Skip to main content
Acta Clinica Croatica logoLink to Acta Clinica Croatica
. 2020 Sep;59(3):445–454. doi: 10.20471/acc.2020.59.03.08

Analysis of THREE-year prevalence of oral cavity, neck and head tumors – a retrospective single-centre study

Sinan Rusinovci 1, Xhevdet Aliu 1, Tomislav Jukić 2, David Štubljar 3, Naim Haliti 1,
PMCID: PMC8212654  PMID: 34177054

SUMMARY

The purpose of the study was to retrospectively analyze the prevalence of oral cavity, neck and head tumors recorded at our department over a period of 3 years. Retrospective analysis included archival data on cancer patients treated at our department during the 2015-2017 period. A total of 1005 patients with proven carcinomas were selected for final analysis. Cancers were detected by ultrasound, x-ray, biopsy and clinical diagnosis. The mean age of patients was 58.4±19.3 years. The majority of cases (n=264; 26.3%) were detected in the 7th decade of life. The most common cancers were basal cell carcinoma in 374 (37.2%) and squamous cell carcinoma in 228 (22.7%) cases. The male-to-female ratio was 1.7:1. There was no statistically significant age difference between genders. Recurrence of tumor occurred in 31 patients. The most common risk factor in both groups was sun exposure. The most common sites were lower lip, cheek and frontal region in men, and cheek region and nose in women (p<0.001). Men were found to be more susceptible to cancer development. This study showed differences between age groups, i.e. elderly patients had a much higher probability of developing cancer as compared to younger patients.

Key words: Three-year data, Prevalence, Oral cancers, Risk factors, Retrospective analysis

Introduction

Oral cancers are malignant neoplasms that develop in the tissues of the mouth (1). Oral cancers are the 6th most common malignancy worldwide. Despite the general global trend of a slight decrease in the incidence of oral cancers, the incidence of tongue cancer is increasing (2). About 90% of all tumors are histologically subtyped as oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC), which is the most common type of oral cancer. Each year, about 275,000 cases are newly diagnosed worldwide, reporting 128,000 deaths annually (3). In the European Union, there is an estimate of 66,650 new cases each year (4). At an early stage, OSCC has a survival rate of 80% in comparison to late stages (T3-T4) when the survival rate is only 20%-30% (5). The incidence varies by geographic regions, and more than half of all cases occur in developing countries (6); however, in the last decade, an increase has been observed in the percentage of young patients (2).

Early diagnosis of oral cancer is the most important factor affecting overall survival and prognosis. Several countries in Europe have shown a significant increase in the prevalence of oral cancer, especially in men. Oral cancer is more common in men and usually occurs after the 5th decade of life (4). For instance, in Europe, head and neck cancers are the 4th most common group of cancers among men (7). France has one of the highest incidence rates; in 2012, the world-standardized incidence for men was 21.5 cases per 100,000 person-years and in France over 35 cases per 100,000 person-years for men (8, 9).

Apart from tobacco and alcohol, dietary factors, human papillomavirus (HPV) infection, genetic factors, and oral hygiene have also been reported as risk factors. Social inequalities were related to oral cavity cancers, linked to factors directly affecting behavior and lifestyle of different genders (3, 10). Studies have reported an alarming lack of awareness about oral cancer, symptoms and early diagnosis. The lack of such knowledge needs to be addressed by further public education, and possibly targeted at high-risk groups (11). Tobacco and alcohol consumption are still the principal etiologic factors for the development of squamous cell carcinoma (SCC). However, in addition, a variety of suspected risk factors such as chronic irritation, poor oral hygiene, viral infection, occupational exposure, nutrition, and genetic factors have been proposed for the development of oral cancer (12-16).

The aims of this study were to retrospectively analyze the prevalence of oral cavity, neck and head carcinoma and evaluate the number of different types of cancers encountered at our department over a 3-year period (2015-2017).

Materials and Methods

The study was designed as retrospective analysis of data from the Department of Maxillofacial Surgery, University Clinical Center of Kosovo, Prishtina, Kosovo. The research was conducted in full accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki on medical protocols and ethics. The study was approved by the Prishtina Faculty of Medicine Review Board. Patient consent for participation was not required since data were retrieved from our archive database, protecting privacy and confidentiality of patient data.

The archive contained number of cancer patients treated at our department from 2015 to 2017. A total of 1005 patients with proven carcinomas of the oral cavity, neck and head were selected for final analysis. Cancers were detected by ultrasound, x-ray, biopsy and clinical diagnosis. Cases were divided into groups according to histopathologic diagnosis of cancer type. Statistical analysis was performed by Statistical Package of Social Sciences SPSS 21 (IBM, New York, USA). Student’s t-test and Pearson’s χ2-test were performed according to the type of variable. Cox regression was calculated for the evaluation of hazard ratio (HR) between independent and dependent variables. Statistical significance for all tests was set at p<0.05.

Results

Of the 1005 cases, 936 (93.1%) cases were diagnosed by clinical evaluation, 182 (18.1%) were confirmed by biopsy, 132 (13.1%) were confirmed by imaging (computed tomography, orthopan, craniogram), and 56 (5.6%) with ultrasound. The mean age of the study patients was 58.4±19.3 years. The majority of cases (n=264; 26.3%) were detected in the 7th decade of life (60-69 age group). Altogether 580 (57.7%) cases were elderly people aged ≥60 (Fig. 1). Furthermore, 19 (1.9%) cases were detected in children aged ≤9 years.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Age distribution of patients with oral and maxillofacial tumors.

In cancer patients, the most common type of occupation was retirement (n=467; 46.5%) and field worker (n=207; 20.6%) (Table 1). We did not establish the types of field work, since it could contribute to cancer as one of the risk factors. Sun exposure was determined as the most frequent risk factor in more than half of cases. Treated patients had undergone surgery for their primary tumor. Only a minority of them received chemotherapy or radiotherapy (alone or combined). The mean time elapsed from diagnosis to treatment (time-to-treat) was more than 22 months.

Table 1. Basic characteristics of patients with oral and maxillofacial tumors.

Patients with oral and maxillofacial tumors (N=1005)
Age (years) 58.4±19.3
Gender:
  Male/Female 636/369
Year of cancer diagnosis:
  2015 311
  2016 376
  2017 318
Profession:
  Worker 122
  Housewife 122
  Retiree 467
  Pupil 27
  Student 43
  Child <6 years 17
  Field worker 207
Birthplace:
  Village 679
  City 326
Risk factors:
  Sun exposure 518
  Tobacco 57
  Alcohol 12
  Viral infection 4
  Chemical materials 4
  No data 201
  Multiple factors 209
Family history 59
Time-to-treat (months), mean 22.3±27.8
Time-to-treat (months), median 8.5±0.9
Treatment:
  Surgery 985
  Chemotherapy 1
  Radiotherapy 1
  Medications 17

The most common oral cancer was basal cell carcinoma (BCC), found in 374 (37.2%) cases, followed by SCC in 228 (22.7%) cases as the second most prevalent cancer. Other types of cancers are listed in Table 2.

Table 2. Prevalence and types of cancer diagnosed during 3-year period (2015-2017).

Histology of cancer Total number of cancers (N=1005)
Adenocystic carcinoma 1 (0.1%)
Pleomorphic adenoma 7 (0.7%)
Adenoma sebaceum 2 (0.2%)
Ameloblastoma 3 (0.3%)
Angiofibroma 5 (0.5%)
Hemangioma, calcifying 1 (0.1%)
Basal cell epithelioma 1 (0.1%)
Lymph node metastatic carcinoma 5 (0.5%)
Mucoepidermoid carcinoma 2 (0.2%)
Sebaceous carcinoma 1 (0.1%)
Verrucous carcinoma 6 (0.6%)
Basal cell carcinoma 284 (28.3%)
Adenoid basal cell carcinoma 53 (5.3%)
Basal cell carcinoma, cornifying 2 (0.2%)
Basal cell carcinoma cutis 3 (0.3%)
Basal cell carcinoma with squamous metaplasia 1 (0.1%)
Basal cell carcinoma, pigmented 2 (0.2%)
Basal cell carcinoma, adenoid cystic 3 (0.3%)
Basal cell carcinoma, adenoid keratinizing 1 (0.1%)
Basal cell carcinoma, fibrotic 3 (0.3%)
Basal cell carcinoma, hyperkeratotic 1 (0.1%)
Basal cell carcinoma, keratinizing 2 (0.2%)
Basal cell carcinoma, keratotic 2 (0.2%)
Basal cell carcinoma, superficial 17 (1.7%)
Chalazion 1 (0.1%)
Epidermal inclusion cyst 1 (0.1%)
Clear cell hidradenoma 2 (0.2%)
Squamous cell carcinoma 204 (20.3%)
Squamous cell carcinoma, corneal 7 (0.7%)
Squamous cell carcinoma, cornifying 15 (1.5%)
Lymph node metastatic squamous cell carcinoma 1 (0.1%)
Squamous cell carcinoma, non corneal 1 (0.1%)
Cylindroma 2 (0.2%)
Dermatofibroma 1 (0.1%)
Dermatofibrosarcoma 2 (0.2%)
Fibrous dysplasia 5 (0.5%)
Epulis 3 (0.3%)
Fibromatous epulis 3 (0.3%)
Giant cell epulis 9 (0.9%)
Fibroepithelial polyp 2 (0.2%)
Fibrohistiocytoma 1 (0.1%)
Fibrolipoma 17 (1.7%)
Fibropapilloma 2 (0.2%)
Fibromyxoma 1 (0.1%)
Pyogenic granuloma 20 (2.0%)
Hemangioma 5 (0.5%)
Capillary hemangioma 9 (0.9%)
Cavernous hemangioma 4 (0.4%)
Verrucous hemangioma, partial 1 (0.1%)
Sclerosing hemangioma 4 (0.4%)
Hemangioma simplex 7 (0.7%)
Hemangioma simplex, capillary 1 (0.1%)
Hemangioma simplex, cutaneous 2 (0.2%)
Fibromatous histiocytoma, benign 1 (0.1%)
Hyperkeratosis 16 (1.6%)
Pseudoepitheliomatous hyperplasia 1 (0.1%)
Keratoacanthoma 25 (2.5%)
Keratosis 1 (0.1%)
Actinic keratosis 9 (0.9%)
Seborrheic keratosis 33 (3.3%)
Solar keratosis 10 (1.0%)
Leukoplakia 21 (2.1%)
Lichen planus 3 (0.3%)
Lichen simplex, chronic 1 (0.1%)
Lichenoid solar keratosis 1 (0.1%)
Hodgkin lymphoma 1 (0.1%)
Lipoma 15 (1.5%)
Malignant melanoma, metastatic 4 (0.4%)
Malignant melanoma, nodular 3 (0.3%)
Mucoepidermoid carcinoma 1 (0.1%)
Myoblastoma 1 (0.1%)
Dermal nevus 1 (0.1%)
Epidermodermal nevus 5 (0.5%)
Nevocellular nevus 6 (0.6%)
Pigmented nevus 14 (1.4%)
Pigmented nevus, epidermodermal 15 (1.5%)
Pigmented nevus, intradermal 18 (1.8%)
Sebaceous nevus 3 (0.3%)
Verrucous nevus, intradermal 1 (0.1%)
Antoni A neurilemmoma 1 (0.1%)
Neurofibroma 4 (0.4%)
Nevocellular nevus, intradermal 1 (0.1%)
Non-Hodgkin lymphoma 1 (0.1%)
Osteoma 3 (0.3%)
Papilloma 17 (1.7%)
Papilloma, inflammatory 1 (0.1%)
Papilloma, verrucous 6 (0.6%)
Polyposis 1 (0.1%)
Rhabdomyoma 1 (0.1%)
Sebaceous trichofolliculoma 1 (0.1%)
Sebaceoma 1 (0.1%)
Spindle cell nevus 1 (0.1%)
Syringoma 1 (0.1%)
Benign cystic teratoma 1 (0.1%)
Trichoepithelioma 3 (0.3%)
Trichofolliculoma 1 (0.1%)
Giant cell tumor 1 (0.1%)
Ulcerative eosinophilic granuloma (Riga-Fede disease) 1 (0.1%)
Verruca vulgaris 1 (0.1%)
Warthin tumor (papillary lymphomatous cystadenoma) 1 (0.1%)
No data 5 (0.5%)

The male-to-female ratio of cancer patients was 1.7:1. According to age groups, there was no statistical difference between male and female patients, since most patients of both genders belonged to elderly groups. Recurrence of tumor occurred in 31 patients, but with no statistical gender difference. However, 50 men had multiple-site tumors compared to 15 cases in women (p=0.019). The most common risk factor in both groups was sun exposure and contribution of multiple factors, mostly a combination of sun exposure, alcohol and tobacco use (Table 3).

Table 3. Characteristics of cancer patients according to gender.

Male (N=636) Female (N=369) p-value
Age group (years): 0.582
  0-9 12 7
  10-19 15 15
  20-29 38 26
  30-39 42 21
  40-49 52 24
  50-59 108 52
  60-69 163 99
  70-79 133 84
  80-89 58 29
  90-99 5 6
  No data 10 6
Recurrence 18 13 0.620
Risk factors: <0.001
  Sun exposure 327 188
  Tobacco 40 15
  Alcohol 9 2
  Viral infection 3 1
  Chemical materials 1 3
  Multiple factors 158 47
  No data 98 113
Family history 34 23 0.550
Multi-site 50 15 0.019

Distribution of cancers by anatomic regions was different depending on patient gender (p<0.001) (Table 4). The most common sites were lower lip, cheek region and frontal region in men, and cheek region and nose in women.

Table 4. Distribution of cancers according to anatomic region and patient gender.

Anatomic region Number of patients (N=1005) Percent of patients Male (N=636) Female (N=369)
Lower lip 167 16.6% 139 28
Upper lip 28 2.9% 11 17
Nose 143 14.2% 78 65
Frontal region 114 11.3% 85 29
Cheek region 221 22.0% 115 106
Region covered with hair 92 9.2% 66 26
Parotid gland 6 0.6% 1 5
Palate 5 0.5% 4 1
Medial canthus of eye 10 1.0% 6 4
Lateral canthus of eye 8 0.8% 4 4
Upper eyelid 9 0.9% 5 4
Lower eyelid 9 0.9% 6 3
Neck region 40 4.0% 23 16
Oral mucosa 10 1.0% 4 6
Tongue 17 1.7% 10 7
Gingiva 16 1.6% 3 13
Floor of the mouth 0 0 0 0
Ear 27 2.7% 22 5
Other salivary glands 1 0.1% 0 1
Upper jaw 18 1.8% 13 5
Lower jaw 9 0.9% 7 2
Frontal bone 1 0.1% 0 1
No data 54 5.3% 34 81

In the cheek region, skin carcinoma and carcinomas at buccal site of the mouth and mucosa were identified. As this region was identified most commonly, we calculated HR for independent variables (patient risk factors) to predict the occurrence of cancer in the cheek anatomic region (Table 5). Statistically significant risk factors for cancers in the cheek region were male gender, age 60-69 years, retired and field workers, cancer in only one region, and patients with known risk factors such as sun exposure, tobacco use, or their combination.

Table 5. Predictive values of risk factors with calculated HR with 95% CI for cancer in cheek region.

B HR 95% CI p-value
Gender 0.404 1.497 1.146 1.965 0.003
Age group (years):
  0-9 Reference
  10-19 -1.078 0.340 0,062 1.858 0.213
  20-29 -0.932 0.394 0,098 1.577 0.188
  30-39 -0.443 0.642 0,213 1.940 0.433
  40-49 -0.442 0.643 0,209 1.976 0.440
  50-59 -0.013 0.987 0,342 2.846 0.980
  60-69 -1.232 0.292 0,099 0.859 0.025
  70-79 -0.425 0.654 0,237 1.804 0.412
  80-89 -0.425 0.654 0,236 1.811 0.414
  90-99 -0.210 0.810 0,28 2.343 0.698
Occupation:
  Worker Reference
  Housewife 0.543 1.722 0,951 3.115 0.073
  Retiree 0.798 2.220 1,283 3.844 0.004
  Pupil 0.575 1.778 1,116 2.832 0.015
  Student 0.324 1.383 0,473 4.042 0.553
  Child <6 years 0.997 2.710 1,240 5.923 0.012
  Field worker 1.083 2.953 1,187 7.344 0.020
Birthplace -0.162 0.850 0.642 1.127 0.259
Recurrence -0.540 0.583 0.211 1.609 0.297
Multi-site -0.912 0.402 0.198 0.814 0.011
Risk factors:
  Sun exposure Reference
  Tobacco 0.539 1.714 1,118 2.627 0.013
  Alcohol 0.141 1.151 0,472 2.810 0.757
  Various chemical materials 1.051 2.861 0,387 21.169 0.303
  Multiple 0.808 2.243 1,379 3.648 0.001
Family history -0.132 0.876 0.524 1.464 0.614

*Hazard ratios (HR) were calculated with Cox regression, where presence of cancer was dependent variable; B value was determined as correlation coefficient between independent and dependent variable; 95% CI = 95% confidence interval.

Discussion

The purpose of the current study was to retrospectively analyze the prevalence of oral cavity, neck and head carcinomas, and estimate the prevalence of cancer subtypes at our department over a period of 3 years. The mean age of cancer patients in our study was 58.4 years, which coincided with the findings from UAE (54.9 years) (17), Thailand (59.1 years) (18), Iran (61.2 years) (19), Malaysia (61.2 years) (20), Jordan (62.5 years) (21) and Japan (65.2 years) (22) but higher than data reported from Nigeria (42.2 years) (23) and India (47.8 and 49.7 years) (24, 25). However, the majority of patients (n=580 cases; 57.7%) were elderly people aged >60. As previously confirmed in many other studies (19, 21, 26, 27), male patients predominated with the male to female ratio of 1.7:1 (for example, HR for cheek cancer in male patients was 1.497; p=0.003).

Disparity in the prevalence of different cancer subtypes might be attributable to difference in the distribution of risk factors in each patient or geographical features of the region where the patient lived (17, 23). In our study, alcohol and smoking were not the dominant risk factors. Sun exposure was detected as a risk factor for cancer development in more than 50% of all cases. Kosovo as a geographic region has the Mediterranean climate with lots of sunny days annually. In addition, general perception of sunbathing is that sunlight is not harmful, therefore people do not avoid the mid-day summer sun. For this reason, it would be of great interest to evaluate the prevalence of skin cancer in the population. Most of the oral, neck and head cancers in the present study were located in the cheek region of the head/face, lower lip, nose and frontal region. The reasons apart from risk factors were not determined. We demonstrated that gender, age, sun exposure and tobacco use could statistically contribute to cancer in this region. Previous studies mostly diagnosed cancer on the tongue (17, 19, 22, 28-30). The reasons why the tongue and cheek were the predilection sites for oral cancer in those studies are that the carcinogens mixing with saliva in the oral cavity have a tendency to pool at the bottom of the mouth and these sites are covered by thin and non-keratinized mucosa, thus providing less protection against the carcinogen (31). On the other hand, Chidzonga (32) reports on gingiva as the most common site of oral cancer, followed by the tongue. In our study, tongue and gingiva cancer together accounted for only 3.3% of all cancers. However, Howell et al. (33) report that the most common site of oral cancer in their study was the lip, followed by the tongue, which coincided with our findings regarding lip cancer. The explanation for the high incidence of lip cancer was sun exposure and ultraviolet light overexposure, which also coincided with our results. Australia, where the study was performed, also is a sunny country and its residents, mostly immigrants from Europe, have fair skin complexion and thus higher probability of skin damage. A study from India determined cancer of buccal mucosa as the second most common in their population, attributed to tobacco chewing (25). As a consequence, alveolar mucosa, gingiva and buccal mucosa are constantly in contact with the carcinogens for a long period of time. In our analysis, tobacco was identified as a risk factor in 55 patients.

Regarding cancer subtypes in the present study, BCC accounted for 37.2% and SCC for 22.7% of all oral cancers. These figures are much lower than those reported in several previous studies, which found SCC to account for 84.4% to 90.0% of all oral cancers (2, 19, 20, 29, 33). However, lower figures from 63.0% to 73.1% have also been reported (17, 23, 30, 32), but not under 20% to 25%. Head and neck SCC has been established worldwide as one of the most frequent cancers. Its incidence is 2.5% and it annually contributes to 1.9% of all deaths from cancer. The majority of oral cancers are histologically SCC (34). Head and neck SCC is normally detected in elderly people, but an increasing incidence among younger patients aged <45 has been observed in recent years. However, cancer in younger people is known to be a different clinical entity with different etiologic factors and pathogenesis. There is also a distinctive discrepancy in the estimated proportion of oral cancers in younger patients among different regions, e.g., North America (5.5%), Africa (17.2%) and Middle East (14.5%). Therefore, we need to conduct more population-based incidence studies also in non-Western regions to obtain a more accurate proportion of incidence in younger population, and also to identify the etiologic risk factors for the disease (35). Interestingly, in previous studies on the epithelial tumor category, SCC was the most common tumor and the most common oral cancer (17, 19-27, 29, 32, 33), while mucoepidermoid carcinoma was most prevalent in the salivary gland tumor category (17, 20, 27), whereas in our study it accounted for only 0.1% of all cancers. The prevalence data do differ among countries, however, mostly between the Western countries and third-world countries.

Basal cell carcinoma was proved to be the most frequent subtype in our study, and is also the most common malignancy in Caucasians (36-40), with over two million cases diagnosed in the USA each year (39). It is believed that BCC originates from the basal layer of the epidermis, the interfollicular epidermis and the hair follicle (41). Approximately 95% of individuals are diagnosed with BCC between the age of 40 and 79 years. The incidence is approximately 30% higher in men than in women. The risk factors include fair skin pigmentation, sun radiation (ultraviolet and/or ionizing), exposure to arsenic or polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, immunosuppression, scars, and certain genetic syndromes (41). BCC frequently has benign evaluation despite the high rate of local recurrence. About 80% of BCCs are located in the head or neck. Several lines of evidence suggest that the worldwide incidence of BCC is increasing (42). Metastatic BCC is extremely rare, with the incidence rates up to 0.5%. It is defined as a primary cutaneous BCC that spreads to distant sites as histologically similar metastatic deposits of BCC (43).

Patients with oral and maxillofacial tumors have a high risk of local recurrence, but the risk of distant recurrence is low (4). Recurrence was found in only 31 (3.1%) of all included patients, with no data on the region cancer recurrence. For instance, Montero and Patel (4) report that the possibility of a second head and neck cancer is only 4%-7% per year because comprehensive clinical examinations and already a high suspicion in such cancer patients are the main reasons for early diagnosis and early detection.

The main strength of this study was its design. Although it was retrospective analysis of data, it was based on the method of population-based data, which were collected in a precise and rigorous manner from medical files in order to know all the characteristics of the cancer patients included in final analysis. Thus, despite some absent data from medical records, missing values were minor. The inclusion of patients from the cancer archive allowed us to overcome recruitment bias and gave us information on the totality of cancer cases in the given geographic area of Kosovo. The main limit of our study was the limited study area, since data were only obtained from one archive instead of multiple centres, and consequently a relatively small number of patients were included in the 3-year analysis. However, this study required an extended, standardized, dedicated registration, since in Kosovo we do not run cancer registries for collection and management of data from patients with oral, neck or head cancers. So, this was the first study of this kind conducted in Kosovo. Another limitation was design of the study, which did not assess all patient data and information. Time elapsed between diagnosis and treatment (time-to-treat) was investigated and showed considerable delay. It was generally long (median approximately 9 months, mean 22 months), however, we often could not identify the reason for this. Despite recommendations for early detection, cancers are still diagnosed rather late in Kosovo.

Conclusions

Oral cancers significantly contribute to patient mortality and morbidity, especially when detected late in the course of disease. This study highlighted data on gender distribution of cancer and provided information on anatomic locations where oral cancers were frequently detected. Considering prevalence data, clinicians should pay attention to the cheek region, mucosa and lip for early detection of cancers, since these regions were most common in our study. This study also showed differences between age groups, where elderly had a much higher probability of oral cancers compared to younger patients.

References

  • 1.Warnakulasuriya S. Causes of oral cancer – an appraisal of controversies. Br Dent J. 2009;207(10):471–5. 10.1038/sj.bdj.2009.1009 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Dhanuthai K, Rojanawatsirivej S, Thosaporn W, et al. Oral cancer: a multicenter study. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2018;23(1):e23–9. 10.4317/medoral.21999 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Tandon P, Dadhich A, Saluja H, Bawane S, Sachdeva S. The prevalence of squamous cell carcinoma in different sites of oral cavity at our Rural Health Care Centre in Loni, Maharashtra – a retrospective 10-year study. Contemp Oncol (Pozn). 2017;21(2):178–83. 10.5114/wo.2017.68628 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Montero PH, Patel SG. Cancer of the oral cavity. Surg Oncol Clin N Am. 2015;24(3):491–508. 10.1016/j.soc.2015.03.006 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Dumache R. Early diagnosis of oral squamous cell carcinoma by salivary microRNAs. Clin Lab. 2017;63(11):1771–6. 10.7754/Clin.Lab.2017.170607 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Petersen PE. Oral cancer prevention and control. The approach of the World Health Organisation. Oral Oncol. 2009;45(4-5):454–60. 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2008.05.023 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Ferlay J, Steliarova-Foucher E, Lortet-Tieulent J, et al. Cancer incidence and mortality patterns in Europe: estimates for 40 countries in 2012. Eur J Cancer. 2013;49(6):1374–403. 10.1016/j.ejca.2012.12.027 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Ligier K, Belot A, Launoy G, et al. Descriptive epidemiology of upper aerodigestive tract cancers in France: incidence over 1980-2005 and projection to 2010. Oral Oncol. 2011;47(4):302–7. 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2011.02.013 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Ligier K, Plouvier S, Danzon A, et al. Elements of completeness and results of the first year of registration of the “Registre général des cancers de Lille et de sa région”. Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique. 2012;60(2):131–9. 10.1016/j.respe.2011.10.006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Righini CA, Karkas A, Morel N, et al. Risk factors for cancers of the oral cavity, pharynx (cavity excluded) and larynx. Presse Med. 2008;37(9):1229–40. 10.1016/j.lpm.2008.03.010 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Ghantous Y, Yaffi V, Abu-Elnaaj I. Oral cavity cancer: epidemiology and early diagnosis. Refuat Hapeh Vehashinayim (1993). 2015;32(3):55-63. [PubMed]
  • 12.Mehanna H, Paleri V, West CM, Nutting C. Head and neck cancer – Part 1: Epidemiology, presentation, and preservation. Clin Otolaryngol. 2011;36(1):65–8. 10.1111/j.1749-4486.2010.02231.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Perry BJ, Zammit AP, Lewandowski AW, et al. Sites of origin of oral cavity cancer in nonsmokers vs smokers: possible evidence of dental trauma carcinogenesis and its importance compared with human papillomavirus. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2015;141(1):5–11. 10.1001/jamaoto.2014.2620 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Pelucchi C, Gallus S, Garavello W, Bosetti C, La Vecchia C. Cancer risk associated with alcohol and tobacco use: focus on upper aero-digestive tract and liver. Alcohol Res Health. 2006;29(3):193–8. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Marttila E, Uittamo J, Rusanen P, Lindqvist C, Salaspuro M, Rautemaa R. Acetaldehyde production and microbial colonization in oral squamous cell carcinoma and oral lichenoid disease. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2013;116(1):61–8. 10.1016/j.oooo.2013.02.009 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Feller L, Chandran R, Khammissa RA, Meyerov R, Lemmer J. Alcohol and oral squamous cell carcinoma. SADJ. 2013;68(4):176–80. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Anis R, Gaballah K. Oral cancer in the UAE: a multicenter, retrospective study. Libyan J Med. 2013;8(1):21782. 10.3402/ljm.v8i0.21782 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Dhanuthai K, Rojanawatsirivej S, Subarnbhesaj A, Thosaporn W, Kintarak S. A multicenter study of oral malignant tumors from Thailand. J Oral Maxillofac Pathol. 2016;20(3):462–6. 10.4103/0973-029X.190949 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Sargeran K, Murtomaa H, Safavi SM, Vehkalahti M, Teronen O. Malignant oral tumors in Iran: ten-year analysis on patient and tumor characteristics of 1042 patients in Tehran. J Craniofac Surg. 2006;17(6):1230–3. 10.1097/01.scs.0000246728.23483.ce [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Khan AR, Anwar N, Manan AH, Narayan KA. Case series analysis of oral cancer and their risk factors. Malays Dent J. 2008;29:46–50. [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Rawashdeh MA, Matalka I. Malignant oral tumors in Jordanians, 1991-2001. A descriptive epidemiological study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2004;33(2):183–8. 10.1054/ijom.2003.0494 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Ariyoshi Y, Shimahara M, Omura K, et al. Epidemiological study of malignant tumors in the oral and maxillofacial region: survey of member institutions of the Japanese Society of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons, 2002. Int J Clin Oncol. 2008;13(3):220–8. 10.1007/s10147-007-0756-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Ajayi OF, Adeyemo WL, Ladeinde AL, et al. Primary malignant neoplasms of orofacial origin: a retrospective review of 256 cases in a Nigerian tertiary hospital. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2007;36(5):403–8. 10.1016/j.ijom.2007.01.007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Singh MP, Kumar V, Agarwal A, Kumar R, Bhatt MLB, Misra S. Clinico-epidemiological study of oral squamous cell carcinoma: a tertiary care centre study in North India. J Oral Biol Craniofac Res. 2016;6(1):31–4. 10.1016/j.jobcr.2015.11.002 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Shenoi R, Devrukhkar V. Chaudhuri, Sharma B K, Sapre S B, Chikhale A. Demographic and clinical profile of oral squamous cell carcinoma patients: a retrospective study. Indian J Cancer. 2012;49(1):21–6. 10.4103/0019-509X.98910 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.BenNasir E, El Mistiri M, McGowan R, Katz RV. Oral cancer in Libya and development of regional oral cancer registries: a review. Saudi Dent J. 2015;27(4):171–9. 10.1016/j.sdentj.2015.05.002 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Subhashraj K, Orafi M, Nair KV, El-Gehani R, Elarbi M. Primary malignant tumors of orofacial region at Benghazi, Libya: a 17 years review. Cancer Epidemiol. 2009;33(5):332–6. 10.1016/j.canep.2009.10.009 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Brandizzi D, Gandolfo M, Velazco ML, Cabrini RL, Lanfranchi HE. Clinical features and evolution of oral cancer: a study of 274 cases in Buenos Aires, Argentina. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2008;13(9):E544–8. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Bhattacharjee A, Chakraborty A, Purkaystha P. Prevalence of head and neck cancers in the north east – an institutional study. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2006;58(1):15–9. 10.1007/BF02907731 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Maleki D, Ghojazadeh M, Mahmoudi SS, et al. Epidemiology of oral cancer in Iran: a systematic review. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2015;16(13):5427–32. 10.7314/APJCP.2015.16.13.5427 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Johnson NW. Orofacial neoplasms: global epidemiology, risk factors and recommendations for research. Int Dent J. 1991;41(6):365–75. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Chidzonga MM. Oral malignant neoplasia: a survey of 428 cases in two Zimbabwean hospitals. Oral Oncol. 2006;42(2):177–83. 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2005.07.003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Howell RE, Wright BA, Dewar R. Trends in the incidence of oral cancer in Nova Scotia from 1983 to 1997. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2003;95(2):205–12. 10.1067/moe.2003.49 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Ali J, Sabiha B, Jan HU, Haider SA, Khan AA, Ali SS. Genetic etiology of oral cancer. Oral Oncol. 2017;70:23–8. 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2017.05.004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Hussein AA, Helder MN, de Visscher JG, et al. Global incidence of oral and oropharynx cancer in patients younger than 45 years versus older patients: a systematic review. Eur J Cancer. 2017;82:115–27. 10.1016/j.ejca.2017.05.026 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Di Lernia V, Ricci C, Zalaudek I, Argenziano G. Metastasizing basal cell carcinoma. Cutis. 2013;92(5):244–6. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Lear JT, Dziewulski P, Ross GL, et al. Challenges and new horizons in the management of advanced basal cell carcinoma: a UK perspective. Br J Cancer. 2014;111(8):1476–81. 10.1038/bjc.2014.270 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Berking C, Hauschild A, Kölbl O, et al. Basal cell carcinoma – treatments for the commonest skin cancer. Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2014;111(22):389–95. 10.3238/arztebl.2014.0389 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Lomas A, Leonardi-Bee J, Bath-Hextall F. A systematic review of worldwide incidence of nonmelanoma skin cancer. Br J Dermatol. 2012;166(5):1069–80. 10.1111/j.1365-2133.2012.10830.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Samarasinghe V, Madan V. Nonmelanoma skin cancer. J Cutan Aesthet Surg. 2012;5(1):3–10. 10.4103/0974-2077.94323 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Weiss GJ, Korm RL. Metastatic basal cell carcinoma in the era of hedgehog signalling pathway inhibitors. Cancer. 2012;118(21):5310–9. 10.1002/cncr.27532 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Mohan SV, Chang AL. Advanced basal cell carcinoma and therapeutic innovations. Curr Dermatol Rep. 2014;3:40–5. 10.1007/s13671-014-0069-y [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Moser S, Borm J, Mihic-Probost D, Jacobsen C, Kruse Gujer AL. Metastatic basal cell carcinoma: report of a case and review of the literature. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2014;117(2):e79–82. 10.1016/j.oooo.2012.04.030 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Acta Clinica Croatica are provided here courtesy of Sestre Milosrdnice University Hospital Center

RESOURCES