Skip to main content
Iranian Journal of Public Health logoLink to Iranian Journal of Public Health
. 2021 Jan;50(1):146–151. doi: 10.18502/ijph.v50i1.5081

Comparison of the Prevalence of Microbial Surface Components Recognizing Adhesive Matrix Molecules (MSCRAMMs) among Staphylococcus aureus Isolates in a Burn Unit with Non-Burning Units

Hossein SEDAGHAT 1, Tahmineh NARIMANI 2, Bahram NASR ESFAHANI 2, Sina MOBASHERIZADEH 3, Seyed Asghar HAVAEI 4,5,*
PMCID: PMC8213615  PMID: 34178773

Abstract

Background:

Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus) is one of the most important pathogens in burn infections colonized in the nose and increase the risk of infections.

Methods:

Overall, 85 S. aureus isolates were isolated from clinical and nasal hospitalized patients and health care workers (HCWs) in a burn unit and non-burn units in Isfahan from June 2016 and September 2016. Genes encoding penicillin-binding protein 2a (mecA) and adhesive surface proteins, including fibronectin-binding proteins (fnbA,fnbB), fibrinogen binding protein (fib), laminin-binding protein(eno), collagen binding protein (cna), elastin binding protein (ebps), intracellular adhesion operon (icaA and icaD) were detected using PCR method.

Results:

The rate of methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) among burn and non-burn isolates were 62% (18/29) and 25% (14/56), respectively. The most prevalent MSCRAMMs genes in burn units were eno (86%) and fib (66%). The most common gene pattern in burn center was icaA+fib+eno. The frequency of icaD, fib and ebpS was higher in clinical samples than nasal samples. No relation was found between the MSCRAMMs genes in the burn unit and non-burn units.

Conclusion:

The high prevalence of MRSA in burn center can be a new challenge for clinicians. The higher frequency of icaD, fib and ebpS in clinical isolates than nasal isolates may reflect the important role of these genes in colonization and pathogenesis of S. aureus.

Keywords: Staphylococcus aureus, Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), Surface proteins, Proteins

Introduction

Staphylococcus aureus is an important pathogen with a variety of virulence factors that can cause life-threatening infections (1, 2). The bacteria is one of the most common causes of burn wound infections (3). The colonization of microorganisms in burn wounds may be the result of patient’s endogenous flora or contact with contaminated environmental surfaces, the hands of healthcare workers (HCWs) and the air (46).

Nasal carriage of S. aureus plays a critical role in the development of S. aureus infection (7, 8). Bio-film production of S. aureus plays an important role in adherence and colonization of microorganisms on mammary epithelium cells and resistance to antibiotics or evasion from host immunological response. The intracellular adhesion (ica) operon is necessary for the control of bio-film production. Among ica locus, the icaA and icaD genes are more important than other genes (9, 10).

The other virulence factors involved in adherence to the host tissue are microbial surface component recognizing adhesive matrix molecules (MSCRAMMs) which contains molecules called collagen-binding protein (Cna), elastin binding protein (EbpS), fibronectin-binding proteins (FnbA and FnbB), laminin-binding protein (Eno) and fibrinogen binding protein (Fib). Unfortunately, the emergence of multi-drug resistant strains has become a major public health concern worldwide (11). mecA acquisition converts methicillin-susceptible S. aureus (MSSA) strains into methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) that are resistant to different antibiotics (1214).

We aimed to compare the frequency of genes encoding the MSCRAMMs among isolates of S. aureus from clinical and nasal samples in a burn unit with non-burning units at Isfahan, center of Iran.

Methods

Overall, 85 non-duplicate S. aureus isolates were collected from clinical samples and nasal swabs of hospitalized patients and HCWs in three hospitals, including a burn unit and two non-burn units in Isfahan, Iran from Jun 2016 and Sep 2016. Samples were obtained from Surgery, Intensive Care Units (ICUs), and Internal Medicine Wards.

