ABSTRACT
Concentrations of anidulafungin and micafungin were determined in eight different tissues obtained during autopsy of four deceased individuals who had been treated with anidulafungin and of seven who had received micafungin. The largest amounts were recovered from liver, with anidulafungin concentrations of 11.01 to 66.50 μg/g and micafungin levels of 0.36 to 5.53 μg/g (0.65 μg/g 30 days after the last administration). The lowest anidulafungin levels were measured in skeletal muscle, and the lowest micafungin concentrations were in kidneys.
KEYWORDS: echinocandins, antifungal target-site penetration, tissue distribution, invasive candidiasis
TEXT
The echinocandins anidulafungin and micafungin are recommended for treatment of invasive candidiasis, because they are highly effective against candidemia (1–5). However, knowledge of their concentrations in various human tissues is scarce (6, 7). Therefore, we quantified anidulafungin and micafungin concentrations in eight tissues of deceased adults.
(Some of the data in this study were presented at the 25th Scientific Symposium of the Austrian Pharmacological Society [Innsbruck, Austria; 2019].)
The study protocol was approved by the local ethics committee. Tissue samples were obtained during routine autopsies of patients who had been treated with anidulafungin or micafungin within 30 days prior to death and who on admission had granted permission for scientific use of residual specimens. Between death and autopsy, the bodies were kept at 4°C for up to 85 h. Anidulafungin and micafungin concentrations were quantified in thyroid, lung, myocardium, spleen, liver, kidney, pancreas, and skeletal muscle. The echinocandins were extracted and quantified as described previously for brain (8). In brief, 0.2 g of tissue was homogenized with acetonitrile and methanol, and concentrations were measured with high-performance liquid chromatography and UV detection (8, 9). The external standards consisted of animal tissue spiked with anidulafungin or micafungin. A lower limit of quantification (LLOQ) of 0.10 μg/g was achieved for anidulafungin in all tissues but skeletal muscle (LLOQ = 0.05 μg/g) and for micafungin in all tissues but myocardium, kidney, and pancreas (LLOQ = 0.20 μg/g). The process efficiency amounted to 40% to 80%. Postmortem stability of echinocandins was assessed by incubation of patient tissue at 4°C for 96 h. Anidulafungin was stable in all tissues and micafungin in all tissues but spleen, where the concentration declined by 39% within 96 h.
For statistical calculations, we used IBM (Armonk, NY, USA) SPSS Statistics software version 26.0. The significance of the differences between anidulafungin and micafungin concentrations was analyzed by Mann-Whitney U test. Correlations between anidulafungin and micafungin concentrations and body weight, daily dose, cumulative dose, interval between the last administration and death, and interval from death to autopsy were assessed using linear regression.
Tissue samples were obtained from four females (median [range], 69 [45 to 74] years old) who had been treated with anidulafungin and from two females and five males (58 [38 to 76] years old) who had received micafungin. Whereas median cumulative doses were similar in both treatment groups, the median interval between the last administration and death was much shorter in the anidulafungin group than in the micafungin group, where it was longer than 100 h in most patients. This might explain the significantly higher tissue concentrations of anidulafungin. Nevertheless, anidulafungin tissue concentrations in patient 2, who died 290 h after the last infusion (cumulative dose, 1,800 mg), exceeded micafungin tissue concentrations of patient 6, who died 230 h after the last administration (cumulative dose, 5,300 mg). Linear regression did not reveal any correlation between the anidulafungin and micafungin concentrations and the analyzed demographic characteristics and treatment parameters.
The largest amounts of anidulafungin were recovered from the liver, followed by spleen, lung, and pancreas (median > 10 μg/g) (Table 1). In kidney, thyroid, myocardium, and skeletal muscle, anidulafungin concentrations were lower (median <10 μg/g) (Table 1). The highest micafungin concentrations were measured in liver, thyroid, and lung (median > 0.25 μg/g) (Table 2). Lower concentrations were found in myocardium, skeletal muscle, and kidney (median < 0.20 μg/g) (Table 2). Twelve days after the last administration, anidulafungin was detected in all tissues of patient 2, and concentrations between 0.51 and 11.01 μg/g were determined. Notably, in the liver of patient 5, micafungin could be measured even 30 days after the last administration (0.65 μg/g).
TABLE 1.
