Doxorubicin Delivered via ApoE-Directed Reduction-Sensitive Polymersomes Potently Inhibit Orthotopic Human Glioblastoma Xenografts in Nude Mice

Abstract

Purpose

Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) poorly responds to chemotherapy owing to the existence of blood-brain barriers (BBB). It has been a long desire to develop BBB-permeable vehicles to facilitate drug targeting to GBM.

Method and Results

Here, we report that doxorubicin hydrochloride loaded in ApoE peptide-functionalized reduction-sensitive polymersomes (ApoE-PS-DOX) induces potent therapy of orthotopic U-87 MG model in nude mice. ApoE-PS-DOX with varying amount of ApoE (10~30 mol%) all had stable DOX loading and small sizes (< 90 nm). As revealed by flow cytometry, confocal microscopy, apoptosis and MTT assays, ApoE-PS-DOX with 20 mol.% ApoE induced the best cellular uptake and inhibitory effect to U-87 MG cells, which were much better than the non-targeted PS-DOX and liposomal doxorubicin (Lipo-DOX) used in the clinic. ApoE-PS-DOX revealed a pharmacokinetic profile comparable to PS-DOX but induced considerably better growth inhibition of orthotopically xenografted U-87 MG tumors in nude mice than PS-DOX and Lipo-DOX, leading to significant survival benefits with a median survival time of 44 days, which was almost doubled relative to the phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) group. Moreover, in contrast to mice treated with Lipo-DOX and PS-DOX, ApoE-PS-DOX group exhibited little body weight loss, signifying that ApoE-PS-DOX not only has low side effects but also can effectively inhibit glioblastoma invasion.

Conclusion

This ApoE-docked multifunctional polymersomal doxorubicin induces potent and safe chemotherapy of orthotopic U-87 MG model in nude mice offering an alternative treatment modality for GBM.

Introduction

Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM), a leading primary brain malignancy, is hard to treat with chemotherapy owing to the existence of blood-brain barrier (BBB).^1–3 Temozolomide (TMZ) is a unique drug capable of crossing BBB and currently used for treating GBM patients.^4,5 However, more than half of patients with recurrent anaplastic gliomas could not benefit from TMZ treatment, and approximately 20% patients treated with TMZ suffer from the side effect such as thrombocytopenia and neutropenia,⁶ and the repeated administration of TMZ often induces drug resistance.^7,8 Thus, design and development of novel chemotherapy become an emergent mission for GBM treatment.

BBB-permeable nanovehicles provide an intriguing platform to facilitate drug targeting to GBM. Various nanodrugs have been designed and constructed for GBM treatment.^9–13 Interestingly, brain capillary endothelial cells were found to overexpress several receptors including transferrin receptor, lactoferrin receptor, and low-density lipoprotein receptor-related protein 1 (LRP1), which could be utilized to enhance the BBB crossing and brain delivery.^14–17 For example, transferrin-drug conjugates, transferrin-modified liposomes and nanoparticles have been constructed for enhanced delivery of varying chemical drugs like doxorubicin (DOX) and resveratrol to treat GBM,^18–22 inducing reduced tumor size and prolonged survival time in intracranial U87 glioma xenografted mice. Apolipoprotein E-installed nanoparticles have been used to assist liposomes and lipid nanoparticles to cross BBB.^23,24 It should be noted, however, that chemical conjugation with large proteins to nanomedicines can be a great challenge.²⁵ Moreover, conflicting results have been reported on transferrin-mediated brain targeting.²⁶ Peptides such as T7, T12, iRGD, and angiopep-2 with small molecule weight, simple structure and specific target moieties have appeared to be a superior alternative for GBM targeting.^27–32 Angiopep-2 demonstrated not only BBB permeability but also high affinity to GBM.^33–35 Very recently, we found that apolipoprotein E derived peptide, ApoE, exhibited better transcytosis and glioblastoma accumulation than angiopep-2,^36,37 which is likely a result of its multi-receptor-targeting property.

