Cancer-Preventive Role of Bone Marrow-Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells on Colitis-Associated Colorectal Cancer: Roles of Gut Microbiota Involved

Abstract

Background

Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) treatment showed promising results in inflammatory bowel disease in both rodent models and patients. Nevertheless, previous studies conducted conflicting results on preclinical tumor models treated with MSCs concerning their influence on tumor initiation and progression. This study is designed to demonstrate the role of bone marrow-derived MSCs and the potential mechanism in the colitis-associated colon cancer (CAC) model.

Methods

Bone marrow-derived MSCs were isolated from green fluorescent protein-transgenic mice, cultured, and identified by flow cytometry. Azoxymethane and dextran sulfate sodium were administrated to establish the CAC mouse model, and MSCs were infused intraperitoneally once per week. The mice were weighed weekly, and colon length, tumor number, and average tumor size were assessed after the mice were killed. MSC localization was detected by immunofluorescence staining; tumor cell proliferation and apoptosis were measured by immunohistochemistry staining of Ki-67 and terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase deoxyuridine triphosphate nick end labeling assay, respectively. The colonic tumor tissues were isolated for RNA-seq, and fecal samples were collected for 16S ribosomal RNA sequencing of the microbiome.

Results

After injection intraperitoneally, MSCs migrated to the intestine and inhibited the initiation of colitis-associated colorectal cancer. This inhibition effect was marked by less weight loss, longer colon length, and reduced tumor numbers. Moreover, MSCs reduced tumor cell proliferation and induced tumor cell apoptosis. Furthermore, MSCs could inhibit chronic inflammation assessed by RNA-sequencing and promote gut microbiome normalization detected by 16S ribosomal RNA sequencing.

Conclusion

The results proved that MSCs could migrate to the colon, inhibit chronic inflammation, and regulate gut microbiome dysbiosis to suppress the development of CAC.

Introduction

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third leading cause of cancer and the second-highest cause of cancer mortality globally (Bray et al., 2018). A key driver of the progression of CRC is chronic inflammation (Keum and Giovannucci, 2019). Patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), referred to as a chronic inflammatory disease, have an increased risk for a type of CRC known as colitis-associated colon cancer (CAC) (Chumanevich et al., 2010; Jess et al., 2012). The risk of developing CAC can be effectively reduced by anti-inflammatory medications (Van Staa et al., 2005; Vendramini-Costa and Carvalho, 2012); however, long-term use is limited because of their life-threatening adverse effects (Wang and DuBois, 2013); therefore, there is an urgent need to explore new anti-inflammatory therapeutic approaches to cancer.

Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs), which are multipotent stem cells, possess the capacity for long-term self-renewal and multidirectional differentiation (Sekiya et al., 2002). Moreover, MSCs can migrate to an inflammatory or tumor site and display profound immune-modulatory (Bouffi et al., 2010; Chiossone et al., 2016; Gao et al., 2016; Chow et al., 2017; Wheat et al., 2017). It has been reported that intravenous or intraperitoneal injection of MSCs could significantly reduce colonic inflammation in both colitis rodent and IBD patients (Liang et al., 2011; Anderson et al., 2013; Park et al., 2015; Lee et al., 2016; Cao et al., 2017). However, there have been conflicting results on preclinical tumor models treated with MSCs concerning their influence on tumor development. We summarized all the studies relating to MSCs and colon cancer (Table 1; Shinagawa et al., 2010; Liu et al., 2011; Tsai et al., 2011; De Boeck et al., 2013; Huang et al., 2013; Chen et al., 2014; Mele et al., 2014; Nasuno et al., 2014; Rhyu et al., 2015; Tang et al., 2015; Wang et al., 2015; Widder et al., 2016) and found that studies demonstrating that MSCs promote tumors were based on the subcutaneous implantation of human cancer cell lines into an immunodeficient nude mouse model, which is not representative of the clinicopathology. Regarding this, the azoxymethane (AOM)/dextran sulfate sodium (DSS) mouse model, which closely mimics the mechanisms of human CAC, is an appropriate animal model for studying preclinical insights on the impact of molecular markers (De Robertis et al., 2011). Although several studies had already demonstrated that MSCs could be therapeutically effective in this CAC mouse model (Chen et al., 2014; Nasuno et al., 2014; Tang et al., 2015), Chen et al. (2014) found that MSCs inhibited tumor number through IL-6-STAT3 signaling; Tang et al. (2015) showed that MSCs suppressed the development of CAC through regulating the differentiation of Treg cells via Smad2, whereas Nasuno et al. (2014) demonstrated that MSCs inhibited tumor initiation by affecting tumor cell-cycle machinery; however, the protective mechanisms have not been fully defined.

