Skip to main content
Journal of Enzyme Inhibition and Medicinal Chemistry logoLink to Journal of Enzyme Inhibition and Medicinal Chemistry
. 2021 Jun 21;36(1):1007–1015. doi: 10.1080/14756366.2021.1915301

Identification of a novel SPT inhibitor WXP-003 by docking-based virtual screening and investigation of its anti-fungi effect

Xin Wang a,*, Xin Yang a,*, Xin Sun a, Yi Qian a, Mengyao Fan a, Zhehao Zhang a, Kaiyuan Deng a, Zaixiang Lou b, Zejun Pei a,, Jingyu Zhu c,
PMCID: PMC8218698  PMID: 34148472

Abstract

Serine palmitoyltransferase (SPT) plays the key role on catalysing the formation of 3-ketodihydrosphingosine, which is the first step of the de novo biosynthesis of sphingolipids. SPT is linked to many diseases including fungal infection, making it a potential therapeutic target. Thus, a logical docking-based virtual screening method was used to screen selective SPT inhibitor against fungi, not human. We used myriocin-similarity database to identify compounds with good binding with fungal SPT and poor binding with homology human SPT model. Preliminary bio-assay led to the discovery of a promising inhibitor WXP-003, which displayed good inhibitory activity against diversity fungi strains with MIC ranging from 0.78 to 12.5 μg/mL. WXP-003 could significantly reduce sphingolipids content in fungi and no effect on mouse fibroblast cell line L929. Molecular dynamics simulation depicted that SPT/WXP-003 complex formed the favoured interactions. Taken together, discovery of WXP-003 provided valuable guide for the development of novel anti-fungal agents.

Keywords: Virtual screening, SPT, inhibitor, anti-fungi

1. Introduction

Fungal infection is one of main infectious diseases in clinic, including common superficial and invasive fungal infection1. In the past few decades, morbidity and mortality caused by invasive fungal infection have been increasing with the sharp growing immunocompromised individuals, such as patients after organ transplant, patients in ICU (morbidity up to 29%, mortality up to 49%)2,3. Due to the increasing life-threatening caused by fungal infection, the effective treatments for fungal disease are needed. However, the approved antifungal agents are quite limited, mainly containing polyenes (e.g. amphotericin B and its derivatives), azoles (e.g. fluconazole, ketoconazole), echinocandins (e.g. micafungin) and 5-fluorocytosine4. With the extensive use of conventional antifungal agents, the emerging azole-resistant fungi make the problem more intractable5–7. Moreover, the current antifungal agents always show low efficacy on killing fungal cells and high toxicity because of the similarities between fungi and mammals. Therefore, developing novel antifungal agents against new targets is urgent need to improve the efficacy in killing fungi and decrease the side effects8.

Viewed as important structural components of cellular membranes, sphingolipids are a large class of lipids which implicate a wide range of cellular functions in eukaryotic and prokaryotic organisms9–12. Except that, sphingolipids play other multiple roles in fungal cells specifically, such as heat stress response, signal transduction, endocytosis, apoptosis and many others. In particular, it is also one of causes of fungal pathogenesis13–15. Thus, highly concerning on the biology of sphingolipids would be helpful for searching new targets against fungal infection. De novo sphingolipids biosynthesis is a complicated process mediated by a large number of enzymes16. Serine palmitoyltransferase (SPT) is a heterodimeric membrane protein, that could catalyse the formation of 3-ketodihydrosphingosine (3-KDS) from serine and palmitoyl CoA through condensation reaction17. SPT is the initial and rate-limiting enzyme in the de novo biosynthesis of sphingolipids, directly affecting the synthesis of two main groups of sphingolipids in fungal cells, such as inositol phosphoryl ceramide (IPC) and glucosylceramide (GlcCer)11,18–20. Some studies have shown that inhibiting the enzymes involved in the biosynthetic pathways of sphingolipids could decrease the virulence of fungal pathogens21. Especially, SPT inhibitors have been reported that could inhibit the sphingolipid formation effectively, resulting in changes of fungal membranes and cell morphology. Therefore, SPT could be an attractive target against fungal infection13.

