Abstract
Background
Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is associated with cardiovascular disease (CKD), mineral and bone disorder (CKD-MBD) and high mortality. Bone-related factors such as osteopontin (OPN), osteocalcin (OC), osteoprotegerin (OPG) and fibroblast growth factor 23 (FGF23) were linked to cardiovascular complications of CKD and are expected to have predictive value in CKD patients.
Purpose
The aim of this study was to assess the relationship of OPN, OC, OPG and FGF23 to clinical characteristics and to evaluate their ability to predict mortality in patients with different CKD stages.
Methods
The following study groups were enrolled: subjects with end-stage renal disease (38 ESRD), CKD stages 3 and 4 (19 CKD3-4) and non-CKD controls (19), respectively. Blood was withdrawn once to perform the measurements and cardiac computed tomography was used to evaluate coronary calcium score (CS). Patients were followed for 5 years for the ascertainment of their all-cause mortality.
Results
Serum OPN, OC and OPG concentrations increased significantly along with the progression of renal disease. We found a significant positive correlation among these proteins. Additionally, OPN and OPG were significantly and positively correlated to CS. Serum OPG revealed the strongest correlation to the calcium turnover markers of GFR decline and was significantly associated with an increased risk of death in subjects with CKD3-4 or ESRD (HR 5.8, CI 95%).
Conclusion
Single measurement of osteoprotegerin is associated with 5-year all-cause mortality in patients with CKD3-4 or ESRD. We suggest assessing its concentration, preferably in combination with calcium score, to stratify mortality risks in CKD patients.
Keywords: calcium score, chronic kidney disease, osteocalcin, osteopontin, osteoprotegerin
Introduction
Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is associated with a high incidence of cardiovascular disease (CVD) and related mortality.1 Another common complication of CKD that may also affect CVD is mineral and bone disorder (CKD-MBD).2 CKD-MBD is manifested by one or a combination of: 1) abnormalities of calcium, phosphorus, parathyroid hormone, vitamin D and some bone-related cytokine metabolism, 2) abnormalities in bone turnover, and 3) vascular or other soft-tissue calcification. Decline in glomerular filtration in CKD patients causes vitamin D deficiency, derangements in calcium and phosphate homeostasis, and secondary hyperparathyroidism resulting in bone destruction and vascular calcification.3 The latter is associated with cardiovascular morbidity and mortality.4 It was recently reported that medial arterial calcification in CKD patients is increased and correlates with circulating CVD markers.5 Furthermore, calcification score emerged as a significant predictor of long-term survival in CKD patients.6 CKD-MBD is a complex disease that is not completely understood. However, some factors secreted by the osteocytes might play an important role in its pathophysiology. These factors are linked to cardiovascular complications of CKD and are expected to have diagnostic predictive value in patients with CKD.7
Bone-related factors such as: osteopontin (OPN), osteocalcin (OC), osteoprotegerin (OPG) and fibroblast growth factor 23 (FGF23) are linked to CVD development in CKD patients.5,8–18 Plasma OPN levels are independently associated with the presence and severity of diabetic nephropathy9 and were found to be expressed by inflammatory cells such as macrophages and highly induced during inflammatory activation.10,11 In combination with OPG, they increase the predictability of cardiovascular outcomes.12 Serum OC concentrations are significantly lower in non-dialysis CKD patients than in healthy individuals, and correlate with subclinical atherosclerosis in CKD patients.13 OPG indirectly, exerts a suppressive effect on osteoclastogenesis and regulates inflammatory and immune responses.14 It was found to be associated with increased risk of death in CKD patients and was proposed a marker of atherosclerosis and ischemic stroke.15–18 FGF23 is physiologically involved in renal phosphorus excretion and is associated with increased mortality, left ventricular hypertrophy, endothelial dysfunction and progression of CKD.19,20 The diversity in study designs and patient populations precludes definite conclusions as to the diagnostic value of these bone-related factors in CKD population.
The aim of this study was to assess the relationship of OPN, OC, OPG and FGF23 to clinical characteristics and to evaluate whether these biomarkers could predict mortality in patients with different CKD stages at baseline.
Materials and Methods
Patients and Study Design
The following study groups were enrolled: subjects with end-stage renal disease (ESRD, n = 38), CKD stages 3 and 4 (CKD3-4, n = 19) and non-CKD controls (n = 19). Patients were enrolled randomly from the group of patients followed-up in our single center. The inclusion criteria were ESRD or CKD 3 and 4, age >18 years, willingness to participate in the study and ability to sign the informed consent. The exclusion criteria included active infections, malignancies, acute cardiologic conditions such as myocardial infarction or atrial fibrillation and pregnancy. The study groups were unintentionally comparable with respect to sex and age. The clinical and biochemical markers of renal function differed significantly between the groups by study design. Clinical characteristics are summarized in Table 1. Fasting blood was drawn once to perform the measurements, and cardiac computed tomography (CT) was used to evaluate the coronary calcium score (CS). The CT safety was discussed with the patients and appropriate information was provided when informed consent was obtained. Patients were followed prospectively for 5 years to ascertain their all-cause mortality. None of the study patients had to be referred to further invasive diagnostics of coronary artery disease based on the CS results. Fatal events were recorded based on patients’ hospital and out-patient medical records. During this 5-year period 16 patients died: 13 from the ESRD group and 3 from the CKD group. Cardiovascular causes of death were recorded in 11 ESRD and in 2 CKD3-4 patients. Mortality data were collected blind to the laboratory and CT results. The study received approval from the Ethical Committee at the Warsaw Regional Medical Chamber (Resolution No 08/10) and all individuals gave informed consent prior to enrollment. This study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and was a continuation of previous investigation aimed at determination of other biomarkers.21
Table 1.
Clinical Data at Baseline (Modified From21)
Clinical Characteristics | Control Group n = 19 | CKD3-4 Group n = 19 | ESRD Group n = 38 | P value |
---|---|---|---|---|
Age (years) | 62 ± 9 | 65 ± 15 | 60 ± 16 | 0.45 |
Male n (%) | 10 (53) | 9 (47) | 21 (55) | 0.87 |
Prevalent | ||||
Diabetes n (%) | 2 (11) | 7 (37) | 12 (32) | 0.14 |
Hypertension n (%) | 5 (26) | 16 (84) | 22 (59) | < 0.001* |
CVD n (%) | 2 (11) | 7 (37) | 13 (34) | 0.12 |
Biochemical tests [mean (SD)] | ||||
eGFR (mL/min/1.73m2) | 91.28 (17.34) | 28.59 (11.18) | 6.70 (1.94) | by design |
CRP (mg/l) | 1.66 (1.23) | 7.51 (11.68) | 12.48 (31.84) | < 0.001* |
hs-CRP (mg/l) | 1.73 (1.19) | 2.89 (3.13) | - | 0.15 |
PCT (ng/mL) | - | 0.12 (0.11) | 1.13 (2.84) | < 0.001* |
pH | - | 7.33 (0.11) | 7.37 (0.02) | 0.007* |
Total protein (g/dl) | - | 7.45 (0.58) | 6.84 (0.63) | < 0.001* |
Albumin (g/dl) | - | 4.09 (0.33) | 3.99 (0.78) | 0.61 |
Ionized calcium (mEq/l) | - | 1.23 (0.05) | 1.09 (0.10) | < 0.001* |
Total calcium (mEq/l) | - | 4.61 (0.30) | 4.28 (0.58) | 0.02* |
Phosphorus (mEq/l) | - | 2.17 (0.43) | 3.80 (1.06) | < 0.001* |
PTH (pg/mL) | - | 190.53 (209.09) | 539.05 (461.46) | 0.003* |
Vitamin D (ng/mL) | 27.25 (8.05) | 26.84 (7.14) | - | 0.88 |
Alkaline phosphatase (U/l) | - | 129.63 (113.24) | 96.26 (33.75) | 0.10 |
Notes: Conversion factors to SI units are as follows: for CRP and hs-CRP (µg/l) – 1000; for total protein and albumin (g/l) – 10; for 25-hydroxyvitamin D (nmol/l) – 2.496; for PTH (pmol/l) – 0.105; for phosphorus (mmol/l) – 0.0323; for total and ionized calcium (mmol/l) – 0.5. *Indicates statistical significant p < 0.05.
Abbreviations: CKD, chronic kidney disease; CRP, C-reactive protein; CVD, cardiovascular disease; ESRD, end stage renal disease; eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate; hs-CRP, high sensitivity C-reactive protein; PCT, procalcitonin; PTH, parathyroid hormone.
