Abstract
The role of the cerebellum in controlling the cough motor pattern is not well understood. We hypothesized that cerebellectomy would disinhibit motor drive to respiratory muscles during cough. Cough was induced by mechanical stimulation of the tracheobronchial airways in anesthetized, spontaneously breathing adult cats (8 male, 1 female), and electromyograms (EMGs) were recorded from upper airway, chest wall, and abdominal respiratory muscles. Cough trials were performed before and at two time points after total cerebellectomy (10 minutes and >1 hour). Unlike a prior report in paralyzed, decerebrated, and artificially ventilated animals, we observed that cerebellectomy had no effect on cough frequency. After cerebellectomy, thoracic inspiratory muscle EMG magnitudes increased during cough (diaphragm EMG increased by 14% at 10 minutes, p = 0.04; parasternal by 34% at 10 minutes and by 32% at >1 hour, p = 0.001 and 0.03 respectively). During cough at 10 minutes after cerebellectomy, inspiratory esophageal pressure was increased by 44% (p = 0.004), thyroarytenoid (laryngeal adductor) muscle EMG amplitude increased 13% (p = 0.04), and no change was observed in the posterior cricoarytenoid (laryngeal abductor) EMG. Cough phase durations did not change. Blood pressure and heart rate were reduced after cerebellectomy, and respiratory rate also decreased due to an increase in duration of the expiratory phase of breathing. Changes in cough-related EMG magnitudes of respiratory muscles suggest that the cerebellum exerts inhibitory control of cough motor drive, but not cough number or phase timing in response to mechanical stimuli in this model early after cerebellectomy. However, results varied widely at >1 hour after cerebellectomy, with some animals exhibiting enhancement or suppression of one or more components of the cough motor behavior. These results suggest that, while the cerebellum and behavior-related sensory feedback regulate cough, it may be difficult to predict the nature of the modulation based on total cerebellectomy.
Introduction
Cough is vital to maintain a clear airway and a functional respiratory system. It is elicited through mechanical and a variety of chemical stimuli applied to the airways including capsaicin and other TRPV1 agonists, acids, bradykinin, and histamine [1,2]. Aδ fibers transmit information related to punctate mechanical stimuli and acids, via the recurrent laryngeal and superior laryngeal branches of the vagus nerve, and terminate in the nucleus of the solitary tract (NTS), where they synapse on second-order interneurons [3,4]. These second order neurons then synapse with various respiratory areas in the brainstem, including the ventral respiratory group, retrotrapezoid nucleus/parafacial respiratory group, midline raphé, nucleus ambiguus, and pontine respiratory group [5–7]. While cough is elicited by vagal pathways, preliminary evidence suggests that other afferent feedback and/or input from areas of the brain responsible for movement coordination could play a key role [8,9].
Current theories of the cerebellum suggest that motor learning is required to create appropriate internal models under varying proprioceptive and exteroceptive states [10]. In locomotion, it is classically understood that sensory feedback arising from muscles spindles and Golgi tendon organs via spinocerebellar pathways [11] is vital to generating these internal models [12–14]. For upper airway behaviors, afferent information from the larynx and tracheobronchial tree is represented in the cerebellum [15,16], and perturbation of cerebellar regions can modify breathing, presumably through synaptic connections with the respiratory control network (RCN) [17–19]. For example, Glasser et al. [17] demonstrated that removal of the cerebellum inhibited breathing. More recently, Xu and Frasier [18] demonstrated that electrical stimulation of the fastigial nucleus modulated respiratory phase timing, and that cerebellar ablation attenuated the hypoxic ventilatory response.
The role of the cerebellum in airway protection is not wholly understood. Only one previous study has investigated the effects of cerebellectomy on cough in decerebrate cats [20]. Removal of the cerebellum reduced cough number and expiratory drive with no significant changes in inspiratory activity. However, a paralytic agent was used that would have resulted in little or no phasic somatic afferent feedback during coughing, likely confounding the effect of cerebellectomy. There is also a case report [21] of cerebellar ataxia increasing cough excitability, leading to cough-related syncope.
To further investigate the influence of cerebellectomy on cough, we examined the effect of cerebellectomy on cough motor drive in anesthetized and unparalyzed animals. We hypothesized that, when retaining sensory feedback, cough motor drive would increase after cerebellectomy. This would contrast the results of Xu and colleagues [20], likely resulting from disinhibition of central cough pathways.
Methods
Experiments were performed on 9 spontaneously breathing adult cats (8 male, 1 female), with an average weight of 5.2 kg (standard deviation = 0.7 kg). The protocol was approved by the University of Florida Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC). Anesthesia was initially induced with sevoflurane (4.5%), then the animals were weaned onto sodium pentobarbital (25 mg/kg, i.v.). Based on forelimb withdrawal reflex and jaw tone, supplemental doses were given as needed in 0.1–0.3 mL i.v. boluses. A single dose of atropine sulfate (0.054 mg/kg, i.v.) was given at the beginning of surgery to minimize airway secretions. The femoral vein and artery were cannulated to deliver drugs and record blood pressure, respectively. Arterial blood pressure and end-tidal CO2 were continuously recorded, and arterial blood gas samples were obtained every hour. Body temperature was maintained at 37.5 ± 0.5°C with a homeothermic pad and rectal temperature probe.
Animals were tracheostomized and a bifurcated tracheostomy tube was placed to permit simultaneous end tidal gas recording and mechanical stimulation of the tracheobronchial airway to elicit coughing. Bipolar fine wire electromyograms (EMGs) were placed intramuscularly to record respiratory related behaviors using the method of Basmajian and Stecko [22]. EMGs from the sternocostal diaphragm (dorsal to the xiphoid process), bilateral parasternal, bilateral internal abdominal oblique, thyroarytenoid, and posterior cricoarytenoid (PCA) muscles were evaluated during cough and breathing. EMG signals were amplified using Grass P511 amplifiers and band-pass filtered (300–10,000 Hz) before being digitized with Spike 2 version 9 (Cambridge Electronic Design; United Kingdom). EMG channels were rectified and smoothed with a 50 ms time constant prior to analysis. A lead II electrocardiogram (ECG) was also placed on the animal [23], similarly amplified and digitized, with a band pass filter set to 3-3000Hz. Esophageal pressure was measured via a small balloon inserted through the mouth into the midthoracic esophagus. EMG and ECG signals were sampled at 25,000 Hz and pressure signals at 500 Hz.
Cough was stimulated via a flexible plastic cannula inserted into the tracheal tube. Mechanical stimulation of the intrathoracic trachea was accomplished by inserting and rotating this cannula at approximately 2 Hz for periods of 10–15 seconds. In the control period prior to cerebellectomy, an adaptation protocol consisting of 20 sequential mechanical stimulation trials was conducted, separated by ~1 minute [24]. Following this protocol, the cough response remains stable for several hours in this preparation.
A 1% lidocaine solution was injected into the external auditory canals to locally block the auricular nerves prior to placing the animal in a stereotaxic head stage. All coughs were stimulated while the animal was in the stereotaxic frame. After control coughs were recorded, a craniotomy was performed, and the cerebellum was removed by aspiration. The surface of the brainstem was covered with mineral oil. Post cerebellectomy cough trials were performed >1 hour after cerebellectomy with a subset of 5 animals also subject to 10 minute post-cerebellectomy trials. Tracheobronchial cough elicited after a period of rest often results in the initial trial being unrepresentative of subsequent trials, typically resulting in a more subdued response. For this reason, three trials were performed at each timepoint with a 60 second intertrial interval, and the first trial was omitted for analysis purposes.
Cough was confirmed by observing sequential and large ballistic-like EMG bursting patterns in inspiratory muscles, thyroarytenoid, and the internal abdominal obliques [25–27] and rapidly rising inspiratory and expiratory esophageal pressure changes that were much larger than those observed during eupneic breathing (Fig 1). Animals were euthanized via an i.v. overdose of sodium pentobarbital and, upon cessation of respiratory activity, a 3 cc bolus of saturated potassium chloride. Euthanasia was confirmed with a 5 minute absence of cardiac activity.
The inspiratory (CTI) phase of cough was defined as the period from the onset to the peak of activity of the diaphragm EMG. The active expiration component (CTE1) began when the inspiratory phase ended and lasted until the ballistic activity on the internal abdominal oblique EMG subsided. The passive expiration (CTE2) lasted from the end of the CTE1 phase until the onset of the inspiratory phase of the following cough. Similar phase timings were recorded for the eupneic period of breathing that preceded the cough stimulus. This period consisted of the four breaths preceding a cough trial. The inspiratory (TI) and expiratory (TE) phases of breathing were measured using the presence (TI) or absence (TE) of activity on the diaphragm EMG. The total cycle time (TTOT) measured the duration of one breath by adding TI to TE. During this period, cardiovascular parameters were also measured. Heart rate was measured using the interval between R peaks on the ECG [23]. Systolic, diastolic, pulse, and mean arterial pressures were measured per beat. The data collected during this period was aggregated for each condition in each animal.
Cough and breathing related EMG magnitudes were normalized as a percent of the maximum for each muscle in each animal. Coughs that occurred with additional airway protective behaviors (i.e., swallow) were excluded from this analysis. Additionally, any cough generating an esophageal pressure less than 10% of that epoch’s maximum was excluded. A mean ± standard deviation was calculated for each animal, and then averaged for each condition across animals. Conditions were compared using a Linear Mixed Effects Model. All hypothesis testing measures had α = 0.05. Statistical analysis was performed in R using RStudio IDE [28,29]. Data was processed using the tidyverse package [30]. Statistical models were fit using the nlme package [31] with a fixed effect of condition and random effect of animal. Heterogeneous variance between conditions was accounted for when necessary. Post hoc testing was performed using the emmeans package [32] with a containment method of calculating degrees of freedom and using a Tukey HSD to correct for multiple comparisons. Additionally, Pearson’s product moment correlations (r) were calculated comparing all amplitude and duration measures to determine relationships using SPSS statistical software.
Results
Tracheal stimulation resulted in bouts of repetitive cough during control and following removal of the cerebellum (measured 10 minutes and >1 hour afterward), and a total of 280 coughs were analyzed. There was no significant difference of cough frequency between conditions [F(2,12) = 0.68; p = 0.5].
Cough amplitude and duration
Table 1 reports data measuring during cough trials before and after cerebellectomy. There was a significant effect of condition on percent of maximum diaphragm [F(2,12) = 4.28; p = 0.04], parasternal [F(2,12) = 12.59; p = 0.001] and thyroarytenoid [F(2,12) = 6.16; p = 0.014] EMG amplitude during cough, and on peak inspiratory esophageal pressure [F(2,12) = 8.48; p = 0.005]. Post hoc analysis revealed significant amplitude changes at 10 minutes post-cerebellectomy compared to control: the diaphragm increased by 14% (p = 0.04), parasternal increased by 34% (p < 0.001), thyroarytenoid (i.e., laryngeal adductor) increased by 13% (p = 0.04) and esophageal pressure by 44% (p = 0.004). At >1 hour post-cerebellectomy compared to control, parasternal EMG amplitude was still increased by 32% (p = 0.03), and while the thyroarytenoid was 32% higher than control, that effect was not significant (p = 0.1). By the >1 hour time point there was also no longer a change in inspiratory esophageal pressure (p = 0.99).
Table 1. Raw means and standard deviations for cough.
