Abstract
Positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) is currently one of the main imaging modalities for cancer patients worldwide. Fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) PET/CT has earned its global recognition in the modern management of cancer patients and is rapidly becoming an important imaging modality for patients with cardiac, neurological, and infectious/inflammatory conditions.
Despite its proven benefits, FDG has limitations in the assessment of several relevant tumours such as prostate cancer. Therefore, there has been a pressing need for the development and clinical application of different PET radiopharmaceuticals that could image these tumours more precisely. Accordingly, several non-FDG PET radiopharmaceuticals have been introduced into the clinical arena for management of cancer. This trend will undoubtedly continue to spread internationally. The use of PET/CT with different PET radiopharmaceuticals specific to tumour type and biological process being assessed is part of the personalised precision medicine approach.
The objective of this publication is to provide a case-based method of understanding normal biodistribution, variants, and pitfalls, including several examples of different imaging appearances for the main oncological indications for each of the new non-FDG PET radiopharmaceuticals. This should facilitate the interpretation and recognition of common variants and pitfalls to ensure that, in clinical practice, the official report is accurate and helpful.
Some of these radiopharmaceuticals are already commercially available in many countries (e.g. 68Ga-DOTATATE and DOTATOC), others are in the process of becoming available (e.g. 68Ga-PSMA), and some are still being researched. However, this list is subject to change as some radiopharmaceuticals are increasingly utilised, while others gradually decrease in use.
Keywords: PET/CT, Non-FDG, Pictorial
Radioisotopes
Carbon-11 is a PET radioisotope with a T1/2 of 20.4 min. Due to the abundance of carbon in the chemistry of biomolecules, all C-11 radiopharmaceuticals demonstrate identical behaviour to natural compounds, allowing real tracing of the biological processes.
Fluorine-18 is a PET radioisotope with a T1/2 of 109.7 min. Due to high chemical stability of the C-F bond in organic compounds, and the high water solubility of F-compounds, F-18 tracers usually exhibit suitable stability and biodistribution in humans. The vast clinical application of F-compounds has led to the development of efficient automated production methods of F-18 tracers for clinical use.
Gallium-68 has a T1/2 of 67.7 min, and is usually obtained from a germanium-68 generator. Due to the T1/2 of 271 days of the parent isotope, 68Ge, the generator can be used for in-hospital production of Ga-68.
Radiopharmaceuticals
Acetate
Names: CH3[11C]O2, 11C-acetate
Biodistribution and metabolism (Fig. 1)
After injection 11C-acetate is dispersed in many human tissues including the pancreas, bowels, liver, kidneys, and spleen. The tracer is not excreted in urine under normal circumstances. 11C-acetate is typically incorporated into the cellular membrane in proportion to the cellular proliferation rate or alternatively oxidised to carbon dioxide and water. 11C-acetate may also be converted into amino acids (Seltzer et al. 2004; Karanikas and Beheshti 2014).
Scan acquisition
• Fast of 4 h is suggested
• 4 or 5 MBq\Kg of 11C-acetate iv
• Uptake time 10–20 min
• Acquisition starts from the pelvis
Clinical indications in oncology (Figs. 2 and 3)
The main clinical application of 11C-acetate is the detection of non 18F-FDG-avid neoplasm, such as differentiated hepatocellular carcinoma and renal cell carcinomas (Hain and Maisey 2003; Ho et al. 2003; Park et al. 2008). Some other applications of 11C-acetate PET are brain tumours (Liu et al. 2006) and lung carcinomas, while in the past the tracer has been used in prostate cancer (Sandblom et al. 2006).
FES
Names: 16α-[18F] Fluoro-17β-estradiol; 16-Fluoroestradiol, 18F-fluoroestradiol
Biodistribution and metabolism (Fig. 4)
After injection, the tracer is cleared from the blood and metabolised in 20 min. 18F-fluoroestradiol binds to the oestrogen receptors on the tumour cell surface as well as intratumoural receptors in oestrogen receptor-positive tumours (Liao et al. 2016).
Scan acquisition
Treatment with oestrogen receptor antagonists (e.g. tamoxifen, fulvestrant, faslodex, oestrogens) should be suspended for at least 5 weeks prior to performing the scan. Aromatase inhibitors and luteinizing hormone releasing hormone agonists may be continued
No fasting is required
200 MBq of 18F-fluoroestradiol iv
Level of binding of 18F-FES to the oestrogen receptors remains stable between 20 and 120 min postinjection. For logistical reasons, scanning procedure should start 60 min after injection
Clinical indications in oncology (Figs. 5 and 6)
18F-fluoroestradiol is a valuable tracer for the studies of the oestrogen receptor status of primary and metastatic breast or ovarian cancers (Venema et al. 2016; van Kruchten et al. 2013a; van Kruchten et al. 2012; van Kruchten et al. 2013b; Peterson et al. 2011; Linden et al. 2011).
FET
Names: O-(2-[18F] Fluoroethyl)-L-tyrosine; 18F-fluoroethyltyrosine
Biodistribution and metabolism (Fig. 7)
18F-FET is an amino-acid PET tracer. After injection, the tracer is trapped into cancerous cells, though it is not incorporated into proteins (Abe et al. 2006).
