Abstract
The use of bast fiber film can improve rice seedling quality, and nano-silicon fertilizer can increase rice yields. This study aimed to compare the effects of using bast fiber film, nano-silicon fertilizer, and both treatments on rice yield and lodging resistance. A 2-year field experiment was conducted in 2017 and 2018, in Liaoning, China. The experiment comprised a control (no-bast fiber film, no nano-silicon fertilizer; CK), and three treatments: seedlings cultivated with bast film (FM), single nano-silicon fertilization (SF), and bast fiber film seedlings + nano-silicon fertilization (FM + SF). The japonica rice (Oryza sativa L.) cultivar Liaojing 371 was used. Compared with the plants in CK, those in the FM treatment showed greater average root diameter, root volume and root dry weight. The SF treatment increased the single stem flexural strength, increased the contents of silicon, lignin, and cellulose in the rice plant stalk, and reduced the lodging index, thereby increasing lodging resistance. The SF treatment resulted in increased leaf chlorophyll content at late growth stage and a higher net photosynthetic rate, which increased plant dry matter accumulation. In the FM + SF treatment, plant growth was enhanced during the whole growth period, which resulted in an increased number of effective panicles and an increased grain yield. The results show that the combination of FM and SF synergistically improves rice lodging resistance and grain yield. This low-cost, high-efficiency system is of great significance for improving the stability and lodging resistance of rice plants, thereby increasing yields.
Subject terms: Physiology, Plant sciences
Introduction
Bast fiber film is an eco-friendly and biodegradable seedling raising cloth that is made from bast fibers and small amounts of eco-friendly biodegradable pulp1,2. Bast fiber film has been widely used in agriculture in China since 2015 because it is inexpensive, improves seedling quality and uniformity, reduces seedling losses from seedling plates, and ensures better mechanical transplanting3. Compared with ordinary plastic film, bast fiber film provides a more constant temperature environment for rice seedlings4,5. It is also breathable and hygroscopic. Mulching with bast fiber film on the seedling tray increases the oxygen supply to the soil so that oxygen consumed by soil microbial activity is readily compensated6. Using bast fiber film to raise rice seedlings can promote root growth and enhance seedling vitality, and the stronger root systems improve seedling quality. After transplantation into the field, the rice seedlings cultivated with bast fiber film rapidly accumulate photosynthetic pigments and produce tillers early, which increases the number of effective panicles7,8. In addition, the bast fiber film is degraded into organic matter, which has a soil-fertilizing effect and thus further stimulates the growth and development of transplanted rice9. There is a close and direct relationship between the rice root system and the photosynthetic characteristics of aboveground leaves10. In rice plants, rapid pigment accumulation and root growth and development facilitate photosynthesis. This leads to the accumulation of photosynthates in the aboveground parts of rice plants at an early stage of growth, so that more resources are available for grain filling.
As a typical silicon-accumulating crop, rice plants contain large amounts of silicon. The total silicon content in rice plants is greater than the sum of the contents of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium10. Generally, the SiO2 content in stems and leaves reaches 10%–20% on a dry weight basis, so rice is a representative siliceous plants11. Silicon plays an important role in rice growth, and large amounts of this mineral are required to maintain normal growth and development12. The application of silicon fertilizer can increase chlorophyll content and delay leaf senescence in the late growth stage of rice, thus increasing photosynthesis in the functional leaves13. This increases the ability of rice plants to assimilate photosynthetic products during the vegetative growth stage, which improves grain filling and grain quality, and increases resistance and yield14–16. Silicon fertilizers can also increase the cellulose content in rice plants during the whole growth period, which in turn hardens the stems and enhances resistance to the lodging and certain diseases. Nano-silica is a novel type of nano-scaled silicon fertilizer made from particles of sparingly soluble materials by nanotechnology methods17. Small particle-sized nano-fertilizers are more likely to pass through biological barriers, such as plant cell walls, to fully exert their effects18. To date, few studies have evaluated the effects of nano-silicon fertilizers on rice plants.
Previous studies on the use of bast fiber film to raise rice seedlings have reported its beneficial effects on the growth and development of rice at the seedling stage and after transplantation5. However, it also results in increased plant height, which increases the risk of lodging19. At present, little is known about the effect of bast fiber film on rice plants at the later stages of growth and development. The middle to late stages of grain filling are crucially important for rice yield, and the photosynthetic characteristics in the critical growth period of rice and lodging at later stages determine the magnitude of yield20–23. Nano-silicon fertilizers can delay senescence and enhance the resistance of rice plants24. Therefore, we speculated that the combination of the blast fiber film and nano-silicon fertilizer might synergistically affect both rice lodging resistance and yield. If so, then this would be a low-cost, simple, and effective way to improve rice production.