SPT inhibitors have been reported include myriocin and some synthesised compounds 1–12 (Figure 1), and one of the most studied on anti-fungi SPT inhibitor is myriocin with good inhibitory efficacy against yeast and mould in planktonic and effecting formation of biofilm. However, SPT is also existed in host cell, leading toxicity to mammalian after administration. As well as, there are few reports on selective SPT inhibitor to date22,23. Thus, it is highly desirable to find SPT inhibitor specifically targeting fungi, rather than mammalian.

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

The structures of reported SPT inhibitors.

Since there is no 3D structure of human SPT-inhibitor complex reported at present, we finished homology human SPT model based on fungi SPT and assessed the quality of the homology SPT model through the Ramachandran plot generated by SAVES server. In effort to discover selective SPT inhibitor against fungi, we performed docking-based virtual screening (VS). Based on myriocin is a well-known SPT inhibitor, we hypothesised myriocin-analogues might have higher chances on good binding with SPT24. At the beginning, myriocin-similarity database was applied to molecular docking with fungi SPT and human SPT in turn. Based on further biological evaluation, we discovered a potent and novel SPT inhibitor with good inhibitory activity against diversity fungi. This study provided a valuable lead for development of higher potent and lower toxic SPT inhibitor. The screening procedure is summarised in Figure 2.

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

The workflow of this study.

2. Materials and methods

2.1. Homology modelling

The protein sequence of human SPT (UniProtKB: O15269) was retrieved from the NCBI database (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/protein/). BLAST search(BLASTP) (https://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Blast.cgi) was employed to search the template proteins for building human SPT, the search database was set to protein data bank (PDB), and the other parameters used defaults. After sequences search, four proteins structures were chosen, namely, 2X8U (PDB ID)25, 2JG226, 3A2B27 and 4BMK11, for the following homology modelling (HM). First, the Align Sequence to Templates module of Discovery Studio 3.5 (DS3.5) was employed to align the human SPT sequence and the template protein sequences. Second, the Build Homology Models module in DS3.5 was used to construct the target protein with the above sequence alignment, and the parameters were set as default. The top-scored model was chosen and then submitted to verify using the SAVES v5.0 server (https://servicesn.mbi.ucla.edu/SAVES/).

2.2. Similarity search

The 3D structure of myriocin was retrieved from the Pubchem database (PubChem CID: 6438394, https://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/). The Specs and Chemdiv databases were prepared by the Prepare Ligands protocol in DS3.5. And then, the Find Similar Molecules by Fingerprints module was employed with the Tanimoto coefficient28, myriocin was used as a search query molecule, and 10 fingerprint methods were used, including three FCFPs (FCFP_2, FCFP_4, and FCFP_6), three ECFPs (ECFP_2, ECFP_4 and ECFP_6), three FCFCs (FCFC_2, FCFC_4, FCFC_6), and one MDL Public Keys.

2.3. Virtual screening (VS)

Preparation of protein: The crystallographic structure of SPT (PDB ID: 4BMK, Sphingomonas paucimobilis) was used as the initial receptor of subsequent molecular docking virtual screening. The protein was prepared using the Prepare Protein protocol in DS3.5, to remove all crystallographic water, add hydrogen atoms, repair broken chains, and add CHARMm force field. Afterward, a sphere binding site was generated with the co-crystallized myriocin as centroid using the define site tool in DS3.5.

Molecular docking: The CDOCKER protocol in DS3.5 was used to perform the VS. First, the prepared 4BMK was submitted to screen the similarity molecules, the top hits were set to 5 and the other parameters were set as default. Afterward, the top-scored pose of each similarity molecule was retained, and all selected docking poses were submitted to VS with the modelling-human SPT protein.

2.4. Chemistry

The synthesis of compound WXP-001: l-Serine (1, 2.0 g, 19.0 mmol) was dissolved in 80 ml of toluene, and dodecanol (2, 3.5 g, 19.0 mmol), p-toluenesulfonic acid monohydrate (3.6 g, 19.0 mmol) in turn were added to above solution at room temperature. Then the oil–water separator was connected and heated to 110 °C under reflux overnight. The reaction was monitored by TLC. The reaction solution was cooled to room temperature and diluted with ethyl acetate. Then the organic phase was washed with saturated sodium bicarbonate and brine successively and dried with anhydrous sodium sulphate. After filtered, the filtrate was concentrated in vacuo through a silica gel column (PE:EA = 1:1–1:3∼DCM:MeOH = 20:1) to obtain 2.5 g of brown oil l-serine lauryl ester. The resultant brown oil (800 mg) was dissolved in 5 ml mixture solution containing hydrogen chloride and methanol, stirring at room temperature for 15 min, and concentrated under vacuum to obtain the product l-serine dodecyl ester hydrochloride (compound WXP-001, 410.0 mg, 31%), light brown particles. LC-MS(ESI): 274.4 (M + H)+, RT = 4.75 min; 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 8.43 (s, 2H), 5.59 (s, 1H), 4.19–4.11 (m, 3H), 3.86–3.77 (m, 2H), 1.64–1.57 (m, 2H), 1.32–1.25 (m, 18H), 0.88–0.84 (m, 3H).

The synthesis of compound WXP-002: l-Leucine (3, 1.31 g, 0.01 mol) was dissolved in toluene (20 ml), then added octadecan-1-ol (4, 2.70 g, 0.01 mol) and p-toluenesulfonic acid (2.09 g, 0.01 mol) to above solution. Use the method of synthesis of WXP-001. Purified through silica gel chromatography (PE:EA = 2:1) to give yellow oily leucine octadecy ester (compound WXP-002, 2.21 g, 57%). LC-MS(ESI): 384.5 (M + H)+, RT = 6.68 min; 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 8.48 (s, 2H), 4.20–4.09 (m, 2H), 3.97–3.93 (m, 1H), 1.76–1.72 (m, 1H), 1.64–1.58 (m, 4H), 1.29–1.23 (m, 30H), 0.91–0.89 (m, 6H), 0.87–0.83 (m, 3H).

The synthesis of compound WXP-003: l-Leucine (3, 1.31 g, 0.01 mol) was dissolved in toluene (20 ml), then added dodecanol (2, 1.68 g, 0.01 mol) and p-toluenesulfonic acid (2.09 g, 0.01 mol) to above solution. Use the method of synthesis of WXP-001. Purified through silica gel chromatography (PE:EA = 2:1) to give yellow oily leucine dodecyl ester (1.0 g, 33%). LC-MS(ESI): 300.3 (M + H)+, RT = 2.94 min; 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 4.12 (t, 2H), 3.46 (m, 1H), 1.83 (m, 2H), 1.77–1.75 (m, 1H), 1.74–1.72 (m, 2H), 1.45–1.20 (m, 18H), 0.95–0.83 (m, 9H).

2.5. MIC determination via broth microdilution assay

MIC determinations were finished via broth microdilution assay with myriocin and caspofungin used as positive inhibitor controls. All experimental fungus were provided by the Pathogenic Microorganism (toxin) Preservation Center of Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, including four species of fungi and two drug-sensitive reference strains as follows: Aspergillus fumigates (CMCCC(F) A.1a), Cryptococcus neoformans (CMCCC(F) D.2a), Sporothrix (CMCCC(F) D.1a), Rhizopus oryzae (CMCCC(F) B.81a), Candida parapsilosis (ATCC22019) and Candida krusei (ATCC6258). Myriocin was prepared to 2 mg/mL solution in methanol and caspofungin was prepared to 5 mg/mL solution in water. Compounds WXP-001∼003 were dissolved in dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) to prepare stock solutions of 10 mg/mL concentration.