Scan acquisition
• Fasting for at least 4 h is required
• 4–5 MBq\Kg of 18F-FET iv
• Dynamic one bed brain acquisition for 40 min or static one bed brain acquisitions at 10 and 40–50 min. after injection, for 10 min.
Clinical indications in oncology (Figs. 8, 9, and 10)
Diagnosis of central nervous system tumours (very low background in healthy brain) (Galldiks et al. 2015; Albert et al. 2016; Unterrainer et al. 2016; Kunz et al. 2011; Poulsen et al. 2017).
FLT
Names: 3′-deoxy-3′-[18F]-fluorothymidine; 18F-fluorothymidine
Biodistribution and metabolism (Fig. 11)
18F-FLT is an analogue of the nucleoside thymidine; however, substitution of the 3′-F atom prevents from further entering the regular biochemical pathway. FLT is transported from the blood into cells by active transport and phosphorylated by thymidine kinase I without incorporation into the DNA. The conjugated FLT is cleared via the kidneys and excreted in the urine. The accumulated activity in the cells is proportional to thymidine kinase 1 activity as well as cellular proliferation (Grierson and Shields 2000; Oh et al. 2004; Shankar 2012; Turcotte et al. 2007; Vesselle et al. 2003).
Scan acquisition
• No fasting is required
• 2–3 MBq\Kg of 18F-FLT iv
• Uptake time 50–60 min
Clinical indications in oncology (Figs. 12, 13, and 14)
18F-FLT is a marker for tumour cell proliferation that has been introduced to improve the accuracy of early FDG PET assessment (Kenny et al. 2007).
Methionine
Names: L-[methyl-11C] Methionine; 11C-Methionine
Biodistribution and metabolism (Fig. 15)
11C-Methionine, an essential amino acid, enters the cells by various aminoacid transporters and is involved in the synthesis of proteins and lipids, as well as in the regulation and synthesis of DNA and RNA (Davis et al. 1982; Deloar et al. 1998; Harris et al. 2013).
Scan acquisition
• Fasting for at least 2 h
• 3 MBq/kg of 11C-Methionine iv
• Injection immediately before the start of the emission
Clinical indications in oncology (Figs. 16, 17, and 18)
11C-Methionine is used in the detection of brain tumours, primarily gliomas. The gliomas present an increased protein metabolism and capture 11C-Methionine through specific carriers, in contrast to normal tissues that show low uptake.
Choline
Names:
[11C]CH, 11C-choline
[18F]CH, 18F-fluorocholine
Biodistribution and metabolism (Fig. 19)
After injection, the tracer rapidly clears from the circulation (< 3 min), with high clearance by liver and kidneys. Increased metabolism will lead to an increased uptake of choline in the cell membranes and tissues.
11C-choline distributes mainly to the pancreas, kidneys, liver, spleen, and colon. Based upon the relatively low urinary excretion of radioactivity, renal distribution is predominantly to the organ itself, rather than via formation of urine.
The urinary excretion of 18F-fluorocholine has been reported to be about 5% of the administered activity in female patients and 2% in male patients within 60 min after injection (Mitterhauser et al. 2005; DeGrado et al. 2001; DeGrado et al. 2002).
Scan acquisition
• Fasting of 4 h is suggested
• 4 or 5 MBq\Kg of 11C-choline iv/300 MBq 18F-fluorocholine iv
• Uptake time 2–5 min for 11C-choline/30 min for 18F-fluorocholine
• Acquisition starts from the pelvis for 11C-choline/head-thorax for 18F-fluorocholine
Clinical indications in oncology (Figs. 20, 21, 22, 23, and 24)
The main clinical application of choline is in prostate cancer patients for staging and restaging the disease in case of biochemical recurrence after primary treatment (Kryza et al. 2008; Evangelista et al. 2013).
PSMA
Names: [68Ga] prostate-specific membrane antigen ligand; 68Ga-PSMA
Biodistribution and metabolism (Fig. 25)
Prostate specific membrane antigen (PSMA), a tumour-associated antigen and type II transmembrane protein, is expressed on the membrane of prostatic epithelial cells and overexpressed on prostate tumour cells. Upon internalisation of the radiotracer, PSMA-expressing tumour cells can be detected during PET imaging (Heidenreich et al. 2014; Afshar-Oromieh et al. 2016; Demirci et al. 2016).
Scan acquisition
• Fasting of 4 h is suggested
• 2 or 3 MBq\Kg of 68Ga-PSMA iv
• Uptake time 60–100 min
• Acquisition starts from the pelvis
Clinical indications in oncology (Figs. 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, and 37)
The main clinical application of 68Ga-PSMA is in prostate cancer patients, namely initial diagnosis (Fendler et al. 2017), nodal staging (Schneider et al. 2016), restaging in case of biochemical recurrence (Calais et al. 2018; Maurer et al. 2016), and theranostic in case of 177Lu-PSMA treatment (Mottet et al. 2011; Zamboglou et al. 2016), or alfa emitters such as 225AcPSMA (Maurer et al. 2016).
DOPA
Names: L-3,4-Dihydroxy-6-[18F] fluorophenylalanine, 18F-DOPA, 18F-Fluoro-L-DOPA
Biodistribution and metabolism (Fig. 38)
18F-DOPA reflects all stages of DOPA transport, storage, and metabolism. The tracer is metabolised in the striatum, but also in peripheral tissues such as liver, kidneys, and lung (Rahbar et al. 2017).
