Skip to main content
Drug Delivery logoLink to Drug Delivery
. 2020 Jun 9;27(1):855–863. doi: 10.1080/10717544.2020.1775723

NIR triggered PLGA coated Au-TiO2 core loaded CPT-11 nanoparticles for human papillary thyroid carcinoma therapy

Tianyu Yu a,*, Lingling Tong b,*, Yu Ao c, Genmao Zhang d, Yunpeng Liu e, Hejia Zhang d,
PMCID: PMC8216437  PMID: 32515668

Abstract

MDR (multi-drug resistance) is one of the significant deterrents of effective chemotherapy for malignant growth. One of the powerful ways to deal with defeat of the MDR is to utilize inorganic nanoparticle-intervened tranquilize conveyance to build the medication aggregations in cancerous growth cells. In this work, we have developed the presentation that is accurately made of medication conveyance framework dependent on the TiO2 nanoparticles stacked CPT-11 to defeat the thyroid malignancy cells. The synthesized nanoparticles are characterized by spectroscopy methods (UV–vis, XPS, SEM, TEM, and DLS). The TEM results suggested that the shape of PLGA-Au-TiO2@CPT-11 of nanoparticles is ∼250 nm. After successful synthesis, we have evaluated the MTT of PLGA-Au-TiO2@CPT-11 nanoparticles with and without NIR radiations. Further, the morphological changes were observed using various biochemical stainings, such as acridine orange and ethidium bromide (AO–EB) and nuclear staining through Hoechst-33258. Also, migration and cell invasion were examined. The results show that these PLGA-Au-TiO2@CPT-11 and PLGA-Au-TiO2@CPT-11 + NIR nanoparticles exhibited promising antimetastatic property and reduced the cell invasion activity in B-CPAP and FTC-133 thyroid cancer cell lines. Based on the above findings, these PLGA-Au-TiO2@CPT-11 and PLGA-Au-TiO2@CPT-11 + NIR nanoparticles can be used as a promising candidate for the malignant thyroid cells.

Keywords: Au@TiO2, CPT-11, thyroid cancer, anti-metastasis

1. Introduction

Though traditionally used cancer treatment such as chemotherapy and anti-cancer drugs has increased the survival rate and rehabilitation of cancer patients, it has some severe side effects. Anti-cancer drugs are tending to kill both cancer and non-cancerous cells (Asghar & Meyer, 2012; Li et al., 2014; Santha Moorthy et al., 2017). As of late, nanomaterial-based helpful strategies, for example, photograph warm treatment (PTT), photodynamic therapy (PDT), and controlled medication conveyance framework have gone to the spotlight. PTT evacuates harmful cells or tissue with the assistance of exterior light incited hyperthermia. It has negligible harm to healthy tissues of the beneficiary, and is helpful, non-obtrusive, remote-controllable and is protected (Shi et al., 2013; Bucharskaya et al., 2016; Kim et al., 2018). Au nanoparticles (AuNPs), copper NPs, carbon subordinates, change metal sulfides, dark titania (TiO2), and dark phosphorus (BPs) are a portion of the photothermal specialists their properties have been investigated seriously (Song et al., 2011; Gao et al., 2012; Ghosh et al., 2017; Yang et al., 2017; Rawal & Patel, 2019). Due to their high retention capacity in the close infrared locale (NIR) and phenomenal biocompatibility, AuNPs are increasingly favored among them. Be that as it may, to be great PTT operators for AuNPs, the retention of their confined surface plasmon reverberation (LSPR) must be altered to the area of 550–900 nm to permit the NIR laser treatment. This could be accomplished via cautiously observing AuNPs size and shape; however, it was hard to blend the material (Jana et al., 2001; Jana, 2005; Rao et al., 2017). Then again, the LSPR coupling was recommended as a novel methodology 15 among AuNPs and semiconductor. We find that the TiO2 shell altered with AuNPs is one of the best strategies for moving the assimilation of LSPR to a more drawn out wavelength. Inside the sub-wavelength areas contiguous with the AuNPs layer, the compacted free-space optical field permits significant electric field upgrade under full excitation, which improves the exhibition of photothermal transformation (Williams et al., 2008; Akhavan & Ghaderi, 2009; Lai et al., 2018; Kazimirova et al., 2019).

