Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Animal Reproduction logoLink to Animal Reproduction
. 2018 Aug 17;15(3):239–246. doi: 10.21451/1984-3143-AR2018-0059

Use of Doppler ultrasonography in embryo transfer programs: feasibility and field results

Guilherme Pugliesi 1,✉, Gabriela Dalmaso de Melo 1, Gilmar Arantes Ataíde Jr 1, Carlos Augusto Gontijo Pellegrino 2, Júlio Barboza Silva 3, Cecília Constantino Rocha 1, Igor Garcia Motta 1, José Luiz Moraes Vasconcelos 4, Mario Binelli 5
PMCID: PMC8202456  PMID: 34178147

Abstract

The intensive use of Doppler ultrasonography in several studies in the last decade allowed the characterization of vascular perfusion and the estimation of function of the reproductive organs and tissues along the estrous cycle and pregnancy in cattle. We aim to discuss the possibility of using Doppler imaging and to explore the potential of its inclusion in reproductive programs in cattle industry. Recent studies in dairy and beef cows indicated a high accuracy and sensitivity when Doppler ultrasonography is used to evaluate corpus luteum function and to diagnosis pregnancy between days 20 and 22. Moreover, resynchronization programs starting 5 to 7 days after timed embryo transfer (FTET) coupled with early pregnancy diagnosis were developed for beef cattle, and have been implemented in commercial embryo transfer programs. These strategies allow a reduction in the interval between two FTET from ≈ 40 to 24 days and may improve the gains in reproductive efficiency when compared to traditional programs than begin resynchronization after the pregnancy diagnosis at 30 days. A second alternative to use Doppler imaging is the evaluation of luteal blood perfusion at the time of embryo transfer for selection of recipients with greater receptivity potential. This may increases fertility in FTET, as embryos would not be transferred to females with non-functional CL, and in cases with recipients surplus, females with higher receptivity would be prioritized.

Keywords: blood flow, corpus luteum, pregnancy. Uterus

Introduction

Already in the 1980s, it was stated by the researcher Dr. O. J. Ginther that “since the introduction of transrectal palpation and the radioimmunoassay for circulating hormones, real-time ultrasonography is the most profound technological advance in the field of reproductive research and clinic of large animals” ( Ginther, 1986 ). During the last decades, the use of ultrasound imaging has reached great dimensions in research centers and commercial livestock activities, enabling great improvements in clinical diagnosis and reproductive efficiency of dairy and beef herds.

Among the several options, conventional ultrasonography in brightness mode (B, gray scale) provides a real-time, two-dimensional image of organs and structures ( Ginther, 1995 ; 1998 ). Thus, routine use of B-mode ultrasonography provides the possibility of a better evaluation of bovine females to initiate an artificial insemination (AI) program or the quality of recipients to receive embryos in embryo transfer (ET) programs. More recently, Doppler ultrasonography also started to be used in research to evaluate the reproductive system of horses and cattle throughout the estrous cycle and during pregnancy (Bollwein e al., 2002; Ginther, 2007 ). Its potential use is due to the ability to assess the functionality of organs and tissues based on lower or higher blood perfusion. In the last 10 years, the annual average number of research studies in the field of bovine reproduction using this technology almost doubled relative to the previous decade (14.7 vs. 7.9; ScienceDirect). Among the several possibilities for evaluation, Doppler ultrasonography has been used as a non-invasive and real-time technique to estimate the functionality of the corpus luteum (CL) for selection of recipients and for early pregnancy diagnosis in fixed-time AI (FTAI) and ET (FTET) programs (Siqueira e al., 2013; Pugliesi e al., 2014; 2016).

Thus, we aim with this manuscript to discuss the potential uses of Doppler ultrasonography in cattle and highlight recent results of its inclusion in commercial FTET programs.

Use of ultrasonography in bovine reproduction

In applied reproductive, transrectal ultrasonography has become an important tool for evaluating the female reproductive tract in cattle. Ultrasound allowed the evaluation of reproductive organs for several purposes, such as: to monitor follicular dynamics; examination of the ovulation process; CL morphology; pregnancy diagnosis, evaluation of embryo and fetal viability; and several diagnoses of pathological changes in the female reproductive organs and tissues ( Ginther, 1995 ). Currently, its use in bovine reproductive practice focuses on the pregnancy diagnosis after 28 days, evaluation of cyclicity, and diagnosis of reproductive diseases such as ovarian cysts and uterine infections in the postpartum period ( Ginther, 1998 ).

Ultrasonography has also been constantly used in research cent and by veterinarians. However, correct evaluation and ultrasound image quality are dependent on the operator's experience and knowledge regarding the interactions between the sound wave and the tissues and organs, as well as the correct equipment setup (DesCôteaux e al., 2005). The greater accessibility to good quality equipment and training facilitated the incorporation of ultrasonographic evaluations into reproductive programs in dairy and beef cows. Because of these valuable features and uses, ultrasonography has become the “gold standard” for assessing the reproductive status and response of cows to reproductive programs of AI and ET ( Ginther, 1998 ; Pugliesi e al., 2017).

