Abstract
In order to enhance the targeting efficiency and reduce anti-tumor drug’s side effects, topotecan (TPT) and F7 were co-loaded in thermosensitive liposomes (F7-TPT-TSL), which show enhanced permeability and retention in tumors, as well as local controlled release by heating in vitro. TPT is a water-soluble inhibitor of topoisomerase I that is converted to an inactive carboxylate structure under physiological conditions (pH 7.4). F7 is a novel drug significantly resistant to cyclin-dependent kinase but its use was restricted by its high toxicity. F7-TPT-TSL had excellent particle distribution (about 103 nm), high entrapment efficiency (>95%), obvious thermosensitive property, and good stability. Confocal microscopy demonstrated specific higher accumulation of TSL in tumor cells. MTT proved F7-TPT-TSL/H had strongest cell lethality compared with other formulations. Then therapeutic efficacy revealed synergism of TPT and F7 co-loaded in TSL, together with hyperthermia. Therefore, the F7-TPT-TSL may serve as a promising system for temperature triggered cancer treatment.
Keywords: F7, topotecan, thermosensitive liposome, tumor hyperthermia, co-delivery
1. Introduction
Malignant tumors are among the most serious diseases affecting human health worldwide. Chemotherapy remains the main anti-tumor strategy; however, the treatment results are often unsatisfactory (Visser et al., 2018; Lange et al., 2019) because of the severe dose-limiting side effects and development of drug resistance after multiple administrations of chemotherapy (Robak et al., 2018; Russo & Sundaramurthi, 2019). Additionally, chemotherapy drugs are not selective for tumor tissues, often causing different degrees of damage to normal cells while killing tumor cells (Bergerot et al., 2019). To improve therapeutic efficacy, multidrug approaches are particularly valuable.
Nano drug carriers have made great achievements, and exogenous carriers are currently studied mostly such as liposomes (Jhaveri et al., 2018), nanoparticles (Ashfaq et al., 2017), microspheres (albumin microspheres, gelatin microspheres, ethylcellulose microspheres, starch microspheres) (Thakare et al., 2017; Nouri et al., 2019) and dendrimer (Bello et al., 2017). In addition, endogenous drug carriers such as cell membranes and exosomes are gradually being studied (Reyes-Ruiz et al., 2019; Su et al., 2020). Using nanodelivery systems, the co-delivery of multiple drugs can increase drug bioavailability and reduce their nonspecific toxicity. Liposomes have good biocompatibility and biodegradability and low toxicity (Morgan et al., 1985; Mu et al., 2017; Johnsen et al., 2018). The liposome surface can be coated with inert polymer molecules such as oligosaccharides, glycoproteins, polysaccharides, and synthetic polymers to prepare ‘invisible’ liposomes, extending their half-lives (Zhang et al., 2016; Li et al., 2017). Using a controlled process, liposomes can be prepared that encapsulate both fat-soluble and water-soluble drugs in particles with sizes of 100–150 nm. Using these liposomes, phagocytosis of the reticuloendothelial system can be avoided in the blood circulation to reduce toxicity (Jain & Jain, 2016). Based on the tumor enhanced permeability and retention effect, liposomes can accumulate at the tumor site to improve drug efficacy (Tiet & Berlin, 2017; Golombek et al., 2018; Li et al., 2019). However, the release of drugs from liposomes is relatively slow; therefore, various response triggers have been investigated to improve drug release, including pH (Yuba et al., 2018), temperature (Lokerse et al., 2016), ultrasound (Wang et al., 2018), photodynamic conversion (Lee et al., 2018), and microwaves (Jin et al., 2016), which allow drugs to be rapidly and specifically released at the tumor site. In 1985, hyperthermia was certified by the FDA as the fifth most widely used cancer treatment method after surgery, radiation therapy, chemotherapy, and biotherapy (Shetake et al., 2016; Mitxelena-Iribarren et al., 2020). Tumor hyperthermia kills tumor cells by heating the tumor site to a temperature slightly above body temperature (Shaterabadi et al., 2018; Das et al., 2019).
Thermosensitive liposomes (TSLs) have been used as targeted drug carriers in combination with tumor hyperthermia to achieve synergistic effects (Ta & Porter, 2013; Ta et al., 2014): (1) the drug can be highly enriched in tumor tissue. After local heating of the tumor, the membrane fluidity of the cancer cells and vascular permeability of the tumor increase, and thus hyperthermia can promote entry of the drug into tumor cells. The phase of the TSL bilayer film changes to a liquid crystal state with high fluidity and the film structure loosens so that the packaged product is released quickly (Ta et al., 2010; Evans, 2017). (2) Many chemotherapeutic drugs induce apoptosis through different mechanisms, which can be promoted by hyperthermia. (3) Hyperthermia can reach a higher temperature in the central part of tumor tissues, an acidic environment where tumor cell apoptosis is likely to occur (Haemmerich & Motamarry, 2018). Heating can improve blood circulation around the tumor, which is beneficial for drug entry (Gao et al., 2019). Additionally, drug release induced by increased temperature (approximately 42 °C) has been confirmed in vitro and mice. Various preclinical experiments performed to analyze hyperthermia combined with TSLs have shown promising results, such as ThermoDox in III clinical experiments (Yatvin et al., 1978; Poon & Borys, 2009; Hashemi et al., 2018).