CPT-11 (irinotecan) has been used to treat various types of cancer, such as leukemia, lung, breast, belly, vaginal sarcoma, and soft tissue sarcoma. CPT-11 intercalates between base pairs of DNA and locates the double helix in the lower groove (Chen et al., 2019; Fakiha et al., 2019; Fan et al., 2019; Si et al., 2019). CPT-11 intercalation blocks the development of the enzyme topoisomerase II, which winds DNA for transcription. To alleviate CPT-11 systemic toxicity due to its traditional delivery, it has been encapsulated in PEGylated liposomes to make it more targeted for tumor. Due to its central anthracycline chromophore group, CPT-11 is inherently fluorescent. CPT-11 accumulation in tissue or cells can, therefore, be observed in the visible range under fluorescence imaging systems (Kido et al., 2017; Hu et al., 2018; Kon et al., 2018; Liu & Liu, 2018). Nevertheless, absorption and interaction in emissions between CPT-11 and biological chromophores, such as hemoglobin, oxyhemoglobin, and melanin, hamper the efficacy of CPT-11 as an imaging agent for tumor detection and monitoring, especially in vivo (Bai et al., 2019; Liu et al., 2019; Malhotra et al., 2019; Ouyang et al., 2019; Song et al., 2019). This is the vital reason that other imaging devices, such as those with near-infrared (NIR) capability, should be used to track tumor location and CPT-11 treatment response. The present study documented a new, multifunctional CPT-11-loaded, PLGA-grafted Au@TiO2 core–shell NPs to PLGA-Au@TiO2@CPT-11 capable of selectively targeting and removing cancer cells by NIR-induced cancer therapy (Scheme 1(B)).

Scheme 1.

Scheme 1.

Graphic design of the preparation process of the (A) Au@TiO2 core and PLGA-Au-TiO2@CPT-11. (B) Schematic depiction of PLGA-Au-TiO2@CPT-11 with NIR irradiation showing potential chemotherapy effect.

2. Experimental

The detailed synthetic procedures are depicted in Scheme 1(A).

2.1. Cell culture

Thyroid cancer cell lines B-CPAP and FTC-133 have been collected from the Department of Thoracic Surgery, the First Hospital of Jilin University, PR China. B-CPAP and NIH 3T3 cells are cultured in RPMI 1640 medium (Cell Signalling, Shanghai, China) and FTC-133 cancer cells are cultured in DMEM medium complemented by 10% fetal bovine serum (Cell Signalling, Shanghai, China), penicillin and 100 μg/mL streptomycin as antibiotics (Cell Signalling, Shanghai, China) in 96 well-grown were incubated under a humid atmosphere of 5% CO2 at 37 °C.

2.2. MTT assay

The MTT (3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide) test was conducted according to previously reported procedures. PLGA-Au-TiO2@CPT-11 and PLGA-Au-TiO2@CPT-11 + NIR in a concentration range of 0–25 μg/mL soluble in DMSO were applied to wells 24 h after 3 × 103 cells per well in a fresh culture medium of 200 μL. The DMSO was used as vehicle control. The percentage of cell inhibition by gold nanoparticles was calculated and plotted in the graph by using GraphPad Prism software (La Jolla, CA).

2.3. Dual (AO–EB) staining

Apoptotic morphological changes upon treatment with IC50 concentration of PLGA-Au-TiO2@CPT-11 and PLGA-Au-TiO2@CPT-11 + NIR nanoparticles against cancer B-CPAP and FTC-133 cell lines were measured by using acridine orange and ethidium bromide (AO/EB) and Hoechst 33344 staining. After staining, the cells were visualized under a fluorescence microscope (Accu Scope EXI-310) at ×20 magnification (Subarkhan & Ramesh, 2016; Mohamed Kasim et al., 2018).