Methods
In the ESRD group, who were dialyzed 3 times per week, blood was taken before mid-week hemodialysis. Blood samples were centrifuged 10 minutes, at 1800g at +4°C and stored in small aliquots at −70°C until analysis (Sarstedt tubes, Numbrecht, Germany). The classical inflammatory markers: C-reactive protein (CRP) or high-sensitivity CRP (hsCRP) (if CRP was lower than 5 mg/l) and procalcitonin, as well as indices of calcium turnover: total and ionized calcium, phosphorus, vitamin D and parathyroid hormone (PTH) were evaluated. MDRD equation was used to estimate glomerular filtration rate (eGFR).22,23
Bone-Related Factors
All bone-related biomarkers were determined with the use of quantitative antibody-based immunoassays in serum samples subjected to one freeze-thaw cycle. OPN, OC and OPG were measured with Milliplex Human Bone Metabolism Panel (HBN1A-51K, Millipore Sigma (formerly Millipore), Billerica, MA, USA) on the Luminex platform, following vendor’s protocols. This multiplex particle-enhanced platform incorporates laser-based detection system based on flow cytometry fluidics. FGF23 was assayed with ELISA (EZHFGF23-32K, Millipore Sigma (formerly Millipore), Billerica, MA, USA). Inter-assay coefficient of variation was lower than 18% in each assay. Samples were balanced by caseness. The optical density (ELISA) or fluorescence intensity (Luminex) was matched with the use of 5-parametric logistic standard curve.24 Forty-three percent of the FGF23 measurements were not detectable, which was more frequent in subjects with better preserved renal function. Assay sensitivity for FGF-23 was 9.9 pg/mL. Inter-assay coefficient of variations for these biomarkers was < 12%.
Biochemical Tests
Basic biochemistry measurements were performed with automatic biochemical analyzers: Cobas Integra 400 plus (Roche Diagnostics, Mannheim, Germany) and Elecsys 2010 Roche. Hs-CRP amount was determined with Roche Diagnostics test; the protein electrophoresis – with Beckman, Appraise Paragon; and blood differential test – with Sysmex SF3000 and Sysmex K4500.
Coronary Calcium Score
A 64-row CT scanner (Aquilion 64, Toshiba Medical Systems, Japan) was used to measure CS. The following protocol parameters of this non-contrast enhanced, electrocardiography-gated CT scan were applied: scan number of 40–52, slice thickness of 3 mm, tube voltage of 120 kV, and tube current of 300 mA. Time of rotation was adjusted to the heart rate. The analysis was performed quantitatively according to the Agatston algorithm using Vitrea 2 workstation V3.9 (Vital Images Inc., USA).25 Lesions were detected based on density of at least 130 HU. Then, they were colour-marked by the software. Experienced radiologist evaluated coronary calcifications. Lesions were scored 1 to 4 depending on their density. CS was determined as a sum of products of each lesion area and its density index.25 The mean CT radiation dose ranged from 0.7 to 1.4 mSv which qualifies the study as a low-dose technique. The safety of the examination was discussed with the patients.
Statistical Analysis
Descriptive characteristics were presented as a mean (standard deviation), a median (25th, 75th percentile) or proportions. Skewness and kurtosis metrics of departures from normality were checked and data were transformed to their base 10 logarithms. Cross-sectional biomarker comparisons were done with variance analysis for unbalanced design, where biomarker was considered dependent variable. Correlations were evaluated with Spearman correlation coefficients in the analyses adjusted for multiple comparisons (Bonferroni corrected alpha = 0.0029).26 Cox proportional-hazards models tested biomarkers associations with the prospective outcome expressed as hazard ratios per one tertile change of the monotonic marker distribution (one degree of freedom). Ties in the failure time were expressed by the exact conditional probabilities. Non-detectable FGF23 values in the follow-up study group accounted for less than one-third of the biomarker values allowing us to evaluate the effect of FGF23 per tertile treated as a categorical variable. Relevant clinical covariates were considered in building the final model. Principal component analysis is an attractive data reduction approach for highly correlated data and was used here to examine the correlated circulating biomarker data in the context of the baseline CKD status.27 The analysis was conducted with an alpha level set to α = 0.05 with the use of softwares: SAS v. 9.4, Cary, NC and JMP Pro14.
Results
Total and ionized calcium were significantly lower, in contrast to phosphorus and PTH, which were significantly higher in ESRD than in CKD3-4 patients (Table 1). Serum concentrations of OPN, OC and OPG increased significantly along with the CKD progression (Table 2). All studied factors were significantly higher in ESRD than in CKD3-4 patients, while OPN and OC were also significantly higher in CKD3-4 group than in controls. Moreover, all bone-related factor concentrations had a significant positive correlation among each other and had an inverse correlation to eGFR (Table 3).
Table 2.