Here, we report for the first time that DOX loaded in ApoE peptide-functionalized reduction-sensitive polymersomes (ApoE-PS-DOX) induces potent therapy of orthotopic U-87 MG model in nude mice (Scheme 1). ApoE-PS-DOX was easily prepared from poly(ethylene glycol)-b-poly(trimethylene carbonate-co-dithiolane trimethylene carbonate) (PEG-P(TMC-DTC)) and ApoE-docked PEG-P(TMC-DTC). Our previous work showed that PS-DOX possess superior physiochemical properties to clinically used liposomal doxorubicin (Lipo-DOX), in terms of stability, tolerability, and intracellular drug release.³⁸ The disulfide-crosslinked membrane of ApoE-PS-DOX would afford minor drug leakage during circulation and swift drug release in the cytoplasm of tumor cells that possesses 2–3 orders magnitude higher glutathione concentrations.^39,40 PS-DOX has been engineered with varying ligands such as cRGD, GE11, ATN-161, and angiopep-2 for targeted treatment of different solid tumors.^35,41–43 Our results showed that ApoE-PS-DOX induced significantly better growth inhibition of orthotopically xenografted U-87 MG tumors than PS-DOX and Lipo-DOX, leading to significant survival benefits with a median survival time of 44 days. Moreover, mice following the treatment with ApoE-PS-DOX exhibited little body weight loss, signifying that ApoE-PS-DOX not only has low side effects but also can effectively inhibit glioblastoma invasion.

Scheme 1.

Illustration of doxorubicin-loaded ApoE peptide-functionalized reduction-sensitive polymersomes (ApoE-PS-DOX) for the delivery of DOX to orthotopic human U-87 glioblastoma xenografts in nude mice. ApoE-PS-DOX engineered with ApoE can boost its BBB penetration and cellular uptake via LRP-1-mediated mechanism. The reduction-triggered DOX release from ApoE-PS-DOX affords significant growth suppression of orthotopically xenografted U-87 MG tumors, leading to remarkable survival benefits.

Experimental Section

Loading and Reduction-Triggered Release of DOX·HCl

ApoE-PS was prepared through the self-assembly of PEG-P(TMC-DTC) and ApoE-PEG-P(TMC-DTC) with different molar ratios (10 mol.%, 20 mol.%, and 30 mol.%) via solvent exchange method, and the corresponding polymersomes were defined as ApoE10-PS, ApoE20-PS, and ApoE30-PS. The non-targeted PS was formed from PEG-P(TMC-DTC) only. pH-gradient method was used for DOX·HCl encapsulation. In short, PEG-P(TMC-DTC) and ApoE-PEG-P(TMC-DTC) with different molar ratios were completely dissolved in DMF to form a mixture with a polymer concentration of 10.0 mg/mL. 100 μL of the above mixture was added to 900 μL of citrate buffer (10 mM, pH 4), and the mixed solution was placed at 37 °C for 1 h followed by adjusting the pH to 7.8 using Na₂HPO₄ (2.0 M). After adding predetermined amount of DOX·HCl solution (5.0 mg/mL), the obtained solution was stewed at 37 °C overnight, and then exhaustingly dialyzed against phosphate buffer (PB, 10 mM, pH 7.4). The whole experiment process needs to be protected from light. In order to figure out the drug loading capacity (DLC) and drug loading efficiency (DLE), the drug-loaded vehicles were freeze-dried and dissolved in DMF to extract DOX·HCl. The amount of DOX·HCl was measured by fluorescence analysis (ex.480 nm, em. 560nm), and the DLC and DLE were calculated as reported previously.³⁸

Cell Apoptosis Analysis

U-87 MG human GBM cells with luciferase transfection gene were purchased from Shanghai Sinochrome (China). Approximately 1.0–1.5×10⁵ cells per well were seeded in six-well plates for overnight, and incubated with DOX·HCl, Lipo-DOX, PS-DOX, or ApoE-PS-DOX (DOX·HCl concentration: 5.0 μg/mL) for 4 h. The cells were further incubated with fresh media for 44 h for Annexin V-FITC/7-AAD assay. In short, the collected cells following complete washing were suspended in 200 μL of binding buffer, incubated with 7-AAD and Annexin V-FITC for 15 mins at room temperature, and examined using flow cytometric analysis. The experiments have been repeated three times and the data were presented as mean ± SD (n = 3).

