Skip to main content
Scientific Reports logoLink to Scientific Reports
. 2021 Jun 18;11:12838. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-91929-2

Exploring physicochemical and cytogenomic diversity of African cowpea and common bean

Sílvia Catarino 1,2,#, Miguel Brilhante 1,3,#, Anyse Pereira Essoh 1,4,5, Alberto B Charrua 1,5,6, Josefa Rangel 1,7, Guilherme Roxo 1, Eromise Varela 1, Margarida Moldão 1, Ana Ribeiro-Barros 2, Salomão Bandeira 8, Mónica Moura 4, Pedro Talhinhas 1, Maria M Romeiras 1,3,
PMCID: PMC8213759  PMID: 34145302

Abstract

In sub-Saharan Africa, grain legumes (pulses) are essential food sources and play an important role in sustainable agriculture. Among the major pulse crops, the native cowpea (Vigna unguiculata) and introduced common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) stand out. This paper has two main goals. First, we provide a comprehensive view of the available genetic resources of these genera in Africa, including data on germplasm collections and mapping biodiversity-rich areas. Second, we investigate patterns of physicochemical and cytogenomic variation across Africa to explore the geographical structuring of variation between native and introduced beans. Our results revealed that 73 Vigna and 5 Phaseolus species occur in tropical regions of Africa, with 8 countries accounting for more than 20 native species. Conversely, germplasm collections are poorly represented when compared to the worldwide collections. Regarding the nuclear DNA content, on average, V. unguiculata presents significantly higher values than P. vulgaris. Also, V. unguiculata is enriched in B, Mg, S, and Zn, while P. vulgaris has more Fe, Ca, and Cu. Overall, our study suggests that the physicochemical and cytogenomic diversity of native Vigna species is higher than previously thought, representing valuable food resources to reduce food insecurity and hunger, particularly of people living in African developing countries.

Subject terms: Biochemistry, Ecology, Molecular biology, Plant sciences

Introduction

Leguminosae (nom. alt. Fabaceae family) is characterized by approximately 770 genera and 19,500 species, being largely cultivated worldwide1,2. The crops within this family provide an important resource throughout the tropical and temperate world, ranking third among the most economically significant plant families3. In sub-Saharan Africa, grain legumes (pulses) are widely cultivated for human consumption due to their considerable content of protein and are occasionally sold for cash income4. In addition, dry beans are important sources of energy (starch), dietary fiber and minerals. Moreover, through the consociation of cultures they are used as a cheaper means to enrich the soil with nitrogen (N), one of the main limiting factors in crop production worldwide, particularly in this region as a result of the intensive cultivation observed over the past two centuries5,6.

The most widely consumed legume crops in this sub-region are Arachis hypogaea L. (groundnut), Cajanus cajan (L.) Huth (pigeon pea), Cicer arietinum L. (chickpea), Phaseolus vulgaris L. (common bean), and Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp. (cowpea)7. The common bean and cowpea are the most cultivated pulses, constituting important staples and food security resources due to their potential to alleviate malnutrition8.

The genus Phaseolus, originates from the tropics and subtropics of the New World, and includes 89 accepted species9. In many Latin American and African countries, common bean (P. vulgaris) is the most economically important source of protein10. It has its center of origin in the Mesoamerican region11 and was probably first introduced in eastern Africa by the Portuguese in the sixteenth century12. Furthermore, Arab slave traders and Swahili merchants carried the common bean inland, which became established as food crop in Africa before the colonial era13.

On the other hand, the highest diversity of the genus Vigna is found in sub-Saharan Africa, namely in Namibia, Angola, Botswana, Zambia, Zimbabwe, Mozambique, and the Republic of South Africa1416. This genus has 105 accepted species9 distributed across tropical regions and includes important legume crops such as V. radiata (mung bean) and V. unguiculata (cowpea), as well as several neglected and underutilized crops such as V. aconitifolia (moth bean) and V. subterranea (bambara groundnut)17. Hypothetically, Africa is regarded as the center of origin of cultivated cowpea during the Neolithic times, where wild and cultivated relatives can be found displaying a large diversity of forms and remaining the dominant African grain legume18. Altogether, its remarkable ability to tolerate abiotic stresses (i.e. drought and high temperatures)14,19 and the significant amount of dietary protein (18–35%), vitamins, and minerals it contains, make this kind of beans extremely important both economically and socially across sub-Saharan Africa, which suffers from a chronic protein shortage20,21.

Cowpea is usually considered the “poor man’s meat”22, as it provides high nutritional value food both for humans and the cattle, and ca. 80% of production occurs in the drier savanna and Sahelian zones of Africa23,24. On the other hand, productivity of common bean is extremely low in sub-Saharan Africa, partly due to drought stress, and low levels of phosphorous (P) available in the soil25. Soils with low levels of P seems to be related to plants of small genome sizes and therefore, cytogenomic data can be a predictor of soil types or even of farming practices26.

Beyond the molecular markers, the use of nuclear DNA content to study the intraspecific genetic diversity and also molecular, cellular, and evolutionary genomic mechanisms has recently been increasing27. In this sense, data regarding genome size is of extreme importance for different scientific fields such as systematics and ecology28. Estimation of nuclear DNA content is nowadays simple and efficient though the widely used technique, flow cytometry29. This technique has been successfully applied to estimate the nuclear DNA size of several plant species such as P. vulgaris and V. unguiculata (e.g., Parida et al.30, Nagl and Treviranus31; Barow and Meister32; Lonardi et al.33), however, cytogenomic studies targeting intraspecific variability in both species are scarce.

This paper has two main goals. First, we provide a comprehensive view of the available genetic resources of the genera Vigna and Phaseolus in Africa, including data on germplasm collections (ex situ conservation) and mapping biodiversity-rich areas (in situ conservation), to identify the main diversity hotspots in Africa. Second, we investigate patterns of physicochemical (e.g. seed phenotypic traits and mineral content) and cytogenomic variation across Africa to explore the geographical structuring of variation between native cowpea (V. unguiculata) and introduced bean species (P. vulgaris). Therefore, samples collected across different African countries (i.e.: Western: Angola and Eastern Africa: Mozambique, and also in the dry islands, located in the Atlantic Ocean ca. 570 km off the western coast of Africa, near Senegal) were analyzed to: (i) characterize seed phenotypic traits (i.e. quantitative: length, width, and height; and qualitative: shape, color and hilum); (ii) determine the profiles of 11 minerals in seeds of these species, and identify homogeneous groups based on their mineral content; and (iii) assess the nuclear DNA content of ecotypes of both species based on flow cytometry and compare the genome size between species and collection sites. In addition, the current and potential contribution of these species as a high valuable food resource in the sub-Saharan Africa region is also discussed.

Results

Species diversity in Africa

Our study identified 73 Vigna species and 5 Phaseolus species occurring in Africa (Fig. 1a), representing 69.5% and 5.6% respectively of the total number of species currently accepted. The diversity of Vigna is much higher and most species are native to Africa (63 species) (Supplementary Table S1). Thirteen of them are endemic, occurring in only one country, for instance: V. angivensis, V. bosseri, V. keraudrenii, and V. microsperma occur in Madagascar; V. mendesii and V. ramanniana in Angola; and V. monantha and V. somaliensis in Somalia. Among native Vigna, six are cultivated by African populations (namely, V. subterranea, V. parkeri, V. unguiculata, V. marina, V. luteola and V. vexillata) mainly for human consumption, but also for animal fodder and medicinal uses. The introduced species of Vigna are native from Asia (seven species) and America (3 species), most of them (6 species) being cultivated.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

The genera Vigna and Phaseolus in Africa: (a) Number of species of Vigna and Phaseolus occurring globally (total number of accepted species), occurring in Africa and native to Africa; (b) Conservation status of Vigna and Phaseolus species native to Africa continent (IUCN conservation status: CR, Critically Endangered; EN, Endangered; VU, Vulnerable; NT, Near threatened; LC, Least concern; DD, Data deficient; NE, Not evaluated).