Circulating Bone-Related and Imaging Markers at Baseline in the Controls, CKD3-4 and ESRD Groups, Respectively. Biomarker Concentrations are Presented as Median (25th, 75th Percentile) Values. Proportion of Detectable FGF23 Values Was 5% in Controls, 26% in the CKD3-4 and 92% in the ESRD Patients
Control Group n=19 | CKD3-4 Group n=19 | ESRD Group n=38 | P value CKD3-4 vs Control | P value CKD3-4 vs ESRD | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Bone-related markers | |||||
Osteopontin (ng/mL) | 11 (6, 15) | 27 (22, 37) | 38 (27, 49) | < 0.001 | < 0.001 |
Osteocalcin (ng/mL) | 8.0 (5.8, 10.5) | 20 (15, 30) | 102 (39, 188) | 0.04 | < 0.001 |
Osteoprotegerin (pg/mL) | 451 (383, 607) | 729 (477, 855) | 1146 (894, 1613) | 0.10 | < 0.001 |
FGF23 (pg/mL) | - | - (-, 13) | 2044 (707, 5213) | 0.05 | < 0.001 |
Imaging markers | |||||
Coronary calcium score | NM | 338 (67, 563) | 375 (38, 1144) | NA | 0.74 |
Abbreviations: CKD, chronic kidney disease; ESRD, end stage renal disease; FGF, fibroblast growth factor; NM, not measured; NA, non applicable.
Table 3.
Spearman Correlation Matrix for the Studied Biomarkers and Clinical Characteristics
Osteopontin | Osteocalcin | Osteoprotegerin | FGF23 | Calcium Score | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Bone-related markers | |||||
Osteopontin | 1 | 0.57** | 0.56** | 0.49** | 0.32* |
Osteocalcin | 0.57** | 1 | 0.55** | 0.74** | −0.16 |
Osteoprotegerin | 0.57** | 0.55** | 1 | 0.59** | 0.57** |
FGF23 | 0.49** | 0.74** | 0.59** | 1 | 0.20 |
Imaging marker | |||||
Calcium score | 0.32* | −0.16 | 0.57** | 0.20 | 1 |
Clinical characteristics | |||||
age | 0.14821 | −0.15 | 0.42** | −0.14 | 0.62** |
eGFR | −0.61** | −0.78** | −0.68** | −0.81** | −0.02 |
CRP | 0,21 | 0.17882 | 0.33* | 0.20 | 0.19 |
Procalcitonin | 0,20 | 0.54** | 0.36* | 0.65** | 0.03 |
pH | 0,07 | 0.34* | 0.33* | 0.55** | 0.02 |
Total protein | −0.10 | −0.27* | −0.38* | −0.35* | −0.05 |
Albumin | 0.01 | 0.22 | −0.31* | 0.18 | −0.21 |
Ionized calcium | −0.14 | −0.43* | −0.50** | −0.49** | −0.19 |
Total calcium | −0.26* | −0.26 | −0.46** | −0.16 | −0.31* |
Phosphorus | 0.20 | 0.66** | 0.37* | 0.75** | 0.04 |
Parathyroid hormone | 0.20 | 0.76** | 0.26* | 0.69** | −0.03 |
Vitamin D | −0.14 | −0.16 | −0.11 | −0.18 | 0.25 |
Notes: Correlation coefficients are presented (*Indicates coefficients significant at alpha = 0.05 and **Indicates coefficients significant at Bonferroni corrected alpha =0.0029).
Abbreviations: CRP, C-reactive protein; eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate; FGF, fibroblast growth factor.
The principal component analysis based on the circulating biomarkers revealed decent level of discrimination between the groups and explained more than a half of the variance (Figure 1). The first principal component featured an eigenvalue of 2.758, whereas the following components had an eigenvalue below 1.0. Loadings of the first component were quite evenly distributed among 4 biomarkers (Supplemental Table 1).
Figure 1.
Score plot of principal components 1 and 2 based on the four circulating bone-related biomarkers different between study groups. Each mark represents a study subject. Subjects with ESRD are marked as red circles, those with CKD3-4 are marked as orange circles and the control group is marked with green circles. Description of the x and y axes includes the number of the principal component and the explained variance.
Additionally, OPN and OPG showed a significant positive correlation to CS. OPN was also found to inversely correlate with total calcium. OC and FGF23 similarly significantly correlated positively to PTH and phosphorus and negatively to ionized calcium. Serum OPG revealed the strongest correlation to the clinical consequences of GFR decline. It correlated significantly with all studied calcium turnover markers, with inflammation markers and with pH, albuminemia and proteinemia (Table 3).