TABLE 1.

Key finding from studies using MSCs to treat colon cancer.

Author	Isolation	Tumor model	Findings
Tumor promoting
Wang et al., 2015	Human BMD-MSC	Subcutaneous xenograft ± coinjected MSC	Secretion of IL-8 by MSCs promotes tumor growth
Widder et al., 2016	Human BMD-MSC	Subcutaneous xenograft ± coinjected MSC	Secretion of β1-integrity by CRC participates in the effect of MSCs
Mele et al., 2014	Human BMD-MSC	Subcutaneous xenograft ± coinjected MSC	MSCs triggered EMT, mediated by TGF-β expressed on MSCs
De Boeck et al., 2013	Human BMD-MSC	Subcutaneous xenograft ± coinjected MSC	MSCs affected tumor initiation and growth
Huang et al., 2013	Not specified	Subcutaneous xenograft ± coinjected MSC	MSCs increased tumor growth rate and angiogenesis
Liu et al., 2011	Mouse BMD-MSC	Subcutaneous xenograft ± coinjected MSC	MSCs enhanced tumor growth
Tsai et al., 2011	Human BMD-MSC	Subcutaneous xenograft ± coinjected MSC	MSCs derived IL-6 promoted tumor formation
Shinagawa et al., 2010	Human BMD-MSC	Orthotopic colon cancer ± coinjected MSC	MSCs promoted tumor growth and liver metastasis
Tumor inhibiting
Chen et al., 2014	Mouse BMD-MSC	AOM/DSS ± MSC	MSCs inhibited tumor number through IL-6-STAT3 signaling
Tang et al., 2015	Umbilical cord blood	AOM/DSS ± MSC	MSCs inhibited tumor initiation by inhibiting inflammatory cytokine production
Nasuno et al., 2014	Rat BMD-MSC	AOM/DSS ± MSC	MSCs inhibited tumor initiation by affecting tumor cell-cycle machinery
Rhyu et al., 2015	Rat BMD-MSC	Subcutaneous allograft ± MSC	MSCs inhibited the outgrowth of the rat colon carcinoma and induced greater monocyte infiltration

BMD-MSC, bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cell; CRC, colorectal cancer; EMT, epithelial to mesenchymal transition; AOM, azoxymethane; DSS, dextran sulfate sodium.

Gut microbes are involved in the intestinal defense function and the immune system maturation, whereas gut microbiome dysbiosis participates in the pathogenesis of IBD and CRC (Jostins et al., 2012; Flemer et al., 2018). Soontararak et al. (2018) demonstrated that MSCs could ameliorate colonic inflammation and gut microbiome dysbiosis in mouse IBD models. So, we hypothesized that MSCs could ameliorate CAC through modulating both immunity and the gut microbiome.

In this experiment, we aimed to elucidate the cancer-preventive role and mechanisms of MSCs in a CAC mouse model induced with AOM and DSS. We found MSC administration attenuated adenoma initiation, decreased chronic inflammation, and regulate gut microbiota dysbiosis.

Materials and Methods

Mice

Male C57BL/6 mice (6 weeks old) were purchased from Beijing Huafukang Biotechnology Co., Ltd. (Beijing, China). The animals were kept in specific pathogen-free conditions at room temperature 22 ± 2°C and 55 ± 5% relative humidity under a light/dark cycle for 12 h. Water and feed were supplied ad libitum during the whole experiment. The current experiment was approved by the Animal Care and Use Committee of Tongji Medical College of Huazhong University of Science and Technology (permission number: 2016-0057). All procedures were conducted in concordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and the Chinese Ministry of Health (document no. 55, 2001).