Materials and methods
Plant materials and experimental design
A field experiment was conducted in 2017 and 2018 at the Rice Research Institute in Liaoning Province, Shenyang, Liaoning, China (N 41° 38′ 31.87″, E 123° 18′ 10.45″). This area is in the North Temperate Zone and has a semi-humid continental climate, with an average annual temperature of 8 °C, an average annual precipitation of 660 mm, and an average annual frost-free period of 170 days. The basic physical and chemical properties of the paddy soil (0–20 cm) were as follows: pH 6.87; organic matter content, 25.13 g/kg−1; total nitrogen content, 1.34 g/kg−1; available nitrogen content, 85.68 mg/kg−1; available phosphorus content, 12.74 mg/kg−1; available potassium content, 90.99 mg/kg−1; and available silicon content, 176.64 mg/kg−1.
The conventional japonica rice variety Liaojing 371(medium yield, low to medium lodging level) was used. The bast fiber film used in this study was developed by the Institute of Bast Fiber Crops, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, and the fertilizer was ‘Silicon Boyuan’ micro-nano-silicon fertilizer. The experiment comprised a control (CK; no bast fiber film, no nano-silicon fertilizer) and three treatments: seedlings raised with bast fiber film (FM), a single nano-Silicon fertilization treatment (SF) and bast fiber film + nano-silicon fertilization (FM + SF). Seeds were sown uniformly with an automatic rice planter at 100 g per tray (60 cm × 30 cm) in soil. Ten seedling trays were established for each treatment. The trays were randomly placed in a greenhouse and managed in the same way as in a conventional dry nursery. Seven days before transplanting, an aqueous solution of micro-nano-silicon fertilizer (concentration, 20% w/v; volume, 100 mL per tray) was evenly applied to seedlings in the SF and FM + SF treatments. The seedlings were transplanted at the 3.5-leaf age at a row spacing of 30 cm × 16.7 cm. The planting area of each plot was 100 m2. Each treatment had three replicates and the experiment had a randomized block design. Seeds were sown on April 25th, seedlings were transplanted on May 25th, and the mature plants were harvested on October 1st.
Measurement of root agronomic traits and plant biomass
Samples were taken from the tray one day before transplanting. Ten representative rice seedlings in each plot were sampled to measure root length and root volume using a root scanner and supporting analytical software (WinRHIZO Pro 2016; Regent Instruments Inc., Quebec City, Canada). At maturity, The dry weight of aboveground parts was determined and five representative plants were selected for analysis(The average number of tillers of ten consecutive rice plants is used as a representative standard). The plants were divided into four parts: ear, stem, leaf, and sheath. The parts were dried separately in an oven at 105 °C for 10 min, and then at 80 °C to constant weight.
Measurement of SPAD value and photosynthetic characteristics
The upper third of the rice flag leaves was used to measure the SPAD value and photosynthetic characteristics on the 15th day after full heading. The SPAD value and photosynthetic characteristics were measured with a SPAD-502 chlorophyll meter (Minolta, Radiometric Instruments Div., Osaka, Japan) and an LI-6400 portable photosynthesis system (LI-COR, Inc., Lincoln, NE, USA), respectively. The photosynthetic characteristics were net photosynthetic rate (A), stomatal conductance (Gs), intercellular carbon dioxide concentration (Ci), and transpiration rate (E). These measurements were conducted between 9 and 11 am on a sunny day.
Measurement of lodging resistance-related traits
On the tenth days before maturity, rice plants from five hills per plot were selected, five representative tillers with consistent growth were chosen using the secondary sampling method, and the average value was determined. The plant height, center of gravity height, basal internode (including leaf sheath) length, stem diameter, and dry matter weight were recorded. The internode breaking resistance was measured with a stem strength tester (Model: YYD-1,Zhejiang Top Instruments, Zhejiang, China)25. The stems were collected from mature plants. The silicon concentration in the plant stem was determined by the colorimetric molybdenum blue method26, and cellulose and lignin contents were determined using Van Soest’s washed fiber analysis method27.
Measurement of yield and its components
At harvest, the rice yield was measured for an area of 10 m2 per treatment. After drying and threshing, the rice grains were weighed to calculate grain yield. The number of effective panicles in 20 consecutively growing rice plants in each treatment was counted. Use the average number of tillers as the standard for selecting rice to determine the yield components. The number of grains per panicle, seed setting rate, 1000-grain weight and the grain yield were recorded.
Data analysis
Data were processed and analyzed using GraphPad Prism 8 and SPSS 18 statistical software. Significant differences among treatments were detected using two-way ANOVA.
My experimental research and field studies on Oryza sativa L (either cultivated or wild), including the collection of plant material, comply with relevant institutional, national, and international guidelines and legislation.
Results
Effects of bast fiber film and nano-silicon fertilizer treatments on rice yield
Both the FM and SF treatments had significant positive effects on the number of panicles (Table 1). The number of panicles in 2017 and 2018 was increased by 11.4%–4.5%, respectively, in the FM + SF treatment compared with CK. As shown in Fig. 1, the maximum temperature from July to August in 2018 was higher than that in previous years, which affected the overall rice yield and yield structure.The high temperature during the flowering period in 2018 resulted in a general decrease in grain yield, accompanied by lower panicle number, seed setting rate, and 1000-grain weight, compared with their respective values in 2017. The seed setting rate was significantly among treatments in 2018, and was higher in the FM and FM + SF treatments than in CK. The 1000-grain weight of rice significantly higher (by about 3%) in the SF and FM + SF treatments than in CK. The yield was about 8% higher in the FM + SF treatment than in CK; this difference was statistically significant.