Among studied bone-related markers, OPG was the only to increase significantly the risk of death in subjects with CKD3-4 or ESRD. The effect of OPG per one tertile change in the crude analysis was HR (95% CI): 5.8 (2.2, 16.0) (Table 4). It remained significant after adjustment for age, sex, baseline CKD status: HR (95% CI): 5.1 (1.1, 23.3) and further, after adjustment for either CRP, total protein or phosphorus levels. An adjustment for ionized calcium resulted in borderline significance (p=0.058). The effect of OPG in the model adjusted for age, sex, baseline CKD status and coronary calcium score was HR (95% CI): 4.1 (0.8, 20.9); p=0.093. There was no interaction between OPG and the CKD status (p=0.57).
Table 4.
Cox Proportional Hazard Models for Incident All-Cause Mortality in CKD3-4 or ESRD Patients at Baseline. Crude Models are Presented. Effects of All Biomarkers are Presented per One Tertile Change of a Monotonic Biomarker Distribution, Except for FGF23, Where the Effects are Presented per One Tertile as a Categorical Variable, Respectively
Marker | Cox Analysis (CKD3-4 + ESRD) | Cox Analysis (ESRD Only) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HR | 95% CI | P value | HR | 95% CI | P value | |
Osteopontin | 1.74 | 0.95–3.18 | 0.075 | 1.42 | 0.74–2.7 | 0.29 |
Osteocalcin | 0.64 | 0.34–1.22 | 0.17 | 0.61 | 0.32–1.19 | 0.15 |
Osteoprotegerin | 5.81 | 2.17–15.56 | < 0.001 | 4.87 | 1.74–13.56 | 0.003 |
FGF23 T1 (ref) | 1.00 | 1.00 | ||||
T2 vs T1 | 1.99 | 0.30–13.28 | 0.48 | 1.38 | 0.31–6.15 | 0.68 |
T3 vs T1 | 1.71 | 0.21–13.37 | 0.61 | 1.64 | 0.37–7.33 | 0.52 |
Coronary calcium score | 4.65 | 2.14 −10.1 | 0.0001 | 4.09 | 1.88–8.9 | 0.0004 |
Note: Bold formatting indicates statistical significance (p<0.05).
Abbreviations: CKD, chronic kidney disease; ESRD, end stage renal disease; FGF, fibroblast growth factor; HR, hazard ratio; T, tertile.
Discussion
We found that osteoprotegerin correlated with lower eGFR, calcium score and other bone-related factors, and was associated with increased 5-year all-cause mortality risk in CKD3-4 or ESRD patients. These observations are in line with the previous reports showing OPG to be elevated in non-diabetic28,29 and diabetic30–32 CKD patients, and to predict renal function decline, cardiovascular events and all-cause mortality.31 OPG has been found to be elevated in association with increased 5- and 10-year kidney function deterioration risk, CKD-related hospitalization, and/or deaths in elderly women.33 A meta-analysis of 10 studies comprising 2120 CKD patients (including 1723 with ESRD) revealed an association of elevated OPG concentrations with an increased risk of cardiovascular death.34 Recently, it was also reported that circulating OPG was significantly associated with CKD diagnosis in hypertensive non-diabetic patients, independently from other variables.35 Accordingly, elevated serum OPG levels were associated with higher all-cause and cardiovascular 5-year mortality risk, independent of age, CVD, diabetes, and inflammatory markers, in patients with CKD stages 3–5.36 Most of these studies were performed in diabetic patients, and suggest OPG to be a biomarker of CKD progression.37,38 Our findings were confirmed on mixed population of diabetic and non-diabetic subjects at different CKD stages, therefore bring novel arguments as to the use of OPG as a mortality predicting marker in CKD patients.
Of note, we found patient age to be positively correlated with OPG, but not with other bone-related markers. This is an important finding in the context of a cross-sectional study by Vik et al, who found that OPG variably correlates to eGFR depending on age and renal function. A reverse correlation was found in individuals older than the median age with reduced renal function, whereas a positive association could be observed in younger subjects with normal eGFR.39 The mean overall age in this study was 61 years and was comparable to our study groups. This indicated that younger subjects with elevated OPG who develop CKD might have a worse prognosis, particularly because it was also positively correlated with the calcium score.
