to Cancers
. 2021 May 30;13(11):2704. doi: 10.3390/cancers13112704

Rare Germline Variants in Chordoma-Related Genes and Chordoma Susceptibility

Sally Yepes 1,*, Nirav N Shah 1, Jiwei Bai 2, Hela Koka 1, Chuzhong Li 2, Songbai Gui 2, Mary Lou McMaster 1, Yanzi Xiao 1, Kristine Jones 1,3, Mingyi Wang 1,3, Aurelie Vogt 1,3, Bin Zhu 1, Bin Zhu 1,3, Amy Hutchinson 1,3, Meredith Yeager 1,3, Belynda Hicks 1,3, Brian Carter 4, Neal D Freedman 1, Laura Beane-Freeman 1, Stephen J Chanock 1, Yazhuo Zhang 2, Dilys M Parry 1, Xiaohong R Yang 1,, Alisa M Goldstein 1,*,
Editors: Kari Hemminki, Asta Försti, Richard Houlston
PMCID: PMC8197919  PMID: 34070849

Abstract

Simple Summary

Chordoma is an extremely rare bone cancer that has not been fully characterized and few risk factors have been identified, highlighting the need for improving our understanding of the disease biology. Our study aims to identify chordoma susceptibility genes by investigating 265 genes involved in chordoma-related signaling pathways and other biological processes on germline DNA of 138 chordoma patients of European ancestry compared to internal control datasets and general population databases. Results were intersected with whole genome sequencing data from 80 skull-base chordoma patients of Chinese ancestry. Several rare loss-of-function and predicted deleterious missense variants were enriched in chordoma cases in both datasets, suggesting a complex model of pathways potentially involved in chordoma development and susceptibility, warranting further investigation in larger studies.

Abstract

Background: Chordoma is a rare bone cancer with an unknown etiology. TBXT is the only chordoma susceptibility gene identified to date; germline single nucleotide variants and copy number variants in TBXT have been associated with chordoma susceptibility in familial and sporadic chordoma. However, the genetic susceptibility of chordoma remains largely unknown. In this study, we investigated rare germline genetic variants in genes involved in TBXT/chordoma-related signaling pathways and other biological processes in chordoma patients from North America and China. Methods: We identified variants that were very rare in general population and internal control datasets and showed evidence for pathogenicity in 265 genes in a whole exome sequencing (WES) dataset of 138 chordoma patients of European ancestry and in a whole genome sequencing (WGS) dataset of 80 Chinese patients with skull base chordoma. Results: Rare and likely pathogenic variants were identified in 32 of 138 European ancestry patients (23%), including genes that are part of notochord development, PI3K/AKT/mTOR, Sonic Hedgehog, SWI/SNF complex and mesoderm development pathways. Rare pathogenic variants in COL2A1, EXT1, PDK1, LRP2, TBXT and TSC2, among others, were also observed in Chinese patients. Conclusion: We identified several rare loss-of-function and predicted deleterious missense variants in germline DNA from patients with chordoma, which may influence chordoma predisposition and reflect a complex susceptibility, warranting further investigation in large studies.

Keywords: chordoma, germline variants, notochord development, cancer susceptibility, WES, WGS

1. Introduction

Chordoma is a rare, malignant bone tumor that occurs in the axial skeleton at cranial, spinal and sacral sites. Chordoma tumors are considered slow growing; however, local recurrences are frequent and treatment options are limited, particularly for those with advanced disease, highlighting the need for improving our knowledge of the disease biology and the discovery of novel druggable targets [1,2,3]. The clinical progression of skull base chordoma is highly variable [4] and there are no validated clinical or molecular prognostic markers.

Chordoma is hypothesized to originate from remnants of the notochord, which is a mesodermal structure in the embryo and signal tissues for organization and differentiation. Genes implicated in chordoma formation include the T-brachyury gene (TBXT), which is required for differentiation of the notochord and formation of mesoderm during posterior development [5].

TBXT is the most relevant susceptibility gene identified in chordoma, with germline TBXT duplication conferring susceptibility to familial chordoma [6] (Yang XR et al. 2009) and single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in TBXT associated with chordoma risk in both sporadic and familial chordoma [7,8]. The role of TBXT in disease pathogenesis has also been shown to be critical: TBXT expression is considered as a diagnostic marker for chordoma [9,10] and copy number gains of TBXT have been identified in chordoma tumors [11,12]. Further, chordoma growth in cell models could be inhibited by TBXT silencing [12,13,14].

Despite some progress, etiologic factors and genetic susceptibility of chordoma are not well understood and have not been extensively studied. The goal of this study was to identify and characterize rare and pathogenic germline variants in genes of interest for chordoma pathogenesis through next generation sequencing of 138 chordoma cases of European ancestry. Genes of interest from the initial evaluation were also examined in a set of 80 skull-base chordoma cases from an Asian population for replication. Due to the critical relevance of TBXT in the biological mechanisms of chordoma, we investigated germline variants in genes related to TBXT, as well as other genes involved in mesoderm and notochord development. We also evaluated genes that have been associated with chordoma tumor development, including several members of the SWI/SNF complex, PI3K/AKT/mTOR and Sonic Hedgehog pathways. Using this approach, we identified several potential chordoma susceptibility genes that warrant investigation in future studies.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Populations

The current study included 138 patients of European ancestry from the United States and Canada, processed using whole exome sequencing (WES). All diagnoses of chordoma were confirmed by reviewing pathologic slides or reports, medical records or death certificates.

