Abstract
Objectives
To report Streptococcus pneumoniae serotyping and susceptibility data from a recent clinical trial (ML-3341-306) comparing delafloxacin with moxifloxacin in the treatment of adults with community-acquired bacterial pneumonia (CABP).
Methods
Serotyping and susceptibility testing were conducted on 142 baseline S. pneumoniae isolates recovered from subjects participating in a CABP clinical trial.
Results
Overall, 113/142 (79.6%) isolates were vaccine serotypes. 76.8% (109/142) of serotyped isolates were PPSV23 serotypes and 59.9% (85/142) of isolates were PCV13 serotypes. 15.5% (22/142) of serotyped isolates were serotypes not covered by either vaccine; 4.9% (7/142) of tested isolates were non-typeable. The most common serotypes were serotypes 3 (19.0%; 27/142), 19F (9.9%; 14/142) and 23F (7.0%; 10/142). All of the 142 isolates were susceptible to delafloxacin and moxifloxacin, 76.1% were susceptible to azithromycin and 71.8% were susceptible to penicillin. Multidrug resistance was found among 19A (4/5; 80%), 6A (1/4; 25%), 6B (1/4; 25%), 14 (1/4; 25%), 19F (1/14; 7.1%), and 23F serotypes (2/10; 20%), and among non-typeable S. pneumoniae isolates (1/7; 14.3%).
Conclusions
S. pneumoniae vaccine-targeted serotypes were the main cause of CABP in this Phase 3 CABP study. Fluoroquinolones including delafloxacin remain a good treatment option for CABP in adults caused by S. pneumoniae.
Introduction
Community-acquired bacterial pneumonia (CABP) is a major cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide, especially in older age groups.1 The predominant pathogen causing CABP is Streptococcus pneumoniae, but this pathogen can also invade normally sterile body sites such as the blood and meninges resulting in invasive pneumococcal disease (IPD).2 There are two types of polysaccharide vaccines available for preventing pneumococcal infections in adults. The 13-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV13) comprises 13 serotypes (1, 3, 4, 5, 6A, 6B, 7F, 9V, 14, 18C, 19A, 19F and 23F) and has been licensed in Europe since 2011 and in the US since 2012 for adults aged ≥50 years.3,4 The 23-valent pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine (PPSV23) comprises 23 serotypes and covers 11 serotypes not found in PCV13 (2, 8, 9N, 10A, 11A, 12F, 15B, 17F, 20, 22F and 33F).5 This vaccine has been available since 1983 but is reported to be less immunogenic, especially in older adults.6
In a 2019 United States (US) CDC report, US coverage of adults ≥65 years with any pneumococcal vaccine type was 62% (45% received PPSV23 and 30% received both PCV13 and PPSV23).7 In Europe, the use of PCV13 [with or without additional dose(s) of PPSV23] is favored.3 While the introduction of conjugated pneumococcal vaccines in both children and adults resulted in a significant decrease in IPD in adults ≥65 years in the US, this reduction in incidence stalled between 2014–17 and no further reduction in PCV13-type IPD incidence was observed among adults age ≥19 years in the US.7
Further, antibiotic resistance among S. pneumoniae isolates has been increasing. The commonly used macrolide class of antibiotics has been associated with high levels of pneumococcal resistance, approaching 50% in areas of North America and 66.8% in Asia.8,9
Delafloxacin is a novel fluoroquinolone antibiotic that possesses Gram-positive, Gram-negative, and atypical activity including activity against fluoroquinolone non-susceptible MRSA isolates.10 It offers flexibility of intravenous and oral treatment with no QT restrictions or phototoxicity11 as well as no major drug–drug interactions.12 Delafloxacin is FDA and EMA approved for treatment of patients with acute bacterial skin and soft tissue infections (ABSSSI) and CABP.12 The microbiological results of the Phase 3 CABP trial were previously reported,13,14 high eradication rates were observed for delafloxacin (92.7%) and moxifloxacin (93.9%) for patients with S. pneumoniae. In a Phase 3 CABP trial completed in 2018 comparing delafloxacin with moxifloxacin, in vitro susceptibility results for delafloxacin and comparator agents as well as S. pneumoniae serotypes were determined and are reported here.