Analogically to OPG, we found OPN a significant positive correlation with declining eGFR, other bone-related factors and CS. It is known that OPN is produced by the vasculature and bone, is engaged in atherosclerotic plaque formation, and causes renal damage in animal models.40,41 In humans, OPN levels may indicate atherosclerosis by means of plaque growth and its rupture susceptibility. Moreover, statins treatment and bypass surgery could reduce OPN concentration.42 Therefore, it is not surprising that OPN is linked to the mortality prediction in CKD patients.43 Of note, these associations disappeared after adjustment for markers of inflammation. For this reason, combinations of OPN with other biomarkers are sought. Our findings of positive correlations of OPN with OPG and CS are consistent with the results of the NEFRONA Study subanalysis, where the atherosclerotic plaques were assessed in 1043 patients with renal failure in relation to OPG, OPN and sTWEAK concentrations. It was found that elevated OPG or OPN along with the inferior sTWEAK levels significantly correlated to a higher risk of cardiovascular events. Moreover, it was reported that combination of the mentioned biomarkers improved cardiovascular event prognostication in patients with CKD.12
Interestingly, FGF23 was below the level of detection in controls and in the CKD3-4 group. Relation of serum markers to bone expression of specific proteins could partially explain this. In a recent study of patients with different CKD stages and controls, several bone remodeling markers were determined in serum and bone biopsy. This study revealed that sclerostin and PTHR1 were elevated in the earlier CKD stages, whereas FGF23 and phosphorylated b-catenin expression were higher in the advanced CKD. Moreover, significant correlations between serum and bone FGF-23 were established.44 One of the study limitations was that our hypothesis-driven approach only focused on four biologically related biomarkers. Future untargeted studies of circulating biomarkers using emerging proteomics technologies will allow us to elucidate these biomarker relationships in greater detail.45 Another limitation of our study is the small sample size and patient heterogeneity, which make this study prone to several types of biases. Despite the fact that we have employed a number of careful biostatistical strategies, an analysis adjusted for confounding factors is limited.
Conclusion
Serum osteoprotegerin is associated with an incident 5-year all-cause mortality in patients with CKD3-4 or ESRD. We suggest assessing its concentration, preferably in combination with calcium score, to stratify mortality risks in CKD patients.
Disclosure
Dr Joanna Kamińska report personal fees from Roche Poland, outside the submitted work; Dr Bartosz Foroncewicz report congress fee + travel from Astellas and Chiesi, outside the submitted work; Dr Krzysztof Mucha report congress fee + travel from Astellas, outside the submitted work; In addition, Dr Bartosz Foroncewicz, Dr Krzysztof Mucha and Dr Leszek Pączek have patents WO2018141975A1 and WO2017212463 pending. The authors report no other conflicts of interest in this work.
References
- 1.Foley RN, Parfrey PS, Sarnak MJ. Epidemiology of cardiovascular disease in chronic renal disease. J Am Soc Nephrol. 1998;9(12 Suppl):S16–S23. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Moschella C. Chronic kidney disease-mineral and bone disorder: guidelines for diagnosis, treatment, and management. JAAPA. 2016;29(7):21–29. doi: 10.1097/01.JAA.0000484297.49157.9b [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Yuen NK, Ananthakrishnan S, Campbell MJ. Hyperparathyroidism of renal disease. Perm J. 2016;20:78–83. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Noce A, Canale MP, Capria A, et al. Coronary artery calcifications predict long term cardiovascular events in nondiabetic Caucasian hemodialysis patients. Aging (Albany NY). 2015;7(4):269–279. doi: 10.18632/aging.100740 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Krzanowski M, Krzanowska K, Gajda M, et al. Asymmetric dimethylarginine as a useful risk marker of radial artery calcification in patients with advanced kidney disease. Pol Arch Intern Med. 2018;128(3):157–165. doi: 10.20452/pamw.4201 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Dimkovic N, Schlieper G, Jankovic A, et al. Prognostic value of cardiovascular calcifications in hemodialysis patients: a longitudinal study. Int Urol Nephrol. 2018;50(5):939–946. doi: 10.1007/s11255-018-1821-1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Krzanowski M, Krzanowska K, Gajda M, et al. Pentraxin 3 as a new indicator of cardiovascular-related death in patients with advanced chronic kidney disease. Pol Arch Intern Med. 2017;127(3):170–177. doi: 10.20452/pamw.3944 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Kamińska J, Stopiński M, Krata N, et al. Cardiovascular biomarkers in chronic kidney disease. Forum Nefrol. 2017;10:1–9. [Google Scholar]