The screening procedure for S. aureus nasal carriage was carried out by rotating a sterile swab soaked with saline in the anterior 1.5 cm of the nasal vestibule of both of the personnel and patient’s nares and inoculating into mannitol salt agar medium. Moreover, clinical samples were collected from hospitalized patients. Both clinical and nasal samples were transported to the laboratory of medical microbiology for identification. After incubation at 35 °C for 48 h, identification was performed based on colony morphology, Gram stain, catalase test, coagulase test, mannitol fermentation and DNase test (15). DNA templates for the PCR assay were extracted by the method (12). The presence mecA and MSCRAMMs genes were detected using specific primers as exhibited in Table 1. The PCR was performed in a 25 μl reaction mixture containing 1μl of each primer (10 pmol), 1X PCR buffer, MgCl2, 0.2 mM dNTP Mix, 5 μl of template DNA and 1.5U of Taq DNA polymerase. The Modified PCR conditions for MSCRAMMs and ica genes (fnbA,fnbB,fib,eno,cna,ebps, icaA and icaD) were as follows: 25 cycles of denaturation at 94 °C for 1 min, annealing at 55 ° for 1 min and extension at 72 °C for 1 min (16, 17). Besides, PCR was performed for detection of mecA with the following amplification cycles: 30 cycles of denaturation (94 °C, 2 min), annealing (57 °C, 1 min) and extension (72 °C, 2 min).

Table 1:

Primers and product size for MSCRAMMs and biofilm genes

Gene Primer sequence (5′- 3′) Product size(bp) Reference
cna F: GTCAAGCAGTTATTAACACCAGAC 423 16–17
R: AATCAGTAATTGCACTTTGTCCACTG
eno F: ACGTGCAGCAGCTGACT 302 16–17
R: CAACAGCATCTTCAGTACCTTC
fib F: CTACAACTACAATTGCGTCAACAG 404 16–17
R: GCTCTTGTAAGACCATTTTCTTCAC
fnbA F: GTGAAGTTTTAGAAGGTGGAAAGATTAG 643 16–17
R: GCTCTTGTAAGACCATTTTTCTTCAC
fnbB F: GTAACAGCTAATGGTCGAATTGATACT 524 16–17
R: CAAGTTCGATAGGAGTACTATGTTC
ebpS F: CATCCAGAACCAATCGAAGAC 185 16–17
R: AGTTACATCATCATGTTTATCTTTTG
icaA F: TGG CTG TAT TAA GCG AAG TC 669 16–17
R: CCT CTG TCT GGG CTT GAC C
icaD F: ATGGTCAAGCCCAGACAGAG 198 16–17
R: AGTATTTTCAATGTTTAAAGCAA

Statistical analysis

The analysis was performed using SPSSTM software, version 21.0 (IBM Corp., USA). The results are presented as descriptive statistics in terms of relative frequency. Chi-square test was used to determine the significance of differences. A difference was considered statistically significant if the p-value was less than 0.05.

Ethical approval

This study was in accordance with the declaration of Helsinki and informed written consent was obtained from hospitalized patients and HCWs. The study protocol was approved by the Ethics Committee of Isfahan University of Medical Sciences (IR.MUI.REC.1394.3.951).

Results

Of 85 S. aureus isolates 26 (31%) and 59 (69%) were clinical isolates and nasal isolates, respectively. Among 85 S. aureus isolates 32 (37.6%) isolates were MRSA and 53 (62.4%) were MSSA. Of 29 burn S. aureus isolates, 18 (62%) were MRSA while, of 56 non-burn S. aureus isolates, 14 (25%) were MRSA. The prevalence of MRSA was significantly higher in burn center than non-burn centers (P=0.0018).

In this study, the prevalence of icaA, icaD, cna, eno, ebpS, fib, fnbB and fnbA in MRSA isolates was as 46.8%, 46.8%, 25%, 84.3, 9.3%, 50%, 3.1% and 9.3%, respectively. In addition, the frequency of icaA, icaD, cna, eno, ebpS, fib, fnbB and fnbA in MSSA isolates was 49%, 33.9%, 35.8%, 62.2%, 43.3%, 58.4%, 9.4% and 3.7%, respectively. The prevalence of ebpS gene was significantly higher in MSSA than MRSA (P=0.0013). Comparison of the prevalence of virulence factors between clinical and nasal samples showed that the frequency of icaD (P=0.0176), fib (P=0.0095) and ebpS (P=0.0200) was significantly higher in clinical samples than nasal samples (Table 2). Furthermore, there was no significant difference between the frequency of MSCRAMMs genes in burn isolates and non-burn isolates. The comparison of prevalence of MSCRAMMs and ica genes in burn center with non-burn centers are shown in Table 2.