Cell Invasion Analysis

Approximately 1.5×10⁵ U-87 MG cells/well were plated in six-well plates overnight, treated with Lipo-DOX, PS-DOX, or ApoE-PS-DOX (DOX concentration: 0.5 μg/mL) for 4 h, and then digested. The collected cells following suspension in 100 μL of Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle’s Medium (DMEM) supplemented with 1.0% FBS medium were added to the upper chamber of a transwell. Prior to adding cells, the upper chamber of the transwell was covered by 30 μg of Matrigel and the lower chamber was filled with 500 μL of medium containing 10% FBS. Following 20 h incubation, the noninvasive cells in the top chamber were wiped with cotton swabs, and those invaded to the lower chamber were stained with 0.1% crystal violet and photographed under a microscope. The experiments have been repeated three times and the data were presented as mean ± SD (n = 3).

In vivo Antitumor Efficacy

The study was approved by Soochow University Laboratory Animal Center and the Animal Care and Use Committee of Soochow University (Guideline: Regulation for the Administration of Affairs Concerning Experimental Animals of Soochow University). Orthotopic glioblastoma xenograft model was built by intracranial transplantation of U-87 MG-luciferase (U-87 MG-Luc) tumor tissue. Briefly, subcutaneous tumor blocks were acquired by injection of U-87 MG-Luc cells (2×10⁶ cells/mouse) to the flank of BALB/c nude mice and cut into small fragments. Then, the tumor fragments were administrated using a 24# trocar into the left skull (2 mm lateral to the bregma and 3 mm depth) of anesthetized BALB/c nude mice.^32,37,44 The tumor growth was monitored by an IVIS Lumina II (λex/λem = 640 nm/668 nm), and the mice were separated into four groups at random (n = 8/group). PBS, ApoE20-PS-DOX, PS-DOX, or Lipo-DOX (5 mg DOX·HCl equiv./kg) was administered via tail vein on day 10, 13, 16, or 19. One day after the last treatment, one mouse from each group was sacrificed to acquire the major organs and tumors for histological analysis. The harvested tissues were fixed with a paraformaldehyde solution (4%) and implanted with paraffin. Then, the sliced tissues were stained by hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) or TUNEL and observed with a microscope (Leica QWin, Germany).

Results and Discussion

Preparation of ApoE-PS-DOX

ApoE-PS was readily self-assembled from PEG-P(TMC-DTC) and ApoE-PEG-P(TMC-DTC) with different molar ratios (10 ~ 30 mol.%) (Figure 1A). Dynamic Light Scattering (DLS) characterization illustrated that the sizes of ApoE-PS were about 80 nm, and the amount of ApoE basically did not affect the size and size distribution (Figure S1A). Taking ApoE20-PS as an example, we investigated the physiochemical properties of ApoE-docked polymersomes. Under the conditions of exhausting dilution, 10% FBS, and one-week storage in PB, ApoE20-PS displayed superb stability with a slight size change (Figure S1B), which mainly benefits from disulfide bond-crossing of DTC moieties in the polymersomal membrane.³⁸ ApoE-PS, however, quickly swelled and exhibited broad distribution in 12 h, and presented largely increased size of over 1300 nm at 24 h in the presence of glutathione (GSH, 10 mM) (Figure S1C), signifying their rapid responsivity under intracellular reduction environment.

Figure 1.

Preparation process and physicochemical properties of PS-DOX and ApoE-PS-DOX. (A) Illustration of preparation process of ApoE-PS-DOX. (B) Size distribution measured using DLS. Inset: Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) image of ApoE20-PS-DOX (bar: 100 nm). (C) Stability of ApoE20-PS-DOX under different conditions. (D) Responsiveness of ApoE20-PS-DOX under 10 mM GSH. (E) GSH-triggered drug release from ApoE20-PS-DOX in PB and PB + 10 mM GSH at 37 °C.

DOX·HCl was actively encapsulated into ApoE20-PS through pH-gradient hydration technique that is used for clinically used Lipo-DOX at present. Both ApoE-PS and PS exhibited decent drug loading capacity with a decent DLC up to 9.3 wt.% (Table 1). In comparison with blank polymersomes, the formed ApoE20-PS-DOX displayed a slightly increased size with an average diameter of 85~89 nm (Figure 1B), comparably narrow distribution, and nearly neutral surface charge (1.5 ~ 1.9 mV) (Table 1). Meanwhile, PS-DOX without ApoE targeting ligand exhibited similar physiochemical properties including size (~80 nm), size distribution, and surface charge (0.5 mV). ApoE20-PS-DOX was robust against dilution, 10% FBS, and PB for 1 week (Figure 1C), while quickly swelled to over 1000 nm within 24 h under reductive environment (10 mM GSH) (Figure 1D). In vitro release studies displayed that ApoE-PS-DOX though possessing a minimal drug release (ca. 21%) in physiological environments within 24 h showed markedly accelerated drug release in PB solution containing 10 mM GSH, in which around 83% of drug was released although other conditions unchanged (Figure 1E). PS-DOX displayed similar drug release profiles. The remarkable features of ApoE-PS-DOX including robustly crosslinked structure, peptide conferred tumor selectivity, and redox-triggered drug release make it different from most developed DOX delivery nanosystems.^45–47

Table 1.

Drug Loading of PS-DOX and ApoE20-PS-DOX

Polymersomes	DLC (wt.%)		DLE (%)a	Size (nm)b	PDIb	Zeta (mV)c
	Theory	Determineda
ApoE20-PS-DOX	10	5.1	48.8	85	0.11	+1.7
	15	7.4	45.6	87	0.14	+1.9
	20	9.3	40.8	89	0.15	+1.5
PS-DOX	10	4.9	46.4	78	0.16	+0.8
	15	6.8	41.2	80	0.12	+0.6
	20	8.5	37.3	83	0.14	+0.5

Notes: ^aMeasured using fluorometry. ^bMeasured using DLS, PDI, The polydispersity index. ^cMeasured using electrophoresis.

In vitro Antitumor Activity and Selective Cellular Uptake of ApoE-PS-DOX

Both PS-DOX and ApoE-PS-DOX showed higher in vitro antitumor efficacy in U-87 MG cells than Lipo-DOX, mainly owing to the efficient cellular uptake and fast drug release from polymersomes under intracellular reductive environments (Figure 2A). Moreover, ApoE-PS-DOX showed stronger cytotoxic effect toward cancer cells in comparison with PS-DOX, in which ApoE20-PS-DOX displayed a lowest half-maximal inhibitory concentration (IC₅₀) of 1.01 μg DOX⋅HCl equiv./mL. PS-DOX and Lipo-DOX revealed IC₅₀ of 3.64 and 10.22 μg DOX⋅HCl equiv./mL, respectively. Noticeably, all empty PS and ApoE-PS (ApoE densities: 10–30 mol.%) were nontoxic toward both cancer cells (U-87 MG, Figure S2A) and healthy cells (astrocyte, Figure S2B) at concentrations of 0.1–0.5 mg/mL.

Figure 2.

In vitro antitumor efficacy and cellular internalization of ApoE-PS-DOX in U-87 MG cells. (A) Cytotoxicity evaluated by MTT assay. Cells treated with varying formulations for 4 h were further incubated in fresh medium for 44 h (n = 4). (B) Flow cytometric analysis and (C) CLSM images of U-87 MG cells incubated with varying formulations for 4 h at a concentration of 10 μg DOX·HCl/mL. Scale bar: 30 μm. ApoE-PS-DOX with a ApoE density of 20% (ApoE20-PS-DOX) demonstrated best cellular internalization and cytotoxic capacity in U-87 MG cells.

In comparison with Lipo-DOX and PS-DOX, ApoE-PS-DOX displayed remarkably higher cellular uptake in U-87 MG cells as measured by flow cytometry (Figure 2B), signifying that the introduction of ApoE facilitated the cellular uptake of nano-drugs via LRP and LDLR receptor-mediated mechanism. Notably, ApoE20-PS-DOX displayed highest DOX fluorescence after incubating with cells for 4 h, presenting 3.6 times higher drug accumulation in U-87 MG cells than Lipo-DOX group. ApoE20-PS-DOX was thus selected for subsequent in vitro/vivo evaluation. The cellular uptake and trafficking was further investigated using confocal laser scanning microscope (CLSM) measurement, and the results revealed that U-87 MG cells incubated with ApoE20-PS-DOX for 4 h displayed strong DOX fluorescence in both cytoplasm and nucleus (Figure 2C), signifying its efficient cellular internalization as well as fast drug release inside cancer cells. In contrast, cells incubated with Lipo-DOX or PS-DOX without targeting ligand presented faint DOX fluorescence that mostly located at perinuclear area.

Cell Apoptosis and Invasion

Cell apoptosis of U-87 MG cells following the treatment with different formulations was evaluated using Annexin V-FITC/7AAD apoptosis detection kit. Notably, both PS-DOX and ApoE10-PS-DOX caused significant apoptosis of U-87 MG cells, in which PS-DOX, ApoE10-PS-DOX, ApoE20-PS-DOX, and ApoE30-PS-DOX at a DOX·HCl concentration of 5 μg/mL displayed remarkable apoptotic rates of 49.9%, 74.6%, 85.3%, and 79.0%, respectively (Figure 3A). The most apoptotic cells generated by ApoE20-PS-DOX corresponds to its highest in vitro cytotoxic capacity towards cancer cells. Western blot assay further revealed that cells treated with ApoE20-PS-DOX had the highest expression of apoptosis-related BAX protein and the lowest expression of anti-apoptosis-associated Bcl-2 protein (Figure 3B).

Figure 3.

Effect of ApoE20-PS-DOX on the apoptosis and invasion glioma cells, Lipo-DOX and PS-DOX were uses as controls. (A) Cell apoptosis assay and (B) Western blot assay of the expression of Bcl-2 and BAX proteins in U-87 MG cells. (C) Effect of different drug on cell invasion. (D) Quantification of cell invasion presented in C. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01.

Vigorously invasive growth of GBM greatly compromises the therapeutic efficacy of surgical excision, radiotherapy and chemotherapy.⁴⁸ Here, transwell assay was employed to evaluate the capacity of nanodrugs on the inhibition of cell invasion. Compare with PBS group, Lipo-DOX, PS-DOX, and ApoE20-PS-DOX showed obvious inhibition of cell invasion (Figure 3C). Interestingly, cells following the treatment with ApoE20-PS-DOX displayed around two times less invasion compared with PS-DOX and Lipo-DOX groups (Figure 3D).

Pharmacokinetics and Biodistribution

Both ApoE-PS-DOX and PS-DOX were observed to have a relatively long circulation time with a t_1/2,β of ca. 4.0 h (Figure 4A), in sharp contrast with that of free DOX (ca. 0.45h⁴⁹), confirming that ApoE-PS-DOX has superior in vivo stability. Comparing with Lipo-DOX, ApoE-PS-DOX achieved nearly 8-fold higher enrichment (ca. 7.2%ID/g) in the U87 glioma tumors (Figure 4B), outperforming previously reported nanodrugs.^11,18,50 This high GBM accumulation of ApoE-PS-DOX is mainly attributed to the prominent BBB-crossing and cell-targeting effect of ApoE. Furthermore, ApoE-PS-DOX revealed less deposition in the liver and heart in comparison with Lipo-DOX, possibly further lessening the cardiotoxicity, a main concern of DOX in the clinics.⁵¹

Figure 4.

Pharmacokinetics and biodistribution studies. (A) Pharmacokinetics study of ApoE20-PS-DOX and PS-DOX in C57BL/6 mice. (B) Biodistribution study of ApoE-PS-DOX, PS-DOX, and Lipo-DOX in orthotopic xenograft mouse model at 8 h post-injection (10 mg DOX·HCl/kg). **p < 0.01.

In vivo Therapeutic Efficacy

The anti-glioma efficacy of ApoE20-PS-DOX was assessed using orthotopic U-87 MG-luciferase (U-87 MG-Luc) tumor-bearing mouse model. The bioluminescent luciferase reporter expressed by U-87 MG cells was employed to visualize the progression of tumors. In comparison with fast tumor growth in PBS group, all DOX formulations (Lipo-DOX, PS-DOX, ApoE20-PS-DOX) could retard tumor growth as characterized by obviously lower bioluminescence intensity of intracranial tumors on days 10, 14, 18 and 22 (Figure 5A). Of note, mice treated with ApoE20-PS-DOX revealed weak tumor bioluminescence during the whole experimental period, signifying its efficient suppression on tumor progression. The bioluminescence quantification of intracranial tumors revealed that mice treated with ApoE20-PS-DOX had the lowest bioluminescence level with about 3.0-fold and 5.6-fold lower luminescence intensity than those treated with PS-DOX and PBS on day 22, respectively (Figure 5B). Moreover, ApoE-PS-DOX group exhibited little body weight loss (Figure 5C), signifying that ApoE-PS-DOX not only has low systemic toxicity but also can efficiently inhibit glioblastoma invasion. On the contrary, both Lipo-DOX and PS-DOX induced comparable body weight loss to PBS group. Remarkably, ApoE20-PS-DOX could significantly extend the survival time of orthotopic U-87 tumor-bearing mice with a median survival time (MST) of 44 days, which was over 2-fold longer than PBS group (23 days) (Figure 5D), confirming its high anti-GBM efficacy. PS-DOX and Lipo-DOX could also increase the MST to 35 and 28 days, respectively, although significantly less efficient than ApoE20-PS-DOX. In comparison, moderate survival benefits (MST = 28 ~ 38 days) were obtained from previous work on DOX and paclitaxel-loaded nanodrugs in orthotopic GBM bearing mice.^12,50,52,53

Figure 5.

Anti-GBM efficacy of ApoE-PS-DOX, PS-DOX, and Lipo-DOX (dosage: 5.0 mg DOX·HCl equiv./kg) in orthotopic U-87 MG-Luc human glioma xenografts. ApoE-PS-DOX group demonstrated best tumor growth inhibition and survival benefits. (A) Bioluminescence images of mice following the administration on day 10, 13, 16, and 19. (B) Average radiance of U-87 MG-Luc bioluminescence in different groups (**p<0.01). (C) Body weight changes of mice within 23 d post-implantation. (D) Survival evaluation of mice. Statistical analysis: ApoE20-PS-DOX vs Lip-DOX and PBS, ** p < 0.01; Lip-DOX vs PS-DOX, ns; PS-DOX vs PBS, ** p < 0.01; Lip-DOX vs PBS, ** p<0.01 (Kaplan−Meier analysis, Log rank test).

Terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase dUTP nick end labeling (TUNEL) assays revealed that mice received the ApoE20-PS-DOX therapy induced considerable apoptosis (green) of intracranial glioblastoma cells, in sharp contrast with a few apoptotic tumor cells in both PS-DOX and Lipo-DOX groups (Figure 6A). Immunofluorescence staining was used to detect DOX distribution in intracranial tumors after treatment. Mice received the ApoE20-PS-DOX therapy displayed significant DOX fluorescence throughout the whole tumor tissue (Figure 6B), corroborating that ApoE20-PS-DOX facilitates the drug enrichment and retention in intracranial GBM tumors. On the contrary, only a small amount of DOX was perceived in the intracranial tumors of mice received the PS-DOX or Lipo-DOX therapy.

Figure 6.

(A) Tunel analysis of brain tumor excised from mice received the therapy of ApoE20-PS-DOX, PS-DOX, Lipo-DOX and PBS. Green represents apoptotic area in tumor. Bar: 50 μm. (B) Tumor enrichment behavior of ApoE20-PS-DOX, PS-DOX and Lipo-DOX observed by CLSM. Tumor sections are obtained from GBM-bearing mice following 24 h treatment. Nuclei were stained with blue DAPI and DOX with red fluorescence. Bar: 50 μm.

Conclusions

We have demonstrated that DOX loaded in ApoE peptide-functionalized reduction-sensitive polymersomes (ApoE-PS-DOX) induces potent and safe chemotherapy of orthotopic U-87 MG model in nude mice. ApoE-PS-DOX presents several traits including stable drug loading, small size, BBB permeability, GBM cell selectivity, and triggered drug release, giving rise to an extended circulation time and remarkably enhanced drug enrichment in the orthotopical U-87 MG tumor xenografts. Accordingly, ApoE-PS-DOX brought about significant survival benefits (median survival time doubled compared with PBS control) and reduced systemic side effects. ApoE-directed delivery of DOX appears to be an intriguing modality for the treatment of intractable GBM.

Disclosure

The authors report no conflicts of interest in this work.