Materials and methods
Microbiology
S. pneumoniae was isolated by culture of baseline specimens including sputum, bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL), nasopharyngeal (NP) swabs, or blood. For S. pneumoniae cultured from NP swabs, a concomitant lytA PCR value of ≥1000 gene copies/mL was required for the isolate to be considered a pathogen.15,16 Additional information regarding study design, efficacy endpoints, analysis sets, microbiological outcomes as well as a comparison of the diagnostic method yield for S. pneumoniae was previously reported.13 All isolates underwent susceptibility testing and serotyping (see below).
Susceptibility testing
Isolates were submitted to the central laboratory (Covance Laboratories, Indianapolis, IN, USA) for identification confirmation and susceptibility testing according to CLSI guidelines.17 For suspected S. pneumoniae isolates, optochin disc testing was performed. If the result was ≥10 mm, a bile solubility test was performed. If the result was <10 mm and/or negative for bile solubility, MALDI-TOF identification was employed. If the MALDI-TOF identification was found to be inadequate, a secondary identification system such as a Vitek 2 streptococci panel, API® Rapid ID 32 STREP strip (bioMérieux, Marcy l’Etoile, France), and/or manual biochemical(s) were employed. For delafloxacin, susceptibility interpretative criteria were applied using FDA breakpoints.18 For all comparators, CLSI susceptibility interpretative criteria were applied.19 Multidrug resistance was determined using the CLSI susceptibility interpretative criteria and as previously described.20
lytA PCR assay
The lytA PCR assay is a laboratory-developed test that targets the autolysin gene lytA, a single-copy gene that is carried by all pneumococcal strains.15,16 Sequences of the primers and probe and assay conditions were previously described, with NP swabs used as specimen types.21
S. pneumoniae serotyping
All S. pneumoniae isolates were serotyped by the Quellung reaction using Neufeld reagents (Statens Serum Institute, Copenhagen, Denmark) at Emory University. Non-typeable isolates were also tested by latex agglutination and confirmed to be non-typeable using Quellung antisera (results not shown). If the same serotype was isolated from multiple specimen types from the same subject, it was counted only once. If multiple serotypes were isolated from multiple specimen types from the same subject, an isolate serotype recovered from a BAL, sputum or blood specimen type was counted over an isolate serotype recovered from a nasopharyngeal swab specimen type.
Results
Patient demographics with culture-positive S. pneumoniae
A total of 859 adult patients from sites on four continents, including sites in the United States (0.7%), Europe (85.7%), Latin America (5.4%), and South Africa (8.3%), were enrolled. Patients had to meet entry criteria and to have radiological evidence as well as ≥2 clinical signs and symptoms of CABP, including cough, production of purulent sputum consistent with a bacterial infection, difficulty breathing (dyspnoea), and chest pain due to pneumonia. In addition, multiple laboratory diagnostic methods were employed including respiratory, or blood culture, PCR, serology, and urinary antigen tests. Using this methodology, (181/520; 34.8%) subjects in the microbiological ITT population had a definite diagnosis of CABP caused by S. pneumoniae.13,22
Among subjects with culture-positive S. pneumoniae, 65% (92/142) were male. In comparison, in the CABP study population overall, the percentage of subjects that were male was 57%.22 Among study participants with pneumococcal disease, the mean age was 57 years (range: 18–86 years). 37% of the subjects were ≥65 years of age (study population overall: 44.5%)22. 81.7% (n = 116) of the subjects with culture-positive S. pneumoniae were from Eastern Europe, which is similar to the overall geographic enrolment in the trial; the three most-represented countries overall were Ukraine (n = 24), Serbia (n = 23), and Romania (n = 19). It has been reported that Eastern European clinical trial sites enrol more subjects per site than North American sites, which was consistent with the enrolment observed in this clinical trial.23
Serotyping of S. pneumoniae strains
Of the 142 unique S. pneumoniae isolates, 135 (95.1%) were typeable and 38 different serotypes were identified. Thirty-five paired isolates were recovered from the NP swab and another source (sputum, blood or bronchoalveolar lavage), with 33 cases (94.3%) having an identical serotype. All 35 (100%) patients that had paired isolates also had a lytA qPCR result that met the pre-specified diagnostic threshold of ≥1000 genome copies/mL.15,16
Overall, 120/142 (84.5%) isolates were vaccine serotypes. 76.8% (109/142) of serotyped isolates were PPSV23 serotypes and 59.9% (85/142) of isolates were PCV13 serotypes. 15.5% (22/142) of serotyped isolates were serotypes not covered by either vaccine; 4.9% (7/142) of tested isolates were non-typeable. The most common serotypes were serotypes 3 (19.0%; 27/142), 19F (9.9%; 14/142) and 23F (7.0%; 10/142) (Figure 1).