We used WES data from 598 healthy Caucasian cancer-free unrelated individuals, from the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal and Ovarian Cancer Screening Trial (PLCO) [15] and Cancer Prevention Study (CPS) as reference/controls for comparison with the European ancestry patient samples and for conducting rare variant burden tests. These controls were sequenced and analyzed using the same sequencing platform and ensemble variant calling pipeline used for the European ancestry chordoma cases.

We also analyzed germline whole genome sequencing (WGS) data from 80 Chinese skull-base chordoma patients to evaluate candidate genes identified from our main analysis of the European ancestry chordoma patients. In the Chinese patient cohort, all patients were diagnosed with skull base chordoma and underwent endoscopic endonasal surgeries at the Neurosurgery Department of Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, between October 2010 and November 2017. All methods were performed in accordance with the relevant guidelines and regulations. This research has been approved by the National Cancer Institute (NCI) Institutional Review Board (IRB) (Protocols: 10CN188, 04/08/2020; 78C-0039, 01/08/2021) and the ethics committee of the Beijing Tiantan Hospital (IRB code: 2009-47, 20 December 2009).

2.2. Library Construction, Sequencing and Bioinformatics Analysis

For the European ancestry and Chinese cases, germline genomic DNA was extracted from saliva and peripheral blood. WES was performed at the Cancer Genomics Research Laboratory, National Cancer Institute (CGR, NCI). Briefly, SeqCAP EZ Human Exome Library v3.0 (Roche NimbleGen, Madison, WI, USA) was utilized for exome sequence capture. Exome sequencing was performed to a sufficient depth to achieve a minimum coverage of 15 reads in at least 80% of the coding sequence from the UCSC hg19 transcripts database.

After the exclusion of reads containing adapter contamination and low-quality nucleotides, the data were mapped to the reference human genome (UCSC hg19) using the Burrows–Wheeler Aligner software [16]. SAMtools [17], Picard and GATK [18] were used to sort aligned files and perform base quality recalibration, duplicate reads removal and local realignment to generate final BAM files for mutation calling.

Three variant callers, GATK HaplotyperCaller, UnifiedGenotyper and FreeBayes [19], were used to call germline variants. We included all target regions, as well as a 250 bp flanking region on each side. An ensemble variant calling pipeline was then implemented to integrate the analysis results from the above mentioned three callers. Subsequently, the ensemble variant calling pipeline that applies a support-vector machine (SVM) learning algorithm was used to identify an optimal decision boundary based on the variant calling results out of the multiple variant callers to produce a more balanced decision between false positives and true positives.

For the Chinese cases, WGS was carried out by the Novogene Corporation (Beijing, China) on the Illumina HiSeq X platform with an average depth of 41X. Variant calling, QC and filtering steps were conducted by CGR, NCI, using similar approaches as those used for WES of the European ancestry chordoma samples.

Gene prioritization: We assembled a set of 265 genes chosen from the published literature for their role in chordoma physiopathology. The following functional categories were included: TBXT super-enhancer associated genes and chordoma essentiality genes, which are essential for the proliferation and survival of cancer cells in CRISPR-CAS9 screens, notochord related genes, key genes in mesoderm commitment pathway, SWI/SNF complex, PI3K/Akt/mTOR pathway and Sonic Hedgehog pathway. Variants were filtered based on quality control measures, frequency of minor allele in populations and pathogenicity criteria.

Variants quality control: Filtering of WES variants was based on the following criteria: Variants flagged with our pipeline quality control metric (CScorefilter), read depth <10, ABHet <0.2 or >0.8, or called by only one of the three variant callers used were excluded. Only non-synonymous variants, including frameshift, stop/gain, inframe deletion or insertion, missense and splicing site variants, were studied.

Frequency and specificity: Variants were excluded if both of the following criteria were met: (1) they had a minor allele frequency (MAF) of >0.001 in any of the consulted population databases (the 1000 Genomes Project, Exome Sequencing Project (ESP6500) and Exome Aggregation Consortium (ExAC) in European population); (2) they were observed in >2 families from an in-house database (CGR, NCI) of ~2000 exomes in ~1000 cancer-prone families, excluding chordoma cancer families.

Pathogenicity evidence and in silico analysis: Variants passing quality control and frequency filters in both datasets were evaluated for pathogenicity. Variants were studied further if classified as one of the following: (1) High impact variants (frameshift indels, stop gain/loss, or known splice sites). (2) Missense variants with evidence of pathogenicity based on 3 in silico predictions (Meta Likelihood ratio: D, METASVM: D and CADD: ≥ 20). The first two in silico algorithms are ensemble prediction scores that incorporate results from nine algorithms (SIFT, PolyPhen-2, GERP ++, Mutation Taster, Mutation Assessor, FATHMM, LRT, SiPhy and PhyloP) and allele frequency [20]. (3) Variants classified as pathogenic (P) or likely pathogenic (LP) by ClinVar [21]. (4) Disease-causing mutation (DM) by HGMD [22]. Details of the criteria for classification of pathogenicity are shown in Supplementary Table S1 [23].

Similar filtering as described for the European ancestry dataset was performed in the Chinese dataset processed with WGS. For this latter dataset, only protein-coding genes, for which potentially pathogenic variants were observed in the European ancestry dataset, were considered. Variants were excluded based on MAF of >0.001 in any of the databases in any population, including East Asian. Pathogenicity evidence and in silico analysis were performed as described above for the European ancestry dataset.