A. Amplitude | Condition | Animal # | Diaphragn | Parasternal | Internal Oblique | PCA | Thyroarytenoid | I pressure (cm H20) | E pressure (cm H20) |
Control | 1 | 70 ± 10 | 56 ± 9 | 83 ± 17 | 90 ± 7 | 47 ± 16 | -13 ± 2 | 55 ± 20 | |
Control | 2 | 48 ± 25 | 59 ± 20 | 25 ± 14 | 41 ± 10 | 19 ± 13 | -9 ± 3 | 19 ± 11 | |
Control | 3 | 74 ± 15 | 76 ± 14 | 64 ± 20 | 82 ± 13 | 56 ± 12 | -11 ± 2 | 25 ± 8 | |
Control | 4 | 48 ± 8 | 41 ± 11 | 29 ± 9 | 45 ± 4 | 70 ± 21 | -8 ± 1 | 11 ± 6 | |
Control | 5 | 44 ± 6 | 56 ± 5 | 54 ± 12 | 55 ± 11 | 50 ± 14 | -4 ± 1 | 19 ± 5 | |
Control | 6 | 80 ± 11 | 81 ± 13 | 55 ± 18 | 89 ± 2 | 31 ± 10 | -20 ± 4 | 33 ± 13 | |
Control | 7 | 59 ± 14 | 30 ± 7 | 59 ± 6 | 75 ± 15 | 42 ± 14 | -1 ± 1 | 35 ± 9 | |
Control | 8 | 41 ± 10 | 29 ± 8 | 23 ± 13 | 43 ± 19 | 8 ± 0 | -5 ± 2 | 7 ± 4 | |
Control | 9 | 41 ± 17 | 53 ± 11 | 46 ± 23 | 47 ± 16 | 20 ± 5 | -14 ± 6 | 33 ± 12 | |
>1-hr post | 1 | 78 ± 16 | 71 ± 18 | 62 ± 23 | 70 ± 9 | 72 ± 18 | -10 ± 2 | 38 ± 22 | |
>1-hr post | 2 | 66 ± 18 | 79 ± 16 | 59 ± 28 | 73 ± 22 | 58 ± 30 | -10 ± 2 | 49 ± 23 | |
>1-hr post | 3 | 41 ± 11 | 56 ± 9 | 27 ± 8 | 64 ± 8 | 52 ± 25 | -5 ± 1 | 9 ± 3 | |
>1-hr post | 4 | 68 ± 18 | 79 ± 24 | 71 ± 19 | 79 ± 11 | 70 ± 14 | -10 ± 1 | 21 ± 5 | |
>1-hr post | 5 | 47 ± 9 | 55 ± 8 | 76 ± 17 | 89 ± 8 | 54 ± 14 | -4 ± 1 | 17 ± 4 | |
>1-hr post | 6 | 68 ± 8 | 74 ± 7 | 44 ± 8 | 94 ± 3 | 28 ± 15 | -17 ± 3 | 20 ± 5 | |
>1-hr post | 7 | 71 ± 11 | 75 ± 15 | 36 ± 9 | 71 ± 8 | 44 ± 10 | -6 ± 1 | 11 ± 3 | |
>1-hr post | 8 | 49 ± 30 | 63 ± 24 | 43 ± 38 | 24 ± 4 | 38 ± 36 | -6 ± 3 | 7 ± 5 | |
>1-hr post | 9 | 46 ± 20 | 76 ± 15 | 50 ± 20 | 54 ± 13 | 31 ± 19 | -16 ± 6 | 12 ± 2 | |
10-min post | 5 | 62 ± 16 | 76 ± 12 | 68 ± 9 | 61 ± 7 | 53 ± 13 | -6 ± 2 | 18 ± 3 | |
10-min post | 6 | 84 ± 8 | 89 ± 9 | 67 ± 17 | 92 ± 3 | 56 ± 22 | -26 ± 4 | 40 ± 14 | |
10-min post | 7 | 76 ± 14 | 81 ± 14 | 77 ± 13 | 80 ± 7 | 61 ± 20 | -7 ± 1 | 25 ± 6 | |
10-min post | 8 | 47 ± 13 | 49 ± 13 | 55 ± 26 | 42 ± 21 | 9 ± 1 | -8 ± 2 | 13 ± 6 | |
10-min post | 9 | 50 ± 16 | 61 ± 12 | 42 ± 22 | 54 ± 21 | 34 ± 13 | -16 ± 5 | 18 ± 6 | |
Average | Control | 56 ± 15 | 53 ± 18 | 49 ± 20 | 63 ± 21 | 38 ± 20 | -9 ± 6 | 26 ± 15 | |
>1-hr post | 59 ± 13 | 70 ± 9 * | 52 ± 16 | 69 ± 21 | 50 ± 16 | -9 ± 5 | 20 ± 14 | ||
10-min post | 64 ± 16 * | 71 ± 16 *** | 62 ± 14 | 66 ± 20 | 43 ± 21 * | -13 ± 9 ** | 23 ± 10 |
Tukey’s HSD test used to compare timepoints.
* = p < 0.05,
** = p < 0.01,
*** p < 0.001.
n = 9.
There were no significant changes in the amplitudes of the internal obliques [F(2,12) = 1.24; p = 0.3], posterior cricoarytenoid (PCA; i.e., laryngeal abductor) [F(2,12) = 0.4; p = 0.7], or expiratory esophageal pressure during cough [F(2,12) = 0.77; p = 0.5]. There were also no significant changes in cough phase durations: CTI [F(2,12) = 0.64; p = 0.6], CTE [F(2,12) = 1.21; p = 0.3], CTE1 [F(2,12) = 0.4; p = 0.7], CTE2 [F(2,12) = 1.12; p = 0.4], or CTTOT [F(2,12) = 0.39; p = 0.7] (Table 1).
Upon inspection of the physiological recordings and the measured data at the > 1 hour timepoint, it was apparent that the effect of cerebellectomy on cough varied greatly between animals; Fig 2 illustrates changes in cough features by animal.
Breathing and cardiovascular measures
Table 2 reports data for breathing and cardiovascular measures. Significant condition effects were a decrease in respiratory rate [F(2,12) = 5.803; p = 0.02], an increase in TE [F(2,12) = 4.959; p = 0.03], and an increase in TTOT that did not reach significance [F(2,12) = 3.545; p = 0.06]. Post hoc analysis revealed significant changes 10 minutes post-cerebellectomy compared to control: a 24% decrease in respiratory rate (p = 0.02); the 62% increase in TE and 32% increase in TTOT did not reach significance (p = 0.06 and 0.06, respectively). At this 10-minute timepoint, there were no effects on end-tidal CO2 [F(2,12) = 1.538; p = 0.3], TI [F(2,12) = 0.542; p = 0.6], or diaphragm EMG (percent maximum) activity during breathing [F(2,12) = 0.405; p = 0.7]. By the >1 hour timepoint, there were no significant effects on any breathing measures.
Table 2. Raw means and standard deviations of cardiorespiratory parameters measured preceding a cough trial.
A. Eupnea | Condition | Animal # | Resp Rate (breath/min) | ETCO2 (mmHg) | TI (ms) | TE (ms) | TTOT (ms) | Diaphram EMG (% max) |
Control | 1 | 21 ± 2 | 31 ± 1 | 1416 ± 214 | 1456 ± 170 | 2873 ± 294 | 46 ± 5 | |
Control | 2 | 36 ± 1 | 22 ± 1 | 462 ± 49 | 1203 ± 53 | 1665 ± 88 | 51 ± 9 | |
Control | 3 | 26 ± 1 | 35 ± 1 | 1167 ± 84 | 1180 ± 29 | 2346 ± 98 | 93 ± 5 | |
Control | 4 | 21 ± 2 | 28 ± 1 | 1895 ± 481 | 978 ± 74 | 2873 ± 506 | 76 ± 4 | |
Control | 5 | 26 ± 5 | 29 ± 2 | 956 ± 267 | 1416 ± 227 | 2372 ± 479 | 32 ± 6 | |
Control | 6 | 26 ± 0 | 29 ± 1 | 762 ± 43 | 1531 ± 135 | 2293 ± 172 | 83 ± 8 | |
Control | 7 | 14 ± 1 | 34 ± 0 | 1789 ± 109 | 2504 ± 351 | 4293 ± 423 | 91 ± 6 | |
Control | 8 | 23 ± 0 | 31 ± 1 | 1601 ± 338 | 1005 ± 43 | 2607 ± 369 | 92 ± 2 | |
Control | 9 | 31 ± 1 | 28 ± 0 | 540 ± 27 | 1423 ± 64 | 1964 ± 66 | 84 ± 5 | |
>1-hr post | 1 | 12 ± 1 | 26 ± 0 | 1797 ± 85 | 3389 ± 267 | 5186 ± 333 | 96 ± 3 | |
>1-hr post | 2 | 19 ± 1 | 34 ± 0 | 948 ± 68 | 2250 ± 222 | 3198 ± 242 | 91 ± 7 | |
>1-hr post | 3 | 23 ± 0 | 29 ± 1 | 990 ± 180 | 1582 ± 198 | 2573 ± 55 | 82 ± 2 | |
>1-hr post | 4 | 33 ± 2 | 24 ± 2 | 965 ± 133 | 879 ± 63 | 1845 ± 172 | 80 ± 8 | |
>1-hr post | 5 | 43 ± 1 | 16 ± 0 | 773 ± 37 | 633 ± 26 | 1406 ± 53 | 29 ± 2 | |
>1-hr post | 6 | 21 ± 1 | 27 ± 1 | 966 ± 97 | 1886 ± 147 | 2851 ± 215 | 88 ± 3 | |
>1-hr post | 7 | 14 ± 2 | 33 ± 1 | 1149 ± 200 | 3310 ± 752 | 4458 ± 585 | 55 ± 9 | |
>1-hr post | 8 | 20 ± 2 | 23 ± 0 | 1362 ± 156 | 1669 ± 157 | 3031 ± 293 | 87 ± 5 | |
>1-hr post | 9 | 26 ± 0 | 26 ± 0 | 802 ± 87 | 1496 ± 53 | 2299 ± 109 | 97 ± 2 | |
10-min post | 5 | 25 ± 2 | 23 ± 2 | 1204 ± 721 | 1201 ± 235 | 2405 ± 505 | 34 ± 27 | |
10-min post | 6 | 16 ± 1 | 28 ± 1 | 907 ± 67 | 2752 ± 170 | 3659 ± 185 | 90 ± 4 | |
10-min post | 7 | 14 ± 0 | 34 ± 0 | 976 ± 83 | 3232 ± 199 | 4208 ± 226 | 54 ± 3 | |
10-min post | 8 | 14 ± 0 | 31 ± 1 | 1810 ± 59 | 2459 ± 168 | 4269 ± 182 | 96 ± 5 | |
10-min post | 9 | 23 ± 1 | 26 ± 1 | 778 ± 45 | 1785 ± 90 | 2563 ± 115 | 91 ± 3 | |
Average | Control | 25 ± 6 | 30 ± 4 | 1177 ± 532 | 1411 ± 456 | 2587 ± 750 | 72 ± 23 | |
>1-hr post | 23 ± 10 | 26 ± 5 | 1084 ± 320 | 1899 ± 955 | 2983 ± 1200 | 78 ± 22 | ||
10-min post | 19 ± 5* | 29 ± 4 | 1135 ± 408 | 2286 ± 802 | 3421 ± 889 | 73 ± 27 |
Tukey’s HSD test used to compare timepoints.
* = p < 0.05,
** = p < 0.01,
*** p < 0.001.
n = 7.
Cardiovascular parameters were also recorded during this baseline eupneic breathing period before the cough trial. Cerebellectomy had a significant effect on systolic pressure [F(2,10) = 12.658; p = 0.002], diastolic pressure [F(2,10) = 17.724; p = 0.001], mean arterial pressure [F(2,10) = 17.57; p = 0.001], and heart rate [F(2,10) = 10.158; p = 0.004]. A post hoc analysis showed significant decreases at 10 minutes post-cerebellectomy compared to control: a 23% reduction in systolic pressure (p = 0.001), a 26% reduction in diastolic pressure (p = 0.001), a 25% decrease in mean arterial pressure (p = 0.001), and an 16% decrease in heart rate (p = 0.02). These effects persisted at the >1 hour timepoint, with a 17% decrease in systolic pressure (p = 0.02), a 23% decrease in diastolic pressure (p = 0.001), a 21% decrease in mean arterial pressure (p = 0.002), and a 14% decrease in heart rate (p = 0.04) when compared to control. Pulse pressure was unaffected by cerebellectomy at either timepoint [F(2,10) = 1.144; p = 0.4].
Table 3 is a correlation matrix showing all Pearson Product Moment Correlations for EMG amplitude, phase timing, and pressure measures during cough. These values are consistent with previous publications [25,27] with the cough total cycle time being primarily correlated with CTE2. There were also strong correlations between EMGs magnitudes for the diaphragm with the parasternal (r = 0.82), internal oblique (r = 0.61) and the PCA (r = 0.78) muscles. Additionally, expiratory esophageal pressures were strongly correlated with both the internal oblique (r = 0.65) and the PCA (r = 0.66) muscle EMG amplitudes.
Table 3. Pearson product moment correlations for all dependent measures across all conditions.