Animal Treatment

Mice were kept for 1 week without any procedure and randomly assigned to three groups (n = 10/group): (1) control group (Con), (2) AOM/DSS group (AD), and (3) MSC group [AME, AOM/DSS treatment, and MSC injection (2 × 10⁶ per mice, intraperitoneal)]. To establish AOM- and DSS-induced CAC mouse model (Vendramini-Costa and Carvalho, 2012), 10 mg/kg AOM (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, United States) were intraperitoneally injected at the beginning of week 0, and 2.5% DSS (molecular weight 36–50 kDa; MP Biomedicals, Solon, OH, United States) was then dissolved in their drinking water every day for 1 week at the start of week 1, followed by normal drinking water for next 2 weeks; thus, DSS was administrated at weeks 1–2, 4–5, and 7–8 for the whole experiment. The MSC [2 × 10⁶ cells in 0.2-ml phosphate-buffered saline (PBS)] was injected once per week during the study, whereas 0.2-ml pure PBS was injected in the control group and AOM/DSS group mice accordingly. Body weight was measured and recorded weekly. The mice were killed after anesthesia at week 10. After colon length was recorded, colons were incised longitudinally; fecal contents were collected and then washed for further analysis. The tumor number was counted, and the tumor size was measured using a caliper. Tumor tissues were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde and subsequently used for hematoxylin and eosin (H&E), immunohistochemistry, and immunofluorescence. The other tissues were stored for further analysis.

Culture and Identification of Mesenchymal Stem Cells

Male C57BL/6 green fluorescent protein (GFP)-transgenic mice (3–4 weeks old) were purchased from Cyagen Biosciences (Cyagen Biosciences Inc., Guangzhou, China). Bone marrow-derived MSCs were isolated from the GFP-transgenic mice as previously described (Lin et al., 2020). Briefly, mice were killed after anesthesia, soaked in 75% ethanol for 3 min. Femurs and tibias were separated and removed of muscle and connective tissues; bone marrow was flushed out by using a 1-ml sterile syringe with a complete culture medium consisting of low glucose Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (Gibco, Carlsbad, CA, United States) with 10% fetal bovine serum (Gibco^® Cell Culture, Melbourne, VIC, Australia) and 1% penicillin/streptomycin (Gibco, Carlsbad, CA, United States). The cell suspension was centrifuged at 300 × g for 5 min, then removed the supernatant and resuspended the cells with the complete culture medium mentioned earlier and plated in T25 cell culture dishes (Nest, Shanghai, China). The supernatant was changed every other day to discard the non-adherent cells. When adherent cells reached more than 80%, 0.25% trypsin–ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid solution (Gibco, Carlsbad, CA, United States) was used to digest cells for 5 min, and collected cells were subcultured. Cells at three to six passages were used for the subsequent experiments.

To identify the surface markers of MSCs obtained earlier, flow cytometry (FCM) analysis was performed. Briefly, cells were collected and washed by PBS two times. Cells were then incubated with fluorescein isothiocyanate-conjugated anti-mouse Sca-1, CD11b, CD45, PE-conjugated CD73, CD90, and APC-conjugated CD44, CD105 (BD Bioscience, NJ, United States) in the dark for 40 min at 4°C. To detect the GFP expression of MSCs, normal MSCs isolated from male C57BL/6 mice were used as control. Cells were washed and resuspended in 100-μl PBS; then, cells were examined using a flow cytometer (BD PharMingen, San Diego, CA, United States). One thousand viable events were collected and analyzed using FlowJo V10 software (Tree Star, Ashland, OR, United States).

Hematoxylin and Eosin Staining

Colonic specimens were immersed in 4% paraformaldehyde for 24 h, then embedded in paraffin and dehydrated in ethanol using standard procedures (Hong et al., 2010); 5-μm sections were stained with H&E and examined and photographed with a light microscope.

Immunohistochemistry

Paraffin-embedded sections (5 μm) were deparaffinized and rehydrated through graded alcohols; antigen heat retrieval was conducted in citrate buffer using a pressure cooker and then cooled down to room temperature; hydrogen peroxide solution was then used to block endogenous peroxidase. The slides were incubated overnight with an antibody against mouse Ki67 (1:200, Abcam, Cambridge, MA, United States) at 4°C. Wash the slides with PBS, horseradish peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibody was added to the slides and co-incubated for 2 h; the slides were then incubated for 10 min using DAB kit following the manufacturer’s instructions (Boshide, Wuhan, China) and counterstained with hematoxylin for 2 min. Sections were observed and photographed using a light microscope.