2.4. Wound healing assay

After 24 h at 37 °C, B-CPAP and FTC-133 cells are extended to 90% juncture in a six-well dish. A scratch over the cell monolayer was delivered utilizing a clean 10 μL pipette tip. Following treatment with PLGA-Au-TiO2@CPT-11 and PLGA-Au-TiO2@CPT-11 + NIR (IC50 concentration, individually) and 0.1% DMSO as control cells, wound pictures are gathered by optical microscopy at time0 in the wake of scratching and toward the finish of a 24-hour brooding period. To quantify the movement rate, the separation between the first twisted and the separation between the mending wound and the pipet tip at 24 h after scratching was thought about (Mohamed Subarkhan et al., 2019). The wound area was examined through the Image J software (Bethesda, MD).

2.5. Cell invasion assay

Matrigel framework (BD Biosciences, Franklin Lakes, NJ) was placed in Transwell channels (30 μL/well, 8.0 μm PET, Millipore, Billerica, MA) and permitted to finish gelling for 1 h at 37 °C. A limit of 200 μL of RPMI-1640 and DMEM medium containing 4 × 104 B-CPAP and FTC-133 cells were added to the upper chambers and 700 μL of RPMI-1640 medium with 10% FBS was added to the lower chambers. In this way, the wells in the upper chambers are taken care of with PLGA-Au-TiO2@CPT-11 and PLGA-Au-TiO2@CPT-11 + NIR (IC50 concentration, individually) at 37 °C for 24 h. Following 24 h of brooding, cotton swabs were utilized to scratch the Matrigel and the cells that stayed in the upper chambers. Next, the B-CPAP and FTC-133 cells on the base surface of the layer were fixed with methanol for 10 min and recolored with 0.5% purple precious stone for 15 min. Intrusive cells on the film were washed with distilled water and shot under an optical magnifying lens. Cells have been included in any event three irregular infinitesimal fields (amplification ×200). The examinations were rehashed multiple times (Gialeli et al., 2011; Zou et al., 2016; Mahkamova et al., 2019). The invaded cells were examined through the Image J software (Bethesda, MD).

3. Results and discussion

3.1. Synthesis and structural illustration of PLGA-Au-TiO2@CPT-11

The PLGA-Au-TiO2@CPT-11 and PLGA-Au-TiO2@CPT-11 + NIR were prepared with some alteration in compliance with previous methods. Scheme 1(A) displays the overall synthetic process.

The infrared spectroscopy investigations are used to evaluate the coordination modes of the nanoparticles (Figure 1(A)). The UV–vis displays the significant peaks, that show 3417.68 and 1567 C=O, and C=N frequencies are indicating the formation of conjugate of the PLGA. The free PLGA-Au-TiO2@CPT-11 does not show the transmittance in UV–vis spectroscopy. These results clearly indicate the formation of the PLGA-Au-TiO2@CPT-11. The elemental mapping analysis is used to describe PLGA-Au-TiO2@CPT-11 functionalization. Figure 1(B) displays the unvarying composition of elements (Au, Ti, and O). The mapping of Ti elements was based on the TiO2 surface and the mapping of Au elements, indicating the presence of AuNPs. The nitrogen physicochemical properties were also examined by the PLGA-Au-TiO2@CPT-11. Figure 1(C) shows the N2 adsorption and desorption isotherms and core size of the samples. The PLGA-Au-TiO2@CPT-11 shows well defined hysteresis loop, displays well-built appearances. The average diameter displays average diameter pore size 9.02 nm, indicates that active sites and passage for CPT-11 into the core–shell. PLGA-Au-TiO2@CPT-11 core–shell NPs have been studied by electron microscopy SEM and TEM transmission. The SEM image is shown in Figure 1(D). It shows large core volumes and high specific surface areas, which absorb a large amount of CPT-11 accumulations. Figure 1(E) displays descriptions of PLGA-Au-TiO2@CPT-11 with high-resolution TEM (HR-TEM). The darker spots were the Au core due to the disparity masses of Au and Ti, while the lighter area was shells of TiO2. It should be remembered that Au-NPs were enclosed by a layer of TiO2 surface. In fact, the resonating gap in each nanohybrid between the center and the core might be undoubtedly noticed. The PLGA-Au-TiO2@CPT-11 NPs displayed a unvarying 200 nm width. The findings of dynamic light scattering (DLS) showed that PLGA-Au-TiO2@CPT-11 core–shell nanoparticles average hydrodynamic particle size was 233.5 ± 69.3 (Figure 1(F)), showing highly stable in DD water without forming any aggregation. An HR-TEM photo showed the polycrystalline core of TiO2 with numerous minor and arbitrarily focused crystallization (Shen et al., 2011; Llinàs et al., 2018; Tambe et al., 2018).