Possible reproductive evaluations with Doppler ultrasonography

Principles and forms of evaluation

Doppler ultrasonography is a relatively recent technique in veterinary medicine, and this equipment uses the difference between the frequencies of the reflected waves and waves sent by the transducer (“Doppler shift”; Szatmari e al., 2001). In blood circulation, this difference occurs due to the movement of red cells that promote a positive (higher frequency) or negative (lower frequency) difference based in the movement towards or in the opposite direction of the transducer, respectively.

Most of the currently Doppler ultrasound equipments allow three modes of assessing blood perfusion: spectral mode (pulse-wave), power-doppler mode and color-doppler mode. The Spectral mode allows the difference in frequency detected by the instrument to be projected on a two-dimensional chart as a function of time, and a Doppler waveform is formed during the cardiac cycle when assessing blood flow in arteries ( Ginther, 2007 ). In this mode, some indices are automatically calculated by the equipment software (resistance and pulsatility indices) and are useful for estimating blood perfusion in tissues irrigated by the assessed vessel ( Ginther, 2007 ). In Color-Doppler equipment, frequency differences are coded as colored signals over a conventional B-mode image ( Figure 1 , Panels A and B). Positive (blood flow towards to transducer) and negative (blood flow in the opposite direction of the transducer) differences are indicated by different colors, which are usually in shades of red to yellow and blue to green (Ginther e al., 2007). The Power-Doppler mode allows the measurement of blood flow intensity (i.e., the number of blood cells moving in the vessel per unit of time) and the image shows different color intensity according to the intensity of the flow in each point of the evaluated area ( Ginther, 2007 ). Colored representations of blood perfusion on the screen can be estimated by the proportion of tissue with colored signals or calculated by software on the amount of colored pixels ( Ginther, 2007 ; Pugliesi e al., 2014). Another alternative for evaluation is the subjective determination through a scale of 0 to 4 for the evaluated area ( Silva and Ginther, 2010 ; Lemes e al., 2017).

Figure 1. Ultrasound images of bovine ovary showing corpus luteum (CL). Panels A and B: B-mode image (A) and Color-Doppler mode (B, detection limit: 0.04m/sec) of a non-active CL; Panels C and D: B-mode image (C) and Color-Doppler mode (D-detection limit: 0.04m/sec) of an active CL.

Figure 1

Open in a new tab

Evaluation of uterine blood flow

Among all the possible applications of ultrasonography, scanning the uterus for detection of pregnancy and infections are the main commercial practices in the bovine industry. In cattle, Doppler ultrasonography was initially used to detect fetal circulation ( Mitchell, 1973 ). Also, uterus hemodynamics can be accessed by color and spectral modes, to evaluate, respectively, blood perfusion in the endometrium and mesometrium, and resistance and pulsatility indexes in the middle uterine artery (Bollwein e al., 2016).

Blood perfusion in the bovine uterus has a well-defined pattern during the estrous cycle. During proestrus and estrus, high values of blood flow are observed; while at diestrus, the flow remains at a low, but constant rate (Bollwein e al., 2016). These changes are directly associated with the circulating concentrations of progesterone (P4) and estradiol. In pregnant cows, at the beginning of the third week, there is an increase in blood perfusion in the pregnant horn compared to the non-pregnant horn ( Silva and Ginther, 2010 ). However, due to the great variability in the blood flow among animals, it is not possible to make an early pregnancy diagnosis with a simple measurement of the uterine blood flow using Doppler ultrasonography ( Silva and Ginther, 2010 ).

Evaluation of ovarian structures

Due to the ability to indirectly assess the function of structures and tissues, Doppler ultrasonography was widely used to evaluate the function of the dominant follicle and CL throughout the estrous cycle in mares and cows (Acosta e al., 2005; Siddiqui e al ., 2009; Herzog e al., 2010; Ginther e al., 2014), and more recently, in small ruminants (Balaro e al., 2017). Several studies indicated a positive association between vascularization and follicular function (reviewed in Viana e al., 2013), since the development of follicles is related to the formation of the vascular network in the theca interna. Thereby, a higher blood perfusion is observed in the follicular wall of dominant and pre-ovulatory follicles compared to small follicles (Miyamoto e al., 2006).

Similarly, treatments that promote greater growth of the dominant follicle result in a more vascularized pre-ovulatory follicle with a greater capacity for estradiol secretion (Mesquita e al., 2014; Pugliesi e al., 2016a). Therefore, evaluation of the wall vascularization in dominant follicles at the onset of pro-estrus or pre-ovulatory follicles could indicate follicular function and be a tool to predict pregnancy success. However, in cattle the evaluation of the vascularization in the wall of the pre-ovulatory follicle on the day of FTAI did not indicate any relation with pregnancy rate (Pinaffi e al., 2015).

Ultrasonography assessment of CL with consequent estimation of its functional status is an important aspect for reproductive management and was initially developed as a diagnostic tool in addition to transrectal palpation in cattle. Although the assessment of luteal size is positively correlated with circulating P4 concentrations, during the CL regression period this correlation is lower because the rates of decrease are faster for P4 than for CL size (Kastelic e al., 1990; Assey e al., 1993). Thus, evaluation of vascularization in luteal tissue may represent more accurately the function of CL due to the high vascular network present in this transient endocrine gland (Bollwein e al ., 2002, 2012).

