Skip to main content
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences logoLink to Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
. 2021 Jun 14;376(1830):20200210. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2020.0210

Introduction to the theme issue: Measuring physiology in free-living animals

L A Hawkes 1,, A Fahlman 2,3, K Sato 4
PMCID: PMC8200652  PMID: 34121463

Abstract

By describing where animals go, biologging technologies (i.e. animal attached logging of biological variables with small electronic devices) have been used to document the remarkable athletic feats of wild animals since the 1940s. The rapid development and miniaturization of physiologging (i.e. logging of physiological variables such as heart rate, blood oxygen content, lactate, breathing frequency and tidal volume on devices attached to animals) technologies in recent times (e.g. devices that weigh less than 2 g mass that can measure electrical biopotentials for days to weeks) has provided astonishing insights into the physiology of free-living animals to document how and why wild animals undertake these extreme feats. Now, physiologging, which was traditionally hindered by technological limitations, device size, ethics and logistics, is poised to benefit enormously from the on-going developments in biomedical and sports wearables technologies. Such technologies are already improving animal welfare and yield in agriculture and aquaculture, but may also reveal future pathways for therapeutic interventions in human health by shedding light on the physiological mechanisms with which free-living animals undertake some of the most extreme and impressive performances on earth.

This article is part of the theme issue ‘Measuring physiology in free-living animals (Part I)’.

Keywords: biologging, nanosensor, electronic engineering, medicine, diving, flight

1. Introduction

The field of ‘biologging’ (i.e. animal attached logging of biological variables with small electronic devices) has revealed how species of wild animals undertake remarkable feats of athleticism that set the benchmark for vertebrate performance. In the aerial environment, this includes non-stop endurance migratory flights of over 11 000 km by bar-tailed godwits (Limosa lapponica [1]), extreme long-distance migrations of more than 100 000 km by Arctic terns (Sterna paradisaea [2]), high-altitude flights of over 6000 m altitude by bar-headed geese (Anser indicus [36]) and non-stop flights for more than 10 months of the year by common swifts (Apus apus [7]). Similar remarkable feats have been recorded in the aquatic realm, including dives beyond 500 m deep by emperor penguins (Aptenodytes forsteri [8]), dives beyond 2 km deep by elephant seals (Mirounga sp.) resulting in near total venous blood oxygen depletion [911] and dives to nearly 3 km deep [12] for over 3 h [13] by Cuvier's beaked whales (Ziphius cavirostris). These astonishing feats highlight the fact that not only is it important to conserve wildlife for aesthetic and ethical reasons [14], but also because these athletic species may help to highlight medical pathways and approaches for some of the greatest health challenges for humans, including hypoxia (e.g. strokes and heart attacks), diabetes and obesity. The inspiration for this theme issue came from animal biologists attending conferences of Extreme and Expedition Medics, where researchers were engaged in medical studies in similar ecosystems (e.g. high altitude, [15,16]). While a few recent studies have made use of medical technologies designed for humans to study the diving capacity of humans and seals [17,18], medical studies generally have access to, and use, a wider and more sophisticated range of technology than what is available in the animal tracking sphere. Thus, this may be a critical time to bring together animal biology and medical technology, so that future research can draw inspiration across disciplines.

While biologging has largely focused on describing where animals go, the field of ‘physiologging’ (i.e. animal attached logging of physiological variables such as heart rate, blood oxygen content, lactate, breathing frequency and tidal volume) can provide crucial insights into how and why animals make the journeys they do. Many of the most important research questions in ecology (e.g. how does the environment drive movement? what sensory information do animals use to navigate? how will wildlife cope with anthropogenic-driven climate change?) critically need these how and why questions to be answered. However, physiologging technologies have evolved much more slowly than biologging technologies, with cutting edge developments generally coming from individual laboratory groups or research projects. From the 1960s onwards, a revolution in microelectronics, sports wearable technologies, nano-sensor devices and portable medical diagnostics for humans has provided a fertile opportunity for a step change in the study of physiology in free-living animals, which does not seem to have been exploited. For example, in 1962, Leyland C. Clark (the inventor of the oxygen electrode) invented the ‘enzyme electrode’, which used electrochemical detection of an immobilized enzyme by a metal electrode to measure the concentrations of various substances [19]. These ‘biosensors' are now extremely small, can cost as little as 2 cents a test, and can be mass produced in millions of units via screen-printing [20,21]. In a total biosensor market worth more than $13 billion, approximately 85% of the market is now focused on the measurement of blood glucose for diabetes [22]. Yet, these technologies appear to have been almost entirely untapped by the animal biologging field. We therefore propose that a ‘second age of biologging’ has arrived, which will operate on the boundaries between the disciplines of animal biology, medicine, sports and engineering, and will enable researchers to answer important questions in eco-physiology. This theme issue was driven by the recognition that animal biology requires a step change in the available technology to answer big research questions, and that the fields of animal biology and sports medical wearables and technology should now be integrated. The theme issue is divided into three sections.

2. Part 1: the past

In the mid-twentieth century, scientists contrived to monitor movements of marine megafauna under natural conditions. For example, Archie Carr used styrofoam floats and helium-filled balloons to track the movement of green turtles in the open sea [23], Per Scholander deployed capillary tubes on a fin whale to measure their maximum dive depth [24], and Arthur DeVries attached a Tsurumi Seiki depth recorder on female Weddell seals to show that these animals could dive down to at least 350 m [25] (figure 1). Following on from the research by Arthur DeVries, Gerald Kooyman then designed and built a time-depth recorder for deployment on Weddell seals to demonstrate that these animals can dive even deeper, as individuals reached depths beyond 600 m and for longer than 40 min [37]. In fact, this particular study may have been the genesis of the field of measuring physiology in free-living animals [38]. In 2003, the first international symposium on such research was held in Tokyo, and a new term ‘Bio-logging’ was proposed by the organizing committee. Biologging has now come to be defined as the ‘investigation of phenomena in or around free-living organisms that are beyond the boundary of our visibility or experience’ [39]. Since then, a biologging symposium has been held every two to three years in several locations around the world. The field of biologging traditionally focused on technologies that allowed researchers to follow the movements of animals via satellite, which resulted in the successful tracking of a diverse range of terrestrial and marine animals [40,41]. However, the field of physiologging did not keep pace, possibly owing to the invasive and logistically demanding nature of physiological research [42] and the size of traditional logging devices that precluded smaller animals from being studied.

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Timeline of (top) electronic and microprocessor development from the 1940s to the present day; and (bottom) key events in the field of physiologging. (Online version in colour.)

3. Part II: the present state-of-the-art

Owing to the recent and rapid development of physiologging technologies, it is currently possible to monitor fine-scale physiological changes in free-living animals not only with custom-made biologging devices [43], but also with state-of-the-art miniaturized commercial technologies developed for use in humans [44] or for farmed terrestrial and aquatic animals (e.g. dairy cattle [45,46] and fishes [47,48]). For example, the portable and commercially available near infraRed spectroscopy data logging devices introduced in 2006 were originally designed for measuring muscle oximetry in sports athletes [49], but have now also been used to show anticipatory adjustments of blood flow prior to diving in seals [18,50,51]. A wide range of variables can be measured with current physiologging technologies, which includes heart rate [5256], brain activity [57,58], tissue oxygenation [50,51], respiratory rhythms [59,60] and body temperature [61,62]. When measured simultaneously with other parameters (e.g. time, depth, altitude, etc.), these variables can provide substantial insights into how wild animals undertake their remarkable feats of athleticism.

In addition to investigating the eco-physiology of wild animals, studies of animals in managed care provide rich opportunities for developing physiologging technologies, validating sensors, developing automated analytical approaches, and for comprehensively understanding the physiological responses of farmed animals and their longer-term consequences. For example, the global aquaculture industry is valued at several hundred billion dollars and thus optimizing the health and mass gain of fishes and shellfish is of paramount importance. Consequently, tools to monitor aquatic animal movement and physiology have been developed to maximize yield [47,48]. Likewise, automated analysis of physiological and movement data from dairy cows can help to identify and treat lameness before milk production suffers [45]. Furthermore, measurements of physiological parameters in cetaceans that are housed in aquaria and research facilities provide an opportunity to validate algorithms and/or indices for use on free-living animals [59]. Emerging technologies using implanted biosensors with carbon nanotubes [36] or glue-on ‘marine skin’ devices [64] have not yet been able to make measurements of biological phenomena, but have paved the way for future research.

4. Part III: the future

At present, with few exceptions, the application of physiologging in wild animal research is generally restricted to a handful of laboratories that have in-house engineers designing custom-made devices for their studies [36,63,64]. By introducing the field of biologging to medical biotechnology and sports wearables, as well as technology used in managed animals (agriculture and aquaculture), the hope is that the field can be opened up to allow more researchers to ask the sorts of questions that are required to tackle the most important threats to wild animals (e.g. disease transmission, climate change, [65]). Moreover, because devices developed for the medical biotechnology, agricultural and sports industries are underlined by enormous market opportunity, they are generally better tested and thus have a lower failure rate (e.g. from leaking or breaking, to hardware and software failures). This means that animal researchers employing these technologies could get more accurate and reliable data over longer periods of time, which would undoubtedly improve wildlife management, threat mitigation and our understanding of species resilience. This would represent a considerable step forward for wild animal research [65,66]. At the same time, automated analytical and software approaches will increase the power of analyses while also transforming potentially complex physiologging technologies into more user-friendly systems [67]. This may also have the advantage of helping to alleviate some of the problems that can be encountered when processing the long-term and/or high-resolution datasets obtained with physiologging technologies (e.g. the sampling of an electrocardiogram signal at 200 Hz for an entire year would produce 6.3 billion data points) [68]. The development of small and robust devices for measuring the physiology of wild animals also represents an exciting engineering challenge that could be used in the microelectronics realm to drive device development and testing in a broader sense. Finally, lessons learned from how animals cope with extreme environments and undertake (at least what we perceive to be) extreme athletic feats may yield lessons for the treatment of human conditions [69,70]. For example, the study of hypoxia in high-flying birds has been of interest to medics studying ischemia and hypoxaemia in humans [71].

5. Concluding remarks

The study of free-living animals and wildlife continues to provide a rich ground for scientific discovery and technical development (e.g. the ICARUS global tracking initiative [72]). Excitingly, biologging and its sub-discipline physiologging are poised to greatly benefit from the rapid advancements in medical biotechnology and wearable biosensors. With an ever-increasing access to technologies capable of determining real-time physiological changes in free-living animals, a ‘second age of biologging’ has well and truly arrived for eco-physiologists. This age will undoubtedly create new and exciting opportunities for measuring biological phenomena in free-living animals. Such information will not only provide important information about basic function and physiology, but will be critical to predict how major forces such as disease and climate change may impact the performance, health and welfare of both individuals and populations of free-living animals.

Acknowledgements

This manuscript benefitted enormously from the careful, thorough and constructive comments of Jeroen Brijs and two anonymous reviewers. This special issue is dedicated to Professor Patrick Butler, who was one of the pioneers in the study of the physiology of free-living animals, and thus inspired the field on which physiologging has been developed.

Data accessibility

This article has no additional data.

Competing interests

We declare we have no competing interests.

Funding

We received no funding for this study.