2.3. Rare Variant Burden Test

We conducted rare variant burden tests for genes with rare and potentially pathogenic variants identified from the European ancestry cohort in 138 chordoma patients and 598 non-cancer control samples from the PLCO and CPS-II studies with European ancestry and processed at CGR, NCI. We used SKAT-O statistics [24], which is a linear combination of the burden test (aimed to test effect size of variants with the same direction in cases and controls) and variance component test (designed to test effect size of variants with different directions in cases and controls).

3. Results

The main analysis included 138 European ancestry patients; the average age at diagnosis was 46.9 years (range 7–78) and the ratio of male to female patients was 0.7. The vast majority of patients (97%) had classic chordoma histology. The chordoma site distribution was 55.7% skull base, 23% spinal and 20.3% sacral. The Chinese cases were all skull base chordoma, with a mean age of 44.7 (7–79) years, the majority being male (62.5%) and having classic chordoma histology (80%).

We assembled a set of 265 genes chosen from the published literature for their role in chordoma physiopathology, including TBXT super-enhancer associated genes and chordoma essentiality genes in CRISPR-CAS9 screens (26), notochord related genes (21), mesoderm commitment pathway (166), SWI/SNF complex (18), PI3K/Akt/mTOR pathway (33) and Sonic Hedgehog pathway (28). Some of these genes are present in more than one category (Supplementary Table S2). Figure 1 shows the stepwise pipeline used for selecting, prioritizing and filtering the genes and variants for the evaluation.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Overview of study samples and prioritization pipeline to evaluate rare and potentially pathogenic variants in genes of interest for chordoma.

We identified 34 potentially pathogenic variants (7 loss of function and 27 missense variants) in 2 notochord development genes, 4 Sonic Hedgehog pathway genes, 16 mesoderm commitment pathway genes, 4 PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway genes, 2 SWI/SNF complex pathway genes, 2 TBXT super-enhancer genes and 1 driver gene (Table 1). These variants were identified in 32 of 138 European ancestry patients (23%). Table 1 and Table 2 show patients’ characteristics, the type, location and frequencies of these variants, evidence for pathogenicity and the involved pathways/biologic processes. Supplementary Tables S3 and S4 show details of the variants identified in the European ancestry and Chinese datasets, respectively.

Table 1.

Information on rare variants identified in the European ancestry patients after the prioritization procedure.

ID Gender Age Morphology Site Gene Chr Location SNP IDS REF VAR Variant
Type
Protein
Change
Variant
Impact
Pathogenecity Prediction a HGMD/
ClinVar
MAF in Control Datasets Pathway/Process
METASVM METALR CADD gnomAD Exomes NFE b gnomAD Genomes NFE c
1004 Female NA Conventional 1 ATP8B2 1 154305114 G T missense Arg210Leu moderate D D 34 1.06 × 10−5 Mesoderm commitment
1101 Male 37.2 Conventional 2 LYST 1 235922291 G A stop_gained Arg2288 * high Driver
1164 Male 29.7 Conventional 1 TCF7L1 2 85529694 rs147750102 G A missense Gly205Ser moderate D D 22.4 9.67 × 10−5 6.49 × 10−5 Mesoderm commitment
1040 Female 32.7 Conventional 1 EPB41L5 2 120776677 rs200315720 G A missense Arg6His moderate D D 29.9 1.98 × 10−4 1.30 × 10−4 Mesoderm commitment
1020 Female 39.0 Conventional 1 EPB41L5 2 120833086 rs766560121 C A missense Leu148Ile moderate D D 28.9 0 Mesoderm commitment
3001 NA NA NA NA LRP2 2 170038097 rs137983840 C T missense Ala3344Thr moderate D D 26.3 6.16 × 10−5 6.48 × 10−5 Sonic Hedgehog
1035 Female 26.1 Chondroid 1 PDK1 2 173460594 T frameshift & stop_gained Asn424fs high PI3K/AKT/mTOR
1111 Male 51.3 Chondroid 1 NFE2L2 2 178095743 C A missense Asp530Tyr moderate D D 22.5 Mesoderm commitment
1014 Female 44.3 Conventional 1 BMPR2 2 203420750 rs146310981 G A missense Val788Ile moderate D D 22.7 3.52 × 10−5 Mesoderm commitment
1139 Female 39.5 Conventional 1 RARB 3 25611341 A G missense Thr188Ala moderate D D 22.9 8.79 × 10−6 Mesoderm commitment
1053 Female 54.6 Conventional 1 HHIP 4 145581068 ACAC frameshift Phe304fs high 0 Sonic Hedgehog
1127 Male 50.7 Conventional 3 SRF 6 43146888 rs765592889 T C missense Val496Ala moderate D D 22.4 1.76 × 10−5 Mesoderm commitment
1048/
5320
NA NA NA NA TBXT 6 166571981 rs368179445 C T missense Arg377Gln moderate D D 25.5 0 T super-enhancer
1080 Female 47.4 Conventional 1 ATP6V1B2 8 20068082 C T missense & splice region Arg130Trp moderate D D 35 0 T super-enhancer
1161 Male 78.3 Conventional 1 EXT1 8 118832021 rs145720047 G C missense Pro477Arg moderate D D 22.4 1.24 × 10−4 6.48 × 10−5 Mesoderm commitment
1001 Female 47.0 Conventional 1 DEPTOR 8 120977595 A frameshift Glu185fs high PI3K/AKT/mTOR
1034 Female 51.0 Conventional 2 SMARCA2 9 2039568 rs774084308 C T missense Pro153Leu moderate D D 22.2 0 SWI/SNF complex
1080 Female 47.4 Conventional 1 JAK2 9 5078325 A G missense His671Arg moderate D D 21.7 Mesoderm commitment
1154 Female 44.1 Conventional 2 PTCH1 9 98209505 rs556901417 G A missense Arg1345Cys moderate D D 25.2 1.09 × 10−4 3.89 × 10−4 Sonic Hedgehog
1042 Female 39.5 Conventional 1 SUFU 10 104309821 rs34406289 G A missense Ala138Thr moderate D D 33 2.64 × 10−5 0 Sonic Hedgehog
1141 Female 57.6 Conventional 3 SUFU 10 104375030 rs79299301 G A missense Arg343His moderate D D 20.8 1.58 × 10−4 6.49 × 10−5 Sonic Hedgehog
1006 Male 46.2 Conventional 1 PAX6 11 31823215 A T missense Val98Glu moderate D D 27.5 Mesoderm commitment
1162 Female 66.4 Conventional 3 EXT2 11 44254000 rs138495222 C T missense Thr620Met moderate D D 34 DM 9.24 × 10−4 8.43 × 10−4 Mesoderm commitment
1090 Female 28.3 Conventional 1 GDF3 12 7842985 rs146973734 C T missense Arg195Gln moderate T T 0.004 P/DM 1.85 × 10−4 5.84 × 10−4 Notochord development
1001 Female 47.0 Conventional 1 COL2A1 12 48380213 rs201823490 G A missense Pro478Leu moderate D D 23.7 0 0 Notochord development
1113 Female 27.8 Conventional 1 SOX21 13 95364265 G C missense Asn13Lys moderate D D 21.6 Mesoderm commitment
1050 Male 60.3 Conventional 2 WDHD1 14 55462357 rs556223202 G A stop_gained Arg373 * high 8.88 × 10−6 Mesoderm commitment
1127 Male 50.7 Conventional 3 AKT1 14 105246527 rs397514644 G A missense Arg25Cys moderate D T 29.6 P/DM PI3K/AKT/mTOR
1091 Female 69.9 Conventional 2 TSC2 16 2130319 C T missense Ala1184Val moderate D D 24 3.56 × 10−5 PI3K/AKT/mTOR
1028 Female 39.7 Conventional 1 TSC2 16 2136297 rs373635516 C T missense Pro1589Leu moderate D D 21.9 0 PI3K/AKT/mTOR
1006 Male 46.2 Conventional 1 ACACA 17 35603791 A T missense Val804Glu moderate D D 23.7 Mesoderm commitment
1114 Male 44.4 Conventional 1 PRKACA 19 14203391 rs41296324 A T stop_lost Ter125Lysext * high 0 2.60 × 10−4 Mesoderm commitment
1045 Female 31.2 Conventional 1 FOXA2 20 22563180 C T missense Gly234Ser moderate D D 22.3 Mesoderm commitment
1098 Female 13.8 Conventional 3 SMARCB1 22 24129394 AA frameshift Lys13fs high SWI/SNF complex