Terminal Deoxynucleotidyl Transferase Deoxyuridine Triphosphate Nick End Labeling Assay

The terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase deoxyuridine triphosphate nick end labeling (TUNEL) method was used to detect tumor cellular apoptosis in paraffin-embedded sections (5 μm). TUNEL apoptosis detection kit (Roche, Indianapolis, IN, United States) was applied following the manufacturer’s instruction, and the slides were examined and photographed by fluorescence microscope.

Immunofluorescence Staining

Paraffin-embedded sections (5 μm) were dewaxed and rehydrated through graded alcohols; antigen heat retrieval was conducted in citrate buffer using a pressure cooker and then cooled down to room temperature; 10% donkey serum was then used to block endogenous antigen for 30 min. The slides were incubated overnight with an antibody against mouse GFP (1:200, Abcam, Cambridge, MA, United States) at 4°C. The slides were washed with PBS, incubated with Alexa Fluor 488 conjugated donkey anti-mouse secondary antibodies (Antigen Biotech Co., Ltd., Wuhan, China) for 1 h, and 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole was used to stain nuclei. Images were photographed by fluorescence microscope.

RNA Sequencing

The colonic tumor tissues of AOM/DSS and MSC groups were collected and flash-frozen in a −80°C freezer. Total RNA extraction and RNA sequencing were performed by Shenzhen BGI Institute (BGI-Shenzhen, China) using the BGIseq500 platform. SOAPnuke (v1.5.2) was used to filter data, and high-quality reads were aligned to the mice reference genome performed by Bowtie2 (v2.2.5). The expression levels of each gene were normalized to fragments per kilobase million (FPKM). DEGSeq2 (v1.4.5) was used to analyze differential expression gene (DEG) analysis with a Q value ≤ 0.05; pheatmap (v1.0.8) was used to draw heatmap according to FPKM in different samples. Then, the Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) enrichment analysis of DEGs was conducted by Phyper based on the hypergeometric test. Q value with a strict threshold (Q value ≤ 0.05) by Bonferroni was used to correct the significant levels of terms and pathways.

Enzyme-Linked Immune Sorbent Assay Analysis

Serous concentrations of tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), interleukin (IL)1β, and IL6 were measured by enzyme-linked immune sorbent assay (eBioscience, Thermo Fisher Scientific, United States) according to the manufacturer’s manuals. The absorbance was obtained at relative nanometer wavelength using a microplate reader (BioTek Instruments, Inc., Winooski, VT, United States).

16S Ribosomal RNA Sequencing of Fecal Microbiota

The fecal contents were collected after the killing of mice for further analysis. Total fecal DNA extraction and 16S ribosomal RNA (rRNA) sequencing were conducted by the GENEWIZ Institute (Suzhou, China) using the Illumina MiSeq platform. QIIME (v1.9.1) was applied to filter the sequencing data, whereas Vsearch (v1.9.6) was used to cluster the high-quality sequences with a 97% read identity into operational taxonomic units. To determine differences of fecal microbiota between the AOM/DSS and MSC groups, we analyzed the α diversity and β diversity by QIIME. Chao1 and Simpson indices were assessed to determine α diversity, which refers to the diversity within sample community species richness. Unweighted UniFrac distances were applied to characterize β diversity, which represents dissimilarity among different treatment groups. Principal coordinate analysis (PCoA) plot and analysis of similarities (ANOSIM) were used to calculate the β diversity visually. Linear discriminant analysis effect size (LEfSe)¹ was used to screen different species between different groups. Linear discriminant analysis value > 2 and P < 0.05 were considered statistically significant in LEfSe). Interactions between fecal bacterial species (or between fecal bacterial species and differential expression genes) were assessed by Spearman correlation (R v3.5.1) (Supplementary Figure 1).

Statistical Analysis

All data were expressed as means ± standard error of the mean. SPSS software (v22.0) and GraphPad Prism software (v8.0) were used for statistical analysis and picture drawing. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Data Availability

All the sequence data in this study are available in the Sequence Read Archive (SRA) database (SRA accession number of RNA-seq data: SPR305475; SRA accession number of 16S rRNA sequencing data: SPR305592).