Figure 1.
Serotype distribution of baseline S. pneumoniae isolates.
Overall, 66.2% (94/142) of the serotyped S. pneumoniae isolates were recovered from monomicrobial infections. Notably, of the three most common serotypes, a high proportion of 19F serotypes were isolated from a monomicrobial infection (92.9%; 13/14) while serotype 3 (63.0%; 17/27) and serotype 23F (40%; 4/10) were frequently isolated from polymicrobial infections. One serotype 3 and one serotype 23F were recovered from blood or bronchoalveolar lavage while no 19F serotypes were recovered from these sample types (Table 1).
Table 1.
Delafloxacin and comparator activity against S. pneumoniae serotypesa from blood and bronchoalveolar lavage
| Antibiotic | MIC50 (mg/L) | MIC90 (mg/L) | MIC range (mg/L) | Susceptible (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Delafloxacin | 0.015 | 0.015 | 0.008–0.015 | 100 |
| Moxifloxacin | 0.25 | 0.25 | 0.12–0.25 | 100 |
| Azithromycin | 0.25 | 0.25 | 0.12–>32 | 90.9 |
| Penicillinb | ≤0.03 | ≤0.03 | ≤0.03 | 100 |
| Clindamycin | 0.06 | 0.12 | 0.06–>32 | 90.9 |
| Ceftriaxone | 0.015 | 0.03 | 0.015–0.03 | 100 |
The S. pneumoniae serotypes and numbers of isolates were: 9N (n = 1); 18C (n = 1); 4 (n = 3); 1 (n = 2); 9V (n = 1); 23F (n = 1); 3 (n = 1); and 12F (n = 1).
CLSI oral penicillin breakpoints.20
Susceptibility testing results
For all 142 S. pneumoniae isolates, 100% were susceptible to delafloxacin and moxifloxacin, 76.1% were susceptible to azithromycin and 71.8% were susceptible to penicillin. For serotype 3, all isolates were susceptible to delafloxacin, moxifloxacin, azithromycin, and penicillin. In contrast, for serotype 19F, 85.7% of isolates were susceptible to azithromycin and only 14.3% were susceptible to penicillin. For serotype 23F, 40% (4/10) were susceptible to azithromycin and 50% (5/10) were susceptible to penicillin (Table 2). Multidrug resistance was found among 19A (4/5; 80%), 6A (1/4; 25%), 6B (1/4; 25%), 14 (1/4; 25%), 19F (1/14; 7.1%), 23F serotypes (2/10; 20%) and among non-typeable S. pneumoniae isolates (1/7; 14.3%). For isolates that were recovered from BAL or blood, greater susceptibility was observed compared with the S. pneumoniae isolates overall, however, this finding may be the result of the small number of isolates recovered from these sample types (Table 1).
Table 2.