Site: 1, bones of skull and face and associate joints; 2, pelvic bones, sacrum and coccyx and associated joints; 3, vertebral column. Chr, chromosome; REF, reference allele; VAR, variant allele; Freq, frequency; MAF, minor allele frequency; T, tolerant; D, deleterious; P, pathogenic; DM, disease-causing mutation. a Pathogenicity prediction for missense variants based on in silico algorithms, METALR and METASVM, which are ensemble prediction scores that incorporate results from nine algorithms and allele frequency. CADD was also applied. b,c Genome Aggregation Database (gnomAD) exomes and genomes, respectively, in non-Finnish European population (NFE).

Table 2.

Potentially pathogenic variants in the Chinese dataset.

ID Gender Age Morphology Gene Chr Location SNP IDS REF VAR Variant
Type
Protein
Change
Variant
Impact
Pathogenecity Prediction a HGMD/
ClinVar
MAF in Control Datasets Pathway/Process
METASVM METALR CADD gnomAD Exomes EAS b gnomAD Genomes EAS c
1804 M 65 Conventional ATP8B2 1 154317567 A C missense Lys836Gln moderate D D 26.2 1.74 × 10−4 0 Mesoderm commitment
1686 M 64 Conventional LRP2 2 170033035 C T missense Gly3486Glu moderate D D 33 0 0 Sonic Hedgehog
1372 NA NA NA LRP2 2 170062924 rs577943281 T A missense Thr2436Ser moderate D D 22.7 2.90 × 10−4 6.17 × 10−4 Sonic Hedgehog
1964 M 24 Chondroid LRP2 2 170055366 rs755215116 A C missense Ile2836Met moderate D D 24.2 3.66 × 10−3 6.17 × 10−4 Sonic Hedgehog
1442 NA NA NA PDK1 2 173460575 rs745678398 A G structural interaction High 0 0 PI3K/AKT/mTOR
1886 F 62 Conventional TCF7L1 2 85536476 C T missense Thr553Ile moderate D D 23 5.82 × 10−5 0 Mesoderm commitment
1790 M 65 Conventional TCF7L1 2 85531113 rs373770977 G A missense Val252Ile moderate D D 23.4 1.25 × 10−4 0 Mesoderm commitment
1779 M 47 Conventional TCF7L1 2 85536536 rs555810312 C T missense Pro573Leu moderate D D 23.2 4.19 × 10−4 0 Mesoderm commitment
2011 F 7 Conventional TBXT 6 166581010 rs563349798 C G missense Val24Leu moderate D D 29.7 0 0 T super-enhancer
1686 M 64 Conventional EXT1 8 118819501 rs753261171 G A missense Thr613Met moderate D D 33 0 0 Mesoderm commitment
776 M 54 Conventional SUFU 10 104309738 C T structural interaction High 5.80 × 10−5 0 Sonic Hedgehog
1921 M 57 Conventional EXT2 11 44193231 rs767085143 A G missense Asn448Ser moderate D D 24.3 2.90 × 10−4 0 Mesoderm commitment
1372 NA NA NA COL2A1 12 48369322 rs995646562 C T missense Ala1222Thr moderate D D 24.1 0 0 Notochord development
1909 M 26 Conventional COL2A1 12 48372528 G T missense Pro916His moderate D D 25 0 0 Notochord development
1936 F 71 Conventional TSC2 16 2134572 rs45517338 C G missense Pro1450Arg moderate D D 25.8 2.35 × 10−4 0 PI3K/AKT/mTOR
1417 M 59 Conventional TSC2 16 2134572 rs45517338 C G missense Pro1450Arg moderate D D 25.8 2.35 × 10−4 0 PI3K/AKT/mTOR
1979 M 59 Chondroid TSC2 16 2121610 rs45509392 G A missense Asp647Asn moderate D D 32 DM 5.80 × 10−4 0 PI3K/AKT/mTOR
1570 M 24 Chondroid TSC2 16 2121610 rs45509392 G A missense Asp647Asn moderate D D 32 DM 5.80 × 10−4 0 PI3K/AKT/mTOR
462 F 62 Conventional TSC2 16 2121610 rs45509392 G A missense Asp647Asn moderate D D 32 DM 5.80 × 10−4 0 PI3K/AKT/mTOR
1084 NA NA NA ACACA 17 35549102 rs772483773 C T missense Val1449Met moderate D D 25.2 6.96 × 10−4 6.17 × 10−4 Mesoderm commitment

Chr, chromosome; REF, reference allele; VAR, variant allele; Freq, frequency; MAF, minor allele frequency; T, tolerant; D, deleterious; P, pathogenic; DM, disease-causing mutation. a Pathogenicity prediction for missense variants based on in silico algorithms, METALR and METASVM, which are ensemble prediction scores that incorporate results from nine algorithms and allele frequency. CADD was also applied. b,c Genome Aggregation Database (gnomAD) exomes and genomes, respectively, in East Asian population. Structural interaction: variants that impact the internal interactions of the resulting polypeptide structure.

Several variants were classified as DM/P by HGMD/ClinVar, such as GDF3 (rs146973734), AKT1 (rs397514644) and EXT2 (rs138495222). Many of the variants were either extremely rare in the general population or absent from the internal control samples and population databases such as variants identified in TBXT, ATP6V1B2 and COL2A1.

Burden test: To identify genes with a higher genetic burden of rare variants, we conducted a rare variant burden test of the 265 genes by comparing cases to controls of the same ancestry and sequenced using similar analytics and pipelines. Burden tests were performed in several different ways: (1) analyzing all rare variants in a targeted gene; (2) examining only rare pathogenic variants in a targeted gene; (3) examining all genes in a process or pathway. The small number of cases carrying variants in the same genes limited the power to evaluate statistical significance for individual genes. As a result, none of the examined genes showed statistical significance after correction for multiple testing (Supplementary Table S5). However, fourteen rare pathogenic variants were found only in chordoma cases and were absent from all 598 controls (variants in these genes: AKT1, ATP6V1B2, DEPTOR, FOXA2, HHIP, NFE2L2, PAX6, PDK1, PRKACA, PTCH1, SMARCB1, SOX21, SOX9 and TBXT). Evaluation of the biologic processes or pathways showed suggestive evidence for association only for the notochord-related genes (SKATO P = 0.06; Burden P = 0.03).

We investigated the 31 genes (see Table 1) identified in the main analysis in an independent dataset of 80 Chinese chordoma cases. After applying the same filtering criteria as for the main analysis (see methods), we identified rare pathogenic variants in 11 genes in 18 of 80 (22.5%) Chinese patients. Most variants were very rare, with MAFs ranging between 1.74 E–04 and zero in all control databases (Table 2). Although most genes/variants were observed in only a single Chinese chordoma case, multiple potentially pathogenic variants were observed in COL2A1, LRP2, TCF7L1 and TSC2. In particular, the two variants in TSC2 were observed in two (g. 2134572) or three (g. 2121610) different patients, respectively. Further, the TSC2 variant observed in three Chinese chordoma cases was classified as DM by HGMD (Table 2).

4. Discussion

In this study, we investigated the role of rare germline variants in genes involved in chordoma related processes/pathways in sporadic chordoma patients from a European ancestry and a Chinese population. We identified a number of rare loss-of-function and predicted deleterious missense variants that were enriched in chordoma cases, suggesting some of these genes may contribute to chordoma susceptibility.

Genes with rare germline variants enriched in chordoma cases were involved in signaling pathways and physiopathological processes that are affected in chordoma at the somatic level (e.g., notochord development, PI3K/AKT/mTOR and SWI/SNF pathways), which underscores the importance of pathway/process-level analysis of germline alterations to identify potentially novel genes. Increasing evidence suggests that specific germline variants might determine which somatic events and mutations are generated and selected in cancer cells during tumorigenesis, such as mutational signatures, allele-specific copy number changes, or altered signaling pathways [25].