Topotecan (TPT) is a water-soluble semi-synthetic camptothecin derivative that inhibits topoisomerase I and specifically interacts with Topo1-DNA to form a ‘drug-Top1-DNA’ ternary complex (Tsuda & Kitamasu, 2019). It inhibits DNA single-strand breakage and rejoining, prevents DNA replication, and leads to apoptosis (Pommier, 2006; Padhi et al., 2018). In 1996, TPT was approved by the FDA for treating ovarian cancer and small cell lung cancer. TPT has broad-spectrum anti-tumor spectrum effects and strongly inhibits various cancer cell lines, indicating its good potential for clinical application. However, TPT is unstable under physiological conditions because the ring-opening of the drugs at physiological pH (pH 7.4) results in conversion to an inactive carboxylate structure, affecting drug efficacy (Rosca et al., 2015; Xing et al., 2015; Xu & Pan, 2019). To contribute to the removal of the lactone ring-opening, Tarhan et al. prepared magnetic dextran branched with NαNα-Bis (carboxymethyl)-l-lysine hydrate (NTA) nanoparticles (MD 3) to release drug at the pH of tumor environment (Tarhan et al., 2019).
The novel purine derivative F7, synthesized by Professor Herve Galons’ team at the Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences of the French Academy of Sciences, is a promising anticancer drug that acts on the pathological state of imbalance between apoptosis and cell division and has broad-spectrum anti-tumor effects. F7 has shown curative effects in lung cancer, breast cancer, and liver cancer, among other cancer types, including excellent effects against chronic lymphocytic leukemia and multiple cysts. It is significantly resistant to cyclin-dependent kinase compared to roscovitine (Hobbs et al., 1998; Ott et al., 2017). However, in pharmacodynamics research in vivo, the systemic toxicity of F7 in mice was shown to be severe, limiting the drug development of F7. Therefore, it may be necessary to combine F7 drugs with other drugs to reduce dose and side effects while avoiding drug resistance.
In this study, we designed and developed a co-loaded thermosensitive liposome (F7-TPT-TSL) which was simultaneously loaded with F7 and TPT by the pH gradient method to stabilize the drug in the inner aqueous phase. These particles had suitable sizes and thermal properties for tumor treatment applications. After tail vein injection to xenograft tumor model nude mice, the co-loaded thermosensitive liposomes first accumulated at the tumor site through blood circulation; upon heating to 42.5 °C, the drug was rapidly released and F7-TPT-TSL showed reduced toxicity, high effectiveness, and anti-drug effects.
2. Materials and methods
2.1. Materials
Compound F7 was synthesized by the Galons team of the Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences of the French Academy of Sciences; Topotecan was from Meryer Chemical Technology Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China); 1,2-dipalmitoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine (DPPC); 1,2-distearoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphoethanolamine-N-(amino (polyethylene glycol)-2000) (DSPE-mPEG2000), and myristoyl hemolytic lecithin (MSPC) were purchased from A.V.T. (Shanghai, China); methanol (chromatographic pure grade) was acquired from Concord Co., Ltd. (Tianjin, China); CHCl3 was from Sinopharm Chemical Reagent Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China); RPMI-1640 was a gift from Sigma-Aldrich (Steinheim, Germany); Milli-Q water was used in all the experiments.
2.2. Preparation of different liposome formulations
F7 and TPT were simultaneously loaded into liposomes, formulated with DPPC:DSPE-PEG2000:MSPC = 81:16:3 (weight ratio) using the active loading way (Li et al., 2016). First of all, the blank liposomes were prepared by lipid film hydration and extrusion. The lipids were dissolved in chloroform and the solvent was removed under vacuum in rotary evaporator forming the homogeneous lipid film, vacuum dried for 8 h. Then lipid film was hydrated in 200 mM citric acid buffer solution at 50 °C. The newly formed multilamellar lipid vesicles were shattered by ultrasound, extruding through a 200 nm polycarbonate filter and resulted in small TSL with a uniform size.
F7 and TPT (1:1, w/w) were loaded into the liposome using the pH gradient method at 1:30 drug/lipids mass ratio. Liposome suspension was directly added into 200 mM citric acid buffer drug solution, and then we adjusted the pH of the extrinsic phase to 7.5 using Na2CO3 solution. As a result, liposomes with a pH gradient between extrinsic and interior phase were developed, then incubated for about 30 min. In the end, most drug molecules were locked in the interior phases as ionotropic F7 and TPT. Then, F7-TPT-TSL was sterilized by 200 nm polycarbonate filter and subpackaged to aseptic pails.
F7 thermosensitive liposomes (F7-TSL) and topotecan thermosensitive liposomes (TPT-TSL) were prepared as described above.
2.3. Dynamic light scattering
Particle size, polydispersity index (PDI), and zeta potential of different liposome formulations were measured by dynamic light scattering (DLS) technique via Zetasizer NanoZS90 (Nano-ZS90, Malvern Instrument, Malvern, UK) at 25 ± 1 °C.
2.4. Transmission electron microscope (TEM)
The TEM imaging was performed on transmission electron microscopy (JEM-1010, JEOL Ltd., Tokyo, Japan) operated at an acceleration voltage of 80 kV. For sample preparation, 20 μL of F7-TPT-TSL were dropped onto 300 mesh copper TEM grid and the excess dispersions were then removed after 3 min; after that, the adsorbed sample was stained with 20 μL of 3% phosphotungstic acid for 30 s.
2.5. Differential scanning calorimetry
Differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) thermograms were obtained by loading the samples into an aluminum pan and subjected to the heat cycle in a differential scanning calorimeter (DSC 200 F3 Maia, NETZSCH, Selb, Germany) at a ramp rate of 10 °C/min from 20 to 80 °C. All the cycles were operated under a nitrogen gas atmosphere. An empty pan was employed as a reference to eliminate the calorimetric effect of the pan.
2.6. Entrapment efficiency
HPLC was used for the quantitative determination of F7 and TPT. The separation was performed on a column (Eclipse XDB-C18 4.6 mm × 150 mm, 5 μm). The mobile phase: methanol 25–50%, 0–10 min; 50–75%, 10–30 min; 1.5% triethylamine aqueous solution (adjusted with phosphoric acid to pH 4.0) 75–50%, 0–10 min; 50–75%, 10–30 min. Mobile phase was pumped at a flow rate of 1.0 mL/min and the detection wavelength was 268 nm.