- 9.Yan X, Sano M, Lu L, et al. Plasma concentrations of osteopontin, but not thrombin-cleaved osteopontin, are associated with the presence and severity of nephropathy and coronary artery disease in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2010;9(1):70. doi: 10.1186/1475-2840-9-70 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Lund SA, Wilson CL, Raines EW, et al. Osteopontin mediates macrophage chemotaxis via α4 and α9 integrins and survival via the α4 integrin. J Cell Biochem. 2013;114(5):1194–1202. doi: 10.1002/jcb.24462 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Kahles F, Findeisen HM, Bruemmer D, et al. Osteopontin: a novel regulator at the cross roads of inflammation, obesity and diabetes. Mol Metab. 2014;3(4):384–393. doi: 10.1016/j.molmet.2014.03.004 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Bozic M, Méndez-Barbero N, Gutiérrez-Muñoz C, et al. Combination of biomarkers of vascular calcification and sTWEAK to predict cardiovascular events in chronic kidney disease. Atherosclerosis. 2018;270:13–20. doi: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2018.01.011 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Zhang M, Ni Z, Zhou W, et al. Undercarboxylated osteocalcin as a biomarker of subclinical atherosclerosis in non-dialysis patients with chronic kidney disease. J Biomed Sci. 2015;22(1):75. doi: 10.1186/s12929-015-0183-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Maruyama K, Takada Y, Ray N, et al. Receptor activator of NF-kappa B ligand and osteoprotegerin regulate proinflammatory cytokine production in mice. J Immunol. 2006;177(6):3799–3805. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.177.6.3799 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Yilmaz MI, Siriopol D, Saglam M, et al. Osteoprotegerin in chronic kidney disease: associations with vascular damage and cardiovascular events. Calcif Tissue Int. 2016;99(2):121–130. doi: 10.1007/s00223-016-0136-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Alkaç C, Alkaç B, Akbaş F, et al. Osteoprotegerin as a marker of atherosclerosis in type 1 and type 2 diabetic patients. Turk J Med Sci. 2015;45:1306–1311. doi: 10.3906/sag-1408-37 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Kim CS, Bae EH, Ma SK, et al. Association of serum osteoprotegerin levels with bone loss in chronic kidney disease: insights from the KNOW-CKD study. PLoS One. 2016;11(11):e0166792. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0166792 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Üstündağ M, Orak M, Güloğlu C, et al. The role of serum osteoprotegerin and S-100 protein levels in patients with acute ischaemic stroke: determination of stroke subtype, severity and mortality. J Int Med Res. 2011;39(3):780–789. doi: 10.1177/147323001103900310 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Lederer E. Regulation of serum phosphate. J Physiol. 2014;592(18):3985–3995. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2014.273979 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Wal P, Wolf M. FGF23 in chronic kidney disease. In: Kuro M, editor. Endocrine FGFs and Klothos. NY: Springer; 2012:107–125. [Google Scholar]
- 21.Kamińska J, Stopiński M, Mucha K, et al. IL 6 but not TNF is linked to coronary artery calcification in patients with chronic kidney disease. Cytokine. 2019;120:9–14. doi: 10.1016/j.cyto.2019.04.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Tarantini L, Barbati G, Cioffi G, et al. Clinical implications of the CKD epidemiology collaboration (CKD-EPI) equation compared with the modification of diet in renal disease (MDRD) study equation for the estimation of renal dysfunction in patients with cardiovascular disease. Intern Emerg Med. 2015;10(8):955–963. doi: 10.1007/s11739-015-1260-2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.van Rijn MHC, Metzger M, Flamant M, et al. Performance of creatinine-based equations for estimating glomerular filtration rate changes over time. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2020;35(5):819–827. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfy278 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Gottschalk PG, Dunn JR. The five-parameter logistic: a characterization and comparison with the four-parameter logistic. Anal Biochem. 2005;343(1):54–65. doi: 10.1016/j.ab.2005.04.035 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Agatston AS, Janowitz WR, Hildner FJ, et al. Quantification of coronary artery calcium using ultrafast computed tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1990;15(4):827–832. doi: 10.1016/0735-1097(90)90282-T [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Agresti A. The effect of category choice on some ordinal measures of association. J Am Statistical Assoc. 