Delafloxacin and comparator activity against S. pneumoniae serotypes
| Serotype/antibiotic | MIC50 (mg/L) | MIC90 (mg/L) | MIC range (mg/L) | Susceptible (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| All S. pneumoniae serotypes (n = 142) | ||||
| Delafloxacin | 0.015 | 0.015 | 0.004–0.03 | 100 |
| Moxifloxacin | 0.25 | 0.25 | 0.06–0.25 | 100 |
| Azithromycin | 0.25 | >32 | 0.06–>32 | 76.1 |
| Penicillina | ≤0.03 | 2 | ≤0.03–4 | 71.8 |
| Clindamycin | 0.06 | >32 | ≤0.015–>32 | 85.2 |
| Ceftriaxone | 0.015 | 0.5 | ≤0.008 | 100 |
| S. pneumoniae serotype 3 (n = 27) | ||||
| Delafloxacin | 0.015 | 0.03 | 0.008–0.03 | 100 |
| Moxifloxacin | 0.25 | 0.25 | 0.12–0.25 | 100 |
| Azithromycin | 0.12 | 0.25 | 0.06–0.25 | 100 |
| Penicillina | ≤0.03 | ≤0.03 | ≤0.03–0.06 | 100 |
| Clindamycin | 0.06 | 0.06 | ≤0.015–0.12 | 100 |
| Ceftriaxone | 0.015 | 0.015 | ≤0.008–0.015 | 100 |
| S. pneumoniae serotype 19F (n = 14) | ||||
| Delafloxacin | 0.015 | 0.015 | 0.004–0.03 | 100 |
| Moxifloxacin | 0.12 | 0.25 | 0.12–0.25 | 100 |
| Azithromycin | 0.25 | >32 | 0.12–>32 | 85.7 |
| Penicillina | 0.25 | 2 | ≤0.03–2 | 14.3 |
| Clindamycin | 0.06 | 0.5 | 0.06–>32 | 85.7 |
| Ceftriaxone | 0.06 | 0.5 | 0.015–1 | 100 |
| S. pneumoniae serotype 23F (n = 10) | ||||
| Delafloxacin | 0.015 | 0.015 | 0.004–0.015 | 100 |
| Moxifloxacin | 0.12 | 0.25 | 0.06–0.25 | 100 |
| Azithromycin | 2 | >32 | 0.25–>32 | 40 |
| Penicillina | ≤0.03 | 2 | ≤0.03–2 | 50 |
| Clindamycin | 0.06 | >32 | 0.06–>32 | 80 |
| Ceftriaxone | 0.12 | 1 | 0.015–1 | 100 |
CLSI oral penicillin breakpoints.20
Discussion
In this Phase 3 clinical trial, S. pneumoniae strains were identified as the aetiology of CABP in 43.5% of adults in the microbiological ITT population.22 Notably, in the ITT population only 1.2% (10/859) of subjects were vaccinated with a pneumococcal vaccine within 5 years of enrolment, although PCV13 versus PCV23 vaccination data were not collected. Consistent with this low vaccination rate, most of the recovered pneumococcal strains (84.5%) belonged to vaccine serotypes. These findings reflect variation in pneumococcal vaccine policies and availability across countries as well as where clinical trial sites were located. Adults carrying vaccine types may represent a source for the transmission of S. pneumoniae to children and/or to other susceptible adults. Certainly, vaccination with pneumococcal vaccines may help reduce the burden of pneumococcal CABP by vaccine-targeted serotypes in such countries.
It is notable that 100% of the S. pneumoniae isolates were susceptible to both delafloxacin and moxifloxacin and no fluoroquinolone-resistant isolates were recovered. In a recent surveillance study of CABP pathogens, >98% of S. pneumoniae isolates from Eastern and Western Europe, Asia and Latin America were susceptible to levofloxacin.24 In contrast to the situation with fluoroquinolones, reduced susceptibility to macrolides and penicillin were observed. β-Lactam and macrolide antibiotics are frequently utilized to treat pneumococcal disease in the USA and Europe.25,26 In our study, resistance to these first line antibiotics was particularly evident for serotypes 19F and 23F, with a proportion of these serotypes being classified as MDR.20 These two serotypes have previously been reported to be MDR from surveillance studies conducted in Canada,27 China28 and Qatar.29 Most macrolide resistance in S. pneumoniae is mediated by the efflux/ribosomal protection gene cassette, mef(E)/mel or the target-modifying RNA methylase gene, erm(B).30,31 The mef(E)/mel machinery confers resistance to 14- and 15-membered macrolides (M-phenotype); while erm(B) confers resistance to macrolides, lincosamides, and streptogramin B (MLSB phenotype).32,33 These genes are often carried on transposons and thus, increasing resistance to macrolides in S. pneumoniae can be expected over time.