In addition, evaluation of blood perfusion in CL can be very useful because higher P4 concentrations at the beginning of the diestrus are related to the greater development of the conceptus ( Mann and Lamming, 2001 ), and associated with a higher pregnancy probability. As observed in follicles, increased luteal vascularization at early diestrus (days 4-7 after ovulation) also indicated a greater chance of pregnancy success in one study (Pugliesi e al., 2016a), but not in another (Pinaffi e al., 2015). These differences can be derived from the different moments and criteria of the evaluations carried out in these investigations.

Luteolysis detection for early pregnancy diagnosis

Although discrete anechoic structures suggestive of the embryonic vesicle may already be observed by ultrasound between 12-14 days of pregnancy ( Pierson and Ginther, 1984 ) and the embryo can already be identified between 19-24 days (Hazen and Delsaux, 1987), ultrasound-based pregnancy diagnosis in B-mode is only recommended after 28-30 days (Pieterse e al ., 1990). This occurs because the sensitivity and accuracy in the conceptus visualization only reach 100% when diagnosis is performed after this stage of gestation (Nation e al., 2003). However, in non-pregnant cows, estrus will normally return between 18 and 24 days after ovulation, once CL regression takes place, which normally occurs between days 15 and 18 of the cycle (Ginther e al., 2010; Pugliesi e al ., 2013). Thus, it has been suggested that CL evaluation at time points close to its regression or maternal recognition of pregnancy could allow an earlier assessment to gestational status (Pugliesi e al. 2014; Scully e al., 2015).

The use of ultrasonography for early pregnancy diagnosis (first 21 days of pregnancy) was initially evaluated by Kastelic e al. (1989, 1991). These authors reported that the assessment of CL size using B-mode provided low accuracy (<75%) before day 18 after insemination. However, higher accuracy (90-100%) was observed when the evaluation is performed between days 20 and 22. Although assessing CL size provides good accuracy, circulating P4 concentrations, which indicate luteal function, have a greater correlation with blood perfusion than with CL size during the luteolytic period in ruminants (Herzog e al ., 2010; Balaro e al., 2017; Rocha e al., 2017). This possible advantage allowed more in-depth studies on blood perfusion in spontaneous and induced luteolysis in cows and heifers (Ginther e al., 2007; 2010; Shrestha e al., 2011; Pugliesi e al., 2012). Other studies (Utt e al., 2009; Pugliesi e al., 2014; Scully e al ., 2014; 2015) also characterized the changes in CL vascularization between pregnant and non-pregnant cows. The results allowed the definition of vascularization characteristics and size of CL during luteolysis and served as a basis for the conception of a criterion to identify a functional or non-functional CL (Pugliesi e al., 2014).

Some studies indicated that Doppler ultrasonography could be used as a method for early pregnancy diagnosis (Matsui and Myamoto, 2009; Quintela e al., 2012). Siqueira e al (2013) reported a high accuracy and almost 100% of sensitivity on early diagnosis of non-pregnant dairy cattle at 20 days after insemination using just CL vascularization as a criterion. In beef herds, we observed 100% of sensitivity and 91% of accuracy when considering CL vascularization and size to determine pregnancy status on day 20 post-AI (Pugliesi e al., 2014). These results suggest that Doppler is an accurate tool for early pregnancy diagnosis because there is a low possibility of erroneously diagnosing a pregnant cow as non-pregnant (false negatives near to 0%).

In Siqueira e al. (2013) females were considered non-pregnant when they did not show colored signs indicating blood flow in the central region of CL. In Nelore beef cows (Pugliesi e al., 2014), it was determined that non-pregnant females would have colored signs indicating blood flow ≤25% of its area and size <2cm 2 ( Fig. 1 ). This subjective evaluation can be transformed into a simpler and more practical scale through vascularization scores (Pugliesi e al., 2017). Thus, it is easier to understand and evaluate CL functionality.

When reduced CL blood perfusion and size are used together to identify a non-pregnant female, there are lower chances of false negatives, because the criterion becomes more rigid, avoiding the underestimation of vascularization, false negative results and economic loss (Pugliesi e al., 2014). On the other hand, the proportion of false positive results (proportion of cows diagnosed as pregnant by Doppler, but actually not pregnant by conventional ultrasonography on day 30) should also be considered. False positive can occur due to several factors that lead to the presence of a functional CL on the day of diagnosis, such as late ovulation to the synchronization protocol and longer estrous cycle (>22 days) in some animals. However, most of the false positives results observed with Doppler ultrasonography may come from embryo losses between early diagnosis (days 20-22) and conventional diagnosis (day 30). This is indicated by the higher proportion of false positive results in dairy cattle (Siqueira e al. 2013) compared to beef cattle (Pugliesi e al., 2014), in which pregnancy losses are normally lower (Diskin e al., 2016).