EMG Magnitude | Phase Timing | Esophageal Pressure | |||||||||||
Diaphragm | Parasternal | Internal Oblique | PCA | Thyroarytenoid | CTI | CTE | CTE1 | CTE2 | CTTOT | I pressure | E pressure | ||
EMG Magnitude | Diaphragm | 0.82 | 0.61 | 0.78 | 0.54 | 0.08 | 0.22 | 0.09 | 0.20 | 0.20 | -0.56 | 0.57 | |
Parasternal | 0.57 | 0.47 | 0.52 | -0.04 | 0.07 | 0.10 | 0.04 | 0.03 | -0.58 | 0.45 | |||
Internal Oblique | 0.53 | 0.45 | -0.02 | -0.04 | -0.17 | 0.01 | -0.05 | -0.27 | 0.65 | ||||
PCA | 0.26 | -0.17 | 0.05 | 0.08 | 0.03 | -0.05 | -0.56 | 0.66 | |||||
Thyroarytenoid | <-0.01 | 0.10 | -0.15 | 0.16 | 0.07 | -0.07 | 0.23 | ||||||
Phase Timing | CTI (ms) | 0.27 | 0.05 | 0.26 | 0.68 | 0.19 | -0.12 | ||||||
CTE (ms) | 0.0–0.2 | Neglible | 0.20 | 0.96 | 0.89 | -0.13 | 0.20 | ||||||
CTE1 (ms) | 0.2–0.4 | Weak | -0.10 | 0.17 | -0.44 | -0.04 | |||||||
CTE2 (ms) | 0.4–0.6 | Moderate | 0.85 | <0.01 | 0.21 | ||||||||
CTTOT (ms) | 0.6–0.8 | Strong | <-0.01 | 0.09 | |||||||||
Esophageal Pressure | I pressure | 0.8–1.0 | Very Strong | -0.49 | |||||||||
E pressure |
n = 9.
Discussion
While the cerebellum is important for processing motor feedback, its specific role in cough has not been entirely elucidated. Our results demonstrate a short-term (10 minutes after cerebellectomy) enhancement in laryngeal adduction and inspiratory related amplitudes generated during cough, with no effect on phase durations or cough frequency. However, by the >1 hour timepoint, there was stark animal-by-animal variation in the effect of cerebellectomy on cough (Fig 2). This unpredictability suggests that cerebellar modulation of cough and respiratory related behaviors cannot be assumed to comprise merely simple motor feedback.
Cerebellectomy produced time-dependent changes on cough magnitude
Our data differ from those reported by Xu et al. [20]; we observed no significant change in the number, frequency, or phase timing of cough, nor did we notice any consistent depression in motor output. Acutely, there was a significant increase in cough motor drive, but at ~1 hour post-cerebellectomy there were large variations between animals. The absence of a paralytic agent in our animals is one possible explanation for the differences reported between here and in Xu et al [20]. In our animals, the cerebellum likely received the dynamic muscle-related feedback from large chest wall excursions during cough and may have exerted an inhibitory effect on some aspect of the cough pattern generator or medullary bulbospinal premotor neurons. Additionally, our preparation is cerebrally intact, preserving suprapontine pathways that connect the brainstem with midbrain and forebrain structures. We also cannot rule out the possibility that the differences between our results and those of Xu et al. [20] can be explained at least in part by the lack of suprapontine pathways. Suprapontine structures are involved in sensation of tussigenic stimuli and cough production [33,34]. Studies of higher order brain structures and cough typically focus on evoked or volitional cough, but some report evidence that suprapontine brain regions and altered cognitive states modulate reflex cough [35–37]. Suprapontine pathways can also affect cerebellar function, [17,38–40] possibly obfuscating the influence of the cerebellum on cough. Finally, differences in anesthesia may contribute to disparate study results. The role of anesthesia in modifying cough is not fully understood. However, intense coughing occurs in our preparation and expiratory esophageal pressures can exceed 100 mmHg [41], which is within the range of that produced in awake humans [42]. This observation is consistent with a limited direct effect of pentobarbital anesthesia (maintained at a surgical level) on maximum cough motor drive in cat. Of note, neither our data nor those presented by Xu et al. [20] account for additional changes in cough due to craniotomy and the associated perturbations and potential dysregulation of intracranial pressure. The influence of cough on intracranial pressure has been well documented [43], however, to our knowledge no study has quantified the effects of craniotomy alone on cough.
Acutely, removing the cerebellum resulted in significantly stronger motor output during coughing when compared to control; this was followed by significant animal-by-animal variability at the >1 hour timepoint. The specific mechanism of this effect is unknown, but may it be mediated primarily through vagal or spinal feedback onto brainstem areas. Xu and Frazier [44] reported that cerebellectomy altered abdominal EMG and phase timing when respiratory drive was experimentally increased by expiratory loading and occlusion, and that these changes disappeared after vagal cooling but not dorsal column cooling. Vagally-mediated reflex responses to lung inflation are well-described as the result of pulmonary stretch receptors synapsing on pump cells in the respiratory control network [7,45,46]. It is plausible that bulbocerebellar brainstem connections, along with afferent information from the vagus, are the primary physiological mechanism for the influence of the cerebellum on cough, as opposed to spinocerebellar pathways.
Our results support the idea that the cerebellum, in animals with an anatomically intact nervous system, can regulate the gain of motor activation of upper airway and chest wall muscles during cough. Additionally, the effect on motor output became highly variable an hour after cerebellectomy, with animals displaying a heterogeneous response to cerebellectomy at this timepoint. Cough, as a behavior that is capable of large shifts in excitability, may have revealed a previously obscured feature of cerebellectomy. This variability may have been revealed by our experimental preparation because the animals are relatively more intact. In paralyzed, decerebrated preparations, mechanically-induced fictive cough-related inspiratory motor drive is approximately 65% greater than that during breathing [47]. However, in anesthetized animals with intact nervous systems, inspiratory motor drive during tracheobronchial cough can be increased by over 300% [48]. Therefore, inspiratory gain modulation during cough is more pronounced in anesthetized, unparalyzed preparations with an intact neuraxis. This motor regulatory mechanism is more similar to that observed in unanesthetized humans. This increased range for gain modulation in this preparation may underlie disparate reported effects of cerebellectomy. For example, cerebellectomy has been variously reported to increase [49], decrease [50], or have no effect [40,51–53] on respiration. These discrepancies are between studies rather than within one data set as presented here. Future investigations of the effects of cerebellectomy on the upper airway may need to report individual values in addition to group means to adequately represent the diversity of responses. The mechanism by which motor output shifted from a homogenous to heterogeneous response after cerebellectomy is unknown. It is possible that the effect on the tissue of the lesion itself caused an early increase in excitation, followed later by more heterogeneous responses upon reaching a new homeostasis. Future cerebellectomy studies may need to evaluate this perturbation over a longer time period and/or at a more granular level.
