Abstract
Background
Chronic suppurative otitis media (CSOM) is a chronic infection of the middle ear with perforation of the tympanic membrane and secrete from the ear more for than two months, either continuously or intermittently. Chronic suppurative otitis media has a high prevalence and impact on the physical, social, and psychological of the patients. This disease may be fatal and even cause death.
Objective
Analyzing management evaluation of CSOM patients.
Methods
A retrospective study was conducted based on medical records of CSOM patients from January 2017–December 2019. The study used total sampling Chi-squared test with p < 0.05.
Results
There were 600 patients with CSOM in January 2017–December 2019. Most of them were male, aged 36–45 years old with normal body mass index. There were 431 patients on the follow-up post-treatment by either medical or surgical management. The recovery rate could be assessed from the evaluation of CSOM complaints 6 months after treatment, and the results were significant (p < 0.001). Conclusions: CSOM managements are in the form of operative and non-operative that shows improvement within 6-month evaluation.
Keywords: Chronic suppurative otitis media (CSOM), Characteristics, Recovery rate
Highlights
-
-
Canal wall down at CSOM has repair after 6 months.
-
-
The CSOM figure in Indonesia is quite high.
-
-
CSOM patient recovery rate can be evaluated on average after treatment of >15 days.
1. Background
Chronic suppurative otitis media (CSOM) is a chronic infection of the middle ear with perforation of the tympanic membrane and secrete from the ear for more than two months, either continuously or intermittently [1]. According to WHO, the prevalence of CSOM in the world is 65–330 million people, with 60% of whom experiencing hearing loss. Meanwhile, the incidence rate is 9 cases out of 100,000 population [2]. The high incidence of CSOM is influenced by the etiology and the pathogenesis of the CSOM itself. There are several influencing factors, such as infection, anatomy or physiology dysfunction, environment, allergy, or patient's factor including immunity, gender, and others [3]. Clinically, CSOM is classified into two types, namely the tubotympanic and the atticoantral. CSOM disease begins with inflammation of the middle ear that lasts a long time and does not receive adequate management [3,4].
Symptoms of CSOM may include thick and stink discharge from the ear canal (otorrhea), decreased hearing ability, ringing in ears, ear pain, ear fullness, headache, and dizziness. Diagnosis of CSOM can be confirmed by examination using an otoscope or a microscope, hearing examination, facial nerve topography examination, bacterial culture examination, and antibiotics resistance test from the ear secretion, and also the ear and temporal bone imaging by Computed Tomography-Scan (CT-Scan) dan Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) temporal [2,4].
CSOM management includes education, aural toilets, administration of antibiotics, and surgery. The initial therapy that can be given to patients with CSOM is aural toilet. Education should always be given to the patient to keep his/her ear dry, open his/her mouth while sneezing or coughing, consult a doctor immediately if there any complaints of cough and colds. Ear canal cleaning (aural toilet) should be conducted using warm normal saline or hydrogen peroxide 3% solution. The administration of a broad-spectrum antibiotic to CSOM patients could be in form of topical and systemical (orally or intravenously) for a minimum of 5 days to 2 weeks to eliminate CSOM without complications [2,4]. Patient with treatment failure who presents with persistent otorrhea after three weeks of treatment can be additionally treated with topical antibiotics that are based on the culture in addition to the aural toilet. Oral treatment can be given if there is no selection of topical therapeutics based on the pathogen susceptibility pattern. If the patient fails topical or oral culture-based therapy, intravenous (IV) antibiotics may be administered. However, surgery is necessary if there is an infectious condition that requires evacuation or decompression to reduce infection, reconstruct, prevent, and treat infections and complications. Some researchers believe that middle ear and mastoid surgery should be performed on children who fail on maximal medical therapy including IV antibiotics, or recurrent in a relatively short time of about six to eight weeks [5]. The surgery can be performed based on the CSOM type, such as canal wall up and canal wall down, particularly on CSOM with cholesteatoma [4,6].