Applications in commercial FTET programs

The possibility of evaluating CL functionality during the estrous cycle allowed the development of some techniques to include Doppler ultrasonography into FTAI and FTET programs. Nevertheless, ultrasound equipment should be appropriately configured for the chosen brand and model, and this is extremely important because the amount of colored signals on the display is highly influenced by the type of setting (frequency, number of frames per second, power, Doppler gain and pulse rate). In general, it is suggested a configuration that allows a minimum detectable velocity around 4-6 cm/sec ( Ginther, 2007 ). Although the cost of a portable Doppler machine is still 3 to 4 times greater than the cost of B-mode equipment, it has been reducing over the last years, which made it possible for practitioners to acquire such equipment for commercial use in FTAI and FTET programs.

Use for early pregnancy diagnosis in FTET programs

Diagnosing non-pregnant cows with high accuracy between 20 and 22 days post-insemination allowed the development of new strategies to reduce the interval between FTAI or FTET procedures in a breeding season ( Fig. 2 ). Among these strategies, performing a second FTET in an interval of only 24 days after the first FTET is highlighted. This promotes a 16-day reduction in the interval between two FTET when compared to the traditional system, which only start resynchronization of ovulation in non-pregnant females 23 days after ET (30 days of possible pregnancy), or an 8-days anticipation compared to the early system that resynchronizes all cows at 22 days of pregnancy. However, this anticipation is only possible with the early pregnancy diagnosis by Doppler ultrasonography between 20-22 days and an early resynchronization of ovulation 5-7 days after FTET (12 to 14 days of the estrous cycle).

Figure 2. Schematic illustration of three different strategies of resynchronization in fixed time embryo transfer (FTET) programs in cattle. Super-early resynchronization may starts between 5-7 days post-FTET and a pregnancy diagnosis by Doppler ultrasonography is needed between 20-22 days of pregnancy. Early resynchronization usually starts 15 days post-FTET and conventional pregnancy diagnosis is performed on day 30 of pregnancy. Conventional resynchronization is performed after pregnancy diagnosis on day 30 of pregnancy. Service rate was calculated as the proportion of a 21-day period of normal estrous cycle in the period between two consecutives FTET procedures of each strategy.

Figure 2

Open in a new tab

The possibility of initiating resynchronization after early diagnosis with Doppler was initially evaluated in 165 embryo recipients at 21 days, aiming to improve reproductive management in FTET programs (Guimarães e al., 2015). In this study, the early pregnancy diagnosis was performed by evaluation of CL vascularization score, in addition to the information about the presence and side of CL evaluated on the day of embryo transfer (day 7). This helped to distinguish young CLs, which have a reduced size, but high vascularization. When compared to the conventional pregnancy diagnosis on day 30, accuracy and sensitivity of early diagnosis at day 21 observed were 88.3% and 100%, respectively. This diagnosis enabled 80% of non-pregnant recipients to be diagnosed at 21 days and resynchronized for a new FTET program.

Recently, we evaluated the reproductive performance of beef recipient cows evaluated by Doppler ultrasonography to detect CL regression at day 22 of pregnancy and submitted to two protocols for FTET in 24 days (Pellegrino e al., 2018; unpublished data). In this study, suckling Nelore cows were submitted to a P4/estradiol based protocol for FTET. On Day 7 (Day 0 = expected ovulation), cows were evaluated by transrectal ultrasonography using a B-mode and color Doppler ultrasound instrument and received a fresh in vitro -produced embryo. On Day13, resynchronization was initiated by treating cows with high doses of P4 (new P4 intravaginal device and 100 mg of injectable P4), as administration of estradiol esters at this phase of the cycle may induce CL regression (Vieira e al ., 2014). On Day 22, P4 devices were removed and cows were evaluated by ultrasonography. On Day 22, 48.3% (102 of 211) of recipients were diagnosed as non-pregnant by Doppler ultrasonography (CL with <25% of color signals indicating blood perfusion in the luteal area), ovulation was induced with 1 mg of estradiol cypionate and 25 mg of dinoprost tromethamide was given. On Day 31, non-pregnant cows were evaluated and those with a new CL received an embryo. This strategy allows a 24d-interval between FTETs. On Day 80, 67.8% (75/109) of recipients diagnosed as pregnant on Day 22 were still pregnant. At the second FTET, the utilization rate of recipients was 81.4% (83/102) and pregnancy rate for transferred recipients was 48.1% (38/79). Cumulative pregnancy rate after first and second FTET was 53.6% (113/211). These results indicated that the use of early detection of non-pregnant cows at Day 22 by Doppler ultrasonography associated with resynchronization of ovulation 6 days after FTET results in suitable pregnancy and utilization rates.