An ultrafiltration technique was used to separate the unencapsulated F7 and TPT from liposomes. F7-TPT-TSL was diluted 10 times with Milli-Q water and then placed in the upper chamber of a centrifuge tube matched with an ultrafilter (Sartorius Vivaspin 500 μL, 30 k MWCO PES, Goettingen, Germany) and was centrifuged for 10 min at 11,180×g. The ultrafiltrate in the ultrafilter containing the unencapsulated drug was determined by HPLC, as described above. The total drug in F7-TPT-TSL was determined through SDS solution (5%) disruption by HPLC. The entrapment efficiency (EE%) was calculated using the following equation:
(1) |
EE (%) was obtained according to Equation (1), where Cy and Cx represent the total drug in TSL and the amount of free drug in the ultrafiltrate, respectively.
2.7. Stability study
After the blank-TSL and F7-TPT-TSL were stored at 4 °C for 1 month, their stability in different 10-fold dilutions was tested. The stability was monitored with a Turbiscan Lab® Expert (Formulaction, Toulouse, France), an innovative analytical instruments to determine the small changes of colloidal systems. To obtain these data, the samples were placed into cylindrical glass tubes and then submitted to Turbiscan Lab® Expert at predesigned time points. The stability was evaluated with delta transmission and delta backscattering as indexes.
2.8. In vitro release kinetics
Release of F7 and TPT from F7-TPT-TSL as a function of temperature (37 °C and 41 °C) was performed using a dialysis technique. In this study, liposomes with a volume of 2 mL were added into a cellulose acetate dialysis bag (MWCO 8–14 kDa) and immersed in 68 mL PBS buffer medium (pH7.4, containing 0.5%SDS), followed by magnetic stirring at 100 rpm at the predesigned temperature. At predetermined time intervals, release media was collected and replaced with an equal amount of fresh media. The released drug was quantified using the HPLC method as mentioned above.
(2) |
The cumulative release rate (%) was obtained according to Equation (2), where Ci is the measured concentration and (CF7-TPT-TSL*2) is the amount of drug in the liposome.
2.9. Cell subculture
Human lung large cell carcinoma NCI-H460 (H460) was kindly donated by Prof. Zhi Yao (Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, China) and was acquired from Shanghai Institutes for Biological Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences (Shanghai, China). NCI-H460 cells were cultured in RPMI 1640 medium with 10% (v/v) fetal bovine serum (FBS) and 1% penicillin–streptomycin (100 units/mL, 100 μg/mL) at 37 °C in a humidified atmosphere of 5% CO2. Human breast adenocarcinoma cells (MCF-7) purchased from the Cell Resource Center of IBMS (Beijing, China) were maintained in culture medium consisting of DMEM supplemented with 10% (v/v) FBS and 1% penicillin–streptomycin (100 units/mL, 100 μg/mL) at 37 °C in a humidified atmosphere of 5% CO2.
2.10. Cellular uptake studies
H460 cells (5 × 104 cells/well) were seeded in a six-well plate for 24 h and then treated with free Cou6-DOX solution and CD-TSL (Cou6 and doxorubicin co-loaded thermosensitive liposome). After incubation for 4 h, the media were changed. The cells were washed by PBS three times and then fixed by incubating with 1 mL of 4% paraformaldehyde for 20 min. The cells were then washed by PBS for three times to remove excess agents. For nuclei staining, 1 mL of DAPI (4,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole, 1 μg/mL) solution was added into cells and incubated for 5 min. After the incubation, the cells were softly washed three times to remove excessive DAPI. At last, cells were imaged under inverted fluorescence microscopy (Nikon ECLIPSE Ti). The fluorescence images were taken under a ×10 objective.
2.11. Apoptosis assay
Since F7 is a novel compound, no study has published on the ability of F7 compounds and F7 nano preparations to inhibit tumor growth, we first investigated the ability of F7 and F7-TSL to promote apoptosis of tumor cells. We used the Annexin V-FITC kit (Tianjin Sungene Biotech Co., Ltd., Tianjin, China) to detect apoptosis. MCF-7 cells (5 × 104 cells/well) were seeded into six-well plates for 24 h and then were treated with F7 and F7-TSL (0.07, 0.2, 0.7, and 2 μM) for 24 h. Adherent cells were trypsinized and resuspended. After resuspended, cells were added by 5 μL annexin V-FITC and 5 μL propidium iodide (PI) and then incubated for 15 min at room temperature in the dark. The samples were analyzed with a BD FACS Canto II flow cytometer (Becton Dickinson, Franklin Lakes, NJ). Flow cytometry analysis was performed with untreated cells as a control.
2.12. Cytotoxicity assay
H460 cells (5 × 104 cells/well) were seeded in a 96-well plate for 24 h. The cells were treated with increasing concentrations F7 (0.004, 0.02, 0.1, 0.5, and 2.5 μmol/L) and TPT (0.004, 0.02, 0.1, 0.5, and 2.5 μmol/L) alone or combination, and heated immediately by immersing the cell-seeded plate in a water bath at 41 °C for 30 min. The cells were subsequently incubated at 37 °C for 47.5 h and their viability was evaluated using an assay with 3-(4,5-dimethyl-2-thiazolyl)-2,5-diphenyl-2H-tetrazolium bromide (MTT). Also, for the normal temperature group, the cell plate after dosing was directly transferred to the incubator for 48 hours and then measured.
2.13. Antitumor efficacy in vivo
Female nu/nu nude mice (weighing 18–22 g) were purchased from Vital River Laboratories (Beijing, China). A xenograft tumor model was produced via a subcutaneous injection of MCF-7 cells. All procedures involving animal housing and treatment were approved by the Animal Care and Use Ethics Committee of the Academy of Military Medical Sciences.
