To the Editor:
Although bullous disorders (BDs) are increasingly recognized as associated with PD-1 (nivolumab [NI], pembrolizumab [PE]) and PD-L1 inhibitors (atezolizumab [AT], avelumab [AV], durvalumab [DU]), the characterization of BD events in the Full Prescribing Information (FPI) for these agents is not well-delineated as represented by the FPIs for NI (PD-1)1 and AV (PD-L1)2.
When used as monotherapy, the most recent FPIs for these agents, collectively through 2018, simply report dermatologic events as “Rash, All Grades” (up to 40% of patients) and “Rash, Grades 3-4” (up to 1.6% of patients). Moreover, although “Rash, Grades 3-4” is variously described, it is not specific to BDs. Yet, a retrospective analysis of data from 853 oncodermatology patients [each of whom were treated with one of the five PD-1 or PD-L1 inhibitors] found nearly 1% of patients experienced a BD3.
We therefore aimed to determine if an association exists between PD-1/PD-L1 agents and BDs in the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS). Using RADAR methodology4, we searched FAERS from the first FDA approval date (table 1) to the last quarter for which data were available (Q1 2018).
Table 1.
Drug (Class) | N | Safety Signal 5 for BD | Date of FDA Approval |
---|---|---|---|
Nivolumab (PD-1) | 99 | Yes | Dec 22, 2014 |
Pembrolizumab (PD-1) | 43 | Yes | Sep 2, 2014 |
Atezolizumab (PD-L1) | 7 | Yes | May 18, 2016 |
Durvalumab (PD-L1) | 4 | Yes | May 1, 2017 |
Avelumab (PD-L1) | 0 | No | Mar 23, 2017 |
The FAERS database was searched using MedDRA BD terms (Pemphigoid, Pemphigus, and Bullous Dermatitis) for patients receiving PD-1 (nivolumab, pembrolizumab) and PD-L1 inhibitors (atezolizumab, avelumab, durvalumab) and linked to a serious outcome (Death, Disability, Hospitalization, Life-Threatening, Required Intervention to Prevent Permanent Impairment/Damage, or Other Serious). Proportional Reporting Ratio (PRR) was used for detection of a safety signal. PRR corresponds to the ratio of observed frequency (occurrence of the adverse event(s) of interest) in the exposed population (drug(s) of interest) to the non-exposed population (table 2). It is a measure of association and may be considered by some to be the equivalent of the Relative Risk (RR) used for cohort studies. A safety signal is detected if the follow criteria are met: number of events >3, chi-square result >4, and PRR >2 5.
Table 2.
2x2 Table | ||
---|---|---|
Drug of Interest | All Other drugs | |
Adverse Event of Interest | a | b |
All other Adverse Events | c | d |
PRR = a/(a + c) divided by b/(b + d)
A safety signal was detected in FAERS for PD-1 inhibitors: NI (N=99; PRR: 5.87; 95 %CI: 4.88-7.29), PE (N=43; PRR: 6.36; 95%CI: 4.71-8.59), and for 2 of 3 PD-L1 inhibitors: AT (N=7; PRR: 3.31; 95%CI: 1.58-6.95) and DU (N=4; PRR: 7.87; 95%CI: 2.96-20.96). Although there were no reports for BDs with AV, this finding may or may not indicate there is a lower risk for BDs with AV. Importantly, for all agents, these findings do not indicate causality and cannot be used to determine incidence or risk ratio 5.
A limitation for this study includes reporting bias within a voluntary reporting system such as FAERS along with possible report redundancy. Also, the retrospective nature of this study precludes chart review and verification of previously collected data collected.
This post-marketing real-world data analysis revealed an association between BDs and exposure to a PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor, in aggregate. Given that additional data are emerging for BDs and PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors, these current findings from the FAERS database serve to further inform practitioners of newly evolving information about the risk for bullous disorders associated with these agents.
Acknowledgments
Funding Source:
None
Conflicts of interest:
Dr. Lacouture has a consultant/speaking role with Legacy, Adgero, Amryt, Celldex, Debiopharm, Galderma, Johnson and Johnson, Novocure, Merck Sharp and Dohme, Helsinn, Janssen, Menlo, Novartis, F. Hoffmann-La Roche AG, AbbVie Inc, Boehringer Ingelheim, Allergan, Amgen, E.R. Squibb & Sons LLC, EMD Serono, Astrazeneca, Genentech, Leo, Loxo, Oncoderm, Seattle Genetics, Bayer, Lutris, Pierre Fabre, Paxman Coolers, Biotechspert, Teva, Parexel, OnQuality, Novartis, Harborside, Wiley, Azitra, ADC Therapeutics, QED, Lutris, NCODA, Oncoderm, Apricity and Takeda Millenium. Dr. Lacouture also receives research funding from Berg, Lutris, Paxman, Novocure, J&J, US Biotest, and Veloce, and is funded in part through the NIH/NCI Cancer Center Support Grant P30 CA008748.
Footnotes
Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.
REFERENCES
- 1.Opdivo (nivolumab) [Full Prescribing Information]. Bristol-Myers Squibb; 2018 [Google Scholar]
- 2.Bavencio (avelumab) [Full Prescribing Information], Merck KGaA; 2017 [Google Scholar]
- 3.Siegel J, Totonchy M, Damsky W, et al. Bullous disorders associated with anti-PD-1 and anti-PD-L1 therapy: A retrospective analysis evaluating the clinical and histopathologic features, frequency, and impact on cancer therapy. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2018;79(6):1081–1088 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.McKoy JM, Fisher MJ, Courtney DM, et al. Results from the first decade of research conducted by the Research on Adverse Drug events And Reports (RADAR) project. Drug Saf. 2013;36: 335–347. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Sakaeda T, Tamon A, Kadoyama K, Okuno Y. Data mining of the public version of the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System. Int J Med Sci. 2013;10: 796–803. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]