Evaluation of clinical conditions on the management given is carried out periodically to assess the possibility of recurrence. The evaluation should be conducted during hospitalization, one week after the procedure, within one to approximately six months, assessing the patient's complaints, ear and temporal state, and hearing function. Evaluation of the management both in the form of medical and operative measures must be carried out properly, so that patient management becomes more comprehensive. In the end, the evaluation of the management given can help reduce the morbidity and mortality rates of CSOM. This study aimed to evaluate the management that has been carried out on CSOM patients.
2. Methods
Participants in this study were CSOM patients who underwent treatment. Participant's inclusion criteria were patients diagnosed with CSOM [1,7,8]. Participant's exclusion criteria included incomplete participant medical records.
This study employed a retrospective design using data from January 2017–December 2019. The number of participants in this study was 600 participants based on total sampling method. This study reported the data based on the Strengthening the Reporting of Cohort Studies in Surgery (STROCSS) 2019 guideline [9]. The study data collection included patient's characteristics, physical examination records, supportive examination records, complications, management, and complaints within 6 months after treatment were recorded for further evaluation based on medical records. Management of CSOM and diagnosis uses guidelines adopted from WHO [1,7,8,10].
The data collected were analysed using SPSS assistance and presented based on the analysis. Univariate data were presented in the form of tables and frequency distributions. Meanwhile, bivariate analysis used the Chi-squared test with p < 0.05, where the results of the analysis were significant if p < 0.05.
3. Results
3.1. Characteristics of participants
Most participants were male as much as 53.7%. Most participants aged between 36 and 45 years as much as 28%, followed by the age group of 46–65 years as much as 23.3%. The youngest participant was 3 years old and the oldest was 82 years old. Most of the identified participants had BMI in the normal category as much as 43.2% (Table 1).
Table 1.
General characteristics.
Characteristics | n (%) |
---|---|
Gender | |
Male | 322 (53.7) |
Female | 278 (46.3) |
Age | |
<5 years | 20 (3.3) |
5–15 years | 26 (4.3) |
16–25 years | 45 (7.5) |
26–35 years | 125 (20.8) |
36–45 years | 168 (28) |
46–55 years | 140 (23.3) |
56–65 years | 48 (8) |
>65 years | 28 (4.7) |
BMI | |
Underweight | 129 (21.5) |
Normal | 259 (43.2) |
Overweight | 95 (15.8) |
Obesity class 1 | 89 (14.8) |
Obesity class 2 | 28 (4.7) |
Note: BMI, Body Mass Index.
3.2. Diagnosis
History of otorrhea was the most common symptom as much as 86.3%, followed by hearing loss of 38%. The examination on tympanic membrane showed that 37.3% were perforated >50%. Inaccessible tympanic membrane on 21.5% of patients was due to cholesteatoma or granulation tissue blockage. There were 33.9% of patients who suffered facial nerve paralysis House Brackmann IV. Moderate conductive type hearing loss was found in 40.5% of patients. Mastoid plain radiographs were examined in all patients, and a sclerotic image was obtained in 65% of patients. A mastoid CT scan was carried out to 358 patients, with temporal bone destruction being found in 35.3% of patients, followed by mass or fluid in the middle ear in 23% of patients. The most common confirmed diagnosis was complicated CSOM, with the most complication being mastoiditis (51.3%). Moreover, there were 0.2% intracranial complications in the form of cerebral abscesses (Table 2).
Table 2.
Examination's results and diagnosis.
