Skip to main content
Scientific Reports logoLink to Scientific Reports
. 2021 Jun 14;11:12443. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-92021-5

On the permittivity of titanium dioxide

Julie Bonkerud 1, Christian Zimmermann 1, Philip Michael Weiser 1, Lasse Vines 1, Eduard V Monakhov 1,
PMCID: PMC8203734  PMID: 34127766

Abstract

Conductive rutile TiO2 has received considerable attention recently due to multiple applications. However, the permittivity in conductive, reduced or doped TiO2 appears to cause controversy with reported values in the range 100–10,000. In this work, we propose a method for measurements of the permittivity in conductive, n-type TiO2 that involves: (i) hydrogen ion-implantation to form a donor concentration peak at a known depth, and (ii) capacitance–voltage measurements for donor profiling. We cannot confirm the claims stating an extremely high permittivity of single crystalline TiO2. On the contrary, the permittivity of conductive, reduced single crystalline TiO2 is similar to that of insulating TiO2 established previously, with a Curie–Weiss type temperature dependence and the values in the range 160–240 along with the c-axis.

Subject terms: Electronic properties and materials, Materials for devices, Materials for energy and catalysis

Introduction

The static and low-frequency dielectric constant, ε, of rutile TiO2 has been surrounded with controversy since as early as 1952, when Nicolini1 reported an extremely high value of around 10,000 for the permittivity of ceramic rutile TiO2. Similar values of (1 − 3) × 104 were later observed by Parker and Wasilik2 for single crystalline rutile TiO2. It was immediately realized, however, that such high values may be a result of an incorrectly designed experiment or an incorrect interpretation. Indeed, the method used in Ref.2 is based on capacitance measurements over the full thickness of the crystal, where metallic contacts are deposited on opposite sides. Parker and Wasilik2 suggested that, in the case of non-negligible free carrier concentration, i.e., non-negligible effective net doping, Schottky contacts can be unintentionally formed (see Supplementary Material for a description of the Schottky contact). This is particularly relevant in the case of reduced TiO2, where oxygen vacancies give rise to n-type doping. In such samples, the total capacitance of the crystal is determined predominantly by the depletion region associated with the Schottky contact, or “by an electron-deficient barrier layer at the electrode-crystal interface such as has been proposed to explain the action of contact rectifiers” as formulated by Parker and Wasilik2 with a reference to the original work by Schottky3. Nowadays, Schottky rectifiers or Schottky diodes, as the modern accepted term, are widely used in semiconductor science and technology.

Based on these findings, Parker4,5 performed new theoretical and experimental studies of ε in rutile TiO2 crystals. Special care was taken to prepare highly resistive TiO2 by “heavy oxidation” as phrased in Ref.4. Highly resistive, oxygen-rich rutile TiO2 crystals were then investigated by measuring the capacitance between a parallel plate capacitor with the crystal inside. Permittivity of 170 and 86 were measured at 300 K along with the c- and a-axes, respectively. At 1.6 K, the permittivity along with the c- and a-axis were deduced to be 257 and 111, respectively. No frequency dependence was observed in the frequency range 102–3 × 106 Hz.

Later, Samara and Peercy6 measured pressure and temperature dependencies of ε. Similar to the previous investigations, ε was determined from capacitance measurements. No frequency dependence was assumed, based on the findings by Parker4, and the measurements were performed at 100 kHz. It has been shown that data can be fitted over the whole temperature range by the modified Curie–Weiss law derived first by Barrett7 for perovskite-type crystals:

ε=A0+C012T1cothT12T-T0, 1

where T is temperature, and A0, C0, T1 and T0 are fitting parameters. At 296 K, the permittivity along with the c- and a-axes was determined to be 166.7 and 89.8, respectively. As the temperature was decreased to 4 K, the permittivity increased to 251 along with the c-axis and to 114.9 along the a-axis. These values are close to those determined by Parker4.