The present correlations are consistent with previous manuscripts [25,27], with limited relationships between the inspiratory and expiratory phases of cough and strong relationships between measures of expiratory duration (CTE and CTE2) with total cough cycle time. In the present analysis we also expanded the variables of interest and were surprised that diaphragm amplitude had moderate relationships with internal oblique and thyroarytenoid muscle amplitudes. This may be due in part to the expanded data set, which includes increased and decreased states of excitability, and could warrant further study.
Cerebellectomy slightly reduced respiratory rate due to a prolongation of the expiratory phase of breathing
Past investigations of cerebellectomy effects on eupneic breathing show mixed results. We noticed that cerebellectomy altered the eupneic ventilatory pattern, reducing respiratory rate primarily through the prolongation of the expiratory phase of breathing. This change was not accompanied by decreased end-tidal CO2. Williams et al. [50] similarly reported a prolonged TTOT and TE (in addition to a slightly prolonged TI) and a reduced respiratory frequency post-cerebellectomy in vagal intact animals. However, several other publications reported no change in eupneic breathing values in vagally intact animals [40,51–53]. At least one study did report increased respiratory frequency, but this sample included some vagotomized animals [49]. Furthermore, a change in respiratory frequency without a change in cough frequency is supported by our prior results, suggesting differential regulation of cough and breathing [48].
Cerebellectomy decreased blood pressures and heart rate
We also observed modest decreases in blood pressures (systolic, diastolic, and mean arterial pressures) and heart rate post-cerebellectomy in the period immediately before a cough trial. Several of the aforementioned studies reported no change in blood pressure [40,52,53]. However, Williams et al. [50] reported that cerebellectomy or lesioning the fastigial nucleus reduced heart rate. Cerebellectomy can also reverse or reduce the increases in blood pressure produced by peripheral nerve stimulation in the rabbit and cat [54,55].
Several studies have demonstrated cerebellar connections with brainstem centers believed to be involved with autonomic regulation [56–58]. A fastigial pressor response [59–61] can be elicited by electrical stimulation of the fastigial nucleus via fastigiobulbar pathways in the brain stem. It is possible that this fastigial pressor response is active during bouts of repetitive coughing, and that by cerebellectomizing the animals, we removed part of a feedback loop tasked with maintaining a stable blood pressure during bouts of extreme thoracic pressure changes. Another potential source of this discrepancy between studies could be differences in anesthetic type or depth.
While we cannot completely discount the role of blood pressure on cough in our preparation, the effect of blood pressure on cough likely produces a separate cough phenotype [62]. In prior studies, reductions in blood pressure did enhance cough related EMGs, but it also produced changes in cough phase timing and an increase in cough number that we did not see post-cerebellectomy. Lutherer & Williams [63] were also able to elicit changes in breathing while pharmacologically blocking changes in cardiovascular output, providing further evidence for cerebellar influence on respiration independent of other autonomic changes.
Laryngeal regulation during cough
Since the investigation of Poliacek and colleagues [26], techniques for laryngeal EMG placement for recording the adduction and abduction of the larynx have improved. The present study is the first to report motor drive to laryngeal motoneurons before and after cerebellectomy. Consistent with Poliacek et al. [26], we observed biphasic activity in the PCA (laryngeal abductor), and a depression in PCA activity concomitant with the thyroarytenoid (laryngeal adductor) burst (Fig 1). There is, however, some overlap in activity between the thyroarytenoid and PCA muscles as the cough shifts from the compressive to the expulsive phase. The coactivation of these muscles may act to stiffen the laryngeal apparatus during the extreme pressures generated during cough, and feedback from laryngeal muscle spindles may facilitate coordination between these muscles. Afferent projections from the larynx are represented in the cerebellum [16], and perhaps this feedback regulates motor output to maintain a set point for laryngeal stiffness during cough. Interestingly, we observed the opposite effect of cerebellectomy on thyroarytenoid activity during swallow reported in Reed and colleagues [51]. These data in combination with what is previously understood about breathing demonstrate a clear need for research on all pattern generators important for airway protection, as the effects on a single behavior are not translated to others.
Conclusions
Shortly after cerebellectomy (10 minutes), there are significant increases in cough motor drive. After ~1 hour, this changed, as individual animals had highly variable responses during cough. However, the effect of the cerebellum on cough seems to be dependent on the presence of movement-related afferent feedback to the remainder of the respiratory/cough control network. Further research is necessary to determine which cerebellar structures and pathways are responsible for clinical disorders[21], and also to determine why cerebellar dysfunction can produce such variable effects [64,65]. These results suggest that, while the cerebellum and behavior-related sensory feedback regulate cough, it may be difficult to predict the nature of the modulation based on total cerebellectomy.
Supporting information
Data Availability
All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting information files.
Funding Statement
Research reported in this publication was supported by the National Institute of Health Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (https://www.nhlbi.nih.gov) HL131716 (DCB) and the Office of The Director, (https://www.nih.gov/institutes-nih/nih-office-director) 3OT2OD023854 (DCB). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
References
- 1.Canning BJ, Chou Y-L. Cough sensors. I. physiological and pharmacological properties of the afferent nerves regulating cough. In: Chung KF, Widdicombe J, editors. Pharmacology and Therapeutics of Cough. Springer; Berlin Heidelberg; 2009. pp. 23–47. doi: 10.1007/978-3-540-79842-2_2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Kollarik M, Undem BJ. Sensory transduction in cough-associated nerves. Respir Physiol Neurobiol. 2006;152: 243–254. doi: 10.1016/j.resp.2005.12.008 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Canning BJ, Mori N. An essential component to brainstem cough gating identified in anesthetized guinea pigs. FASEB J Off Publ Fed Am Soc Exp Biol. 2010;24: 3916–3926. doi: 10.1096/fj.09-151068 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Mazzone SB, Reynolds SM, Mori N, Kollarik M, Farmer DG, Myers AC, et al. Selective expression of a sodium pump isozyme by cough receptors and evidence for its essential role in regulating cough. J Neurosci. 2009;29: 13662–13671. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4354-08.2009 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Baekey DM, Morris KF, Nuding SC, Segers LS, Lindsey BG, Shannon R. Medullary raphe neuron activity is altered during fictive cough in the decerebrate cat. J Appl Physiol. 2003;94: 93–100. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00341.2002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Feldman JL, McCrimmon DR, Mitchell GS, Del Negro CA. Brainstem respiratory circuits. In: Squire LR, editor. Encyclopedia of Neuroscience. 2009. pp. 463–470. [Google Scholar]
- 7.Kubin L, Alheid GF, Zuperku EJ, McCrimmon DR. Central pathways of pulmonary and lower airway vagal afferents. J Appl Physiol Bethesda Md 1985. 2006;101: 618–627. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00252.2006 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Widdicombe J, Tatar M, Fontana G, Hanacek J, Davenport P, Lavorini F, et al. Workshop: tuning the “cough center”. Pulm Pharmacol Ther. 2011;24: 344–52. doi: 10.1016/j.pupt.2010.12.010 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Hanacek J, Tatar M, Widdicombe J. Regulation of cough by secondary sensory inputs. Respir Physiol Amp Neurobiol. 2006;152: 282–297. doi: 10.1016/j.resp.2006.02.014 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Kawato M. Internal models for motor control and trajectory planning. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 1999;9: 718–727. doi: 10.1016/s0959-4388(99)00028-8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Oscarsson O. Functional organization of the spino- and cuneocerebellar tracts. Physiol Rev. 1965;45: 495–522. doi: 10.1152/physrev.1965.45.3.495 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Albus JS. A theory of cerebellar function. Math Biosci. 1971;10: 25–61. doi: 10.1016/0025-5564(71)90051-4 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Eccles JC. Circuits in the cerebellar control of movement. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 1967;58: 336–343. doi: 10.1073/pnas.58.1.336 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Passot J-B, Luque NR, Arleo A. Coupling internal cerebellar models enhances online adaptation and supports offline consolidation in sensorimotor tasks. Front Comput Neurosci. 2013;7. doi: 10.3389/fncom.2013.00095 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Hennemann HE, Rubia FJ. Vagal representation in the cerebellum of the cat. Pflugers Arch. 1978;375: 119–123. doi: 10.1007/BF00584233 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Lam RL, Ogura JH. An afferent representation of the larynx in the cerebellum. The Laryngoscope. 1952;62: 486–495. doi: 10.1288/00005537-195205000-00007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Glasser RL, Tippett JW, Davidian VA. Cerebellar activity, apneustic breathing, and the neural control of respiration. Nature. 1966;209: 810–812. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Xu F, Frazier DT. Medullary respiratory neuronal activity modulated by stimulation of the fastigial nucleus of the cerebellum. Brain Res. 1995;705: 53–64. doi: 10.1016/0006-8993(95)01138-2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Xu F, Frazier DT. Role of the cerebellar deep nuclei in respiratory modulation. The Cerebellum. 2002;1: 35. doi: 10.1080/147342202753203078 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Xu F, Frazier DT, Zhang Z, Baekey DM, Shannon R. Cerebellar modulation of cough motor pattern in cats. J Appl Physiol. 1997;83: 391–397. doi: 10.1152/jappl.1997.83.2.391 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Coutinho P, Cruz VT, Tuna A, Silva SE, Guimarães J. Cerebellar ataxia with spasmodic cough: a new form of dominant ataxia. Arch Neurol. 2006;63: 553–555. doi: 10.1001/archneur.63.4.553 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Basmajian JV, Stecko G. A new bipolar electrode for electromyography. J Appl Physiol. 1962;17: 849–849. doi: 10.1152/jappl.1962.17.5.849 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Einthoven W. The different forms of the human electrocardiogram and their signification. The Lancet. 1912;179: 853–861. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(00)50560-1 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Kotmanova Z, Simera M, Veternik M, Martvon L, Misek J, Jakus J, et al. GABA-ergic neurotransmission in the nucleus of the solitary tract modulates cough in the cat. Respir Physiol Neurobiol. 2018. doi: 10.1016/j.resp.2018.02.009 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Pitts T, Morris KF, Segers LS, Poliacek I, Rose MJ, Lindsey BG, et al. Feed-forward and reciprocal inhibition for gain and phase timing control in a computational model of repetitive cough. J Appl Physiol. 2016; jap.00790.2015. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00790.2015 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Poliacek I, Stránsky A, Jakuš J, Baráni H, Tomori Z, Halašová E. Activity of the laryngeal abductor and adductor muscles during cough, expiration and aspiration reflexes in cats. 2003;52: 14. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Wang C, Saha S, Rose MJ, Davenport PW, Bolser DC. Spatiotemporal regulation of the cough motor pattern. Cough. 2009;5: 12. doi: 10.1186/1745-9974-5-12 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.R Core Team. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing; 2020. https://www.R-project.org/. [Google Scholar]
- 29.RStudio Team. RStudio: Integrated Development Environment for R. Boston, MA: RStudio, PBC; 2020. http://www.rstudio.com/. [Google Scholar]
- 30.Wickham H, Averick M, Bryan J, Chang W, McGowan L, François R, et al. Welcome to the tidyverse. J Open Source Softw. 2019;4: 1686. doi: 10.21105/joss.01686 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Pinheiro J, Bates D, DebRoy S, Sarkar D, R Core Team. nlme: Linear and Nonlinear Mixed Effects Models. 2020. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=nlme.
- 32.Lenth RV. emmeans: Estimated Marginal Means, aka Least-Squares Means. 2020. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=emmeans.