In conclusion, S. pneumoniae vaccine-targeted serotypes were the main cause of CABP in this Phase 3 CABP study. Fluoroquinolones including delafloxacin remain a good treatment option for CABP in adults caused by S. pneumoniae. However, one limitation of this study was the limited geographic distribution of S. pneumoniae isolates recovered from the clinical trial.
Acknowledgements
We acknowledge the laboratorians of Covance Central Laboratories and Renzo Valeriani, Dr Fuminori Sakai, and Dr LaMonta Beard from Emory University for their roles in generating the data in this study.
Contributor Information
S P McCurdy, Melinta Therapeutics, Morristown, NJ, USA.
A J Sheets, Melinta Therapeutics, Morristown, NJ, USA.
S K Cammarata, Melinta Therapeutics, Morristown, NJ, USA.
J E Vidal, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Funding
This work was supported by Melinta Therapeutics.
Transparency declarations
S.P.M. is an employee of Melinta Therapeutics. A.J.S. and S.K.C. were employees of Melinta Therapeutics at the time this study was performed and completed. J.E.V. was an employee of Emory University, Atlanta, GA at the time this study was performed and completed.
Author contributions
Conception and design: S.P.M. and S.K.C.; acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data: S.P.M., A.J.S., S.K.C., and J.E.V.; drafting the work and revising it critically for important intellectual content and giving final approval of the version to be published: S.P.M., A.J.S., S.K.C. and J.E.V.
References
- 1. Brown JD, Harnett J, Chambers R. et al. The relative burden of community-acquired pneumonia hospitalizations in older adults: a retrospective observational study in the United States. BMC Geriatr 2018; 18: 92. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. US CDC. Pneumococcal disease. https://www.cdc.gov/pneumococcal/index.html.
- 3. Torres A, Cillóniz C, Blasi F. et al. Burden of pneumococcal community-acquired pneumonia in adults across Europe: A literature review. Respir Med 2018; 137: 6–13. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Prevnar 13 FDA Approval History. https://www.drugs.com/history/prevnar-13.html.
- 5. Merck Vaccines. Indication for PNEUMOVAX 23. https://www.merckvaccines.com/pneumovax23/.
- 6. Leventer-Roberts M, Feldman BS, Brufman I. et al. Effectiveness of 23-valent pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine against invasive disease and hospital-treated pneumonia among people aged ≥65 years: a retrospective case-control study. Clin Infect Dis 2015; 60: 1472–80. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Matanock A, Lee G, Gierke R. et al. Use of 13-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine and 23-valent pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine among adults aged ≥65 years: updated recommendations of the advisory committee on immunization practices [published correction appears in MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2020; 68: 1195]. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2019; 68: 1069–75. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Pfaller MA, Mendes RE, Duncan LR. et al. In vitro activities of ceftaroline and comparators against Streptococcus pneumoniae Isolates from U.S. Hospitals: Results from Seven Years of the AWARE Surveillance Program (2010 to 2016). Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2018; 62: e01555–17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Kim SH, Chung DR, Song JH. et al. Changes in serotype distribution and antimicrobial resistance of Streptococcus pneumoniae isolates from adult patients in Asia: Emergence of drug-resistant non-vaccine serotypes. Vaccine 2020; 38: 6065–73. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. McCurdy S, Lawrence L, Quintas M. et al. In vitro activity of delafloxacin and microbiological response against fluoroquinolone-susceptible and non-susceptible staphylococcus aureus isolates from two phase 3 studies of acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2017; 61: e00772–17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Lodise T, Corey R, Hooper D. et al. Safety of delafloxacin: focus on adverse events of special interest. Open Forum Infect Dis 2018; 5: ofy220. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Delafloxacin USPI. https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/label/2019/208610s007,208611s006lbl.pdf.
- 13. McCurdy S, Keedy K, Lawrence L. et al. Efficacy of delafloxacin versus moxifloxacin against bacterial respiratory pathogens in adults with community-acquired bacterial pneumonia (CABP): microbiology results from the delafloxacin phase 3 CABP trial. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2020; 64: e01949–19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. McCurdy S, Nenninger A, Sheets A. et al. Efficacy of delafloxacin versus moxifloxacin against atypical bacterial respiratory pathogens in adults with community-acquired bacterial pneumonia (CABP): Data from the Delafloxacin Phase 3 CABP Trial. Int J Infect Dis 2020; 97: 374–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Rello J, Lisboa T, Lujan M. et al. Severity of pneumococcal pneumonia associated with genomic bacterial load. Chest 2009; 136: 832–40. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Sakai F, Sonaty G, Watson D. et al. Development and characterization of a synthetic DNA, NUversa, to be used as a standard in quantitative polymerase chain reactions for molecular pneumococcal serotyping. FEMS Microbiol Lett 2017; 364: fnx173. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. CLSI. Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing—Ninth Edition: M07. 2012.
- 18. US FDA. Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing Interpretive Criteria. https://www.fda.gov/drugs/development-resources/fda-recognized-antimicrobial-susceptibility-test-interpretive-criteria.
- 19. CLSI. Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing—Twenty Eighth Edition: M100. 2018.
- 20. Magiorakos AP, Srinivasan A, Carey RB. et al. Multidrug-resistant, extensively drug-resistant- and pandrug-resistant bacteria: an international expert proposal for interim standard definitions for acquired resistance. Clin Microbiol Infect 2012; 18: 268–81. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Carvalho MDG, Tondella ML, McCaustland K. et al. Evaluation and improvement of real-time PCR assays targeting lytA, ply, and psaA genes for detection of pneumococcal DNA. J Clin Microbiol 2007; 45: 2460–6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Horcajada JP, Salata RA, Álvarez-Sala R. et al. ; DEFINE-CABP Study Group. A phase 3 study to compare delafloxacin with moxifloxacin for the treatment of adults with community-acquired bacterial pneumonia (DEFINE-CABP). Open Forum Infect Dis 2019; 7: ofz514. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Bart SM, Farley JJ, Bala S. et al. Geographic shifts in antibacterial drug clinical trial enrollment: implications for generalizability. Clin Infect Dis 2020; 12: ciaa246. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Sader HS, Mendes RE, Le J. et al. Antimicrobial Susceptibility of Streptococcus pneumoniae from North America, Europe, Latin America, and the Asia-Pacific Region: Results From 20 Years of the SENTRY Antimicrobial Surveillance Program (1997-2016). Open Forum Infect Dis 2019; 6 Suppl 1: S14–23. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Metlay JP, Waterer GW, Long AC. et al. Diagnosis and treatment of adults with community-acquired pneumonia. An official clinical practice guideline of the American Thoracic Society and Infectious Diseases Society of America. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2019; 200: e45–67. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Lim WS, Baudouin SV, George RC. et al. BTS guidelines for the management of community acquired pneumonia in adults: update 2009. Thorax 2009; 64 Suppl 3: iii1–55. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Golden AR, Rosenthal M, Fultz B. et al. Characterization of MDR and XDR Streptococcus pneumoniae in Canada, 2007-13. J Antimicrob Chemother 2015; 70: 2199–202. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Zhao C, Li Z, Zhang F. et al. Serotype distribution and antibiotic resistance of Streptococcus pneumoniae isolates from 17 Chinese cities from 2011 to 2016. BMC Infect Dis 2017; 17: 804. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Elshafie S, Taj-Aldeen SJ.. Emerging resistant serotypes of invasive Streptococcus pneumoniae. Infect Drug Resist 2016; 9: 153–60. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30. Cochetti I, Tili E, Vecchi M. et al. New Tn916-related elements causing erm(B)-mediated erythromycin resistance in tetracycline-susceptible pneumococci. J Antimicrob Chemother 2007; 60: 127–31. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31. Chancey ST, Agrawal S, Schroeder MR. et al. Composite mobile genetic elements disseminating macrolide resistance in Streptococcus pneumoniae. Front Microbiol 2015; 6: 26. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32. Syrogiannopoulos GA, Grivea IN, Ednie LM. et al. Antimicrobial susceptibility and macrolide resistance inducibility of Streptococcus pneumoniae carrying erm(A), erm(B), or mef(A). Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2003; 47: 2699–702. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33. Gay K, Stephens DS.. Structure and dissemination of a chromosomal insertion element encoding macrolide efflux in Streptococcus pneumoniae. J Infect Dis 2001; 184: 56–65. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