Because of the high cost of a portable Doppler equipment, the single use of CL size accessed by B-mode ultrasonography for the detection of luteolysis was recently evaluated by our group (Ataide Jr e al., 2018; FMVZ, Universidade de São Paulo, Pirassununga, SP, Brazil; unpublished data), but results indicated a lower accuracy and a high rate of false-negative exams. The reproductive performance of beef recipients was evaluated by B and Doppler modes ultrasonography to detect CL regression and submitted to two protocols for FTET in 24 days. Pregnancy diagnosis on Day 22 in the B-mode method was compared with the Doppler mode (gold standard). For the B-mode evaluation, cows with a CL <2cm2 were considered non-pregnant. Pregnancy diagnoses agreed between B and Doppler modes in 95.3% (201/211). The incorrect results were 8 false-negatives (non-pregnant for B-mode but pregnant for Doppler method) and 2 false-positives (pregnant for B-mode but non-pregnant for Doppler method). For FTAI, a similar comparison between B-mode and color-Doppler evaluation on day 22 of pregnancy indicated a higher false negative rate (15-20%). This proportion was greater in heifers, which have smaller CL compared to cows (Pugliesi e al., 2018; FMVZ, Universidade de São Paulo, Pirassununga, SP, Brazil; unpublished data).

Early resynchronization can shorten the breeding season, providing more days of weight gain to calves that are born earlier, especially when compared to resynchronization after the conventional pregnancy diagnosis (after 30 days of pregnancy). However, future studies are needed to define the best hormones and doses for synchronization of follicle wave emergence 5-7 days after ET, in the mid-cycle phase. First attempts indicated that estradiol esters might have a negative effect on CL maintenance, since in Holstein cows treatment with 1.5 mg of estradiol benzoate 13 days after FTAI induced luteolysis (Vieira e al ., 2014). Therefore, treatments with high doses of injectable P4 may efficiently suppress gonadotropins and induce new follicle wave, and hence have been preferred (Cavallieri e al., 2018). Nevertheless, recent data from our group have indicated that lower doses (1 mg) of estradiol benzoate or an injectable formulation of estradiol and P4 on day 14 after FTAI did not impair CL function or pregnancy maintenance in Nelore heifers (Motta e al., 2018; unpublished data). The choice of the resynchronization model depends on the production system adopted in each farm, and availability of the veterinarian’s staff for pregnancy diagnosis exams.

Selection of recipients in FTET programs

In ET programs following estrus detection or fixed-time, one of the most important factors to determine the use of a recipient is the presence of a good quality CL. This quality is traditionally evaluated through the selection of recipients by transrectal palpation or by gray-scale ultrasonography to determine CL size. However, these strategies may result in ET to a non-receptive uterus due to the presence of a low or non-functional CL, since luteal functionality (P4 secretion) cannot be accessed by these evaluations. Thus, Pinaffi e al. (2015) evaluated recipients using Doppler ultrasonography on the day of ET and retrospectively classified these females as having Low (<40% of colored signals indicating CL vascularity) or High (>40%) luteal vascularization. Despite the small number of animals used in this study, it was verified that none (0 out of 12) of the recipients with low vascularization in CL were later diagnosed as pregnant; however, the pregnancy rate was 48.4% (n = 15/31) in recipients with high luteal vascularization. In this study, even with the difference in the proportion of vascularization between groups, the mean CL diameter was similar in cows with low (17.5 mm) or high (17 mm) CL vascularization.

Recently, we studied (Pugliesi e al. 2016b) the impact of size and luteal blood perfusion assessed by Color Doppler ultrasonography at the time of ET on pregnancy rates in crossbred recipients (n = 329) with estrous cycle synchronized to allow FTET. The recipients were retrospectively divided into two subgroups according to CL size (small [<3cm 2] or large [>3cm2]) and three subgroups according to luteal blood perfusion (low [<40%], medium [45 50%] or high [>55%]; Fig. 3 ). Cows where CL was present but was not active (<25% of blood perfusion; Fig. 1 ) were not used (9.5%). Only luteal blood perfusion affected pregnancy rate. This reflected a progressive increase in the pregnancy rate associated with increased luteal vascularization (low, 45.1%, [37/82]; medium, 55.9% [57/102]; and high, 62.3% [38/61]). In a subsequent experiment (unpublished data), recipients were evaluated on the day of FTET and the CL classified according to luteal vascularization proposed above and a classification of scores (0 to 4; 0 = no perfusion and 4 = high perfusion). Agreeing with previous results, we observed a 41% increase in pregnancy rate in recipients with high luteal vascularization compared to the ones with low vascularization. Similar difference were also observed using the central CL vascularization scores system, in which the pregnancy rate was 29% greater in cows with score 3 (62%, 44/71) compared to scores 1 and 2 (48.2%, 53/110). Although serum P4 concentrations have only differed between low and high categories, it is believed that the greater pregnancy rate in recipients with high luteal vascularity is related to the greater secretion of P4 by luteal tissue.

Figure 3. Ultrasound images of bovine ovary showing corpus luteum (CL) and follicles. Panels A, C and E: B-mode images (brightness, gray-scale); Panels B, D and F: Color-Doppler images (detection limit: 0.04m/sec) indicating, respectively, low, medium and high CL blood perfusion.

Figure 3

Open in a new tab

Thereby, it can be observed from these studies that Doppler ultrasonography can be used to discard recipients with a non-functional CL and select recipients that would have a better receptivity. This would be an alternative to increase the chances of pregnancy establishment in higher rank embryos. Also, Doppler imaging could promote a gain in reproductive efficiency in FTET programs since there would be less embryo loss, as embryos would not be transferred to females with non-functional CL, and in cases of extra recipients numbers, females with medium to high luteal vascularization would be prioritized.

