Bilateral thoracic disc herniation with abdominal wall paresis: a case report

Abstract

We present a rare case of a patient initially presenting with unilateral abdominal wall bulging and radicular pain caused by a lateral disc herniation at Th11/12, later suffering from a hernia recurrence with bilateral disc prolapse and motor deficits. The patient underwent sequesterectomy via a right hemilaminectomy at Th11, and after 8 weeks, a bilateral sequesterectomy with semirigid fusion Th11/12 was performed. Unilateral motor deficits at the thoracic level have been discussed in case reports; a bilateral disc protrusion with abdominal wall bulging occurring as a recurrent disc herniation has never been described before.

Background

While lumbar disc herniation present a very common pathology in patients between 30 and 50 years of age with an incidence of 5 to 20 cases per 1000 adults annually [6], thoracic disc herniation occurs more rarely [2, 16] and accounts for less than 4% of the surgeries performed [2].

Compared to cervical and lumbar disc protrusions, thoracic disc herniation seldom causes symptoms. The fraction of symptomatic disc prolapses in the thoracic spine amounts to only 0.1 to 3% of all spinal disc herniation [2].

Symptomatic thoracic disc herniation mainly causes signs of myelopathy (50 to 80%) [7, 8, 14], thoracic or abdominal radiculopathy and abdominal pain [1, 15], or, in rare cases, anterior spinal artery syndrome [17]. Motor deficits at the thoracic level with abdominal wall bulging due to a paresis of the musculus obliquus abdominis are currently only a matter of case reports, up now to only four cases, with unilateral disc prolapses that have been described in the literature [9, 12, 20, 25]. We hereby present a rare case of a patient initially presenting with unilateral abdominal pain and abdominal wall hernia, with complete neurophysiological assessment, intraoperative imaging, and postoperative outcome, who later developed a bilateral recurrent disc protrusion with bilateral radiculopathy and symmetrical abdominal wall bulging due to muscle paresis.

Case presentation

Case history

An 81-year-old patient presented with sudden onset bulging of his right abdominal wall (Fig. 1) and radicular pain projected to the Th11 dermatome. The colleagues of general and visceral surgery rejected the initially suspected diagnosis of an abdominal hernia. Sensibility was intact, and the patient did not suffer from any pain radiating into his legs. Past medical history included a stroke of the left middle cerebral artery (MCA) in 2015 and high blood pressure.

Fig. 1.

Initial presentation of the patient with abdominal wall bulging right-sided

Physical examination results

Except for the right abdominal wall bulging and radicular pain projecting on the Th11 nerve root, no focal neurological deficit could be detected. There were no clinical signs of myelopathy, no burdening back pain, no bladder or sphincter dysfunction, and no gait impairment. Reflexes were minimally prominent on the right side due to the history of a left stroke.

Imaging

At the initial presentation at the general and visceral surgical department, the patient underwent computer tomography (CT) of the abdomen. An abdominal wall hernia was excluded (Fig. 2). After neurological examination, an MRI of the thoracic and lumbar spine was performed, showing a large disc prolapse at the Th11/12 level on the right side affecting the right Th11 nerve root (Fig. 3).

Fig. 2.

The abdominal CT scan excludes the suspected diagnosis of an abdominal wall herniation

Fig. 3.

The MRI scan of the thoracolumbar spine T2 weighted axial and sagittal presents a right-sided disc herniation TH 11/12

Electrophysiology

Needle electromyography (EMG) of the right-sided Th11 paravertebral muscles 8 days after onset revealed fibrillations as a sign of florid denervation, indicating acute Th11 nerve root compression.

Surgical treatment

Due to the acute denervation and persistent pain symptoms, the disc herniation was removed 6 days after symptom onset through a Th11 hemilaminectomy on the right side with intraoperative X-ray control.

Outcome and second operation

The patient was discharged on the second postoperative day with moderate wound pain and complete resolving of the abdominal radicular pain. The abdominal wall bulging did not resolve.

After 8 weeks, the patient presented in the outpatient department with a new sudden onset of abdominal bulging occurring on the left side (symmetrical to the already existing right wall bulging: Fig. 4). The MRI revealed a recurrent disc prolapse at the operated Th11/12 level—now on both sides and accentuated on the right side—as well as a degeneration of the Th11/12 Modic type I disc, matching the clinical symptoms of the patient (Fig. 5). EMG of the left-sided Th11 paravertebral muscles 4 days after the onset of left abdominal wall paresis was normal, probably because of too early an examination.

Fig. 4.

