Abstract
Recent experimental evidence suggests that the FeMoco of nitrogenase undergoes structural rearrangement during N2 reduction, which may result in the generation of coordinatively unsaturated iron sites with two sulfur donors and a carbon donor. In an effort to synthesize and study small-molecule model complexes with a one-carbon/two-sulfur coordination environment, we have designed two new SCS pincer ligands containing a central NHC donor accompanied by thioether- or thiolate-functionalized aryl groups. Metallation of the thioether ligand with Fe(OTf)2 gives 6-coordinate complexes in which the SCS ligand binds meridionally. In contrast, metallation of the thiolate ligand with Fe(HMDS)2 gives a four-coordinate pseudotetrahedral amide complex in which the ligand binds facially, illustrating the potential structural flexibility of these ligands. Reaction of the amide complex with a bulky monothiol gives a four-coordinate complex with a one-carbon/three-sulfur coordination environment that resembles the resting state of nitrogenase, and reaction with phenylhydrazine gives a product with a rare κ1-bound phenylhydrazido group which undergoes N-N cleavage to give a phenylamido complex.
Graphical Abstract

Synopsis:
Two new pincer ligands with N-heterocyclic carbene anchors and S-containing arms form iron complexes which incorporate nitrogenase-relevant donors.
Introduction
Nitrogenases, which convert N2 to bioavailable NH3, play a vital role in the global nitrogen cycle.1 In Mo-nitrogenase, this reaction occurs at the unusual iron-molybdenum cofactor (FeMoco), which in its resting state contains six sulfide-bridged iron atoms arranged around a central carbide atom.2-5 In order to bind N2 the FeMoco must undergo further reduction, which is potentially accompanied by changes in the coordination environment at the iron site(s).6-8 In particular, crystallographic studies have revealed that in nitrogenases, the central “belt” sulfides can be replaced by exogenous ligands during substrate reduction.9-12 The ability to lose a sulfide implies that prior to N2 binding, the FeMoco may contain one or more coordinatively unsaturated iron atoms with two S donors and a C donor (Chart 1, top).
Chart 1.
The unusual coordination environment and reactivity of the Fe atoms in the FeMoco has stimulated the development of inorganic model complexes that capture features in common with the potential intermediates.13 While many earlier studies had abiological donor atoms and/or metals,14-15 there has been significant recent progress towards iron complexes with S- and C-containing ligands that more closely mimic the coordination environment in nitrogenase.16-21 For example, we reported iron complexes of a m-terphenyl-derived bis(thiolate) ligand (Chart 1) in which the sulfur donors are accompanied by a central arene ring that acts as a carbon donor through the π-system of the central arene.22-23 Iron complexes with this ligand bind N2 upon reduction, giving the first example of an Fe-N2 complex containing only biomimetic S and C donors. However, the π-acceptor character of the central arene competes with π-backbonding to N2, leading to weak N2 binding. Furthermore, the SCS ligand dissociates in the presence of excess acid, causing decomposition and preventing catalytic N2 reduction. We reasoned that incorporation of a C-based σ-donor in place of the arene ring might lead to more stable complexes that are more electron-rich and therefore suitable for substrate binding.
Although they are not as common as pincers containing N, C, and P donors, some SCS pincer ligands have been reported in the literature.24-25 We sought an SCS pincer with both anionic S donors and a strongly-bound C anchor, which led us to the design of N-heterocyclic carbene (NHC) systems. Iron-NHC complexes are employed in a variety of catalytic reactions.26-28 They have been used in iron-sulfur clusters, where they have been shown to support low oxidation states29 and stabilize alkyl complexes.30-32 Chelating bis(NHC) ligands can also support iron-thiolate and iron-selenolate complexes.33-34 Other iron complexes of multidentate NHC ligands are able to coordinate N2.35-43 Peters has described a carbene complex of iron that can reduce N2 to ammonia.44
NHC ligands can be modified by changing the substituents attached to the aryl groups, allowing facile introduction of additional donor atoms.45-49 Although several NHC ligands containing accessory S-donors have been reported, the majority have only one sulfur donor and their syntheses cannot be easily modified to incorporate a second sulfur donor.50-51 One notable exception is a set of nickel, platinum, and palladium complexes with a bis(thiolate) NHC ligand reported by Sellmann and co-workers (Chart 1).52-54 However, in this system the free ligand was not cleanly isolated or fully characterized due to its poor solubility in common organic solvents. We reasoned that the introduction of bulky organic substituents on the aryl groups of the ligand would facilitate isolation and purification of both the ligand and corresponding metal complexes.
Here, we report the synthesis of two novel SCS pincer ligands containing a central NHC and two thioether or thiolate ligands (Chart 1), which may also find broader use in coordination chemistry. We demonstrate that in iron complexes, the ligand binds in a planar fashion with [SMeCSMe], whereas it binds facially with [SCS]2−, showing the geometric flexibility of this ligand type. In addition, the facial SCS coordination resembles the proposed coordination environment of the iron atoms in FeMoco after dissociation of a sulfide. Both the flexibility and preference for facial coordination are conducive to mimicking the environment of iron in the FeMoco. We also report our unsuccessful attempts to use these complexes as pre-catalysts for N2 reduction. Finally, we describe tetrahedral iron complexes containing [SCS]2− with nitrogenase-relevant thiolate, phenylhydrazido, and amido groups.
Results and Discussion
Synthesis of bis(thiolate) and bis(thioether) imidazolium salts.