Table 1.
Year | Treatment | Yield (t/hm2) | Panicle number (10,000 /hm2) | Grain number per panicle | Seed setting rate (%) | 1000-grain weight (g) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2017 | CK | 9.80 ± 0.44b | 377.2 ± 9.9b | 105 ± 5a | 91.18 ± 0.55a | 27.20 ± 0.10b |
FM | 10.25 ± 0.23ab | 403.9 ± 16.2ab | 103 ± 5a | 91.89 ± 0.66a | 26.83 ± 0.15c | |
SF | 10.15 ± 0.49ab | 393.7 ± 16.5ab | 102 ± 5a | 91.17 ± 0.25a | 27.83 ± 0.06a | |
FM + SF | 10.62 ± 0.33a | 420.2 ± 9.8a | 100 ± 6a | 92.68 ± 1.31a | 27.70 ± 0.10a | |
2018 | CK | 8.68 ± 0.10b | 331.9 ± 14.2a | 101 ± 7a | 84.27 ± 0.41c | 25.23 ± 0.06b |
FM | 9.05 ± 0.13ab | 339.9 ± 19.2a | 113 ± 6a | 90.93 ± 0.78a | 26.37 ± 0.06a | |
SF | 9.22 ± 0.39ab | 334.8 ± 14.4a | 112 ± 5a | 87.58 ± 1.21b | 26.47 ± 0.06a | |
FM + SF | 9.38 ± 0.42a | 379.9 ± 39.3a | 107 ± 6a | 89.37 ± 1.19ab | 26.23 ± 0.23a | |
Y | 278.67** | 87.26** | 3.28 ns | 9.10 ns | 17.78* | |
T | 21.46* | 12.31* | 0.53 ns | 1.90 ns | 1.75 ns | |
Y*T | 0.23 ns | 0.48 ns | 2.09 ns | 11.64** | 42.55** |
Different letters indicate significant difference at 5% level. Summary of ANOVA results: not significant (ns), significant at p < 0.05 (*), very significant at p < 0.01 (**).
Y Year, T Treatment.
Effects of bast fiber film and silicon fertilizer on rice seedling quality
The root projected area, root surface area, and root volume differed significantly among treatments (Table 2). The 2-year average root length was significantly increased by 11.1% in the FM treatment and by 27.6% in the FM + SF treatment compared with that in CK. The 2-year average values of root projected area, surface area, and root volume were 38.9%, 42.6%, and 54.8% higher, respectively, in the FM + SF treatment than in CK. The average diameter of seedling roots was higher in the FM and SF treatments than in CK in 2018, but not significantly different among the treatments in 2017.
Table 2.
Year | Treatment | Root length(cm) | Projected area (cm2) | Surface area (cm2) | Mean diameter (mm) | Root volume (cm3) | Root tip number |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2017 | CK | 94.11 ± 1.94b | 2.86 ± 0.33b | 8.97 ± 1.04b | 0.30 ± 0.03a | 0.07 ± 0.01a | 693.67 ± 142.94a |
FM | 105.34 ± 3.22a | 3.68 ± 0.57a | 11.57 ± 1.78ab | 0.36 ± 0.03a | 0.11 ± 0.03a | 653.50 ± 140.50a | |
SF | 96.77 ± 6.20b | 3.00 ± 0.31b | 10.34 ± 2.08ab | 0.34 ± 0.05a | 0.09 ± 0.03a | 467.75 ± 21.26b | |
FM + SF | 110.95 ± 2.20a | 3.71 ± 0.13a | 12.08 ± 0.19a | 0.34 ± 0.01a | 0.10 ± 0.01a | 576.06 ± 150.68ab | |
2018 | CK | 95.46 ± 0.91c | 2.71 ± 0.26c | 8.48 ± 0.82b | 0.28 ± 0.03b | 0.06 ± 0.01b | 628.92 ± 85.67c |
FM | 105.34 ± 3.23b | 3.68 ± 0.57ab | 11.57 ± 1.78a | 0.36 ± 0.03a | 0.11 ± 0.03a | 653.50 ± 140.50b | |
SF | 99.45 ± 3.05c | 3.07 ± 0.21bc | 11.28 ± 1.30a | 0.35 ± 0.03a | 0.10 ± 0.02a | 565.75 ± 24.13b | |
FM + SF | 131.19 ± 3.89a | 4.00 ± 0.32a | 12.56 ± 1.00a | 0.31 ± 0.02ab | 0.10 ± 0.01a | 871.33 ± 105.46a | |
Y | 1.63 ns | 0.34 ns | 0.57 ns | 1.04 ns | 0.12 ns | 1.09 ns | |
T | 6.05 ns | 31.58** | 25.17* | 7.29 ns | 27.64* | 1.23 ns | |
Y*T | 11.65** | 0.37 ns | 0.30 ns | 0.73 ns | 0.19 ns | 2.90 ns |
Different letters indicate significant difference at 5% level. Summary of ANOVA results: not significant (ns), significant at p < 0.05 (*), very significant at p < 0.01 (**).
