Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Scientific Reports logoLink to Scientific Reports
. 2021 Jun 18;11:12841. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-91559-8

Uridine and pyruvate protect T cells’ proliferative capacity from mitochondrial toxic antibiotics: a clinical pilot study

Stefano Battaglia 1,2,#, Stefania De Santis 1,3,#, Monica Rutigliano 2, Fabio Sallustio 1, Angela Picerno 2, Maria Antonia Frassanito 4, Ingo Schaefer 5, Angelo Vacca 4, Antonio Moschetta 1, Peter Seibel 5, Michele Battaglia 2,✉, Gaetano Villani 6,✉
PMCID: PMC8213784  PMID: 34145306

Abstract

Antibiotics that inhibit bacterial protein or nucleic acid synthesis and function can exert an off-target action on mitochondria (mitotoxic antibiotics), making actively dividing mammalian cells dependent on uridine and pyruvate supplementation. Based on this rationale, we carried out, for the first time, a randomized pilot study in 55 patients with asymptomatic bacteriuria or positive sperm culture, each treated with a single mitotoxic antibiotic with or without oral supplementation of uridine + pyruvate (Uripyr, Mitobiotix, Italy). The in vivo and ex vivo data show a a 3.4-fold higher value in the differential (before and after the antibiotic treatment) lymphocytes count and a 3.7-fold increase in the percentage of dividing T cells, respectively, in the Uripyr vs the control group. Our findings lay the groundwork to enhance the synergy between antibiotics and the immune system in order to optimize the administration protocols and widen the application potentials of antibiotic therapies as well as to re-evaluate old “forgotten” molecules to fight bacterial infections in the antibiotics resistance era.

Subject terms: Antibiotics, Mitochondria, Urinary tract infection

Introduction

Antibiotics are natural or synthetic molecules used to fight microbial infections thanks to their ability to kill bacteria (bactericidal effect) and/or to prevent their reproduction (bacteriostatic effect)1,2. Since approved antibiotics, at therapeutic dosages, are generally safe and well-tolerated by patients, they have been widely used in clinical practice in the last century. However, most of them have side effects ranging from fever, nausea and major allergic reactions, to variations in the blood count, liver malfunction and damage to bone marrow2.

Based on their mechanisms of action, antibiotics can be subdivided into three main groups: (1) inhibitors of cell wall synthesis/function (e.g. β-lactams); (2) inhibitors of nucleic acids synthesis/function (e.g. sulfonamides, quinolones); (3) inhibitors of protein synthesis (e.g. aminoglycosides, macrolides, tetracyclines, oxazolidinones, amphenicols). Antibiotic adverse effects are not fully understood at the cellular and molecular level. While antibiotics of the first group are selective for bacterial structures, those binding bacterial ribosomes or enzymes involved in DNA replication and transcription have been shown to exert off-target toxicity on mitochondria (mitotoxicity)3.

Mitochondria are semi-autonomous organelles possessing a replicating circular DNA (mtDNA) that encodes 13 protein subunits of the oxidative phosphorylation (OXPHOS) complexes, plus 22 transfer RNAs (tRNAs) and two ribosomal RNAs (12S and 16S rRNAs) needed for their protein synthesis machinery. Due to the endosymbiotic origin of mitochondria, organellar proteins, ribosomes, and DNA share a close evolutionary proximity with their bacterial counterparts.

Mitochondria have the main task of generating ATP through OXPHOS; hence, inhibiting mtDNA replication and/or expression will force a cellular energy metabolism shift to anaerobic glycolysis. This change is exacerbated in the phenotype of mtDNA-depleted (rho0) cells that require exogenous pyruvate and uridine to bypass the need of a functional mitochondrial respiration for their survival and proliferation4. Pyruvate supplementation is needed to replenish cellular NAD+ through lactate dehydrogenase activity4, as well as to support aspartate biosynthesis5 when the mitochondrial respiratory capacity is lacking or severely reduced. Uridine supplementation complements the lack of endogenous pyrimidine biosynthesis due to stalling of the dihydroorotate dehydrogenase (DHODH) activity which is coupled to the respiratory chain to carry out the efficient oxidation of mitochondrial ubiquinol6. Interestingly, it has recently been demonstrated that the fluoroquinolone antibiotic ciprofloxacin that targets bacterial DNA gyrase and topoisomerase IV, also inhibits mitochondrial topoisomerase 2, altering mtDNA topology and causing a drastic reduction of the mtDNA copy number and mtDNA transcription, with subsequent stalling of cell proliferation and differentiation in human cells7. Therefore, it is evident that the adverse effects of mitotoxic antibiotics may be more marked in actively dividing cells, such as skin cells, epithelial cells of the gastrointestinal tract and blood cells, in particular immune cells.