Table 2:

The frequency of MSCRAMMs and biofilm genes among MRSA and MSSA isolates from burn unit and non-burn units in Isfahan, Iran

Genotype non-burn units n(%)=56 burn unit n(%)=29 P-value Nasal isolates n(%)=59 Clinical isolates n(%)=26 P-value Total n(%)=85
icaD 29(52) 12(41) 0.4926 23(39) 18(69) 0.0176 41(48)
ica A 20(36) 13(45) 0.4842 20(34) 13(50) 0.2271 33(39)
cna 19(34) 8(28) 0.6285 17(29) 10(38) 0.4508 27(32)
eno 39(70) 25(86) 0.1160 44(75) 20(77) 1.0000 64(75)
ebpS 21(37) 5(17) 0.0815 12(20) 14(54) 0.0042 26(31)
Fib 28(50) 19(66) 0.2499 27(46) 20(77) 0.0095 47(55)
fnbA 4(7) 1(3) 0.6569 3(5) 2(8) 0.6392 5(6)
fnbB 5(9) 1(3) 0.6590 5(8) 1(4) 0.4462 6(7)

In this survey, high diversity in the coexistence of MSCRAMMs and ica genes was observed. The most prevalent coexistence profile was icaA+icaD+fib+ebpS+cna+eno, found in 8.2% (7/85) followed by icaA+fib+eno and icaD+fib+eno found in 7% (6/85) and 5.8% (5/85) of the isolates, respectively. The rate of other common pattern gene are icaD+ebpS+eno (4.7%), fib+eno (4.7%), icaA+icaD+fib+eno (3.5%) and icaD+cna (3.5%).

Discussion

In this study, the rate of MRSA in burn center was 62%, which is similar to reports conducted by Motallebi et al. (60.1%) (17) and Moghadam et al.(61.54%) (18) in Tehran but is higher than other reports in Iran (19, 20). Our results showed a significant difference in MRSA rate in burn center than non-burn centers in Isfahan. The higher prevalence of MRSA in burn centers than non-burn centers may indicate a potential outbreak of MRSA in the burn centers, which leads to treatment failure. According to our results, improvement of infection control programs and treatment guidelines in burn centers is recommended (21). A wide range of S. aureus strains carries the ica genes which leads to the production of biofilms in some of them. Therefore, the loss of ica cluster results in the reduction of strain capacity in biofilm formation (22). In this study, the presence of icaA and icaD was detected in 39% and 48% of S. aureus isolates, respectively.

Various studies have shown a different rate of these genes which may indicate the difference in the source of strains in different geographical regions (17). A notable finding of the present study was a significantly higher percentage of the icaD gene in clinical isolates (69.2%) than nasal isolates (38.9%). Although the icaD gene is present in the nasal isolates, it may play a more important role in the development of the infection than icaA gene.

Cna adhesion is a virulence determinant which plays a role in the pathogenesis of septic arthritis, bone infection, endocarditis or bacteremia with bone or joint infection (23). In the present study, the rate of cna gene was 32% that is lower than the prevalence of other studies in the United Kingdom (52%), North America (43%), Sweden (57%), Turkey(78.4%) and higher than one study in Iran (17, 2426).

fnbA and fnbB are two adhesion factor genes that contribute to the invasion of bacteria (27). In the present study, the prevalence rate of fnbA was low (6%). In contrast, all S. aureus strains isolated from patients with Urinary Tract Infections (UTIs) were positive for fnbA (28). Interestingly, other studies in Iran and other countries reported a higher rate of this gene (9, 23, 27, 29). We observed that the frequency of the fnbB gene is also low (7%). fnbB was associated more with endocarditis than with osteomyelitis/arthritis (30). Another notable result in our study was higher prevalence ebpS (43.3%) in MSSA than MRSA (9.3%). These results are consistent with other studies that reported low prevalence ebpS in MRSA (17, 27, 29) and a high prevalence of this gene in MSSA isolates (31). The high frequency of ebpS in MSSA is an advantage for colonization and expansion of virulent clones. Furthermore, our study indicated that the higher proportion of ebpS and fib in clinical samples than nasal samples was statistically significant. Therefore, the strains carrying ebpS, fib and icaD genes have higher virulence potential and are more pathogenic than other strains.

In this survey, there was no significant difference between the frequency of MSCRAMMs genes in burn isolates and non-burn isolates but there were different coexistence patterns in the burn unit and non-burn units. icaA+icaD+fib+ebpS+cna+eno pattern was the most coexistence profile. Among 7 isolates with this profile, 6 isolates were collected from non-burn centers and one isolate from burn center. The most common profiles in burn center were icaA+fib+eno (5 isolates), icaD+fib+eno (3 isolates) and fib+eno (3 isolates). The high prevalence of eno (75%) in S. aureus isolates and the presence of eno and fib in the majority of coexistence profiles may reflect the critical role of these genes during colonization of S. aureus, especially at the burn unit.

Conclusion

There was no significant difference in the prevalence of ica and MSCRAMMs in burn center with non-burn centers. However, the significantly higher frequency of icaD, fib, and ebpS in clinical isolates than nasal isolates may reflect the important role of these genes in colonization and pathogenesis of S. aureus. This encourages the development of new strategies to prevent colonization of S. aureus. The high prevalence of MRSA in burn unit indicates the need to improve the control programs and treatment guidelines in burn units. Improvement of infection control programs and treatment guidelines in burn centers is recommended.

Ethical considerations

Ethical issues (Including plagiarism, informed consent, misconduct, data fabrication and/or falsification, double publication and/or submission, redundancy, etc.) have been completely observed by the authors.

Acknowledgements

This study was an original research paper from Ph.D. thesis. This study was funded in part by grant from the “Nosocomial Infection Research Center, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran (grant no 294169)”.

Footnotes

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests.