We selected an NHC ligand with tert-butyl substituted aryl thiolate groups. The initial synthetic steps were adapted from procedures reported by Sellmann.55 In the original report, 3,5-di-tert-butylaniline (1) was synthesized using a Schmidt reaction, but we wanted to avoid large-scale reactions with sodium azide. Therefore, we instead prepared 1 from commercially available 3,5-di-tert-butylbromobenzene via Buchwald–Hartwig amination with lithium bis(trimethylsilyl)amide followed by aqueous hydrolysis of the resulting silylated aniline.56 Following literature procedures,55 1 was converted to 2-aminobenzothiazole 2 and ring-opened to give 2-aminothiophenol 3. Crude 3 was then treated with glyoxal in order to generate a Schiff base, which is known to rearrange to give 4.55 Upon deprotonation with strong base, 4 rearranges to the bis(thiolate) Schiff base,55 allowing the net functionalization of the thiolate groups with electrophiles. Using this strategy, deprotonation of 4 with KHMDS at −78 °C followed by addition of methyl iodide afforded S-protected Schiff base 5a in 90% yield. Our initial attempts to convert 5a to an imidazolium salt using paraformaldehyde and HCl following the general procedures used for preparation of common unsaturated NHC ligands57 afforded only trace amounts of 6a. We hypothesized that acid-induced decomposition of 5a occurs more rapidly than reaction with the heterogeneous paraformaldehyde. Accordingly, sonication of the paraformaldehyde pellets with HCl in dioxane to produce a fine suspension prior to addition to 5a resulted in a significant increase in yield. Compound 6a was isolated in 35% yield by triturating the crude product with pentane, followed by counterion metathesis to the tosylate salt, which precipitated from dichloromethane solution upon addition of diethyl ether.
Since methyl protecting groups are often difficult to remove, we also prepared the analogous benzyl-protected imine 5b in 72% yield by treating 4 with KHMDS and benzyl bromide at −78 °C. Cyclization with paraformaldehyde using a modified version of the procedure used for preparation of 6a gave the imidazolium salt 6b in 36% yield. The benzyl protecting group was then removed by addition of excess (> 3 equiv) potassium naphthalenide at −78 °C in THF followed by quenching with methanol. The potassium bis(thiolate) imidazolium salt 7 was isolated in 64% yield after workup.
We also attempted to isolate the corresponding bis(thiol) imidazolium salt by quenching the deprotection with an ethereal HCl solution instead of with methanol. The 1H NMR spectrum of an aliquot of this reaction mixture in CD2Cl2 indicated complete consumption of the starting material and formation of a symmetric major species with tert-butyl resonances at δ 1.36 and 1.59 ppm that are assigned to the desired bis(thiol) imidazolium salt (Figure S11). Stirring the solution overnight resulted in degradation of this species to a lower-symmetry product with tert-butyl resonances at δ 0.80, 1.20, 1.42, and 1.45 ppm. Two doublets (3JH-H = 13 Hz) also appear at δ 4.87 and 5.63 ppm, consistent with formation of an olefin-containing product. These results suggest rearrangement to a benzothiazolium-aminothiol species (Scheme 2) with unknown stereochemistry. This reaction occurred slowly even in the solid state, and was also observed when isolated 7 was treated with HCl in THF (Figure S12). Due to this instability, we were unable to cleanly isolate the fully protonated bis(thiol) imidazolium form of 7, though the bis(thiolate) imidazolium form was useful in synthesis, as described below. Analogous reactivity was observed by Despagnet-Ayoub et al. during attempts to synthesize an aniline-NHC-phenol ligand, which suggests that facile rearrangement may be a general property of N-aryl imidazolium salts containing protic functional groups.58-59
Scheme 2.

Proposed rearrangement of Bis(thiol) Imidazolium Salt Under Acidic Conditions
Synthesis of Bis(Thioether) NHC Iron Complexes.
Treatment of 6a with KHMDS in THF resulted in formation of the free N-heterocyclic carbene SMeCSMe, as demonstrated by the disappearance of the imidazolium proton at δ 9.35 ppm in the starting material and appearance of a characteristic 13C resonance for the carbene carbon at δ 218 ppm (Figure S10). SMeCSMe was separated from the salt byproduct by extraction into diethyl ether, and isolated in 92% yield. This material is stable for months when stored in the solid state at −35 °C under N2.
Slow addition of SMeCSMe to a solution of Fe(OTf)2 in THF at −78 °C followed by warming to room temperature gave a colorless iron complex (8). Layering a concentrated THF solution of 8 with pentane and storing at −40 °C resulted in precipitation of a white solid. Despite multiple attempts, we were unable to obtain high-quality crystallographic data for 8, presumably due to its complex speciation in THF (see below). In a low-resolution crystal structure (R = 12.5%), the ligand is bound meridionally with a molecule of THF trans to the NHC, and the two trifluoromethanesulfonate ligands are bound in the remaining sites (Figure S52). The Mössbauer spectrum of material isolated in this fashion indicates a single iron-containing species with δ = 1.10 mm/s and ∣ΔEQ∣ = 3.74 mm/s (Figure 1, top), which is typical for an octahedral high-spin iron(II) complex with low symmetry.
Figure 1.
(Top) Mössbauer spectrum of solid 8 isolated by precipitation from THF with pentane. (Middle) Mössbauer spectrum of 50 mM 8 in frozen THF. (Bottom) Mössbauer spectrum of 9 in the solid state. The data are shown as circles, the lines correspond to fits with the parameters in Table 1, and the grey line is the residual.
The 1H NMR spectrum of 8 in THF-d8 contains multiple paramagnetically shifted resonances between δ −1 and 106 ppm (Figure S15). Based on the relative integrations of the NMR signals, we estimate that two species containing the SMeCSMe ligand are present in solution in a ratio of ca. 3:1 (see Supplementary Information for a detailed discussion of the assignment of the 1H NMR spectrum of 8). The 19F NMR spectrum of 8 contains a peak at δ −7.8 ppm (v1/2 = 220 Hz) and a much broader peak at δ −33 ppm (v1/2 = 2100 Hz) also in a ratio of ca. 3:1 (Figure S16), indicating the presence of triflate ions in two different coordination environments, presumably corresponding to the same two species observed in the 1H NMR spectrum. The Mössbauer spectra of 8 in frozen THF (Figure 1, middle) and of a THF solution of 8 dried under vacuum (Figure S17) also indicate the presence of two species. One species has parameters nearly identical to those of the precipitated 8 described above (δ = 1.07 mm/s and ∣ΔEQ∣ = 3.74 mm/s) and likely corresponds to the crystallographically determined structure. The second species has a broader spectrum with nearly the same isomer shift (δ = 1.11 mm/s) but a smaller quadrupole splitting (∣ΔEQ∣ = 2.16 mm/s). The ratio of the two species in the Mössbauer spectra is nearly 1:1. The difference of this ratio from that observed by 1H NMR spectroscopy may arise from shifts in speciation with concentration and/or freezing. The identity of the other species in the solution spectra of 8 is unknown, but could correspond to a different ligand binding mode (for example, fac vs. mer binding, or dissociation of one or both thioether groups).