Indeed, some of the best known adverse effects like neutropenia, anaphylaxis and allergy underlie the presence of a tight interaction between antibiotic treatment and immune response. The search for immune implications of antibiotic therapies has mostly addressed lymphocytes transformation, chemotaxis, and hypersensitivity1,8–10. Moreover, in the context of the ever-increasing evidence of the involvement of mitochondria in the proper function of the adaptive and innate immune system11,12, immune dysfunctions and an increased incidence of infections have been reported in patients with mitochondrial diseases13,14. On the other hand, a direct effect of mitotoxic antibiotics on the respiratory capacity of immune cells has also been demonstrated in human and animal studies15,16.

To translate the above observations into clinical practice, we carried out a randomized pilot study in patients treated with mitotoxic antibiotics (levofloxacin, ciprofloxacin, tigecycline, doxycycline, linezolid, erythromycin), with or without oral supplementation of 450 mg of uridine and 6 g of pyruvate (Uripyr, Mitobiotix, Italy) per day. Data obtained from this study demonstrate, for the first time, that simple metabolic supplementation is able to rescue the immune-suppressive action of mitotoxic antibiotics. Our findings will be discussed in terms of their impact on different aspects of antibiotic medicine.

Results

In vivo effect of Uripyr supplementation on patients treated with mitotoxic antibiotics

The subjects enrolled in this study presented asymptomatic bacteriuria (ABU) and/or positive sperm culture. According to EAU guidelines17, asymptomatic bacteriuria (ABU) is defined as a bacterial growth in the urine of ≥ 105 CFU/ml in patients without lower urinary tract symptoms18. ABU is a common situation in clinical practice and can often be due to bacterial perineal colonization, particularly in elderly subjects suffering from benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) with residual urine. Unlike in urine culture, the presence of bacteria in sperm culture has no referential bacterial growth values. Following EAU guidelines, antibiotic treatment of ABU or positive sperm culture is not indicated to avoid the risk of selecting antimicrobial resistance or of eradicating a potentially protective strain. The indication for treatment in our selected population was the prophylaxis for invasive urological procedures breaching the mucosa, such as cystoscopy, retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS), prostate biopsy and other endourological maneuvers and/or as an attempt to ameliorate the quality of semen prior to the assisted reproduction19. The demographic and clinical features of the general population are summarized in Table 1. Data from subpopulations of patients analyzed for hemogram and PBMCs evaluations are reported in Supplementary Tables 1 and 2, respectively. In each table, the number and the relative percentage of subjects treated with different types of antibiotics are indicated (see Fig. 1, Table 1, and Supplementary Tables 1 and 2).

Table 1.

Demographic and clinical features of the enrolled patients.

Variable Uripyr group Control group NA
Number 28 27 –
Age (years)* 58.32 ± 16.12 53.78 ± 16.73
BMI (kg/m2)* 25.46 ± 2.86 25.81 ± 3.30 5
WBC (T0) (× 103/μL)** 6.50 [1.89] 6.43 [1.76] 4
WBC (TEND) (× 103/μL)** 6.31 [1.54] 5.54 [1.67] 5
Δ WBC (× 103/μL)** 0.01 [1.72]  − 0.60 [1.81] 2
Neutr. count (T0) (× 103/μL)* 4.20 ± 1.67 4.08 ± 2.00 3
Neutr. count (TEND) (× 103/μL)* 3.46 ± 0.93 3.01 ± 0.91 5
Δ Neutr. (× 103/μL)*  − 0.58 ± 1.75  − 1.25 ± 2.39 2
Mono. count (T0) (× 103/μL)* 0.50 ± 0.20 0.43 ± 0.13 4
Mono. count (TEND) (× 103/μL)* 0.46 ± 0.15 0.43 ± 0.19 5
Δ Mono. (× 103/μL)*  − 0.02 ± 0.18  − 0.04 ± 0.19 2
Lymph. count (T0) (× 103/μL)** 2.05 [0.52] 1.86 [0.77] 4
Lymph. count (TEND) (× 103/μL)** 2.36 [0.92] 1. 94 [0.94] 5
Δ Lymph. (× 103/μL)** 0.36 [0.45] 0.09 [0.62] 2
Sex
Male 21 (75.00) 23 (85.18)
Female 7 (25.00) 4 (14.81)
Smoke
Non smokers 25 (89.28) 22 (84.61) 1
Smokers 3 (10.71) 4 (15.38)
General comorbidity
Absence 16 (57.14) 16 (59.25)
Presence 12 (42.85) 11 (40.74)
Nephrological disease
Absence 26 (92.85) 24 (88.88)
Presence 2 (7.14) 3 (11.11)
Nephrolithiasis
Absence 26 (92.85) 26 (96.29)
Presence 2 (7.14) 1 (3.70)
Germ location
Urine 18 (64.28) 11 (40.74)
Sperm 10 (35.72) 16 (59.26)
Antibiotic treatment
Quinolones 20 (71.42) 16 (59.25)
Macrolides 0 (00.00) 4 (14.81)
Tetracyclines 8 (28.57) 6 (22.22)
Oxazolidinones 0 (00.00) 1 (3.70)
Open in a new tab