The genus Phaseolus has low species diversity in Africa, and four out of the five species identified originate from America. These species are extensively cultivated in Africa mainly for human and animal consumption. Only one species, P. massaiensis, is native to Africa (Supplementary Table S1) and is restricted to Tanzania.

Conservation status and germplasm collections

The information available at the IUCN Red List34 revealed that 61.9% of the native species were already evaluated according to the IUCN criteria and categories: one species, V. dolomitica, is classified as Critically Endangered, four species as Endangered, one species as Near Threatened, three species as Data Deficient, and 30 species as Least Concern. Twenty-four native species remain unevaluated, including P. massaiensis (Fig. 1b).

The analysis of the accessions available worldwide reveals that only 50 of the 78 studied species (64.1%) are preserved in gene banks (Supplementary Table S1). The species P. vulgaris, V. unguiculata and the introduced V. radiata have the highest number of worldwide accessions, ca. 136,000, 40,000 and 16,000 respectively. Six species (7.7%) have 10,000–1000 accessions, 10 species (12.8%) 1000–100; 15 species (19.2%) 100–10, and 16 species (20.5%) 10–1. The 28 species without accessions have, in general, restricted areas of distribution: 11 are endemic to a single country (i.e., Angola: V. mendesii and V. ramanniana; Madagascar: V. bosseri, V. keraudrenii and V. microsperma; Tanzania: P. massaiensis and V. jaegeri; Somalia: V. monantha and V. somaliensis; Central African Republic: V. tisserantiana; and V. mildbraedii is endemic to Central Rwanda).

To explore the Angola’s crop diversity conserved in gene banks, we consulted the available data in the Genesys database35, which contains 530 accessions of five species, with around 95% of them belonging to P. vulgaris (290) and V. unguiculta (217). However, most of them are stored at the SADC Plant Genetic Resources Centre in Zambia and none have been reported in Angolan gene banks or in other local Institutions. In Mozambique, 58 accessions were collected (i.e.: 46 of V. unguiculata, 8 of V. radiata and the remaining belong to three other species). Like Angola, Mozambique does not have accessions registered in national gene banks, and most are stored at the International Institute of Tropical Agriculture in Nigeria. Cabo Verde has only two accessions (P. lunatus and P. vulgaris) gathered in the country, but both are stored at the Portuguese Plant Germplasm Bank. More details are provided in Supplementary Table S1.

Biodiversity-rich areas in Africa

The highest number of Vigna species (native and introduced) were found in Central Africa, with a maximum of 26 species by cell (200 × 200 km) found in the Democratic Republic of Congo (Fig. 2a). Other areas in West and East Africa such as Togo, Benin, Nigeria, Cameroon, Tanzania, Malawi, and Zambia, are also very rich in Vigna species. The region of Southern Africa presents low values of richness, with a maximum of 9 species found in a cell. In Africa, the diversity of Phaseolus species reaches the maximum of 3 species per cell (Fig. 2b), which is found in Cameroon, Ethiopia, Eastern Democratic Republic of Congo, Rwanda, Burundi, Zambia and Malawi. The number of records recorded in Southern Africa, Namibia and Angola is very low for this genus. The Northern African region presents the lowest species richness for both genera.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Species richness by cell of 200 × 200 km including native and introduced species of (a) Vigna and (b) Phaseolus. This figure was produced with the free available on-line software QGIS v.3.4.4 (http://qgis.osgeo.org).

In terms of native species, four countries stand out for hosting a high number of Vigna species (Fig. 3): Democratic Republic of Congo with 32 species, Tanzania with 30 species, Zambia with 28 species, and Cameroon with 27 species. Burundi, Angola, Nigeria, and Malawi also boast a great diversity with more than 20 native Vigna species. These results represent the data available in herbariums and museums worldwide, which is affected by the collection effort in each region over time.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Species richness of native Vigna by country. This figure was produced with the free available on-line software QGIS v.3.4.4 (http://qgis.osgeo.org).

Physicochemical characterization of P. vulgaris and V. unguiculata

Physical characterization

Our results showed that the studied seeds of V. unguiculata and P. vulgaris presented a varied array of colors and seed shapes.

Vigna unguiculata samples are mostly globose (94%) and most of the samples (82%) presented brown seeds, the hilum was always white, while the color of the rim varied between black and brown, and rarely yellow (MP04Vu). Length values of V. unguiculata varied from 5.5 mm (UI31Vu) to 10.3 mm (CC27Vu), width values ranged from 4.7 mm (UI31Vu) to 8.2 mm (MP34Vu) and height values ranged between 3.2 mm (UI31Vu) and 5.9 mm (MP34Vu).

All samples of P. vulgaris had an oblong shape. Most of the samples presented brown color (ca. 76%), the hilum was always white and the color of the rim varied between black and brown, and rarely white (SO14Pv). The length of P. vulgaris varied from 10.1 mm (MA21Pv) to 17.0 mm (SO11Pv), width values ranged from 6.3 mm (MA43Pv) to 8.5 mm (SO09PV) and height values varied between 4.3 mm (CV38Pv) and 10.1 mm (MP02Pv). Overall, P. vulgaris presented higher length, width, and height values (13.5 ± 2.3, 7.1 ± 0.7, and 5.9 ± 3.4 mm, respectively) comparatively to V. unguiculata (8.0 ± 1.2, 6.5 ± 1.0, and 4.9 ± 0.8 mm, respectively) (Supplementary Table S3).

Mineral content

Mineral diversity was analyzed in 38 samples of P. vulgaris (n = 21) and V. unguiculata (n = 17) collected in Angola (20), Mozambique (13), and Cabo Verde (5) (Supplementary Table S4). Figure 4 and Supplementary Table S4 represent the average values (mg/kg ww) and homogeneous groups for the content of 11 minerals (Sodium [Na], Potassium [K], Calcium [Ca], Magnesium [Mg], Potassium [P], Sulfur [S], Iron [Fe], Copper [Cu], Zinc [Zn], Manganese [Mn], and Boron [B]) across the 21 P. vulgaris and the 17 V. unguiculata accessions. The results presented in Supplementary Table S4 reveal that the average Na content ranged between 260.4 (MP02Pv) and 103.0 mg/kg ww (CU18Pv) for P. vulgaris, while for V. unguiculata the average was ranged from 252.2 (LU33Vu) to 109.6 mg/kg ww (MA41Vu). K content ranged between 11,845.5 (CV49Pv) and 8490.8 mg/kg ww (SO14Pv) for P. vulgaris; between 10,656.3 (MA41Vu) and 8865.6 mg/kg ww (BI30Vu) for V. unguiculata. The average content of Ca encompassed values from 933.5 (CU17Pv) to 1701.8 mg/kg ww (SO14Pv) in P. vulgaris whereas in V. unguiculata from 602.7 (SO12Vu) to 1062.2 mg/kg ww (UI31Vu). On average, for P. vulgaris, the lowest Mg content was 1492.5 (SO11Pv) and the highest was 1906.4 mg/kg ww (MA21Pv); for V. unguiculata, the lowest value was 1746.0 (CV47Vu) and the highest 2340.3 mg/kg ww (UI31Vu). The P content of P. vulgaris ranged from 3119.9 (CU15Pv) to 5210.8 mg/kg ww (SO13Pv), while it ranged from 3301.8 (UI31Vu) to 5117.9 mg/kg ww (NA26Vu) for V. unguiculata. The S values varied between 1294.7 for accession MP45Pv and 2021.2 mg/kg ww for accession CU17Pv of P. vulgaris; for V. unguiculata between 1483.1 for accession CC27Vu and 2348.0 mg/kg ww for accession CN32Vu. The Fe contents attained a range of values between 49.0 (MA21Pv) and 79.5 mg/kg ww (CV49Pv) among P. vulgaris accessions, and from 39.1 (MP04Vu) to 78.0 mg/kg ww (HI25Vu) in V. unguiculata. The Cu values ranged between 6.0 (MP44Pv) and 9.9 mg/kg ww (MA42Pv) in P. vulgaris and between 4.1 (CV47Pv) and 8.7 mg/kg ww (UI31Vu) in V. unguiculata. Across P. vulgaris accessions, the Zn values varied from 17.5 (SO09Pv) to 31.9 mg/kg ww (MP02Pv) whereas in V. unguiculata the values ranged from 22.0 (BI30Vu) to 38.5 mg/kg ww (BE29Vu). The P. vulgaris accessions showed a Mn content of 13.8 (SO07Pv) to 28.3 mg/kg ww (CU15Pv) while V. unguiculata presented values of 14.8 (CV36Vu) to 38.0 mg/kg ww (HI25Vu). Finally, the B content ranged from 0.7 (SO09Pv) to 9.4 mg/kg ww (MA21Pv) for P. vulgaris and from 6.8 (MA24Vu) to 14.3 mg/kg ww (MA41Vu) in V. unguiculata.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Heatmap of the 21 Phaseolus vulgaris and 17 Vigna unguiculata accessions obtained from the chemical characterization data for the content of 11 minerals. Red and blue boxes indicate high values and low values respectively.

At the species level, V. unguiculata accessions presented highest mean values of Na (179.9 mg/kg ww), Mg (2045.0 mg/kg ww), P (4151.9 mg/kg ww), S (1919.6 mg/kg ww), Zn (30.8 mg/kg ww), Mn (23.6 mg/kg ww), and B (9.6 mg/kg ww). Contrariwise, P. vulgaris presented the highest values for K (9901.9 mg/kg ww), Ca (1277.8 mg/kg ww), Fe (64.8 mg/kg ww), and Cu (7.5 mg/kg ww).

Based on a correlation matrix, a heatmap was constructed (Fig. 4) using Euclidean distances and the UPGMA method, wherein the vertical columns are the clusters of minerals while in the horizontal lines are the clusters of African bean accessions. In the plotted grid, boxes for each factor combination are encoded by dark red colors for the highest values and dark blue for the lowest values of correlation between mineral contents and accessions. The heatmap also plots a dendrogram from a cluster analysis showing the hierarchy of values for both accessions and mineral traits. Four groups of minerals could be discriminated in Fig. 4: Group A encompasses B, Mg, S, and Zn minerals; Group B is composed of Mn and Na minerals; Group C includes Cu, Fe, and Ca; and Group D is defined by P and K. Figure 4 also reveals two clusters of accessions corresponding to the two distinct species: V. unguiculata (Cluster 1) and P. vulgaris (Cluster 2). Cluster 1 is related to a higher content of B, Mg, S, and Zn minerals defined by cluster A. Cluster 2 is associated with a higher content of Cu, Fe, and Ca minerals defined by cluster C. Cluster 1 represents the 17 V. unguiculata accessions which are discriminated by mineral group A. Cluster 2 is composed of 21 P. vulgaris accessions defined by group C. Groups B and D did not exhibit a clear pattern for the Clusters 1 and 2. Furthermore, a comparative analysis between the mineral content of the two studied species and the geographical origin of accessions did not reveal a clear pattern (Fig. 5). Nonetheless, Cabo Verde presented extreme values in P. vulgaris for the majority of minerals (B, Ca, Cu, Fe, K, Mn, Z) (Fig. 5a), while V. unguiculata showed less variation between the geographical origins (Fig. 5b).

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Variation of mineral content (mg/kg ww) and the geographical origin for the studied samples: (a) Phaseolus vulgaris (21 accessions), and (b) Vigna unguiculata (17 accessions). Geographical origins sharing the same letter are not statistically different according to the Scott-Knott test at 5% of confidence.

Cytogenomic diversity of P. vulgaris and V. unguiculata

The 38 samples of P. vulgaris (n = 21) and V. unguiculata (n = 17) collected in Africa were cultivated, 33 of them germinated and their leaves were used for flow cytometric analysis. Figure 6 illustrates a flow histogram presenting the final genome size estimation. Genome size of analyzed samples ranged between 1277.3 Mbp (V. unguiculata sample CV47Vu) and 1598.5 Mbp (V. unguiculata sample BE29Vu) (Supplementary Table S5). The average genome size of the 13 V. unguiculata samples was 1414.7 ± 86.2 Mbp and significantly larger than the average genome size of the 20 P. vulgaris samples (1337.4 ± 33.3 Mbp) (Table 1).

Figure 6.

Figure 6

Flow cytometric histogram of relative fluorescence intensities from propidium iodide-stained nuclei of Phaseolus vulgaris sample MA20Pv (Pv) and Solanum lycopersicum L. (Sl), used as an internal reference standard.

Table 1.

Comparison of the average genome size of the Phaseolus vulgaris and Vigna unguiculata accessions estimated by flow cytometry.

Species Genome size (Mbp) H.G.b
Average Stdeva
Vigna unguiculata 1414.7 86.2 a
Phaseolus vulgaris 1337.4 33.3 b

aStandard deviation.

bHomogeneous groups: accessions sharing the same letter for each mineral are not statistically different according to the Scott-Knott test at 5% of confidence.

There are no significant differences among countries (Angola, Mozambique and Cabo Verde) for V. unguiculata and P. vulgaris samples (Supplementary Tables S6 and S7). Among V. unguiculata samples, those obtained from the Angolan provinces of Bié (1543.4 Mbp) and Benguela (1598.5 Mbp) presented genome sizes larger than the remainder (Supplementary Table S8). The comparison among regions for the P. vulgaris accessions evidenced higher average genomes for the Angolan provinces of Cunene (1356.7 Mbp) and Huíla (1342.8 Mbp), and for the Mozambican province of Sofala (1336.4 Mbp) in relation to the remaining provinces under study (Supplementary Table S9).

Discussion

Our study reveals a much greater diversity of Vigna species in Africa (73 species, 63 native) than Phaseolus (5 species, 1 native), as expected14,36. This great disparity is justified by the original centers of diversity of both genera: Vigna has its centers in Africa and Asia14,37, while Phaseolus has America as its center38.

Only one Phaseolus species (P. massaiensis)9 is native to Africa, which is poorly studied and occurs only in Tanzania. The other Phaseolus (P. vulgaris, P. lunatus, P. acutifolius, and P. coccineus) are native from America and grown in Africa, where they were probably introduced during the sixteenth century as a food source39.

Based on specimen occurrence data, we found that the areas of the highest diversity of Vigna species, located in Western and Eastern Africa, were mainly associated with regions with a tropical climate. Our results are according to previous studies14,16,40, which identify these areas as significant biodiversity hotspots of African flora and specifically of Vigna genus. Eight countries (i.e. Democratic Republic of the Congo, Tanzania, Zambia, Cameroon, Burundi, Angola, Nigeria, and Malawi) present more than 20 native species, highlighting their central role in the conservation of African Vigna diversity.

The conservation status has been accessed over the last few years, but only 60.9% (39 of the 64 native species) were already evaluated according to the IUCN criteria34. Among them, six are classified in the threat categories (one critically endangered and five endangered) and one as near threatened, but this number is likely to increase in the near future, because the pressure on natural resources continues to increase in most African countries, driven by economic and population growth as well as climate change41,42. Currently, the specific threats to African native pulses species are not well known14, but some studies focusing on the conservation of native biodiversity of African legumes4143 identified deforestation, agriculture and urbanization, harvesting for medicinal uses, fires, and invasive species as the main threats. Three species are classified as Data Deficient and 25 remain unevaluated, revealing the lack of knowledge about them. The evaluation of the conservation status, as well as the study of their threats, distribution and ecology, based upon extensive fieldwork, is a required step to protect native species16,44,45. Of particular concern are V. monantha, V. bosseri and V. keraudreni, which are classified as endangered and are not preserved in gene banks.

Despite the recognized importance of African native pulses, the information available on ex situ conservation, and the germplasm collections preserved in national institutions of the three studied countries (Angola, Mozambique and Cabo Verde), is still very limited. Nevertheless, it must be highlighted the role that the International Institute of Tropical Agriculture-IITA46 have in Africa to keep collections of both crops and non-crops, in (in situ) or out (ex situ) of their natural environment. IITA’s gene bank holds over 28,000 accessions of plant material of major African food crops and maintains the world’s largest assemblage of cowpea germplasm collections with over 15,000 accessions47. As stated above, Angola, Mozambique and Cabo Verde revealed a high genetic diversity, however, no accessions of the studied species were reported in the national gene banks. Our results agree with previous studies, which recognized the lack of ex situ conservation strategies for Crop Wild Relatives native to Angola16 and Cabo Verde48,49. As Vigna and Phaseolus genera include several cultivated species and their Crop Wild Relatives (i.e., other taxa with a close genetic relationship to cultivated species), their conservation is extremely important to guarantee the supply of new genetic material, essential for the future crop improvement.

The Vigna genus includes 13 species cultivated in Africa, which constitute an essential source of nutrients for humans and domestic animals. Most of these species (7) are native to Asia and have only recently been introduced to Africa14. However, the cultivation of Vigna in Africa mainly focuses on two native species, V. unguiculata and V. subterranea.

Vigna unguiculata is one of the most important sub-Saharan Africa indigenous grain legumes, having been firstly domesticated in Northeast Africa, and secondarily in West Africa and in the Indian sub-continent15,50. Cowpea matures earlier than cereals, becoming an important source of income for the rural population before maize, millets and cassava are harvested14,24. It is widely cultivated in almost all African countries and was probably introduced around 300 BC in Europe, 200 BC in India, and in the seventeenth century to tropical America by the Spanish9.

Mineral content analyses revealed that V. unguiculata and P. vulgaris form an excellent source of minerals. Vigna unguiculata had, on average, higher content of B, Mg, S, and Zn, while P. vulgaris had more Fe, Ca, and Cu. Fe content in P. vulgaris ranged from 49.0 mg/kg (MA21Pv) to 79.5 mg/kg (CV49Pv) and 39.1 mg/kg (MP04Vu) to 78.0 mg/kg (HI25Vu) in V. unguiculata. For P. vulgaris these values were lower than the Fe contents reported by Di Bella et al.51 and Gelin et al.52, which were on average 86.2 mg/kg and 86.9 mg/kg, respectively; whilst for V. unguiculata the contents tallied with Dakora and Belane’s study53 where the obtained values ranged from 61 mg/kg to 67 mg/kg. Moreover, Yeken et al.54 found much higher values of Cu, Zn, Mn, Fe in biofortified P. vulgaris but lower values of Ca and Mg, for which our accessions show higher content. However, Gondwe et al.55 focusing on V. unguiculata from Swaziland, found much lower contents of Ca, Fe, and Zn than the content found in our study, even for improved varieties. Content variation within the same species can be explained by several cross-related reasons: (i) the nutritional content of legumes can vary greatly and is highly dependent on soil fertility, which directly influences the supply and availability of most nutrient elements56; (ii) the nutritional content is dependent and vary with different varieties and genotypes46,57; and (iii) the nutritional content is influenced by preharvest conditions of the plant, maturity of the edible product at harvest and postharvest handling and storage conditions58. Additionally, three different aspects account for the content of micronutrients in the seeds, namely micronutrient uptake, transport and remobilization from other parts of the plant, and storage capacity56. The mechanisms and proteins involved in all these processes differ for each species due to different evolutionary processes.

Our results highlight the importance of P. vulgaris and V. unguiculata as sources of essential micronutrients. Chronic deficiency of essential vitamins and minerals is a scourge affecting more than two billion people globally and account for approximately 7% of the global disease burden59. This form of undernutrition is known as the ‘hidden hunger’ and occurs due an insufficient intake and absorption of essential vitamins and minerals60. Deficiencies in zinc, iron, and iodine have the strongest negative impact on public health, but other minerals such as calcium, selenium, magnesium, and fluoride, also contribute to the health burden61. Research carried out by Muthayya et al.62 which calculated the Hidden Hunger Index (HHI-PD) for preschool-age children revealed that sub-Saharan Africa was the most affected region with high rates of anemia due to iron and vitamin-A deficiency. Moreover, a study by Joy et al.63 identified the top three mineral deficiencies, Ca being the highest, followed by Zn and I (Iodine). Regarding Fe deficiency, recent studies have noted an increasing percentage over the last 5 years, from 24.8%64 to 54%65. Therefore, the inclusion of grain beans in their diets will aid the fight against food insecurity and other several forms of malnutrition.

Analyzing the mean values of the results based on the nutrient reference values for daily reference intakes for minerals (Adults) [NRVs] values reported by the European Union66, it appears that V. unguiculata and P. vulgaris are an excellent mineral source. A usual intake of 100 mg per day is enough to reach about 50% of NRVs of K, V. unguiculata (49.0%) and P. vulgaris (49.5%); more than 50% of P, V. unguiculata (59.3%) and P. vulgaris (58.9%) and for Mg, V. unguiculata (54.5%) and P. vulgaris (45.5%).

Regarding cytogenomic diversity, our study reveals a higher genome size variation in V. unguiculata (1414.7 ± 86.2 Mbp) when compared with P. vulgaris (1337.4 ± 33.3 Mbp). However, our results do not reveal a correlation between the genome size variation and the studied locations (i.e. Eastern region of Africa: Mozambique; Western region of Africa: Angola, and in the Northeastern Atlantic Ocean: Cabo Verde Islands). Particularly, very small intraspecific variation in nuclear DNA content was found among P. vulgaris samples collected from different regions and different habitats (e.g. samples collected in humid zones of Malanje, and others in semi-arid zones of Cunene, close to the Kalahari Desert; see Supplementary Table S2). This species is introduced and more domesticated than V. unguiculata, a pattern observed in other crop species, like Daucus species as demonstrated by Nowicka et al.67. Guilengue et al.68 found a 9.2% genome size variability among a tarwi (Lupinus mutabilis Sweet) collection, an Andean crop that is believed to have been domesticated ca. 2600 years ago. The genome size variability of the P. vulgaris accessions analyzed in the present study is of 7.8%, suggesting that P. vulgaris might have undergone selective pressures within the studied African countries associated with the domestication process. On the other hand, V. unguiculata accessions analyzed in this study present a 17.6% genome size variability, showing a higher diversity and illustrating the native nature of this crop in Africa.