Results

Phenotypic Characteristics of Mesenchymal Stem Cells

Mesenchymal stem cells were isolated from bone marrow tissues of GFP-transgenic mice and identified by fluorescence microscope and FCM. Spindle-shaped cells were observed, and all the cells expressed green fluorescence visualized by fluorescence microscope (Supplementary Figure 2A); isolated MSCs were confirmed by FCM for positive for CD105, CD73, CD90, CD44, and Sca-1 but negative for CD11b and CD45. Meanwhile, GFP expression was also identified by FCM (Supplementary Figure 2B).

Mesenchymal Stem Cell Migrated to the Colon and Reduced the Initiation of Colon Tumors Induced by Azoxymethane/Dextran Sulfate Sodium

To investigate the effect of MSCs on CAC, an AOM/DSS-induced CAC model was administrated with MSCs. The experimental process is shown in Figure 1A. Mice received the administration of AOM and DSS showed significant weight loss and bloody diarrhea. Colon tumors were mainly located from the middle colon to the distal rectum, which is the predominant location of human colorectal cancer. As shown in Figure 1B, the MSC group had less weight loss compared with the AOM/DSS group. In addition, compared with the control group, the AOM/DSS group showed more notable colon shortening. However, MSC significantly prevented colonic shortening induced by AOM/DSS (Figures 1C,D). Furthermore, fewer tumors were found in mice infused with MSCs compared with that in AOM/DSS mice (Figures 1D,E). Interestingly, there was no significant difference in the average tumor size between the two groups (Figure 1F).

FIGURE 1.

MSCs administration reduced the initiation of colon tumors induced by AOM/DSS in mice. (A) Experimental process of AOM/DSS-induced colon tumors and MSC injection procedure. (B) Body weight. (C) Colon length. (D) Representative macroscopic images of colons and tumors. (E) Total tumor numbers in each group. (F) Average tumor size in each group. Data are expressed as mean ± SEM, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001, n = 10 mice per group.

GFP-MSCs were used to trace its localization in colon tissues. As shown in Figure 2, MSCs were not detected in colonic tissues in AOM/DSS group but can be detected in colonic tissues in the MSC group, which indicated that MSCs migrated to colon tissues when mice had intestinal damage.

FIGURE 2.

MSCs migrated to colonic tissues. (A) and (B) show colon tissues stained to explore the migration of MSCs in each group (scare bar, 50 μm).

Colon tissues were stained with H&E, and mucosal damage and colonic inflammation in mice were histologically observed. In the sections of the AOM/DSS group, distorted crypt epithelial, extensive mucosal injury, and massive inflammatory cell infiltration were found. In contrast, the MSC group showed reduced structural disruption and immune cell infiltration compared with the AOM/DSS group (Figure 3A).

FIGURE 3.

MSC administration regulated tumor cells. (A) H&E staining of colon sections in each group. (B,C) Ki-67 staining of tumor section in each group. (D,E) TUNEL staining of tumor section in each group. Each group randomly selected five tumor tissues and calculated the positive cells. Data are expressed as mean ± SEM, ***P < 0.001.

Excessive proliferation and apoptosis inhibition have commonly emerged during the development of colon cancer. To detect the effect of MSCs on tumor cells, the proliferation and apoptosis rates in colon tumor tissues were analyzed. Compared with the AOM/DSS group, the positive rate of Ki-67 in the MSC group was significantly augmented (Figures 3B,C). The number of apoptotic cells reduced in the MSC group than that in the AOM/DSS group as assessed by TUNEL. Therefore, the results suggested that MSC infusion promoted apoptosis and inhibited proliferation in intestinal tumor cells (Figures 3D,E).