Y Year, T Treatment.
Effects of bast fiber film and silicon fertilizer treatments on SPAD value, photosynthetic characteristics, and dry matter allocation
The A and Gs values were 19.1% and 16.9% higher, respectively, in the FM + SF treatment than in CK. There were no significant differences in Ci and E among treatments. The SPAD values were significantly higher in FM + SF and SF treatments than in CK. The A, Gs, E, and SPAD values of plants in the various treatments are shown in Table 3.
Table 3.
Year | Treatment | Pn (μmol CO2 m−2 s−1) | Cond (μmol H2O m−2 s−1) | Ci (μmol CO2 mol−1) | Trmmol (mmol m−2 s−1) | SPAD |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2017 | CK | 14.28 ± 0.15c | 0.59 ± 0.05b | 302.20 ± 4.21a | 7.03 ± 0.17a | 34.9 ± 0.15c |
FM | 15.84 ± 0.58ab | 0.65 ± 0.03ab | 303.60 ± 2.70a | 6.97 ± 0.14a | 35.1 ± 0.26c | |
SF | 15.06 ± 0.68bc | 0.61 ± 0.04ab | 303.60 ± 1.82a | 7.19 ± 0.21a | 35.8 ± 0.40b | |
FM + SF | 16.54 ± 1.14a | 0.69 ± 0.11a | 303.80 ± 6.06a | 7.06 ± 0.31a | 36.6 ± 0.12a | |
2018 | CK | 14.10 ± 0.20c | 0.60 ± 0.06a | 302.40 ± 3.29a | 7.09 ± 0.28a | 35.5 ± 0.35c |
FM | 15.86 ± 0.57b | 0.61 ± 0.08a | 302.40 ± 4.16a | 7.00 ± 0.16a | 36.4 ± 0.20b | |
SF | 15.30 ± 0.48b | 0.62 ± 0.02a | 303.60 ± 1.82a | 7.22 ± 0.16a | 36.7 ± 0.15b | |
FM + SF | 17.30 ± 0.83a | 0.68 ± 0.03a | 305.80 ± 7.53a | 7.12 ± 0.10a | 37.2 ± 0.25a | |
Y | 1.07 ns | 0.82 ns | 0.14 ns | 36.95* | 27.22* | |
T | 32.16 ** | 10.88 * | 2.58 ns | 159.06* | 32.89* | |
Y*T | 0.96 ns | 0.37 ns | 0.23 ns | 0.01 ns | 1.88 ns |
Different letters indicate significant difference at 5% level. Summary of ANOVA results: not significant (ns), significant at p < 0.05 (*), very significant at p < 0.01 (**).
Y Year, T Treatment, Pn Net photosynthetic rate, Cond Stomatal conductance, Ci Intercellular carbon dioxide concentration. Trmmol Transpiration rate.
As shown in Table 4, the biological yield and the sheath dry weight of rice were significantly higher in the FM treatment than in CK in both 2017 and 2018. The harvest index was 6.5% and 4.2% higher in the FM + SF treatment than in CK in 2017 and 2018, respectively. Because of the influence of temperature during the flowering period in 2017 and 2018, the effects of FM and SF on yield were slightly different between the 2 years, but the trend was the same.
Table 4.
Year | Treatment | Biological yield (t ha−1) | Sheath dry weight (t ha−1) | Stem dry weight (t ha−1) | Leaf dry weight (t ha−1) | Harvest index |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2017 | CK | 21.17 ± 0.31b | 4.44 ± 0.38ab | 2.78 ± 0.27ab | 4.16 ± 0.24a | 0.46 ± 0.01bc |
FM | 22.70 ± 0.82a | 4.88 ± 0.22a | 3.22 ± 0.43a | 4.34 ± 0.14a | 0.45 ± 0.01c | |
SF | 20.59 ± 0.51b | 4.23 ± 0.31b | 2.47 ± 0.39b | 3.74 ± 0.56a | 0.49 ± 0.02a | |
FM + SF | 21.71 ± 0.52ab | 4.23 ± 0.29b | 2.65 ± 0.32ab | 4.2 ± 0.24a | 0.49 ± 0.02ab | |
2018 | CK | 18.03 ± 1.34a | 3.72 ± 0.16b | 2.39 ± 0.33a | 3.24 ± 0.43a | 0.48 ± 0.03ab |
FM | 19.65 ± 0.47a | 4.22 ± 0.12a | 2.61 ± 0.2a | 3.77 ± 0.19a | 0.46 ± 0.00b | |
SF | 19.33 ± 0.43a | 4.1 ± 0.09a | 2.48 ± 0.09a | 3.54 ± 0.46a | 0.48 ± 0.01ab | |
FM + SF | 18.67 ± 1.29a | 3.68 ± 0.23b | 2.24 ± 0.25a | 3.36 ± 0.46a | 0.5 ± 0.02a | |
Y | 254.28* | 15.16 ns | 7.19 ns | 14.37 ns | 6.23 ns | |
T | 1.70 ns | 4.22* | 2.75 ns | 1.12* | 2.98 ns | |
Y*T | 1.60 ns | 0.41 ns | 1.12 ns | 0.90 ns | 1.24 ns |
Different letters indicate significant difference at 5% level. Summary of ANOVA results: not significant (ns), significant at p < 0.05 (*), very significant at p < 0.01 (**).