Fifty-four female nude mice (MCF-7) were randomly divided into the control group (saline sham), F7 solution group, TPT solution group, F7-TPT solution, F7-TPT solution/H group, F7-TSL group, TPT-TSL group, F7-TPT-TSL group, and F7-TPT-TSL/HT group (n = 6).
The administration method was tail vein injection, and the heated group was contacted with a 42.5 °C copper column to heat the tumor site for 30 min. The treatment interval was four days and the number of treatments was six times. The above-mentioned preparations were administered to nude mice at a concentration of 100 μg/mL, and the dose was 1 mg/kg (the combined drug group dose is F7 0.5 mg/kg + TPT 0.5 mg/kg). Tumor volume was continuously monitored during dosing, and body weight changes were recorded.
Two days after the end of treatment, the above nude mice were humanely euthanized, the tumor tissues were excised and weighed, and the tumor inhibition rate was calculated.
During the experiment, the weight of mice was affected by many factors, including the growth of mice, the increase of tumor, and the systemic toxicity of drugs. It is not very accurate to just use the weight change of mice to evaluate the drug toxicity. The relative weight change rate was used to evaluate the drug toxicity, and its calculation formula is as follows:
(3) |
Relative weight change rate was obtained according to Equation (3), where body weight 22 d are body weight of mice treated for 22 days and body weight 0 d are initial body weight of mice.
(4) |
Tumor volume was obtained according to Equation (4), where length and width are the maximum and minimum diameters of a tumor, respectively
(5) |
Tumor inhibition rate (%) was obtained according to Equation (5), where Mtherapy group indicates mean tumor mass of the treatment group and Mcontrol group indicates the mean tumor mass of the control group.
3. Results
3.1. Preparation and characterization of F7-TSL
Figure 1 shows a schematic of F7-TPT-TSL loaded with F7 and TPT. F7-TPT-TSL was prepared by the pH gradient method based on the nature of the drug itself. F7 has high solubility under acidic conditions and is nearly insoluble under neutral conditions. TPT can maintain an active lactone structure in an acidic environment, and a pH gradient is formed by adjusting the pH of the internal and external aqueous phases. The drug enters the internal aqueous phase of the liposome in the molecular form and is stabilized in the ionic form. Various liposomes loaded with F7 and TPT were prepared, and their particle size, zeta potential, and encapsulation efficiency (EE%) were determined, as summarized in Table 1.
Table 1.
Code | Encapsulation efficiency (%) |
Particle size (nm) | PDI | Potential (mV) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
F7 | TPT | ||||
Blank TSL | – | – | 89.86 ± 3.34 | 0.173 ± 0.016 | –8.62 ± 1.01 |
F7-TSL | 99.97 ± 2.27 | – | 111.63 ± 8.81 | 0.201 ± 0.020 | –15.48 ± 6.20 |
TPT-TSL | – | 98.73 ± 0.39 | 105.64 ± 8.68 | 0.200 ± 0.020 | –16.91 ± 3.32 |
F7-TPT-TSL | 97.42 ± 0.74 | 95.15 ± 4.23 | 103.00 ± 9.84 | 0.194 ± 0.015 | –14.28 ± 4.02 |
By using a transmembrane gradient of pH, we achieved efficient loading of F7 and TPT in the aqueous phase of the liposome. The TSL showed an encapsulation efficiency of more than 95%, a particle diameter of approximately 100 nm, and narrow particle size distribution (PDI < 0.3), showing a good distribution. The particle size distribution graph and potential distribution graph of F7-TPT-TSL are shown in Figure 2.
3.2. Morphology analysis
The morphology of F7-TPT-TSL was observed by TEM. As shown in Figure 2, the liposome was spherical or oval, and the morphology was consistent with the assumed result.
3.3. Liposomal phase transition temperature analysis
The phase transition temperature of the main membrane DPPC prepared in this study was 41 °C, and the interaction of different ratios of phospholipids enabled the preparation of liposomes with different phase transition temperatures. Blank liposomes were prepared and showed a phase transition temperature of 40.3 °C, which is slightly lower than that of DPPC (Figure 3). This temperature is suitable for inducing hypothermia in human tumors.
3.4. Thermal release analysis
To verify the thermal sensitivity of F7-TPT-TSL, we evaluated the drug release profile. We performed three release experiments. As shown in Figure 4, after dialyzing co-loaded F7-TPT-TSL at 41 °C, the release of TPT showed a significant thermal response. In the first 5 min of heating, the average release of TPT reached 36%; after heating for 30 min, the average release was 83%. However, the release of the F7 showed an average rate of only 11% after heating for 30 min. The thermosensitive release was verified in vitro, showing a good release profile of the water-soluble drug TPT. The reason for the low release of F7 was the structural characteristics of the drug itself. F7 is an amphiphilic compound that is fat-soluble. Therefore, even if the membrane morphology of the TSL changes from a colloidal state to a liquid crystalline state, the lipid bilayer membrane remains intact. When F7 penetrates the phospholipid bilayer, it sticks to the middle of the bilayer membrane, affecting drug release detection and causing the in vitro release data to deviate from the ideal state. The release profile in vitro showed that when the TSL was at the phase transition temperature, the TPT release was accelerated, which did not significantly affect F7. At 37 °C, 30.60% of TPT and 2.34% of F7 were released. The transition of the liposome membrane from the colloidal state to the liquid crystal state was not instantaneous; first, a pre-phase transformation occurred at a temperature of approximately 5 °C lower than the main phase. Between the pre-phase transition and main phase transition, the membrane phases became separated and the membrane structure became hollow, releasing the encapsulated drug at a slow rate.
3.5. Stability analysis
As shown in Figure 5, the physical stability of blank-TSL and F7-TPT-TSL was analyzed using a stability meter. After storage for 1 month at 4 °C, the blank liposomes and co-loaded liposomes were stable in water and serum, indicating that the liposome preparations had high physical stability and showed no aggregation or sedimentation. We also tested the stability of the F7 and TPT powder. As a result, the stability of TPT fluctuated widely, likely because of the lactone ring in the structure. Therefore, F7 and TPT can be effectively encapsulated in liposomes.