Differential Expression of Genes in Intestinal Tumor Tissues After Mesenchymal Stem Cell Injection

RNA-seq analysis was performed to acquire the global transcriptomic profiles to compare the differences of tumor transcriptome between the AOM/DSS group and MSC group. The quality of each sample was shown in Additional File 1 and Supplementary Figure 3. The global transcriptomic profiles of FPKM of each sample, fold change, and Q value of AD and AME groups were presented in Additional File 2. Hierarchical clustering analysis was performed according to the FPKM of each sample. As shown in Figure 4A, the samples of AOM/DSS mice were clustered into the AD group, whereas the samples of MSCs injection mice were clustered into the AME group. Differential expression gene analysis was performed, and 878 DEGs were obtained in the MSC group compared with that of the AOM/DSS group (262 upregulated genes and 616 downregulated genes) (Figure 4B). Subsequently, we used the KEGG to analyze the biological signaling pathways involved in the 616 downregulated genes. As shown in Figures 4C,D, KEGG enrichment analysis revealed that “cell adhesion molecules,” “T cell receptor signaling pathway,” and “cytokine–cytokine receptor interaction” were the three top signaling pathways involved (Additional File 3). Thus, RNA-seq analysis helps to elucidate that immune responses participate in the mechanism of MSCs to reduce tumor initiation.

FIGURE 4.

Differential expression of genes in intestinal tumor tissues. (A) Hierarchical clustering analysis was performed according to the FPKM of each sample. (B) Volcano plot of DEGs in MSC group compared with AOM/DSS group. (C) KEGG enrichment analysis was conducted for downregulated genes in MSC group compared with AOM/DSS group. (D) Genes in the three top signaling pathways. (E–G) Expression of TNF-α, IL-1β, and IL-6 in serum was detected by enzyme-linked immune sorbent assay. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001. n = 3 mice per group.

Chronic inflammation is the key driver of the CAC; the RNA-seq transcriptome study demonstrated that MSCs reduce tumor initiation through immune responses, so we detected pro-inflammatory cytokines TNF-α, IL-1β, and IL-6 in serum to determine the systematic immune responses. As shown in Figures 4E–G, the expressions of cytokines in mice sera were lower in the MSC group compared with that of the AOM/DSS group.

Mesenchymal Stem Cells Altered the Composition of Intestinal Flora in Mice

It has been reported that MSCs could regulate gut microbiome dysbiosis in mouse colitis model, so we predicted that MSCs could also change the intestinal flora of CAC mice induced by AOM/DSS. Fecal contents of killed mice were collected, and 16S rRNA sequencing was conducted to explore the effect of MSCs on the gut microbiota of CAC mice. α-Diversity of the gut microbiome was not affected by MSCs, which is evaluated by Chao1 and Shannon indexes, respectively (Figures 5A,B). β-Diversity, assessed by PCoA of the unweighted and ANOSIM, showed that the two groups were clearly clustered into two separate groups (Figure 5C). In summary, we found a dissimilarity of gut bacteria between the AOM/DSS and MSC groups.

FIGURE 5.

MSCs altered the composition of intestinal flora in mice. (A,B) α-Diversity measured by Chao1 and Shannon indexes (P > 0.05). (C) β-diversity measured by PCoA based on unweighted UniFrac distance and ANOSIM’s analysis. (D) Relative bacterial abundance at phylum levels. (E) Firmicutes to Bacteroidetes ratio. Data are expressed as mean ± SEM, ***P < 0.001, n = 4 mice per group.

As shown in Figure 5D, there are 10 major phyla present in the gut microbiota, both in the AOM/DSS and MSC groups, among which the phylum Bacteroidetes was most predominant. We then analyzed the ratio of Firmicutes/Bacteroidetes, which is usually increased in CAC patients. We observed a reduction of Firmicutes/Bacteroidetes ratio in the MSC group compared with the AOM/DSS group (Figure 5E), which means this feature in CRC could be reversed by MSC administration.

Furthermore, LEfSe was performed to elucidate the specific changes in bacterial taxa after MSC injection. At the genus level, a higher abundance of Staphylococcus, Candidatus Saccharimonas, Acetatifactor, Intestinimonas, and Parabacteroides and a lower abundance of Bilophila and Eubacterium brachy were detected in the MSC group (Figures 6A,B and Additional File 4). Interactions between these genera were then explored using correlation analysis. There was a significant positive relationship between Biophilia and E. branchy and between Acetatifactor and Intestinimonas (Figure 6C).

FIGURE 6.

Fecal microbial community altered after MSCs administration. (A,B) Significant differences of bacteria between the two groups. (C) Correlation between different bacteria at genus level. n = 4 mice per group.