Values are expressed as mean ± Standard Deviation or median [IQR] respectively for normal (*) and non-normal (**) distributed numeric variables, and with n (%) for categorical ones. Each item was compared among the 2 groups using t-test or Mann–Whitney’s U test for quantitative variable and Pearson χ2 test for categorical ones. A level of significance of P < 0.05 (two-sided) was used to compare Uripyr and control group.

NA number of patients for which the corresponding data were not available, BMI Body Mass Index, WBC (T0) white blood cells count at baseline (T0), WBC (TEND) WBCs count at the end of treatment (TEND), Δ WBC differential count of WBCs (TEND − T0), Neutr. (T0) neutrophils count at baseline (T0), Neutr. (TEND) neutrophils count at the end of treatment (TEND), Δ Neutr. differential count of neutrophils (TEND − T0), Mono. (T0) monocytes count at baseline (T0), Mono. (TEND) monocytes count at the end of treatment (TEND), Δ Mono. differential count of monocytes (TEND − T0), Lymph. (T0) lymphocytes count at baseline (T0), Lymph. (TEND) lymphocytes count at the end of treatment (TEND), Δ Lymph. differential count of lymphocytes (TEND − T0).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Open in a new tab

Flow chart for the selection of study population.

We firstly investigated if oral supplementation with Uripyr (Mitobiotix, Italy) during antibiotic therapy can induce an in vivo effect. For this reason, we calculated the differential blood cell count in 48 patients between the end of the antibiotic treatment (TEND) and the baseline (T0). Our data showed no significant difference in the White Blood Cells (WBCs) count when comparing the Uripyr group with the control group (Fig. 2a). A similar trend was found for the monocytes (t = − 0.87, df = 45.79) and neutrophils (t = 0.70, df = 43) counts (Fig. 2b,c, respectively). By contrast, a 3.4-fold significant difference was found in the lymphocytes count showing a delta value of 0.34 [0.45] in the Uripyr group versus 0.10 [0.52] in the control group (Fig. 2d, p < 0.05). This relatively small effect in the differential lymphocyte count, while being indicative for a possible protection by uridine and pyruvate supplementation on the lymphocyte survival/replication during the basic therapy with a single mitotoxic antibiotic, can acquire a more significant clinical impact in terms of immune response in the case of long-term and/or combinatorial antibiotic therapies.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Open in a new tab

Modulation of blood count by Uripyr oral supplementation in mitotoxic antibiotic-treated patients. Differential value of White Blood Cells (WBCs, a), monocytes (b), neutrophils (c) and lymphocytes (d) counts, calculated as delta value between the end of the antibiotic treatment (TEND) and the baseline (T0) in the Uripyr and the control group. Data are expressed as median and [IQR] for a and d and mean ± SD for (b) and (c). *p < 0.05 Plots and graphs were drawn up using the R38.

Rescue of proliferative capacity of T cells by Uripyr supplementation in patients treated with mitotoxic antibiotics

To better understand the modulation by Uripyr oral supplementation of the antibiotic-dependent effects on immune cells, we performed an ex vivo proliferation test on cultured PBMCs from 22 patients. Lymphocyte proliferation assays are largely used in clinical diagnosis for monitoring the immune function efficiency20. In this assay, ex vivo cultured lymphocytes are challenged with cell-specific activation and expansion stimulus. Specifically, our ex vivo study was performed in a new experimental setting in which PBMCs isolated from Uripyr and control group at the end of the antibiotic treatment (TEND) were cultured in autologous serum, thus avoiding the exogenous supplementation of essential microelements and metabolites normally done with laboratory culture media as well as maintaining blood cells in their specific physiological environment. Since the proliferative stimulus utilized in our assay is specific for T cells, we analyzed the cytofluorimetric profile of CD3+ cell populations in 12 patients from the Uripyr group and 10 patients from the control group. Cytofluorimetric analysis of CD3+ cells gated from total PBMCs showed a 3.7-fold increase in the percentage of dividing cells in the Uripyr group (39.71 ± 4.93) as compared to the control group (10.84 ± 2.77) (Fig. 3, p ≤ 0.0001). This result demonstrates that Uripyr supplementation sustains and protects the T cell proliferative capacity during therapies with mitotoxic antibiotics.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Open in a new tab

Effects of Uripyr oral supplementation on the ex vivo proliferation of CD3+ gated cells from PBMCs of mitotoxic antibiotic-treated patients. (a) Representative overlay histograms for CFSE staining of CD3+ gated cells from PBMCs of Uripyr and control group. The histograms indicate the proliferating ability of unstimulated (grey histograms) and TransAct stimulated (black histograms) cells. (b) The mean percentage of dividing CD3+ gated cells from PBMCs was calculated as delta value of TransAct stimulated vs. unstimulated cells after antibiotic treatment—with and without Uripyr supplement (white and black bars, respectively). Data are expressed as mean ± SEM. ***p ≤ 0.0001.

Discussion

Antibiotics are the first-line therapy for the treatment and prevention of bacterial infections, but they can have multiple off-target actions on human cells causing a wide range of adverse effects2. While antibiotics are well tolerated by most people, some side effects can become very serious or even lethal, depending on physiological (e.g. age, pregnancy) and/or specific pathological conditions (e.g. immunodepression, comorbidities, malnutrition). In the case of commonly used antibiotics, the large numbers of people suffering short-term or chronic adverse effects have drawn attention back to drug safety concerns, in some cases leading to an official warning being issued for a very restricted therapeutic usage, as in the recent case of quinolone antibiotics21.

In the present paper, we have focused our attention on the effects of mitotoxic antibiotics on immune cells. Due to their off-target inhibition of mitochondrial protein synthesis and DNA replication and transcription, mitotoxic antibiotics can cause actively dividing cells to become dependent on uridine and pyruvate supplementation for their growth, as in the case of mtDNA–depleted (rho0) cells. In this context, we carried out a clinical pilot study in 55 patients with ABU and positive sperm cultures undergoing treatment with mitotoxic antibiotics, with or without uridine + pyruvate (Uripyr, Mitobiotix, Italy) supplementation, to avoid the risk of urinary sepsis, according to EAU guidelines17. Our data, obtained both in vivo and by a modified cell proliferation assay of isolated PBMCs cultured ex vivo in autologous serum, show a striking protection of the T cell proliferative capacity in the Uripyr supplementation group.

Mitochondria are currently taking a center stage in immunobiology, not only in terms of bioenergetic functions but also as metabolic and signaling hubs of immune cells22,23. In particular, upon antigen recognition, T cells undergo a rapid clonal expansion and differentiate into specific effector subsets whose functions are counteracted by regulatory T cells (Treg). After these processes, only long-living memory T cells survive and can promote a faster and stronger response to a secondary challenge of the same nature24. Therefore, mitochondria may be seen as master metabolic regulators of T lymphocytes thanks to their ability to modulate different stages of T cell adaptive responses including migration, activation, proliferation, differentiation, memory phase, and exhaustion25. Naïve T cells predominantly use OXPHOS as the principal source of energy, while activated T cells exhibit higher glycolysis. During the T cells differentiation process, a shift towards aerobic glycolysis induces the generation of proinflammatory T cell subsets (Th1 and Th17), while the promotion of OXPHOS leads to the onset of a regulatory phenotype for T cells (Treg and memory T cells)26.

In this context, clinical and experimental data have recently demonstrated that the immune system and, specifically, T cells require a functional mitochondrial respiratory chain27. Firstly, a retrospective analysis showing recurrent or severe infections in a cohort of pediatric patients with mitochondrial diseases prompted the authors to characterize their T cell populations. The work revealed a baseline paucity of memory T cells as well as leukopenia provoked by episodes of acute infections. Then, they created a mouse model with a T cell-specific knockout of the COX10 gene (TCox10−/−) encoding an essential assembly factor for cytochrome c oxidase, i.e. the terminal enzyme of the mitochondrial respiratory chain. The TCox10−/− mice displayed severe abnormalities in T cell activation, differentiation and function as well as an impaired immune response to vaccines and viral infections27. In line with the above findings, since the three catalytic subunits of cytochrome c oxidase are encoded by mtDNA, mitotoxic antibiotics by lowering the mtDNA copy number (as in the case of fluoroquinolones), or by inhibiting the mitochondrial protein synthesis, would have a detrimental impact on T cells, as we did indeed observe in our work. It would be interesting to test the effect of uridine and pyruvate supplementation on both the phenotype of TCox10−/− mice and on the basic properties of the immune system in patients affected by mitochondrial disorders.

Greater adverse effects by mitotoxic antibiotics could occur both in individuals with reduced mitochondrial capacity and/or with primary or acquired immunodeficiencies. In particular, the decay of mitochondrial function and immunosenescence are co-existing and possibly related hallmarks of aging28. For this reason, adjuvant supplementation with uridine and pyruvate would also be desirable when treating elderly people with mitotoxic antibiotics and/or to boost their immune system for a better response to vaccines29.