Reports on extremely high ε of reduced single-crystalline rutile TiO2 continue to appear in the literature. For example, Chu8 has reported values in a range of 100 − 10,000. The permittivity was deduced from impedance measurements over the full crystal thickness, with gold contacts deposited on opposite sides of the sample. This concept is similar to that used in the earlier studies2. Recently, Li et al.9 reported a colossal dielectric permittivity in hydrogen-reduced rutile TiO2 crystals. Similar to earlier studies, ε was deduced from impedance measurements of the crystal with silver contacts. One can notice, however, that neither Chu8 nor Li et al.9 has considered formation of Schottky barriers at the metal-TiO2 interface and the corresponding depletion regions, which was considered by Parker and Wasilik2.

In this study, we intentionally form Schottky diodes on reduced single-crystalline rutile TiO2 and utilize their properties to deduce ε. The method involves: (i) hydrogen ion-implantation to form a donor concentration peak at a known depth, and (ii) capacitance–voltage measurements for donor profiling.

Results and discussion

Annealing of bulk TiO2 in reducing and hydrogen-rich atmosphere has long been known to result in conductive, n-type bulk material (see, for instance, Ref.10). Two main mechanisms are believed to be responsible: (i) formation of donors assigned to oxygen vacancies (VO) and titanium interstitials (Tii) in the reducing atmosphere11 and (ii) introduction of interstitial hydrogen (Hi) donors during hydrogenation12,13. Besides, Hi can interact with acceptors and passivate them, increasing the net n-type conductivity. We have demonstrated previously14,15 that annealing of single-crystalline TiO2 wafers in N2 at 1100–1200 °C or in forming gas (FG), 10%at. H2 and 90%at. N2, at 600 °C leads to increase in conductivity of the wafers. In the case of heat treatment in FG, the increase can be correlated with concentration of Hi. For annealing in N2, the increase in conductivity occurs without a corresponding increase in hydrogen concentration. These observations support the feasibility of the two mechanisms that involve VO/Tii and Hi. The effect of hydrogen-induced donors was also used to form a pronounced donor profile at a well-defined depth by ion implantation.

In the present study, single-crystalline rutile TiO2 wafers with a size of 5 × 5 mm2 and a conductivity of < 10−7−1 cm−1 were heat treated in forming gas (FG) at 600 °C for 90 min or in N2 at 1100 °C for 60 min. As a result of the heat treatments, the conductivity of the TiO2 samples has increased to 0.01–0.07 Ω−1 cm−1. Subsequently, Pd contacts with a diameter of around 400 μm were deposited. A stack of Ti/Al layers was deposited over the whole back side surface of the samples as the back side contact. Current–voltage (I–V) measurements reveal a rectification of up to eight orders of magnitude, indicating that Pd Schottky diodes are formed. The I–V measurements show that at the reverse bias conditions the dc impedance of the Pd Schottky contact dominates over the bulk dc impedance of the samples. It should also be emphasized that the size of the Pd contacts is significantly less than the sample size. Further measurements are performed at the reverse bias, when the impedance associated with the Schottky barrier and the depletion region is dominant.

Capacitance–voltage (CV) measurements are a well-established technique for probing the depth distribution of donors and acceptors. Figure 1 depicts CV measurements at different temperatures (Tmeas) for a sample annealed in N2 at 1100 °C for 60 min (TiO2–N2). The CV measurement performed prior to H+ implantation is shown with red, dotted curve (Fig. 1a). The measurement is carried out at 300 K and shows decreasing capacitance with increasing reverse bias, in accordance with the expected dependence for a Schottky diode (see Supplementary Material). Blue, solid curves represent measurements recorded after the sample was implanted with 200-keV H+ to a dose of 3 × 1013 cm−2. The different blue curves represent measurements recorded at different Tmeas. Figure 1a shows that capacitance of the Schottky diode decreases with increasing reverse voltage, V, as expected for a diode.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Capacitance (a) of a TiO2-N2 sample (probing frequency 60 kHz) and the N(V0ε product (b) as functions of applied voltage. The red, dotted curve shows the as-prepared sample, i.e., after the N2 heat treatment but prior to H+ implantation. The blue, solid curves are for the H-implanted sample measured at different temperatures (Tmeas). The peaks in N(V0ε are indicated by the drop-down lines. The corresponding capacitance values, obtained at the same applied voltages, are also marked in (a).