Y Year, T Treatment.
Effects of bast fiber film and silicon fertilizer on lodging resistance of rice at late filling stage
As shown in Table 5, the 2-year average values of plant height and center of gravity were significantly higher in the FM treatment than in CK. The length of the first, second and third sections in the SF treatment were shorter than their corresponding counterparts in CK, while the stem diameter was slightly greater than that of CK. The dry weight per unit length of the first and the second nodes was significantly higher in the FM + SF treatment than in CK.
Table 5.
Year | Treatment | Plant height (cm) | Center of gravity height (cm) | First node | Second node | Third node | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Internode length (cm) | Stem diameter (mm) | Unit length dry weight (g/cm) | Internode length (cm) | Stem diameter (mm) | Unit length dry weight (g cm−1) | Internode length (cm) | Stem diameter (mm) | Unit length dry weight (g/cm) | ||||
2017 | CK | 118.00b | 34.70b | 6.36a | 5.37b | 0.07b | 11.71ab | 5.03a | 0.04b | 15.48ab | 4.23a | 0.04a |
FM | 123.60a | 35.60a | 5.69a | 5.61ab | 0.06b | 12.51a | 5.02a | 0.03b | 17.20a | 4.06a | 0.02a | |
SF | 115.70b | 33.70b | 2.64b | 6.06a | 0.13a | 10.14bc | 5.05a | 0.04b | 14.71b | 4.18a | 0.03a | |
FM + SF | 116.70b | 34.00b | 3.39b | 6.06a | 0.13a | 9.74c | 5.10a | 0.05a | 14.12b | 4.40a | 0.03a | |
2018 | CK | 116.70a | 32.90a | 5.72a | 5.41c | 0.07b | 11.39a | 4.92a | 0.04b | 15.6ab | 4.21a | 0.03a |
FM | 119.70a | 33.30a | 5.18b | 5.68bc | 0.07b | 11.78a | 4.88a | 0.04b | 17.00a | 4.13a | 0.03a | |
SF | 111.30b | 31.50b | 2.8c | 6.23a | 0.11a | 10.07b | 5.07a | 0.05a | 14.47bc | 4.19a | 0.03a | |
FM + SF | 112.00b | 31.80b | 3.06c | 5.93ab | 0.11a | 9.65b | 5.05a | 0.05a | 13.02c | 4.19a | 0.03a | |
Y | 14.92* | 286.92** | 1.59 ns | 0.31 ns | 0.97 ns | 5.32 ns | 2.41 ns | 7.76 ns | 2.98 ns | 0.69 ns | 0.49 ns | |
T | 15.27* | 45.63** | 45.85** | 26.87* | 17.25* | 66.65** | 3.18 ns | 4.67 ns | 34.30** | 2.19 ns | 1.32 ns | |
Y*T | 2.15 ns | 0.39 ns | 1.59 ns | 0.94 ns | 1.15 ns | 0.80 ns | 0.25 ns | 2.77 ns | 0.68 ns | 1.17 ns | 1.44 ns |
Different letters indicate significant difference at 5% level. Summary of ANOVA results: not significant (ns), significant at p < 0.05 (*), very significant at p < 0.01 (**).
Y Year, T Treatment.
As shown in Table 6, the bending moment and lodging index of all nodes were significantly higher in the FM treatment than in CK. The breaking resistance and bending moment of all nodes, except the second and third nodes in 2017, were significantly higher in the SF treatment than in CK, while the lodging index of the first node was lower in the SF treatment than in CK. The FM + SF treatment resulted in increased breaking resistance and decreased lodging index of the first node, relative to those in CK but did not affect any other node parameters.
Table 6.