Scan acquisition
• Fasting for more than 4 h
• 2–3 MBq/Kg of 18F-DOPA iv
• Uptake time 60 min for extra-cranial tumours. An additional acquisition of 10 min after injection is suggested in medullary thyroid cancer.
• Uptake time 10 min for primary brain tumours.
Clinical indications in oncology (Fig. 39, 40, 41, 42, and 43)
18F-DOPA is used in the detection of neuroendocrine tumours. It is the PET tracer of choice for recurrence detection in patients with medullary thyroid cancer and may play a role in the management of patients with pheochromocytoma and neuroblastoma. 18F-DOPA PET/CT is also used in recurrent glioma (Kratochwil et al. 2017; Chondrogiannis et al. 2013; Soussan et al. 2012; Amodru et al. 2018).
5-HTP
Names: [11C] 5-hydroxytryptophan; 11C-HTP
Biodistribution and metabolism (Fig. 44)
11C-HTP is taken up into neuroendocrine tumours cells by L-large amino acid transporter followed by decarboxylation to serotonin. The resulting end-product is then transported into storage vesicles through the vesicular monoamine transporter as well as went through the metabolic pathway of serotonin (Addeo et al. 2018; Piccardo et al. 2012).
Scan acquisition
• No special diet is required
• 370 MBq of 11C-HTP iv
• Uptake time 1 h
Clinical indications in oncology (Fig. 45)
11C-HTP is used in the detection of neuroendocrine tumours. Since the uptake is related to the serotonergic pathway, 11C-HTP is a possible alternative to 68Ga-DOTA-peptide or 18F-DOPA (Neels et al. 2006).
Somatostatin analogues
Names: [68Ga] (1,4,7,10-tetraazacyclododecane-N, N′, N″, N‴-tetraacetic acid)-1- (d)-Phe1-Thy3-octreotate (DOTATATE)- (d)-Phe1-Thy3-octreotide (DOTATOC)- NaI3-octreotide (DOTANOC)
Biodistribution and metabolism (Fig. 46)
Synthetic somatostatin peptides show long biological half-life and stronger and more specific affinity for somatostatin receptors available on the cellular surface of neuroendocrine tumours. DOTATATE, DOTATOC, and DOTANOC have different affinities for receptor subtypes (Kroiss et al. 2013; Bergeret et al. 2019).
Scan acquisition
• No special diet is required
• 2–3 MBq\Kg of 68Ga-DOTA-Peptide iv
• Uptake time 1 h
Clinical indications in oncology (Figs. 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, and 65)
In the management of NETs 68Ga-DOTA-conjugated peptide, PET/CT is used to localise primary tumours and detect sites of metastatic disease (staging); follow-up patients with known disease to detect residual, recurrent or progressive disease (restaging); determine somatostatin status; monitor response to therapy; and select patients with metastatic disease for peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (Skoura et al. 2016; Sundin 2018; Singh et al. 2018; Waseem et al. 2019).
FMISO
Names: 1-(2-Nitro-imidazolyl)-3-[18F] fluoro-2-propanol; 18F-FMISO
Biodistribution and metabolism (Fig. 66)
Nitro-group are postulated to undergo reduction in hypoxic condition (pO2 ≤ 2–3 mmHg), forming highly reactive oxygen radicals that subsequently bind covalently to macromolecules inside the cells (Visser et al. 2014; Orlefors et al. 2005).
18F-FMISO is relatively hydrophilic and diffuses across cell membranes, showing a passive distribution in normal tissues, resulting in slow clearance kinetics and a high lipophilicity, resulting in substantially high background.
Scan acquisition
• Fasting for at least 2 h
• 6 MBq\Kg of 18F-FMISO iv
• Uptake time 3–4 h
Clinical indications in oncology (Fig. 67)
PET-CT with 18F-FMISO is a non-invasive method for detecting and characterising hypoxia in several tumours. Ischemia in tumours is associated with a poor prognosis, increased invasion rate, metastasis, and resistance to chemo- and radiation therapy (Institute NC 2013; Nehmeh et al. 2008; Gagel et al. 2006; Hirata et al. 2012; Lin et al. 2008; Lopci et al. 2014; Reischl et al. 2007; Wack et al. 2015).
FAZA
Names: 1-(5-[18F] Fluoro-5-deoxy-α-D-arabinofuranosyl)-2-Nitroimidazole; 18F-FAZA
Biodistribution and metabolism (Fig. 66)
F-18 FAZA is a 2-nitroimidazole compound (reduced in hypoxic cellular media) with a sugar addition moiety showing more water solubility and better pharmacokinetics compared to 18F-FMISO (Zips et al. 2012; Bollineni et al. 2013; Bollineni et al. 2014).
Scan acquisition
• No special diet is required
• 370 MBq of 18F-FAZA iv
• Uptake time 2 h
Clinical indications in oncology (Fig. 68)
The indications are similar to 18F-FMISO (Reischl et al. 2007; Wack et al. 2015; Zips et al. 2012).
NAF
Names: [18F]-Sodium fluoride; 18F-NaF
Biodistribution and metabolism (Fig. 69)
Fluoride ions are deposited in the bone matrix and reflect: bone remodelling and blood flow. The target organ is bone, but approximately 20% is excreted through the kidney in the urine in the first 1-2 h (Bruine de Bruin et al. 2015; Beheshti et al. 2015).
Scan acquisition
• No special diet is required but good hydration is important
• 50–200 MBq of 18F-NaF iv
• Uptake time 20–60 min
Clinical indications in oncology (Figs. 70 and 71)
The indications are those of 99mTc-labelled diphosphonate bone scintigraphy. 18F-NaF PET/CT is more sensitive than bone scintigraphy, for most indications. The choice of PET or SPECT depends on the availability of the radiopharmaceuticals, PET/CT devices, and costs (Lofgren et al. n.d.).
Conclusion
The constant growth of PET/CT including the increasing use of novel non-FDG PET/CT radiopharmaceuticals in cancer patients creates a need for training in the proper interpretation of complex imaging studies with compounds that have very different biodistribution, normal variants, and pitfalls. In addition, the use of several of these non-FDG PET radiopharmaceuticals, such as 68Ga-PSMA and 68Ga-DOTA peptides, constitutes an integral part of the evaluation of patients with cancer for theranostics. As this further increases the radiopharmaceuticals’ clinical relevance, there is also the need for accurate interpretation of non-FDG PET/CT studies.
Acknowledgements
The authors are very grateful to Pr Ora Israel and Dr Sugitha Sureshkumar for their suggestions and careful and meticulous reading of the paper.
Adherence to national and international regulations
Yes
Abbreviations
- 5-HTTP
5-Hydroxytryptophan
- BCR
Biochemical recurrence
- DOPA
Dihydroxyphenylalanine
- DOTANOC
Tetraazacyclododecane-tetraacetic acid NaI3-octreotide
- DOTATATE
Tetraazacyclododecane-tetraacetic acid (d)-Phe1-Thy3-octreotate
- DOTATOC
Tetraazacyclododecane-tetraacetic acid (d)-Phe1-Thy3-octreotide
- ER
Oestrogen receptors
- FAZA
Fluorodeoxyarabinofuranosyl-nitroimidazole
- FDG
Fluorodeoxyglucose
- FES
Fluoroestradiol
- FET
Fluoroethyltyrosine
- FLAIR
Fluid attenuated inversion recovery
- FLT
Fluorothymidine
- FMISO
Fluoro-propanol-nitroimidazole
- HCC
Hepatocellular carcinoma
- HER2
Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2
- MBq
Megabecquerel
- MIBI
Methoxyisobutylisonitrile
- MIP
Maximum intensity projection
- MRI
Magnetic resonance imaging
- MTC
Medullary thyroid cancer
- NAF
Sodium fluoride
- NET
Neuroendocrine tumours
- NSCLC
Non-small cell lung cancer
- PET/CT
Positron emission tomography/computed tomography
- PR
Progesterone receptor
- PSAdt
Prostate-specific antigen doubling time
- PSMA
Prostate-specific antigen
- PSMA
Prostate-specific membrane antigen
- SPECT
Single-photon emission computed tomography
- TTR
Time to relapse
- y.o.
Years old
Authors’ contributions
All authors contributed equally to the work. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Funding
No
Availability of data and materials
Yes (own data and materials)
Ethics approval and consent to participate
Yes
Consent for publication
Yes
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Footnotes
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Contributor Information
Francesco Giammarile, Email: francesco.giammarile@gmail.com.
Paolo Castellucci, Email: paolo.castellucci@aosp.bo.it.
Rudi Dierckx, Email: r.a.dierckx@umcg.nl.
Enrique Estrada Lobato, Email: E.Estrada-Lobato@iaea.org.
Mohsen Farsad, Email: MOHSEN.FARSAD@sabes.it.
Roland Hustinx, Email: rhustinx@chu.ulg.ac.be.
Amirreza Jalilian, Email: A.Jalilian@iaea.org.
Olivier Pellet, Email: O.Pellet@iaea.org.
Susana Rossi, Email: susana.rossi@cudim.org.
Diana Paez, Email: D.Paez@iaea.org.