3.6. Cellular uptake assay
The cell-penetrating efficiency of TSL was further evaluated by inverted fluorescence microscopy. To clarify the internalization of the liposomes, the cell nuclei were stained with DAPI (blue) and Cou6-DOX-solution which shows green fluorescence (Cou-6) and red fluorescence (DOX). CD-TSL shows red fluorescence and green fluorescence. As shown in Figure 6, CD-TSL had stronger red fluorescence intensity than Cou6-DOX-solution had, indicating that the phospholipid membrane facilitates low fat-soluble drug entry to cells through fusion effects, while water-soluble drugs have poor ability to enter cells. For Cou-6 distributed in the TSL membrane, images of the green fluorescence of CD-TSL showed that TSL could enter the cells via membrane fusion.
3.7. Cell assay in vitro
Flow cytometry studies were performed to calculate the cytotoxic potential of different F7 formulations in terms of apoptosis and necrosis (Figure 7). F7 solution at 0.07, 0.2, 0.7, and 2 μM showed apoptosis rates of 5.32%, 10.71%, 15.28%, and 41.59%, respectively, and F7-TSL at 0.07, 0.2, 0.7, and 2 μM showed apoptosis rates of 7.63%, 12.81%, 17.67%, and 50.94%, respectively (Figure 7). With increasing drug concentrations, cell survival gradually decreased whereas apoptosis and necrosis gradually increased, showing concentration-dependent effects.
Cell survival of normal drugs and different liposome preparations after normal treatment and auxiliary heat treatment was determined using the MTT assay. The cytotoxicity of different concentrations of TPT solution, F7-solution, F7 + TPT solution, TPT-TSL, F7-TSL, F7-TPT-TSL, and F7-TPT-TSL/H was investigated to detect dose-dependent anticancer activity. The half-maximal inhibitory concentration (IC50) of each formulation is listed in Table 2. As shown in Figure 8, the drug combination (F7 and TPT solution) exhibited a synergistic effect (CI < 1) (total dose of 0.008–0.2 μΜ). As the concentration increased, all formulations showed significantly increased cytotoxicity. The combination drug group showed stronger cytotoxic effects than F7 or TPT monotherapy. Additionally, higher toxicity was observed when the drug was encapsulated in the liposomes (p < .05), for both the single drug effect or via co-stimulation of F7 and TPT, particularly after heating (p < .05). Importantly, cell viability in the heated group was significantly different compared to the normal liposome group (p < .001) (Figure 9). This is because, under normal circumstances, liposomes are more likely than small molecule drugs to enter cells; heating at 41 °C increased the permeability of the cell membrane, making the cells more likely to take up liposomes. A high temperature accelerated the accumulation of F7 and TPT in the cells, and then acted on different targets to kill the cells, eventually achieving a synergistic effect.
Table 2.
Different formulations | TPT solution | F7 solution | F7 + TPT solution | TPT-TSL | F7-TSL | F7-TPT-TSL | F7-TPT-TSL/H |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IC50 (μΜ) | 0.8184 | 0.4426 | 0.3052 | 0.3951 | 0.1828 | 0.2154 | 0.07524 |
3.8. Inhibition of tumor growth in vivo
We recorded changes in the mouse body weight and tumor size. As shown in Figure 10(a), PBS did not inhibit tumor growth and rapidly achieved maximum tumor volume at the end of day 22. Delivery of free drugs (1 mg/kg) did control the growth of tumors to an extent however inefficient in completely controlling its proliferation. The F7-TPT-TSL/H exhibited relatively better tumor growth inhibition by comparison to free F7-TPT-solution. As expected, F7-TPT-TSL/H showed significant (p < .01) inhibition of tumor growth compared with F7-solution and TPT-solution. This could be due to the synergistic inhibitory effect of F7 and TPT on the tumor proliferation. The tumor mass was excised and the weight of individual tumors is presented in Figure 10(b). Consistent with the tumor volume, F7-TPT-TSL/H showed a significantly (p < .01) smaller tumor size compared to that of either F7-TPT-solution or F7-TPT-TSL. The calculated rate of relative weight change is shown in Figure 1(c) and Table 3. The weight of mice in the treatment group showed a negative increase, and F7-solution was the most obvious. The simple drug combination (F7-TPT-solution) did not change this situation. However, F7-TPT-TSL seems to alleviate toxic and side effects (p < .01). Of course, this requires more in-depth research to confirm that the combination of drug TSLs can reduce systemic toxicity. Figure 10(d) shows the tumor weight and tumor inhibition rate after 22 days of treatment in mice. Overall, the tumor inhibition rate of the liposome group is greater than that of the corresponding free drug, specifically, F7-TPT-TSL/H > F7-TPT-TSL > F7-TSL > F7-TPT-solution/H > F7-TPT-solution > F7-solution > TPT-TSL > TPT-solution. The remarkable tumor efficacy was due to the combination of thermal-liposome carrier and hypothermia which further increased the chemotherapeutic efficacy of drug combination. Encapsulation of the two drugs in the liposome significantly improved the efficacy and avoided the strong systemic toxicity caused by a single use of the F7 solution. Therefore, by reducing systemic toxicity or the anti-tumor growth ability, the F7-TPT-TSL/H group achieved a more prominent effect than the other groups.
Table 3.