We were unable to fully purify 8 due to its poor solubility in common non-coordinating organic solvents and its similar solubility to free Fe(OTf)2 and protonated ligand, which are consistently present as minor impurities in the isolated material. We therefore explored the behavior of 8 in a more strongly coordinating solvent. Upon dissolving 8 in CH3CN, an immediate color change from white to intense pink occurred. The 1H NMR spectrum of the resulting species in CD3CN indicates formation of a diamagnetic acetonitrile adduct (9) and the 19F NMR contains a single sharp resonance at δ −80 ppm. The Mössbauer spectrum of 9 (Figure 1) contains a single quadrupole doublet with δ = 0.38 mm/s, which is significantly lower than that of 8 (see above) and is characteristic of a low-spin electronic configuration at iron(II). The CH3CN binding is reversible; upon dissolving pink crystals of 9 in THF, a colorless solution is obtained and the 1H NMR spectrum of the resulting material in THF-d8 is identical to that of 8. Crystals of 9 suitable for XRD were grown by layering a concentrated CH3CN solution with diethyl ether at −40 °C. In this structure (Figure 2), the iron is six-coordinate and SMeCSMe is bound meridionally. The three remaining open coordination sites are occupied by CH3CN molecules and the triflate counterions are outer-sphere.
Figure 2.
(Top): Thermal-ellipsoid plot of the XRD structure of 9 with thermal ellipsoids shown at the 50% probability level. Hydrogen atoms, the outer-sphere triflate counterions, and outer-sphere solvent molecules (CH3CN and diethyl ether) have been omitted. Selected bond distances (Å): Fe1-S12: 2.2629(8); Fe1-S13: 2.2731(9); Fe1-C11: 1.884(2). (Bottom): View of 9 along the Fe-C bond with CH3CN omitted, to show the conformation of SMeCSMe.
We attempted catalytic N2 reduction by treating 8 (generated via co-evaporation of 9 with THF) with 6 equiv of KC8 and 12 equiv of acid ([H(OEt2)2][BArF4], BHT, diphenylammonium triflate, lutidine hydrochloride, H2O, or HCl) at −78 °C in THF. These reactions generated little or no NH3 and/or N2H4 (Scheme S1, Supporting Information). Due to the inability of 8 to catalyze N2 reduction and the unclear nature of its solution speciation, we turned our attention to iron complexes of the bis(thiolate) NHC SCS2−.
Synthesis of Bis(Thiolate) NHC Iron Complexes.
Treatment of 7 with KHMDS in THF resulted in clean formation of the bis(thiolate)-carbene ligand SCS2−, as indicated by the loss of the imidazolium signal at δ 9.35 ppm in the 1H NMR spectrum and appearance of a resonance at δ 214 ppm in the 13C NMR spectrum (Figures S13-S14). Addition of this in situ-generated NHC to FeCl2, FeBr2, or Fe(OTf)2 in THF at −80 °C gave bright red solutions. However, upon warming to room temperature, these reaction mixtures turned black and a dark precipitate formed. Although we have not been able to structurally characterize the product(s), we suspect that a mixture of oligomeric species is formed. Dimerization is common for iron complexes with thiolate-containing ligands and, in particular, has been observed for ligands derived from the o-aminothiophenol 3.60-62 The formation of polymeric species has also been reported for some iron complexes with a benzimidazole OCO ligand related to SCS2−.63
In contrast, addition of 7 to Fe(HMDS)2 in THF followed by addition of 18-crown-6 formed a bright yellow species (10) that is stable in solution at room temperature in the absence of air. Crystals of 10 suitable for X-ray diffraction were obtained from a concentrated diethyl ether solution stored at −40 °C overnight. XRD analysis reveals a complex in which iron is coordinated to SCS2− and a bis(trimethylsilyl)amide ligand with a distorted tetrahedral geometry (τ4 = 0.79) at iron (Figure 3).64 The ligand is bound facially, which results in the iron lying 1.18 Å below the plane defined by the donor atoms of the SCS ligand. This contrasts with 8, 9, and the nickel dimer reported by Sellmann and co-workers52, in which the metal ion sits in the SCS plane and the flanking aryl groups twist to accommodate a planar binding (see Figure 2). Structurally analogous bis(phenolate) NHC ligands are also known to bind in both fac and mer geometries in molybdenum complexes, illustrating the conformational flexibility of this type of X(NHC)X ligand scaffold.65
Figure 3.
(Top) Thermal-ellipsoid plot of the XRD structure of 10 with thermal ellipsoids shown at the 50% probability level. One of two chemically identical but crystallographically inequivalent molecules in the asymmetric unit is shown. Hydrogen atoms, K(18-crown-6), and outer-sphere solvent molecules (diethyl ether) are omitted. Selected bond distances (A): Fe1-S12: 2.378(2) Fe1-S13: 2.345(2) Fe1-C11: 2.062(6) Fe1-N14: 1.984(5) (Bottom) View of 10 along the Fe-C bond to illustrate the conformation of SCS2−. Note that the Fe does not lie in the plane of the imidazolium ring. The bis(trimethylsilyl)amide ligand is omitted for clarity.
The 1H NMR spectrum of 10 in C6D6 contains six broad, paramagnetically shifted resonances between +78 and −13 ppm, suggesting that the crystallographically observed Cs symmetry is retained in solution. The solution magnetic moment of μeff = 5.1 ± 0.1 is consistent with a high-spin (S = 2) configuration at iron(II). The solid-state Mössbauer spectrum of 10 (Figure S26) features a quadrupole doublet with δ = 0.67 mm/s and ∣ΔEQ∣ = 1.82 mm/s which is also consistent with high-spin iron(II) in a tetrahedral geometry. The Mössbauer spectra of 10 in the solid state and in a frozen THF solution are nearly identical (Figure S27), implying that the coordination mode observed in the solid-state structure is retained in coordinating solvents.
In order to create a vacant coordination site through loss of silylamine, 10 was treated with 1 equiv of [H(OEt2)2][BArF4] in THF at −78 °C, which resulted in immediate color change from yellow to dark red. The Mössbauer spectrum of a frozen aliquot of this solution indicates the presence of at least three iron-containing species (Figure S47). The same behavior was observed in an analogous experiment with the weaker acid [HNEt3][BF4] (Figure S48). Furthermore, the Mössbauer spectra of reaction mixtures generated under N2 and Ar are identical (Figure S47), indicating that the complexity of the reaction mixture is not caused by partial N2 binding. Upon warming these reaction mixtures to room temperature, a slow color change to black occurred and Mössbauer spectra indicate the presence of at least two iron species different from those present in aliquots that were frozen before warming. As discussed above, the same behavior was observed during our attempts to metallate the free carbene SCS2− to iron(II) salts, and may arise from oligomerization of transiently-formed three-coordinate iron complexes.
Treatment of 10 with 5 equiv of [H(OEt2)2][BArF4] at −80 °C resulted in immediate formation of a light orange solution and precipitation of a white solid. The Mössbauer spectrum of this crude reaction mixture (Figure S49) indicates a complex mixture of products, suggesting decomposition of the complex (perhaps via ligand protonation). Reduction with a mixture of stoichiometric KC8 and [H(OEt2)2][BArF4] also led to the formation of multiple species (Figure S50). Our attempts to use 10 as a pre-catalyst for N2 reduction in the presence of excess (55 equiv) KC8 and a variety of acids ([H(OEt2)2][BArF4], diphenylammonium triflate, H2O, and BHT) resulted in release of only one equivalent of NH3, presumably formed via hydrolysis of the bis(trimethylsilyl)amide ligand in 10 (Scheme S2, Supporting Information).
Generation of SCS-Supported Iron Complexes of Nitrogenase-Relevant Ligands.
By protonating the amide in 10 with weaker acids, we were able to isolate complexes of their conjugate bases. Treatment of 10 with a bulky m-terphenyl monothiol (Scheme 5) gave tris(thiolate) iron(II) complex 11, which has an S3C coordination environment. The crystallographic structure of this complex (Figure 4) features a distorted (τ4 = 0.66) tetrahedral geometry in a coordination environment that resembles the individual iron sites in the resting state of nitrogenase. Compared to a similar complex with an m-terphenyl-derived bis(thiolate) ligand (Chart 1)22, 11 exhibits similar Fe-S bond lengths of ~2.3 Å. However, in the m-terphenyl analogue, the shortest Fe-C(arene) distance was 2.484(7) Å indicating little or no Fe-C interaction in the iron(II) state. In contrast, the Fe-C bond length in 11 is 2.035(2) Å which is similar to the 2.0 Å Fe-carbide bond lengths in the resting state of the nitrogenase FeMoco.9
Scheme 5.

Figure 4.
Thermal-ellipsoid plot of the XRD structure of 11 with thermal ellipsoids shown at the 50% probability level. Hydrogen atoms and K(18-crown-6) are omitted. Selected bond distances (A): Fe1-S12: 2.3258(9), Fe-S13: 2.3396(9), Fe1-C11: 2.035(2), Fe1-S14: 2.2940(8)
In the crystal structure of 11, the monothiolate ligand is bound asymmetrically with one mesityl ring lying below the iron center. However, spectroscopic studies suggest that the solid-state geometry is not fully preserved in solution. First, in the 1H NMR spectrum of 11 in THF-d8 at 25 °C, the peaks for the monothiolate ligand are broadened beyond detection with the exception of a sharp singlet at δ −24 ppm that integrates to 1H. This singlet is assigned to the proton para to the sulfur of the monothiolate, which is the only proton that is not exchanged by rotation of the monothiolate about the S─C bond. Upon cooling to −40 °C, a new set of resonances grows in (Figure S31). Integration of these resonances indicates that at low temperature, the two mesityl groups are inequivalent, which is consistent with slow S─C bond rotation. Furthermore, the Mössbauer spectrum of a frozen THF solution of 11 exhibits significant broadening in comparison to the solid-state spectrum (Figure S34). Taken together, these studies suggest that multiple conformations of the monothiolate ligand are accessible in solution, and that they interconvert on the ms–s timescale in solution at room temperature.
Addition of 1 equiv of phenylhydrazine to 10 in benzene resulted in a slow color change from yellow to red-orange over the course of 2 h at room temperature, and 1H NMR spectroscopy indicated clean formation of a new iron(II) species (12). The XRD structure of 12 (Figure 5) reveals a four-coordinate complex with a distorted tetrahedral geometry (τ4 = 0.74). Importantly, the observation that the tetrahedral geometry of 10 and 11 is retained in 12 indicates that the low coordination number of these complexes is not due solely to steric congestion at the metal center. Furthermore, the phenylhydrazido ligand is bound κ1 rather than the typical η2 or bridging binding modes for deprotonated phenylhydrazine. To our knowledge, 12 is the first structurally characterized complex featuring a phenylhydrazido ligand with this binding mode.
Figure 5.
Thermal-ellipsoid plot of the XRD structure of 12 with thermal ellipsoids shown at the 50% probability level. Hydrogen atoms and K(18-crown-6)(THF)2 are omitted. Selected bond distances (A): Fe-S1: 2.3542(7), Fe-S2: 2.3501(8), Fe-C11: 2.057(2), Fe-N1: 1.963(2), N1-N2:1.470(5)
Only two other iron(II) phenylhydrazido complexes have been reported in the literature. In cis-[Fe(dmpe)2(η2-NH2NPh)]+, the phenylhydrazido moiety is bound side-on and has an N─N bond length of 1.400(5) Å.66 In the second example, the phenylhydrazido ligand binds μ-κN1:κN2 between two sulfide-bridged β-diketiminate-ligated iron centers and has an N─N bond length of 1.417(8) Å.67 In 12, the N─N bond is elongated to 1.470(5) Å, which is the same as the bond length for free phenylhydrazine68 (1.471 Å) suggesting that the N─N bond may be weakened relative to those of the other iron complexes.
Although it is stable in the solid state, 12 slowly decomposes in THF or benzene solutions over the course of several days at room temperature or several hours at 70 °C. Although we were unable to fully purify 12 due to this instability as well as its high moisture sensitivity, we were able to identify the major product of its degradation. After heating for 2.5 hours at 70 °C, 1H NMR spectroscopy reveals the presence of a new species formed in 35% spectroscopic yield (Figure 6). The similarity of the 1H NMR spectrum of this product to those of 11–12, particularly the sharp singlet at δ −55 ppm that integrates to 1H, suggests that the new product is an iron(II) complex with an anionic ligand containing a phenyl group. We therefore reasoned that the new species was likely a phenylamido complex.
Figure 6.
1H NMR spectra (400 MHz, THF-d8, 25 °C) of 12 before (top) and after (middle) heating at 70 °C for 2.5 h, leading to partial formation of 13 (35% based on comparison to a nickelocene standard). The spectrum of independently synthesized 13 is shown in the bottom panel.
To confirm this hypothesis, the phenylamido complex 13 was independently synthesized by heating 10 with excess aniline at 65 °C in THF. Crystalline 13 was isolated by layering a concentrated THF solution with diethyl ether at −40 °C, and XRD analysis confirms that it is structurally analogous to 10–12, with a distorted tetrahedral (τ4 = 0.73) geometry (Figure 7). The 1H NMR spectrum of this material is identical to that of the major NMR-active species formed from thermolysis of 12 (Figure 6). Analysis of the thermolysis product reaction mixture by Mössbauer spectroscopy confirms the presence of 13 and indicates the presence of multiple additional species which we have been unable to identify (Figure S51).
Figure 7.
Thermal-ellipsoid plot of the XRD structure of 13 with thermal ellipsoids shown at the 50% probability level. Hydrogen atoms except H1 and K(18c6) are omitted. Selected bond distances (A): Fe-S1: 2.342(1), Fe-S2: 2.3649(8), Fe-C11: 2.069(3), Fe-N1: 1.974(3).
It is notable that this system can break N─N bonds. A number of previously studied iron systems are also capable of cleaving the N─N bonds in hydrazines. Some of the literature systems even contain sulfur-containing ligands, such as β-diketiminate-supported sulfide-bridged diiron systems,67, 69 as well as thiolate-supported,70-71 phosphine-supported72 and pentamethylcyclopentadienyl-supported16 diiron complexes. In our current NHC/thiolate-supported system, the yield of the N─N cleaved product was too low for mechanistic studies that would enable this synthetic system to give insight into the enzymatic N─N cleavage process.
Conclusions
Here, we have reported a new pincer ligand with an SCS donor set that mimics nitrogenase intermediates. The isolation of these ligands is complicated by the acid-catalyzed rearrangement to a benzothiazole, which can be overcome with appropriate modifications. Importantly, the synthetic route allows incorporation of both thioethers and thiolates as S donors in a bulky SCS scaffold, which may be useful for a broad range of applications in addition to nitrogenase modeling.
The bis(thiolate) NHC ligand SCS2− is particularly notable as a ligand that gives four-coordinate high-spin anionic iron(II) complexes with X ligands in the fourth position. SCS2− can fold its core resulting in facial binding, which contrasts with the mer binding of the bis(thioether) NHC analog SMeCSMe. These examples illustrate the conformational flexibility of this scaffold, which contrasts with the more rigid scaffold in a set of iron complexes with an NHC-containing PCP pincer ligand recently reported by De Ruiter.73 Though these iron complexes were not pre-catalysts for N2 reduction due to their decomposition in the presence of acid, we were able to generate complexes of thiolate, hydrazido, and amido groups that take advantage of the biomimetic scaffold. Most notable is the unique κ1-phenylhydrazido complex, which models a potential N2 reduction intermediate and undergoes N─N cleavage.
Supplementary Material
Scheme 1.

Synthesis of Imidazolium Salts 6a and 6b
Scheme 3.

Synthesis of Bis(thioether) NHC Iron Complexes
Scheme 4.

Synthesis of 10
Table 1.
Fit parameters for Mössbauer spectra of 8 – 13 (mm/s)
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
We gratefully acknowledge funding from the National Institutes of Health (R01-GM065313 to P.L.H.; F32-GM123658 to A.L.S.; F32-GM126656 to K.L.S.). We thank Anna Brosnahan for performing preliminary investigations of sulfur-functionalized NHC ligands.
Footnotes
Supporting Information. The following files are available free of charge.
Synthetic procedures and spectroscopic data (PDF)
Crystallographic files (CIF)
REFERENCES
- 1.Zhang X; Ward BB; Sigman DM Global Nitrogen Cycle: Critical Enzymes, Organisms, and Processes for Nitrogen Budgets and Dynamics. Chem. Rev 2020, 120, 5308–5351. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Einsle O; Tezcan FA; Andrade SLA; Schmid B; Yoshida M; Howard JB; Rees DC Nitrogenase MoFe-Protein at 1.16 Å Resolution: A Central Ligand in the FeMo-Cofactor. Science 2002, 297, 1696–1700. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Lancaster KM; Roemelt M; Ettenhuber P; Hu Y; Ribbe MW; Neese F; Bergmann U; DeBeer S X-ray Emission Spectroscopy Evidences a Central Carbon in the Nitrogenase Iron-Molybdenum Cofactor. Science 2011, 334, 974–977. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Spatzal T; Aksoyoglu M; Zhang L; Andrade SLA; Schleicher E; Weber S; Rees DC; Einsle O Evidence for Interstitial Carbon in Nitrogenase FeMo Cofactor. Science 2011, 334, 940. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Einsle O; Rees DC Structural Enzymology of Nitrogenase Enzymes. Chem. Rev 2020, 120, 4969–5004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Hoffman BM; Lukoyanov D; Dean DR; Seefeldt LC Nitrogenase: A Draft Mechanism. Acc. Chem. Res 2013, 46, 587–595. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Hoffman BM; Lukoyanov D; Yang Z-Y; Dean DR; Seefeldt LC Mechanism of Nitrogen Fixation by Nitrogenase: The Next Stage. Chem. Rev 2014, 114, 4041–4062. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Seefeldt LC; Yang ZY; Lukoyanov DA; Harris DF; Dean DR; Raugei S; Hoffman BM Reduction of Substrates by Nitrogenases. Chem. Rev 2020, 120, 5082–5106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Spatzal T; Perez KA; Einsle O; Howard JB; Rees DC Ligand binding to the FeMo-cofactor: Structures of CO-bound and reactivated nitrogenase. Science 2014, 345, 1620–1623. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Spatzal T; Perez KA; Howard JB; Rees DC Catalysis-dependent selenium incorporation and migration in the nitrogenase active site iron-molybdenum cofactor. eLife 2015, 4, e11620. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Sippel D; Rohde M; Netzer J; Trncik C; Gies J; Grunau K; Djurdjevic I; Decamps L; Andrade SLA; Einsle O A bound reaction intermediate sheds light on the mechanism of nitrogenase. Science 2018, 359, 1484–1489. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Kang W; Lee CC; Jasniewski AJ; Ribbe MW; Hu Y Structural evidence for a dynamic metallocofactor during N2 reduction by Mo-nitrogenase. Science 2020, 368, 1381–1385. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Ibers JA; Holm RH Modeling coordination sites in metallobiomolecules. Science 1980, 209, 223–35. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Crossland JL; Tyler DR Iron–dinitrogen coordination chemistry: Dinitrogen activation and reactivity. Coord. Chem. Rev 2010, 254, 1883–1894. [Google Scholar]
- 15.Chalkley MJ; Drover MW; Peters JC Catalytic N2-to-NH3 (or −N2H4) Conversion by Well-Defined Molecular Coordination Complexes. Chem. Rev 2020, 120, 5582–5636. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Chen Y; Zhou Y; Chen P; Tao Y; Li Y; Qu J Nitrogenase Model Complexes: Synthesis, Structure, and Catalytic N-N Bond Cleavage of Hydrazines on Diiron Centers. J. Am. Chem. Soc 2008, 130, 15250–15251. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Chen Y; Liu L; Peng Y; Chen P; Luo Y; Qu J Unusual Thiolate-Bridged Diiron Clusters Bearing the cis-HN═NH Ligand and Their Reactivities with Terminal Alkynes. J. Am. Chem. Soc 2011, 133, 1147–1149. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Li Y; Li Y; Wang B; Luo Y; Yang D; Tong P; Zhao J; Luo L; Zhou Y; Chen S; Cheng F; Qu J Ammonia formation by a thiolate-bridged diiron amide complex as a nitrogenase mimic. Nat. Chem 2013, 5, 320–326. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Ćorić I; Holland PL Insight into the Iron–Molybdenum Cofactor of Nitrogenase from Synthetic Iron Complexes with Sulfur, Carbon, and Hydride Ligands. J. Am. Chem. Soc 2016, 138, 7200–7211. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Speelman AL; Holland PL, Sulfur-Supported Iron Complexes for Understanding N2 Reduction. In Nitrogen Fixation, Nishibayashi Y, Ed. Springer International Publishing: Cham, 2017; pp 197–213. [Google Scholar]
- 21.Tanifuji K; Ohki Y Metal-Sulfur Compounds in N2 Reduction and Nitrogenase-Related Chemistry. Chem. Rev 2020, 120, 5194–5251. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Ćorić I; Mercado BQ; Bill E; Vinyard DJ; Holland PL Binding of dinitrogen to an iron-sulfur-carbon site. Nature 2015, 526, 96–99. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Speelman AL; Coric I; Van Stappen C; DeBeer S; Mercado BQ; Holland PL Nitrogenase-Relevant Reactivity of a Synthetic Iron-Sulfur-Carbon Site. J. Am. Chem. Soc 2019, 141, 13148–13157. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Mézailles N; Le Floch P, S─P─S and S─C─S pincer ligands in coordination chemistry and catalysis. In The Chemistry of Pincer Compounds, Morales-Morales D; Jensen CM, Eds. Elsevier Science: 2007; pp 235–271. [Google Scholar]
- 25.Castillo I, Transition Metal Complexes With Anionic Sulfur-Based Pincer Ligands. In Pincer Compounds, Morales-Morales D, Ed. 2018; pp 415–430. [Google Scholar]
- 26.Ingleson MJ; Layfield RA N-Heterocyclic carbene chemistry of iron: fundamentals and applications. Chem. Commun 2012, 48, 3579–89. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Riener K; Haslinger S; Raba A; Hogerl MP; Cokoja M; Herrmann WA; Kuhn FE Chemistry of iron N-heterocyclic carbene complexes: syntheses, structures, reactivities, and catalytic applications. Chem. Rev 2014, 114, 5215–5272. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Liang Q; Song D Iron N-heterocyclic carbene complexes in homogeneous catalysis. Chem. Soc. Rev 2020, 49, 1209–1232. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Deng L; Holm RH Stabilization of Fully Reduced Iron–Sulfur Clusters by Carbene Ligation: The [FenSn]0 Oxidation Levels (n = 4, 8). J. Am. Chem. Soc 2008, 130, 9878–9886. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Brown AC; Suess DLM Controlling Substrate Binding to Fe4S4 Clusters through Remote Steric Effects. Inorg. Chem 2019, 58, 5273–5280. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Ye M; Thompson NB; Brown AC; Suess DLM A Synthetic Model of Enzymatic [Fe4S4]–Alkyl Intermediates. J. Am. Chem. Soc 2019, 141, 13330–13335. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Brown AC; Suess DLM Reversible Formation of Alkyl Radicals at [Fe4S4] Clusters and Its Implications for Selectivity in Radical SAM Enzymes. J. Am. Chem. Soc 2020, 142, 14240–14248. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Zlatogorsky S; Muryn CA; Tuna F; Evans DJ; Ingleson MJ Synthesis, Structures, and Reactivity of Chelating Bis-N-Heterocyclic-Carbene Complexes of Iron(II). Organometallics 2011, 30, 4974–4982. [Google Scholar]
- 34.Pugh T; Layfield RA Reactivity of three-coordinate iron–NHC complexes towards phenylselenol and lithium phenylselenide. Dalton Trans. 2014, 43, 4251–4254. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Danopoulos AA; Wright JA; Motherwell WB Molecular N2 complexes of iron stabilised by N-heterocyclic ‘pincer’ dicarbene ligands. Chem. Commun 2005, 784–786. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Pugh D; Wells NJ; Evans DJ; Danopoulos AA Reactions of ‘pincer’ pyridine dicarbene complexes of Fe(0) with silanes. Dalton Trans. 2009, 7189–7195. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Yu RP; Darmon JM; Hoyt JM; Margulieux GW; Turner ZR; Chirik PJ High-Activity Iron Catalysts for the Hydrogenation of Hindered, Unfunctionalized Alkenes. ACS Catal. 2012, 2, 1760–1764. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Darmon JM; Yu RP; Semproni SP; Turner ZR; Stieber SCE; DeBeer S; Chirik PJ Electronic Structure Determination of Pyridine N-Heterocyclic Carbene Iron Dinitrogen Complexes and Neutral Ligand Derivatives. Organometallics 2014, 33, 5423–5433. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Ouyang Z; Cheng J; Li L; Bao X; Deng L High-Spin Iron(I) and Iron(0) Dinitrogen Complexes Supported by N-Heterocyclic Carbene Ligands. Chem. Eur. J 2016, 22, 14162–14165. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Yu RP; Darmon JM; Semproni SP; Turner ZR; Chirik PJ Synthesis of Iron Hydride Complexes Relevant to Hydrogen Isotope Exchange in Pharmaceuticals. Organometallics 2017, 36, 4341–4343. [Google Scholar]
- 41.Liang Q; Song D Reactivity of Fe and Ru Complexes of Picolyl-Substituted N-Heterocyclic Carbene Ligand: Diverse Coordination Modes and Small Molecule Binding. Inorg. Chem 2017, 56, 11956–11970. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Reiners M; Baabe D; Zaretzke M-K; Freytag M; Walter MD Reversible dinitrogen binding to [Cp′Fe(NHC)] associated with an N2-induced spin state change. Chem. Commun 2017, 53, 7274–7277. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Jackson BJ; Najera DC; Matson EM; Woods TJ; Bertke JA; Fout AR Synthesis and Characterization of (DIPPCCC)Fe Complexes: A Zwitterionic Metalation Method and CO2 Reactivity. Organometallics 2019, 38, 2943–2952. [Google Scholar]
- 44.Ung G; Peters JC Low-Temperature N2 Binding to Two-Coordinate L2Fe0 Enables Reductive Trapping of L2FeN2− and NH3 Generation. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed 2015, 54, 532–535. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Peris E Smart N-Heterocyclic Carbene Ligands in Catalysis. Chem. Rev 2018, 118, 9988–10031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Evans KJ; Mansell SM Functionalised N-Heterocyclic Carbene Ligands in Bimetallic Architectures. Chem. Eur. J 2020, 26, 5927–5941. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Hameury S; de Fremont P; Braunstein P Metal complexes with oxygen-functionalized NHC ligands: synthesis and applications. Chem. Soc. Rev 2017, 46, 632–733. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Liddle ST; Edworthy IS; Arnold PL Anionic tethered N-heterocyclic carbene chemistry. Chem. Soc. Rev 2007, 36, 1732–44. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Kühl O, Functionalised N-Heterocyclic Carbene Complexes. John Wiley & Sons Ltd: Chichester, West Sussex, United Kingdom, 2010. [Google Scholar]
- 50.Bierenstiel M; Cross ED Sulfur-functionalized N-heterocyclic carbenes and their transition metal complexes. Coord. Chem. Rev 2011, 255, 574–590. [Google Scholar]
- 51.Fliedel C; Braunstein P Recent advances in S-functionalized N-heterocyclic carbene ligands: From the synthesis of azolium salts and metal complexes to applications. J. Organomet. Chem 2014, 751, 286–300. [Google Scholar]
- 52.Sellmann D; Prechtel W; Knoch F; Moll M Transition-metal complexes with sulfur ligands. 89. Unexpected formation of the highly stable binuclear nickel carbene complex [Ni(S2C)]2 from nickel(II) salts, diamine-dithiolate ligands, and C1 components [S2C2− = 1,3-imidazolidine-1,3-diylbis(2-benzenethiolate)(2−)]. Organometallics 1992, 11, 2346–2348. [Google Scholar]
- 53.Sellmann D; Prechtel W; Knoch F; Moll M Transition-metal complexes with sulfur ligands. 94. Synthesis and reactivity of nickel, palladium, and platinum complexes with the thiolate carbene ligand 'S2C'2− X-ray structure determinations of [Ni(PMe3)('S2C')], [Ni(PPh3)('S2C')], [Ni('SC')2], [Pt(PMe3)('S2C')], and ('S2CO')2. Inorg. Chem 1993, 32, 538–546. [Google Scholar]
- 54.Sellmann D; Allmann C; Heinemann F; Knoch F; Sutter J ϋbergangsmetallkomplexe mit Schwefelliganden CXXIV. Koordination von C- und S-Liganden an Metall-Carben-Thiolat-Fragmente [M(‘S2C’)] [M = NiII, PdII, PtII; ‘S2C’2− = 1,3-Imidazolidinyl-N,N'-bis(2-benzolthiolat)(2−)]. [M(L)(‘S2C’)]-Komplexe mit L = CN−, CH3−, COCH3−, CNBu, CR2, SH− und SR− (R = Et, Ph, o-C6H4NH2). J. Organomet. Chem 1997, 541, 291–305. [Google Scholar]
- 55.Sellmann D; Käppler O Transition Metal Complexes with Sulfur Ligands XXXII. Synthesis of the Sterically Demanding New Thiolate-amine Ligands tBu2-ma-H = 2-mercapto-3,5-di-tbutylaniline and tbu4-bmae-H2 = 1,2-Bis(2-mercapto-3,5-di-tbutylanilino)ethane as well as of their Iron, Ruthenium, and Zinc Complexes [Fe(CO)2(tBu2-ma)2], [Zn(tbu2-ma)2], and [RuL2(tbu4-bmae)], L = CO, PMe3, PPh3. Z. Naturforsch. B 1987, 42, 1291–1297. [Google Scholar]
- 56.Surry DS; Buchwald SL Selective palladium-catalyzed arylation of ammonia: synthesis of anilines as well as symmetrical and unsymmetrical di- and triarylamines. J. Am. Chem. Soc 2007, 129, 10354–10355. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Benhamou L; Chardon E; Lavigne G; Bellemin-Laponnaz S; César V Synthetic routes to N-heterocyclic carbene precursors. Chem. Rev 2011, 111, 2705–2733. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Despagnet-Ayoub E; Henling LM; Labinger JA; Bercaw JE Group 4 Transition-Metal Complexes of an Aniline–Carbene–Phenol Ligand. Organometallics 2013, 32, 2934–2938. [Google Scholar]
- 59.Despagnet-Ayoub E; Miqueu K; Sotiropoulos J-M; Henling LM; Day MW; Labinger JA; Bercaw JE Unexpected rearrangements in the synthesis of an unsymmetrical tridentate dianionic N-heterocyclic carbene. Chem. Sci 2013, 4, 2117–2121. [Google Scholar]
- 60.Ghosh P; Begum A; Bill E; Weyhermüller T; Wieghardt K Molecular and electronic structures of iron(II)/(III) complexes containing N,S-coordinated, closed-shell o-aminothiophenolato(1-) and o-iminothiophenolato(2-) ligands. Inorg. Chem 2003, 42, 3208–3215. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Presow SR; Ghosh M; Bill E; Weyhermuller T; Wieghardt K Molecular and electronic structures of new iron complexes containing N,S-coordinated o-iminothionebenzosemiquinonate(1-) π radical ligands: An experimental and density functional theoretical study. Inorg. Chim. Acta 2011, 374, 226–239. [Google Scholar]
- 62.Ghosh P; Bill E; Weyhermuller T; Wieghardt K Molecular and electronic structures of iron complexes containing N,S-coordinated, open-shell o-iminothionebenzosemiquinonate(1-) π radicals. J. Am. Chem. Soc 2003, 125, 3967–79. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Gravogl L; Heinemann FW; Munz D; Meyer K An Iron Pincer Complex in Four Oxidation States. Inorg. Chem 2020, 59, 5632–5645. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Yang L; Powell DR; Houser RP Structural variation in copper(I) complexes with pyridylmethylamide ligands: structural analysis with a new four-coordinate geometry index, tau4. Dalton Trans 2007, 955–64. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Baltrun M; Watt FA; Schoch R; Hohloch S Dioxo-, Oxo-imido-, and Bis-imido-Molybdenum(VI) Complexes with a Bis-phenolate-NHC Ligand. Organometallics 2019, 38, 3719–3729. [Google Scholar]
- 66.Field LD; Li HL; Dalgarno SJ; McIntosh RD Side-on bound complexes of phenyl- and methyl-diazene. Inorg. Chem 2012, 51, 3733–42. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Vela J; Stoian S; Flaschenriem CJ; Munck E; Holland PL A sulfido-bridged diiron(II) compound and its reactions with nitrogenase-relevant substrates. J. Am. Chem. Soc 2004, 126, 4522–3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Srinivasan S; Swaminathan S The crystal structure of phenyl hydrazine, C6H5·NH·NH2. Z. Kristallogr. Krist 1968, 127, 442–449. [Google Scholar]
- 69.Stubbert BD; Vela J; Brennessel WW; Holland PL A Sulfide-Bridged Diiron(II) Complex with a N2H4 Ligand. Z. Anorg. Allg. Chem 2013, 639, 1351–1355. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Sellmann D; Friedrich H; Knoch F Transition-Metal Complexes with Sulfur Ligands, CI. Synthesis and Structure of N2H5[Fe(N2H4)(S2C6H4)2 • 1.33 N2H4. Z. Naturforsch. B 1994, 49, 660–664. [Google Scholar]
- 71.Zdilla MJ; Verma AK; Lee SC Reactivity of a Sterically Hindered Fe(II) Thiolate Dimer with Amines and Hydrazines. Inorg. Chem 2008, 47, 11382–11390. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Creutz SE; Peters JC Diiron Bridged-Thiolate Complexes That Bind N2 at the FeIIFeII, FeIIFeI, and FeIFeI Redox States. J. Am. Chem. Soc 2015, 137, 7310–7313. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Garhwal S; Kaushansky A; Fridman N; Shimon LJW; de Ruiter G Facile H/D Exchange at (Hetero)Aromatic Hydrocarbons Catalyzed by a Stable Trans-Dihydride N-Heterocyclic Carbene (NHC) Iron Complex. J. Am. Chem. Soc 2020, 142, 17131–17139. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.