References

  • 1.Gill RE, et al. 2009. Extreme endurance flights by landbirds crossing the Pacific Ocean: ecological corridor rather than barrier? Proc. R. Soc. B 276, 447– 457. ( 10.1098/rspb.2008.1142) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Egevang C, Stenhouse IJ, Phillips RA, Petersen A, Fox JW, Silk JRD. 2010. Tracking of Arctic terns Sterna paradisaea reveals longest animal migration. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 107, 2078-2081. ( 10.1073/pnas.0909493107) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Bishop CM, et al. 2015. The roller coaster flight strategy of bar-headed geese conserves energy during Himalayan migrations. Science 347, 250-254. ( 10.1126/science.1258732) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Hawkes LA, et al. 2012. The paradox of extreme high-altitude migration in bar-headed geese Anser indicus. Proc. R. Soc. B 280, 20122114. ( 10.1098/rspb.2012.2114) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Hawkes LA, et al. 2011. The trans-Himalayan flights of bar-headed geese (Anser indicus). Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 108, 9516-9519. ( 10.1073/pnas.1017295108) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Klaassen RHG, Alerstam T, Carlsson P, Fox JW, Lindström Å. 2011. Great flights by great snipes: long and fast non-stop migration over benign habitats. Biol. Lett. 7, 833. ( 10.1098/rsbl.2011.0343) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Hedenström A, Norevik G, Warfvinge K, Andersson A, Bäckman J, Åkesson S. 2016. Annual 10-month aerial life phase in the common swift Apus apus. Curr. Biol. 26, 3066-3070. ( 10.1016/j.cub.2016.09.014) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Wienecke B, Robertson G. 2006. Comparison of foraging strategies of incubating king penguins Aptenodytes patagonicus from Macquarie and Heard islands. Polar Biol. 29, 424-438. ( 10.1007/s00300-005-0074-5) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Meir JU, Champagne CD, Costa DP, Williams CL, Ponganis PJ. 2009. Extreme hypoxemic tolerance and blood oxygen depletion in diving elephant seals. Am. J. Physiol. Reg. Integr. Comp. Physiol. 297, R927-RR39. ( 10.1152/ajpregu.00247.2009) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Hindell MA, Slip DJ, Burton HR, Bryden MM. 1992. Physiological implications of continuous, prolonged, and deep dives of the southern elephant seal (Mirounga leonina). Can. J. Zool. 70, 370-379. ( 10.1139/z92-055) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.McIntyre T, de Bruyn PJN, Ansorge IJ, Bester MN, Bornemann H, Plotz J, Tosh CA. 2010. A lifetime at depth: vertical distribution of southern elephant seals in the water column. Polar Biol. 33, 1037-1048. ( 10.1007/s00300-010-0782-3) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Schorr GS, Falcone EA, Moretti DJ, Andrews RD. 2014. First long-term behavioral records from Cuvier's beaked whales (Ziphius cavirostris) reveal record-breaking dives. PLoS ONE 9, e92633. ( 10.1371/journal.pone.0092633) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Quick NJ, Cioffi WR, Shearer JM, Fahlman A, Read AJ. 2020. Extreme diving in mammals: first estimates of behavioural aerobic dive limits in Cuvier's beaked whales. J. Exp. Biol. 223, jeb222109. ( 10.1242/jeb.222109) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Simaika JP, Samways MJ. 2010. Biophilia as a universal ethic for conserving biodiversity. Conserv. Biol. 24, 903-906. ( 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2010.01485.x) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Berger MM, Grocott MPW. 2017. Facing acute hypoxia: from the mountains to critical care medicine. Br. J. Anaesth. 118, 283-286. ( 10.1093/bja/aew407) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Grocott MPW, Martin DS, Levett DZH, McMorrow R, Windsor J, Montgomery HE. 2009. Arterial blood gases and oxygen content in climbers on Mount Everest. New Engl. J. Med. 360, 140-149. ( 10.1056/NEJMoa0801581) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Ponganis PJ, Stockard TK, Meir JU, Williams CL, Ponganis KV, van Dam RP, Howard R. 2007. Returning on empty: extreme blood O2 depletion underlies dive capacity of emperor penguins. J. Exp. Biol. 210, 4279-4285. ( 10.1242/jeb.011221) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Mcknight JC, et al. 2019. Shining new light on mammalian diving physiology using wearable near-infrared spectroscopy. PLoS Biol. 17, e3000306. ( 10.1371/journal.pbio.3000306) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Updike SJ, Hicks GP. 1967. The enzyme electrode. Nature 214, 986-988. ( 10.1038/214986a0) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Turner APF. 2013. Biosensors: sense and sensibility. Chem. Soc. Rev. 42, 3184. ( 10.1039/c3cs35528d) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Yetisen AK, Akram MS, Lowe CR. 2013. Paper-based microfluidic point-of-care diagnostic devices. Lab. Chip 13, 2210-2251. ( 10.1039/c3lc50169h) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Metkar SK, Girigoswami K. 2019. Diagnostic biosensors in medicine – a review. Biocatal. Agricult. Biotechnol. 