Correlations Between the Bacteria and Differential Expression Genes

Correlation analysis of the seven bacterial genera and 56 DEGs with three signaling pathway parameters was further conducted to analyze the association between gut microbiota and tumor transcriptome. As shown in Figure 7, Bilophila and E. brachy had a significant positive correlation with immune parameters, which indicated that these two genera could promote colitis and tumorigenesis through regulate immunity.

FIGURE 7.

Correlation analysis between differentially expressed genes and bacterial abundance. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001, n = 3 mice per group.

Discussion

Chronic inflammation has been considered as the key driver of CRC (Keum and Giovannucci, 2019), and IBD patients have an increased risk of developing CAC (Chumanevich et al., 2010; Jess et al., 2012). In current years, MSCs have been used in preclinical studies in rodent models and clinical trials in humans to treat IBD and have shown considerable promising results (Liang et al., 2011; Anderson et al., 2013; Park et al., 2015; Lee et al., 2016; Cao et al., 2017). Previous studies also showed that MSCs could migrate to the colon and inhibit CAC. Nasuno et al. (2014) noted that MSCs could reduce the tumor initiation, whereas WNT and TGF-β-Smad signaling pathways were dysregulated in subsequent carcinogenesis, Tang et al. (2015) proved that the differentiation of Treg through Smad2 could be induced by MSCs to suppress the development of CAC, and Chen et al. (2014) determined that MSCs might attenuate the carcinogenesis by reducing pro-inflammatory cytokines release and STAT3 activation. Besides immunological regulation function, MSCs have also been proven to ameliorate gut microbiota dysbiosis (Soontararak et al., 2018), which is considered as another important regulator in the initiation and progression of CRC. Here, our central finding is that MSC administration diminished the initiation of colon tumors in mice through regulating inflammatory status and gut microbiota dysbiosis.

Colitis-associated colon cancer mouse model induced by AOM/DSS mimics the pathological process of human colitis-associated colorectal cancer and has been proven to be valuable in predicting the efficacy of chemical prevention in humans (De Robertis et al., 2011). The significant advantages of the AOM/DSS mouse model are that factors influencing tumor initiation should lead to changes in tumor numbers, whereas factors affecting tumor progression should lead to changes in the average size (Nasuno et al., 2014). Our results found that bone marrow-derived MSC injection significantly reduced the average tumor number per mouse without affecting the average tumor diameter, thus suggesting that MSCs could reduce tumor initiation induced by AOM/DSS rather than tumor progression.

Chronic inflammation functions as the key driver of CAC through inducing gene mutations, promoting proliferation, and reducing apoptosis. In the current experiment, less weight loss, longer colon length, reduced tumor numbers, decreased rate of positive Ki67, and increased rate of apoptotic cells were detected after MSC injection. Furthermore, RNA-seq was performed in colonic tumor tissues, and in the MSC group, immune-associated pathways “cell adhesion molecules,” “T cell receptor signaling pathway,” and “cytokine–cytokine receptor interaction” were significantly reduced. Furthermore, we detected pro-inflammatory cytokines TNF-α, IL-1β, and IL-6 in serum and found that MSCs could reduce the release of pro-inflammatory cytokines in AOM/DSS-induced chronic inflammation. These results together suggest that MSCs can attenuate tumorigenesis by inhibiting chronic inflammation.

A potential secondary mechanism of MSCs involves microbiome alterations. In this study, the administration of MSCs did not change α-diversity but change β-diversity of the gut microbiome, indicating that MSC injection cannot change the abundance but can significantly change diversity. Furthermore, we identified 10 predominant phyla in the gut microbiome: Firmicutes, Bacteroides, Proteobacteria, Actinobacteria, Patescibacteria, Verrucomicrobia, Epsilonbacteraeota, Deferribacteres, Tenericutes, and Cyanobacteria. Among them, Firmicutes and Bacteroides are the two most predominant bacterial phyla. Previous studies suggested that a low Firmicutes/Bacteroides ratio signifies a healthy condition, whereas an increasing ratio of Firmicutes/Bacteroides was observed in CRC patients. Our study demonstrated that MSC treatment led to a significant decrease in the Firmicutes/Bacteroides ratio.