Examination | n (%) |
---|---|
Tympanic Membrane | |
Adhesive Tympanic Membrane | 21 (3.5) |
<25% Perforated | 33 (5.5) |
25–50% Perforated | 143 (23.8) |
>50% Perforated | 224 (37.3) |
Cannot be evaluated | 129 (21.5) |
Total | 46 (7.7) |
Attic perforation | 4 (0.7) |
Facial Nerve | |
House Brackmann II | 18 (14.5) |
House Brackmann III | 33 (26.6) |
House Brackmann IV | 42 (33.9) |
House Brackmann V | 31 (25.0) |
House Brackmann VI | 0 (0.0) |
Audiogram | |
Normal | 44 (7.3) |
Conductive type hearing loss | |
Mild | 112 (18.7) |
Moderate | 243 (40.5) |
Severe | 48 (8.0) |
Sensorineural type hearing loss | |
Mild | 31 (5.2) |
Moderate | 42 (7.0) |
Severe | 13 (2.1) |
Mixed type hearing loss | |
Mild | 16 (2.7) |
Moderate | 51 (8.5) |
Mastoid CT Scan | |
Temporal bone destruction | 212 (35.3) |
Mass or fluid in the middle ear | 138 (23.0) |
Ossicles destruction | 5 (0.8) |
Cochlear abnormalities | 3 (0.5) |
Diagnosis | |
Uncomplicated CSOM | 125 (20.8) |
Complicated CSOM | 475 (79.2) |
Complications | |
Extracranial | |
Mastoiditis | 308 (51.3) |
Labyrinthitis | 1 (0.2) |
Facial nerve paralysis | 124 (20.7) |
Retro-auricular fistula | 38 (6.3) |
Subperiosteal abscess | 3 (0.5) |
Intracranial | |
Cerebral abscess | 1 (0.2) |
3.3. Treatment and prognosis
Operative management was carried out to 82.5% of patients, with canal wall up surgery being the majority. During surgery, cholesteatoma and granulation tissue were found in 7.2% of patients, cholesteatoma in 3% of patients, and pus in 1.8% of patients. The medication given after surgery was topical and systemic antibiotic, with cephalosporine being the most common drug given to the patients (69.7%). The results of patient's examination after six months of treatment showed that 426 patients (71.00%) had no complaints of any symptoms. In this study, there were no patients who died nor experienced iatrogenic complications (Table 3).
Table 3.
Treatment and prognosis of CSOM.
Treatment | n (%) |
---|---|
Management | |
Operative | 495 (82.5) |
Non-operative | 105 (17.5) |
Type of surgery | |
Myringoplasty | 4 (0.7) |
Type 2 tympanoplasty | 53 (8.8) |
Canal wall up | 206 (34.3) |
Canal wall down | 118 (19.7) |
Facial nerve decompression | 113 (18.8) |
CAE Stenosis Reconstruction | 1 (0.2) |
Post-6 month evaluation | |
No complaints | 426 (71.0) |
Otalgia | 12 (2.0) |
Otorrhea | 87 (14.5) |
Tinnitus | 27 (4.5) |
Hearing impairment | 58 (9.7) |
Crooked face | 21 (3.5) |
Balance impairment | 4 (0.7) |
Clinical Finding | |
Intact tympanic membrane | 423 (70.5) |
Ear canal stenosis | 13 (2.2) |
Tympanic membrane perforation | 73 (12.2) |
Otorrhea | 38 (6.3) |
Cholesteatoma | 6 (1.0) |
Granulation tissue | 21 (3.5) |
Retro-auricular fistula | 5 (0.8) |
Facial nerve paralysis | 21 (3.5) |
Subperiosteal abscess | 0 (0.0) |
Audiogram | |
Increased hearing level | 411 (68.5) |
Same hearing level | 159 (26.5) |
Decreased hearing level | 30 (5.0) |
The correlation between the patient's management with recovery rate could be seen in Table 4. Patient's recovery rate could be evaluated from the patient's complaints, physical examination using microscope or endoscope, and audiometry 6 months after treatment both operative and non-operative. This study found a statistically significant relationship between operative and non-operative management and patient recovery rate (p = 0.001).
Table 4.
Correlation between CSOM management with outcome after 6-month treatment.
Post 6-month evaluation | Operative n (%) | Non-Operative n (%) | p |
---|---|---|---|
No complaints | 337 (56.1) | 89 (14.8) | 0.001* |
Persistent complaints | 158 (26.3) | 16 (2.7) | |
Intact tympanic membrane | 396 (66.0) | 27 (4.5) | 0.000** |
Other disorders | 99 (16.5) | 78 (13) | |
Increased hearing level | 353 (58.8) | 58 (9.7) | 0.000** |
Same hearing level | 133 (22.2) | 26 (4.3) | |
Decreased hearing level | 9 (1.5) | 21 (3.5) |
Note: *Significance p < 0.05; **Significance p < 0.001.
4. Discussion
The ratio between male and female participants in this study was almost equal, with a greater percentage in males. This finding is consistent with a study in India which stated that the incidence ratio of CSOM in male and female was almost equal with the percentage of male 53.7% and female 46.5% [3]. Another study also stated that CSOM is more common in men than women [11].
This study was a retrospective study evaluating the success of CSOM management. Based on several studies, it was found that CSOM causes hearing impairment on a unilateral or bilateral basis depending on the involvement of the affected ear [3,11]. In addition, one of the CSOM management is tympanoplasty, which has been shown to improve the patient's hearing function by 57–97% [12]. This study aimed to evaluate whether the CSOM management performed quantitatively can be measured and improve CSOM procedures in the future. Studies similar to ours suggested that retrospective studies can be used to consider making a safe CSOM surgery procedure [13]. Some studies suggest that this retrospective study can be used to compare the results of several CSOM surgery techniques before and after surgery [12,14].
A study conducted by Metri Basavaraj in India reported that the age range of most CSOM patients was 1–20 years old (52.8%), followed by 21–60 years old (45.9%) [15]. Based on a study conducted in 2016, ages of 40–60 years have a higher incidence rate due to the high incidence of comorbid diseases such as diabetes mellitus [16]. BMI examination from research conducted in China in 2016 showed that the average BMI was 22.18 (normal), which is consistent with the results of this study [17].
The number of participants in this study is similar to that of Indorewala et al., which is 789 CSOM patients [12]. In addition, a study conducted by Hunt et al. had a total of 281 pediatric CSOM patients [3]. Avnstop et al. used participants as many as 223 pediatric patients with CSOM [18]. The majority of patients in this study complained of otorrhea symptoms. The complaint is in accordance with the definition of CSOM, namely a recurrent or persistent otorrhea for 2–6 weeks through a perforation in the tympanic membrane [19]. A study in the UK in 2015, which was followed by 51 patients, also reported otorrhea as a main complaint (58,8%) [2]. Apart from otorrhea, the second most common symptom was hearing loss, which is consistent with an Australian study that found 60% of patients with CSOM experienced hearing loss. This occurs due to the reduced difference in sound pressure that transmits vibrations to the middle ear due to the perforation [19,20].
From the results of the examination, the majority of patients did not show any symptoms of complications (85.8%). This is consistent with the WHO report in South Korea that there were only 10.4% of patients with complicated CSOM. A retrospective study in Thailand for 8 years found that intracranial complications only occur in 0.24% of patients. The results are consistent with this study that shows intracranial complications in only 0.24% of patients. In the same study, one of the most reported extracranial complications was facial nerve paralysis (27.9%). These results resemble the findings which obtained facial nerve paralysis as the second-most complications [8]. These results are also supported by research in 2012, which stated that the incidence of facial nerve paralysis had decreased to 0.16–5.1% since the administration of antibiotics. Facial nerve paralysis in CSOM patients with cholesteatoma can be caused by one of these four factors, such as facial nerve compression, edema and hyperemic on a certain segment, fibrosis segment, and disconnected segments. Some experts stated that paralysis on cholesteatoma patients may be caused by the cholesteatoma itself through neurotoxic substances that are secreted and cause bone damage through enzymatic reactions [21]. In this case, the most common complication was retroauricular fistula, which was formed as a result of the opening of the insulating bone and the thinness of the overlying skin [22].
Administration of broad-spectrum antibiotics for a minimum of 5 days to 2 weeks may eradicate uncomplicated CSOM. However, in some cases, it may take more time for the ears to dry, so a follow-up of at least 1 month after treatment is recommended to assess the likelihood of recurrence [23]. At the 1-month postoperative examination, 71.8% of patients had no complaints. This finding is consistent with a study conducted in Pakistan in 2011, which stated that as many as 143 out of 160 patients (89.4%) who attended the study had a good status due to the development of the antibiotic administration protocol and the management they were given [24].
Post-treatment monitoring is important to assess the therapy success in the patient, and periodic evaluation should also be carried out to assess recurrence. Evaluation is carried out during hospitalization, one week after the procedure, within one month to approximately six months, assessing the patient's complaints, ear and temporal condition, and hearing function. In a 2017 study in India that assessed the final success rate after CSOM treatment, 2 years of dry ears was found in 100% of cases. The optimal final success rate obtained was dry ears for 2 years without re-operation and retraction/perforation in 100% of cases [25].
The operative and medical management given in accordance with proper diagnosis will result in good management. In this study, the management conformed with the needs of patients according to his/her diagnosis. This study found a correlation between CSOM management with the successful treatment of the patient (p < 0.05). This finding is consistent with an Israeli study in 2020, which stated a significant relationship between the management or operative and non-operative with reduced patient complaints of otorrhea in CSOM [26]. Based on previous research, CSOM improvement can begin to be evaluated >14 days, which supports the results of our study [27,28]. Patients who underwent canal wall down surgery on CSOM with cholesteatoma with or without oblitersion require longer observation to see the healing cavity. Several studies have stated that complete healing can be seen starting in 3 months and post-surgery CSOM evaluation can be carried out in 1–6 months [29,30].
5. Conclusion
In this study, most CSOM cases occur in the age range of 36–45 years. The most frequent complaint is otorrhea, with most complications being in the form of mastoiditis. Management of CSOM is in the form of operative and non-operative measures. The recovery rate can be assessed from the evaluation of CSOM complaints and physical examination, with increased hearing level 6 months after treatment.
Declaration of competing interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Acknowledgement
We would like to thank Fis Citra Ariyanto for assisting in editing our manuscript.
Footnotes
Supplementary data to this article can be found online at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amsu.2021.102492.
Funding
None.
Ethical approval
We have conducted an ethical approval base on Declaration of Helsinki at Ethical Committee in Dr. Hasan Sadikin General Hospital, Bandung, Indonesia.
Consent
Written informed consent was obtained from the patient.
Author's contributor
All authors contributed toward data analysis, drafting and revising the paper, gave final approval of the version to be published and agree to be accountable for all aspects of the work.
Registration of research studies
-
1.
Name of the registry: -
-
2.
Unique Identifying number or registration ID: -
-
3.
Hyperlink to your specific registration (must be publicly accessible and will be checked): -
Guarantor
Sally Mahdiani is the person in charge for the publication of our manuscript.
Provenance and peer review
Not commissioned, externally peer-reviewed.
Appendix A. Supplementary data
The following is the Supplementary data to this article:
References
- 1.Artono, Surarto B., Purnami N., Hutahaen F., Mahardhika M.R. The association of IL-1 alpha level and TNF alpha expressions on bone destruction in chronic suppurative otitis media and cholesteatoma. Indian J. Otolaryngol. : official publication of the Association of Otolaryngologists of India. 2020;72(1):1–7. doi: 10.1007/s12070-019-01704-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Morris P. Chronic suppurative otitis media. Clin. Evid. 2012;2012 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Hunt L., Mulwafu W., Knott V., Ndamala C.B., Naunje A.W., Dewhurst S., Hall A., Mortimer K. Prevalence of paediatric chronic suppurative otitis media and hearing impairment in rural Malawi: a cross-sectional survey. PloS One. 2017;12(12) doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0188950. e0188950-e0188950. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Mittal R., Lisi C.V., Gerring R., Mittal J., Mathee K., Narasimhan G., Azad R.K., Yao Q., Grati Mh, Yan D., Eshraghi A.A., Angeli S.I., Telischi F.F., Liu X.-Z. Current concepts in the pathogenesis and treatment of chronic suppurative otitis media. J. Med. Microbiol. 2015;64(10):1103–1116. doi: 10.1099/jmm.0.000155. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Yazdi M.M.K., Ghalavand Z., Yazdi A.K., Kodori M., Taheri M., Tabriz M.S., Eslami G. Chronic suppurative otitis media: a case report. Infect. Disord. - Drug Targets. 2020;20(2):244–246. doi: 10.2174/1871526519666190228162001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Bareeqa S.B., Ahmed S.I. Comment to empirical therapy for chronic suppurative otitis media. Clin. Med. Insights Ear, Nose Throat. 2018;11 doi: 10.1177/1179550618810226. 1179550618810226-1179550618810226. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Anggraeni R., Hartanto W.W., Djelantik B., Ghanie A., Utama D.S., Setiawan E.P., Lukman E., Hardiningsih C., Asmuni S., Budiarti R., Rahardjo S.P., Djamin R., Mulyani T., Mutyara K., Carosone-Link P., Kartasasmita C.B., Simões E.A. Otitis media in Indonesian urban and rural school children. Pediatr. Infect. Dis. J. 2014;33(10):1010–1015. doi: 10.1097/inf.0000000000000366. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Anggraeni R., Carosone-Link P., Djelantik B., Setiawan E.P., Hartanto W.W., Ghanie A., Utama D.S., Lukman E., Winarto S., Dewi A.M.K., Rahardjo S.P., Djamin R., Mulyani T., Mutyara K., Kartasasmita C.B., Simões E.A.F. Otitis media related hearing loss in Indonesian school children. Int. J. Pediatr. Otorhinolaryngol. 2019;125:44–50. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2019.06.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Agha R., Abdall-Razak A., Crossley E., Dowlut N., Iosifidis C., Mathew G. STROCSS 2019 Guideline: Strengthening the reporting of cohort studies in surgery. Int. J. Surg. 2019;72:156–165. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2019.11.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.WHO . 2004. Chronic Suppurative Otitis Media: Burden of Illness and Management Options. [Google Scholar]
- 11.Jensen R.G., Koch A., Homøe P. The risk of hearing loss in a population with a high prevalence of chronic suppurative otitis media. Int. J. Pediatr. Otorhinolaryngol. 2013;77(9):1530–1535. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2013.06.025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Indorewala S., Adedeji T.O., Indorewala A., Nemade G. Tympanoplasty outcomes: a review of 789 cases. Iranian journal of otorhinolaryngology. 2015;27(79):101–108. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Sharma A., Baisakhiya N., Garg L.N., Singh G. Evaluation of role of mastoid surgery in the management of safe chronic suppurative otitis media. Indian J. Otolaryngol. : official publication of the Association of Otolaryngologists of India. 2016;68(4):434–440. doi: 10.1007/s12070-015-0921-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Agrawal A., Bhargava P. Comparative evaluation of tympanoplasty with or without mastoidectomy in treatment of chronic suppurative otitis media tubotympanic type. Indian J. Otolaryngol. : official publication of the Association of Otolaryngologists of India. 2017;69(2):172–175. doi: 10.1007/s12070-016-1038-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Basavaraj M.C., Jyothi P. Chronic suppurative otitis media (CSOM): etiological agents and antibiotic sensitivity pattern of the isolates. J. Med. 2015;16(2):79–82. [Google Scholar]
- 16.Kumari M.S., Meganadh K.R., Madhavi J., Jyothy A. Prevalence of otological disorders in diabetic cases with hearing loss. J. Diabetes Metabol. 2016;7(4):1–5. [Google Scholar]
- 17.Wang J., Chen B., Xu M., Wu J., Wang T., Zhao J., Zhang Q., Zhang Y. Etiological factors associated with chronic suppurative otitis media in a population of Han adults in China. Acta Otolaryngol. 2016;136(10):1024–1028. doi: 10.1080/00016489.2016.1183818. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Avnstorp M.B., Homøe P., Bjerregaard P., Jensen R.G. Chronic suppurative otitis media, middle ear pathology and corresponding hearing loss in a cohort of Greenlandic children. Int. J. Pediatr. Otorhinolaryngol. 2016;83:148–153. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2016.01.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Muftah S., Mackenzie I., Faragher B., Brabin B. Prevalence of chronic suppurative otitis media (CSOM) and associated hearing impairment among school-aged children in Yemen. Oman Med. J. 2015;30(5):358–365. doi: 10.5001/omj.2015.72. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Kim J., Jung G.H., Park S.Y., Lee W.S. Facial nerve paralysis due to chronic otitis media: prognosis in restoration of facial function after surgical intervention. Yonsei Med. J. 2012;53(3):642–648. doi: 10.3349/ymj.2012.53.3.642. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Choo J.C., Shaw C.L., Chong Y.C.S. Postauricular cutaneous mastoid fistula. J. Laryngol. Otol. 2004;118(11):893–894. doi: 10.1258/0022215042703633. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Sharma N., Jaiswal A.A., Banerjee P.K., Garg A.K. Complications of chronic suppurative otitis media and their management: a single institution 12 Years experience. Indian J. Otolaryngol. 2015;67(4):353–360. doi: 10.1007/s12070-015-0836-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Sadat H.M., Masoumeh S., Alireza K.S. Prevalence of hearing disorders among type 2 diabetes mellitus patients with and without vitamin D deficiency. Maedica (Bucur) 2020;15(1):32–36. doi: 10.26574/maedica.2020.15.1.32. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Baig M.M. Prevalence of cholesteatoma and its complications in patients of chronic suppurative otitis media. Journal of rawalpindi medical college. 2011;15(1):16–17. [Google Scholar]
- 25.Anil V. Clinical study of intact canal wall technique in the management of chronic suppurative otitis media. Int. J. Sci. Stud. 2017;5(7):65–70. [Google Scholar]
- 26.Cavel O., Ungar O.J., Oron Y., Ben Ami R., Dekel M., Handzel O. 2020. Outcome of Surgery for Chronic Suppurative Otitis Media with Resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa. European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology : Official Journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : Affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Jensen R.G., Homøe P., Andersson M., Koch A. Long-term follow-up of chronic suppurative otitis media in a high-risk children cohort. Int. J. Pediatr. Otorhinolaryngol. 2011;75(7):948–954. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2011.04.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Jensen R.G., Koch A., Homøe P. Long-term tympanic membrane pathology dynamics and spontaneous healing in chronic suppurative otitis media. Pediatr. Infect. Dis. J. 2012;31(2):139–144. doi: 10.1097/INF.0b013e318238c0a4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Thiel G., Rutka J.A., Pothier D.D. The behavior of mastoidectomy cavities following modified radical mastoidectomy. Laryngoscope. 2014;124(10):2380–2385. doi: 10.1002/lary.24610. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Kaur N., Sharma D.K., Singh J. Comparative evaluation of mastoid cavity obliteration by vascularised temporalis myofascial flap and deep temporal fascial-periosteal flap in canal wall down mastoidectomy. J. Clin. Diagn. Res. : J. Clin. Diagn. Res. 2016;10(12):MC08–MC11. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2016/21490.9121. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.