Final considerations

Color-Doppler ultrasonography is a recent and very effective tool to evaluate luteal function in recipient females submitted to ET programs. Doppler imaging can be used to identify non-pregnant recipients earlier by detecting luteolysis or to select the recipient with better receptivity at the moment of ET. The accuracy of pregnancy diagnosis is high when performed among days 20 and 22, despite the different criteria and characteristics considered by the different research groups. Thus, Color-Doppler ultrasonography is a non-invasive and real-time method to estimate luteal activity, and may be used as an innovative strategy for early diagnosis of pregnancy after FTET. In addition, evaluation of CL blood perfusion using Doppler ultrasonography allows the selection of highly receptive recipients and could improve fertility in FTET programs. However, it is necessary to standardize the criteria for evaluation of luteal function in order to have a practical and replicable evaluation by field practitioners. Doppler ultrasonography adoption by veterinarians in cattle reproductive programs will also depend on more studies to improve the hormonal protocols for resynchronization. These features would allow a better diffusion and understanding of the real potential of this biotechnology in ET programs. In addition, the equipment setup and its cost must always be considered to provide accuracy and economic feasibility for this technique.

Acknowledgment

We are grateful for the support of Embryo SYS, Embriotec, Pecuária Sustentável da Amazônia (Pecsa), Zoetis Animal Health, Ourofino Saúde Animal, DPS-Mindray and Dormed in the provision of animals, drugs and equipment for the execution of several studies, and FAPESP for grant and scholarships (Processes: FAPESP 2015/10606-9 , 2016/23964-3 , 2017/13472-9 and 2017/18613-0 ).