Crop genetic diversity is highly dynamic. Differences could be related to several factors such as agroecological conditions of cultivation, seed selection and management by the preferences of farmers in seed selection and the management of seed lots, among others, which have important effects on the chemical composition of the grains and population genetics69. Moreover, climate and growth conditions may act as mutagenic factors, causing structural changes in chromosomes (addicting and deleting regions), which result in differences in DNA among different samples of the same species70.

Comparative molecular cytogenetic analysis of native and introduced lineages could provide important information on possible karyotypic reorganization and evolution based upon regional environmental stresses. Modern plant-breeding and crop improvement programmes must be conducted following a holistic methodology and research focusing on only one aspect of a crop will not provide enough information to decide on which breeding technology may be more suitable. An initial step of plant genome mapping is the accurate estimation of nuclear genome sizes71,72. Nutrient content and genome size are known to be connected to life form, with geophytes being among the extreme examples of large genomes, linked, among other factors, to nutrient storage capacity, while genome size is usually reduced in annual species such as therophytes73. The life strategy of a species and a particular environment may limit genome size increase such as in improved polyploids, or the genome size may cause a species to adopt specific life strategies or colonize certain environments73. A priori information on distribution, genome size, capacity of storage of mineral content are thus fundamental data which allow breeding companies and governmental agricultural stakeholders to determine the applicability and interest of implementing an improvement or simple breeding programme.

Final remarks

Based on extensive research, our study exposes the great diversity of native and introduced Vigna and Phaseolus species in Africa. Our results highlight the importance of V. unguiculata and P. vulgaris as sources of essential nutrients, making them a vital resource for the poorest populations. If complemented with further investigation on genetic traits, this study may also be relevant to increase the efficiency of breeding programs for both commercial production and smallholder farming systems in Africa.

Thus, the device of holistic strategies (e.g., combining socio-economy; ecogeography; in situ and ex situ conservation; nutrigenomics) to generate metadata, will be essential to achieve the sustainable use of understudied and overused plant resources in Sub-Saharan Africa. We believe that this is a key point for further inquiry to respond to some issues raised by the Sustainable Development Goals, such as increasing nutritional wellbeing, food security, and reducing hunger and poverty.

Finally, our study highlights the lack of taxonomic, genetic and ecogeographic knowledge of native Vigna and Phaseolus, and that greater efforts should be made to improve the in situ and ex situ conservation of these species, especially the more restricted ones. The coordination of national, regional and international conservation strategies is important to ensure the preservation of native edible African flora.

Methods

Species diversity, distribution and conservation in Africa

Initial identification of Vigna and Phaseolus species in Africa was based in Herbarium data from the Instituto Superior de Agronomia of the University of Lisbon, João de Carvalho e Vasconcellos (LISI); Instituto de Investigação Científica Tropical, University of Lisbon (LISC); Museu Nacional de História Natural e da Ciência, University of Lisbon (LISU); University of Coimbra (COI); Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew (K); Natural History Museum (BM); and Meise Botanic Garden (BR).

Online databases were also accessed, namely Plants of the World Online9, African Plant Database74, Flora of Botswana75, Flora of Malawi76, Flora of Mozambique77, Flora of Zambia78, and Flora of Zimbabwe79 for information on taxonomic data and native distribution; PROTA—Plant Resources of Tropical Africa39, and the International Legume Database and Information Service80 were used for information on the cultivation status; the IUCN Red List of Threatened Species34 for information on in situ conservation status; and the Genesys Database35 to access the ex situ conservation in worldwide gene banks. Finally, scientific publications on Vigna and Phaseolus and their distribution14,36,8183 were consulted. With the information collected, we constructed a comprehensive dataset that included the scientific name of each taxon, English common names, native status in Africa, native distribution, and conservation category according to the IUCN Red List34, and ex situ conservation data.

The geographical distribution of Vigna and Phaseolus species in Africa was estimated based on occurrence data available on the GBIF database84. A total of 47,439 records of Vigna85 and 10,685 records of Phaseolus86 were downloaded with geographical coordinates. The location of each record was confirmed at country level, and the records with incorrect location or inaccurate taxonomy were deleted. The final dataset, including 43,257 occurrences of Vigna and 8907 occurrences of Phaseolus were used in the analysis of species richness (Supplementary Fig. S2). The species richness maps were constructed using a grid of 200 × 200 km and the boundaries of African countries in QGIS v.3.4.487. Finally, the diversity hotspots of Vigna genus (i.e. areas with a great number of native species) were identified and compared with the results of previous studies14.

Sampling of P. vulgaris and V. unguiculata

A total of 38 accessions (Supplementary Table S2) of the most cultivated species, P. vulgaris (n = 21) and V. unguiculata (n = 17), were collected between 2018 and 2019 in Angola (20), Mozambique (13); and Cabo Verde (5) (Supplementary Fig. S3). Each sample was divided in two parts, one was used for the chemical analysis (n = 38) and the other cultivated to obtain developed and mature leaves for flow cytometric analysis (n = 33). Cultivation took place between June 2019 and February 2020, in a greenhouse under controlled conditions (i.e., using the same kind of well-drained fertile soils in a dimensionally equal pots at an optimal temperature for germination of ± 25 °C) at Instituto Superior de Agronomia of the University of Lisbon (ISA/UL) as shown in the Fig. 7. The germination experiments were performed in triplicate for each accession. Herbarium vouchers were deposited in the Herbarium LISI and the identification of plant specimens was done by some of the authors (SC, MB and MR). Permissions to collect all the seeds used in this study were obtained. This study complies with local and national regulations.

Figure 7.

Figure 7

Cultivated samples collected in different African countries: (a) Vigna unguiculata from Malanje, Angola (MA41Vu); (b) V. unguiculata from Sofala, Mozambique (SO12Vu); (c) V. unguiculata from Santiago, Cabo Verde (CV36Vu); (d) Phaseolus vulgaris from Cunene, Angola (CU17Pv); (e) P. vulgaris from Sofala, Mozambique (SO10Pv); and (f) P. vulgaris from Santiago, Cabo Verde (CV38Pv). Plants growth under controlled conditions, between June 2019 and February 2020, at Instituto Superior de Agronomia of the University of Lisbon (ISA/UL).

Physicochemical characterization of P. vulgaris and V. unguiculata

Physical characterization

In order to complement the characterization of the study samples of P. vulgaris and V. unguiculata, a description of seed phenotypic traits was performed (i.e. quantitative: length, width, and height; and qualitative: shape, color and hilum). For each bean accession, seed length, width, and height were obtained for 10 seeds by using a digital calliper with 0.01 mm of accuracy. Specifically, seed length was measured from the base to the tip portion while the seed width was measured from the hilum to the opposite side. The mean values were recorded in millimeters. The shape and color of the bean, and the description of the hilum was obtained through direct observation of a randomized pool of 10 seeds.

Mineral analysis

Mineral contents (Na, K, Ca, Mg, P, S, Fe, Cu, Zn, Mn, B) in P. vulgaris and V. unguiculata seeds were determined by inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectrometry (ICP-OES). Grain beans were grounded into a powdery form with a stainless-steel grinder (Kunft coffee mill). A portion of 0.3 g from bean powder from each sample was weighed and subjected to the digestion process with a mixture of nitric acid and hydrochloric acid (1:3, v/v) at 105 °C for 90 min and analyzed using the Thermo Scientific iCAP 7000 Series ICP-OES spectrometer (Thermo Scientific, Cambridge, UK). Procedural blanks were obtained following the above-mentioned protocol. Calibration curves of five different concentrations were applied to calculate the concentration of each mineral. Standard solutions of minerals for ICP-OES were from Panreac (Barcelona, Spain) and all the water used was purified using a Milli-Q water system (Millipore, Bedford, MA, USA). All the measurements were carried out in triplicate and the results obtained in mg per kg wet weight.

Nuclear DNA content estimation

For each cultivated sample (n = 33), young leaves in healthy conditions were randomly collected and immediately analysed in the laboratory. Nuclear DNA content was measured by flow cytometry using Solanum lycopersicum ‘Stupické’ [2C = 1.96 pg]88 as DNA standard. Each sample was chopped with a razor blade along with the standard in the presence of 1 mL of buffer89. The nuclear suspension obtained was filtrated using a 30 μm nylon filter to separate cells from plant debris. After filtration, 50 μg/mL of propidium iodide (PI; Sigma-Aldrich) and 50 μg/mL of RNase (Sigma-Aldrich) were added to stain DNA and prevent staining of double-stranded RNA, respectively. The samples were maintained at room temperature and analyzed using a CyFlow Space flow cytometer (Sysmex, Norderstedt, Germany) as previously described by Guilengue et al.68. The reproducibility of the results was assessed using five independent replicates for each accession. FloMax software v2.4d (Sysmex) was used to measure nuclear DNA content and three graphics were generated from data measurement: fluorescence pulse integral in linear scale (FL); fluorescence pulse integral in linear scale versus time; and fluorescence pulse integral in linear scale versus side light scatter in logarithmic scale (SSC). The absolute DNA amount of a sample was calculated based on the values of the G1 peak means, as suggested by Doležel and Bartoš90:

Sample2CDNAcontent=SampleG1peakmeanstandardG1peakmean×Standard2CDNAContent

The results generated from 2C DNA (in picogram) were transformed to million base pairs using the following conversion: 1 pg = 978 Mbp91. Coefficient of variation (CV, %) of G1 peaks in the FL histograms, and estimates of the CV of the genome size of each accession were used to assess the reliability of the results.

Statistical analysis

All data measurements are presented as mean values. In order to compare morphometric measurements, mineral content, and genome size across the accessions, a Univariate analysis (UA) was performed. Test of means was carried out using Scott Knott test for all variables at 5% significance with the ScottKnott package92. To perform a multivariate analysis the mineral content data was standardized (mean = 0, and standard deviation = 1). Cluster analysis was performed based on Euclidean distance and average method for the 38 accessions (heatmap function). Results of cluster analysis were visualized with the ggplot function of ggplot2 package93. All analyses were performed in the RStudio program version 1.1.45694.

Supplementary Information

Acknowledgements

We thank the thoughtful comments of the editor and the two reviewers, which greatly improved our paper. We are grateful to Philip Havik (IHMT/UNL) for very helpful discussions and assistance with English editing. We are also grateful to Prof. Esperança Costa from Agostinho Neto University (Angola), for their continuous support and collaboration on studies related to the conservation of African Leguminosae species. Also to all the herbarium collection institutes are acknowledged for sharing research material.

Author contributions

M.M.R. conceived the idea. S.C. and M.B. performed data retrieval and prepared the databases. A.P.E.; A.C.; J.R.; E.V. and S.B. performed the field surveys. GR and PT performed the cytogenomic analyses. S.C.; A.C.; J.R.; E.V. and M.Moldão performed the chemical analyses. S.C., M.B., A.R-B.; M.Moura; P.T.; M.M.R. analyzed data. M.M.R., S.C., M.B. wrote the paper and all the other authors revised the manuscript thoroughly.

Funding

This research was funded by Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia (FCT) and Aga Khan Development Network (AKDN) under the project CVAgrobiodiversity/333111699. Also to fellowships to Sílvia Catarino (SFRH/BD/120054/2016), Anyse Pereira Essoh (SFRH/BD/135362/2017), Alberto Charrua (SFRH/BD/135360/2017), and Miguel Brilhante (UI/BD/151188/2021). The Open Access is proportionally funded by national funds through FCT I.P., in the scope of the projects Linking Landscape, Environment, Agriculture and Food Research Centre (UIDB/04129/2020) and Forest Research Centre (UIDB/00239/2020).

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Footnotes

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

These authors contributed equally: Sílvia Catarino and Miguel Brilhante.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1038/s41598-021-91929-2.