Overall, we report that ~23% of chordoma cases from two independent populations carried rare germline variants that are potentially pathogenic in selected genes. Eleven genes were shared by the two datasets, including COL2A1 (notochord), EXT1 (mesoderm development), PDK1 (PI3K/Akt/mTOR) and LRP2 (Sonic Hedgehog) and thus worthy of additional studies.

Some of the genes identified in this study have previously demonstrated important biological functions relevant to chordoma development. For example, a recent study found that TBXT is associated with a 1.5 Mb region containing “super-enhancers” and is the most highly expressed super-enhancer-associated transcription factor [26]. ATP6V1B2 was among the genes that were considered as both super-enhancer-associated and essential for chordoma cell viability. sgRNA-mediated TBXT repression experiments have been shown to reduce the expression of this gene and the direct binding of TBXT at the ATP6V1B2 locus has been demonstrated [26]. COL2A1 was also shown to be down-regulated by TBXT expression in a clival chordoma cell line (UM-Chor1) [26]. Interestingly, Col2a1-null mice lack intervertebral discs and cannot remove the notochord [27], suggesting the potential importance of this gene in chordoma development. We also identified rare variants in SHH, a member of the Sonic Hedgehog pathway, which is secreted by fetal notochord and participates in vertebrate patterning of the neural tube during embryonic development via binding to its ligand PTCH1. Interestingly, Shh-expressing notochord cells remain in the vertebral column after embryonic development ends, resembling notochord remnants [28] and suggesting that it may cause transformation of this remnant tissue.

The SMARCB1 gene is a critical component of the SWI/SNF chromatin-remodeling complex which antagonizes the histone methyltransferase EZH2, a molecule that is being targeted by several inhibitors in clinical trials [29]. Inactivation of SMARCB1 has been described as a critical event in various tumors, including malignant rhabdoid tumors and epithelioid sarcoma [30]. Loss of SMARCB1 expression in chordoma has also been identified in poorly differentiated chordomas [31]. Recently, other components of SWI/SNF complex have also been implicated in chordoma pathogenesis, such as PBRM1 as a potential driver gene for chordoma [11].

PI3K/Akt/mTOR signaling in the context of chordoma was first suggested after numerous reports of chordoma tumors in individuals with tuberous sclerosis complex (TSC). Chordoma also occurs in association with TSC, an autosomal dominant neurocutaneous syndrome characterized by abnormal tissue growth in multiple organ systems caused by inactivating germline mutations in either TSC1 or TSC2 [32]. None of the patients in our study with TSC variants have clinical manifestations of TSC. Nevertheless, mutations in PI3K/AKT/mTOR genes have been reported in chordoma tumors with potential therapeutic relevance [11].

The strengths of our study include the careful and comprehensive literature review to select chordoma candidate genes, the evaluation of germline rare variants in two independent chordoma sequencing datasets and the inclusion of controls without cancer from the same population ancestry as our European ancestry chordoma cases that were processed using the same platforms and bioinformatics pipeline. However, we cannot rule out the possibility that other genes, including cancer-predisposing genes, may also play a role in susceptibility.

The main limitation of our study is the relatively small number of chordoma cases in each dataset to statistically test case-control differences at an individual gene level, with most variants found only in single chordoma cases. In addition, we were unable to assess family history for most cases. There was also limited representation of histological subtypes for statistical evaluation of association with the variants identified.

In this study, approximately 23% of patients with chordoma from two different population had rare pathogenic/likely pathogenic variants in various biological processes, suggesting a complex model of pathways potentially important for susceptibility and development, including notochord development, PI3K/AKT/mTOR, Sonic Hedgehog and SWI/SNF complex. Future large studies, particularly at the consortium level, are needed to follow up on our findings for a better understanding of genetic susceptibility of this extremely rare cancer.

5. Conclusions

Our study searched for germline variants in signaling pathways and other biological processes previously identified in the disease’s pathogenesis in patients from two independent populations. We identified rare loss-of-function and predicted deleterious missense variants enriched in chordoma cases, suggesting a complex model of pathways potentially involved in chordoma development and susceptibility. Further evaluation of the identified candidate genes is needed to determine their importance in chordoma risk.

Acknowledgments

This work utilized the computational resources of the NIH high performance computational capabilities Biowulf cluster (http://hpc.nih.gov).

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/cancers13112704/s1, Supplementary Table S1: Details of the criteria for classification of pathogenicity categories, Supplementary Table S2: Genes evaluated in this study and their biological functions, Supplementary Table S3: Details of variants identified in the European ancestry dataset, Supplementary Table S4: Details of potentially pathogenic variants in the Chinese dataset, Supplementary Table S5: Top genes with higher burden of variants.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, S.Y., J.B., X.R.Y. and A.M.G.; formal analysis, S.Y., N.N.S., H.K., Y.X. and M.W.; investigation, S.Y., J.B., C.L., S.G., M.L.M., K.J., M.W., A.V., B.Z. (Bin Zhu 1), B.Z. (Bin Zhu 2), A.H., M.Y., B.H., B.C., N.D.F., L.B.-F., S.J.C., Y.Z., D.M.P., X.R.Y. and A.M.G.; resources, J.B., C.L., S.G., B.C., N.D.F., L.B.-F., Y.Z., X.R.Y. and A.M.G.; supervision, X.R.Y. and A.M.G.; writing—original draft, S.Y., J.B., X.R.Y. and A.M.G.; writing—review and editing, S.Y., N.N.S., J.B., H.K., C.L., S.G., M.L.M., Y.X., K.J., M.W., A.V., B.Z. (Bin Zhu 1), B.Z. (Bin Zhu 2), A.H., M.Y., B.H., B.C., N.D.F., L.B.-F., S.J.C., Y.Z., D.M.P., X.R.Y. and A.M.G. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the Intramural Research Program of the NIH, NCI, DCEG. Part of this research was supported by Beijing Municipal Science and Technology Commission (Z171100000117002), Research Special Fund for Public Welfare Industry of Health (201402008).