References
- Abe K, Hayashi K, Sasaki M, Koga H, Kaneko K, Sawamoto H, et al. O-(2-[18F]fluoroethyl)-L-tyrosine (18F-FET) uptake in mouse thymoma cells, and its biodistribution in mice and human volunteers. Acta Radiol. 2006;47(10):1042–1048. doi: 10.1080/02841850600979055. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Addeo P, Poncet G, Goichot B, Leclerc L, Brigand C, Mutter D, et al. The added diagnostic value of (18)F-Fluorodihydroxyphenylalanine PET/CT in the preoperative work-up of small bowel neuroendocrine tumors. J Gastrointest Surg. 2018;22(4):722–730. doi: 10.1007/s11605-017-3645-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Afshar-Oromieh A, Hetzheim H, Kubler W, Kratochwil C, Giesel FL, Hope TA, et al. Radiation dosimetry of (68)Ga-PSMA-11 (HBED-CC) and preliminary evaluation of optimal imaging timing. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2016;43(9):1611–1620. doi: 10.1007/s00259-016-3419-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Albert NL, Weller M, Suchorska B, Galldiks N, Soffietti R, Kim MM, et al. Response assessment in neuro-oncology working group and European association for neuro-oncology recommendations for the clinical use of PET imaging in gliomas. Neuro-Oncology. 2016;18(9):1199–1208. doi: 10.1093/neuonc/now058. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Amodru V, Guerin C, Delcourt S, Romanet P, Loundou A, Viana B, et al. Quantitative (18)F-DOPA PET/CT in pheochromocytoma: the relationship between tumor secretion and its biochemical phenotype. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2018;45(2):278–282. doi: 10.1007/s00259-017-3833-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Beheshti M, Mottaghy FM, Paycha F, Behrendt FFF, Van den Wyngaert T, Fogelman I, et al. (18)F-NaF PET/CT: EANM procedure guidelines for bone imaging. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2015;42(11):1767–1777. doi: 10.1007/s00259-015-3138-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bergeret S, Charbit J, Ansquer C, Bera G, Chanson P, Lussey-Lepoutre C. Novel PET tracers: added value for endocrine disorders. Endocrine. 2019;64(1):14–30. doi: 10.1007/s12020-019-01895-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bollineni VR, Kerner GS, Pruim J, Steenbakkers RJ, Wiegman EM, Koole MJ, et al. PET imaging of tumor hypoxia using 18F-fluoroazomycin arabinoside in stage III-IV non-small cell lung cancer patients. J Nucl Med. 2013;54(8):1175–1180. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.112.115014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bollineni VR, Koole MJ, Pruim J, Brouwer CL, Wiegman EM, Groen HJ, et al. Dynamics of tumor hypoxia assessed by 18F-FAZA PET/CT in head and neck and lung cancer patients during chemoradiation: possible implications for radiotherapy treatment planning strategies. Radiother Oncol. 2014;113(2):198–203. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2014.10.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bruine de Bruin L, Bollineni VR, Wachters JE, Schuuring E, van Hemel BM, van der Wal JE, et al. Assessment of hypoxic subvolumes in laryngeal cancer with (18)F-fluoroazomycinarabinoside ((18)F-FAZA)-PET/CT scanning and immunohistochemistry. Radiother Oncol. 2015;117(1):106–112. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2015.07.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Calais J, Fendler WP, Eiber M, Gartmann J, Chu FI, Nickols NG, et al. Impact of (68)Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT on the management of prostate cancer patients with biochemical recurrence. J Nucl Med. 2018;59(3):434–441. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.117.202945. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Chondrogiannis S, Marzola MC, Al-Nahhas A, Venkatanarayana TD, Mazza A, Opocher G, et al. Normal biodistribution pattern and physiologic variants of 18F-DOPA PET imaging. Nucl Med Commun. 2013;34(12):1141–1149. doi: 10.1097/MNM.0000000000000008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Davis J, Yano Y, Cahoon J, Budinger TF. Preparation of 11C-methyl iodide and L-[S-methyl-11C]methionine by an automated continuous flow process. Int J Appl Radiat Isot. 1982;33(5):363–369. doi: 10.1016/0020-708X(82)90150-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- DeGrado TR, Coleman RE, Wang S, Baldwin SW, Orr MD, Robertson CN, et al. Synthesis and evaluation of 18F-labeled choline as an oncologic tracer for positron emission tomography: initial findings in prostate cancer. Cancer Res. 2001;61(1):110–117. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- DeGrado TR, Reiman RE, Price DT, Wang S, Coleman RE. Pharmacokinetics and radiation dosimetry of 18F-fluorocholine. J Nucl Med. 2002;43(1):92–96. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Deloar HM, Fujiwara T, Nakamura T, Itoh M, Imai D, Miyake M, et al. Estimation of internal absorbed dose of L-[methyl-11C]methionine using whole-body positron emission tomography. Eur J Nucl Med. 1998;25(6):629–633. doi: 10.1007/s002590050265. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Demirci E, Sahin OE, Ocak M, Akovali B, Nematyazar J, Kabasakal L. Normal distribution pattern and physiological variants of 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT imaging. Nucl Med Commun. 2016;37(11):1169–1179. doi: 10.1097/MNM.0000000000000566. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Evangelista L, Guttilla A, Zattoni F, Muzzio PC, Zattoni F. Utility of choline positron emission tomography/computed tomography for lymph node involvement identification in intermediate- to high-risk prostate cancer: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis. Eur Urol. 2013;63(6):1040–1048. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2012.09.039. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Fendler WP, Eiber M, Beheshti M, Bomanji J, Ceci F, Cho S, et al. (68)Ga-PSMA PET/CT: Joint EANM and SNMMI procedure guideline for prostate cancer imaging: version 1.0. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2017;44(6):1014–1024. doi: 10.1007/s00259-017-3670-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gagel B, Reinartz P, Demirel C, Kaiser HJ, Zimny M, Piroth M, et al. [18F] fluoromisonidazole and [18F] fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in response evaluation after chemo-/radiotherapy of non-small-cell lung cancer: a feasibility study. BMC Cancer. 2006;6:51. doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-6-51. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Galldiks N, Stoffels G, Filss C, Rapp M, Blau T, Tscherpel C, et al. The use of dynamic O-(2-18F-fluoroethyl)-l-tyrosine PET in the diagnosis of patients with progressive and recurrent glioma. Neuro-Oncology. 2015;17(9):1293–1300. doi: 10.1093/neuonc/nov088. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Grierson JR, Shields AF. Radiosynthesis of 3'-deoxy-3'-[(18)F]fluorothymidine: [(18)F]FLT for imaging of cellular proliferation in vivo. Nucl Med Biol. 2000;27(2):143–156. doi: 10.1016/S0969-8051(99)00104-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hain SF, Maisey MN. Positron emission tomography for urological tumours. BJU Int. 2003;92(2):159–164. doi: 10.1046/j.1464-410X.2003.04284.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Harris SM, Davis JC, Snyder SE, Butch ER, Vavere AL, Kocak M, et al. Evaluation of the biodistribution of 11C-methionine in children and young adults. J Nucl Med. 2013;54(11):1902–1908. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.112.118125. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Heidenreich A, Bastian PJ, Bellmunt J, Bolla M, Joniau S, van der Kwast T, et al. EAU guidelines on prostate cancer. Part II: Treatment of advanced, relapsing, and castration-resistant prostate cancer. Eur Urol. 2014;65(2):467–479. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2013.11.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hirata K, Terasaka S, Shiga T, Hattori N, Magota K, Kobayashi H, et al. (1)(8)F-Fluoromisonidazole positron emission tomography may differentiate glioblastoma multiforme from less malignant gliomas. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2012;39(5):760–770. doi: 10.1007/s00259-011-2037-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ho CL, Yu SC, Yeung DW. 11C-acetate PET imaging in hepatocellular carcinoma and other liver masses. J Nucl Med. 2003;44(2):213–221. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Institute NC. Investigator’s Brochure for [18F] fluoromisonidazole, 1H-1-(3-[18F]-fluoro-2-hydroxy-propyl)-2-nitro-imidazole, [18F]FMISO. An investigational positron emission tomography (PET) radiopharmaceutical for injection and intended for use as an in vivo diagnostic for imaging hypoxia in tumors. NIH;5th ed, 2013.
- Karanikas G, Beheshti M. (1)(1)C-acetate PET/CT imaging: physiologic uptake, variants, and pitfalls. PET Clin. 2014;9(3):339–344. doi: 10.1016/j.cpet.2014.03.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kenny L, Coombes RC, Vigushin DM, Al-Nahhas A, Shousha S, Aboagye EO. Imaging early changes in proliferation at 1 week post chemotherapy: a pilot study in breast cancer patients with 3'-deoxy-3'-[18F]fluorothymidine positron emission tomography. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2007;34(9):1339–1347. doi: 10.1007/s00259-007-0379-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kratochwil C, Bruchertseifer F, Rathke H, Bronzel M, Apostolidis C, Weichert W, et al. Targeted alpha-therapy of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer with (225)Ac-PSMA-617: dosimetry estimate and empiric dose finding. J Nucl Med. 2017;58(10):1624–1631. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.117.191395. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kroiss A, Putzer D, Decristoforo C, Uprimny C, Warwitz B, Nilica B, et al. 68Ga-DOTA-TOC uptake in neuroendocrine tumour and healthy tissue: differentiation of physiological uptake and pathological processes in PET/CT. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2013;40(4):514–523. doi: 10.1007/s00259-012-2309-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kryza D, Tadino V, Filannino MA, Villeret G, Lemoucheux L. Fully automated [18F]fluorocholine synthesis in the TracerLab MX FDG Coincidence synthesizer. Nucl Med Biol. 2008;35(2):255–260. doi: 10.1016/j.nucmedbio.2007.11.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kunz M, Thon N, Eigenbrod S, Hartmann C, Egensperger R, Herms J, et al. Hot spots in dynamic (18)FET-PET delineate malignant tumor parts within suspected WHO grade II gliomas. Neuro-Oncology. 2011;13(3):307–316. doi: 10.1093/neuonc/noq196. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Liao GJ, Clark AS, Schubert EK, Mankoff DA. 18F-Fluoroestradiol PET: current status and potential future clinical applications. J Nucl Med. 2016;57(8):1269–1275. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.116.175596. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lin Z, Mechalakos J, Nehmeh S, Schoder H, Lee N, Humm J, et al. The influence of changes in tumor hypoxia on dose-painting treatment plans based on 18F-FMISO positron emission tomography. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2008;70(4):1219–1228. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2007.09.050. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Linden HM, Kurland BF, Peterson LM, Schubert EK, Gralow JR, Specht JM, et al. Fluoroestradiol positron emission tomography reveals differences in pharmacodynamics of aromatase inhibitors, tamoxifen, and fulvestrant in patients with metastatic breast cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2011;17(14):4799–4805. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-10-3321. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Liu RS, Chang CP, Chu LS, Chu YK, Hsieh HJ, Chang CW, et al. PET imaging of brain astrocytoma with 1-11C-acetate. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2006;33(4):420–427. doi: 10.1007/s00259-005-0023-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Löfgren Johan, Mortensen Jann, Rasmussen Sine H., Madsen Claus, Loft Annika, Hansen Adam E., Oturai Peter, Jensen Karl Erik, Mørk Mette Louise, Reichkendler Michala, Højgaard Liselotte, Fischer Barbara M. A Prospective Study Comparing99mTc-Hydroxyethylene-Diphosphonate Planar Bone Scintigraphy and Whole-Body SPECT/CT with18F-Fluoride PET/CT and18F-Fluoride PET/MRI for Diagnosing Bone Metastases. Journal of Nuclear Medicine. 2017;58(11):1778–1785. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.116.189183. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lopci E, Grassi I, Chiti A, Nanni C, Cicoria G, Toschi L, et al. PET radiopharmaceuticals for imaging of tumor hypoxia: a review of the evidence. Am J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2014;4(4):365–384. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Maurer T, Gschwend JE, Rauscher I, Souvatzoglou M, Haller B, Weirich G, et al. Diagnostic efficacy of (68)Gallium-PSMA positron emission tomography compared to conventional imaging for lymph node sStaging of 130 consecutive patients with intermediate to high risk prostate cancer. J Urol. 2016;195(5):1436–1443. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2015.12.025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mitterhauser M, Wadsak W, Krcal A, Schmaljohann J, Eidherr H, Schmid A, et al. New aspects on the preparation of [11C]Methionine--a simple and fast online approach without preparative HPLC. Appl Radiat Isot. 2005;62(3):441–445. doi: 10.1016/j.apradiso.2004.07.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mottet N, Bellmunt J, Bolla M, Joniau S, Mason M, Matveev V, et al. EAU guidelines on prostate cancer. Part II: Treatment of advanced, relapsing, and castration-resistant prostate cancer. Eur Urol. 2011;59(4):572–583. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2011.01.025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Neels OC, Jager PL, Koopmans KP, Eriks E, de Vries EG, Kema IP, et al. Development of a reliable remote-controlled synthesis of β-[11C]-5-hydroxy-L-tryptophan on a Zymark robotic system. J Lab Compounds Radiopharmaceuticals. 2006;49(10):889–895. doi: 10.1002/jlcr.1110. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Nehmeh SA, Lee NY, Schroder H, Squire O, Zanzonico PB, Erdi YE, et al. Reproducibility of intratumor distribution of (18)F-fluoromisonidazole in head and neck cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2008;70(1):235–242. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2007.08.036. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Oh SJ, Mosdzianowski C, Chi DY, Kim JY, Kang SH, Ryu JS, et al. Fully automated synthesis system of 3'-deoxy-3'-[18F]fluorothymidine. Nucl Med Biol. 2004;31(6):803–809. doi: 10.1016/j.nucmedbio.2004.01.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Orlefors H, Sundin A, Garske U, Juhlin C, Oberg K, Skogseid B, et al. Whole-body 11C-5-hydroxytryptophan positron emission tomography as a universal imaging technique for neuroendocrine tumors: comparison with somatostatin receptor scintigraphy and computed tomography. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2005;90(6):3392–3400. doi: 10.1210/jc.2004-1938. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Park JW, Kim JH, Kim SK, Kang KW, Park KW, Choi JI, et al. A prospective evaluation of 18F-FDG and 11C-acetate PET/CT for detection of primary and metastatic hepatocellular carcinoma. J Nucl Med. 2008;49(12):1912–1921. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.108.055087. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Peterson LM, Kurland BF, Link JM, Schubert EK, Stekhova S, Linden HM, et al. Factors influencing the uptake of 18F-fluoroestradiol in patients with estrogen receptor positive breast cancer. Nucl Med Biol. 2011;38(7):969–978. doi: 10.1016/j.nucmedbio.2011.03.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Piccardo A, Lopci E, Conte M, Garaventa A, Foppiani L, Altrinetti V, et al. Comparison of 18F-dopa PET/CT and 123I-MIBG scintigraphy in stage 3 and 4 neuroblastoma: a pilot study. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2012;39(1):57–71. doi: 10.1007/s00259-011-1938-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Poulsen SH, Urup T, Grunnet K, Christensen IJ, Larsen VA, Jensen ML, et al. The prognostic value of FET PET at radiotherapy planning in newly diagnosed glioblastoma. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2017;44(3):373–381. doi: 10.1007/s00259-016-3494-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rahbar K, Ahmadzadehfar H, Kratochwil C, Haberkorn U, Schafers M, Essler M, et al. German multicenter study investigating 177Lu-PSMA-617 radioligand therapy in advanced prostate cancer patients. J Nucl Med. 2017;58(1):85–90. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.116.183194. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Reischl G, Dorow DS, Cullinane C, Katsifis A, Roselt P, Binns D, et al. Imaging of tumor hypoxia with [124I]IAZA in comparison with [18F]FMISO and [18F]FAZA--first small animal PET results. J Pharm Pharm Sci. 2007;10(2):203–211. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sandblom G, Sorensen J, Lundin N, Haggman M, Malmstrom PU. Positron emission tomography with C11-acetate for tumor detection and localization in patients with prostate-specific antigen relapse after radical prostatectomy. Urology. 2006;67(5):996–1000. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2005.11.044. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Schneider B, Zhu H, Ma X, Cheng Z, Iagaru A, Kopka K, et al. Preparation and chemical analysis of clinical-grade 68Ga-PSMA-HBED-CC, an emerging tracer for imaging of prostate cancers. J Nucl Med. 2016;57(supplement 2):1117. [Google Scholar]
- Seltzer MA, Jahan SA, Sparks R, Stout DB, Satyamurthy N, Dahlbom M, et al. Radiation dose estimates in humans for (11)C-acetate whole-body PET. J Nucl Med. 2004;45(7):1233–1236. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Shankar LK. The clinical evaluation of novel imaging methods for cancer management. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2012;9(12):738–744. doi: 10.1038/nrclinonc.2012.186. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Singh S, Poon R, Wong R, Metser U. 68Ga PET imaging in patients with neuroendocrine tumors: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Nucl Med. 2018;43(11):802–810. doi: 10.1097/RLU.0000000000002276. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Skoura E, Michopoulou S, Mohmaduvesh M, Panagiotidis E, Al Harbi M, Toumpanakis C, et al. The impact of 68Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT imaging on management of patients with neuroendocrine tumors: experience from a national referral center in the United Kingdom. J Nucl Med. 2016;57(1):34–40. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.115.166017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Soussan M, Nataf V, Kerrou K, Grahek D, Pascal O, Talbot JN, et al. Added value of early 18F-FDOPA PET/CT acquisition time in medullary thyroid cancer. Nucl Med Commun. 2012;33(7):775–779. doi: 10.1097/MNM.0b013e3283543304. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sundin A. Novel functional imaging of neuroendocrine tumors. Endocrinol Metab Clin N Am. 2018;47(3):505–523. doi: 10.1016/j.ecl.2018.04.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Turcotte E, Wiens LW, Grierson JR, Peterson LM, Wener MH, Vesselle H. Toxicology evaluation of radiotracer doses of 3'-deoxy-3'-[18F]fluorothymidine (18F-FLT) for human PET imaging: laboratory analysis of serial blood samples and comparison to previously investigated therapeutic FLT doses. BMC Nucl Med. 2007;7:3. doi: 10.1186/1471-2385-7-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Unterrainer M, Schweisthal F, Suchorska B, Wenter V, Schmid-Tannwald C, Fendler WP, et al. Serial 18F-FET PET imaging of primarily 18F-FET-negative glioma: does it make sense? J Nucl Med. 2016;57(8):1177–1182. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.115.171033. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- van Kruchten M, de Vries EGE, Brown M, de Vries EFJ, Glaudemans A, Dierckx R, et al. PET imaging of oestrogen receptors in patients with breast cancer. Lancet Oncol. 2013;14(11):e465–ee75. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(13)70292-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- van Kruchten M, Glaudemans AW, de Vries EF, Beets-Tan RG, Schroder CP, Dierckx RA, et al. PET imaging of estrogen receptors as a diagnostic tool for breast cancer patients presenting with a clinical dilemma. J Nucl Med. 2012;53(2):182–190. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.111.092734. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- van Kruchten M, Hospers GA, Glaudemans AW, Hollema H, Arts HJ, Reyners AK. Positron emission tomography imaging of oestrogen receptor-expression in endometrial stromal sarcoma supports oestrogen receptor-targeted therapy: case report and review of the literature. Eur J Cancer. 2013;49(18):3850–3855. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2013.08.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Venema CM, Apollonio G, Hospers GA, Schroder CP, Dierckx RA, de Vries EF, et al. Recommendations and technical aspects of 16alpha-[18F]Fluoro-17beta-estradiol PET to image the estrogen receptor in vivo: the Groningen experience. Clin Nucl Med. 2016;41(11):844–851. doi: 10.1097/RLU.0000000000001347. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Vesselle H, Grierson J, Peterson LM, Muzi M, Mankoff DA, Krohn KA. 18F-Fluorothymidine radiation dosimetry in human PET imaging studies. J Nucl Med. 2003;44(9):1482–1488. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Visser AK, Ramakrishnan NK, Willemsen AT, Di Gialleonardo V, de Vries EF, Kema IP, et al. [(11)C]5-HTP and microPET are not suitable for pharmacodynamic studies in the rodent brain. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2014;34(1):118–125. doi: 10.1038/jcbfm.2013.171. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wack LJ, Monnich D, van Elmpt W, Zegers CM, Troost EG, Zips D, et al. Comparison of [18F]-FMISO, [18F]-FAZA and [18F]-HX4 for PET imaging of hypoxia--a simulation study. Acta Oncol. 2015;54(9):1370–1377. doi: 10.3109/0284186X.2015.1067721. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Waseem N, Aparici CM, Kunz PL. Evaluating the role of theranostics in grade 3 neuroendocrine neoplasms. J Nucl Med. 2019;60(7):882–891. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.118.217851. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zamboglou C, Wieser G, Hennies S, Rempel I, Kirste S, Soschynski M, et al. MRI versus (6)(8)Ga-PSMA PET/CT for gross tumour volume delineation in radiation treatment planning of primary prostate cancer. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2016;43(5):889–897. doi: 10.1007/s00259-015-3257-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zips D, Zophel K, Abolmaali N, Perrin R, Abramyuk A, Haase R, et al. Exploratory prospective trial of hypoxia-specific PET imaging during radiochemotherapy in patients with locally advanced head-and-neck cancer. Radiother Oncol. 2012;105(1):21–28. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2012.08.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
Yes (own data and materials)