The compounds along with positive controls were serially diluted to 10 concentrations solution across the 96-well plates, ranging from 100 µg/mL to 0.195 µg/mL with final volumes of 100 µL per well. Yeasts were cultured in Sabouraud Dextrose Agar (SDA) at 30 °C for 48 h. Filamentous fungus were cultured in Potato Dextrose Agar (PDA) at 26 °C for 7–10 d. Each sample was then diluted to suspension with sterile saline solution and was calculated the density. The resultant suspensions were diluted and added to above compound-containing 96-well plates (100 µL per well) to give the yeasts density of 0.5–2.5 × 103 cfµ/mL and filamentous fungus density of 0.4–5 × 104 cfµ/mL. All the plates were incubated at 37 °C. The OD value of each well was recorded, the blank subtracted out, and the growth in each well calculated as percentage of the control. The lowest concentration of compound that resulted in <10% growth was recorded as the MIC.

2.6. Sphingolipids content assay

Cells in the logarithmic phase were removed to a centrifuge tube and sonicated for 30 min in an ice bath. Fungi were also treated under same conditions. Collected 1.0 ml of supernatant by centrifugation, then added 2.0 mL of extraction mixture (isopropanol: ultrapure water: ethyl acetate = 30:10:60). The mixture was extracted for 2 h at 180 rpm and separated by standing or centrifugation, and the supernatant was taken as the test sample. Diluted the standard and determined the standard curve. Set blank well and sample well, added 40 µL of sample diluent to the 96-well plates, and added 10 µL of sample to be tested (the final dilution concentration of the sample is 5 times). After sealed with the sealing film, the plates were incubated at 37 °C for 30 min. Diluted the 30-fold concentrated solution with distilled water 30-fold before use. Then each well was washed with washing liquid for 5 times, each time for 30 s. Except for blank wells, sample wells were added 50 µL of enzyme-labelled reagent. Repeated the incubation operation and washed. Each well was added a colour developer and mixed gently, then incubated at 37 °C for 10 min in the dark. After incubation, added 50 µL stop solution to stop the reaction. OD value was measured at 450 nm.

2.7. Molecular dynamics (MD) simulation

The SPT/WXP-003 complex, with the best bioactivity, generated by molecular docking was used as initial structures to carry out MD simulation by Desmond software package29. First, the whole system was immersed in a solvent orthorhombic model with explicit SPC (Single Point Charge) water molecules and the boundary of the infiltration volume was extended to 10 Å in each direction, and then the system was neutralised with Na+/Cl counter ions. Further, the solvated system was minimised under the OPLS_2005 force field. Afterward, the complex was submitted to a 60-ns MD simulation following the default NPT and NVT ensemble protocols in Desmond program. During the production run, the temperature and the pressure were set to 300.0 K and 1.01325 bar, respectively. The energy and atomic coordinate trajectory recording interval were set to 20 ps. After MD simulation, The RMSD and protein-ligand contacts were calculated with the Simulation Interaction Diagram protocol in Desmond package30.

3. Results and discussion

3.1. In silico screening

The procedure of in silico screening employed in this study involves two stages of establishment of homology modelling and docking-based virtual screening.

Initially, the input human SPT sequences were searched to find homologous protein structures using BLAST, and this resulted four proteins as matching proteins in the PDB, structure ID 2X8U (a crystal structure of Sphingomonas wittichii), 2JG2 (a crystal structure of Sphingomonas paucimobilis), 3A2B (a crystal structure of Sphingobacterium multivorum) and 4BMK (a crystal structure of Sphingomonas paucimobilis). As is well known, the sequence alignment plays a key role in homology modelling method. From the BLASTP results, the human SPT exhibited a good alignment with the selected template proteins. The sequence identities were 29.41% for 2X8U, 28.44% for 2JG2, 32.33% for 3A2B, and 28.44% for 4BMK, and the alignments of structures and sequences showed in Figure 3. The quality of the homology SPT model was assessed through the Ramachandran plot generated by SAVES server. As shown in Figure 4, 90.2% amino acids were in most favoured regions, 7.4% amino acids were in additional allowed regions and only 0.8% were in disallowed regions. These results indicated that the building human SPT model was satisfactory and reliable for the following VS.

Figure 3.

Figure 3.

(A) The alignment of SPT sequences. (B) Alignment of homology SPT model (orange) and fungi SPT (green, PDB ID: 4BMK).

Figure 4.

Figure 4.

Ramachandran plot of homology SPT model.

The procedure of virtual screening is shown in Figure 5. Since myriocin is a well-known SPT inhibitor, myriocin-analogues may have higher chances on good binding with SPT. Based on 3D structure of myriocin, the Specs and Chemdiv databases were systematic fingerprint to establish myriocin-similarity database. Then, the crystallographic structure of fungal SPT with myriocin (PDB ID: 4BMK) was employed to screen against the myriocin-similarity database. About 120 top-scored compounds were retained, and then were submitted to the homology human SPT model. Finally, 82 compounds with weak binding affinity to human SPT were selected for the further bio-assay.

Figure 5.

Figure 5.

The procedure of virtual screening.

3.2. Anti-fungal activity evaluation and chemistry

The 82 compounds screened in silico were evaluated through preliminary bio-assay. Five standard fungal strains (C. tropicalis 186815, C. parapsilosis 336515, C. glabrata 337348, C. krusei 185429 and C. lusitaniae 340928) and three clinical drug-resistance fungal strains (C. tropicalis 191529, C. tropicalis 191327 and C. parapsilosis 191344) were used as tested fungi. These compounds were initially screened to inhibit fungi growing at the concentration of 100 µM, 50 µM and 10 µM. Only 5 compounds displayed promising anti-fungal growing activity against diversity fungi at tested concentration (Supplementary Table S1). WXP-004∼005 only showed low activity against some kinds of fungi. Especially, compounds WXP-001∼003 showed significant anti-fungal activity against the tested fungi, the structures as shown in Figure 6. WXP-001∼002 inhibited all the kinds of tested fungi growing at the concentration of 50 µM, while WXP-003 revealed the brilliant inhibitory activity against all the tested fungal strains at 10 µM (Supplementary Table S1). Therefore, WXP-001∼003 were selected to further evaluated on more kinds of fungi to detect the MIC value in detail.

Figure 6.

Figure 6.

The structures of WXP-001∼003.

Based on above preliminary screening on anti-fungal activity, we first synthesised the three potential compounds to make sure enough amounts of compounds for the further evaluation. As shown in Scheme 1, compound WXP-001 was synthesised through ester condensation reaction with l-serine and dodecanol as the start materials. Compounds WXP-002∼003 were employed the same method of WXP-001. Notably, all the products were needed to be stirred in mixture solution of hydrogen chloride and methanol to produce hydrochloride product. All the steps obtained moderate yields.

Scheme 1.

Scheme 1.

The synthesis of compound WXP-0 0 1–003. a(Reagents and conditions: (A) TsOH, toluene,110 °C, o/n, 31%∼ 57%yield).

Here, compounds WXP-001∼003 exhibited fungicidal activity against six fungal strains evaluated in the test of the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) with myriocin and caspofungin used as control, these fungi including A. fumigatus, R. oryzae, cryptococcus, sporothrix, C. krusei and C. parapsilosis (Table 1). Compound WXP-001 only displayed more outstanding inhibitory activity (MIC = 3.125 μg/mL) against C. krusei than caspofungin (MIC = 25 μg/mL), low inhibitory activity against A. fumigatus, R. oryzae and sporothrix. Compound WXP-002 exhibited moderate activity against all the tested fungi strains with MIC value ranging between 10 and 100 μg/mL, but obviously lower than positive control. Significantly, WXP-003 showed the highest inhibitory activity against all the tested fungal strains during these three compounds. Anti-fungal activity of WXP-003 against C. krusei and R oryzae was superior with MIC value at 0.78 μg/mL and 12.5 μg/mL, while caspofungin only showed MIC value at 25 μg/mL and 100 μg/mL. Similarly, compound WXP-003 exhibited better activity against A. fumigatus and cryptococcus (MIC = 3.125 μg/mL, 3.125 μg/mL) than SPT inhibitor myriocin (MIC = 6.25 μg/mL, 6.25 μg/mL).

Table 1.

Anti-fungal activity of compounds WXP-001∼003.

  MIC (μg/mL)
Compounds A. fumigatus R. oryzae Cryptococcus Sporothrix Candida
krusei
Candida
parapsilosis
WXP-001 50 >100 12.5 100 3.125 12.5
WXP-002 25 50 25 50 12.5 100
WXP-003 3.125 12.5 3.125 3.125 0.78 1.56
Myriocin 6.25 6.25 6.25 1.56 0.195 0.195
Caspofungin 0.195 100 0.195 0.39 25 1.56

MIC: minimum inhibitory concentration.

Thus, compound WXP-003 was selected to test the effect on sphingolipids content in fungi and mouse fibroblast cell line L929, myriocin as positive control and vehicle as negative control (Table 2). The results showed that WXP-003 and myriocin could reduce the sphingolipids content obviously in Fusarium graminearum and C. albicans, and the sphingolipids contents treated with WXP-003 were 454.23 ng/L and 572.97 ng/L, respectively, in F. graminearum and C. albicans, while vehicle were 553.28 ng/L and 624.40 ng/L, respectively. WXP-003 had almost no effect on the sphingolipids content in mouse fibroblast cells at the concentration of 1.0 mg/L (sphingolipids content: 832.92 ng/L of WXP-003 and 847.17 ng/L of vehicle). WXP-003 could significantly reduce sphingolipids content in fungi and no effect on mammal cells.

Table 2.

Sphingolipids content in two fungal strains and mouse cell line L929 treated with compounds WXP-003 and myriocin.

  Sphingolipids content (ng/L)
Compounds Fusarium graminearuma Candida albicansa L929b
WXP-003 454.23 572.97 832.92
Myriocin 428.16 563.34 815.71
Vehicle 553.28 624.40 847.17

aThe concentration of compounds at 1/2 MIC.

bThe concentration of compounds at 1.0 mg/L.

In short, WXP-003 presented the potent anti-fungal activity in this study and then we further explored the molecular dynamics simulation of WXP-003 with fungi SPT to help us understand the binding mode of WXP-003 and fungi SPT.

3.3. Molecular dynamics simulation

To further investigate the dynamic interaction patterns of SPT/WXP-003 complex, MD simulation was conducted. First, the stability of the system was evaluated and monitored through the RMSD (root-mean-square deviation) of the backbone atoms. As shown in Supplementary Figure S1, during the last 30 ns, the RMSD values were considerably stable, suggesting that the MD simulation reached equilibrium within the last 30 ns.

To investigate the binding mechanism of SPT/WXP-003, the per-residue contributions in ligand binding were calculated. Figure 7(A) shows that WXP-003 could well adapt to the binding pocket of SPT, which was similar to the myriocin/SPT complex11. WXP-003 covalent bond to the PLP (pyridoxal 5′-phosphate), and the SPT/WXP-003 complex also formed the favoured interactions with the key residues within the active site, such as Gly134, His159, Lys265 (Figure 7(B,D))11,27. As shown in Figure 7(C), the carbonyl of WXP-003 formed a strong hydrogen bond interaction with Tyr73, which may play a key role in the potent bioactivity of WXP-003. The key residues–inhibitor interactions are shown in Figure 7(D), in addition to the key contribution discussed above, WXP-003 could form the strong Van der Waals interaction with SPT, especially Tyr135, Leu139, that could make the carbon tail of WXP-003 more stable in this PLP-SPT system.

Figure 7.

Figure 7.

(A) The compound WXP-003 well adapted into the SPT protein. (B) The key residues of the active site of SPT/WXP-003system. (C) 2D presentation of interaction between WXP-003 and SPT. (D) The WXP-003-PLP/residue interaction spectrum of the SPT binding site.

3.4. Prediction of physio-chemical properties of WXP-003

The correlation between physio-chemical properties of the chemical moieties and the drug pharmacokinetics in the human body was calculated by the Lipinski rule of five. Despite some exception in drug discovery, it is a widely accepted method for preliminary screening of drugs. The results deduced from the molinspiration server are summarised in Table 3. The data disclosed that the molecular weight of WXP-003 was below 500 and the log P values lie in the accepted limits. WXP-003 had shown 3 hydrogen bond acceptors and 2 hydrogen bond donors.

Table 3.

Predicted properties of compound WXP-003.

Lipinski’s para  
 Lop P 6.17
 MW 299.50
 HDA 3
 HDB 2
Bioactivity score  
TPSA 52.33
Molar volume 336.85
GPCR ligand 0.18
Ion channel modulator 0.23
Kinase inhibitor −0.15
Nuclear receptor ligand −0.07
Protease inhibitor 0.40
Enzyme inhibitor 0.27

Calculated from online server http://www.molinspiration.com/cgi-bin/properties. HDA: number of hydrogen bond acceptors; HBD: number of hydrogen bond donors; MW: molecular weight; LogP: logarithm of partition coefficient between n-octanol and water (miLogP); TPSA: topological polar surface area. A molecule having bioactivity score more than 0.00 is likely to exhibit considerable biological activity, while value −0.50 to 0.00 are expected to be moderately active and if the score is less than −0.50 it is presumed to be inactive.

4. Conclusion

In summary, we have constructed homology models of human serine palmitoyltransferase (SPT) for virtual screening. A logical docking-based virtual screening approach was employed to identify novel fungi SPT inhibitors while except human SPT inhibitors. In our study, WXP-003 was screened through in silico and in MIC assays and was synthesised. WXP-003 showed strong inhibitory activity against the tested fungal strains. WXP-003 could significantly reduce sphingolipids content in fungi and no effect on mouse fibroblast cell L929. Meanwhile, molecular dynamics simulation was conducted to investigate the dynamic interaction patterns of SPT/WXP-003 complex, and then the SPT/WXP-003 complex formed the favoured interactions with the key residues within the active site. The prediction of physio-chemical properties provided further evidence that WXP-003 may be a promising anti-fungal agent. This work offers a new potential approach based on discovering selective fungi SPT inhibitor.

Supplementary Material

Supplemental Material

Funding Statement

This work was supported by the Primary Research and Development Plan Programs of Jiangsu Province [Grant no. 2019633]; the Science, Education and Health Engineering-Medical Innovation Team Project of Wu’xi [Grant no. CXTD007]; the National Natural Science Foundation of China [Grant no. 21807049]; the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [Grant no. JUSRP51703A]; Science and Technology Development Fund Project of Nanjing Medical University [Grant no. NMUB2020277 and NMUB2020275]; Translational Medicine Research Project for Translational Medicine Center of Wu'xi [Grant no. 2020ZHYB11].

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).

References

  • 1.Brown GD, Denning DW, Gow NAR, et al. Hidden killers: human fungal infections. Sci Transl Med 2012;4:165rv13. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Almeida F, Rodrigues ML, Coelho C.. The still underestimated problem of fungal diseases worldwide. Front Microbiol 2019;10:214. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Lionakis MS. Primary immunodeficiencies and invasive fungal infection: when to suspect and how to diagnose and manage. Curr Opin Infect Dis 2019;32:531–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Liu W, Yuan L, Wang S.. Recent progress in the discovery of antifungal agents targeting the cell wall. J Med Chem 2020;63:12429–59. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Thamban Chandrika N, Shrestha SK, Ngo HX, et al. Alkylated piperazines and piperazine-azole hybrids as antifungal agents. J Med Chem 2018;61:158–73. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Perfect JR. The antifungal pipeline: a reality check. Nat Rev Drug Discov 2017;16:603–16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Hamill RJ. Amphotericin b formulations: a comparative review of efficacy and toxicity. Drugs 2013;73:919–34. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.d’Enfert C. Hidden killers: persistence of opportunistic fungal pathogens in the human host. Curr Opin Microbiol 2009;12:358–64. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Dickson RC, Sumanasekera C, Lester RL.. Functions and metabolism of sphingolipids in saccharomyces cerevisiae. Prog Lipid Res 2006;45:447–65. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Cowart LA, Obeid LM. Yeast sphingolipids: recent developments in understanding biosynthesis, regulation, and function. Biochim Biophys Acta 2007;1771:421–31. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Wadsworth JM, Clarke DJ, McMahon SA, et al. The chemical basis of serine palmitoyltransferase inhibition by myriocin. J Am Chem Soc 2013;135:14276–85. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Fernandes CM, Goldman GH, Del Poeta M.. Biological roles played by sphingolipids in dimorphic and filamentous fungi. mBio 2018;9:e00642-00618. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Rollin-Pinheiro R, Singh A, Barreto-Bergter E, Del Poeta M.. Sphingolipids as targets for treatment of fungal infections. Future Med Chem 2016;8:1469–84. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Poeta R. Sphingolipid signaling in fungal pathogens. Adv Exp Med Biol 2010;688:232–7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Singh A, MacKenzie A, Girnun G, Del Poeta M.. Analysis of sphingolipids, sterols, and phospholipids in human pathogenic cryptococcus strains. J Lipid Res 2017;58:2017–36. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Harrison PJ, Dunn TM, Campopiano DJ.. Sphingolipid biosynthesis in man and microbes. Nat Prod Rep 2018;35:921–54. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Acharya U, Acharya JK.. Enzymes of sphingolipid metabolism in drosophila melanogaster. Cell Mol Life Sci 2005;62:128–42. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Harrison PJ, Gable K, Somashekarappa N, et al. Use of isotopically labeled substrates reveals kinetic differences between human and bacterial serine palmitoyltransferase. J Lipid Res 2019;60:953–62. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Yoshihiro Takahashi TB, Kanzaki H, Matsumura H, et al. Serine palmitoyltransferase, the first step enzyme in sphingolipid biosynthesis, is involved in nonhost resistance. Mol Plant Microbe Interact 2009;22:31–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Takahashi HK, Toledo MS, Suzuki E, et al. Current relevance of fungal and trypanosomatid glycolipids and sphingolipids: studies defining structures conspicuously absent in mammals. An Acad Bras Cienc 2009;81:477–88. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Mor V, Rella A, Farnoud AM, et al. Identification of a new class of antifungals targeting the synthesis of fungal sphingolipids. mBio 2015;6:e00647. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Kojima T, Asano Y, Kurasawa O, et al. Discovery of novel serine palmitoyltransferase inhibitors as cancer therapeutic agents. Bioorg Med Chem 2018;26:2452–65. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Yaguchi M, Shibata S, Satomi Y, et al. Antitumor activity of a novel and orally available inhibitor of serine palmitoyltransferase. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2017;484:493–500. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Genin MJ, Gonzalez Valcarcel IC, Holloway WG, et al. Imidazopyridine and pyrazolopiperidine derivatives as novel inhibitors of serine palmitoyl transferase. J Med Chem 2016;59:5904–10. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Raman MC, Johnson KA, Clarke DJ, et al. The serine palmitoyltransferase from Sphingomonas wittichii rw1: an interesting link to an unusual acyl carrier protein. Biopolymers 2010;93:811–22. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Yard BA, Carter LG, Johnson KA, et al. The structure of serine palmitoyltransferase; gateway to sphingolipid biosynthesis. J Mol Biol 2007;370:870–86. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Ikushiro H, Islam MM, Okamoto A, et al. Structural insights into the enzymatic mechanism of serine palmitoyltransferase from Sphingobacterium multivorum. J Biochem 2009;146:549–62. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Butina D. Unsupervised data base clustering based on daylight’s fingerprint and tanimoto similarity: a fast and automated way to cluster small and large data sets. J Chem Inf Comput Sci 1999;39:747–50. [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Shaw DE. A fast, scalable method for the parallel evaluation of distance-limited pairwise particle interactions. J Comput Chem 2005;26:1318–28. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Chow E, Klepeis J, Rendleman C, et al. New technologies for molecular dynamics simulations. In: Egelman EH, ed. Comprehensive biophysics. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 2012:86–104. [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplemental Material

Articles from Journal of Enzyme Inhibition and Medicinal Chemistry are provided here courtesy of Taylor & Francis

RESOURCES