Skip to main content
The Journal of Infectious Diseases logoLink to The Journal of Infectious Diseases
letter
. 2019 Oct 3;221(5):851–852. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jiz504

Six penA Codons Accurately and Reliably Predict Cefixime-Decreased Susceptibility in Neisseria gonorrhoeae

Xiaomeng Deng 1, Jeffrey D Klausner 1,2,3,
PMCID: PMC8202096  PMID: 31581294

To the Editor—We read with great interest the article by Thomas et al [1], describing the whole-genome-sequencing data of 649 US-based Neisseria gonorrhoeae strains with decreased susceptibility to cephalosporins and azithromycin collected through the Centers for Disease Control’s Gonococcal Isolate Surveillance Project. The World Health Organization recommends cefixime, an oral third-generation cephalosporin, for the treatment of gonorrhea either in combination with 1 gram of oral azithromycin or alone as a single drug if recent local resistance data confirm susceptibility [2]. Previous investigators have shown that infections with gonococcal strains with a cefixime minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) ≥0.12 µg/mL were significantly more likely to fail cefixime treatment than strains with MIC <0.12 µg/mL. Among the 649 strains, 121 had cefixime-decreased susceptibility (defined as MIC ≥0.12 µg/mL) [3].

We previously described that the penA gene for N gonorrhoeae penicillin-binding protein-2 reliably predicts cefixime-decreased susceptibility [4]. We found 6 codons in penA (amino acid position 375–377, 501, 542, and 551) that, when any 1 codon was mutated, predicted cefixime-decreased susceptibility in 413 (99.5%) of those 415 strains collected globally between 1996 and 2017 [4].

Using sequence data from the additional 121 strains with decreased susceptibility to cefixime reported by Thomas et al [1], our 6-codon algorithm correctly predicted cefixime-decreased susceptibility in 115 (95.9%). Combining our prior work with that of Thomas et al [1], the accuracy was 528 (98.5%) of 536. The genetic and epidemiologic characteristics of the 8 strains that were not identified by our algorithm are varied and do not contain the typical mosaic penA mutations associated with extended-spectrum cephalosporin- decreased susceptibility (Table 1).

Table 1.

Characteristics of the 8 Cefixime-Decreased Susceptible Gonococcal Strains That Had No Alterations at Amino Acid Position 375–377, 501, 542, or 551 of penA

Reference Accession Number Year of Collection Country of Collection penA type by NG-STARa Cefixime MIC (µg/mL)
[7] No report 2013 Spain Resembling 36b ≥0.125c
No report 2013 Spain Resembling 36b ≥0.125c
[1] SRR8071198 2014 USA 2 0.125
SRR8071266 2015 USA 14 0.125
SRR8071414 2016 USA 14 0.125
SRR8071120 2014 USA 19 0.125
SRR8071395 2016 USA 19 0.125
SRR5990438 2016 USA 68 0.25

Abbreviations: MIC, minimum inhibitory concentration; NG-STAR, Neisseria gonorrhoeae sequence typing for antimicrobial resistance.

a Neisseria gonorrhoeae sequence typing for antimicrobial resistance (https://ngstar.canada.ca).

bComplete nucleotide or amino acid sequence data were not reported by the authors.

cSpecific MIC value was not reported by the authors.

We have verified that the parsimonious 6-codon molecular assay that we recently proposed would successfully predict cefixime-decreased susceptibility in a very high proportion of N gonorrhoeae strains with cefixime-decreased susceptibility currently circulating. We propose that surveillance efforts monitor mutations in those 6 codons in penA using real-time polymerase chain reaction methods [5] to supplement conventional phenotypic monitoring of antimicrobial resistance in N gonorrhoeae.

In addition, the development and implementation of such an assay for clinical use could make cefixime an effective alternative to dual therapy or injectable high-dose ceftriaxone therapy in settings where cefixime-decreased susceptibility is a concern [6]. In settings where cefixime-decreased susceptibility is rare, resistance-guided therapy could help slow down the continued emergence of antimicrobial resistance in N gonorrhoeae.

Notes

Financial support. Funding was provided by the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, Grant R21 AI117256 (to J. D. K.).

Potential conflicts of interest. All authors: No reported conflicts of interest. All authors have submitted the ICMJE Form for Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest.

References

  • 1. Thomas  JC, Seby  S, Abrams  AJ, et al.  Evidence of recent genomic evolution in gonococcal strains with decreased susceptibility to cephalosporins or azithromycin in the United States, 2014-2016. J Infect Dis  2019; 220:294–305. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. World Health Organization. WHO  guidelines for the treatment of Neisseria gonorrhoeae. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Allen VG, Mitterni L, Seah C, et al. Neisseria gonorrhoeae treatment failure and susceptibility to cefixime in Toronto, Canada. JAMA 2013; 309:163–170. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Deng  X, Allan-Blitz  LT, Klausner JD. Using the genetic characteristics of Neisseria gonorrhoeae strains with decreased susceptibility to cefixime to develop a molecular assay to predict cefixime susceptibility. Sex Health  2019; 16:488–499. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Wong  L, Hemarajata  P, Soge  O, Humphries  R, Klausner  J. Real-time PCR targeting the penA mosaic XXXIV type for prediction of extended-spectrum-cephalosporin susceptibility in clinical Neisseria gonorrhoeae isolates. Antimicrob Agents Chemother  2017; 61. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Wi  T, Lahra  MM, Ndowa  F, et al.  Antimicrobial resistance in Neisseria gonorrhoeae: Global surveillance and a call for international collaborative action. PLoS Med  2017; 14:e1002344. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Serra-Pladevall  J, Barberá  MJ, Rodriguez  S, et al.  Neisseria gonorrhoeae antimicrobial susceptibility in Barcelona: penA, ponA, mtrR, and porB mutations and NG-MAST sequence types associated with decreased susceptibility to cephalosporins. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis  2016; 35:1549–56. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Infectious Diseases are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES