Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Medline Book to support NIHPA logoLink to Medline Book to support NIHPA
. 2021 Jun;25(36):1–106. doi: 10.3310/hta25360

Nutritional management in newborn babies receiving therapeutic hypothermia: two retrospective observational studies using propensity score matching.

Chris Gale, Dusha Jeyakumaran, Cheryl Battersby, Kayleigh Ougham, Shalini Ojha, Lucy Culshaw, Ella Selby, Jon Dorling, Nicholas Longford
PMCID: PMC8215569  PMID: 34096500

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Therapeutic hypothermia is standard of care for babies with moderate to severe hypoxic-ischaemic encephalopathy. There is limited evidence to inform provision of nutrition during hypothermia.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the association during therapeutic hypothermia between (1) enteral feeding and outcomes, such as necrotising enterocolitis and (2) parenteral nutrition and outcomes, such as late-onset bloodstream infection.

DESIGN

A retrospective cohort study using data held in the National Neonatal Research Database and applying propensity score methodology to form matched groups for analysis.

SETTING

NHS neonatal units in England, Wales and Scotland.

PARTICIPANTS

Babies born at ≥ 36 gestational weeks between 1 January 2010 and 31 December 2017 who received therapeutic hypothermia for 72 hours or who died during treatment.

INTERVENTIONS

Enteral feeding analysis - babies who were enterally fed during therapeutic hypothermia (intervention) compared with babies who received no enteral feeds during therapeutic hypothermia (control). Parenteral nutrition analysis - babies who received parenteral nutrition during therapeutic hypothermia (intervention) compared with babies who received no parenteral nutrition during therapeutic hypothermia (control).

OUTCOME MEASURES

Primary outcomes were severe and pragmatically defined necrotising enterocolitis (enteral feeding analysis) and late-onset bloodstream infection (parenteral nutrition analysis). Secondary outcomes were survival at neonatal discharge, length of neonatal stay, breastfeeding at discharge, onset of breastfeeding, time to first maternal breast milk, hypoglycaemia, number of days with a central line in situ, duration of parenteral nutrition, time to full enteral feeds and growth.

RESULTS

A total of 6030 babies received therapeutic hypothermia. Thirty-one per cent of babies received enteral feeds and 25% received parenteral nutrition. Seven babies (0.1%) were diagnosed with severe necrotising enterocolitis, and further comparative analyses were not conducted on this outcome. A total of 3236 babies were included in the matched enteral feeding analysis. Pragmatically defined necrotising enterocolitis was rare in both groups (0.5% vs. 1.1%) and was lower in babies who were fed during hypothermia (rate difference -0.5%, 95% confidence interval -1.0% to -0.1%; p = 0.03). Higher survival to discharge (96.0% vs. 90.8%, rate difference 5.2%, 95% confidence interval 3.9% to 6.6%; p < 0.001) and higher breastfeeding at discharge (54.6% vs. 46.7%, rate difference 8.0%, 95% confidence interval 5.1% to 10.8%; p < 0.001) rates were observed in enterally fed babies who also had a shorter neonatal stay (mean difference -2.2 days, 95% confidence interval -3.0 to -1.2 days). A total of 2480 babies were included in the matched parenteral nutrition analysis. Higher levels of late-onset bloodstream infection were seen in babies who received parenteral nutrition (0.3% vs. 0.9%, rate difference 0.6%, 95% confidence interval 0.1% to 1.2%; p = 0.03). Survival was lower in babies who did not receive parenteral nutrition (90.0% vs. 93.1%, rate difference 3.1%, 95% confidence interval 1.5% to 4.7%; p < 0.001).

LIMITATIONS

Propensity score methodology can address imbalances in observed confounders only. Residual confounding by unmeasured or poorly recorded variables cannot be ruled out. We did not analyse by type or volume of enteral or parenteral nutrition.

CONCLUSIONS

Necrotising enterocolitis is rare in babies receiving therapeutic hypothermia, and the introduction of enteral feeding is associated with a lower risk of pragmatically defined necrotising enterocolitis and other beneficial outcomes, including rates of higher survival and breastfeeding at discharge. Receipt of parenteral nutrition during therapeutic hypothermia is associated with a higher rate of late-onset infection but lower mortality. These results support introduction of enteral feeding during therapeutic hypothermia.

FUTURE WORK

Randomised trials to assess parenteral nutrition during therapeutic hypothermia.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN474042962.

FUNDING

This project was funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment programme and will be published in full in Health Technology Assessment; Vol. 25, No. 36. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information.

Plain language summary

Every year, approximately 1200 babies in the UK suffer a lack of oxygen to the brain around birth. This is called hypoxic–ischaemic encephalopathy and can lead to brain injury or death. To treat hypoxic–ischaemic encephalopathy, babies receive cooling treatment in which their body temperature is lowered. Doctors do not know the best way to give nutrition to babies receiving cooling treatment. Babies can either be fed milk into their stomach (enteral nutrition) or be given nutrients through their veins (parenteral nutrition). We compared babies who were fed milk while they were being cooled with babies from whom milk was withheld while they were being cooled to see if there was a difference in the frequency of necrotising enterocolitis, a severe gut disease. In addition, we compared babies who received parenteral nutrition while they were being cooled with babies who did not to see if there was a difference in infections. Finally, we looked at other outcomes, including survival and breastfeeding. We used the National Neonatal Research Database, which holds de-identified (i.e. no baby can be identified) information on all babies who have received NHS neonatal care. We used a statistical approach to match babies in each group (i.e. fed babies and not fed babies) as closely as possible so that any difference in outcomes was because of different nutrition and not because of other differences. We included > 6000 babies with hypoxic–ischaemic encephalopathy. Approximately one in three babies received milk feeds and one in four babies received parenteral nutrition during cooling. Necrotising enterocolitis was very rare. More babies who were fed milk during cooling had good outcomes (e.g. being breastfed at discharge) and fewer had necrotising enterocolitis. Most of these babies received only a small amount of milk in the first 3 days. More babies given parenteral nutrition had infections, but also more survived. This suggests that it is probably safe and may be beneficial to feed babies milk during cooling. More research should look at milk feeding and parenteral nutrition during cooling.

Full text of this article can be found in Bookshelf.

References

  1. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE). Therapeutic Hypothermia with Intracorporeal Temperature Monitoring for Hypoxic Perinatal Brain Injury – Interventional Procedures Guidance. London: NICE; 2010.
  2. Jacobs SE, Berg M, Hunt R, Tarnow-Mordi WO, Inder TE, Davis PG. Cooling for newborns with hypoxic–ischaemic encephalopathy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2013;1:CD003311. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD003311.pub3 doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003311.pub3. [DOI]
  3. Hazeldine B, Thyagarajan B, Grant M, Chakkarapani E. Survey of nutritional practices during therapeutic hypothermia for hypoxic–ischaemic encephalopathy. BMJ Paediatr Open 2017;1:e000022. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjpo-2017-000022 doi: 10.1136/bmjpo-2017-000022. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  4. Chang LL, Wynn JL, Pacella MJ, Rossignol CC, Banadera F, Alviedo N, et al. Enteral feeding as an adjunct to hypothermia in neonates with hypoxic–ischemic encephalopathy. Neonatology 2018;113:347–52. https://doi.org/10.1159/000487848 doi: 10.1159/000487848. [DOI] [PubMed]
  5. Thyagarajan B, Tillqvist E, Baral V, Hallberg B, Vollmer B, Blennow M. Minimal enteral nutrition during neonatal hypothermia treatment for perinatal hypoxic–ischaemic encephalopathy is safe and feasible. Acta Paediatr 2015;104:146–51. https://doi.org/10.1111/apa.12838 doi: 10.1111/apa.12838. [DOI] [PubMed]
  6. Allen G, Babarao S, Murphy A, Derwas E. PO-0581 Nutrition during therapeutic hypothermia in neonates. Arch Dis Child 2014;99:A441–2. https://doi.org/10.1136/archdischild-2014-307384.1223 doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2014-307384.1223. [DOI]
  7. Eicher DJ, Wagner CL, Katikaneni LP, Hulsey TC, Bass WT, Kaufman DA, et al. Moderate hypothermia in neonatal encephalopathy: safety outcomes. Pediatr Neurol 2005;32:18–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pediatrneurol.2004.06.015 doi: 10.1016/j.pediatrneurol.2004.06.015. [DOI] [PubMed]
  8. Azzopardi DV, Strohm B, Edwards D, Dyet L, Halliday HL, Juszczak E, et al. Moderate hypothermia to treat perinatal asphyxial encephalopathy. N Engl J Med 2009;361:1349–58. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa0900854 doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0900854. [DOI] [PubMed]
  9. Jacobs SE, Morley CJ, Inder TE, Stewart MJ, Smith KR, McNamara PJ, et al. Whole-body hypothermia for term and near-term newborns with hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy: a randomized controlled trial. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 2011;165:692–700. https://doi.org/10.1001/archpediatrics.2011.43 doi: 10.1001/archpediatrics.2011.43. [DOI] [PubMed]
  10. Morgan J, Young L, McGuire W. Delayed introduction of progressive enteral feeds to prevent necrotising enterocolitis in very low birth weight infants. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2014;12:CD001970. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD001970.pub5 doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001970.pub5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  11. Leaf A, Dorling J, Kempley S, McCormick K, Mannix P, Linsell L, et al. Early or delayed enteral feeding for preterm growth-restricted infants: a randomized trial. Pediatrics 2012;129:e1260–8. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2011-2379 doi: 10.1542/peds.2011-2379. [DOI] [PubMed]
  12. Ip S, Chung M, Raman G, Chew P, Magula N, DeVine D, et al. Breastfeeding and maternal and infant health outcomes in developed countries. Evid Rep Technol Assess 2007;153:1–186. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  13. Hassell KJ, Ezzati M, Alonso-Alconada D, Hausenloy DJ, Robertson NJ. New horizons for newborn brain protection: enhancing endogenous neuroprotection. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2015;100:F541–52. https://doi.org/10.1136/archdischild-2014-306284 doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2014-306284. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  14. Kimkool P, Duckworth EC, Ollerenshaw RH, King K, Beardsall K. PC.34 Current practice regarding feeding/nutrition in babies being cooled for HIE in the UK. Arch Dis Child 2014;99:A47. https://doi.org/10.1136/archdischild-2014-306576.135 doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2014-306576.135. [DOI]
  15. Fivez T, Kerklaan D, Mesotten D, Verbruggen S, Wouters PJ, Vanhorebeek I, et al. Early versus late parenteral nutrition in critically ill children. N Engl J Med 2016;374:1111–22. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1514762 doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1514762. [DOI] [PubMed]
  16. Casaer MP, Mesotten D, Hermans G, Wouters PJ, Schetz M, Meyfroidt G, et al. Early versus late parenteral nutrition in critically ill adults. N Engl J Med 2011;365:506–17. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1102662 doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1102662. [DOI] [PubMed]
  17. Walter E, Liu FX, Maton P, Storme T, Perrinet M, von Delft O, et al. Cost analysis of neonatal and pediatric parenteral nutrition in Europe: a multi-country study. Eur J Clin Nutr 2012;66:639–44. https://doi.org/10.1038/ejcn.2011.225 doi: 10.1038/ejcn.2011.225. [DOI] [PubMed]
  18. Department of Health and Social Care (DHSC). Toolkit for High Quality Neonatal Services. London: DHSC; 2009.
  19. NHS Digital. Supporting Information: National Neonatal Data Set Overview. URL: www.datadictionary.nhs.uk/data_dictionary/messages/clinical_data_sets/overviews/national_neonatal_data_set_overviews/national_neonatal_data_set_overview.asp?shownav=0 (accessed 15 November 2019).
  20. Battersby C, Statnikov Y, Santhakumaran S, Gray D, Modi N, Costeloe K, UK Neonatal Collaborative and Medicines for Neonates Investigator Group. The United Kingdom National Neonatal Research Database: a validation study. PLOS ONE 2018;13:e0201815. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0201815 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0201815. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  21. Battersby C, Longford N, Mandalia S, Costeloe K, Modi N, UK Neonatal Collaborative Necrotising Enterocolitis (UKNC-NEC) Study Group. Incidence and enteral feed antecedents of severe neonatal necrotising enterocolitis across neonatal networks in England, 2012–13: a whole-population surveillance study. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol 2017;2:43–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2468-1253(16)30117-0 doi: 10.1016/S2468-1253(16)30117-0. [DOI] [PubMed]
  22. Battersby C, Longford N, Costeloe K, Modi N, UK Neonatal Collaborative Necrotising Enterocolitis Study Group. Development of a gestational age-specific case definition for neonatal necrotizing enterocolitis. JAMA Pediatr 2017;171:256–63. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapediatrics.2016.3633 doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2016.3633. [DOI] [PubMed]
  23. Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health (RCPCH). National Neonatal Audit Programme (NNAP) 2018 Annual Report on 2017 Data. London: RCPCH; 2018.
  24. Austin PC. An introduction to propensity score methods for reducing the effects of confounding in observational studies. Multivariate Behav Res 2011;46:399–424. https://doi.org/10.1080/00273171.2011.568786 doi: 10.1080/00273171.2011.568786. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  25. Rosenbaum PR. From association to causation in observational studies: the role of tests of strongly ignorable treatment assignment. J Am Stat Assoc 1984;79:41–8. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1984.10477060 doi: 10.1080/01621459.1984.10477060. [DOI]
  26. Imbens GW, Rubin DB. Chapter 16.4: Selecting a Subsample based on the Propensity Score. In Imbens GW, Rubin DB, editors. Causal Inference for Statistics, Social, and Biomedical Sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2015. pp. 366–8. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139025751 doi: 10.1017/CBO9781139025751. [DOI]
  27. Imbens GW, Rubin DB. Chapter 16: Trimming to Improve Balance in Covariate Distributions. In Imbens GW, Rubin DB, editors. Causal Inference for Statistics, Social, and Biomedical Sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2015. pp. 359–74. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139025751 doi: 10.1017/CBO9781139025751. [DOI]
  28. Imbens GW, Rubin DB. Chapter 17: Subclassification on the Propensity Score. In Imbens GW, Rubin DB, editors. Causal Inference for Statistics, Social, and Biomedical Sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2015. pp. 377–400. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139025751 doi: 10.1017/CBO9781139025751. [DOI]
  29. NIHR INVOLVE. What is Public Involvement in Research? URL: www.invo.org.uk/find-out-more/what-is-public-involvement-in-research-2/ (accessed 14 November 2019).
  30. Crocker JC, Ricci-Cabello I, Parker A, Hirst JA, Chant A, Petit-Zeman S, et al. Impact of patient and public involvement on enrolment and retention in clinical trials: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ 2018;363:k4738. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.k4738 doi: 10.1136/bmj.k4738. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  31. Duley L, Uhm S, Oliver S, Preterm Birth Priority Setting Partnership Steering Group. Top 15 UK research priorities for preterm birth. Lancet 2014;383:2041–2. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(14)60989-2 doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)60989-2. [DOI] [PubMed]
  32. Oliver S, Uhm S, Duley L, Crowe S, David AL, James CP, et al. Top research priorities for preterm birth: results of a prioritisation partnership between people affected by preterm birth and healthcare professionals. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth 2019;19:528. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-019-2654-3 doi: 10.1186/s12884-019-2654-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  33. Modi N, Ashby D, Battersby C, Brocklehurst P, Chivers Z, Costeloe K, et al. Developing routinely recorded clinical data from electronic patient records as a national resource to improve neonatal health care: the Medicines for Neonates Research Programme. Programme Grants Appl Res 2019;7(6). https://doi.org/10.3310/pgfar07060 doi: 10.3310/pgfar07060. [DOI] [PubMed]
  34. Battersby C, Longford N, Patel M, Selby E, Ojha S, Dorling J, Gale C. Study protocol: optimising newborn nutrition during and after neonatal therapeutic hypothermia in the United Kingdom: observational study of routinely collected data using propensity matching. BMJ Open 2018;8:e026739. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-026739 doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-026739. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  35. van Puffelen E, Vanhorebeek I, Joosten KFM, Wouters PJ, Van den Berghe G, Verbruggen SCAT. Early versus late parenteral nutrition in critically ill, term neonates: a preplanned secondary subgroup analysis of the PEPaNIC multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet Child Adolesc Health 2018;2:505–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2352-4642(18)30131-7 doi: 10.1016/S2352-4642(18)30131-7. [DOI] [PubMed]
  36. Andrew MJ, Parr JR, Montague-Johnson C, Laler K, Qi C, Baker B, Sullivan PB. Nutritional intervention and neurodevelopmental outcome in infants with suspected cerebral palsy: the Dolphin infant double-blind randomized controlled trial. Dev Med Child Neurol 2018;60:906–13. https://doi.org/10.1111/dmcn.13586 doi: 10.1111/dmcn.13586. [DOI] [PubMed]
  37. Laura F, Mori A, Tataranno ML, Muraca MC, Rodriquez DC, Giomi S, et al. Therapeutic hypothermia in a late preterm infant. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2012;25:125–7. https://doi.org/10.3109/14767058.2012.663172 doi: 10.3109/14767058.2012.663172. [DOI] [PubMed]
  38. Al Tawil K, Sumaily H, Ahmed IA, Sallam A, Al Zaben A, Al Namshan M, Crankson S. Risk factors, characteristics and outcomes of necrotizing enterocolitis in late preterm and term infants. J Neonatal Perinatal Med 2013;6:125–30. https://doi.org/10.3233/NPM-1365912 doi: 10.3233/NPM-1365912. [DOI] [PubMed]
  39. Costeloe K, Hardy P, Juszczak E, Wilks M, Millar MR, Probiotics in Preterm Infants Study Collaborative Group. Bifidobacterium breve BBG-001 in very preterm infants: a randomised controlled phase 3 trial. Lancet 2016;387:649–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(15)01027-2 doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)01027-2. [DOI] [PubMed]
  40. Oliveira V, Singhvi DP, Montaldo P, Lally PJ, Mendoza J, Manerkar S, et al. Therapeutic hypothermia in mild neonatal encephalopathy: a national survey of practice in the UK. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2018;103:F388–90. https://doi.org/10.1136/archdischild-2017-313320 doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2017-313320. [DOI] [PubMed]

RESOURCES