Within the depletion approximation (see Ref.16 or Supplementary Material), one can derive the following expression:

N(V)ε0ε=C3qA2dCdV-1, 2

where N(V) is the doping concentration at the depth of the depletion region for a given V, ε0 is the vacuum permittivity, ε is the relative permittivity, C is the capacitance at the given V, q is the electron charge and A is the area of the diode. Since ε0 and ε do not depend on V, the product N(V0ε will maintain the shape of N(V).

Figure 1b displays N(V0ε as a function of V. For the as-prepared sample prior to H+ implantation, the data reveal a somewhat non-uniform, but monotonous N(V0ε as a function of V. Hydrogen implantation leads to formation of a pronounced peak in N(V0ε. One can thus identify the voltages at which the edge of the depletion region reaches the peak of N(V0ε, as indicated in Fig. 1b with filled circles. For example:

  • For Tmeas = 100 K, the depletion region edge reaches the donor concentration peak at Vpeak=−3.8 V (Fig. 1b). This voltage corresponds to the capacitance Cpeak= 160 pF, indicated in Fig. 1a.

  • For Tmeas = 250 K, the depletion region edge reaches the donor concentration peak at Vpeak=−6.2 V (Fig. 1b). This voltage corresponds to the capacitance Cpeak= 131 pF, indicated in Fig. 1a.

On the other hand, the depth of the implantation peak for hydrogen-induced donors is known from secondary ion mass spectrometry (SIMS) measurements: dpeak = 0.97 µm (see Supplementary Material).

Within the depletion approximation, the capacitance, C, and the depletion depth, d, are related as C = ε0εA/d. One can thus find ε from:

ε=Cpeakdpeakε0A. 3

The results of the analysis from Fig. 1 and Eq. (3) are summarized in Table 1. No frequency dependence has been observed within the range between 1 kHz and 1 MHz (see Supplementary Material).

Table 1.

Data used for analysis of temperature dependence of ε for the TiO2-N2 sample with CV data plotted in Fig. 1. The implantation depth dpeak = 0.97 µm. The diode area A = 8.3 × 10–4 cm2.

Temperature, K Vpeak, V Cpeak, pF ε
100  − 3.8 160 211
150  − 4.6 151 199
200  − 5.6 140 185
250  − 6.2 131 173

It should be noted, however, that in some cases we could not perform this analysis at the given experimental conditions. The method relies on the implanted hydrogen profile being well within the depletion region of the Schottky diode. This requires a careful choice of the implantation energy, in order to provide a suitable implantation depth. However, the depletion region depends on (i) the concentration of ionized donors, (ii) the Fermi level in the material, and (iii) the permittivity. Since all these factors can change with temperature, a given implantation depth may not be suitable for all temperatures. In addition, in order to reliably resolve the implanted peak, the concentration of implanted hydrogen donors should significantly exceed the background donor concentration. At the same time, the concentration of the implanted hydrogen cannot be too high, in order to avoid a strong effect on the depletion region depth and/or to prevent phase transformations. One of the examples is illustrated in Fig. 1b, where the curve for Tmeas = 300 K does not reveal a well-defined donor concentration peak. In this particular case, two effects are believed to occur: (i) the concentration of the background ionized donors appears to be comparable to the concentration of the implanted donors, and (ii) the implanted donor peak is too close to the maximum depletion depth. However, at lower temperatures, Tmeas ≤ 250 K, the apparent concentration of ionized background donors decreases, and the implantation peak becomes more prominent.

The analysis described by Fig. 1 and Eqs. (2) and (3) has been applied for more detailed studies of ε in a number of samples annealed in FG (TiO2-FG) and the TiO2–N2 samples. Figure 2 demonstrates that ε determined in the present study is very close to that determined for insulating, oxygen-rich rutile TiO2 by Samara and Peercy6. For reduced TiO2, ε along with the c-axis is in the range 160 − 240 for temperatures 50–300 K. It decreases as temperature increases and can be described by the modified Curie–Weiss law. We do not observe a significant difference in ε between reduced TiO2 (annealed in N2 at 1100 °C) and reduced-hydrogenated TiO2 (annealed in FG at 600 °C).

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Temperature dependence of the c-axis permittivity (ε) of conductive, n-type TiO2 obtained after heat treatments in FG and N2; and a modified Curie–Weiss dependence with the parameters determined by Samara and Peercy6 (solid curve).

Conclusion

In conclusion, measurements of the permittivity, ε, in conductive single-crystalline TiO2 are challenging and causing controversy. We propose a method for deducing ε from capacitance measurements. The method involves formation of Schottky barrier diodes and hydrogen implantation. The implantation results in a well-pronounced donor concentration profile, corresponding to the implanted hydrogen profile. The donor profile is then characterized using capacitance–voltage measurements, and ε can be deduced. We observe that ε of reduced, conductive rutile TiO2 is similar to that of oxygen-rich, insulating rutile TiO2 established previously. We cannot confirm claims of colossal dielectric permittivity in hydrogenated and reduced rutile single-crystalline TiO2.

The Research Council of Norway is acknowledged for the support to the Norwegian Micro- and Nano-Fabrication Facility, NorFab, project number 295864. Financial support by the Research Council of Norway via the EEA-JRPRO-NO-2013-1 European Project (PERPHECT), the Research Center for Sustainable Solar Cell Technology (FME SUSOLTECH, project number 257639), and the Norwegian PhD Network on Nanotechnology for Microsystems (project number 221860/F60), is gratefully acknowledged. Financial support by the Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences at the University of Oslo via the strategic research initiative FOXHOUND is gratefully acknowledged.

Methods

A. Samples

The study was performed on Verneuil-grown rutile TiO2 single crystals with a surface orientation of (001), purchased from Shinkosha Co., Ltd.17. As-received crystals were 0.5 mm thick with double-side polished surfaces, nominally undoped, transparent, and semi-insulating with a conductivity of σ < 10−7−1 cm−1. Conductive n-type TiO2 samples of bluish colour were obtained by heat treatments in forming gas (FG) flow (N2 + H2 with [H2]/[N2] ≈ 1/9) at 600 °C for 90 min (hydrogenating and reducing heat treatment) or in N2 flow at 1100 °C for 60 min (reducing heat treatment). The heat treatments resulted in increased conductivity of the samples in the range 0.01–0.07 Ω−1 cm−1. Subsequently, circular 150-nm thick Pd contacts with a diameter of around 400 μm were deposited through a shadow mask. A back side contact was made by depositing a stack of Ti/Al layers over the whole back side surface of the wafer: (1) a 10-nm Ti-layer on TiO2 and (2) a 150-nm Al-layer on Ti. This resulted in Schottky diodes with a rectification of up to eight orders of magnitude18. After initial electrical measurements, the samples were implanted at room temperature with 200-keV H+ ions to different doses in the range 6 × 1012—3 × 1014 cm−2.

B. Experimental set-up

Secondary ion mass spectrometry (SIMS) measurements were performed using a Cameca IMS 7f spectrometer with a primary beam of 15-keV Cs+ ions. A constant erosion rate was assumed for depth-calibration, where the crater depths were measured using a DekTak Stylus Profilometer.

After the electrical measurements, each Schottky diode was measured by the profilometer for accurate determination of the diode area.

Capacitance–Voltage (CV) measurements were carried out under dark conditions at temperatures in the range between 20 and 300 K using an Agilent 4284A LCR Meter at six different probing frequencies between 1 kHz and 1 MHz and with a probing AC amplitude of 30 mV. The LCR-meter was used in two modes: (1) so-called parallel mode (CpGp) and (2) so-called series mode (CsRs).

Supplementary Information

Author contributions

E.V.M, L.V., J.B and C.Z. have planned the experiment. J.B., C.Z. and P.W. performed experimental measurements. J.B. wrote the main body of the text. All the authors have contributed to writing the manuscript. All the authors reviewed the manuscript.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Footnotes

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1038/s41598-021-92021-5.

References

  • 1.Nicolini L. A new dielectric material. Nature. 1952;170:938. doi: 10.1038/170938a0. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Parker RA, Wasilik JH. Dielectric constant and dielectric loss of TiO2 (rutile) at low frequencies. Phys. Rev. 1960;120:1631. doi: 10.1103/PhysRev.120.1631. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Schottky W. Vereinfachte und erweiterte Theorie der Randschicht-gleichrichter. Z. Physik. 1942;118:539. doi: 10.1007/BF01329843. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Parker RA. Static dielectric constant of rutile (TiO2), 1.6-1060 K. Phys. Rev. 1961;124:1719. doi: 10.1103/PhysRev.124.1719. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Parker RA. Lorentz corrections in rutile. Phys. Rev. 1961;124:1713. doi: 10.1103/PhysRev.124.1713. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Samara G, Peercy P. Pressure and temperature dependences of the Raman-active phonons in SnO2. Phys. Rev. B. 1973;7:1131. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.7.1131. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Barrett JH. Dielectric constant in perovskite type crystals. Phys. Rev. 1952;86:118. doi: 10.1103/PhysRev.86.118. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Chu C. New ordered phases of slightly reduced rutile and their sharp dielectric absorptions at low temperature. Phys. Rev. B. 1970;1:4700. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.1.4700. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Li J, Li F, Zhu X, Lin D, Li Q, Liu W, Xu Z. Colossal dielectric permittivity in hydrogen-reduced rutile TiO2 crystals. J. Alloys Compds. 2017;692:375. doi: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2016.09.044. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Becker JH, Hosler WR. Multiple-band conduction in n-type rutile (TiO2) Phys. Rev. 1965;137:A1872. doi: 10.1103/PhysRev.137.A1872. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Deák P, Aradi B, Frauenheim T. Oxygen deficiency in TiO2: Similarities and differences between the Ti self-interstitial and the O vacancy in bulk rutile and anatase. Phys. Rev. B. 2015;92:045204. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.92.045204. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Brant AT, Yang S, Giles NC, Halliburton LE. Hydrogen donors and Ti3+ ions in reduced TiO2 crystals. J. Appl. Phys. 2011;110:053714. doi: 10.1063/1.3630964. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Herklotz F, Lavrov EV, Weber J. Infrared absorption of the hydrogen donor in rutile TiO2. Phys. Rev. B. 2011;83:235202. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.83.235202. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Zimmermann C, Bonkerud J, Herklotz F, Sky TN, Hupfer A, Monakhov E, Svensson BG, Vines L. Influence of annealing atmosphere on formation of electrically-active defects in rutile TiO2. J. Appl. Phys. 2018;123:161572. doi: 10.1063/1.5011136. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Weiser PM, Zimmermann C, Bonkerud J, Vines L, Monakhov EV. Donors and polaronic absorption in rutile TiO2 single crystals. J. Appl. Phys. 2020;128:145701. doi: 10.1063/5.0027434. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Blood, P., Orton, J. W. The Electrical Characterization of Semiconductors: Majority Carriers and Electron States (Academic Press, 1992).
  • 17.Verneuil-Grown r-TiO2 from Shinkosha. https://www.shinkosha.com/english/sehin/2_03.html. Accessed 05 Dec 2019.
  • 18.Bonkerud J, Zimmermann C, Herklotz F, Weiser PM, Aarholt T, Verhoeven EF, Vines L, Monakhov EV. Fabrication and characterization of Schottky barrier diodes on rutile TiO2. Mater. Res. Exp. 2020;7:065903. doi: 10.1088/2053-1591/ab9777. [DOI] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials


Articles from Scientific Reports are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES