Skip to main content
JAMA Network logoLink to JAMA Network
. 2021 Jun 16;4(6):e2116416. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.16416

Incidence of SARS-CoV-2 Infection in Health Care Workers After a Single Dose of mRNA-1273 Vaccine

Kalpana Gupta 1, William J O’Brien 1, Pamela Bellino 1, Katherine Linsenmeyer 1, Sucheta J Doshi 1, Robert S Sprague 1, Michael E Charness 1,
PMCID: PMC8209555  PMID: 34132795

Abstract

This cohort study of health care workers in a metropolitan Veterans Administration network examines the association of SARS-CoV-2 infection after receiving a single dose of mRNA-1273 vaccine compared with no vaccination.

Introduction

A 2021 randomized clinical trial1 demonstrated remarkably high efficacy of mRNA-1273 vaccine in reducing symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection after 2 doses administered 28 days apart; however, low numbers of infection during the first 2 weeks following dose 1 prevented full assessment of early vaccine efficacy. VA Boston Healthcare System (VABHS) began vaccinating health care workers (HCWs) during an early winter surge in SARS-CoV-2 infections in Massachusetts.2 A concomitant large increase in SARS-CoV-2 infections in our workforce provided an opportunity to evaluate the association between receipt of dose 1 of mRNA-1273 vaccine and SARS-CoV-2 infection.

Methods

For this cohort study, we performed a retrospective survival analysis using a Cox proportional hazards model with a single time-varying treatment to estimate the hazard ratio (HR) of acquiring SARS-CoV-2 in vaccinated compared with unvaccinated HCWs. All VABHS clinical and nonclinical HCWs were included, and the study period was 42 days starting on December 22, 2020, the first day of vaccine availability. Treatment status changed from unvaccinated to vaccinated on the date of dose 1, and time prior to vaccination contributed to unvaccinated risk. Dose 2 was administered 28 days after dose 1 (or within 4 days before or after that date). The primary end point was a SARS-CoV-2 reverse transcription–polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) positive test.3 All HCWs were offered mRNA-1273 vaccine in accord with US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention priority guidelines. Testing was triggered by policy for HCWs with symptoms, exposure, or for mandatory surveillance on selected units.3 To account for the time required for the development of immunity,4 we calculated 2 additional HRs excluding infections arising in the vaccinated group before days 8 and 15 following dose 1, respectively. Vaccine effectiveness was calculated as 100% × (1−HR). Analyses were performed in R version 4.0.4 (R Project for Statistical Computing). P < .05 was considered significant in 2-sided tests. This study followed Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) reporting guideline for cohort studies. Race was self-classified in human resources databases and was included for analysis because of racial differences in vaccine hesitancy and community transmission. Because risk to participants was minimal and the study was deemed a quality improvement project, informed consent and review were exempted by the VABHS institutional review board.

Results

The cohort comprised 4028 total HCWs (mean [SD] age, 48.1 [12.1] years; 2473 [61.4%] women; 2682 [66.6%] White, 810 [20.1%] Black) (Table), of which 3367 (83.6%) were vaccinated during the study period. SARS-CoV-2 infection was identified by RT-PCR in 107 HCWs: 39 vaccinated and 68 unvaccinated. Most infections (75 infections [73.5%]) were symptomatic, and 7 (6.5%) were identified during routine surveillance (Table). Vaccinated and unvaccinated RT-PCR–positive HCWs did not differ significantly by age, gender, race, proportion of nursing staff, or clinical presentation. Among the 39 SARS-COV-2–positive vaccinated HCWs, 26 (66.7%) received dose 1 before December 29, 2020. Vaccine clinical effectiveness was 50.3% (95% CI, 23.0%-67.9%) for the entire 42-day period of follow-up, 77.5% (95% CI, 61.2%-87.0%) for days 8 through 42, and 95.0% (95% CI, 86.0%-98.2%) for days 15 through 42 (Figure). Clinical effectiveness was similar when analysis was limited to the initial 28 days of study, thereby excluding dose 2 effects.

Table. Demographic and Clinical Characteristics of SARS-CoV-2–Positive HCWs.

Characteristics HCWs, No. (%) P valuea
Total (n = 4028) SARS-CoV-2 positive
Vaccinated (n = 39) Unvaccinated (n = 68)
Demographicb
Age, mean (SD), y 48.1 (12.1) 47.9 (17.0) 42.5 (13.2) .07
Female 2473 (61.4) 21 (53.8) 45 (66.2) .21
Male 1555 (38.6) 18 (46.2) 23 (33.8)
Racec
Black 810 (20.1) 4 (10.3) 14 (20.6) .14
White 2682 (66.6) 29 (74.4) 50 (73.5)
Other 492 (12) 6 (15.4) 4 (5.9)
Nursing staff 1139 (28.3) 15 (38.5) 23 (33.8) .63
Indication for testing
Symptoms NA 25 (64.1) 50 (73.5) .42
Exposure NA 10 (25.6) 15 (22.1)
Surveillanced NA 4 (10.3) 3 (4.4)
Clinical condition at time of positive PCR
Symptomatic NA 27 (69.2) 51 (75.0) .68
Presymptomatic NA 4 (10.3) 4 (5.9)
Asymptomatic NA 8 (20.5) 13 (11.8)

Abbreviations: HCW, health care worker; NA, not applicable.

a

P values represent comparisons of vaccinated and unvaccinated SARS-CoV-2–positive HCWs. Age was compared using a t test, and percentages were compared using χ2.

b

Demographic data were approximated for the entire population based on human resources databases but were not stratified for vaccination status.

c

Race was self-identified from administratively defined options. Other includes Asian, Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander, American Indian or Alaska Native, and 2 or more races.

d

At least weekly surveillance was conducted on an average of 400 HCWs during the study period.

Figure. Clinical Effectiveness of Dose 1 of mRNA-1273 Vaccine Against SARS-CoV-2 Infection.

Figure.

Hazard ratios were computed for all health care workers from day 1 (model 1), day 8 (model 2), or day 15 (model 3) after receipt of dose 1 until either day 28 (dark bars) or day 42 (light bars). Error bars indicate 95% CIs. Limiting the analysis to the period before dose 2 (28 days) did not change the outcome.

Discussion

This study demonstrated an association between receipt of mRNA-1273 vaccine and a reduction in SARS-CoV-2 infection in HCWs beginning 8 days after dose 1. These real-world findings reflect vaccination solely with mRNA-1273 and are consistent with aggregated data for BNT162b2 and mRNA-1273 in HCWs.4,5,6 The first-dose risk reduction of 95% after day 14 highlights the potential for vaccination with mRNA-1273 to rapidly mitigate surges of vaccine-sensitive SARS-CoV-2 infection in HCWs.

Limitations of the study include the observational design, the small number of participants from a single center, and the inability to adjust for confounding characteristics; hence, results may not generalize to other settings with different demographic characteristics. The period of risk for infection was slightly later for the vaccinated cohort than the unvaccinated cohort. However, the study encompassed a sustained period of high community transmission.2 Black HCWs constituted a higher percentage of the SARS-CoV-2–positive unvaccinated cohort, although these data were not statistically significant. Finally, these findings address primarily the short-term effects of a single dose of mRNA-1273 vaccine.

References

  • 1.Baden LR, El Sahly HM, Essink B, et al. Efficacy and safety of the mRNA-1273 SARS-CoV-2 vaccine. N Engl J Med. 2021;384(5):403-416. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2035389 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.State of Massachusetts . Archive of COVID-19 cases in Massachusetts. Mass.gov. Created March 9, 2020. Accessed March 23, 2021. https://www.mass.gov/info-details/archive-of-covid-19-cases-in-massachusetts
  • 3.Gupta K, Bellino P, Samano J, et al. Minimal population prevalence and mortality of COVID-19 in health care personnel. Open Forum Infect Dis. 2021;8(2):ofaa618. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofaa618 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Thompson MG, Burgess JL, Naleway AL, et al. Interim estimates of vaccine effectiveness of BNT162b2 and mRNA-1273 COVID-19 vaccines in preventing SARS-CoV-2 infection among health care personnel, first responders, and other essential and frontline workers—eight US locations, December 2020-March 2021. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2021;70(13):495-500. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm7013e3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Keehner J, Horton LE, Pfeffer MA, et al. SARS-CoV-2 infection after vaccination in health care workers in California. N Engl J Med. 2021;384(18):1774-1775. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc2101927 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Daniel W, Nivet M, Warner J, Podolsky DK. Early evidence of the effect of SARS-CoV-2 vaccine at one medical center. N Engl J Med. 2021. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc2102153 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from JAMA Network Open are provided here courtesy of American Medical Association

RESOURCES