The analysis in genus levels showed an injection of MSCs that increased the abundance of potentially beneficial bacteria and decreased the abundance of potentially harmful bacteria in the gut microbiome of mice. Notably, the abundance of Parabacteroides, Staphylococcus, Acetatifactor, Intestinimonas, and Candidatus Saccharimonas was increased after MSC administration. Parabacteroides in feces was proven to inversely associate with colonic tumor numbers and has anti-inflammatory and anticancer properties (Koh et al., 2018). Staphylococcus is a commensal strain and reportedly triggers apoptosis (Zhang et al., 2017) and may protect against neoplasia (Nakatsuji et al., 2018). Acetatifactor, which is a butyrate bacterium, has been demonstrated to decrease DSS-induced colitis in mice (Kim et al., 2020) and has been proven to be a benefit in anticancer activities (Xu et al., 2020). Intestinimonas, another butyrate bacterium, was shown a lower abundance in patients with CRC (Loke et al., 2018) and mice with IBS (Song et al., 2020). A lower abundance of Candidatus Saccharimonas has been noted in hypertriglyceridemia-related acute necrotizing pancreatitis in rats (Huang et al., 2017) and high-fat diet-fed mice (Wang et al., 2020), indicating a potential anti-inflammatory role of Candidatus Saccharimonas.

Administration of MSCs decreased the level of E. branchy and Bilophila. E. branchy was first isolated from subgingival samples (Vincent et al., 1984) and was proven to stimulate IL-23-related immune responses (Moutsopoulos et al., 2015), which has been identified as a pivotal role in the pathogenesis of IBD and CAC (Neurath, 2019). Bilophila, an opportunistic pathogen, has been proven to increase in rodent models of IBD (Cai et al., 2019) and IBD patients (Yilmaz et al., 2018). Taken together, our results showed MSCs could promote beneficial microbiome alterations to cancel colitis-associated tumorigenesis.

It is well-known that intestinal microbiota plays a crucial part in stimulating local immune responses. The protective effect of MSCs may be attributed to the host transcriptome changes mediated by the altered gut microbiome. Based on the RNA sequencing data and 16S rRNA sequencing analysis, we studied the complex interaction between the host transcriptome profile and fecal microbiota. MSC injection can inhibit inflammation and suppress the immune response, augment the abundance of Intestinimonas and Candidatus Saccharimonas, and decrease the abundance of Bilophila and E. branchy. Moreover, we found that there is something significantly positive between Bilophila and E. branchy with the downregulated differential genes, suggesting that these two genera could promote colitis and tumorigenesis through regulate immunity. In accordance with previous studies, Bilophila had inherent pro-inflammatory properties (Devkota et al., 2012; Feng et al., 2017), whereas E. branchy was proven to stimulate IL-23-related immune responses (Moutsopoulos et al., 2015); however, the contribution and relative importance of Bilophila’s pro-inflammatory properties in CAC condition is unknown. More researches are needed in the future to elucidate the contributions of these gut bacteria in the cancer-preventive role of MSCs.

To sum up, this study suggested that the use of MSCs suppressed inflammation, inhibited tumor cell proliferation, and promoted apoptosis in AOM/DSS mice. Furthermore, MSCs did not change the abundance but changed the diversity and composition of the intestinal microbiome, decreased the Firmicutes/Bacteroides ratio, increased the number of the potential beneficial bacterium, and decreased the opportunistic pathogen. Thus, MSCs may be a promising strategy for colitis-associated colorectal cancer.

Data Availability Statement

The names of the repository/repositories and accession number(s) can be found below: SRA accession number of RNAseq data: PRJNA700873; SRA accession number of 16S rRNA sequencing data: PRJNA700826.

Ethics Statement

The animal study was reviewed and approved by the Animal Care and Use Committee of Tongji Medical College of Huazhong University of Science and Technology (Permission Number: 2016-0057).

Author Contributions

RH: conceptualization, methodology, project administration, and manuscript writing. CH: data curation, investigation, and funding acquisition. YL: software and validation. WQ: resources and visualization. XH: conceptualization, funding acquisition, manuscript review, and editing. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Supplementary Material

The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fcell.2021.642948/full#supplementary-material