17, 271-283. ( 10.1016/j.bcab.2018.11.029) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Carr A. 1965. The navigation of the green turtle. Sci. Am. 212, 78-87. ( 10.1038/scientificamerican0565-78) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Scholander PF. 1940. Experimental investigations on the respiratory function in diving mammals and birds. Hvalradets Skrifter 22, 1-131. [Google Scholar]
  • 25.DeVries AL, Wohlschlag DE. 1964. Diving depths of the Weddell seal. Science 145, 292. ( 10.1126/science.145.3629.292) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Eliassen E. 1962. Preliminary results from new methods of investigating the physiology of birds during flight. Ibis 105, 234-237. ( 10.1111/j.1474-919X.1963.tb02497.x) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Frank TH. 1968. Telemetering the electrocardiogram of free swimming Salmo Irideus. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 2, 111-114. ( 10.1109/TBME.1968.4502546) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Kooyman GL. 1966. Maximum diving capacities of the Weddell seal (Leptonychotes weddelli). Science 151, 1553-1554. ( 10.1126/science.151.3717.1553) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Woakes AJ, Butler PJ. 1975. An implantable transmitter for monitoring heart rate and respiratory frequency in diving ducks. Biotelemetry 2, 153-160. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Priede IG. 1984. A basking shark (Cetorhinus maximus) tracked by satellite together with simultaneous remote sensing. Fish. Res. 2, 201-216. ( 10.1016/0165-7836(84)90003-1) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Hill RD, Schneider RC, Schuette AH, Zapol WM. 1983. Microprocessor-controlled monitoring of bradycardia in free-diving Weddell seals. Antarct. J. US 28, 213-214. [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Hill RD. 1986. Microcomputer monitor and blood sampler for free- diving Weddell seals. J. Appl. Physiol. 61, 1570-1576. ( 10.1152/jappl.1986.61.4.1570) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Wilson RP, Cooper J, Plotz J. 1992. Can we determine when marine endotherms feed? A case study with seabirds. J. Exp. Biol. 167, 267-275. ( 10.1242/jeb.167.1.267) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Vyssotski AL, Serkov AN, Itskov PM, Dell'Omo G, Latanov AV, Wolfer DP, Lipp HP. 2006. Miniature neurologgers for flying pigeons: multichannel EEG and action and field potentials in combination with GPS recording. J. Neurophysiol. 95, 1263-1273. ( 10.1152/jn.00879.2005) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Wilmers CC, Nickel B, Bryce CM, Smith JA, Wheat RE, Yovovich V. 2015. The golden age of bio-logging: how animal-borne sensors are advancing the frontiers of ecology. Ecology 96, 1741-1753. ( 10.1890/14-1401.1) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Lee MA, et al. 2019. Implanted nanosensors in marine organisms for physiological biologging: design, feasibility, and species variability. ACS Sens. 4, 32-43. ( 10.1021/acssensors.8b00538) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Kooyman GL. 1965. Techniques used in measuring diving capacities of Weddell seals. Polar Rec. 12, 391-394. ( 10.1017/S003224740005484X) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Williams CL, Ponganis PJ. 2021. Diving physiology of marine mammals and birds: the development of biologging techniques. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 376, 20200211. ( 10.1098/rstb.2020.0211) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Boyd IL, Kato A, Ropert-Coudert Y. 2004. Bio-logging science: sensing beyond the boundaries. Mem. Natl Inst. Polar Res. Spec. Issue 58, 1-14. [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Hussey NE, et al. 2015. Aquatic animal telemetry: a panoramic window into the underwater world. Science 348, 1255642. ( 10.1126/science.1255642) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Kays R, Crofoot MC, Jetz W, Wikelski M. 2015. Terrestrial animal tracking as an eye on life and planet. Science 348, aaa2478. ( 10.1126/science.aaa2478) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Palmer A, Greenhough B. 2021. Out of the lab, into the field: perspectives on social, ethical, and regulatory challenges in UK wildlife research. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 376, 20200226. ( 10.1098/rstb.2020.0226) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Laske TG, Garshelis DL, Iles TL, Iaizzo PA. 2021. An engineering perspective on the development and evolution of implantable cardiac monitors in free-living animals. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 376, 20200217. ( 10.1098/rstb.2020.0217) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.MacDonald A, Hawkes LA, Corrigan DK. 2021. Recent advances in medical sensing and biosensor technologies and their potential application in the study of physiology in wild animals. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 376, 20200228. ( 10.1098/rstb.2020.0228) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.King A. 2017. Technology: the future of agriculture. Nature 544, S21-SS3. ( 10.1038/544S21a) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Jukan A, Masip-Bruin X, Amla N. 2017. Smart computing and sensing technologies for animal welfare: a systematic review. ACM Comput. Surv. 50, Article 10. ( 10.1145/3041960) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Brijs J, Føre M, Gräns A, Clark TD, Axelsson M, Johansen JL. 2021. Bio-sensing technologies in aquaculture: how remote monitoring can bring us closer to our farm animals. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 376, 20200218. ( 10.1098/rstb.2020.0218) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Su X, Sutarlie L, Jun Loh X. 2020. Sensors, biosensors, and analytical technologies for aquaculture water quality. Research 2020, 8272705. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Perrey S, Ferrari M. 2018. Muscle oximetry in sports science: a systematic review. Sports Med. 48, 597-616. ( 10.1007/s40279-017-0820-1) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Mcknight JC, et al. 2021. When the human brain goes diving: using NIRS to measure cerebral and systemic cardiovascular responses to deep. Breath-hold diving in elite freedivers. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 376, 20200349. ( 10.1098/rstb.2020.0349) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Mcknight JC, et al. 2021. Shining new light on sensory brain activation and physiological measurement in seals using wearable optical technology. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 376, 20200224. ( 10.1098/rstb.2020.0224) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Linek N, Volkmer T, Shipley JR, Twining CW, Zúñiga D, Wikelski M, Partecke J. 2021. A songbird adjusts its heart rate and body temperature in response to season and fluctuating daily conditions. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 376, 20200213. ( 10.1098/rstb.2020.0213) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Twardek WM, Ekström A, Eliason EJ, Lennox RJ, Tuononen E, Abrams AEI, Jeanson AL, Cooke SJ. 2021. Field assessments of heart rate dynamics during spawning migration of wild and hatchery-reared Chinook salmon. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 376, 20200214. ( 10.1098/rstb.2020.0214) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Aoki K, Watanabe YY, Inamori D, Funasaka N, Sakamoto KQ. 2021. Towards non-invasive heart rate monitoring in free-ranging cetaceans: a unipolar suction cup tag measured the heart rate of trained Risso's dolphins. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 376, 20200225. ( 10.1098/rstb.2020.0225) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Sakamoto KQ, Miyayama M, Kinoshita C, Fukuoka T, Ishihara T, Sato K. 2021. A non-invasive system to measure heart rate in hard-shelled sea turtles: potential for field applications. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 376, 20200222. ( 10.1098/rstb.2020.0222) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Wascher CAF. 2021. Heart rate as a measure of emotional arousal in evolutionary biology. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 376, 20200479. ( 10.1098/rstb.2020.0479) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Aulsebrook AE, Connelly F, Johnsson RD, Jones TM, Mulder RA, Hall ML, Vyssotski AL, Lesku JA. 2020. White and amber light at night disrupt sleep physiology in birds. Curr. Biol. 30, 3657-3663. ( 10.1016/j.cub.2020.06.085) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Lyamin OI, Kosenko PO, Korneva SM, Vyssotski AL, Mukhametov LM, Siegel JM. 2018. Fur seals suppress REM sleep for very long periods without subsequent rebound. Curr. Biol. 28, 2000-2005. ( 10.1016/j.cub.2018.05.022) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Blawas AM, Nowacek DP, Rocho-Levine J, Robeck TR, Fahlman A. 2021. Scaling of heart rate with breathing frequency and body mass in cetaceans. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 376, 20200223. ( 10.1098/rstb.2020.0223) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Hooker SK, Andrews RD, Arnould JPY, Bester MN, Davis RW, Insley SJ, Gales NJ, Goldsworthy SD, McKnight JC. et al. 2021. Fur seals do, but sea lions don't—cross taxa insights into exhalation during ascent from dives. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 376, 20200219. ( 10.1098/rstb.2020.0219) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Parr N, Bishop CM, Batbayar N, Butler PJ, Chua B, Milsom WK, Scott GR, Hawkes LA. 2019. Tackling the Tibetan Plateau in a down suit: insights into thermoregulation by bar-headed geese during migration. J. Exp. Biol. 222, jeb203695. ( 10.1242/jeb.203695) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Trondrud LM, et al. 2021. Determinants of heart rate in Svalbard reindeer reveal mechanisms of seasonal energy management. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 376, 20200215. ( 10.1098/rstb.2020.0215) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Nassar JM, Khan SM, Velling S. 2018. Compliant lightweight non-invasive standalone ‘Marine Skin’ tagging system. Flex. Electron. 2, 13. ( 10.1038/s41528-018-0025-1) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Kaidaorva A, Marengo M, Marinaro G, Geraldi NR, Wilson R, Duarte CM, Kosel J. 2019. Flexible, four-electrode conductivity cell for biologging applications. Results Mat. 1, 100009. ( 10.1016/j.rinma.2019.100009) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Williams HJ, Shipley JR, Rutz C, Wikelski M, Wilkes M LAH. 2021. Future trends in measuring physiology in free-living animals. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 376, 20200230. ( 10.1098/rstb.2020.0230) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Cooke SJ, et al. 2021. One hundred research questions in conservation physiology for generating actionable evidence to inform conservation policy and practice. Conserv. Physiol. 9, coab009. ( 10.1093/conphys/coab009) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Wilson RP, Holton MD, Teilmann J, Siebert U. 2021. Animal tag technology keeps coming of age: an engineering perspective. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 376, 20200229. ( 10.1098/rstb.2020.0229) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Harrison X. 2021.   A brief introduction to the analysis of time series data from biologging studies. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 376, 20200227. ( 10.1098/rstb.2020.0227) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Ponganis PJ. 2019. State of the art review: from the seaside to the bedside: insights from comparative diving physiology into respiratory, sleep and critical care. Thorax 74, 512-518. ( 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2018-212136) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Williams TM, Davis RW. 2021. Physiological resiliency in diving mammals: insights on hypoxia protection using the Krogh principle to understand COVID-19 symptoms. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. Part A Mol. Integr. Physiol. 253, 110849. ( 10.1016/j.cbpa.2020.110849) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Wilkes M, MacInnis MJ, Witt MJ, Vergalla M, Thomas A, Hawkes LA. 2017. Free flight physiology: paragliding and the study of extreme altitude. High Alt. Med. Biol. 18, 90-91. ( 10.1089/ham.2016.0135) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Belyaev MY, Volkov ON, Solomina ON, Weppler J, Mueller U, Tertitski GM, Wikelski M, Pitz W. 2020. Development of technology for monitoring animal migration on Earth using scientific equipment on the ISS RS. In IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 27th Saint Petersburg Int. Conf. on Integrated Navigation Systems (ICINS), pp. 1-7. ( 10.23919/ICINS43215.2020.9133883) [DOI] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

This article has no additional data.


Articles from Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences are provided here courtesy of The Royal Society

RESOURCES