Besides its classical role in RNA and DNA synthesis, uridine can have multi-targeted effects due to its conversion or incorporation in other molecules with different biological actions30. Therefore, the inhibition of endogenous uridine biosynthesis by mitotoxic antibiotics can be associated with other tissue-specific adverse effects. For instance, uridine triphosphate (UTP) is used to activate glucose-1P to UDP-glucose, then oxidized to UDP-glucuronate, required for the biosynthesis of glycosaminoglycans, such as heparan sulfate, chondroitin sulfate and hyaluronic acid. These essential components of the extracellular matrix interact with collagens and other proteins, thus playing an essential role in connective tissue function. In this light, the increased risk associated to the use of fluoroquinolones31, of collagen-related adverse effects such as tendinitis and tendon rupture, aortic aneurysm or aortic dissection, might also be prevented by uridine and pyruvate supplementation during long-term or recurrent therapies with this group of antibiotics.

Moreover, protecting the immune system during mitotoxic antibiotic therapies could be of the utmost importance to reduce the onset of antibiotic resistance. In fact, during bacterial infections, a synergic action of the antimicrobial activity of the antibiotic together with a first-line defense by cell-mediated immunity towards antibiotic-resistant, persistent or tolerating bacteria, could more efficiently achieve a complete eradication of the pathogen, reducing the risk of recurrent infections.

Our findings might also have important implications in the use of antibiotics in the husbandry of livestock. Adjuvant supplementation with uridine and pyruvate, by boosting the animal immune system especially during metaphylaxis (control) or prophylaxis (prevention) treatments with broad-spectrum and low-cost mitotoxic antibiotics, could help to tackle antimicrobial resistance32.

Finally, our findings contribute to optimizing the use of numerous groups of current antibiotics gaining time for the search and the approval of new molecules to enter the clinical pipeline. Together with a better knowledge of the structure of eukaryotic and prokaryotic ribosomes, supporting a deeper understanding of the interactions of antibiotics that target ribosomes and inhibit protein synthesis33, this may lead to a re-evaluation of old molecules and an improvement of their pharmacological effects, also making them more bacterial target-specific thus further reducing their toxicity.

In conclusion, this work shows that adjuvant supplementation with uridine and pyruvate protects the proliferative capacity of T lymphocytes, effector cells of cell-mediated immunity, from mitotoxic antibiotics. Our results lay the groundwork for a “renaissance” of forgotten antibiotic molecules and for improving antibiotic medicine in terms of anti-microbial efficacy, administration protocols, and clinical application potentials. This may be an important step forward in the antibiotic resistance era.

Methods

Study participants

A population of subjects scheduled to undergo endourological maneuvers, prostate biopsy, or medically-assisted reproduction was selected in the Urology, Andrology, and Kidney Transplantation Units of the University of Bari. Among them, we enrolled those with asymptomatic bacteriuria or with positive sperm culture requiring antibiotic treatment according to EAU guidelines17–19,34,35. The population did not include patients with acute and/or life-threatening diseases like a renal and hepatic failure, nor patients with infections, acute stress, or those in treatment with medications affecting the number of leukocytes (i.e. corticosteroids). Other exclusion criteria were: infections sustained by Multi-Drug Resistant (MDR), Xtreme Drug-Resistant (XDR), Pan Drug-Resistant (PDR) microbes; chronic systemic inflammatory diseases; neoplastic diseases of recent onset (less than 10 years) and/or under chemotherapeutic treatment; immune-depression conditions; pregnant and/or puerperal women; allergy and/or adverse reactions to the prescribed drug or its excipient. The study was conducted in compliance with the Helsinki Declaration and was approved and registered (registration number: 5251) by the Ethical Committee of the Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Policlinico di Bari, Italy, officially accredited to the Italian Medicines Agency (AIFA). Between July 2017 and December 2019, 59-sequential eligible patients were recruited and after obtaining informed consent, 55 were finally enrolled in the trial. All the selected subjects belonged to Caucasian ethnicity and were predominantly men (85.18% of controls and 75% of the group treated with Uripyr, Mitobiotix, Italy). The mean age of patients of the Uripyr group was 58.32 ± 16.12 years vs. the 53.78 ± 16.73 of controls, meanwhile the BMI was similar in the two groups (25.46 ± 2.86 Uripyr group vs. 25.81 ± 3.30 of controls). The percentages of chronic comorbidities and nephrological diseases did not differ considerably in the two experimental groups. The primary endpoint of the present study was the analysis of the effects of oral supplementation with Uripyr during treatment with mitotoxic antibiotics on hemogram evaluations; the second endpoint was the exvivo investigation of immune cell functional properties within the same cohort of patients.