Year | Treatment | First node | Second node | Third node | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Breaking resistance (N) | Bending moment (cm/g) | Lodging index | Breaking resistance (N) | Bending moment (cm/g) | Lodging index | Breaking resistance (N) | Bending moment (cm/g) | Lodging index | ||
2017 | CK | 39.05bc | 1596.47b | 41.70b | 24.38a | 1231.71b | 53.44b | 17.65a | 992.17a | 63.9ab |
FM | 33.44c | 1792.15a | 54.68a | 16.53b | 1403.96a | 86.23a | 13.61b | 996.09a | 74.51a | |
SF | 60.00a | 1627.69b | 27.78c | 26.25a | 1396.66a | 54.25b | 17.70a | 1053.38a | 60.13b | |
FM + SF | 44.83b | 1641.98b | 37.13b | 26.08a | 1385.82a | 52.03b | 17.63a | 1058.34a | 61.81ab | |
2018 | CK | 38.84b | 1520.74b | 39.28b | 21.61b | 1251.16b | 57.94b | 15.66b | 945.79c | 60.4b |
FM | 34.5b | 1649.51a | 47.95a | 19.11c | 1387.64a | 72.63a | 13.75c | 1050.44ab | 76.44a | |
SF | 50a | 1526.68b | 30.57c | 23.83a | 1380.91a | 58.02b | 17.63a | 1093.23a | 61.99b | |
FM + SF | 45.03a | 1418.2c | 31.6c | 23.21ab | 1267.62b | 54.62b | 15.91b | 1006.59bc | 63.35b | |
Y | 0.49 ns | 2.14 ns | 0.11 ns | 0.60 ns | 2.11 ns | 0.02 ns | 0.24 ns | 1.46 ns | 0.07 ns | |
T | 8.76 ns | 1745.43** | 27.27* | 6.36 ns | –** | 7.99 ns | 20.68* | –** | 29.44* | |
Y*T | 12.04** | 0.02 ns | 4.53* | 11.10** | –ns | 12.84** | 1.37 ns | –ns | 1.44 ns |
Different letters indicate significant difference at 5% level. Summary of ANOVA results: not significant (ns), significant at p < 0.05 (*), very significant at p < 0.01 (**).
Y Year, T Treatment.
The application of nano-silicon fertilizer significantly increased the silicon content in rice stems. The stem silicon content in the FM + SF and SF treatments was 6.94 mg.g−1 and 6.74 mg.g−1, respectively, 38% and 34% higher than that in CK (Fig. 2).
The cellulose and lignin contents in stems were also significantly higher in the SF and FM + SF treatments than in CK (Fig. 3). The cellulose content in the stems was 15.21% in the FM + SF treatment, 17% higher than that in CK. The lignin content in the stems was 15.30% in the FM + SF treatment, 44% higher than that in CK. The cellulose and lignin contents in stalks did not differ significantly between FM and CK.
Discussion
Because bast fiber film is a breathable mulch, oxygen consumed at the bottom of rice seedling discs is readily replaced, similar to the case in aerobic cultivation28. The use of bast fiber film benefits the root growth of rice seedlings. It can promote root primordia differentiation, which increases the numbers of adventitious roots and denser and better-quality root networks29. Mulching with bast fiber film can also increase rice seedling root vitality and the number of white roots, which contributes to whole plant growth. This leads to improved seedling quality and faster pigment accumulation after transplanting30. Higher dry matter accumulation in above-ground parts of seedlings can induce earlier tillering after transplanting, which resulted in an increased number of effective tillers and higher yields31–33. The results of this study show that the use of bast fiber film can promote the growth and development of rice seedling roots. In this study, seedlings cultivated with bast fiber film showed increased dry weight, mean diameter, volume, and surface area of roots, increased stem base diameter and aboveground growth, and improved plant quality. These attributes resulted in rapid greening after transplanting and better growth and development of photosynthetic organs. These effects resulted in rapid dry matter accumulation, which provided the basis for higher and more stable rice yields.
The SPAD value is an indirect index of leaf chlorophyll content34. In this study, the use of bast fiber film to cultivate seedlings and the application of nano-silicon fertilizer at the seedling stage increased the chlorophyll content of rice leaves and delayed senescence, thereby enhancing photosynthesis in functional leaves. This improved the capacity of rice plants to assimilate photosynthetic products during the growth stage. Our results also show that the use of bast fiber film to cultivate seedlings resulted in increased dry matter accumulation in leaves and stems, thereby increasing biological and grain yields. Using bast fiber film to cultivate seedlings or applying nano-silicon fertilizer at the seedling stage slightly increased yield compared with that of the control, but the combination of these two treatments increased the effective panicle number per unit area, which significantly increases the yield.
In the rice plants in the combined bast fiber film and nano-silicon fertilizer treatment, the flag leaf chlorophyll content at the late growth stage was 4.8% higher, the net photosynthetic rate was 10.9% higher, and the dry weight at the mature stage was 9.5% higher than their respective values in the control. Our results show that the use of bast fiber film can promote seedling regeneration after transplanting and that the application of silicon fertilizer can delay senescence, enhance the photosynthetic capacity, and increase dry matter accumulation, thereby boosting yields.
Liu et al.35 reported that a high lignin level in the cell wall improves lodging resistance, and suggested target genes for the genetic modification of lignin content to breed rice lines with high lodging resistance. Our results show that the application of nano-silicon fertilizer can significantly increase the contents of silicon, lignin, and cellulose in stalks, shorten internode length, and reduce plant height. All these changes increase lodging resistance. In addition, the application of nano-silicon fertilizer can significantly increase the dry weight per unit length, which lowers the lodging index and increases lodging resistance.
Conclusions
Using bast fiber film to cultivate rice seedlings can promote growth at the cost of increasing the risk of lodging. Applying nano-silicon fertilizer can delay senescence and improve the lodging resistance of rice plants. Our results show that the combination of bast fiber film to cultivate rice seedlings and nano-silicon fertilizer synergistically affects rice yield, lodging resistance, root characteristics, and leaf photosynthetic traits. Thus, this is a low-cost and simple method to improve rice yields effectively and efficiently.