Different formulations | Control | F7-solution | TPT-solution | F7-TPT-solution | F7-TPT-solution/H | F7-TSL | TPT-TSL | F7-TPT-TSL | F7-TPT-TSL/H |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Tumor weight (g) | 2.25 ± 0.28 | 1.64 ± 0.12 | 1.82 ± 0.11 | 1.32 ± 0.08 | 1.18 ± 0.18 | 1.05 ± 0.16 | 1.71 ± 0.12 | 0.74 ± 0.02 | 0.33 ± 0.08 |
Body weight (g)/0 d | 20.82 ± 0.56 | 20.88 ± 0.96 | 20.86 ± 0.74 | 20.78 ± 0.22 | 20.68 ± 0.15 | 20.92 ± 0.45 | 21.04 ± 0.33 | 20.78 ± 0.42 | 20.85 ± 0.53 |
Body weight (g)/22 d | 24.86 ± 1.61 | 19.23 ± 1.12 | 21.34 ± 1.14 | 19.64 ± 1.52 | 20.52 ± 0.86 | 20.42 ± 0.76 | 21.74 ± 0.84 | 20.68 ± 0.56 | 20.60 ± 0.88 |
Relative weight change (%) | 8.60 ± 1.23 | –15.76 ± 1.26 | –6.42 ± 1.22 | –11.84 ± 1.04 | –6.48 ± 0.65 | –7.41 ± 0.32 | –4.80 ± 0.46 | –4.04 ± 0.57 | –2.78 ± 0.22 |
The most characteristic features of tumors are invasive and rapid growth. When the tumor diameter reaches 2 mm3, vasculature-like angiogenesis of the mutated cancer cells provides nutrition to the tumor; the cancer cells are loosely distributed and disordered, and the vascular wall gap is 380–780 nm (Ballet, 1990; Liechty & Peppas, 2012; Sun, 2016). This appropriate gap size allows the liposome formulation to permeate the tumor vessel wall and remain in tumor tissue sites, and heating triggers the rapid release of the drug to achieve better anti-tumor effects and reduce systemic toxicity (Zhang et al., 2016). F7-TPT-TSL showed an appropriate particle size of approximately 100 nm, enabling the PEGylated lipid to evade phagocytosis of the reticuloendothelial system during blood circulation and accumulate at tumor sites via the enhanced permeability and retention effect. When the TSL reached the tumor tissue site, a high temperature of 41 °C was applied to increase cell membrane permeability and drug accessibility at the target cells. The TSL showed a phase change, and both drugs were rapidly released to act on the tumor cells to inhibit growth and avoid resistance caused by a single drug. As shown in Figure 10, F7-TPT-TSL/H showed the strongest ability to inhibit tumor growth.
4. Discussion
Liposomes are used as drug carriers for tumor treatment because of their biocompatibility, biodegradability, particle size, hydrophobic and hydraulic characteristics, flexible structure, non-toxicity, and non-immunogenicity (Haeri et al., 2016). We prepared F7 and TPT co-loaded TSL with membranes composed of DPPC, DSPE-mPEG2000, and MSPC. The exact temperature and width of the phase transition are determined by the lipid composition (de Matos et al., 2018). The TSL was prepared from a synthetic phospholipid, and the phase transition temperature of the main material, DPPC, was 41 °C. As the three phospholipid materials were mixed in a specific ratio, the resulting liposomes showed a phase transition temperature of 40.3 °C (Figure 3). The addition of DSPE-mPEG2000 can help liposomes escape phagocytosis by the reticuloendothelial system in the blood circulation and prolong the circulation time of liposomes in vivo. Minimal MSPC was added as a catalyst to destroy the lipid bilayer.
TPT and F7 were co-loaded into the liposomes. The drugs entered the internal aqueous phase of the liposomes in molecular form and were stable in the form of ions. By measuring the levels of both drugs by high-performance liquid chromatography, the amounts of both drugs in the co-loaded liposomes can be precisely controlled. As the encapsulation efficiency of both drugs was greater than 95%, it was unnecessary to remove the free drug from the external aqueous phase. The size of liposomal particles can significantly affect their in vivo behavior, and the carrier (liposome) releases the drugs upon external stimulation (Ott et al., 2017).
Synchronous release of both drugs can optimize synergy. In this study, the in vitro release data deviated from the ideal state at 41 °C. When the TSLs were at the phase transition temperature, TPT release was accelerated, whereas that of F7 was not significantly affected (Figure 4). However, simple in vitro release does not simulate the pattern of drugs in the body. Passive diffusion through lipid membranes is a common mode of transport of fat-soluble drugs. Besides, liposomes can enter cells by endocytosis, membrane fusion, and other mechanisms. Thus, encapsulated drugs can be delivered to the cells simultaneously. Based on the in vivo environment and methods of liposome entry into cells, the F7-TPT-TSL formulation was located in the tumor tissue and the loaded drugs were synchronized. The MTT assay validated the synergistic effects of the drugs (Figure 8).
The fate of liposomes in vivo was further investigated based on the differences between the in vitro and in vivo environments. The biological basis of hyperthermia is that with increasing temperature, cell membrane fluidity, and cell sensitivity both increased. The combination of hyperthermia and chemotherapy has been widely studied. Hyperthermia increases blood flow and vascular permeability in the tumor, enabling liposomes to widely infiltrate the tumor, thus improving the local drug concentration (Li et al., 2016). In this study, the heating group was contacted by a 42.5 °C copper column to heat the tumor site. The results showed that the F7-TPT-TSL/H group achieved prominent effects regardless of systemic toxicity or anti-tumor growth ability (Figure 10). Therefore, co-loaded F7-TPT-TSL was the best preparation for inhibiting tumor growth.
Co-loaded liposomes have been shown to have enhanced therapeutic potential for cancer. Both cytotoxicities in vitro and antitumor activity studies in vivo have demonstrated the superior efficacy of co-loaded liposomes compared to their solution mixtures or liposomes loaded with a single drug. These results confirm that co-loaded TSLs can enhance anti-tumor therapeutic effects by controlling the ratio of effective drugs in target tissues.