In the clinical follow-up 8 weeks after the first operation, the patient presented with bilateral abdominal wall bulging

Fig. 5.

MRI of the thoracolumbar spine T2 weighted 8 weeks after initial presentation with clinical bilateral thoracic abdominal wall bulging and a bilateral relapse of disc herniation Th11/12

Due to the already performed hemilaminectomy on the right side and the symptoms of segmental instability, the patient was advised to have an operative treatment with discectomy and Th11/12 dynamic fusion with a semirigid (Cosmic MIA, Ulrich) instrumentation (Figs. 6 and 7). Back pain resolved after the operative treatment; the bilateral abdominal wall bulging remained stable (follow-up 5 months).

Fig. 6.

Intraoperative findings: A discectomy (a) and dynamic fusion (b) was performed

Fig. 7.

Postoperative X-ray in lateral (a) and anterior-posterior imaging (b)

Discussion and conclusions

Diagnostic pathway

Important differential diagnoses include thoracic diabetic radiculopathy [10], herpes zoster infection [18], abdominal malignancies, prior laparoscopic or minimally invasive surgeries [3, 22], and abdominal wall hernia and can lead to a swelling and bulging of the abdominal wall with radiating thoracic pain. These entities were considered and excluded via a paraspinal EMG and a CT scan. An MRI scan was performed leading to the diagnosis of thoracic disc herniation. In fact, patients may confound the abdominal pain with visceral pathologies, which is more common than disc prolapses causing the symptoms. The diagnostic pathway is indeed explainable, as symptomatic thoracic disc herniation is rare, accounting for only 0.25–0.57% of all disc herniation [24], and is more commonly above the level TH8 [24]. A further supplementary diagnostic method performed in this case was the EMG, showing signs of mono-segmental nerve root compression [11].

Initial surgical procedure

There are several possible surgical approaches to treat thoracic disc herniation, depending on localization, calcification of the herniated disc, and segmental instability. Posterolateral approaches are recommended for soft lateral disc herniation [8], and the transthoracic approach is more commonly used in large calcified central hernia [11]. Whether to stabilize or to perform a discectomy at all is currently a matter of debate [13, 21, 23]. Instrumented fusion can be required in cases performed from the posterior [11]. As our patient initially presented with an acute unilateral soft disc herniation without signs of segmental instability, we opted for a posterior approach with instrumentation.

Recurrent disc herniation

Less data is available on the recurrence rate of thoracic disc herniation. The general rate of recurrent disc herniation has been reported between 0.5–25%, especially in the first months after a successful first surgical procedure [5], but describes only recurrent disc herniation in the lumbar spine. Some of the common possible risk factors are obesity, smoking, male gender, diabetes, weightlifting, the size of the annular tear, and type of primary operation [5].

Surgical procedure after recurrent disc herniation

Currently, we lack guidelines with significant comparative studies for the surgical treatment of recurrent disc herniation. In a systematic review comparing possible treatments after recurrent lumbar disc herniation [5], excellent outcomes were described for re-discectomies, posterolateral fusion, and posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) without significant differences between the applied options.

Dower et al. found similar rates of satisfactory outcomes in patients undergoing discectomy alone versus discectomy with fusion (79.9% vs. 77.8%, respectively) but stated significant improvements in back pain scores in patients undergoing fusion compared with isolated discectomy (60.1% vs. 47.2%, respectively) [4]. Currently, many surgeons advocate for re-discectomy alone in cases without deformity, instability, or associated back pain and opt for instrumented fusion if one of the symptoms is present [19].

Patient outcome

The clinical outcome after disc or recurrent disc herniation is dependent on several factors, such as the time between first symptoms to surgical approach, size, and location of disc herniation, and preoperative clinical status. Most studies focus on the clinical outcome in myelopathic patients [8], and we currently lack sufficient data describing regeneration of thoracic motor deficits. In our case, the abdominal wall bulging did not resolve after surgical treatment.

Conclusion

The patient showed a clear benefit from the two operations regarding the radicular and back pain, which were distinctly better than the pain was preoperatively. The motor deficit with the bilateral abdominal wall bulging remained stable. To our knowledge, unilateral abdominal wall paresis due to thoracic disc herniation has only been reported in four case reports; a bilateral disc protrusion with symmetrical abdominal wall paresis has never been described before. We hereby present a unique and very rare case of motor deficits at the thoracic level without myelopathy, with diagnostic implications, surgical treatment, and clinical outcome.

Funding

Open Access funding enabled and organized by Projekt DEAL.

Compliance with ethical standards

Patients Consent

The patient has consented to the submission of the case report for submission to the journal.