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Physicochemical characteristics of functionalized Au-TiO2@CPT-11 and PLGA-Au-TiO2@CPT-11. (A) IR spectrum of Au-TiO2@CPT-11 and PLGA-Au-TiO2@CPT-11. (B) XPS analysis of PLGA-Au-TiO2@CPT-11. (C) N2 adsorption/desorption isotherms. (D) SEM image of PLGA-Au-TiO2@CPT-11. Scale bar 200 nm. (E) TEM images and size distributions and the scale bar 200 nm. (F) DLS of the size distribution of PLGA-Au-TiO2@CPT-11.

3.2. In vitro cytotoxicity

The MTT assay was used to make a preliminary assessment of the growth-inhibiting action of PLGA-Au-TiO2@CPT-11 and PLGA-Au-TiO2@CPT-11 + NIR in B-CPAP and FTC-133 thyroid cancer cell lines to determine the respective IC50 values at the individual time points (Yu et al., 2016; Kim et al., 2018; Mahkamova et al., 2019). With varying concentrations of PLGA-Au-TiO2@CPT-11 and PLGA-Au-TiO2@CPT-11 + NIR, the cells have been treated for 24 hours. It exhibited a significant dose-dependent inhibition of growth. As shown in Figure 2, PLGA-Au-TiO2@CPT-11 and PLGA-Au-TiO2@CPT-11 + NIR induced a marked decrease in cell growth with IC50 values of 8.98 and 4.90 µM for B-CPAP cells and 8.52 and 2.31 µM for FTC-133 cells at 24 h, respectively. Hence, they treated PLGA-Au-TiO2@CPT-11 and PLGA-Au-TiO2@CPT-11 + NIR cells at the IC50 concentration in all subsequent studies, unless otherwise specified. Further, we examined the non-cancerous NIH-3T3 cells with the fabricated nanoparticles, PLGA-Au-TiO2@CPT-11 and PLGA-Au-TiO2@CPT-11 + NIR exhibited the high cytotoxicity in NIH3T3 cells (Figure 2). These results thus evidenced the advantages of the PLGA-Au-TiO2@CPT-11 and PLGA-Au-TiO2@CPT-11 + NIR as cancer-selective agents, and they should have the potential to reduce the toxicity to healthy cells and organs when considering the in vivo use.

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

In vitro cytotoxicity of B-CPAP and FTC-133 thyroid cancer cell lines with NIH3T3 non-cancerous cell lines.

3.3. Morphological assessment

By using a fluorescent microscopic analysis of the AO–EB and Hoechst33258-stained in B-CPAP and FTC-133 thyroid cancer cell lines, characteristic morphological changes induced by PLGA-Au-TiO2@CPT-11 and PLGA-Au-TiO2@CPT-11 + NIR were evaluated (Figure 3). The nanoparticle induces cell death via two pathways, such as apoptosis and necrosis, after treatment with their IC50 meditations at 24 hours. Ironically, PLGA-Au-TiO2@CPT-11 + NIR shows a higher percentage of the apoptotic mode of cell death than PLGA-Au-TiO2@CPT-11.

Figure 3.

Figure 3.

Dual AO/EB fluorescent staining of B-CPAP and FTC-133 thyroid cancer cell lines after treatment with PLGA-Au-TiO2@CPT-11 and PLGA-Au-TiO2@CPT-11 + NIR (IC50 concentration) for 24 h.

Once Hoechst-33258 staining is used, chromatin fragmentation, bi- and/or multinucleation, cytoplasmic vacuolation, nuclear swelling, cytoplasmic bleating, and late apoptosis suggestion of dot-like chromatin condensation are detected on thyroid cancer cells morphological change (Kasibhatla et al., 2006; Pang et al., 2013; Liu et al., 2015; Mohamed Subarkhan et al., 2016). The observed cytological changes are secreted into four sorts rendering to the emission of fluorescence and the morphological characteristics of chromatin condensation in the AO–EB stained nucleus: (i) live cells with consistently green fluorescent nucleus with an extremely structured structure; (ii) early apoptotic cells (which still have intact membranes but have begun to undergo DNA fragmentation) with green fluorescent nodes, but peri-nuclear chromatin nuclear chromatin condensation is visible as bright green patches or fragments; (iii) late apoptotic cells with orange to red fluorescent nodes with condensed or fragmented chromatin; (iv) necrotic cells swollen to enormous sizes, with uniformly orange to the red fluorescent nucleus with no sign of chromatin fragmentation. All these morphological modifications suggest that the thyroid cancer cells undergo apoptosis mode of cell death over the treatment of 24 hours (Figure 4). It has been stated that the anti-cancer action of certain PLGA-Au-TiO2@CPT-11 and PLGA-Au-TiO2@CPT-11 + NIR depends on their interaction with different proteins and their modes of binding to duplex DNA, full binding of plasma proteins may result in drastic alterations or even loss of the biological properties of PLGA-Au-TiO2@CPT-11 and PLGA-Au-TiO2@CPT-11 + NIR nanoparticles.

Figure 4.

Figure 4.

Nuclear staining of B-CPAP and FTC-133 thyroid cancer cell lines after treatment with PLGA-Au-TiO2@CPT-11 and PLGA-Au-TiO2@CPT-11 + NIR (IC50 concentration) for 24 h.

3.4. Migration and cell invasion assay

Metastasis and invasion are significant occurrences in the future period of cancer development. For successful cancer treatment, metastatic suppression and invasion are essential (Jin et al., 2012; Zhu et al., 2016; Guo et al., 2017). Cell proliferation happens through biological procedures, which play a vital role in the development of numerous sicknesses, including thyroid cancer. In vitro migration assays are necessary for understanding the mechanism of cell migration and for recognizing the inhibitory potential of PLGA-Au-TiO2@CPT-11 and PLGA-Au-TiO2@CPT-11 + NIR at IC50 concentration in B-CPAP and FTC-133 thyroid cancer cell lines (Figure 5).

Figure 5.

Figure 5.

(A, C) The migration of B-CPAP and FTC-133 thyroid cancer cell lines was detected by a scratch assay. The B-CPAP and FTC-133 cells were treated with PLGA-Au-TiO2@CPT-11 and PLGA-Au-TiO2@CPT-11 + NIR (IC50 concentration) for 24 h. (B, D) Quantification analysis showed that PLGA-Au-TiO2@CPT-11 and PLGA-Au-TiO2@CPT-11 + NIR reduced B-CPAP and FTC-133 migration.

In B-CPAP and FTC-133 thyroid cancer cell lines, migration after treatment with PLGA-Au-TiO2@CPT-11 and PLGA-Au-TiO2@CPT-11 + NIR decreased significantly to IC50 concentration which was substantially less active. For instance, the wound closure ratios are 18.8%, 23.3%, and 42.3% respectively for PLGA-Au-TiO2@CPT-11 and PLGA-Au-TiO2@CPT-11 + NIR. Furthermore, during cancer development, active anti-cancer medications must be able to prevent the migration of cancer cells from main places to other tissues in malignancy candidates. Hence, the transwell assay then tested the invasiveness of cancer cells (Forner et al., 2012; Jin et al., 2012; Ni et al., 2017). Invasive B-CPAP and FTC-133 cells are sowed on matrigel coated tissue and preserved for 24 h with PLGA-Au-TiO2@CPT-11 and PLGA-Au-TiO2@CPT-11 + NIR (IC50 concentration, respectively). During therapy with PLGA-Au-TiO2@CPT-11 and PLGA-Au-TiO2@CPT-11 + NIR, the number of invading cells decreased significantly relative to untreated cells (Figure 6). Based on these findings, delivery indicate that, in addition to in vitro cytotoxic activity, these PLGA-Au-TiO2@CPT-11 and PLGA-Au-TiO2@CPT-11 + NIR nanoparticles can suppress metastases and the invasion of B-CPAP and FTC-133 thyroid cancer cells.

Figure 6.

Figure 6.

(A, B) The invasion of B-CPAP and FTC-133 thyroid cancer cells was detected via transwell techniques. B-CPAP and FTC-133 cells were treated with PLGA-Au-TiO2@CPT-11 and PLGA-Au-TiO2@CPT-11 + NIR for 24 h. (C, D) The number of invading thyroid cancer cells upon treatment with nanoparticles was remarkably decreased compared with that of the control cells.

4. Conclusions

In conclusion, we have successfully designed and demonstrated the Au@TiO2 loaded with CPT-11 for the treatment of thyroid cancer cells. The results of PLGA-Au-TiO2@CPT-11 nanoparticles were characterized through the various spectroscopy methods (UV–vis, XPS, SEM, TEM, and DLS). The SEM and TEM results suggested that the shapes of PLGA-Au-TiO2@CPT-11 nanoparticles are well organized and shaped. After positive synthesis, we have evaluated the MTT of PLGA-Au-TiO2@CPT-11 nanoparticles with and without NIR radiations. Further, the morphological changes were observed using AO–EB and Hoechst-33258 staining. The results show these PLGA-Au-TiO2@CPT-11 and PLGA-Au-TiO2@CPT-11 + NIR nanoparticles exhibited promising antimetastatic property and reduced the cell invasion activity in FTC-133 and B-CPAP thyroid cancer cell lines. The findings of PLGA-Au-TiO2@CPT-11 and PLGA-Au-TiO2@CPT-11 + NIR nanoparticles would invent the probable use in thyroid patents with improved therapeutic and future clinical investigation.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).

References

  1. Akhavan O, Ghaderi E. (2009). Photocatalytic reduction of graphene oxide nanosheets on TiO2 thin film for photoinactivation of bacteria in solar light irradiation. J Phys Chem C 113:20214–20. [Google Scholar]
  2. Asghar U, Meyer T. (2012). Are there opportunities for chemotherapy in the treatment of hepatocellular cancer? J Hepatol 56:686–95. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bai S, Ma X, Shi X, et al. (2019). Smart unimolecular micelle-based polyprodrug with dual-redox stimuli response for tumor microenvironment: enhanced in vivo delivery efficiency and tumor penetration. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 11:36130–40. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Bucharskaya A, Maslyakova G, Terentyuk G, et al. (2016). Towards effective photothermal/photodynamic treatment using plasmonic gold nanoparticles. Int J Mol Sci 17:1295. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Chen M-C, Baskaran R, Lee N-H, et al. (2019). CXCL2/CXCR2 axis induces cancer stem cell characteristics in CPT-11-resistant LoVo colon cancer cells via Gαi-2 and Gαq/11. J Cell Physiol 234:11822–34. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Fakiha K, Coller JK, Logan RM, et al. (2019). Amitriptyline prevents CPT-11-induced early-onset diarrhea and colonic apoptosis without reducing overall gastrointestinal damage in a rat model of mucositis. Support Care Cancer 27:2313–20. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Fan Y, Mansoor N, Ahmad T, et al. (2019). Enzyme and transporter kinetics for CPT-11 (irinotecan) and SN-38: an insight on tumor tissue compartment pharmacokinetics using PBPK. Recent Pat Anticancer Drug Discov 14:177–86. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Forner A, Llovet JM, Bruix J. (2012). Hepatocellular carcinoma. Lancet 379:1245–55. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Gao C, Lu Z, Liu Y, et al. (2012). Highly stable silver nanoplates for surface plasmon resonance biosensing. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl 51:5629–33. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Ghosh AB, Saha N, Sarkar A, et al. (2017). Observation of enhanced photocurrent response in M–CuInS2 (M = Au, Ag) heteronanostructures: phase selective synthesis and application. New J Chem 41:692–701. [Google Scholar]
  11. Gialeli C, Theocharis AD, Karamanos NK. (2011). Roles of matrix metalloproteinases in cancer progression and their pharmacological targeting. FEBS J 278:16–27. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Guo M, Li Y, Lin Z, et al. (2017). Surface decoration of selenium nanoparticles with curcumin induced HepG2 cell apoptosis through ROS mediated p53 and AKT signaling pathways. RSC Adv 7:52456–64. [Google Scholar]
  13. Hu T, Liu C, Li Q, et al. (2018). Apatinib + CPT-11 + S-1 for treatment of refractory brain metastases in patient with triple-negative breast cancer: case report and literature review. Medicine (Baltimore) 97:e0349. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Jana NR, Gearheart L, Murphy CJ. (2001). Seed-mediated growth approach for shape-controlled synthesis of spheroidal and rod-like gold nanoparticles using a surfactant template. Adv Mater 13:1389–93. [Google Scholar]
  15. Jana NR. (2005). Gram-scale synthesis of soluble, near-monodisperse gold nanorods and other anisotropic nanoparticles. Small 1:875–82. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Jin H, Yu Y, Chrisler WB, et al. (2012). Delivery of MicroRNA-10b with polylysine nanoparticles for inhibition of breast cancer cell wound healing. Breast Cancer (Auckl) 6:9–19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Kasibhatla S, Amarante-Mendes GP, Finucane D, et al. (2006). Acridine orange/ethidium bromide (AO/EB) staining to detect apoptosis. CSH Protoc 2006:799–803. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Kazimirova A, Baranokova M, Staruchova M, et al. (2019). Titanium dioxide nanoparticles tested for genotoxicity with the comet and micronucleus assays in vitro, ex vivo and in vivo. Mutat Res Toxicol Environ Mutagen 843:57–65. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Kido T, Morimoto Y, Toda H, et al. (2017). A case of locally advanced neuroendocrine carcinoma of the stomach could be curably resected after chemotherapy with CPT-11/CDDP. Gan Kagaku Ryoho 44:1532–4. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Kim H, Kim SW, Seok KH, et al. (2018). Hypericin-assisted photodynamic therapy against anaplastic thyroid cancer. Photodiagn Photodyn Ther 24:15–21. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Kon R, Tsubota Y, Minami M, et al. (2018). CPT-11-induced delayed diarrhea develops via reduced aquaporin-3 expression in the colon. Int J Mol Sci 19:170. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Lai M, Jin Z, Yan M, et al. (2018). The controlled naringin release from TiO2 nanotubes to regulate osteoblast differentiation. J Biomater Appl 33:673–80. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Li X, Takashima M, Yuba E, et al. (2014). PEGylated PAMAM dendrimer–doxorubicin conjugate-hybridized gold nanorod for combined photothermal-chemotherapy. Biomaterials 35:6576–84. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Liu J, Li F, Zheng J, et al. (2019). Redox/NIR dual-responsive MoS2 for synergetic chemo-photothermal therapy of cancer. J Nanobiotechnol 17:78. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Liu K, Liu P, Liu R, Wu X. (2015). Dual AO/EB staining to detect apoptosis in osteosarcoma cells compared with flow cytometry. Med Sci Monit Basic Res 21:15–20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Liu S, Liu B. (2018). Overexpression of nitrogen permease regulator like-2 (NPRL2) enhances sensitivity to irinotecan (CPT-11) in colon cancer cells by activating the DNA damage checkpoint pathway. Med Sci Monit 24:1424–33. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Llinàs MC, Martínez-Edo G, Cascante A, et al. (2018). Preparation of a mesoporous silica-based nano-vehicle for dual DOX/CPT pH-triggered delivery. Drug Deliv 25:1137–46. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Mahkamova K, Latar NM, Aspinall S, Meeson A. (2019). Side population cells in anaplastic thyroid cancer and normal thyroid. Exp Cell Res 374:104–13. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Malhotra S, Dumoga S, Sirohi P, Singh N. (2019). Red blood cells-derived vesicles for delivery of lipophilic drug camptothecin. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 11:22141–51. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Mohamed Kasim MS, Sundar S, Rengan R. (2018). Synthesis and structure of new binuclear ruthenium(II) arene benzil bis(benzoylhydrazone) complexes: investigation on antiproliferative activity and apoptosis induction. Inorg Chem Front 5:585–96. [Google Scholar]
  31. Mohamed Subarkhan M, Prabhu RN, Raj Kumar R, Ramesh R. (2016). Antiproliferative activity of cationic and neutral thiosemicarbazone copper(II) complexes. RSC Adv 6:25082–93. [Google Scholar]
  32. Mohamed Subarkhan MK, Ren L, Xie B, et al. (2019). Novel tetranuclear ruthenium(II) arene complexes showing potent cytotoxic and antimetastatic activity as well as low toxicity in vivo. Eur J Med Chem 179:246–56. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Ni D, Bu W, Ehlerding EB, et al. (2017). Engineering of inorganic nanoparticles as magnetic resonance imaging contrast agents. Chem Soc Rev 46:7438–68. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Ouyang M, Luo Z, Zhang W, et al. (2019). Protective effect of curcumin against irinotecan-induced intestinal mucosal injury via attenuation of NF-κB activation, oxidative stress and endoplasmic reticulum stress. Int J Oncol 54:1376–86. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Pang X-L, He G, Liu Y-B, et al. (2013). Endoplasmic reticulum stress sensitizes human esophageal cancer cell to radiation. World J Gastroenterol 19:1736–48. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Rao K, Imran M, Jabri T, et al. (2017). Gum tragacanth stabilized green gold nanoparticles as cargos for Naringin loading: a morphological investigation through AFM. Carbohydr Polym 174:243–52. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Rawal S, Patel MM. (2019). Threatening cancer with nanoparticle aided combination oncotherapy. J Control Release 301:76–109. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Santha Moorthy M, Subramanian B, Panchanathan M, et al. (2017). Fucoidan-coated core–shell magnetic mesoporous silica nanoparticles for chemotherapy and magnetic hyperthermia-based thermal therapy applications. New J Chem 41:15334–46. [Google Scholar]
  39. Shen J, He Q, Gao Y, et al. (2011). Mesoporous silica nanoparticles loading doxorubicin reverse multidrug resistance: performance and mechanism. Nanoscale 3:4314–22. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Shi S, Zhu X, Zhao Z, et al. (2013). Photothermally enhanced photodynamic therapy based on mesoporous Pd@Ag@mSiO2 nanocarriers. J Mater Chem B 1:1133–41. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Si J, Zhao X, Gao S, et al. (2019). Advances in delivery of Irinotecan (CPT-11) active metabolite 7-ethyl-10-hydroxycamptothecin. Int J Pharm 568:118499. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Song D, Beringhs AO, Zhuang Z, et al. (2019). Overcoming hypoxia-induced chemoresistance to cisplatin through tumor oxygenation monitored by optical imaging. Nanotheranostics 3:223–35. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Song Y, Wei W, Qu X. (2011). Colorimetric biosensing using smart materials. Adv Mater Weinheim 23:4215–36. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Subarkhan MKM, Ramesh R. (2016). Ruthenium(II) arene complexes containing benzhydrazone ligands: synthesis, structure and antiproliferative activity. Inorg Chem Front 3:1245–55. [Google Scholar]
  45. Tambe P, Kumar P, Paknikar KM, Gajbhiye V. (2018). Decapeptide functionalized targeted mesoporous silica nanoparticles with doxorubicin exhibit enhanced apoptotic effect in breast and prostate cancer cells. Int J Nanomedicine 13:7669–80. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Williams G, Seger B, Kamat PV. (2008). TiO2-graphene nanocomposites. UV-assisted photocatalytic reduction of graphene oxide. ACS Nano 2:1487–91. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Yang X, Xiong J, Qiu P, et al. (2017). Synthesis of a core/satellite-like multifunctional nanocarrier for pH- and NIR-triggered intracellular chemothermal therapy and tumor imaging. RSC Adv 7:7742–52. [Google Scholar]
  48. Yu W, Cao XL, Xu G, et al. (2016). Potential role for carbon nanoparticles to guide central neck dissection in patients with papillary thyroid cancer. Surgery 160:755–61. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Zhu Z, Wang Z, Hao Y, et al. (2016). Glutathione boosting the cytotoxicity of a magnetic platinum(IV) nano-prodrug in tumor cells. Chem Sci 7:2864–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Zou L, Wang H, He B, et al. (2016). Current approaches of photothermal therapy in treating cancer metastasis with nanotherapeutics. Theranostics 6:762–72. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Drug Delivery are provided here courtesy of Taylor & Francis

RESOURCES