References

  1. Acosta TJ , Hayashi KG , Matsui M , Miyamoto A. Changes in follicular vascularity during the first follicular wave in lactating cows . J Reprod Dev. 2005;51:273–280. doi: 10.1262/jrd.16092. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Assey RJ , Purwantara B , Greve T , Hyttel P , Schmidt MH. Corpus luteum size and plasma progesterone levels in cattle after cloprostenol-induced luteolysis . Theriogenology. 1993;39:1321–1330. [Google Scholar]
  3. Balaro MFA , Santos AS , Moura LFGM , Fonseca JF , Brandão FZ. Luteal dynamic and functionality assessment in dairy goats by luteal blood flow, luteal biometry, and hormonal assay . Theriogenology. 2017;95:118–126. doi: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2017.02.021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Bollwein H , Baumgartner U , Stolla R. Transrectal Doppler sonography of uterine blood flow in cows during pregnancy . Theriogenology. 2002;57:2053–2061. doi: 10.1016/s0093-691x(02)00706-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Bollwein H , Lüttgenau J , Herzog K. Bovine luteal blood flow: basic mechanism and clinical relevance . Reprod Fertil Dev. 2012;25:71–79. doi: 10.1071/RD12278. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Bollwein H , Heppelmann M , Lüttgenau J. Ultrasonographic Doppler Use for Female Reproduction Management . Vet Clin North Am Food Anim Pract. 2016;32:149–164. doi: 10.1016/j.cvfa.2015.09.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Cavallieri J. Effect of treatment of Bos indicus heifers with progesterone 0, 3 and 6 days after follicular aspiration on follicular dynamics and the timing of oestrus and ovulation . Anim Reprod Sci. 2018;193:9–18. doi: 10.1016/j.anireprosci.2018.03.026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. DesCôteaux L , Carrière PD , Durocher J. Ultrasonography of the reproductive system of the cow: A 4 languages interactive CD-rom for continuing education of veterinarians. Continuing education services of the University of Montreal . St-Hyacinthe; Québec, Canada: 2005. [Google Scholar]
  9. Diskin MG , Waters SM , Parr MH , Kenny DA. Pregnancy losses in cattle: potential for improvement. Reprod Fertil Dev. 2016;28:83–93. doi: 10.1071/RD15366. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Ginther OJ. Ultrasonic imaging and reproductive event in the mare. Equiservices Publishing; Cross Plains, WI: 1986. pp. 1–12. [Google Scholar]
  11. Ginther OJ. Ultrasonic imaging and animal reproduction: Horses. Equiservices Publishing; Cross Plains, WI: 1995. 394 [Google Scholar]
  12. Ginther OJ. Ultrasonic Imaging and Animal Reproduction: Cattle. Equiservices Publishing; Cross Plains, WI: 1998. pp. 29–58. [Google Scholar]
  13. Ginther OJ. Ultrasonic Imaging and Animal Reproduction: Color-Doppler Ultrasonography . Plains, WI: Equiservices Publishing; 2007. 258 Book 4. Cross. [Google Scholar]
  14. Ginther OJ , Silva LA , Araujo RR , Beg MA. Temporal Associations among pulses of 13, 14-Dihydro-15-keto-PGF2alpha, Luteal Blood Flow, and Luteolysis in Cattle . Biol Reprod. 2007;76:506–513. doi: 10.1095/biolreprod.106.057653. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Ginther OJ , Shrestha HK , Beg MA. Circulating hormone concentrations within a pulse of a metabolite of prostaglandin F2α during preluteolysis and early luteolysis in heifers . Anim Reprod Sci. 2010;122:253–258. doi: 10.1016/j.anireprosci.2010.08.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Ginther OJ , Rakesh HB , Hoffman MM. Blood flow to follicles and CL during devel- opment of the periovulatory follicular wave in heifers . Theriogenology. 2014;82:304–311. doi: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2014.04.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Guimarães CRB , Oliveira ME , Rossi JR , Fernandes CAC , Viana JHM , Palhao MP. Corpus luteum blood flow evaluation on Day 21 to improve the management of embryo recipient herds . Theriogenology. 2015;84:237–241. doi: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2015.03.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Hanzen C , Delsaux B. Use of transrectal B-mode ultrasound imaging in bovine pregnancy diagnosis . Vet Rec. 1987;121:200–202. doi: 10.1136/vr.121.9.200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Herzog K , Brockhan-Lüdemann M , Kaske M , Beindorff N , Paul V , Niemann H , Bollwein H. Luteal blood flow is a more appropriate indicator for luteal function during the bovine estrous cycle than luteal size . Theriogenology. 2010;73:691–697. doi: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2009.11.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Kastelic JP , Curran S , Ginther OJ. Accuracy of ultrasonography for pregnancy diagnosis on days 10 to 22 in heifers . Theriogenology. 1989;31:813–820. doi: 10.1016/0093-691x(89)90026-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Kastelic JP , Bergfelt DR , Ginther OJ. Relationship between ultrasonic assessment of the corpus luteum and plasma progesterone concentration in heifers . Theriogenology. 1990;33:1269–1278. [Google Scholar]
  22. Kastelic JP , Bergfelt DR , Ginther OJ. Ultrasonic-detection of the conceptus and characterization of intrauterine fluid on days 10 to 22 in heifers . Theriogenology. 1991;35:569–581. doi: 10.1016/0093-691x(91)90453-k. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Lemes KM , Silva LA , Alonso MA , Celeghini ECC , Pugliesi G , Carvalho HF , Leite TG , Arruda RP. Uterine vascular perfusion and involution during the postpartum period in mares . J Equine Vet Sci. 2017;51:61–69. [Google Scholar]
  24. Mann GE , Lamming GE. Relationship between maternal endocrine environment, early embryo development and inhibition of the luteolytic mechanism in cows . Reproduction. 2001;121:175–180. doi: 10.1530/rep.0.1210175. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Matsui M , Miyamoto A. Evaluation of ovarian blood flow by colour Doppler ultrasound: practical use for reproductive management in the cow . Vet J. 2009;181:232–240. doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2008.02.027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Mesquita FS , Pugliesi G , Scolari SC , França MR , Ramos RS , Oliveira M , Papa PC , Bressan FF , Meirelles FV , Silva LA , Nogueira GP , Membrive CM , Binelli M. Manipulation of the periovulatory sex steroidal milieu affects endometrial but not luteal gene expression in early diestrus Nelore cows . Theriogenology. 2014;81:861–869. doi: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2013.12.022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Mitchell D. Detection of foetal circulation in the mare and cow by Doppler ultra-sound . Vet Rec. 1973;93:365–368. doi: 10.1136/vr.93.13.365. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Miyamoto A , Shirasuna K , Hayashi KG , Kamada D , Awashima C , Kaneko E , Acosta TJ , Matsui M. A potential use of color ultrasound as a tool for reproductive management: New observations using color ultrasound scanning that were not possible with imaging only in black and white . J Reprod Dev. 2006;52:153–160. doi: 10.1262/jrd.17087. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Nation DP , Malmo J , Davis GM , Macmillan KL. Accuracy of bovine pregnancy detection using transrectal ultrasonography at 28 to 35 days after insemination . Aust Vet J. 2003;81:63–65. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-0813.2003.tb11435.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Pieterse MC , Taverne MA , Kruip TA , Willemse AH. Detection of corpora lutea and follicles in cows: a comparison of transvaginal ultrasonography and rectal palpation . Vet Rec. 1990;126:552–554. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Pierson RA , Ginther OJ. Ultrasonography for detection of pregnancy and study of embryonic development in heifers . Theriogenology. 1984;22:225–233. doi: 10.1016/0093-691x(84)90435-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Pinaffi FLV , Santos ES , Silva MG , Maturana Filho M , Madureira EH , Silva LA. Follicle and corpus luteum size and vascularity as predictors of fertility at the time of artificial insemination and embryo transfer in beef cattle . Pesq Vet Bras. 2015;35:470–476. [Google Scholar]
  33. Pugliesi G , Khan FA , Hannan MA , Beg MA , Carvalho GR , Ginther OJ. Inhibition of prostaglandin biosynthesis during postluteolysis and effects on CL regression, prolactin, and ovulation in heifers . Theriogenology. 2012;78:443–454. doi: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2012.02.024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Pugliesi G , Pinaffi FLV , Beg MA , Ginther OJ. Use of corpus luteum area as a predictor of ongoing functional luteolysis in dairy heifers . Reprod Fertil Dev. 2013;25:235. (Abstract) [Google Scholar]
  35. Pugliesi G , Miagawa BT , Paiva YN , França MR , Silva LA , Binelli M. Conceptus-induced changes in the gene expression of blood immune cells and the ultrasound-accessed luteal function in beef cattle: How early can we detect pregnancy? . Biol Reprod. 2014;95:1–12. doi: 10.1095/biolreprod.114.121525. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Pugliesi G , Santos FB , Lopes E , Nogueira É , Maio JR , Binelli M. Improved fertility in suckled beef cows ovulating large follicles or supplemented with long-acting progesterone after timed-AI . Theriogenology. 2016;85:1239–1248. doi: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2015.12.006. a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Pugliesi G , Silva JCB , Nishimura T , Miyai D , Silva LA , Binelli M. Use of Color-Doppler ultrasonography to improve selection of higher fertility beef recipiente cows for embryo transfer . Anim Reprod. 2016;13:454. b. (Abstract) [Google Scholar]
  38. Pugliesi G , Rezende RG , Silva JCB , Lopes E , Nishimura TK , Baruselli PS , Madureira EH , Binelli M. Uso da ultrassonografia Doppler em programas de IATF e TETF em bovinos . Rev Bras Reprod Anim. 2017;41:140–150. [Google Scholar]
  39. Quintela LA , Barrio M , Peña AI , Becerra JJ , Cainzos J , Herradón PG , Díaz C. Use of ultrasound in the reproductive management of dairy cattle . Reprod Domest Anim. 2012;47:34–44. doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0531.2012.02032.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Rocha CC , Cardoso BO , Binelli M , Pugliesi G. Correlations between plasma progesterone and ultrasonographic characteristics of thecorpus luteum in fixed-time inseminated Nelore cows . Anim Reprod. 2017;14:675. (Abstract) [Google Scholar]
  41. Scully S , Evans AC , Duffy P , Crowe MA. Characterization of follicle and CL development in beef heifers using high resolution three-dimensional ultrasonography . Theriogenology. 2014;81:407–418. doi: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2013.10.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Scully S , Evans AC , Carter F , Duffy P , Lonergan P , Crowe MA. Ultrasound monitoring of blood flow and echotexture of the corpus luteum and uterus during early pregnancy of beef heifers . Theriogenology. 2015;83:449–458. doi: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2014.10.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Shrestha HK , Pugliesi G , Beg MA , Ginther OJ. Role of luteinizing hormone in changes in concentrations of progesterone and luteal blood flow during the hours of a simulated pulse of 13,14-dihydro-15-keto-prostaglandin F(2alpha) (PGFM) in heifers . Biol Reprod. 2011;85:482–489. doi: 10.1095/biolreprod.111.092130. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Siddiqui MAR , Almamun M , Ginther OJ. Blood flow in the wall of the preovulatory follicle and its relationship to pregnancy establishment in heifers . Anim Reprod Sci. 2009;113:287–292. doi: 10.1016/j.anireprosci.2008.07.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Silva LA , Ginther OJ. Local effect of the conceptus on uterine vascular perfusion during early pregnancy in heifers . Reproduction. 2010;139:453–463. doi: 10.1530/REP-09-0363. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Siqueira LGB , Areas VS , Ghetti AM , Fonseca JF , Palhao MP , Fernandes CA , Viana JHM. Color Doppler flow imaging for the early detection of nonpregnant cattle at 20 days after timed artificial insemination . J Dairy Sci. 2013;96:6461–6472. doi: 10.3168/jds.2013-6814. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Szatmári V , Sótonyi P , Vörös K. Normal Duplex Doopler waveforms of major abdominal blood vessels in dogs: a Review . Vet Radiol Ultrasound. 2001;42:93–107. doi: 10.1111/j.1740-8261.2001.tb00911.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Utt MD , Johnson GL , Beal WE. The evaluation of corpus luteum blood flow using color-flow Doppler ultrasound for early pregnancy diagnosis in bovine embryo recipients . Theriogenology. 2009;71:707–715. doi: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2008.09.032. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Viana JHM , Arashiro EKN , Siqueira LGB , Ghetti AM , Areas VS , Guimarães CRB , Palhão MP , Camargo LSA , Fernandes CAC. Doppler ultrasonography as a tool for ovarian evaluation . Anim Reprod. 2013;10:215–222. [Google Scholar]
  50. Vieira LM , Sá Filho MF , Pugliesi G , Guerreiro BM , Cristaldo MA , Batista EOS , Freitas BG , Carvalho FJ , Guimarães LHC , Baruselli PS. Resynchronization in dairy cows 13 days after TAI followed by pregnancy diagnosis based on corpus luteum vascularization by color Doppler . Anim Reprod. 2014;11:378. (Abstract) [Google Scholar]

Articles from Animal Reproduction are provided here courtesy of Brazilian College of Animal Reproduction

RESOURCES