Acknowledgements
This study was supported by the Earmarked Fund for the National Natural Science Foundation of China International (Regional) Cooperation and Exchange Project (31911530100), and the China Agriculture Research System (CARS-01-50).We thank Liwen Bianji, Edanz Editing China (www.liwenbianji.cn/ac), for editing a draft of this manuscript.
Author contributions
D.G. conducted all experiments and data processing and article writing; X.Z., J.Y., G.D., G.Y. conducted some experiments; W.Z., Q.Z., Q.G. conducted article modifications. W.Z., G.D. conducted financial support for experiments.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Footnotes
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
References
- 1.Aliakbar G, Togay O. A review of natural fiber composites: properties, modification and processing techniques, characterization, applications. J. Mater. Sci. 2020;55:829–892. doi: 10.1007/s10853-019-03990-y. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Farrer, J., & Watt, C. Flax: Sustainability Is the New Luxury. In: Handbook of Sustainable Luxury Textiles and Fashion. Environmental Footprints and Eco-design of Products and Processes. Gardetti, M., & Muthu, S. (eds), Springer, Singapore. 10.1007/978-981-287-633-1_2 (2015).
- 3.Yi YJ, Zhou WL, Li M, Wang HY. Preliminary study of raising rice seedling padded with bast fiber film for machine-transplanting. Plant Fiber Sci. China. 2013;1:19–21. [Google Scholar]
- 4.An HY, Liu W, Zhang JK, Sheng S, Xie J, Sun GQ, Wang RX, Miao QS. Effects of seedbed mulched non-textile on the temperature of seedbed and growth of seedlings. Vegetables. 2018;4:13–17. [Google Scholar]
- 5.Wortman SE, Kadoma I, Crandall MD. Assessing the potential for spunbond, nonwoven biodegradable fabric as mulches for tomato and bell pepper crops. Sci. Hortic. 2015;193:209–217. doi: 10.1016/j.scienta.2015.07.019. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Zhou WL, Niu YB, Wang CY, Yang YR, Tan ZJ, Yi YJ, Yu W, Wang HY. A biodegradable ramie fiber-based nonwoven film used for increasing oxygen supply to cultivated soil. Appl. Sci. 2018;8(10):1813–1823. doi: 10.3390/app8101813. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Xiong CC, Li JZ, Wang HW, Yu AA, Li X, Tang DL. Test and demonstration of degradable bast fiber mulching film breeding and machine transplanting technology of early rice seedling. Hubei Agric. Sci. 2013;52(13):2994–2996. doi: 10.14088/j.cnki.issn0439-8114.2013.13.054. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Zeng GA, Li YW, Xiao HY, Zhao JL, Tian Z. Technical demonstration summary of raising rice seedling padded with bast fiber film for machine-transplanting. Plant Fiber Sci. China. 2013;2:107–109. [Google Scholar]
- 9.Liu Q. Application and prospect of bast fiber film on raising rice seedlings for machine transplanting. Plant Fiber Sci. China. 2015;37(6):317–321. [Google Scholar]
- 10.Meena VD, Dotaniya ML, Coumar V, Rajendiran S, Kundu S, Rao AS. A case for silicon fertilization to improve crop yields in tropical soils. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. India Sect. B Biol. Sci. 2014;84(3):505–518. doi: 10.1007/s40011-013-0270-y. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Wang F, Peng SB. Yield potential and nitrogen use efficiency of China’s super rice. J. Integr. Agric. 2017;5:1000–1008. doi: 10.1016/S2095-3119(16)61561-7. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Yu GX, Gong DK, Dai GJ. Research progress on silicon fertilizer increasing rice yield, improving quality and increasing resistance. China Rice. 2019;1:21–25. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-8082.2019.01.005. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Pati S, Pal B, Badole S. Effect of silicon fertilization on growth, yield, and nutrient uptake of rice. Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal. 2016;47(3):284–290. doi: 10.1080/00103624.2015.1122797. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Liu HF, Song AL, Fan FL, Li ZJ, Liang YC. Effects of different silicon fertilizers on rice stem characteristics under high nitrogen supply levels. J. Plant Nutr. Fertil. 2018;3:758–768. doi: 10.11674/zwyf.17485. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Ren H, Fu LD, Wang Y, Lu XH, Du M. Effects of different silicon fertilizer application patterns on rice yield and quality. J. Northeast Agric. Sci. 2019;44(4):13–18. doi: 10.16423/j.cnki.1003-8701.2019.04.004. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Wu JF, Xie F, Fu TX, Pan XH, Shi QH. Effect of application of nitrogen combined with silicon on grain yield of double cropping rice and silicon absorption. J. Jiangxi Agric. Univ. 2017;39(5):843–850. doi: 10.13836/j.jjau.2017109. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Sun DQ, Lu XH, Hu YL, Li WM, Duan YJ, Pang ZC, Hu HG. Research progress of silica nanoparticle effects on the growth and development of plants. Chin. J. Trop. Crops. 2019;40(11):2300–2311. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2561.2019.11.028. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Nair R. Nanoparticulate material delivery to plants. Plant Sci. 2010;179(3):154–163. doi: 10.1016/j.plantsci.2010.04.012. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Zhang WJ, Wu LM, Wu XR, Ding YF, Li GH, Li JY, Weng F, Liu ZH, Tang S, Ding CQ, Wang SH. Lodging resistance of japonica rice (Oryza Sativa L): morphological and anatomical traits due to top-dressing nitrogen application rates. Rice. 2016;9(1):31. doi: 10.1186/s12284-016-0103-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Dong MH, Chen PF, Xie YL, Qiao ZY, Yang JC. Variations in carbohydrate and protein accumulation among spikelets at different positions within a panicle during rice grain filling. Rice Sci. 2012;19(3):223–232. doi: 10.1016/s1672-6308(12)60044-4. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Lang YZ, Yang XD, Wang M, Zhu QS. Effects of lodging at different filling stages on rice yield and grain quality. Rice Sci. 2012;19(4):315–319. doi: 10.1016/s1672-6308(12)60056-0. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Okamura M, Arai-Sanoh Y, Yoshida H, Mukouyama T, Kondo M. Characterization of high-yielding rice cultivars with different grain-filling properties to clarify limiting factors for improving grain yield. Field Crops Res. 2018;219:139–147. doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2018.01.035. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Wei HH, Meng TY, Li XY, Dai QG, Yin XY. Sink-source relationship during rice grain filling is associated with grain nitrogen concentration. Field Crops Res. 2018;215:23–38. doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2017.09.029. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Zhang J, Zou WH, Li Y, Feng YQ, Zhang H, Wu ZL, Tu YY, Wang YT, Cai XW, Peng LC. Silica distinctively affects cell wall features and lignocellulosic saccharification with large enhancement on biomass production in rice. Plant Sci. 2015;239:84–91. doi: 10.1016/j.plantsci.2015.07.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Li FC, Xie GS, Huang JF. OsCESA9 conserved-site mutation leads to largely enhanced plant lodging resistance and biomass enzymatic saccharification by reducing cellulose DP and crystallinity in rice. Plant Biotechnol. 2017;15:1093–1104. doi: 10.1111/pbi.12700. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Hua HX, Yu HG, Liu DJ. Determination of silicon concentration in the plants by colorimetric molybdenum blue method. Mod. Agric. Sci. Technol. 2013;24:173–174. [Google Scholar]
- 27.Van Soest PJ, Robertson JB, Lewis BA. Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber, and nonstarch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. J. Dairy Res. 1991;74(10):3583–3597. doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(91)78551-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Zhou WL, Yi YJ, Tan ZJ, Wang HY, Yang YR, Yu W, Niu YB, Yi ZX, Wang CY. Compensation benefits analysis for oxygen supply of bast fiber seedling film matted on the bottom surface of seedling plate. J. Agric. Sci. Technol. 2018;20(11):79–84. [Google Scholar]
- 29.Liu Q, Wang CY, Yi YJ, Zhou WL, Wang HY, Tan ZJ. Effects of bast fiber seedling film on quality and root respiration enzyme activities of seedlings of different rice varieties. Agric. Sci. Technol. 2016;17(11):2457–2461. doi: 10.16175/j.cnki.1009-4229.2016.11.006. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Liu QH, Sun ZW, Xin CY, Zhao QL, Wang Y, Zhou XB, Ma JQ. Effects of foliar application of silicon on dry matter production and grain yield of rice. Shandong Agric. Sci. 2017;49(5):86–87. doi: 10.14083/j.issn.1001-4942.2017.05.018. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Wang CY, Yi YJ, Zhou WL, Cheng JP, Zhao F, Li M, Wang HY. Effects of bast fiber film mat on seedling root growth and yield of machine-transplanted rice. J. Chin. Agric. Mech. 2013;34(6):84–88. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-5553.2013.06.022. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Zhou WL, Yi YJ, Wang HY, Tan ZJ, Yang YR, Wang CY. Effects of mulching and seeding on the quality and yield of rice seedlings. China Rice. 2017;5:58–62. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-8082.2017.05.013. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Zhou WL, Wang CY, Yi YJ, Liu Q, Wang HY, Tan ZJ. The effect of the hemp fiber membrane and the bottom of the seedling fertilization on the quality of rice seedling transplanted seedlings. J. North China Agric. Univ. 2016;1:191–197. doi: 10.7668/hbnxb.2016.01.031. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Li GY, Aubrey DP, Sun HZ. Predictive capability of a leaf optical meter for determining leaf pigment status during senescence. Photosynthetica. 2017;55(3):543–552. doi: 10.1007/s11099-016-0678-8. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Liu ST, Huang YW, Xu H. Genetic enhancement of lodging resistance in rice due to the key cell wall polymer lignin, which affects stem characteristics. Breed. Sci. 2018;68:508–515. doi: 10.1270/jsbbs.18050. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]