- 33.Mazzone SB, Cole LJ, Ando A, Egan GF, Farrell MJ. Investigation of the neural control of cough and cough suppression in humans using functional brain imaging. J Neurosci. 2011;31: 2948–58. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4597-10.2011 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Mazzone SB, McGovern AE, Yang S-K, Woo A, Phipps S, Ando A, et al. Sensorimotor circuitry involved in the higher brain control of coughing. Cough. 2013;9: 7. doi: 10.1186/1745-9974-9-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Hegland KW, Bolser DC, Davenport PW. Volitional control of reflex cough. J Appl Physiol 1985. 2012;113: 39–46. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.01299.2011 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Moulton C, Pennycook AG. Relation between Glasgow coma score and cough reflex. The Lancet. 1994;343: 1261–1262. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(94)92155-5 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Widdicombe J, Eccles R, Fontana G. Supramedullary influences on cough. Respir Physiol Neurobiol. 2016;152: 320–8. doi: 10.1016/j.resp.2006.02.018 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Bostan AC, Dum RP, Strick PL. The basal ganglia communicate with the cerebellum. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010;107: 8452–8456. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1000496107 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Bostan AC, Dum RP, Strick PL. Cerebellar networks with the cerebral cortex and basal ganglia. Trends Cogn Sci. 2013;17: 241–254. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2013.03.003 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Xu F, Taylor RF, Lee LY, Frazier DT. Respiratory load compensation. II. Role of the cerebellum. J Appl Physiol. 1993;75: 675–681. doi: 10.1152/jappl.1993.75.2.675 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Bolser DC, Davenport PW. Volume-timing relationships during cough and resistive loading in the cat. J Appl Physiol. 2000;89: 785–790. doi: 10.1152/jappl.2000.89.2.785 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Man WD-C, Kyroussis D, Fleming TA, Chetta A, Harraf F, Mustfa N, et al. Cough gastric pressure and maximum expiratory mouth pressure in humans. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2003;168: 714–717. doi: 10.1164/rccm.200303-334BC [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Williams B. Cerebrospinal fluid pressure changes in response to coughing. Brain. 1976;99: 331–346. doi: 10.1093/brain/99.2.331 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Xu F, Frazier DT. Cerebellar role in the load-compensating response of expiratory muscle. J Appl Physiol. 1994;77: 1232–1238. doi: 10.1152/jappl.1994.77.3.1232 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Hanácek J, Davies A, Widdicombe JG. Influence of lung stretch receptors on the cough reflex in rabbits. Respir Int Rev Thorac Dis. 1984;45: 161–168. doi: 10.1159/000194614 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Poliacek I, Simera M, Veternik M, Kotmanova Z, Pitts T, Hanacek J, et al. The course of lung inflation alters the central pattern of tracheobronchial cough in cat—The evidence for volume feedback during cough. Respir Physiol Neurobiol. 2016;229: 43–50. doi: 10.1016/j.resp.2016.04.008 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Bolser DC. Fictive cough in the cat. J Appl Physiol. 1991;71: 2325–2331. doi: 10.1152/jappl.1991.71.6.2325 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Bolser DC, Hey JA, Chapman RW. Influence of central antitussive drugs on the cough motor pattern. J Appl Physiol. 1999;86: 1017–1024. doi: 10.1152/jappl.1999.86.3.1017 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Huang Q, Zhou D, John WMS. Vestibular and cerebellar modulation of expiratory motor activities in the cat. J Physiol. 1991;436: 385–404. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1991.sp018556 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Williams JL, Robinson PJ, Lutherer LO. Inhibitory effects of cerebellar lesions on respiration in the spontaneously breathing, anesthetized cat. Brain Res. 1986;399: 224–231. doi: 10.1016/0006-8993(86)91512-x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Reed MD, English M, English C, Huff A, Poliacek I, Musselwhite MN, et al. The role of the cerebellum in control of swallow: evidence of inspiratory activity during swallow. Lung. 2019. doi: 10.1007/s00408-018-00192-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Xu F, Owen J, Frazier DT. Hypoxic respiratory responses attenuated by ablation of the cerebellum or fastigial nuclei. J Appl Physiol. 1995;79: 1181–1189. doi: 10.1152/jappl.1995.79.4.1181 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Xu F, Frazier DT. Involvement of the fastigial nuclei in vagally mediated respiratory responses. J Appl Physiol. 1997;82: 1853–1861. doi: 10.1152/jappl.1997.82.6.1853 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Ramu A, Bergmann F. The role of the cerebellum in blood pressure regulation. Experientia. 1967;23: 383–384. doi: 10.1007/BF02144532 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Ramu A, Bergmann F. The effects of pentobarbitone and cerebellectomy on blood-pressure changes evoked by stimulation of the central end of the cut vagus of the rabbit. Eur J Pharmacol. 1972;19: 160–164. doi: 10.1016/0014-2999(72)90004-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Giuditta M, Ruggiero DA, Del Bo A. Anatomical Basis for the Fastigial Pressor Response. Blood Press. 2003;12: 175–180. doi: 10.1080/08037050310010912 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Thomas DM, Kaufman RP, Sprague JM, Chambers WW. Experimental studies of the vermal cerebellar projections in the brain stem of the cat (fastigiobulbar tract). J Anat. 1956;90: 371–385. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Walberg F, Pompeiano O, Westrum LE, Hauglie-Hanseen E. Fastigioreticular fibers in the cat. An experimental study with silver methods. J Comp Neurol. 1962;119: 187–199. doi: 10.1002/cne.901190205 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Miura M, Reis D. A blood pressure response from fastigial nucleus and its relay pathway in brainstem. Am J Physiol-Leg Content. 1970;219: 1330–1336. doi: 10.1152/ajplegacy.1970.219.5.1330 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Miura M, Reis DJ. Cerebellum: a pressor response elicited from the fastigial nucleus and its efferent pathway in brainstem. Brain Res. 1969;13: 595–599. doi: 10.1016/0006-8993(69)90269-8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Zanchetti A, Zoccolini A. Autonomic hypothalamic outbursts elicited by cerebellar stimulation. J Neurophysiol. 1954;17: 475–483. doi: 10.1152/jn.1954.17.5.475 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Poliacek I, Morris KF, Lindsey BG, Segers LS, Rose MJ, Corrie LW, et al. Blood pressure changes alter tracheobronchial cough: computational model of the respiratory-cough network and in vivo experiments in anesthetized cats. J Appl Physiol 1985. 2011;111: 861–73. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00458.2011 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Lutherer LO, Williams JL. Stimulating fastigial nucleus pressor region elicits patterned respiratory responses. Am J Physiol-Regul Integr Comp Physiol. 1986;250: R418–R426. doi: 10.1152/ajpregu.1986.250.3.R418 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Juby AG, Shandro P, Emery D. Palato-pharyngo-laryngeal myoclonus… an unusual cause of dysphagia. Age Ageing. 2014;43: 877–879. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afu066 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Pearce JMS. Palatal Myoclonus (syn. Palatal Tremor). Eur Neurol. 2008;60: 312–315. doi: 10.1159/000159929 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting information files.