Hemogram analysis

The enrolled patients underwent a complete blood count, urinalysis, and urine and/or semen culture (according to the clinical judgment) at baseline (T0), before starting any antibiotic treatment. Demographic and clinical data were also collected at this time. Then, participants were randomly allocated to the “Antibiotic treatment plus Uripyr” (Uripyr) group or “Antibiotic treatment without Uripyr” (control) group. The randomization process and subsequent assignment to the intervention group were managed by an independent pharmacological consultant. Figure 1 shows a flow diagram of the population selection process. Patients in the Uripyr group were instructed to take three doses of Uripyr (each containing 150 mg of uridine and 2 g of pyruvate) per day, one hour before taking the antibiotic. Each subject was treated with a single antibiotic according to the culture test susceptibility results and the duration and dosage described by the best-accepted guidelines17,18,35. The mitotoxic antibiotics were administered at the following doses: levofloxacin 500 mg qd (7–10 days), ciprofloxacin 500 mg bid (7–10 days), tigecycline 50 mg bid (for 7 days), doxycycline 100 mg bid for the first day and then qd (7–10 days), linezolid 600 mg bid (10 days), erythromycin 1 g bid (10 days). Finally, at the end of the antibiotic therapy, each patient repeated the same clinical evaluations as at baseline (defined as TEND values). In addition, proinflammatory markers such as CRP (C-reactive protein) were available in most of the patients. Adverse effects, if any, were recorded. The use of any other phytotherapeutic agents for genital and urinary symptoms (e.g. Serenoa repens36) was also checked.

Proliferation test of CD3+ cells

Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) were freshly isolated from venous blood drawn into BD Vacutainer Heparin Tubes using Ficoll Paque Plus (GE Healthcare, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. PBMCs were collected after the antibiotic treatment (TEND) with or without the Uripyr supplementation. PBMCs isolated from each patient were washed in sterile PBS 1X (Euroclone) and stained with CellTrace CFSE (Thermo Fisher Scientific, MA, USA) for 5 min at 37 °C (1 μL/ml PBS1X). CFSE staining was stopped by diluting cells with five volumes of BSA1%-PBS1X (Bovine Serum Albumin, Sigma-Aldrich, USA) for 5 min at room temperature. Stained PBMCs from each patient were washed again in PBS1X and plated in 100% of autologous heat-inactivated serum for 30 min at 37 °C, adjusting cell density to 1 × 106 cells/ml in 48 wells. After seeding, cells were stimulated with 10 μL of TransAct (Miltenyi Biotec, Bergisch Gladbach, Germany) according to the manufacturer’s instructions and maintained at 37 °C in a humidified atmosphere of CO2/air (5:95). After 72–96 h of culture, cells were collected, washed in PBS1X, and stained for 20 min with 1:20 diluted anti-CD3 antibody (CD3-PE-Vio 770, human, REA613 Clone—Miltenyi Biotec, Bergisch Gladbach, Germany). Cytofluorimetric analysis was carried out in a blind setup by two different groups using the FC500 Flow cytometer (Beckman Coulter, CA, USA) and the FACSCanto II (Becton, Dickinson and Company, OR, USA), respectively. Data analysis was performed using FlowJo software, version 10.6.1 (Becton, Dickinson and Company, OR, USA). Gating strategy: forward scatter vs. side scatter for PBMCs gating. Gated PBMCs were checked for positivity to CD3 (forward scatter vs. CD3). CD3+ gated cells were analyzed for CFSE staining by histogram to test their proliferating ability. The percentage of dividing cells from each population was calculated as a delta of the mean percentages of TransAct stimulated versus unstimulated cells (antibiotic treatment ± Uripyr).

Statistical methods

The clinical study was conducted with a 1:1 randomization according to the extension of the CONSORT Statement to randomized plot and feasibility trials37. Statistical analyses were performed using the R statistical environment, packages “stats”, “car”, “gmodels”, “fBasics” and “pwr”. We performed a sample size calculation with a medium (0.5) and large (0.8) effect size, 80% power and two-sided 5% significance, yielding trial sample sizes of 64 and 26 subjects for each treatment arm, respectively. These evaluations may be useful for a future randomized control trial. Shapiro–Wilk tests and graphic evaluations of each variable were performed to test for normal distribution. All the quantitative variables were considered as normally distributed, except for differential values of white blood cells and lymphocytes. Descriptive statistics are presented as mean ± standard deviation and/or median and [IQR], for normally distributed and non-normally distributed continuous variables, respectively, whereas categorical variables are indicated as frequency (%). Then, two-sided Student t-test and Mann–Whitney’s U test, as appropriate, were performed to assess comparisons among the two groups. Differences in categorical variables between groups were assessed by the Pearson χ2 test. Plots and graphs were drawn up using the R package “graph” and “ggplot2” for the in vivo study and the GraphPad Prism statistical software release 6.01 for the ex vivo study. For the ex vivo analysis, the unpaired student t-test was used; data are expressed as mean ± SEM. A level of significance of p < 0.05 was used to compare the two groups.

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Information. (296KB, pdf)

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Dr. Emanuele Loiacono for helpful discussion, for setting up the production of Uripyr at Mitobiotix and for kindly providing Uripyr throughout the study. The authors also thank Dr. Giuseppe Castellano and Dr. Marcello Chieppa for helpful discussions and Dr. Davide Parisi and Dr. Luca Scalone for the their support in patients data management.

Author contributions

Conceptualization and design of the project: M.B. and G.V; validation and formal analysis: I.S., S.B., S.D.S, M.R.; laboratory investigation: F.S., A.P., M.A.F., A.V., M.R.; writing: S.B., S.D.S, P.S., M.B. and G.V.; supervision: A.M., P.S., M.B. and G.V.; patients' recruitment and enrollment: S.B., M.B.; Project Administration: M.B. and G.V.

Competing interests

M.B. and G.V. declare that patents on the effects of uridine and pyruvate on immune cells are pending. The other authors declare no competing interests.

Footnotes

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

These authors contributed equally: Stefano Battaglia and Stefania De Santis.

Contributor Information

Michele Battaglia, Email: michele.battaglia@uniba.it.

Gaetano Villani, Email: gaetano.villani@uniba.it.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1038/s41598-021-91559-8.

References

  • 1.Ritts RE. Antibiotics as biological response modifiers. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 1990;26(Suppl C):31–36. doi: 10.1093/jac/26.suppl_C.31. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Slama TG, et al. A clinician's guide to the appropriate and accurate use of antibiotics: The Council for Appropriate and Rational Antibiotic Therapy (CARAT) criteria. Am. J. Med. 2005;118(Suppl 7A):1S–6S. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2005.05.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Singh R, Sripada L, Singh R. Side effects of antibiotics during bacterial infection: Mitochondria, the main target in host cell. Mitochondrion. 2014;16:50–54. doi: 10.1016/j.mito.2013.10.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.King MP, Attardi G. Human cells lacking mtDNA: Repopulation with exogenous mitochondria by complementation. Science. 1989;246:500–503. doi: 10.1126/science.2814477. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Birsoy K, et al. An essential role of the mitochondrial electron transport chain in cell proliferation is to enable aspartate synthesis. Cell. 2015;162:540–551. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2015.07.016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Loffler, M., Carrey, E.A. & Knecht, W. The pathway to pyrimidines: The essential focus on dihydroorotate dehydrogenase, the mitochondrial enzyme coupled to the respiratory chain. Nucleosides Nucleotides Nucl. Acids.39, 1281-1305 (2020). [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 7.Hangas A, et al. Ciprofloxacin impairs mitochondrial DNA replication initiation through inhibition of Topoisomerase 2. Nucleic Acids Res. 2018;46:9625–9636. doi: 10.1093/nar/gky793. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Labro MT. Interference of antibacterial agents with phagocyte functions: Immunomodulation or "immuno-fairy tales"? Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2000;13:615–650. doi: 10.1128/cmr.13.4.615-650.2000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Hauser WE, Jr, Remington JS. Effect of antibiotics on the immune response. Am. J. Med. 1982;72:711–716. doi: 10.1016/0002-9343(82)90534-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Maker JH, Stroup CM, Huang V, James SF. Antibiotic hypersensitivity mechanisms. Pharmacy. 2019;7:122. doi: 10.3390/pharmacy7030122. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Pearce EL, Poffenberger MC, Chang CH, Jones RG. Fueling immunity: Insights into metabolism and lymphocyte function. Science. 2013;342:1242454. doi: 10.1126/science.1242454. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.West AP, Shadel GS, Ghosh S. Mitochondria in innate immune responses. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2011;11:389–402. doi: 10.1038/nri2975. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Walker MA, Volpi S, Sims KB, Walter JE, Traggiai E. Powering the immune system: Mitochondria in immune function and deficiency. J. Immunol. Res. 2014;2014:164309. doi: 10.1155/2014/164309. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Kapnick SM, Pacheco SE, McGuire PJ. The emerging role of immune dysfunction in mitochondrial diseases as a paradigm for understanding immunometabolism. Metab. Clin. Exp. 2018;81:97–112. doi: 10.1016/j.metabol.2017.11.010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Garrabou, G. et al. Influence of mitochondrial genetics on the mitochondrial toxicity of linezolid in blood cells and skin nerve fibers. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.61(9):e00542-17. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00542-17 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 16.Yang JH, et al. Antibiotic-induced changes to the host metabolic environment inhibit drug efficacy and alter immune function. Cell Host Microbe. 2017;22:757–765.e753. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2017.10.020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Naber KG, et al. EAU guidelines for the management of urinary and male genital tract infections. Urinary Tract Infection (UTI) Working Group of the Health Care Office (HCO) of the European Association of Urology (EAU) Eur. Urol. 2001;40:576–588. doi: 10.1159/000049840. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Foxman B. Urinary tract infection syndromes: Occurrence, recurrence, bacteriology, risk factors, and disease burden. Infect. Dis. Clin. N. Am. 2014;28:1–13. doi: 10.1016/j.idc.2013.09.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Cai T, Koves B, Johansen TE. Asymptomatic bacteriuria, to screen or not to screen—and when to treat? Curr. Opin. Urol. 2017;27:107–111. doi: 10.1097/MOU.0000000000000368. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Froebel KS, et al. Standardisation and quality assurance of lymphocyte proliferation assays for use in the assessment of immune function. European concerted action on immunological and virological markers of HIV disease progression. J. Immunol. Methods. 1999;227:85–97. doi: 10.1016/S0022-1759(99)00082-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Marchant J. When antibiotics turn toxic. Nature. 2018;555:431–433. doi: 10.1038/d41586-018-03267-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Breda CNS, Davanzo GG, Basso PJ, Saraiva Camara NO, Moraes-Vieira PMM. Mitochondria as central hub of the immune system. Redox Biol. 2019;26:101255. doi: 10.1016/j.redox.2019.101255. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Mills EL, Kelly B, O'Neill LAJ. Mitochondria are the powerhouses of immunity. Nat. Immunol. 2017;18:488–498. doi: 10.1038/ni.3704. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Chaplin DD. Overview of the immune response. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2010;125:S3–23. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2009.12.980. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Desdin-Mico G, Soto-Heredero G, Mittelbrunn M. Mitochondrial activity in T cells. Mitochondrion. 2018;41:51–57. doi: 10.1016/j.mito.2017.10.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Angajala A, et al. Diverse roles of mitochondria in immune responses: Novel insights into immuno-metabolism. Front. Immunol. 2018;9:1605. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2018.01605. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Tarasenko TN, et al. Cytochrome c oxidase activity is a metabolic checkpoint that regulates cell fate decisions during T cell activation and differentiation. Cell Metab. 2017;25:1254–1268.e1257. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2017.05.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.McGuire PJ. Mitochondrial dysfunction and the aging immune system. Biology. 2019;8:26. doi: 10.3390/biology8020026. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Willyard C. How anti-ageing drugs could boost COVID vaccines in older people. Nature. 2020;586:352–354. doi: 10.1038/d41586-020-02856-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Connolly GP, Duley JA. Uridine and its nucleotides: Biological actions, therapeutic potentials. Trends Pharmacol. Sci. 1999;20:218–225. doi: 10.1016/S0165-6147(99)01298-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Yu X, et al. Fluoroquinolone use and the risk of collagen-associated adverse events: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Drug Saf. 2019;42:1025–1033. doi: 10.1007/s40264-019-00828-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Tang KL, et al. Restricting the use of antibiotics in food-producing animals and its associations with antibiotic resistance in food-producing animals and human beings: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet. Planet. Health. 2017;1:e316–e327. doi: 10.1016/S2542-5196(17)30141-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Arenz S, Wilson DN. Blast from the past: Reassessing forgotten translation inhibitors, antibiotic selectivity, and resistance mechanisms to aid drug development. Mol. Cell. 2016;61:3–14. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2015.10.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Blango MG, Mulvey MA. Persistence of uropathogenic Escherichia coli in the face of multiple antibiotics. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2010;54:1855–1863. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00014-10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Gupta K, et al. International clinical practice guidelines for the treatment of acute uncomplicated cystitis and pyelonephritis in women: A 2010 update by the Infectious Diseases Society of America and the European Society for Microbiology and Infectious Diseases. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2011;52:e103–120. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciq257. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Tacklind J, Macdonald R, Rutks I, Stanke JU, Wilt TJ. Serenoa repens for benign prostatic hyperplasia. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2012;12:CD001423. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001423.pub3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Eldridge SM, et al. CONSORT 2010 statement: Extension to randomised pilot and feasibility trials. Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2016;2:64. doi: 10.1186/s40814-016-0105-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.R Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, 2020) https://www.R-project.org/.

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Information. (296KB, pdf)

Articles from Scientific Reports are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES