Abstract
Urogenital Chlamydia trachomatis infection is the most common sexually transmitted bacterial infection throughout the world. While progress has been made to better understand how type strains develop and respond to environmental stress in vitro, very few studies have examined how clinical isolates behave under similar conditions. Here, we examined the development and persistence phenotypes of several clinical isolates, to determine how similar they are to each other, and the type strain C. trachomatis D/UW-3/Cx. The type strain was shown to produce infectious progeny at a higher magnitude than each of the clinical isolates, in each of the six tested cell lines. All chlamydial strains produced the highest number of infectious progeny at 44 h post-infection in the McCoy B murine fibroblast cell line, yet showed higher levels of infectivity in the MCF-7 human epithelial cell line. The clinical isolates were shown to be more susceptible than the type strain to the effects of penicillin and iron deprivation persistence models in the MCF-7 cell line. While subtle differences between clinical isolates were observed throughout the experiments conducted, no significant differences were identified. This study reinforces the importance of examining clinical isolates when trying to relate in vitro data to clinical outcomes, as well as the importance of considering the adaptations many type strains have to being cultured in vitro.
Keywords: Chlamydia trachomatis, persistence, clinical isolates, iron, penicillin
Introduction
Chlamydia trachomatis is an obligate intracellular pathogen and is the most common bacterial sexually transmitted infection (STI) worldwide. There are more than 83000 Chlamydia infections recorded in Australia each year [1]. The pathology and sequelae associated with chlamydial diseases are thought to be associated with the infected individual’s inflammatory response and potentially influenced by a number of important host factors [2]. In women, chlamydial disease ranges from mild cases of cervicitis, endometritis and salpingitis, to more serious cases of pelvic inflammatory disease (PID), tubal infertility and life-threatening ectopic pregnancy [3–5].
Cases of urogenital Chlamydia are treated with either azithromycin or doxycycline. While evidence suggests doxycycline (usually 7 day regimen) is slightly more effective at clearing infection, 1 g single-dose azithromycin is often prescribed for its simple one-off treatment dose [6, 7]. Azithromycin is a broad-spectrum macrolide antibiotic with a relatively long half-life (40–68 h) and high lipid solubility, and accumulates within macrophages migrating to the site of infection [8, 9]. Despite its high efficacy, instances do occur in which monitored women remain infected after treatment. The reasons for this remain unclear, but potential explanations include: reinfection from an untreated partner, chlamydial gastrointestinal colonization and auto-inoculation of the cervical site or treatment failure [10, 11]. Direct macrolide resistance is generally not considered a probable cause due to the antibiotic’s mechanism of action, and the scarcity of clinical isolates with validated genotypic or phenotypic resistance to azithromycin [12–16]. Furthermore, mutants created in vitro with single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in their 23S rRNA and L4 protein-encoding genes show poor biological fitness and viability [17–20], further supporting that their emergence in the population is likely to be rare.
When combined, in vitro and clinical evidence suggests that C. trachomatis rarely survives treatment, which prpbably reflects both the pathogen and its intracellular niche. One candidate mechanism is chlamydial persistence, which is believed to be a positive and beneficial adaptation unique to the genus Chlamydia [21, 22]. The persistence phenotype is characterized by several reversible morphological, transcriptional and metabolic changes [23–27]. The collective profiles of these changes vary depending on the inducer of persistence; however, the morphologically aberrant chlamydial cells observed during persistence, altered inclusion sizes, and the reversible loss of both cultivability and replicative capacity are the universal hallmarks of chlamydial persistence (reviewed previously [28]).
Several environmental conditions and exogenous stimuli have been demonstrated to induce chlamydial persistence in vitro [29]. Penicillin and IFN-γ are two of the most extensively studied of these stimuli, and have both been used to characterize different aspects of the persistence phenotype, as reviewed by Wyrick [28]. Use of the iron-chelating agent deferoxamine mesylate has shown that iron restriction not only induces persistence in C. trachomatis , but also alters the pathogen’s signalling pathways that modulate host-cell apoptosis [30, 31]. Interestingly, IFN-γ also decreases cellular levels of iron in infected cells by downregulating their transferrin receptor expression [32].
Previous investigations into chlamydial persistence have established that type strains have variations in their degree of responsiveness to certain stimuli, and have altered susceptibilities to antibiotics while in the persistent state [33–36]. In the present study, we examined the in vitro phenotypes of selected clinical isolates of C. trachomatis isolated during the Australian Chlamydia Treatment Study (ACTS) [11]. Their relative abilities to infect and develop in different cell lines were measured, as were their responses to two widely used and physiologically relevant models of in vitro chlamydial persistence. Their susceptibility to azithromycin during persistence was also investigated, to better understand whether persistence has implications for treatment with frontline antibiotics when analysed on recent clinical isolates.
Methods
Cell culture and cultivation of Chlamydia
McCoy B, MCF-7, CACO-2, HeLa, SiHa and ARPE-19 cell lines (details in Table 1) were cultured in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle medium (DMEM) supplemented with 10 % (v/v) fetal calf serum (FCS; Sigma), 4 mM analyl-glutamine (Sigma), 100 μg ml−1 streptomycin (Life Technologies) and 50 μg ml−1 gentamicin (Life Technologies). A range of cell types available to the study were selected to profile any possible differences in the clinical isolates. All cell lines were incubated at 37 °C in a humid environment containing 5 % CO2. All cell lines were regularly confirmed to be free of Mycoplasma contamination using either an in-house PCR, or the Mycoalert Plus Mycoplasma Detection Kit assay (Lonza). All six clinical isolates used were obtained from the ACTS. This was a cohort study of women diagnosed with and treated for genital Chlamydia [11] to examine factors associated with repeat chlamydia infection. In one case, two isolates from one participant after a repeat positive event were included in the study in the event that they prove to have some detectable difference in persistence phenotypes to those analysed here. Isolates were collected from infected women using swabs stored in a 2 ml cryovial tube containing a sucrose-phosphate glutamate (SPG) buffer, at −80 °C, and couriered on dry ice. A unique code has been generated to identify each isolate purely for the purposes of this paper.
Table 1.
Mammalian cell lines used in this study
|
Name |
Cell type |
Origin |
ATCC code |
|---|---|---|---|
|
McCoy B |
Fibroblast |
Fibroblast from Mus musculus |
CRL-1696 |
|
MCF-7 |
Epithelial |
Human mammary epithelium |
HTB-22 |
|
CACO-2 |
Epithelial |
Human colorectal adenocarcinoma |
HTB-37 |
|
HeLa |
Epithelial |
Human cervical carcinoma |
CRM-CCL-2 |
|
SiHa |
Epithelial |
Human cervical squamous cell carcinoma |
HTB-35 |
|
ARPE-19 |
Epithelial |
Human adult retinal pigmented epithelium |
CRL-2302 |
Isolates were cultured from the original cervical swabs from women using a series of culture steps to attain sufficient culture for these experiments (six to 12 passages depending on the isolate). Stocks were stored and propagated from SPG buffer which consisted of 5 mM glutamic acid, 10 mM sodium phosphate and 250 mM sucrose balanced to pH 7.4. The five clinical isolates used in this study are detailed in Table 2.
Table 2.
Identification and details of the clinical isolates used in this study
|
ACTS code (code) |
ompA genotype |
Clinical outcome |
|---|---|---|
|
600 (1) |
K |
Repeat infection, first detection |
|
600 (13) |
K |
Repeat infection, second detection |
|
620 (1) |
D |
No repeat infection |
|
628 (1) |
E |
No repeat infection |
|
649 (1) |
K |
No repeat infection, genotypically close to 600 (1) |
Infectivity and determination of viable progeny
McCoy B, MCF-7, CACO-2, HeLa, SiHa and ARPE-19 cells were cultured in 96-well plates, in triplicate for each condition and experimental analysis conducted. Cells were infected with each of the five clinical isolates and type strain D/UW-3/Cx at an m.o.i. of 0.5. Cultures were immediately centrifuged at 500 g and 37 °C for 30 min, then incubated under standard conditions (37 °C, 5 % CO2). At 4 h post-infection (h PI), the infectious medium in each well was replaced with complete DMEM supplemented with 1 µg ml−1 cycloheximide before further incubation. To determine the infectivity of the isolates in each cell line, cultures were fixed with 100 % methanol at 30 h PI for evaluation by immunofluorescence and microscopy. Infectious progeny counts (inclusion-forming units, IFU) of each isolate was determined from cultures harvested at 44 and 54 h of infection. Inclusion-forming units were determined by serially diluting stocks from each of the harvested cultures onto fresh cultures of McCoy B cells, which were fixed at 30 h PI for evaluation by immunocytochemistry.
ompA genotyping
DNA was extracted from the original swab samples collected (as per the ACTS protocol) and swirled in 500 µl of PBS solution. A 200 µl aliquot of the swab/PBS homogenate was extracted using the MagNA Pure 96 (Roche Applied Science) automated system, according to the manufacturer’s instructions and utilizing the MagNA Pure 96 DNA and Viral NA Small Volume Kit, and eluted in 100 µl in MagNA Pure 96 elution buffer [11].
All C. trachomatis genotype determinations utilized a 5 µl aliquot of PBS swab homogenate elution, utilizing a series of quantitative PCR (qPCR) amplification assays targeting the ompA gene of C. trachomatis as described previously [37].
Penicillin and iron deprivation persistence models
Persistence models were conducted in MCF-7 cells. In total, 2.5×104 MCF-7 cell monolayers cultured for 24 h were infected at an m.o.i. of 0.8 (slighly higher than the previous cultures due to expected loss of some organisms in the persistence model). Cultures were immediately centrifuged at 500 g and 37 °C for 30 min, then incubated under standard conditions (37 °C, 5 % CO2, 95 % air). At 4 h PI, the infectious medium in each well was replaced with complete DMEM supplemented with 1 µg ml−1 cycloheximide as well as 0, 0.02, 0.05 or 1.0 U ml−1 benzylpenicillin (Pen G). 2,2′-Bipyridyl (Bpdl) was used in accordance with the methods previously outlined by Thomson and Carabeo (doses of 400 µM) [38]. Cultures were incubated until 44 h PI, when they were harvested and stocked in SPG for analysis of inclusion-forming units, or washed and media replaced with fresh media without the penicillin or supplemented with FeCl3 until 96 or 110 h PI of culture and stocked in SPG. The infectious yield of all cultures at each of the time points was determined by infecting serial dilutions of stored stocks into monolayers of McCoy B cells using the standard protocol, and cultures were fixed with methanol at approximately 30 h PI, before immunocytochemistry and visualization by fluorescence microscopy. Cultures for infectivity yields were routinely conducted in 96- or 48-well plates, and replicate cultures were conducted in 24-well plates on top of 1.5 mm coverslips for the cases where fixing, immunocytochemistry and imaging by microscopy to eludicate phenotype were part of the experiment. Azithromycin treatment was conducted to determine each isolate's MIC using the methodology previously outlined [39]; each isolate's MIC dose was then used to treat the isolate during and in the absence of the persistence inducing conditions to evaluate if the isolate’s capacity to survive the antibiotic treatment at the MIC changed by being in persistence.
Immunofluorescence microscopy
Cultures were fixed with methanol, permeabilized with triton X-100 (0.5%) in Dulbecco’s PBS (dPBS) and blocked with 1 % BSA in dPBS overnight. Once blocked, cultures were then further incubated with dPBS containing 4′,6-diamino-2-phenyindole (DAPI; 1:40 000) and rabbit sera (1:500) containing antibodies raised against the C. trachomatis high-temperature requirement A (HtrA) protein for 1 h at room temperature (antibody and protocol as previously described [40, 41]). Following this, cultures were washed four times with dPBS containing 0.2 % tween 20, and then incubated with dPBS containing an Alexa Fluor 488-conjugated goat anti-rabbit antibody (1:600; Thermo Fisher Scientific) for 45 min at room temperature. The stained cultures were then washed five times more with the dPBS tween solution. Cultures on 13 mm (No. 1.5) coverslips were stained and labelled using the same process, with the addition of a mouse anti-α-tubulin (1:500; Thermo Fisher Scientific) in the first antibody incubation, and an Alexa Fluor 546-conjugated goat anti-mouse antibody (1:600; Thermo Fisher Scientific) in the second incubation. Stained coverslips were mounted to clear glass slides using n-propyl gallate (NPG) and sealed using clear varnish around the edge of the coverslip. Stained and labelled plate cultures were visualized and imaged using a Nikon Eclipse Ti-S fluorescence microscope or GE InCell 3000 high-throughput fluorescence microscope. Coverslips were visualized and imaged using a Nikon Eclipse Ti-E confocal microscope.
Data analysis and graphing
Raw data were compiled using Microsoft Excel 2010 before being transferred into GraphPad Prism version 8.0.0 for Windows for statistical analysis and graphing, with each value and any applicable statistical testing described in the respective figure legends.
Results
Clinical isolates differed in infectivity and growth more profoundly than the differences caused by the cell lines
Six cell lines were selected, to compare how susceptible they were to infection by four of the clinical isolates, and the type strain D/UW-3/Cx (Fig. 1). The human mammary epithelial cell line (MCF-7) was found to result in the highest cell infection levels after exposure to the chlamydial strains for each of the four clinical isolates, with 35–40 % of all counted cells becoming infected. Both the retinal cell line (ARPE-19) and cervical carcinoma cell line (SiHa) were observed to have the lowest percentage of infectivity (5–10 %) for all four clinical isolates, while the type strain was observed to still have produced inclusions in 25–30 % in both these lines. The proposed 0.5 infectivity or m.o.i. was calculated from an IFU ml−1 yield in McCoy B cells. While the type strain showed a similar level of infectivity across the McCoy B, MCF-7, HeLa and SiHa lines, it did show slightly lower levels in CACO-2 and ARPE-19. The same six cell lines used for the infectivity assay were infected and harvested at two time points, to determine the number of infectious progeny that had been produced during the developmental period. All four isolates produced the most infectious progeny (IFU ml−1) in the McCoy B cell line (Fig. 1). For example, clinical isolate 600 (1) grown in McCoy B cells yielded 1.2×106 IFU ml−1 at 44 h PI, while in HeLa cells, it yielded 3.7×104 IFU ml−1. Similarly, the type strain produced higher levels of progeny in the McCoy B cells (9.8×106), in CACO-2 (9.4×106) and HeLa cells (7.1×106), compared to MCF-7 (1.1×106) and SiHa (1.9×106) cells, and ~100-fold fewer in ARPE-19 cells (5.9×104). The ARPE-19 cell line was also shown to produce the least number of infectious progeny for clinical isolates, with all four showing no detectable progeny. Less variation in the infectivity and infectious progeny production from each of the clinical isolates was observed in the SiHa cell lines compared to the other cell lines (Fig. 1).
Fig. 1.
Infectivity and infectious progeny yield in different cell types for the clinical isolates. The figure shows the inclusion forming units (IFU) yielded (left y axis) from each isolate (orange indicates yields at 44 h PI and blue indicates yields at 54 h PI) and the percentage infectivity at 30 h PI (right y axis, green bar). Each cell line analysed includes (a) McCoy B, (b) Hela, (c) MCF-7, (d) SiHa, (e) APRE-19 and (f) CACO2. The bars for IFU ml−1 include a total of n=27 representative images to determine the mean of a minimum of n=3 separate experimental replicates, shown with standard deviation. The bars for percentage infectivity are representative of n=9 experimental replicates. The data are shown from a single experiment, and are consistent with other similar experiments.
Clinical isolates show similar susceptibilities to conditions of iron deprivation at lower doses than type strain D/UW-3/Cx
To more closely examine if persistence phenotypes were impacted by ompA genotypes, and the known outcomes in participants in the ACTS trial, an additional isolate was included in these persistence experiments to have a close genotype to the isolate from a participant who experienced repeat infection. Five clinical isolates and the type strain were cultivated in MCF-7 cells, treated with 100, 200 (D/UW-3/Cx only) and 400 µM bipyridal (Bpdl)±100 µM iron as FeCl3, with infectious progeny determined at 96 h PI. As seen in Fig. 2a, the type strain was able to recover from up to 100 µM Bpdl (7.1×104 IFU ml−1 before recovery) with the supplementation of FeCl3 into culture (3.1×108 IFU ml−1 after recovery). The five clinical isolates showed lower recovery, even from the lowest dose of Bpdl, as seen in Fig. 2. For example (Fig. 2c), at the 100 µM dose of Bpdl with and without recovery, 600(13) yielded 3.1×103 and 7.0×102 IFU ml−1 (near the limit of detection for this assay) respectively. All five isolates produced infectious progeny in a manner that was dose-dependent, with slightly lower levels of infectious progeny present in cultures treated with 400 µM than those treated with 100 µM.
Fig. 2.
Iron deprivation-related persistence and recovery of the clinical isolates. The graphs show the infectious progeny produced by type strain D/UW-3/Cx (a) and five clinical isolates [(b): 600 (1); (c): 600 (13); (d) 1-020 (1); (e) 628 (1); (f) 649 (1)] in MCF-7 cells treated with Bpdl±100 µM iron as FeCl3 for recovery. Each bar represents the mean of three experimental replicates analysed using n=10 separate fields of view from n=3 experimental replicates with error bars showing the standard error of the mean (sem). Data were analysed by a three-way ANOVA using GraphPad Prism version 8.0.0 for Windows. Significant differences are indicated by ****P<0.0001. The data are shown from a single experiment, and are consistent with other similar experiments.
Treatment with azithromycin during iron deprivation-induced persistence decreases the number of recoverable infectious progeny among clinical isolates
Each of the five clinical isolates and the type strain were cultured in MCF-7 cells treated with Bpdl, subsequently treated with azithromycin (Az), and then recovered with supplementation of iron. The azithromycin dose used was the MIC that had been determined for each isolate. The MICs were as follows: 600 (1): 0.032 µg ml−1, 600 (13): 0.125 µg ml−1, 620: 0.032 µg ml−1, 628 : 0.064 µg ml−1; 649 : 0.064 µg ml−1, and D/UW-3/Cx: 0.064 µg ml−1. All strains showed a significant decrease in infectious progeny at 44 h PI when treated with azithromycin, Bpdl or both (Fig. 3, P<0001). Compared to the untreated control at 44 h PI (5.4×105 IFU ml−1), D/UW-3/Cx showed an impaired ability to recover from the effects of Bpdl when also treated with azithromycin (2.9×104 IFU ml−1), even with iron supplementation (5.0×102 IFU ml−1). Compared to their respective untreated controls at 44 h PI (Fig. 3), all five clinical isolates were found to have only slight differences in their resulting infectious yield when treated with the combinations of azithromycin, Bpdl and FeCl3. For example, the untreated control 600 (13) culture produced 2.2×104 compared to only 1.5×103 IFU ml−1 after treatment and recovery. Analysis of the cultures by confocal microscopy showed morphologies consistent with persistence, as inclusions visible were consistent with persistence after treatment with penicillin; regular development occurred after allowing for recovery from the drug (Fig. 4, representative images from some isolates).
Fig. 3.
Iron deprivation-induced persistence and recovery of the chlamydial isolates. Infectious progeny (IFU, y axis) produced by the type strain D/UW-3/Cx (a) and five clinical isolates [(b): 600(1); (c) 600(13); (d) 620 (1); (e) 628(1); (f) 649(1)] in MCF-7 cells treated with Bpdl, Az±100 µM iron as FeCl3 for recovery. Azithromycin dose was the MIC for the strain; 600 (1): 0.032 µg ml−1, 600 (13): 0.125 µg ml−1, 620 : 0.032 µg ml−1, 628 : 0.064 µg ml−1; 649 : 0.064 µg ml−1, and D/UW-3/Cx: 0.064 µg ml−1. Each bar represents the mean of three experimental replicates analysed using n=10 separate fields of view from n=3 subsequent infectivity (passage) wells with error bars showing sem. Data were analysed by a three-way ANOVA using GraphPad Prism version 8.0.0 for Windows. Significant differences are indicated by ****P<0.0001 and *P=0.0138. The data are shown from a single experiment, and are consistent with other similar experiments.
Fig. 4.
Confocal microscopy of Chlamydia cultures during iron-deprivation persistence. MCF7 cells infected with 620 (1) (top two rows) or type strain D/UW-3/Cx (bottom two rows) were fixed and visualized using immunofluorescence. Active and persistent inclusions containing chlamydial HtrA appear as green, while the host alpha-tubulin appears as red and the host cell nucleus as blue. These images are representatives of observations for each experimental condition.
Clinical isolates entered persistence at lower doses of penicillin compared to the type strain
Several doses of penicillin were used to induce persistence in each strain, which was confirmed by measuring viability before and after recovery from the drug. The data shown in Fig. 5 demonstrate that compared to the untreated controls at 44 h PI, the addition of 0.02 U ml−1 penicillin slightly impacted the development of each clinical isolate, while the 0.05 and 1.0 U ml−1 doses had rendered them non-cultivable. Conversely, only the 1.0 U ml−1 dose caused the type strain to enter persistence, with far less pronounced effects than the clinical isolates prevalent at the lower doses. Isolates 600 (1) and 600 (13) produced 2.1×106 and 5.5×105 IFU ml−1 in their respective untreated cultures, compared to 6.6×105 and 8.7×104 IFU ml−1 in the cultures treated with the lowest dose of penicillin. The type strain exhibited only slightly impacted growth at both the lower doses (5.0×107 IFU ml−1 untreated versus 4.1×106 and 9.4×104 IFU ml−1 at 0.02 and 0.05 U ml−1, respectively), and only became non-cultivable at the 1.0 U ml−1 dose. Each of the five clinical isolates and the type strain were able to produce detectable (after recovery) infectious progeny by 110 h PI, all to a similar level, even after treatment with 1 U ml−1 of penicillin. Confocal microscopy examination of the morphology of the cultures confirmed the presence of visible forms consistent with persistent or recovered morphology (Fig. 6). Specifically, at 44 and 110 h PI and in the absence of penicillin, each of the five clinical isolates and the type strain showed typical morphologies consistent with regular development. At the same time point, cultures treated with penicillin showed significantly smaller inclusions with enlarged particles inside, morphologies consistent with persistence. Imaging of the cultures at 110 h PI (66 h after the removal of penicillin from culture) showed inclusions typical of regular inclusions.
Fig. 5.
Enumeration of infectious progeny from penicillin persistence experiments. IFUs from culture harvested at 44 and 110 h PI are shown on the graph(s). The IFU ml–1 (y axis, log scale), and dose of penicillin (x axis), and recoverable IFU ml–1 at 44 h PI (blue bars, during persistence), and 110 h PI (red bars, recovery). Data shown represent the mean value of n=3 separate experimental replicates wells with n=10 images analysed from each of n=3 wells, with error bars representative of the sem. The data are shown from a single experiment and are consistent with other similar experiments. These data were used to select the dose of penicillin G for the next experiments for each isolate and as such were not used for statistical analysis.
Fig. 6.
Confocal microscopy of the chlamydial cultures in the presence and absence of penicillin and post-recovery. Active and persistent inclusions containing chlamydial HtrA appear as green, while the host alpha-tubulin appears as red and the host cell nucleus as blue. These images are representatives of observations for each experimental condition.
Clinical isolates treated with azithromycin during penicillin persistence showed a dose-dependent decrease in recoverable infectious progeny
To assess whether clinical isolates had altered susceptibilities to azithromycin during persistence, three clinical isolates and D/UW-3/Cx were cultured in MCF-7 cells and treated with both penicillin and azithromycin. Persistence was induced using 0.05 U ml−1 of penicillin for the three clinical isolates and 1.0 U ml−1 for the type strain. At 44 h PI, Fig. 7 shows a complete loss of infectious progeny for the penicillin-treated cultures, which was recoverable (albeit reduced) by 110 h PI. The infectious progeny of the four strains at 44 h PI was also observed to decrease by up to 100-fold when treated with azithromycin alone. In the type strain, this effect was also seen, whereby the recoverable infectious progeny decreased in the presence of azithromycin only, with a complete loss of viability at 44 h PI when both azithromycin and penicillin were added. However, no statistical differences were apparent for any isolates treated with azithromycin during penicillin persistence. It appeared that the recovery of the clinical isolates from persistence was further reduced when treated with azithromycin at the MIC, with two of the isolates [600 (13) and 649] appearing to be more impacted by the combination treatment.
Fig. 7.
Impact of azithromycin treatment during penicillin-induced persistence. The graphs show the IFU ml–1 of each clinical isolate and type strain D/UW-3/Cx in the presence of azithromycin (at the MIC for that strain), with and without pretreatment and recovery from benzylpenicillin. Azithromycin dose; 600 (1): 0.032 µg ml−1, 600 (13): 0.125 µg ml−1, 620 :0.032 µg ml−1, 628 : 0.064 µg ml−1; 649 : 0.064 µg ml−1, and D/UW-3/Cx: 0.064 µg ml−1. The x axis shows each isolate grouped at both time points on the left- and right-hand sides respectively and the y axis shows infectivity of the cultures as IFU ml−1. Data shown represent the mean value of n=3 separate experimental replicate wells with an average of n=10 images analysed to input the result for each of n=3 wells, with error bars representative of the sem. The data are shown from a single experiment, but are consistent with other similar experiments. The P values for the significant different outcomes for the isolates are as follows (left to right): 0.043, 0.099, 0.066, 0.027, 0.0066.
Discussion
The susceptibility and growth permissiveness of different cell lines to infection by C. trachomatis enables examination of the host–pathogen relationship [42–45]. Such studies frequently find differences between strains in their ability to enter the host cell, and complete their developmental cycle [46]. The infectivity of the clinical isolates in the present study was observed to be highest in the MCF-7 cell line, despite the long-standing practice throughout the field of using McCoy or HeLa cells for cultivation and isolation of C. trachomatis , especially from clinical samples [47–49]. However, infectious yields were highest in the McCoy B cell line for each of the strains tested. The ARPE-19 cell line was observed to have a very low susceptibility to infection by, and permissiveness of growth to, all strains except D/UW-3/Cx, yet was nonetheless able to be infected by each of the strains, even though it is not an epithelial cell type. The inability to detect progeny from this cell line for the clinical isolates may reflect the low yields being below detection of the assay, or that the clinical isolates in these cells are unable to form infectious elementary bodies. Overall, these findings reinforce that there are phenotypic differences between type strains and clinical isolates that probably reflect the adaptation of D/UW-3/Cx to growth in vitro [50].
Although it has been shown that type strains of C. trachomatis have varying levels of susceptibility to the in vitro effects of IFN-γ, fewer studies have examined how different strains respond to penicillin or iron deprivation [51]. In this study, we aimed to determine how clinical isolates respond to such conditions. Both were selected on the basis that penicillin has been used widely as a chlamydial persistence model, so our findings can be interpreted in light of other studies [36, 52–54]; iron deprivation is potentially a more clinically relevant model when considering the physiology of the female reproductive tract [55–57]. Penicillin is known to induce persistence by interacting with chlamydial penicillin-binding proteins (PBPs), while host cell-derived iron is essential for chlamydial development. Both points combined raise the possibility that genetic variation among infecting strains could result in differing thresholds at which they divert from the regular developmental cycle into persistence.
To assess the susceptibility of each strain to penicillin, they were treated with a dose range in MCF-7 cells. None of the clinical strains showed any notable difference in their levels of susceptibility to penicillin persistence, with all entering a viable but non-cultivable state at 0.05 U ml−1 of the antibiotic. In contrast, the type strain D/UW-3/Cx remained cultivable up to the maximum dose used, which was 1 U ml−1. A recent study into the effects of beta-lactam antibiotics on C. trachomatis showed that type strain E/UW-3/Cx entered persistence at 0.02 U ml−1 of benzylpenicillin [36]. Although using different host cells, this suggests there may be different susceptibilities among type strains.
Similarly, there were no large observed differences in the responses of clinical isolates to the effects of iron deprivation. In a recent review, Pokorzynski and colleagues postulated a complex system by which C. trachomatis may be able to both passively and actively acquire ferrous and ferric iron from within the host cytoplasm by modulating the host's own iron trafficking pathways [58]. As with other instances of chlamydial persistence, it is possible that strain differences may in turn result in slight differences in the proteins that conduct these functions.
The effects of azithromycin were tested on a selection of clinical isolates during both active and persistent development. We observed no differences in the susceptibilities of active and persistent infections, in any of the clinical strains tested. Previous findings by the Caldwell group demonstrate that during IFN-γ-mediated persistence, a serovar D type strain of C. trachomatis is significantly more susceptible to azithromycin [35]. However, Wyrick and Knight have shown that a serovar E type strain is less susceptible to the same antibiotic during penicillin-mediated persistence [52]. This reinforces previous findings that different inducers of persistence produce different phenotypes [59], which probably reflects the physiological stress the inducer places upon C. trachomatis .
Collectively these findings show that clinical isolates respond to the effects of penicillin, iron deprivation and azithromycin in a similar but more pronounced way than type strain D/UW-3/Cx. This is important because these are recent clinical isolates, indicating that persistence may occur more frequently and with lower thresholds in vivo. Here we demonstrated that clinical isolates showed subtle variation in thresholds for persistence that may be more distinct and impactful in the complex in vivo environment. These variations may translate into phenotypes in vivo that could relate to heterogenic survival of antibiotic treatment, or different capacities to survive in different tissue niches (e.g. rectal compared to urogenital) that could be relevant for future investigation of chlamydial variation.
Funding information
This study and ACTS was funded by a National Health and Medical Research Council project grant (APP1023239), awarded to J.H., P.T., W.H. and others.
Acknowledgements
The ACTS investigators include Marcus Y. Chen, Karen Worthington, Ruthy McIver, Sepehr N. Tabrizi, Basil, Donovan, Christopher Fairley, John Kaldor, Malcolm McConville, Anna McNulty and David Regan.
Author contributions
M.T., Investigation, Writing, original data preparation, and review and editing. S.K., Investigation, Writing, original data preparation. A.L., Investigation, Writing, original data preparation. L.V., Investigation, Writing, original data preparation. S.P., Investigation, Writing, original data preparation. J.H., Supervision, Investigation, Writing, original data preparation, and review and editing. P.T., Supervision, Investigation, Writing, original data preparation, and review and editing. W.H., Conceptualization, Supervision, Investigation, Writing, original data preparation, and review and editing.
Conflicts of interest
The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest.
Ethical statement
Ethical approval for this study was granted by the Alfred Hospital Ethics Committee (HREC No. 223/12) and the Southern Eastern Sydney Local Health District Human Research Ethics Committee (Southern Sector) (HREC No. 12/143).
Footnotes
Abbreviations: ACTS, Australian Chlamydia Treatment Study; BpdI, 2,2′-Bipyridyl; MIC, minimum inhibitory concentration.
References
- 1.Craig AP, Bavoil PM, Rank RG, Wilson DP. Biomathematical Modeling of Chlamydia Infection and Disease. Intracellular Pathogens I: Chlamydiales. American Society of Microbiology; 2012. [Google Scholar]
- 2.Menon S, Timms P, Allan JA, Alexander K, Rombauts L, et al. Human and pathogen factors associated with Chlamydia trachomatis-related infertility in women. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2015;28:969–985. doi: 10.1128/CMR.00035-15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Callan T, Debattista J, Berry B, Brown J, Woodcock S, et al. A retrospective cohort study examining STI testing and perinatal records demonstrates reproductive health burden of Chlamydia and gonorrhea. Pathog Dis. 2020;78 doi: 10.1093/femspd/ftaa052. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Reekie J, Donovan B, Guy R, Hocking JS, Kaldor JM, et al. Risk of ectopic pregnancy and tubal infertility following gonorrhoea and Chlamydia infections. Clin Infect Dis. 2019 doi: 10.1093/cid/ciz145. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Reekie J, Donovan B, Guy R, Hocking JS, Kaldor JM, et al. Risk of pelvic inflammatory disease in relation to Chlamydia and gonorrhea testing, repeat testing, and positivity: a population-based cohort study. Clin Infect Dis. 2018;66:437–443. doi: 10.1093/cid/cix769. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Geisler WM, Uniyal A, Lee JY, Lensing SY, Johnson S, et al. Azithromycin versus doxycycline for urogenital Chlamydia trachomatis infection. N Engl J Med. 2015;373:2512–2521. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1502599. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Kong FYS, Tabrizi SN, Law M, Vodstrcil LA, Chen M, et al. Azithromycin versus doxycycline for the treatment of genital Chlamydia infection: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Clin Infect Dis. 2014;59:193–205. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciu220. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Zhanel GG, Dueck M, Hoban DJ, Vercaigne LM, Embil JM, et al. Review of macrolides and ketolides: focus on respiratory tract infections. Drugs. 2001;61:443–498. doi: 10.2165/00003495-200161040-00003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Carlier MB, Garcia-Luque I, Montenez JP, Tulkens PM, Piret J. Accumulation, release and subcellular localization of azithromycin in phagocytic and non-phagocytic cells in culture. Int J Tissue React. 1994;16:211–220. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Bavoil PM. What’s in a word: the use, misuse, and abuse of the word "persistence" in Chlamydia biology. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2014;4:27. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2014.00027. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Hocking JS, Vodstrcil LA, Huston WM, Timms P, Chen MY, et al. A cohort study of Chlamydia trachomatis treatment failure in women: a study protocol. BMC Infect Dis. 2013;13:379. doi: 10.1186/1471-2334-13-379. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Weisblum B. Erythromycin resistance by ribosome modification. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1995;39:577–585. doi: 10.1128/AAC.39.3.577. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Shkarupeta MM, Lazarev VN, Akopian TA, Afrikanova TS, Govorun VM. Analysis of antibiotic resistance markers in Chlamydia trachomatis clinical isolates obtained after ineffective antibiotic therapy. Bull Exp Biol Med. 2007;143:713–717. doi: 10.1007/s10517-007-0221-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Bhengraj AR, Srivastava P, Mittal A. Lack of mutation in macrolide resistance genes in Chlamydia trachomatis clinical isolates with decreased susceptibility to azithromycin. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2011;38:178–179. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2011.03.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Hong KC, Schachter J, Moncada J, Zhou Z, House J, et al. Lack of macrolide resistance in Chlamydia trachomatis after mass azithromycin distributions for trachoma. Emerg Infect Dis. 2009;15:1088–1090. doi: 10.3201/eid1507.081563. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Ljubin-Sternak S, Mestrovic T, Vilibic-Cavlek T, Mlinaric-Galinovic G, Sviben M, et al. In vitro susceptibility of urogenital Chlamydia trachomatis strains in a country with high azithromycin consumption rate. Folia Microbiol. 2013;58:361–365. doi: 10.1007/s12223-012-0218-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Misyurina OY, Chipitsyna EV, Finashutina YP, Lazarev VN, Akopian TA, et al. Mutations in a 23S rRNA gene of Chlamydia trachomatis associated with resistance to macrolides. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2004;48:1347–1349. doi: 10.1128/AAC.48.4.1347-1349.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Zhu H, Wang H-P, Jiang Y, Hou S-P, Liu Y-J, et al. Mutations in 23S rRNA and ribosomal protein L4 account for resistance in Chlamydia trachomatis strains selected in vitro by macrolide passage. Andrologia. 2010;42:274–280. doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0272.2009.01019.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Binet R, Maurelli AT. Frequency of development and associated physiological cost of azithromycin resistance in Chlamydia psittaci 6BC and C. trachomatis L2. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2007;51:4267–4275. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00962-07. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Hokynar K, Rantakokko-Jalava K, Hakanen A, Havana M, Mannonen L, et al. The finnish new variant of Chlamydia trachomatis with a single nucleotide polymorphism in the 23S rRNA target escapes detection by the APTIMA Combo 2 test. Microorganisms. 2019;7:227. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms7080227. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Bonner CA, Byrne GI, Jensen RA. Chlamydia exploit the mammalian tryptophan-depletion defense strategy as a counter-defensive cue to trigger a survival state of persistence. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2014;4:17. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2014.00017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Chacko A, Barker CJ, Beagley KW, Hodson MP, Plan MR, et al. Increased sensitivity to tryptophan bioavailability is a positive adaptation by the human strains of C hlamydia pneumoniae . Mol Microbiol. 2014;93:797–813. doi: 10.1111/mmi.12701. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Beatty WL, Byrne GI, Morrison RP. Morphologic and antigenic characterization of interferon gamma-mediated persistent Chlamydia trachomatis infection in vitro . Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1993;90:3998–4002. doi: 10.1073/pnas.90.9.3998. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Harper A, Pogson CI, Jones ML, Pearce JH. Chlamydial development is adversely affected by minor changes in amino acid supply, blood plasma amino acid levels, and glucose deprivation. Infect Immun. 2000;68:1457–1464. doi: 10.1128/IAI.68.3.1457-1464.2000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Kokab A, Jennings R, Eley A, Pacey AA, Cross NA. Analysis of modulated gene expression in a model of interferon-gamma-induced persistence of Chlamydia trachomatis in HEp-2 cells. Microb Pathog. 2010;49:217–225. doi: 10.1016/j.micpath.2010.06.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Matsumoto A, Manire GP. Electron microscopic observations on the effects of penicillin on the morphology of Chlamydia psittaci . J Bacteriol. 1970;101:278–285. doi: 10.1128/JB.101.1.278-285.1970. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Belland RJ, Nelson DE, Virok D, Crane DD, Hogan D, et al. Transcriptome analysis of chlamydial growth during IFN-gamma-mediated persistence and reactivation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003;100:15971–15976. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2535394100. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Wyrick PB. Chlamydia trachomatis Persistence In Vitro: An Overview. J Infect Dis. 2010;201:88–95. doi: 10.1086/652394. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Witkin SS, Minis E, Athanasiou A, Leizer J, Linhares IM. Chlamydia trachomatis: the Persistent Pathogen. Clin Vaccine Immunol. 2017;24:e00203–00217. doi: 10.1128/CVI.00203-17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Raulston JE. Response of Chlamydia trachomatis serovar E to iron restriction in vitro and evidence for iron-regulated chlamydial proteins. Infect Immun. 1997;65:4539–4547. doi: 10.1128/IAI.65.11.4539-4547.1997. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Dill BD, Dessus-Babus S, Raulston JE. Identification of iron-responsive proteins expressed by Chlamydia trachomatis reticulate bodies during intracellular growth. Microbiology. 2009;155:210–219. doi: 10.1099/mic.0.022731-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Nairz M, Fritsche G, Brunner P, Talasz H, Hantke K, et al. Interferon‐γ limits the availability of iron for intramacrophage Salmonella typhimurium . Eur J Immunol. 2008;38:1923–1936. doi: 10.1002/eji.200738056. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Shima K, Klinger M, Solbach W, Rupp J. Activities of first-choice antimicrobials against gamma interferon-treated Chlamydia trachomatis differ in hypoxia. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2013;57:2828–2830. doi: 10.1128/AAC.02211-12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Reveneau N, Crane DD, Fischer E, Caldwell HD. Bactericidal activity of first-choice antibiotics against gamma interferon-induced persistent infection of human epithelial cells by Chlamydia trachomatis . Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2005;49:1787–1793. doi: 10.1128/AAC.49.5.1787-1793.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Perry LL, Su H, Feilzer K, Messer R, Hughes S, et al. Differential sensitivity of distinct Chlamydia trachomatis isolates to IFN-gamma-mediated inhibition. Journal of immunology. 1999;162:3541–3548. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Kintner J, Lajoie D, Hall J, Whittimore J, Schoborg RV. Commonly prescribed β-lactam antibiotics induce C. trachomatis persistence/stress in culture at physiologically relevant concentrations. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2014;4:44. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2014.00044. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Stevens MP, Twin J, Fairley CK, Donovan B, Tan SE, et al. Development and evaluation of an ompA quantitative real-time PCR assay for Chlamydia trachomatis serovar determination. J Clin Microbiol. 2010;48:2060–2065. doi: 10.1128/JCM.02308-09. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Thompson CC, Carabeo RA. An optimal method of iron starvation of the obligate intracellular pathogen, Chlamydia trachomatis . Front Microbiol. 2011;2:20. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2011.00020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Suchland RJ, Geisler WM, Stamm WE. Methodologies and cell lines used for antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Chlamydia spp. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2003;47:636–642. doi: 10.1128/AAC.47.2.636-642.2003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Huston WM, Swedberg JE, Harris JM, Walsh TP, Mathews SA, et al. The temperature activated HtrA protease from pathogen Chlamydia trachomatis acts as both a chaperone and protease at 37 °C. FEBS Lett. 2007;581:3382–3386. doi: 10.1016/j.febslet.2007.06.039. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Huston WM, Theodoropoulos C, Mathews SA, Timms P. Chlamydia trachomatis responds to heat shock, penicillin induced persistence, and IFN-gamma persistence by altering levels of the extracytoplasmic stress response protease HtrA. BMC Microbiol. 2008;8:190. doi: 10.1186/1471-2180-8-190. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Fudyk T, Olinger L, Stephens RS. Selection of mutant cell lines resistant to infection by Chlamydia trachomatis and Chlamydia pneumoniae . Infect Immun. 2002;70:6444–6447. doi: 10.1128/IAI.70.11.6444-6447.2002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Kägebein D, Gutjahr M, Große C, Vogel AB, Rödel J, et al. Chlamydia trachomatis-infected epithelial cells and fibroblasts retain the ability to express Surface-Presented major histocompatibility complex class I molecules. Infect Immun. 2014;82:993–1006. doi: 10.1128/IAI.01473-13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Rota TR. Chlamydia trachomatis in cell culture. II. susceptibility of seven established mammalian cell types in vitro. adaptation of trachoma organisms to McCoy and BHK-21 cells. In vitro. 1977;13:280–292. doi: 10.1007/BF02616172. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Croy TR, Kuo CC, Wang SP. Comparative susceptibility of eleven mammalian cell lines to infection with trachoma organisms. J Clin Microbiol. 1975;1:434–439. doi: 10.1128/JCM.1.5.434-439.1975. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Chen JC-R, Stephens RS. Trachoma and LGV biovars of Chlamydia trachomatis share the same glycosaminoglycan-dependent mechanism for infection of eukaryotic cells. Mol Microbiol. 1994;11:501–507. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.1994.tb00331.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Sompolinsky D, Richmond S. Growth of Chlamydia trachomatis in McCoy cells treated with cytochalasin B. Appl Microbiol. 1974;28:912–914. doi: 10.1128/AM.28.6.912-914.1974. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Ripa KT, Mardh PA. Cultivation of Chlamydia trachomatis in cycloheximide-treated mccoy cells. J Clin Microbiol. 1977;6:328–331. doi: 10.1128/jcm.6.4.328-331.1977. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Sabet SF, Simmons J, Caldwell HD. Enhancement of Chlamydia trachomatis infectious progeny by cultivation of HeLa 229 cells treated with DEAE-dextran and cycloheximide. J Clin Microbiol. 1984;20:217–222. doi: 10.1128/JCM.20.2.217-222.1984. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Borges V, Ferreira R, Nunes A, Sousa-Uva M, Abreu M, et al. Effect of long-term laboratory propagation on Chlamydia trachomatis genome dynamics. Infection, Gen Evol. 2013;17:23–32. doi: 10.1016/j.meegid.2013.03.035. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Morrison RP. Differential sensitivities of Chlamydia trachomatis strains to inhibitory effects of gamma interferon. Infect Immun. 2000;68:6038–6040. doi: 10.1128/IAI.68.10.6038-6040.2000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Wyrick PB, Knight ST. Pre-Exposure of infected human endometrial epithelial cells to penicillin in vitro renders Chlamydia trachomatis refractory to azithromycin. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2004;54:79–85. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkh283. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Lambden PR, Pickett MA, Clarke IN. The effect of penicillin on Chlamydia trachomatis DNA replication. Microbiology. 2006;152:2573–2578. doi: 10.1099/mic.0.29032-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Carrasco JA, Tan C, Rank RG, Hsia R-ching, Bavoil PM. Altered developmental expression of polymorphic membrane proteins in penicillin-stressed Chlamydia trachomatis . Cell Microbiol. 2011;13:1014–1025. doi: 10.1111/j.1462-5822.2011.01598.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.LaRue RW, Dill BD, Giles DK, Whittimore JD, Raulston JE. Chlamydial Hsp60-2 is iron responsive in Chlamydia trachomatis serovar E-Infected human endometrial epithelial cells in vitro. Infect Immun. 2007;75:2374–2380. doi: 10.1128/IAI.01465-06. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Thompson CC, Carabeo RA. An optimal method of iron starvation of the obligate intracellular pathogen, Chlamydia Trachomatis . Front Microbiol. 2011;2:20. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2011.00020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Al-Younes HM, Rudel T, Brinkmann V, Szczepek AJ, Meyer TF. Low iron availability modulates the course of Chlamydia pneumoniae infection. Cell Microbiol. 2001;3:427–437. doi: 10.1046/j.1462-5822.2001.00125.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Pokorzynski ND, Thompson CC, Carabeo RA. Ironing out the unconventional mechanisms of iron acquisition and gene regulation in Chlamydia. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2017;7:394. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2017.00394. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Mpiga P, Ravaoarinoro M. Chlamydia trachomatis persistence: An update. Microbiol Res. 2006;161:9–19. doi: 10.1016/j.micres.2005.04.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]