Patient characteristics and anidulafungin concentrations in autopsy samplesa
| Characteristic | Patient no. |
Median (range) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | ||
| Wt (kg) | 135 | 85 | 43 | 50 | 67.50 (43–135) |
| Cumulative dose (mg/kg) | 5.19 | 21.18 | 34.88 | 24.00 | 22.59 (5.19–34.88) |
| Treatment duration (days) | 6 | 7 | 14 | 11 | 9 (6–14) |
| Interval between last AFG administration and death (h) | 32 | 299 | 11.50 | 29 | 30.50 (11.50–299) |
| Interval between death and sampling (h) | 14 | 11 | 15 | 9 | 12.50 (9–15) |
| Total interval last AFG administration and sampling (h) | 46 | 310 | 26.50 | 38 | 42.00 (26.50–310) |
| Main diagnoses | COPD, pneumonia | DLBCL, septic shock | DLBCL, st. p. HSCT, ileus, pneumonia | Sepsis, peritonitis after sigmoid perforation | |
| Indication for AFG therapy | Empiric treatment | Invasive candidiasis (candidemia) | Invasive aspergillosis (AFG treatment in combination with voriconazole) | Invasive candidiasis (candidemia) | |
| Anidulafungin concn (μg/g) in: | |||||
| Thyroid | 2.10 | 1.02 | 9.74 | 12.75 | 5.92 (1.02–12.75) |
| Lung | 3.56 | 5.08 | 28.76 | 20.31 | 12.69 (3.56–28.76) |
| Myocardium | 1.21 | 0.98 | 8.17 | 5.25 | 3.23 (0.98–8.17) |
| Spleen | 6.16 | 2.98 | 36.68 | 24.43 | 15.30 (2.98–36.68) |
| Liver | 17.33 | 11.01 | 58.17 | 66.50 | 37.75 (11.01–66.50) |
| Kidney | 2.72 | 1.25 | 10.23 | 12.67 | 6.47 (1.25–12.67) |
| Pancreas | 4.08 | 1.97 | 18.92 | 16.77 | 10.43 (1.97–18.92) |
| Skeletal muscleb | 1.14 | 0.51 | NA | 7.70 | 1.14 (0.51–7.70) |
AFG, anidulafungin; COPD, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; DLBCL, diffuse large B-cell lymphoma; st. p., status post; HSCT, hematopoietic stem cell transplantation; NA, not available (sampling missed).
Rectus abdominis muscle; lower limit of quantification for thyroid, lung, myocardium, spleen, liver, kidney, and pancreas is 0.10 μg/g, and that for skeletal muscle is 0.05 μg/g.
TABLE 2.
Patient characteristics and micafungin concentrations in autopsy samplesa
| Characteristic | Patient no. |
Median (range) | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | ||
| Wt (kg) | 80 | 92 | 80 | 60 | 50 | 81 | 85 | 80 (50–92) |
| Cumulative dose (mg/kg) | 13.75 | 57.61 | 22.50 | 8.33 | 27.00 | 3.70 | 47.06 | 22.50 (3.70–57.61) |
| Treatment duration (days) | 19 | 28 | 18 | 4 | 9 | 3 | 39 | 18 (3–39) |
| Interval between last MFG administration and death (h) | 712 | 230 | 110 | 24 | 148 | 324 | 235 | 230 (24–712) |
| Interval between death and sampling (h) | 58 | 85 | 38 | 74 | 20 | 80 | 29 | 58 (20–85) |
| Total interval last MFG administration and sampling (h) | 770 | 315 | 148 | 98 | 168 | 404 | 264 | 264 (98–770) |
| Main diagnoses | Burkitt-lymphoma relapse, st. p. HSCT | Wound infection (C. albicans), septic shock, osteomyelofibrosis | Cholangiocarcinoma, biliary-pleural fistula, sepsis | St. p. LuTX, ischemic stroke, pneumonia | T-cell lymphoma, cardiogenic shock | Fungal endophthalmitis, pneumonia, COPD | St. p. LTX, hepatic artery occlusion, wound infection | |
| Indication for MFG therapy | Empiric treatment | Invasive candidiasis (candidemia) | Invasive candidiasis (pleural empyema) | Empiric treatment | Empiric treatment | Invasive candidiasis (Candida endophthalmitis) | Suspected Candida cholangitis | |
| Micafungin concn (μg/g) in: | ||||||||
| Thyroid | <0.10 | 0.43 | 0.47 | 0.44 | <0.10 | <0.10 | 0.44 | 0.43 (<0.10–0.47) |
| Lung | <0.10 | 0.20 | 0.70 | 1.81 | 0.23 | 0.18 | 0.29 | 0.26 (<0.10–1.81) |
| Myocardium | <0.20 | <0.20 | 0.45 | 0.44 | <0.20 | <0.20 | 0.24 | 0.19 (<0.20–0.45) |
| Spleen | <0.10 | 0.13 | 0.73 | 1.44 | <0.10 | <0.10 | 0.31 | 0.22 (<0.10–1.44) |
| Liver | 0.65 | 3.14 | 5.53 | 2.57 | 0.36 | 0.36 | 3.31 | 2.86 (0.36–5.53) |