References

  • 1.Deurenberg RH, Beisser PS, Visschers MJ, et al. (2010). Molecular typing of methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus isolates collected in the Yogyakarta area in Indonesia, 2006. Clin Microbiol Infect, 16 (1):92–4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Yu Y, Yao Y, Weng Q, et al. (2017). Dissemination and Molecular Characterization of Staphylococcus aureus at a Tertiary Referral Hospital in Xiamen City, China. Biomed Res Int, 2017:1367179. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Kooistra-Smid M, Nieuwenhuis M, van Belkum A, et al. (2009). The role of nasal carriage in Staphylococcus aureus burn wound colonization. FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol, 57 (1):1–13. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Wysocki AB. (2002). Evaluating and managing open skin wounds: colonization versus infection. AACN Clin Issues, 13 (3):382–97. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.McKenna E, Clement K, Thompson E, et al. (2011). Using a nursing productivity committee to achieve cost savings and improve staffing levels and staff satisfaction. Crit Care Nurse, 31 (6):55–65. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Erol S, Altoparlak U, Akcay MN, et al. (2004). Changes of microbial flora and wound colonization in burned patients. Burns, 30(4):357–61. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Karimi M, Esfahani BN, Halaji M, et al. (2017). Molecular characteristics and antibiotic resistance pattern of Staphylococcus aureus nasal carriage in tertiary care hospitals of Isfahan, Iran. Infez Med, 25 (3):234–240. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Moshtagheian S, Halaji M, Sedaghat H, et al. (2018). Molecular characteristics of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus nasal carriage from hospitalized patients and medical staff in Isfahan, Iran. Ann Ig, 30(3):237–44. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Khoramrooz SS, Mansouri F, Marashifard M, et al. (2016). Detection of biofilm related genes, classical enterotoxin genes and agr typing among Staphylococcus aureus isolated from bovine with subclinical mastitis in southwest of Iran. Microb Pathog, 97:45–51. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Hoveida L, Halaji M, Rostami S, et al. (2019). Biofilm-producing ability of Staphylococcus spp isolated from different foodstuff products. Ann Ig, 31 (2):140–147. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Havaei SA, Vidovic S, Tahmineh N, et al. (2011). Epidemic methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus lineages are the main cause of infections at an Iranian university hospital. J Clin Microbiol, 49 (11):3990–3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Ito T, Kuwahara-Arai K, Katayama Y, et al. (2014). Staphylococcal Cassette Chromosome mec (SCCmec) analysis of MRSA. Methods Mol Biol, 1085:131–48.24085694 [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Sedaghat H, Esfahani BN, Mobasherizadeh S, et al. (2017). Phenotypic and genotypic characterization of macrolide resistance among Staphylococcus aureus isolates in Isfahan, Iran. Iran J Microbiol, 9 (5):264–70. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Halaji M, Karimi A, Shoaei P, et al. (2017). Distribution of SCCmec Elements and Presence of Panton-Valentine Leukocidin in Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcusepidermidis Isolated from Clinical Samples in a University Hospital of Isfahan City, Iran. J Clin Diagn Res, 11(7):DC27–DC31. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Mahon CR LD, Manuselis G. Textbook of Diagnostic Microbiology-E-Book. Elsevier Health Sciences; 2014. March 25. [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Vancraeynest D, Hermans K, Haesebrouck F. (2004). Genotypic and phenotypic screening of high and low virulence Staphylococcus aureus isolates from rabbits for biofilm formation and MSCRAMMs. Vet Microbiol, 103 (3–4):241–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Motallebi M, Jabalameli F, Asadollahi K, et al. (2016). Spreading of genes encoding enterotoxins, haemolysins, adhesin and biofilm among methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus strains with staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec type IIIA isolated from burn patients. Microb Pathog, 97:34–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Ohadian Moghadam S, Pourmand MR, Aminharati F. (2014). Biofilm formation and antimicrobial resistance in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolated from burn patients, Iran. J Infect Dev Ctries, 8 (12):1511–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Fatholahzadeh B, Emaneini M, Gilbert G, et al. (2008). Staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec (SCCmec) analysis and antimicrobial susceptibility patterns of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) isolates in Tehran, Iran. Microb Drug Resist, 14 (3):217–20. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Hoseini Alfatemi SM, Motamedifar M, Hadi N, et al. (2014). Analysis of Virulence Genes Among Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) Strains. Jundishapur J Microbiol, 7(6):e10741. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Shahini Shams-Abadi M, Halaji M, Hoseini-Alfatemi SM, et al. (2018). Epidemiology of toxic shock syndrome toxin-1 harboring Staphylococcus aureus obtained from clinical samples in Iran: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Ann Ig, 30 (5):391–400. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Martin-Lopez JV, Perez-Roth E, Claverie-Martin F, et al. (2002). Detection of Staphylococcus aureus Clinical Isolates Harboring the ica Gene Cluster Needed for Biofilm Establishment. J Clin Microbiol, 40 (4):1569–70. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Arciola CR, Campoccia D, Gamberini S, et al. (2005). Prevalence of cna, fnbA and fnbB adhesin genes among Staphylococcus aureus isolates from orthopedic infections associated to different types of implant. FEMS Microbiol Lett, 246 (1):81–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Rhem MN, Lech EM, Patti JM, et al. (2000). The collagen-binding adhesin is a virulence factor in Staphylococcus aureus keratitis. Infect Immun, 68 (6):3776–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Jett BD, Gilmore MS. (2002). Host-parasite interactions in Staphylococcus aureus keratitis. DNA Cell Biol, 21 (5–6):397–404. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Duran N, Dogramaci Y, Demir C, et al. (2010). Detection of slime and methicillin resistance genes in Staphylococci isolated from nasal samples of patients with orthopaedic implants. Med Sci Monit, 16 (8):BR271–7. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Serray B, Oufrid S, Hannaoui I, et al. (2016). Genes encoding adhesion factors and biofilm formation in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in Morocco. J Infect Dev Ctries, 10(8):863–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Yousefi M, Pourmand MR, Fallah F, et al. (2016). Characterization of Staphylococcus aureus Biofilm Formation in Urinary Tract Infection. Iran J Public Health, 45 (4):485–93. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Ghasemian A, Najar Peerayeh S, Bakhshi B, et al. (2015). The Microbial Surface Components Recognizing Adhesive Matrix Molecules (MSCRAMMs) Genes among Clinical Isolates of Staphylococcus aureus from Hospitalized Children. Iran J Pathol, 10(4):258–64. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Tristan A, Ying L, Bes M, et al. (2003). Use of multiplex PCR to identify Staphylococcus aureus adhesins involved in human hematogenous infections. J Clin Microbiol, 41 (9):4465–4467. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Rasmussen G, Monecke S, Ehricht R, et al. (2013). Prevalence of clonal complexes and virulence genes among commensal and invasive Staphylococcus aureus isolates in Sweden. PLoS One, 8 (10):e77477. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Iranian Journal of Public Health are provided here courtesy of Tehran University of Medical Sciences

RESOURCES