1976;71(353):49–51. doi: 10.1080/01621459.1976.10481475 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Carey RN, Wold S, Westgard JO. Principal component analysis: an alternative to “referee” methods in method comparison studies. Anal Chem. 1975;47(11):1824–1829. doi: 10.1021/ac60361a037 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Kazama JJ, Shigematsu T, Yano K, et al. Increased circulating levels of osteoclastogenesis inhibitory factor (osteoprotegerin) in patients with chronic renal failure. Am J Kidney Dis. 2002;39(3):525–532. doi: 10.1053/ajkd.2002.31402 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Upadhyay A, Larson MG, Guo CY, et al. Inflammation, kidney function and albuminuria in the Framingham offspring cohort. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2011;26(3):920–922. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfq471 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Rasmussen LM, Tarnow L, Hansen TK, et al. Plasma osteoprotegerin levels are associated with glycaemic status, systolic blood pressure, kidney function and cardiovascular morbidity in type 1 diabetic patients. Eur J Endocrinol. 2006;154(1):75–81. doi: 10.1530/eje.1.02049 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Jorsal A, Tarnow L, Flyvbjerg A, et al. Plasma osteoprotegerin levels predict cardiovascular and all-cause mortality and deterioration of kidney function in type 1 diabetic patients with nephropathy. Diabetologia. 2008;51(11):2100–2107. doi: 10.1007/s00125-008-1123-8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Gordin D, Soro-Paavonen A, Thomas MC, et al. Osteoprotegerin is an independent predictor of vascular events in Finnish adults with type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2013;36(7):1827–1833. doi: 10.2337/dc12-2170 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Lewis JR, Lim WH, Zhu K, et al. Elevated osteoprotegerin predicts declining renal function in elderly women: a 10-year prospective cohort study. Am J Nephrol. 2014;39(1):66–74. doi: 10.1159/000357787 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Huang QX, Li JB, Huang N, Huang XW, Li YL, Huang FX. Elevated osteoprotegerin concentration predicts increased risk of cardiovascular mortality in patients with chronic kidney disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Kidney Blood Press Res. 2020;45(4):565–575. doi: 10.1159/000508978 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Bernardi S, Toffoli B, Bossi F, et al. Circulating osteoprotegerin is associated with chronic kidney disease in hypertensive patients. BMC Nephrol. 2017;18(1):219–227. doi: 10.1186/s12882-017-0625-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Marques GL, Hayashi S, Bjällmark A, et al. Osteoprotegerin is a marker of cardiovascular mortality in patients with chronic kidney disease stages 3–5. Sci Rep. 2021;11(1):2473. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-82072-z [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Montanez-Barragan A, Gomez-Barrera I, Sanchez-Nino MD, et al. Osteoprotegerin and kidney disease. J Nephrol. 2014;27(6):607–617. doi: 10.1007/s40620-014-0092-x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Candido R. The osteoprotegerin/tumor necrosis factor related apoptosis-inducing ligand axis in the kidney. Curr Opin Nephrol Hypertens. 2014;23(1):69–74. doi: 10.1097/01.mnh.0000437611.42417.7a [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Vik A, Brodin EE, Mathiesen EB, et al. Serum osteoprotegerin and renal function in the general population: the Tromsø Study. Clin Kidney J. 2017;10(1):38–44. doi: 10.1093/ckj/sfw095 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Matsui Y, Rittling SR, Okamoto H, et al. Osteopontin deficiency attenuates atherosclerosis in female apolipoprotein E-deficient mice. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2003;23(6):1029–1034. doi: 10.1161/01.ATV.0000074878.29805.D0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Pei Z, Okura T, Nagao T, et al. Osteopontin deficiency reduces kidney damage from hypercholesterolemia in Apolipoprotein E-deficient mice. Sci Rep. 2016;6(1):28882. doi: 10.1038/srep28882 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Wolak T. Osteopontin - a multi-modal marker and mediator in atherosclerotic vascular disease. Atherosclerosis. 2014;236(2):327–337. doi: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2014.07.004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Barreto DV, Lenglet A, Liabeuf S, et al. Prognostic implication of plasma osteopontin levels in patients with chronic kidney disease. Nephron Clin Pract. 2011;117(4):c363–c372. doi: 10.1159/000321520 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Graciolli FG, Neves KR, Barreto F, et al. The complexity of chronic kidney disease–mineral and bone disorder across stages of chronic kidney disease. Kidney Int. 2017;91(6):1436–1446. doi: 10.1016/j.kint.2016.12.029 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Niewczas MA, Pavkov ME, Skupien J, et al. A signature of circulating inflammatory proteins and development of end-stage renal disease in diabetes. Nat Med. 2019;25(5):805–813. doi: 10.1038/s41591-019-0415-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]