| Kidney | <0.20 | <0.20 | 0.50 | 0.77 | <0.20 | <0.20 | <0.20 | 0.13 (<0.20–0.77) |
| Pancreas | <0.20 | <0.20 | 0.46 | 0.26 | <0.20 | <0.20 | 0.44 | 0.15 (<0.20–0.46) |
| Skeletal muscleb | <0.10 | 1.78 | 0.18 | 0.13 | <0.10 | <0.10 | 0.18 | 0.16 (<0.10–1.78) |
MFG, micafungin; st. p., status post; HSCT, hematopoietic stem cell transplantation; C. albicans, Candida albicans; LuTX, lung transplantation; COPD, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; LTX, liver transplantation.
Rectus abdominis muscle; lower limit of quantification for thyroid, lung, spleen, liver and skeletal muscle is 0.10 μg/g and for myocardium, kidney and pancreas 0.20 μg/g.
Invasive candidiasis may affect various tissues, causing deep-seated candidiasis. Anidulafungin tissue concentrations approached or even exceeded therapeutic plasma levels (6). For our study population, however, no plasma levels were available.
MICs of anidulafungin and micafungin range from 0.008 to 2.0 μg/ml for most pathogenic Candida isolates (10). Anidulafungin tissue concentrations exceeded these values in almost all tissue samples.
The limited size and the heterogeneity of our study population are considerable limitations. We cannot rule out agonal or postmortem changes of echinocandin tissue concentrations. However, after a 96-h incubation at 4°C, concentrations remained unchanged in all tissues but spleen. Nevertheless, patients 6 and 10 presented comparatively low micafungin concentrations in their tissue samples, which were taken 85 h and 80 h after death, respectively. Furthermore, echinocandin extraction from autopsy samples might be slightly less effective than extraction from calibrators. In rats treated with [14C]anidulafungin, however, tissue concentrations were comparable (11). Anidulafungin and micafungin display plasma protein binding of 99.0% and 99.9%, respectively. Their binding to protein in tissue is unknown, but protein binding influences echinocandin activity in vitro (12, 13). Autopsy samples comprise different tissue compartments, such as extracellular matrix, various cells, and blood vessels. With our method, we could not detect echinocandins on a cellular or subcellular level.
In brain samples taken from our study population, we had measured anidulafungin concentrations of 0.21 to 2.34 μg/g and micafungin concentrations of 0.18 to 2.88 μg/g. These data were reported previously, together with concentrations in cerebrospinal fluid of critically ill patients, which were even lower than brain concentrations (8). Preclinical studies revealed anidulafungin and micafungin tissue concentrations and distribution comparable with our findings, but in rodents, the highest concentrations were measured in lung (11, 14–16). Clinical studies of bronchoalveolar lavage demonstrated echinocandin accumulation in alveolar macrophages (17–20). Anidulafungin concentrations in ascites fluid and in pleural effusion exceeded those in cerebrospinal fluid but were below plasma levels and the MICs for some pathogenic Candida strains (21). Human tissue distribution of amphotericin B displays a pattern similar to that of anidulafungin and micafungin, with accumulation in liver and spleen (22–24). Fluconazole and voriconazole appear to be distributed more homogeneously over different tissues (25, 26).
In conclusion, anidulafungin and micafungin reach high concentrations in liver, spleen, and lung, whereas concentrations in myocardium and skeletal muscle are low. Evaluation of the clinical impact of anidulafungin and micafungin target site penetration warrants clinical outcome studies.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
This study was supported by the Austrian Science Fund (FWF), grant number KLI 565-B31.
We thank Ramona Stern and Martina Jeske, Hospital Pharmacy, and Andreas Pomaroli, Transplant ICU, University Hospital, for anesthesia and intensive care, Innsbruck General Hospital and Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria, for logistic support. Thomas Nachtigall, Obersöchering, Germany, kindly donated the HPLC system and provided outstanding technical support. Animal tissues were kindly provided by Landmetzgerei Piegger, Sistrans, Austria, and by Leo Weiler, Assling, Austria.
R.B. has received an IIR grant from Pfizer, research support from Rokitan, Vienna, Austria, and a lecture fee from Basilea Pharmaceutica, Basel, Switzerland. He is a member of an advisory board of Merck Sharp & Dohme. The other authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.
REFERENCES
- 1.Gonzalez-Lara MF, Ostrosky-Zeichner L. 2020. Invasive candidiasis. Semin Respir Crit Care Med 41:3–12. doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1701215. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Pappas PG, Kauffman CA, Andes DR, Clancy CJ, Marr KA, Ostrosky-Zeichner L, Reboli AC, Schuster MG, Vazquez JA, Walsh TJ, Zaoutis TE, Sobel JD. 2016. Executive summary: Clinical practice guideline for the management of candidiasis: 2016 update by the Infectious Diseases Society of America. Clin Infect Dis 62:409–417. doi: 10.1093/cid/civ1194. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Martin-Loeches I, Antonelli M, Cuenca-Estrella M, Dimopoulos G, Einav S, De Waele JJ, Garnacho-Montero J, Kanj SS, Machado FR, Montravers P, Sakr Y, Sanguinetti M, Timsit JF, Bassetti M. 2019. ESICM/ESCMID task force on practical management of invasive candidiasis in critically ill patients. Intensive Care Med 45:789–805. doi: 10.1007/s00134-019-05599-w. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Tissot F, Agrawal S, Pagano L, Petrikkos G, Groll AH, Skiada A, Lass-Flörl C, Calandra T, Viscoli C, Herbrecht R. 2017. ECIL-6 guidelines for the treatment of invasive candidiasis, aspergillosis and mucormycosis in leukemia and hematopoietic stem cell transplant patients. Haematologica 102:433–444. doi: 10.3324/haematol.2016.152900. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Cornely OA, Bassetti M, Calandra T, Garbino J, Kullberg BJ, Lortholary O, Meersseman W, Akova M, Arendrup MC, Arikan-Akdagli S, Bille J, Castagnola E, Cuenca-Estrella M, Donnelly JP, Groll AH, Herbrecht R, Hope WW, Jensen HE, Lass-Flörl C, Petrikkos G, Richardson MD, Roilides E, Verweij PE, Viscoli C, Ullmann AJ, ESCMID Fungal Infection Study Group . 2012. ESCMID* guideline for the diagnosis and management of Candida diseases 2012: non-neutropenic adult patients. Clin Microbiol Infect 18:19–37. doi: 10.1111/1469-0691.12039. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Bellmann R, Smuszkiewicz P. 2017. Pharmacokinetics of antifungal drugs: practical implications for optimized treatment of patients. Infection 45:737–779. doi: 10.1007/s15010-017-1042-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Felton T, Troke PF, Hope WW. 2014. Tissue penetration of antifungal agents. Clin Microbiol Rev 27:68–88. doi: 10.1128/CMR.00046-13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Marx J, Welte R, Gasperetti T, Moser P, Beer R, Ortler M, Jeske M, Stern R, Pomaroli A, Joannidis M, Bellmann R. 2020. Anidulafungin and micafungin concentrations in cerebrospinal fluid and in cerebral cortex. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 64:e00275-20. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00275-20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Welte R, Oberacher H, Schwärzler B, Joannidis M, Bellmann R. 2020. Quantification of anidulafungin and micafungin in human body fluids by high performance-liquid chromatography with UV-detection. J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci 1139:121937. doi: 10.1016/j.jchromb.2019.121937. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Pfaller MA, Messer SA, Rhomberg PR, Castanheira M. 2017. CD101, a long-acting echinocandin, and comparator antifungal agents tested against a global collection of invasive fungal isolates in the SENTRY 2015 Antifungal Surveillance Program. Int J Antimicrob Agents 50:352–358. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2017.03.028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Damle B, Stogniew M, Dowell J. 2008. Pharmacokinetics and tissue distribution of anidulafungin in rats. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 52:2673–2676. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01596-07. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Ernst EJ, Roling EE, Petzold CR, Keele DJ, Klepser ME. 2002. In vitro activity of micafungin (FK-463) against Candida spp.: microdilution, time-kill, and postantifungal-effect studies. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 46:3846–3853. doi: 10.1128/AAC.46.12.3846-3853.2002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Odabasi Z, Paetznick V, Rex JH, Ostrosky-Zeichner L. 2007. Effects of serum on in vitro susceptibility testing of echinocandins. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 51:4214–4216. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01589-06. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Groll AH, Mickiene D, Petraitis V, Petraitiene R, Ibrahim KH, Piscitelli SC, Bekersky I, Walsh TJ. 2001. Compartmental pharmacokinetics and tissue distribution of the antifungal echinocandin lipopeptide micafungin (FK463) in rabbits. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 45:3322–3327. doi: 10.1128/AAC.45.12.3322-3327.2001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Niwa T, Yokota Y, Tokunaga A, Yamato Y, Kagayama A, Fujiwara T, Hatakeyama J, Anezaki M, Ohtsuka Y, Takagi A. 2004. Tissue distribution after intravenous dosing of micafungin, an antifungal drug, to rats. Biol Pharm Bull 27:1154–1156. doi: 10.1248/bpb.27.1154. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Groll AH, Mickiene D, Petraitiene R, Petraitis V, Lyman CA, Bacher JS, Piscitelli SC, Walsh TJ. 2001. Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic modeling of anidulafungin (LY303366): reappraisal of its efficacy in neutropenic animal models of opportunistic mycoses using optimal plasma sampling. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 45:2845–2855. doi: 10.1128/AAC.45.10.2845-2855.2001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Crandon JL, Banevicius MA, Fang AF, Crownover PH, Knauft RF, Pope JS, Russomanno JH, Shore E, Nicolau DP, Kuti JL. 2009. Bronchopulmonary disposition of intravenous voriconazole and anidulafungin given in combination to healthy adults. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 53:5102–5107. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01042-09. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Nicasio AM, Tessier PR, Nicolau DP, Knauft RF, Russomanno J, Shore E, Kuti JL. 2009. Bronchopulmonary disposition of micafungin in healthy adult volunteers. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 53:1218–1220. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01386-08. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Walsh TJ, Goutelle S, Jelliffe RW, Golden JA, Little EA, DeVoe C, Mickiene D, Hayes M, Conte JE. 2010. Intrapulmonary pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of micafungin in adult lung transplant patients. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 54:3451–3459. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01647-09. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Burkhardt O, Ellis S, Burhenne H, Kaever V, Hadem J, Kielstein JT, Welte T. 2009. High caspofungin levels in alveolar cells of a lung transplant patient with suspected pulmonary aspergillosis. Int J Antimicrob Agents 34:491–492. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2009.04.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Welte R, Eller P, Lorenz I, Joannidis M, Bellmann R. 2018. Anidulafungin pharmacokinetics in ascites fluid and pleural effusion of critically ill patients. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 62:e02326-17. doi: 10.1128/AAC.02326-17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Christiansen KJ, Bernard EM, Gold JW, Armstrong D. 1985. Distribution and activity of amphotericin B in humans. J Infect Dis 152:1037–1043. doi: 10.1093/infdis/152.5.1037. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Collette N, van der Auwera P, Lopez AP, Heymans C, Meunier F. 1989. Tissue concentrations and bioactivity of amphotericin B in cancer patients treated with amphotericin B-deoxycholate. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 33:362–368. doi: 10.1128/AAC.33.3.362. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Vogelsinger H, Weiler S, Djanani A, Kountchev J, Bellmann-Weiler R, Wiedermann CJ, Bellmann R. 2006. Amphotericin B tissue distribution in autopsy material after treatment with liposomal amphotericin B and amphotericin B colloidal dispersion. J Antimicrob Chemother 57:1153–1160. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkl141. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Walsh TJ, Foulds G, Pizzo PA. 1989. Pharmacokinetics and tissue penetration of fluconazole in rabbits. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 33:467–469. doi: 10.1128/AAC.33.4.467. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Weiler S, Fiegl D, MacFarland R, Stienecke E, Bellmann-Weiler R, Dunzendorfer S, Joannidis M, Bellmann R. 2011. Human tissue distribution of voriconazole. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 55:925–928. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00949-10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