Institutional Review Board Statement

All subjects gave their informed consent for inclusion before they participated in the study. The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and the protocol was approved by the Ethics Committee of the National Cancer Institute (NCI) Institutional Review Board (IRB) (Protocols: 10CN188, 04/08/2020; 78C-0039, 01/08/2021) and the ethics committee of the Beijing Tiantan Hospital (IRB code: 2009-47, 20 December 2009).

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Data Availability Statement

According to US NIH policy, the exome sequencing data for the European ancestry dataset will be released to the database of Genotypes and Phenotypes (dbGAP).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Footnotes

Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

  • 1.Wasserman J.K., Gravel D., Purgina B. Chordoma of the Head and Neck: A Review. Head Neck Pathol. 2018;12:261–268. doi: 10.1007/s12105-017-0860-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Stacchiotti S., Sommer J. Building a global consensus approach to chordoma: A position paper from the medical and patient community. Lancet Oncol. 2015;16:e71–e83. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(14)71190-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Stacchiotti S., Gronchi A., Fossati P., Akiyama T., Alapetite C., Baumann M., Blay J.Y., Bolle S., Boriani S., Bruzzi P., et al. Best practices for the management of local-regional recurrent chordoma: A position paper by the Chordoma Global Consensus Group. Ann. Oncol. 2017;28:1230–1242. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdx054. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Jones P.S., Aghi M.K., Muzikansky A., Shih H.A., Barker F.G., Curry W.T. Outcomes and patterns of care in adult skull base chordomas from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. J. Clin. Neurosci. 2014;21:1490–1496. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2014.02.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Kispert A., Koschorz B., Herrmann B.G. The T protein encoded by Brachyury is a tissue-specific transcription factor. EMBO J. 1995;14:4763–4772. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1995.tb00158.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Yang X.R., Ng D., Alcorta D.A., Liebsch N.J., Sheridan E., Li S., Goldstein A.M., Parry D.M., Kelley M. T (brachyury) gene duplication confers major susceptibility to familial chordoma. Nat. Genet. 2009;41:1176–1178. doi: 10.1038/ng.454. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Pillay N., Plagnol V., Tarpey P.S., Lobo S.B., Presneau N., Szuhai K., Halai D., Berisha F., Cannon S.R., Mead S., et al. A common single-nucleotide variant in T is strongly associated with chordoma. Nat. Genet. 2012;44:1185–1187. doi: 10.1038/ng.2419. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Kelley M., Shi J., Ballew B., Hyland P.L., Li W.-Q., Rotunno M., Alcorta D.A., Liebsch N.J., Mitchell J., Bass S., et al. Characterization of T gene sequence variants and germline duplications in familial and sporadic chordoma. Qual. Life Res. 2014;133:1289–1297. doi: 10.1007/s00439-014-1463-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Vujovic S., Henderson S., Presneau N., Odell E., Jacques T.S., Tirabosco R., Boshoff C., Flanagan A.M. Brachyury, a crucial regulator of notochordal development, is a novel biomarker for chordomas. J. Pathol. 2006;209:157–165. doi: 10.1002/path.1969. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Palena C., Polev D.E., Tsang K.Y., Fernando R.I., Litzinger M., Krukovskaya L.L., Baranova A.V., Kozlov A.P., Schlom J. The Human T-Box Mesodermal Transcription Factor Brachyury Is a Candidate Target for T-Cell–Mediated Cancer Immunotherapy. Clin. Cancer Res. 2007;13:2471–2478. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-06-2353. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Tarpey P.S., Behjati S., Young M.D., Martincorena I., Alexandrov L.B., Farndon S.J., Guzzo C., Hardy C., Latimer C., Butler A.P., et al. The driver landscape of sporadic chordoma. Nat. Commun. 2017;8:1–6. doi: 10.1038/s41467-017-01026-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Presneau N., Shalaby A., Ye H., Pillay N., Halai D., Idowu B., Tirabosco R., Whitwell D., Jacques T.S., Kindblom L.G., et al. Role of the transcription factor T (brachyury) in the pathogenesis of sporadic chordoma: A genetic and functional-based study. J. Pathol. 2011;223:327–335. doi: 10.1002/path.2816. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Hsu W., Mohyeldin A., Shah S.R., Ap Rhys C.M., Johnson L.F., Sedora-Roman N.I., Kosztowski T.A., Awad O.A., McCarthy E.F., Loeb D.M., et al. Generation of chordoma cell line JHC7 and the identification of Brachyury as a novel molecular target. J. Neurosurg. 2011;115:760–769. doi: 10.3171/2011.5.JNS11185. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Shah S.R., David J., Tippens N.D., Mohyeldin A., Martinez-Gutierrez J.C., Ganaha S., Schiapparelli P., Hamilton D.H., Palena C., Levchenko A., et al. Brachyury-YAP Regulatory Axis Drives Stemness and Growth in Cancer. Cell Rep. 2017;21:495–507. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2017.09.057. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Gohagan J.K., Prorok P.C., Hayes R.B., Kramer B.S. The Prostate, Lung, Colorectal and Ovarian (PLCO) Cancer Screening Trial of the National Cancer Institute: History, organization, and status. Control. Clin. Trials. 2000;21:251S–272S. doi: 10.1016/S0197-2456(00)00097-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Li H., Durbin R. Fast and accurate short read alignment with Burrows-Wheeler transform. Bioinformatics. 2009;25:1754–1760. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp324. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Li H., Handsaker B., Wysoker A., Fennell T., Ruan J., Homer N., Marth G., Abecasis G., Durbin R., 1000 Genome Project Data Processing Subgroup The Sequence Alignment/Map Format and SAMtools. Bioinformatics. 2009;25:2078–2079. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp352. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.McKenna A., Hanna M., Banks E., Sivachenko A., Cibulskis K., Kernytsky A., Garimella K., Altshuler D., Gabriel S., Daly M., et al. The Genome Analysis Toolkit: A MapReduce framework for analyzing next-generation DNA sequencing data. Genome Res. 2010;20:1297–1303. doi: 10.1101/gr.107524.110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Garrison E., Marth G. Haplotype-based variant detection from short-read sequencing. arXiv. 20121207.3907 [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Dong C., Wei P., Jian X., Gibbs R., Boerwinkle E., Wang K., Liu X. Comparison and integration of deleteriousness prediction methods for nonsynonymous SNVs in whole exome sequencing studies. Hum. Mol. Genet. 2015;24:2125–2137. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddu733. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Landrum M.J., Chitipiralla S., Brown G.R., Chen C., Gu B., Hart J., Hoffman D., Jang W., Kaur K., Liu C., et al. ClinVar: Improvements to accessing data. Nucleic Acids Res. 2020;48:D835–D844. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkz972. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Stenson P.D., Mort M., Ball E.V., Shaw K., Phillips A.D., Cooper D.N. The Human Gene Mutation Database: Building a comprehensive mutation repository for clinical and molecular genetics, diagnostic testing and personalized genomic medicine. Qual. Life Res. 2014;133:1–9. doi: 10.1007/s00439-013-1358-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Mirabello L., Zhu B., Koster R., Karlins E., Dean M., Yeager M., Gianferante M., Spector L., Morton L.M., Karyadi D., et al. Frequency of Pathogenic Germline Variants in Cancer-Susceptibility Genes in Patients With Osteosarcoma. JAMA Oncol. 2020;6:724–734. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2020.0197. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Lee S., Emond M.J., Bamshad M.J., Barnes K.C., Rieder M.J., Nickerson D.A., Christiani D.C., Wurfel M.M., Lin X. Optimal Unified Approach for Rare-Variant Association Testing with Application to Small-Sample Case-Control Whole-Exome Sequencing Studies. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 2012;91:224–237. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2012.06.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Ramroop J.R., Gerber M.M., Toland A.E. Germline Variants Impact Somatic Events during Tumorigenesis. Trends Genet. 2019;35:515–526. doi: 10.1016/j.tig.2019.04.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Sharifnia T., Wawer M.J., Chen T., Huang Q.-Y., Weir B.A., Sizemore A., Lawlor M.A., Goodale A., Cowley G.S., Vazquez F., et al. Small-molecule targeting of brachyury transcription factor addiction in chordoma. Nat. Med. 2019;25:292–300. doi: 10.1038/s41591-018-0312-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Aszódi A., Chan D., Hunziker E., Bateman J.F., Fässler R. Collagen II Is Essential for the Removal of the Notochord and the Formation of Intervertebral Discs. J. Cell Biol. 1998;143:1399–1412. doi: 10.1083/jcb.143.5.1399. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Choi K.-S., Cohn M.J., Harfe B.D. Identification of nucleus pulposus precursor cells and notochordal remnants in the mouse: Implications for disk degeneration and chordoma formation. Dev. Dyn. 2008;237:3953–3958. doi: 10.1002/dvdy.21805. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Knutson S.K., Warholic N.M., Wigle T.J., Klaus C.R., Allain C.J., Raimondi A., Scott M.P., Chesworth R., Moyer M.P., Copeland R.A., et al. Durable tumor regression in genetically altered malignant rhabdoid tumors by inhibition of methyltransferase EZH2. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2013;110:7922–7927. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1303800110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Hollmann T.J., Hornick J.L. INI1-deficient tumors: Diagnostic features and molecular genetics. Am. J. Surg. Pathol. 2011;35:e47–e63. doi: 10.1097/PAS.0b013e31822b325b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Yadav R., Sharma M.C., Malgulwar P.B., Pathak P., Sigamani E., Suri V., Sarkar C., Kumar A., Singh M., Sharma B.S., et al. Prognostic value of MIB-1, p53, epidermal growth factor receptor, and INI1 in childhood chordomas. Neuro-Oncology. 2013;16:372–381. doi: 10.1093/neuonc/not228. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.McMaster M.L., Goldstein A.M., Parry D.M. Clinical features distinguish childhood chordoma associated with tuberous sclerosis complex (TSC) from chordoma in the general paediatric population. J. Med Genet. 2011;48:444–449. doi: 10.1136/jmg.2010.085092. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Data Availability Statement

According to US NIH policy, the exome sequencing data for the European ancestry dataset will be released to the database of Genotypes and Phenotypes (dbGAP).


Articles from Cancers are provided here courtesy of Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI)

RESOURCES