5. Conclusions
In this study, the constructed delivery system F7-TPT-TSL showed good physico-chemical features such as uniform particle size, near zero zeta potential, really proud entrapment efficiency, obvious thermo-sensitive characteristics, and excellent in vitro stability. More importantly, the vesicles exhibited strong tumor inhibitory activities when they were combined with hyperthermia, both in vitro and in vivo. Based on the bio-distribution of TSL, we have made full use of the synergistic effects of TPT and F7 in tumor suppression, and the restriction of their toxicity. The promising results warrant future studies which involve improve in vivo study including survival analysis and tissue distribution of F7-TPT-TSL, as well as develop more potential drug combination encapsulated in TSL to achieving much greater therapeutic effects. And for many novel compounds similar to F7 (high efficiency but too high toxicity), TSL may totally change their in vivo bio-distribution and decrease systemic toxicity, expanding their applications in chemotherapy.
Funding Statement
The research was supported by Tianjin Natural Science General Project Fund [2018KJ124] and Open Fund of Tianjin Enterprise Key Laboratory on Hyaluronic Acid Application Research [no. KTRDHA-Y201906] provided by Tianjin Kangting Bioengineering Group Corp. Ltd.
Disclosure statement
The authors have no potential conflict of interest to disclose.
References
- Ashfaq UA, Riaz M, Yasmeen E, Yousaf MZ. (2017). Recent advances in nanoparticle-based targeted drug-delivery systems against cancer and role of tumor microenvironment. Crit Rev Ther Drug Carrier Syst 34:317–53. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ballet F. (1990). Hepatic circulation: potential for therapeutic intervention. Pharmacol Ther 47:281–328. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bello M, Fragoso-Vázquez J, Correa-Basurto J. (2017). Theoretical studies for dendrimer-based drug delivery. Curr Pharm Des 23:3048–61. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bergerot CD, Razavi M, Philip EJ, et al. (2019). Association between chemotherapy toxicity risk scores and physical symptoms among older Brazilian adults with cancer. J Geriatr Oncol 11:280–3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Das P, Colombo M, Prosperi D. (2019). Recent advances in magnetic fluid hyperthermia for cancer therapy. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces 174:42–55. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- de Matos MBC, Beztsinna N, Heyder C, et al. (2018). Thermosensitive liposomes for triggered release of cytotoxic proteins. Eur J Pharm Biopharm 132:211–21. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Evans DGR. (2017). Cancer and central nervous system tumor surveillance in pediatric neurofibromatosis 1. Clin Cancer Res 23:46–53. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gao Y, Huang W, Yang C, et al. (2019). Targeted photothermal therapy of mice and rabbits realized by macrophage-loaded tungsten carbide. Biomater Sci 7:5350–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Golombek S, May JN, Theek BJ, et al. (2018). Tumor targeting via EPR: strategies to enhance patient responses. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 130:17–38. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Haemmerich D, Motamarry A. (2018). Thermosensitive liposomes for image-guided drug delivery. Adv Cancer Res 139:121–46. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Haeri A, Zalba S, ten Hagen TLM, et al. (2016). EGFR targeted thermosensitive liposomes: a novel multifunctional platform for simultaneous tumor targeted and stimulus responsive drug delivery. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces 146:657–69. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hashemi M, Omidi M, Muralidharan B, et al. (2018). Layer-by-layer assembly of graphene oxide on thermosensitive liposomes for photo-chemotherapy. Acta Biomater 65:376–92. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hobbs SK, Monsky WL, Yuan F, et al. (1998). Regulation of transport pathways in tumor vessels: role of tumor type and microenvironment. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 95:4607–12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Jain A, Jain SK. (2016). Multipronged, strategic delivery of paclitaxel-topotecan using engineered liposomes to ovarian cancer. Drug Dev Ind Pharm 42:136–49. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Jhaveri A, Deshpande P, Pattni B, Torchilin V. (2018). Transferrin-targeted, resveratrol-loaded liposomes for the treatment of glioblastoma. J Control Release 277:89–101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Jin Y, Liang X, An Y, Dai Z. (2016). Microwave-triggered smart drug release from liposomes co-encapsulating doxorubicin and salt for local combined hyperthermia and chemotherapy of cancer. Bioconjug Chem 27:2931–42. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Johnsen KB, Gudbergsson JM, Duroux M, et al. (2018). On the use of liposome controls in studies investigating the clinical potential of extracellular vesicle-based drug delivery systems – a commentary. J Control Release 269:10–4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lange M, Castel H, Le Fel J, et al. (2019). How to assess and manage cognitive impairment induced by treatments of non-central nervous system cancer. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 107:602–14. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lee H, Han J, Shin H, et al. (2018). Combination of chemotherapy and photodynamic therapy for cancer treatment with sonoporation effects. J Control Release 283:190–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Li M, Shi F, Fei X, et al. (2017). PEGylated long-circulating liposomes deliver homoharringtonine to suppress multiple myeloma cancer stem cells. Exp Biol Med (Maywood) 242:996–1004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Li MY, Du CY, Guo N, et al. (2019). Composition design and medical application of liposomes. Eur J Med Chem 164:640–53. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Li MY, Li ZP, Yang Y, et al. (2016). Thermo-sensitive liposome co-loaded of vincristine and doxorubicin based on their similar physicochemical properties had synergism on tumor treatment. Pharm Res 33:1881–98. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Liechty WB, Peppas NA. (2012). Expert opinion: responsive polymer nanoparticles in cancer therapy. Eur J Pharm Biopharm 80:241–6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lokerse WJM, Kneepkens ECM, ten Hagen TLM, et al. (2016). In depth study on thermosensitive liposomes: optimizing formulations for tumor specific therapy and in vitro to in vivo relations. Biomaterials 82:138–50. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Thakare M, Israel B, Garner S, et al. (2017). Nonionic surfactant structure on the drug release, formulation and physical properties of ethylcellulose microspheres. Pharm Dev Technol 22:418–25. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mitxelena-Iribarren O, Campisi J, Martínez I, et al. (2020). Glass-coated ferromagnetic microwire-induced magnetic hyperthermia for in vitro cancer cell treatment. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl 106:110261. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Morgan JR, Williams LA, Howard CB. (1985). Technetium-labelled liposome imaging for deep-seated infection. Br J Radiol 58:35–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mu LM, Ju RJ, Liu R, et al. (2017). Dual-functional drug liposomes in treatment of resistant cancers. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 115:46–56. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Nouri YM, Kim JH, Yoon HK, et al. (2019). Update on transarterial chemoembolization with drug-eluting microspheres for hepatocellular carcinoma. Korean J Radiol 20:34–49. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ott PA, Bang Y-J, Berton-Rigaud D, et al. (2017). Safety and antitumor activity of pembrolizumab in advanced programmed death ligand 1-positive endometrial cancer: results from the KEYNOTE-028 study. J Clin Oncol 35:2535–41. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Padhi S, Kapoor R, Verma D, et al. (2018). Formulation and optimization of topotecan nanoparticles: in vitro characterization, cytotoxicity, cellular uptake and pharmacokinetic outcomes. J Photochem Photobiol B Biol 183:222–32. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Pommier Y. (2006). Topoisomerase I inhibitors: camptothecins and beyond. Nat Rev Cancer 6:89–802. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Poon RT, Borys N. (2009). Lyso-thermosensitive liposomal doxorubicin: a novel approach to enhance efficacy of thermal ablation of liver cancer. Expert Opin Pharmacother 10:333–43. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Reyes-Ruiz JM, Osuna-Ramos JF, De Jesús-González LA, et al. (2019). Isolation and characterization of exosomes released from mosquito cells infected with dengue virus. Virus Res 266:1–14. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Robak P, Drozdz I, Szemraj J, Robak T. (2018). Drug resistance in multiple myeloma. Cancer Treat Rev 70:199–208. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rosca EV, Wright M, Gonitel R, et al. (2015). Thermosensitive, near-infrared-labeled nanoparticles for topotecan delivery to tumors. Mol Pharm 12:1335–46. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Russo MM, Sundaramurthi T. (2019). An overview of cancer pain: epidemiology and pathophysiology. Semin Oncol Nurs 35:223–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Shaterabadi Z, Nabiyouni G, Soleymani M. (2018). Physics responsible for heating efficiency and self-controlled temperature rise of magnetic nanoparticles in magnetic hyperthermia therapy. Prog Biophys Mol Biol 133:9–19. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Shetake N, Balla M, Kumar A, Pandey B. (2016). Magnetic hyperthermia therapy: an emerging modality of cancer treatment in combination with radiotherapy. J Radiat Cancer Res 7:13. [Google Scholar]
- Su YJ, Wang TT, Su YN, et al. (2020). A neutrophil membrane-functionalized black phosphorus riding inflammatory signal for positive feedback and multimode cancer therapy. Mater Horiz 7:574–85. [Google Scholar]
- Sun Y. (2016). Tumor microenvironment and cancer therapy resistance. Cancer Lett 380:205–15. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ta T, Bartolak-Suki E, Park E-J, et al. (2014). Localized delivery of doxorubicin in vivo from polymer-modified thermosensitive liposomes with MR-guided focused ultrasound-mediated heating. J Control Release 194:71–81. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ta T, Convertine AJ, Reyes CR, et al. (2010). Thermosensitive liposomes modified with poly(N-isopropylacrylamide-co-propylacrylic acid) copolymers for triggered release of doxorubicin. Biomacromolecules 11:1915–20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ta T, Porter TM. (2013). Thermosensitive liposomes for localized delivery and triggered release of chemotherapy. J Control Release 169:112–25. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Tarhan T, Tural B, Tural S. (2019). Synthesis and characterization of new branched magnetic nanocomposite for loading and release of topotecan anti-cancer drug. J Anal Sci Technol 10:1–13. [Google Scholar]
- Tiet P, Berlin JM. (2017). Exploiting homing abilities of cell carriers: targeted delivery of nanoparticles for cancer therapy. Biochem Pharmacol 145:18–26. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Tsuda M, Kitamasu K. (2019). Repair of trapped topoisomerase II covalent cleavage complexes: novel proteasome-independent mechanisms. Nucleosides Nucleotides Nucleic Acids 12:1–15. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Visser S, de Mol M, Cheung K, et al. (2018). Treatment satisfaction of patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer receiving platinum-based chemotherapy: results from a prospective cohort study (PERSONAL). Clin Lung Cancer 19:e503–e16. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wang X, Yan F, Liu X, et al. (2018). Enhanced drug delivery using sonoactivatable liposomes with membrane-embedded porphyrins. J Control Release 286:358–68. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Xing J, Qi X, Jiang Y, et al. (2015). Topotecan hydrochloride liposomes incorporated into thermosensitive hydrogel for sustained and efficient in situ therapy of H22 tumor in Kunming mice. Pharm Dev Technol 20:812–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Xu H, Pan Y. (2019). Experimental evaluation on the heating efficiency of magnetoferritin nanoparticles in an alternating magnetic field. Nanomaterials (Basel) 9:1457. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Yatvin MB, Weinstein JN, Dennis WH, Blumenthal R. (1978). Design of liposomes for enhanced local release of drugs by hyperthermia. Science 202:1290–3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Yuba E, Osaki T, Ono M, et al. (2018). Bleomycin-loaded pH-sensitive polymer–lipid-incorporated liposomes for cancer chemotherapy. Polymers 10:74. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zhang B, Wang TQ, Yang SM, et al. (2016). Development and evaluation of oxaliplatin and irinotecan co-loaded liposomes for enhanced colorectal cancer therapy. J Control Release 238:10–21. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zhang J, Chen Y, Li X, et al. (2016). The influence of different long-circulating materials on the pharmacokinetics of liposomal vincristine sulfate. Int J Nanomedicine 11:4187–97. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]