References

  • 1.Lewis GP. Legumes of the World. Royal Botanic Gardens; 2005. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.The Legume Phylogeny Working Group (LPWG) A new subfamily classification of the Leguminosae based on a taxonomically comprehensive phylogeny. Taxon. 2017;66:44–77. doi: 10.12705/661.3. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Yahara T, et al. Global legume diversity assessment: Concepts, key indicators, and strategies. Taxon. 2013;62:249–266. doi: 10.12705/622.12. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Odendo M, Bationo A, Kimani S, et al. Socio-economic contribution of legumes to livelihoods in Sub-Saharan Africa. In: Bationo A, et al., editors. Fighting Poverty in Sub-Saharan Africa: The Multiple Roles of Legumes in Integrated Soil Fertility Management. Springer; 2011. pp. 27–46. [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Dakora FD, Keya SO. Contribution of legume nitrogen fixation to sustainable agriculture in Sub-Saharan Africa. Soil Biol. Biochem. 1997;29:809–817. doi: 10.1016/S0038-0717(96)00225-8. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Ajeigde HA, Singh BB, Osenj TO. Cowpea-cereal intercrop productivity in the Sudan savanna zone of Nigeria as affected by planting pattern, crop variety and pest management. Afr. Crop Sci. J. 2005;13:269–279. [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Rahmanian M, Batello C, Calles T. Pulse Crops for Sustainable Farms in Sub-Saharan Africa. FAO; 2018. [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Rawal V, Navarro DK. The Global Economy of Pulses. FAO; 2017. [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Plants of the World Online. http://powo.science.kew.org (2020).
  • 10.Broughton WJ, et al. Beans (Phaseolus spp.)—Model food legumes. Plant Soil. 2003;252:55–128. doi: 10.1023/A:1024146710611. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Delgado-Salinas A, Bibler R, Lavin M. Phylogeny of the genus Phaseolus (Leguminosae): A recent diversification in an ancient landscape. Syst. Bot. 2006;31:779–791. doi: 10.1600/036364406779695960. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Greenway PJ. Origins of some East African food plants: Part V. East Afr. Agric. J. 1945;11:56–63. [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Wortmann CS, Allen DJ. African Bean Production Environments: Their Definition, Characteristics and Constraints. Occasional Publication Series 11. CIAT; 1994. [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Maxted N, et al. African Vigna: Systematic and Ecogeographic Studies. International Plant Genetic Resource Institute; 2004. [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Singh BB. Cowpea: The Food Legume of the 21st Century. Crop Science Society of America Inc.; 2014. [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Catarino S, et al. Conservation priorities for African Vigna species: Unveiling Angola’s diversity hotspots. Glob. Ecol. Conserv. 2021;25:e01415. doi: 10.1016/j.gecco.2020.e01415. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Vidigal P, Romeiras MM, Monteiro F. Crops diversification and the role of orphan legumes to improve the Sub-Saharan Africa farming systems. In: Hasanuzzaman M, editor. Sustainable Crop Production. IntechOpen; 2019. [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Maréchal R. Etude taxonomique d'un groupe complexe d'espèces des genres Phaseolus et Vigna (Papilionaceae) sur la base de données morphologiques et polliniques, traitées par l'analyse informatique. Boissiera. 1978;28:1–273. [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Peksen E, Peksen A, Gulumser A. Leaf and stomata characteristics and tolerance of cowpea cultivars to drought stress based on drought tolerance indices under rainfed and irrigated conditions. Int. J. Curr. Microbiol. Appl. Sci. 2014;3:626–634. [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Iqbal A, Khalil IA, Ateeq N, Khan MS. Nutritional quality of important food legumes. Food Chem. 2006;97:331–335. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2005.05.011. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.African Orphan Crops Consortium. http://africanorphancrops.org/meet-the-crops/ (2021)
  • 22.Boukar O, et al. Cowpea. In: de Ron AM, et al., editors. Grain Legumes. Springer; 2015. pp. 219–250. [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Animasaun DA, Oyedeji S, Azeez YK, Mustapha OT, Azeez MA. Genetic variability study among ten cultivars of cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L. Walp) using morpho-agronomic traits and nutritional composition. J. Agric. Sci. 2015;10:119–130. [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Timko MP, Singh BB. Cowpea, a multifunctional legume. In: Moore PH, Ming R, editors. Plant Genetics and Genomics: Crops and Models. Springer; 2008. pp. 227–258. [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Wortmann SC, Kirkby AR, Eledu AC, Allen JD. Atlas of Common Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) Production in Africa. International Centre for Tropical Agriculture; 2004. [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Guignard MS, et al. Genome size and ploidy influence angiosperm species' biomass under nitrogen and phosphorus limitation. New Phytol. 2016;210:1195–1206. doi: 10.1111/nph.13881. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Sheidai M, et al. Genetic diversity and genome size variability in Linum austriacum (Lineaceae) populations. Biochem. Syst. Ecol. 2014;57:20–26. doi: 10.1016/j.bse.2014.07.014. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Kron P, Suda J, Husband BC. Applications of flow cytometry to evolutionary and population biology. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 2007;38:847–876. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.38.091206.095504. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Wu YQ, et al. Genetic analyses of Chinese Cynodon accessions by flow cytometry and AFLP markers. Crop Sci. 2016;46:917–926. doi: 10.2135/cropsci2005.08.0256. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Parida A, Raina SN, Narayan RKJ. Quantitative DNA variation between and within chromosome complements of Vigna species (Fabaceae) Genetica. 1990;82:125–133. doi: 10.1007/BF00124642. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Nagl W, Treviranus A. A flow cytometric analysis of the nuclear 2C DNA content in 17 Phaseolus species (53 genotypes) Bot. Acta. 1995;108:403–406. doi: 10.1111/j.1438-8677.1995.tb00513.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Barow M, Meister A. Endopolyploidy in seed plants is differently correlated to systematics, organ, life strategy and genome size. Plant Cell Environ. 2003;26:571–584. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-3040.2003.00988.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Lonardi S, et al. The genome of cowpea (Vigna unguiculata [L.] Walp.) Plant J. 2019;98:767–782. doi: 10.1111/tpj.14349. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Version 2020-2. https://www.iucnredlist.org/ (2020).
  • 35.Genesys. Plant Genetic Resources Accession. https://www.genesys-pgr.org/ (2021).
  • 36.Pope GV, Polhill RM. Flora Zambesiaca, part 5. Royal Botanic Gardens; 2001. [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Tomooka N, Vaughan DA, Moss H, Maxted N. The Asian Vigna: Genus Vigna Subgenus Ceratotropis Genetic Resources. Kluwer Academic Publishers; 2002. [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Debouck DG. Primary diversification of Phaseolus in the Americas: Three centers. Plant Genet. Resour. Newsl. 1986;67:2–8. [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Plant Resources of Tropical Africa. https://www.prota4u.org/database/ (2021).
  • 40.Linder HP. The evolution of African plant diversity. Front. Ecol. Evol. 2014;2:38. doi: 10.3389/fevo.2014.00038. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Romeiras MM, Figueira R, Duarte MC, Beja P, Darbyshire I. Documenting biogeographical patterns of African timber species using herbarium records: A conservation perspective based on native trees from Angola. PLoS ONE. 2014;9:e103403. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0103403. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Catarino S, et al. Spatial and temporal trends of burnt area in angola: Implications for natural vegetation and protected area management. Diversity. 2020;12:307. doi: 10.3390/d12080307. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Catarino S, Duarte MC, Costa E, Carrero PG, Romeiras MM. Conservation and sustainable use of the medicinal Leguminosae plants from Angola. PeerJ. 2019;7:e6736. doi: 10.7717/peerj.6736. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Romeiras MM, et al. IUCN Red List assessment of the Cape Verde endemic flora: Towards a global strategy for plant conservation in Macaronesia. Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 2016;180:413–425. doi: 10.1111/boj.12370. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Gomes AM, et al. Drought response of cowpea (Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp.) landraces at leaf physiological and metabolite profile levels. Environ. Exp. Bot. 2020;175:104060. doi: 10.1016/j.envexpbot.2020.104060. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.The International Institute of Tropical Agriculture (IITA). https://www.iita.org/ (2021)
  • 47.Fatokun C, et al. Genetic diversity and population structure of a mini-core subset from the world cowpea (Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp.) germplasm collection. Sci. Rep. 2018;8:16035. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-34555-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Rocha V, Duarte MC, Catarino S, Duarte I, Romeiras MM. Cabo Verde’s Poaceae flora: A reservoir of crop wild relatives diversity for crop improvement. Front. Plant Sci. 2021;12:630217. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2021.630217. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Brilhante M, et al. Tackling food insecurity in Cabo Verde Islands: The nutritional, agricultural and environmental values of the legume species. Foods. 2021;10:206. doi: 10.3390/foods10020206. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Pasquet RS. Wild cowpea (Vigna unguiculata) evolution. In: Pickersgill B, Lock JM, editors. Advances in Legume Systematics 8: Legumes of Economic Importance. Royal Botanic Gardens; 1996. pp. 95–100. [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Di Bella G, et al. Mineral composition of some varieties of beans from Mediterranean and Tropical areas. Int. J. Food Sci. Nutr. 2016;67:239–248. doi: 10.3109/09637486.2016.1153610. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Gelin JR, Forster S, Grafton KF, McClean PE, Rojas-Cifuentes GA. Analysis of seed zinc and other minerals in a recombinant inbred population of navy bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) Crop Sci. 2007;47:1361–1366. doi: 10.2135/cropsci2006.08.0510. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Dakora FD, Belane AK. Evaluation of protein and micronutrient levels in edible cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L. Walp) leaves and seeds. Front. Sustain. Food Syst. 2019;3:70. doi: 10.3389/fsufs.2019.00070. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Yeken MZ, Akpolat H, Karaköy T, Çiftçi V. Assessment of mineral content variations for biofortification of the bean seed. Int. J. Agric. Sci. 2018;4:261–269. [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Gondwe TM, Alamu EO, Mdziniso P, Maziya-Dixon B. Cowpea (Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp) for food security: An evaluation of end-user traits of improved varieties in Swaziland. Sci. Rep. 2019;9:15991. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-52360-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Sperotto RA, Ricachenevsky FK, Williams LE, Vasconcelos MW, Menguer PK. From soil to seed: Micronutrient movement into and within the plant. Front. Plant Sci. 2014;5:438. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2014.00438. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Maziya-Dixon B, Kling JG, Menkir A, Dixon A. Genetic variation in total carotene, iron, and zinc contents of maize and cassava genotypes. Food Nutr. Bull. 2000;21:419–422. doi: 10.1177/156482650002100415. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Shewfelt RL. Sources of variation in the nutrient content of agricultural commodities from the farm to the consumer. J. Food Qual. 1990;13:37–54. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-4557.1990.tb00004.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.World Health Organization. The World Health Report 2006: Working Together for Health. https://www.who.int/whr/2006/whr06_en.pdf?ua=1 (2006).
  • 60.Gödecke T, Stein AJ, Qaim M. The global burden of chronic and hidden hunger: Trends and determinants. Glob. Food Sec. 2018;17:21–29. doi: 10.1016/j.gfs.2018.03.004. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Shankar AH, et al. Mineral deficiencies. In: Ryan ET, et al., editors. Hunter's Tropical Medicine and Emerging Infectious Diseases. Elsevier; 2020. pp. 1048–1054. [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Muthayya S, et al. The global hidden hunger indices and maps: An advocacy tool for action. PLoS ONE. 2013;8:e67860. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0067860. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Joy EJ, et al. Dietary mineral supplies in Africa. Physiol. Plant. 2014;151:208–229. doi: 10.1111/ppl.12144. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.World Health Organization. World health statistics 2015. https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/170250/9789240694439_eng.pdf;jsessionid=9CFCB446F9217B60415DD216E70F6A49?sequence=1 (2015).
  • 65.Muriuki JM, et al. Estimating the burden of iron deficiency among African children. BMC Med. 2020;18:31. doi: 10.1186/s12916-020-1502-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Official Journal of the European Union. Regulation (Eu) No 1169/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 October 2011. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32011R1169&from=EN (2011).
  • 67.Nowicka A, et al. Nuclear DNA content variation within the genus Daucus (Apiaceae) determined by flow cytometry. Sci. Hortic. 2016;209:132–138. doi: 10.1016/j.scienta.2016.06.023. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Guilengue N, Alves S, Talhinhas P, Neves-Martins J. Genetic and genomic diversity in a tarwi (Lupinus mutabilis Sweet) germplasm collection and adaptability to Mediterranean climate conditions. Agronomy. 2020;10:21. doi: 10.3390/agronomy10010021. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Chable V, et al. Embedding cultivated diversity in society for agro-ecological transition. Sustainability. 2020;12:784. doi: 10.3390/su12030784. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Knight CA, Molinari NA, Petrov DA. The large genome constraint hypothesis: Evolution, ecology and phenotype. Ann. Bot. 2005;95:177–190. doi: 10.1093/aob/mci011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Pati K, Zhang F, Batley J. First report of genome size and ploidy of the underutilized leguminous tuber crop Yam Bean (Pachyrhizus erosus and P. tuberosus) by flow cytometry. Plant Genet. Resour. 2019;17:456–459. doi: 10.1017/S1479262119000170. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Sliwinska E. Flow cytometry—A modern method for exploring genome size and nuclear DNA synthesis in horticultural and medicinal plant species. Folia Hortic. 2018;30:103–128. doi: 10.2478/fhort-2018-0011. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Veselý P, Bureš P, Šmarda P. Nutrient reserves may allow for genome size increase: Evidence from comparison of geophytes and their sister non-geophytic relatives. Ann. Bot. 2013;112:1193–1200. doi: 10.1093/aob/mct185. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.African Plant Database. http://www.ville-ge.ch/musinfo/bd/cjb/africa/index. (2021).
  • 75.Hyde, M. A., Wursten, B. T., Ballings, P. & Coates Palgrave, M. Flora of Botswana. https://www.botswanaflora.com (2021).
  • 76.Hyde, M. A., Wursten, B. T., Ballings, P. & Coates Palgrave, M. Flora of Malawi. http://www.malawiflora.com (2021).
  • 77.Hyde, M. A., Wursten, B. T., Ballings, P. & Coates Palgrave, M. Flora of Mozambique. http://www.mozambiqueflora.com (2021)
  • 78.Bingham, M. G., Willemen, A., Wursten, B. T., Ballings, P. & Hyde, M. A. Flora of Zambia http://www.zambiaflora.com (2021).
  • 79.Hyde, M. A., Wursten, B. T., Ballings, P. & Coates Palgrave, M. Flora of Zimbabwe. http://www.zimbabweflora.co.zw (2021).
  • 80.International Legume Database & Information Service. https://ildis.org/LegumeWeb (2020).
  • 81.Exell, A.W. & Fernandes, A. Conspectus florae angolensis. Vol. 3, No. 2. Leguminosae (Papilionoideae: Hedysareae-Sophoreae) (Junta de Investigações do Ultramar, 1966)
  • 82.Pasquet RS. Notes on the genus Vigna (Leguminosae-Papilionoideae) Kew Bull. 2001;56:223–227. doi: 10.2307/4119438. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.van Zonneveld M, et al. Mapping patterns of abiotic and biotic stress resilience uncovers conservation gaps and breeding potential of Vigna wild relatives. Sci. Rep. 2020;10:2111. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-58646-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Global Biodiversity Information Facility. https://www.gbif.org/ (2021).
  • 85.GBIF Occurrence Download—Vigna. 10.15468/dl.bsjsk5 (2021).
  • 86.GBIF Occurrence Download—Phaseolus.10.15468/dl.kjw72 (2021).
  • 87.QGIS Development Team. QGIS Geographic Information System. Open Source Geospatial Foundation Project. http://qgis.osgeo.org (2021).
  • 88.Doležel J, Sgorbati S, Lucretti S. Comparison of three DNA fluorochromes for flow cytometric estimation of nuclear DNA content in plants. Physiol. Plant. 1992;85:625–631. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-3054.1992.tb04764.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Loureiro J, Rodriguez E, Doležel J, Santos C. Two new nuclear isolation buffers for plant DNA flow cytometry: A test with 37 species. Ann. Bot. 2007;100:875–888. doi: 10.1093/aob/mcm152. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Doležel J, Bartoš J. Plant DNA flow cytometry and estimation of nuclear genome size. Ann. Bot. 2005;95:99–110. doi: 10.1093/aob/mci005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Doležel J, Bartoš J, Voglmayr H, Greilhuber J. Nuclear DNA content and genome size of trout and human. Cytometry. 2003;51:127–128. doi: 10.1002/cyto.a.10013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Jelihovschi EG, Faria JC, Allaman IB. ScottKnott: A package for performing the Scott-Knott clustering algorithm in R. TEMA. 2014;15:3–17. doi: 10.5540/tema.2014.015.01.0003. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Wickham H. ggplot2: Elegant Graphics for Data Analysis. Springer; 2016. [Google Scholar]
  • 94.R Core Team. R: A language and environment for statistical computing https://www.R-project.org/ (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, 2020).

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials


Articles from Scientific Reports are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES