Abstract
Purpose
laparoscopic splenectomy (LS) gained popularity during the last years among pediatric surgeons. Benign hematological diseases represent the main indications of that procedure. There are some score systems of difficulty of the technique. Most of them are for adult patients. The aim is to develop a prognostic score system of LS in children with benign hematological diseases.
Methods
LS was performed in all children with benign hematological diseases. The children were operated in lateral decubitus position. The control of pedicle was achieved using bipolar sealing devices, polymer clips or endoscopic linear stablers. Preoperative, operative, and postoperative data were recorded and analyzed. Children were divided into two groups A and B according to the onset of complications.
Results
137 successive children were operated. The mean age of patients was 8.7 (4–15) years. The main indications of LS were thalassemia, spherocytosis, idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura (ITP), and sickle cell anemia (SCA). The mean length of splenic axis in thalassemia and spherocytosis cases was15.6 ± 2.3 cm. The mean amount of estimated blood loss (EABL) was 149 ± 43.2 ml in group A while it was 185 ± 44.4 ml in group B. The mean operative time in group A was 75.5 ± 22.5 min while it was 89.2 ± 20.6 min in group B.
Conclusion
the development of prognostic score of LS in children with benign hematological diseases can predict children who are more susceptible for complications. It helps to minimize these complications and improve the outcome of LS.
Keywords: Laparoscopic splenectomy, Children, Benign hematological diseases, Prognostic, Score
Highlights
-
•
Laparoscopic splenectomy in children gained popularity during last years.
-
•
The outcome of laparoscopic surgery is superior to conventional surgery.
-
•
Benign hematological diseases represent the main indication of splenectomy in children.
-
•
There is a need to develop a prognostic score of laparoscopic splenectomy in pediatric age group.
-
•
Method of pedicle control represents one of main prognostic factors.
1. Introduction
Laparoscopic splenectomy (LS) gained popularity since it has been described for the first-time during nineties of past century. It has become the “golden method” for splenectomy in all ages including children [1].
The main advantages of laparoscopic surgery are well presented in LS. Children who had LS had short hospital stay, lesser postoperative pain, earlier and more rapid tolerance of oral intake and better quality of life later [2,3].
Standardization of technique of LS takes place through years. There is some debate about securing splenic pedicle, technical complexity, and the suitable size of spleen for laparoscopy. The procedure needs excellent laparoscopic skills and well-equipped centers. There is still to some extent high conversion rate that reaches approximately 34%. However, conversion to conventional surgery is not considered failure of technique [4,5].
During the past years, several trials and reports were conducted to define whom patient might have technical difficulty. Some authors assumed that pathology, gender, splenic weight, and age had major effect on difficulty of procedure. However, there are other factors that may affect operative and postoperative results. In addition, these score systems were mainly designed for adult patients [6,7].
This study was performed to establish a score system that may help to detect prognosis of LS in children with benign hematological disease.
2. Methods
2.1. After obtaining institutional approval of the ethical committee board (approval code 33872/6/20)
The trial was registered at Clinical trials gov under identifier NCT04763733. Laparoscopic Splenectomy in Children - Full Text View - ClinicalTrials.gov.
A retrospective cohort study was performed for all children that had LS between 2007 and 2020. Data has been reported in line with the STROCSS criteria [8].
Children who had LS during the period between 2007 and 2012 were excluded from study. This was mainly applied to standardize technique and avoid any effects related to learning curve of pediatric surgical team. All children with benign hematological diseases were included in the current study. Malignant splenic conditions, traumatic cases or children that had previous partial splenectomy and require total splenectomy were excluded.
Preoperative abdominopelvic ultrasound was performed to document size of spleen and associated gall bladder stones in hemolytic anemia. Routine laboratory investigations and coagulation profile were obtained for every child.
2.2. Surgical procedure
LS was performed in right lateral decubitus position with an angle between side of child and table 60°. Three ports were used in all cases. An accessory port was used in extremely large spleens (more than 16 cm in long axis). Telescope 30° was used at the umbilical port. A working port was inserted midway between umbilicus and xyphoid process and another port was inserted in left midclavicular line. The accessory port was inserted in the left anterior axillary line if required. Pedicle control was achieved by either bipolar sealing devices (BSD), hem o lok clip or endoscopic straight linear stapler. Retrieval of spleen was either done through retrieval bag or Pfannesstiel incision in cases of huge spleen.
2.3. Statistical analysis
Statistical analysis was done using IBM SPSS V. 24 (IBM, NY, USA). A descriptive analysis was obtained for patients included in the study. Patients' characteristics were studied to identify candidate variables predictive of complication. These variables were used to develop a risk score using regression models. The score, and the best identified clinical cutoff point, underwent development, stability testing, and internal validation.
All patients were compared for differences in demographics, clinical variables using independent sample t-test or for continuous data, and χ2 test for categorical data. Statistically significant continuous variables were operationalized into categorical variables based on clinically relevant cutoffs and retested for statistical significance.
2.4. Risk score model building
Variables were deemed eligible for inclusion in the initial stage of model building if they were.
-
1
statistically significant at the univariate level after operationalization,
-
2
found in the literature to be relevant, and
-
3
was deemed by the study team that the variables were common enough to be risk factors for complications.
Pearson correlation coefficient as applied to detect the relationship between risk score categories and different operative measures.
The Receiver Operating Characteristics (ROC) analysis was performed to examine the ability of the score for predicting the prognosis of LS in children. It was mainly used to estimate the ability of score to differentiate children with no, moderate or high risk.
To determine the cutoff points of different variables, ROC was constructed for preoperative and operative variables.
3. Results
This study included 137 successive children with benign hematological diseases who had LS. The median age of patients was 8.7 years (4–15 years). The median body weight was 20.6 (12–33) kg. The main indications of LS were thalassemia, spherocytosis, idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura (ITP), and sickle cell anemia (SCA). There were 83 females. The mean length of splenic axis in thalassemia and spherocytosis cases was15.6 ± 2.3 cm. The mean length of splenic axis in sickle cell anemia cases was 12.4 ± 3.5 cm. The mean length of splenic axis in ITP cases was 10.2 ± 3.2 cm (Table 1).
Table 1.
Preoperative, operative variables.
| Variables | Group A (n = 96) |
Group B (n = 41) |
P | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hematological disease | |||||||
| ITP | 32 | 36.4% | 5 | 12.19% | |||
| Thalassemia | 30 | 27.3% | 17 | 41.46% | 0.007* | ||
| Spherocytosis | 20 | 21.6% | 12 | 29.26% | |||
| Sickle cell anemia | 14 | 14.8% | 7 | 17.07% | |||
| Splenic long axis | |||||||
| mean ± s.d | 12.6 | ± | 3.7 | 14.2 | ± | 3.5 | 0.014* |
| Range | 7.0 | – | 20.0 | 7.0 | – | 21.0 | |
| Estimated amount of Blood loss(ml) Mean ± SD |
142.9 | ± | 43.2 | 185.5 | ± | 44.4 | 0.012* |
| Pedicle control | 0.017* | ||||||
| - BSD | 41 | 42.7% | 8 | 19.5% | |||
| - Hem-o- lok | 38 | 39.5% | 12 | 29.2% | |||
| - Endoscopic linear stapler | 17 | 17.7 | 21 | 51.2% | |||
| Operative time | 75.5 | ± | 22.5 | 89.2 | ± | 20.6 | 0.001* |
| Hospital stay (median in days) and range | 1 | 4 | 0.001* | ||||
| 1–3 | 3–5 | ||||||
| Pancreatic injury | 62.0 | ± | 20.6 | 246.7 | ± | 121.4 | 0.001* |
| - Amylase (mean ± SD | |||||||
| - Lipase (mean ± SD U/l | |||||||
To build their score, authors studied the factors that may affect the prognosis of LS in children. These factors were two preoperative factors and two operative factors. The preoperative factors were the type of benign hematological disease and the long axis of spleen. The two operative factors were the estimated amount of blood loss (EABL) in ml and the method used for pedicle control. The analyzed parameters in relation to these factors were the operative time in minutes, hospital stay in days, visceral injury mainly pancreatic injuries which could be detected by measuring the levels of amylase and lipase in IU/dl and other complications that may take place according to Dindo classifications. Accordingly, children were categorized into groups, A and B. Group A(n = 96) included cases that pass smooth with no or minimal operative or postoperative difficulties and group B (n = 41) included children that had some operative and post-operative difficulties.
3.1. Preoperative data
There were 32 children with ITP, 30 children with thalassemia, 20 children with spherocytosis, and 17 children with SCA in group A. in group B there 5 children diagnosed as ITP, 17 children with thalassemia, 12 children with spherocytosis, and 7 children with SCA. The mean long axis of spleen was 12.6 ± 3.7 cm and 14.2 ± 3.5 cm in both groups respectively (Table 1).
3.2. Operative data
The mean amount of estimated blood loss (EABL) was 149 ± 43.2 ml in group A while it was 185 ± 44.4 ml in group B. In group A pedicle was controlled by BSD in 41 cases, Hem-o-lok in 38 cases and linear endoscopic stapler in 17 cases. In group B pedicle was controlled by BSD in eight cases, hem-o-lok in 12 cases and endoscopic linear stapler in 21 cases. was used to control hilum in 41 cases. The mean operative time in group A was 75.5 ± 22.5 min while it was 89.2 ± 20.6 min in group B (Table 1).
3.3. Postoperative data
The mean hospital stay in group A was 1.2 ± 0.7 days while it was 4.7 ± 1.8 days in group B. The mean levels of amylase were 62.0 ± 20.6 IU/l and 246.7 ± 121.4 IU/l in both groups, respectively. The mean level of lipase in group A was 53.5 ± 33.5 IU/l. Its level in group B was 247.2 ± 134.6 IU/l. According to Clavien- Dindo classification [9] of postoperative surgical complications, grade 1 complications occurred in 77 children, grade 2 occurred in 15 children while grade 3 developed in 4 cases in group A. In group B, grade 1 complications developed in 12 children, grade 2 occurred in 5 children and grade 3 complications occurred in 24 cases (Table 2).
Table 2.
Univariate analysis of group A and group B in the model development dataset regarding postoperative data.
| Group A |
Group B |
P | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (n = 96) | (n = 41) | ||||||
| Hospital stay | |||||||
| (Median in days) | 1 | 3 | 0.001* | ||||
| Range | 1–3 | 2–5 | |||||
| Pancreatic injury - Amylase Mean ± SD(ml) |
62.0 ± 20.6 | ||||||
| 246.7 | ± | 121.4 | - 0.001* | ||||
| - Lipase Mean ± SD (ml) |
53.5 | ± | 33.5 | 247.2 | ± | 134.6 | 0.001* |
| Dindo classification of surgical complications (No. of cases) | 0.014* | ||||||
| Grade 1 | 77 | 80.2% | 12 | 29.26% | |||
| Grade 2 | 15 | 15.6% | 5 | 12.19% | |||
| Grade 3 | 4 | 4.16% | 24 | 25% | |||
Multi variant analysis was performed to correlate operative and postoperative variables to predictors of difficulty of laparoscopic splenectomy. Then, the assumed score was built up (Table 3, Table 4).
Table 3.
Multiple variant analysis of predictors and outcomes.
| Operative Time |
Postoperative Complications |
Pancreatic Injury |
Hospital Stay |
||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amylase |
Lipase |
||||||||||||||
| OR | 95%CI | P | OR | 95%CI | P | OR | 95%CI | P | OR | 95%CI | P | OR | 95%CI | P | |
| Hematological disease | |||||||||||||||
| - ITP | Ref | ref | ref | ref | ref | ||||||||||
| - Spherocytosis | 10.29 | 1.23–85.84* | 0.001* | 1.07 |
0.27– 4.22 |
0.55 | 0.13–2.32 | 0.002* | 0.55 | 0.13–2.32 | 091 | 0.24–3.48 | |||
| - Thalassemia | 15.23 | 4.42–52.52* | 4.06 | 1.43–11.55* | 0.001* | 1.69 | 0.61–4.63 | 1.49 | 0.54–4.14 | 0.014* | 2.76 | 0.99–7.64 | 0.001* | ||
| - Sickle cell anemia | 7.17 | 2.16–23.78* | 1.66 | 0.58–4.78 | 0.51 | 0.16–1.58 | 0.41 | 0.12–1.356 | 0.71 | 0.23–2.17 | |||||
| Splenic pedicle control | |||||||||||||||
| - BSD | Ref | ref | ref | ref | ref | ||||||||||
| - Hem-o-lok | 0.178 | 0.07–0.47* | 0.013* | 0.33 | 0.09–1.13 | 0.015* | 0.24 | 0.05–1.23 | 0.023* | 0.14 | 0.02–1.23 | 0.001* | 0.37 | 0.09–1.53 | 0.001* |
| - Linear stapler | 3.06 | 1.23–7.65* | 2.25 | 2.09–13.20* | 5.19 | 1.92–14.06 | 6.22 | 2.20–17.58 | 6.79 | 2.50–18.41* | |||||
| EABL (median in ml) <150 ml vs > 150 ml |
3.91 | 1.92–7.95* | 0.001* | 6.20 | 2.65–14.47 | 0.001* | 4.05 | 1.66–9.89* | 0.001* | 5.58 | 2.10–14.81 | 0.021* | 5.23 | 2.16–12.66* | 0.015* |
| Splenic long axis (median in cm) <12 cm vs > 12 cm |
19.03 | 5.54–66.36* | 0.023* | 1.71 | 0.67–4.35 | 0.023* | 0.68 | 0.28–1.67 | 0.015* | 0.60 | 0.24–1.50 | 0.001* | 1.04 | 0.42–2.59 | 0.325 |
Table 4.
The assumed prognostic score of laparoscopic splenectomy in children with benign hematological diseases.
| Predictors | Scoring |
|---|---|
| Pathology | |
| ITP | 1 |
| Spherocytosis | 2 |
| Thalassemia | 3 |
| Sickle cell anemia | 4 |
| Splenic long axis | |
| < 12 cm | 1 |
| >12 cm | 2 |
| Pedicle control | |
| BSD | 1 |
| Hem -o- loc | 2 |
| Endoscopic linear Stapler | 3 |
| Blood loss | |
| ≤150 ml | 1 |
| >150 ml | 2 |
| Maximum total | 11 |
BSD: bipolar sealing device.
The Receiver Operating Characteristics (ROC) analysis was performed to examine the ability of the score to predict the prognosis of LS in children with benign hematological diseases. The area under the curve (AUC) was 0. 0.780 (P < 0.001) indicating predictive ability to predict the outcome. The score carried the sensitivity of 91.8% % in predicting the outcome with cutoff value of 5 (Table 5and Fig. 1).
Table 5.
Agreement (sensitivity, specificity and accuracy) for total scorewith outcome.
| ROC Curve | Cutoff | AUC | P | Sensitivity | Specificity |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 5 | 0.780* | 0.001 | 91.8% | 52.9% |
Fig. 1.
ROC curve of specificity and sensitivity of assumed score.
The correlation between the outcome variables and the total score using Pearson correlation showed significant relation with operative time, hospital stay, pancreatic injury and postoperative complications (Table 6).
Table 6.
Correlation between total score and outcome variables, Pearson correlation.
| Outcome variables | Total score |
|
|---|---|---|
| r/rho | p | |
| Operative time in minutes | 0.568 | 0.001* |
| Hospital stay in days | 0.370 | 0.001* |
| Pancreatic injury | ||
| - Amylase | 0.298 | 0.001* |
| - Lipase | 0.307 | 0.001* |
| Postoperative complications | 0.724 | 0.001* |
To validate this score, the study participates were divided into three groups according to the chosen cut-off value: no risk group (total score of <5 n = 46), moderate risk group (score of 5 till 8 n = 58) and high-risk group (score of 9–11 n = 33). (Table 7).
Table 7.
Stratification of children according to prognostic score into three risk groups.
| Variables | low risk |
Moderate risk |
High risk |
p | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (n = 46) | (n = 58) | (n = 33) | |||||
| Etiology | |||||||
| ITP | 36 | 78.3% | 0 | 0.0% | 1 | 3.0% | |
| Thalassemia | 8 | 17.4% | 22 | 37.9% | 13 | 39.4% | 0.001* |
| Spherocytosis | 1 | 2.2% | 25 | .1% | 11 | 33.3% | |
| SCA | 1 | 2.2% | 11 | 19.0% | 8 | 24.2% | |
| Pedicle control | |||||||
| Bipolar sealing devices | 24 | 52.2% | 10 | 17.2% | 13 | 39.4% | |
| Hem-o-lok | 11 | 23.9% | 30 | 51.7% | 4 | 12.1% | 0.001* |
| Stapler | 11 | 23.9% | 18 | 31.0% | 16 | 48.5% | |
| Operative time(mean and SD) | 61.3 | ±14.7 | 87.5 | ±22.1 | 91.6 | ±18.5 | 0.001* |
|
Pancreatic injury - Amylase ( mean and SD - lipase (mean and SD) |
33 23.9 |
±12.5 ±5.9 |
54.6 ± 76.3± |
12.5 17.3 |
88.7 97.5 |
±13.2 ±15.3 |
0.014* 0.001* |
| Postoperative complications (%) | 25 | 18.24% | 55 | 40.14% | 57 | 41.6% | 0.023* |
| Hospital stay (mean ± SD) | 1.4 | ±1 | 1.7 | ±1.1 | 2.3 | ±2 | 0.010* |
4. Discussion
LS has become the first choice among pediatric surgeons to manage children with benign hematological disease. It presents many advantages as it is more exploratory, safe procedure, lesser postoperative pain, shorter hospital stays, more cosmetic results with parents’ satisfaction when compared to conventional open splenectomy [10,11].
Despite the advantages of LS, there is still a strong need to stratify children in categories to detect whom may have difficult operative course or have postoperative complications.
Some authors aimed at developing a difficulty score of LS to prepare patients with more investigations, plan B activation and competent surgeons to operate. However, difficulties and postoperative complications are still present even with expert surgeons [12].
Two main issues are involved when discussing LS in children. These issues are rate of conversion to conventional open splenectomy and learning curve of the procedure.
As regard to the conversion of LS to open splenectomy, it is considered by several authors to be a primary outcome or end point of any difficulty scoring system. They studied the effect of preoperative and operative factors that may predict increasing rate of conversion. These factors included the weight of spleen and to some extent the fragile nature of spleen. Other factors included bleeding tendency and disturbed coagulation profile, decrease platelets count and increased frequency of blood transfusion. This may lead to sever intraoperative bleeding and termination of the laparoscopic procedure. There is a proportional relation between the occurrence of intractable bleeding during LS and the rate of conversion [13,14].
The rate of conversion of LS to conventional surgery may reach up to 35% in some reports. This conversion is not considered a complication rather than a safe step to reduce the incidence of morbidity or even mortality. This decision may increase hospital stay, total costs and may be associated with patients’ disappointment. The role of scoring system of LS difficulty is crucial to select the patient who is suitable to such procedure apart from occurrence of any post-operative complications [6].
Learning curve played an important role to master technique and reduce the personal factors that may lead to either operative difficulties or postoperative complications. Some authors assumed that a minimum of 20 cases was required to establish a safe LS [14].
Our study was designed to exclude cases that were converted to open splenectomy. This mainly was to build up a prognostic score of LS in children that may help to standardize technique in children and reduce to a great extent postoperative complication and hospital stay. The assumed prognostic scoring system aimed at incorporating preoperative factors as size of spleen and pathology together with method of pedicle control and estimated amount of blood loss.
There is significant relation between the nature of hematological disease and the outcome of LS. Children with SCA had the most difficult operative and prognostic courses. This was mainly explained by the natural pathology of the condition as it was associated with extensive peri-splenic adhesions due to healing of attacks of sequestrations. On the other hand, LS due to ITP had much better prognosis. Splenic size is usually small and no adhesions. Methods of controlling pedicle of spleen affect the prognosis. During current study authors depended on the mean length of splenic long axis as an index of splenic size. The longer this axis the more difficult the procedure. This was mainly attributed to decrease the laparoscopic space. Detecting the long axis of spleen was estimated by abdominal ultrasound. This helped to reduce unnecessary exposure of children to high doses of ionized radiation of CT.
Using BSD was associated with shorter operative time and lesser needs to more dissection along the course of splenic vessels and tail of pancreas. In contrast to the use of either Hem-O-Lok or endoscopic linear stabler which required skeletonization of adequate segment of pedicle. This was associated by increased of the mean EABL, longer operative time and increased manipulation on pancreas and pancreatic injury.
Cases with increased EABL were associated with longer hospital stay, more risk of pancreatic injury and higher incidence of complications.
This assumed score helped our team to stratify children into three groups according to postoperative prognosis. These groups are low, intermediate and high-risk group.
The conversion of LS to conventional open splenectomy was the main issue of Peng and his colleagues. They developed a scoring system that depended on three preoperative factors, weight of spleen, INR and esophagogastric varices. This mainly was to predict technical difficulties of the procedure as occurrence of sever bleeding. They excluded cases that had high score according to their study. Also, there was insignificant effect of the pathological conditions of spleen on the primary outcome. This score was designed to deal with certain conditions, adult patients, and certain ethnic groups of people. These considerations limit the validity of assumed score to be applied on children [15].
Luppi and his colleagues studied anatomical, clinical, and pathological factors that may affect the difficulty of LS. These factors were age, sex, splenic weight, and pathology. All these factors were preoperative and designed to predict difficult cases to be excluded from laparoscopic approach. These parameters were preoperatively investigated and determined. However, some factors as pedicle control maneuvers and EABL were not assessed. Also, this grading system was mainly applied in adult patients [6].
Some unique complications may occur during LS in children. Pancreatic injury is one of these complications. It is not related to any preoperative factors but mostly related to the way by which pedicle was controlled. Chand documented that pancreatic injury was the main complication that occurred in his series. The notable issue during his study was the use of endoscopic linear stapler to control the pedicle [16].
During the current study, it is observed that the incidence of pancreatic injury increases when endoscopic stapler used to control the pedicle. This may be explained by the need to dissect a considerable length of splenic pedicle to fit the stapler jaw. Due to the anatomical relation of the distal pancreas and the splenic hilum, the dissection is carried out near the tail of pancreas and may cause injury.
With the application of Clavien-Dindo classification of postoperative complications during LS in children, the current study showed that the reported complications were associated with difficult cases where there was splenomegaly, prolonged operative time, increased amount of blood loss or use of endoscopic staplers.
Goncalves depended on Clavien-Dindo classification to describe the pattern of complications following LS in their cohort. They found that the rate of complications was increased when there were prolonged operative time, bleeding of more than 500 ml or conversion to open splenectomy [12].
The limitations of the current study are that it is retrospective single center experience.
However, according to available data this is the first study designed to develop a prognostic score of LS in children with benign hematological diseases (Table 8).
Table 8.
Different scoring systems in similar studies.
| Age group of patients (years) | Sample size (No. of patients) | Type of study | Pathological conditions | Aim of scoring system | Assessed variables | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current study | 8 (4–15) years | 137 | Retrospective cohort | Benign hematological diseases | Prognostic | - etiology - splenic size - pedicle control - blood loss during LS |
| Luppi (6) | 40 (3–88)years | 439 | retrospective study | - ITP - Other benign conditions - Malignant |
Technical difficulty | - Age - Gender - Pathology - Splenic weight (g) - Difficulty grade |
| Goncalves (12) | 38(18–88)years | 153 | Retrospective | - ITP - Benign lesions - Malignant |
Validation of difficulty grading score | - Age - Gender - Pathology - Splenic weight (g) - Difficulty grading |
| Peng (15) | 46(36–54.5) years | 272 | Randomized study | - Hypersplenism - Benign lesions - Malignant |
Prediction of difficulty | - Splenic weight(g) - EGV - INR |
LS: laparoscopic splenectomy.
EGV: Esophagogastric varices.
INR: international normalization ratio.
5. Conclusion
The assumed prognostic score of LS in children can stratify patients according to the prognosis of the procedure and predict whom children may be at risk of developing postoperative complications. Also, it is specific to age group and particular group of diseases of that age group.
Provenance and peer review
Not commissioned, externally peer reviewed.
Ethical approval
Research has obtained ethical approval by Ethical Board Review: Approval code 33872/6/20. Faculty of Medicine, Tanta University.
Sources of funding
Authors stated that there is no sources of funding of that research.
Conflicts of interest
Authors stated that there is no conflicts of interest.
Author contribution
Mohammad Gh. Khirallah: conceptualization, methodology, operative procedures writing, editing and supervision – Ebrahim Ali Kabbash: investigation, formal analysis, reviewing and editing - Nagi Ibrahim El-Dessouki: methodology, operative procedures and edition.
Registration of Research studies
Name of the registry: clinicaltrials.gov.
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04763733.
Consent
A signed informed consent was obtained from the parents of children subjected to the procedure.
Guarantor
Mohammad Gharieb Khirallah, assistant professor and consultant of pediatric surgery, Tanta University Hospitals, Tanta University.
Acknowledgements
None.
Footnotes
Supplementary data to this article can be found online at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amsu.2021.102463.
Appendix A. Supplementary data
The following is the Supplementary data to this article:
References
- 1.Fisichella P.M., Wong Y.M., Pappas S.G., Abood G.J. Laparoscopic splenectomy: perioperative management, surgical technique, and results. J. Gastrointest. Surg. 2014;18:404–410. doi: 10.1007/s11605-013-2366-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Khirallah M., Salam H., Arafa M., Eldussoki N., El-Shanshory M. Analysis of risk factors of pancreatic injury during Elective laparoscopic splenectomy in children. J. Indian Assoc. Pediatr. Surg. 2019;24:180–184. doi: 10.4103/jiaps.JIAPS_64_18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Radkowiak D., Zychowicz A., Lasek A., Wysocki M., Major P., Pedziwiatr M., Budzynski P., Kulawik J., Budzynski A. 20 years' experience with laparoscopic splenectomy. Single center outcomes of a cohort study of 500 cases. Int. J. Surg. 2018;52:285–292. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2018.02.042. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Utria A.F., Goffredo P., Keck K., Shelton J.S., Shilyansky J., Hassan I. Laparoscopic splenectomy: has it become the standard surgical approach in pediatric patients? J. Surg. Res. 2019;240:109–114. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2019.02.045. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Shin R.D., Lis R., Levergood N.R., Brooks D.C., Shoji B.T. Tavakkoli A Laparoscopic versus open splenectomy for splenomegaly: the verdict is unclear. Surg. Endosc. 2019;33:1298–1303. doi: 10.1007/s00464-018-6394-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Luppi C.R.O., Targarona Soler E.M., Balague Ponz C., Pantoja Millan J.P., Turrado Rodriguez V., Pallares Segura J.L., Bollo Rodriguez J., Trias Folch M. Clinical, anatomical, and pathological grading score to predict technical difficulty in laparoscopic splenectomy for non-traumatic diseases. World J. Surg. 2017;41:439–448. doi: 10.1007/s00268-016-3683-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Yu H., Guo S., Wang L., Dong Y., Tian G., Mu S., Zhang H., Li D., Zhao S. Laparoscopic splenectomy and esophagogastric devascularization for liver cirrhosis and portal hypertension is a safe, effective, and minimally invasive operation. J. Laparoendosc. Adv. Surg. Tech. Part A. 2016;26:524–530. doi: 10.1089/lap.2016.0032. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Agha R., Abdall-Razak A., Crossley E., Dowlut N., Iosifidis C., Mathew G., for the Strocss Group The STROCSS 2019 guideline: strengthening the reporting of cohort studies in surgery. Int. J. Surg. 2019;72:156–165. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2019.11.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Dindo D., Demartines N., Clavien P.A. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in cohort of 6336 patients and results of survey. Ann. Surg. 2004;240:205–213. doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000133083.54934(. .ae ) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Bai Y.-N., Jiang H., Parsoon P. A meta-analysis of perioperative outcomes of laparoscopic splenectomy for hematological disorders. World J. Surg. 2012;36:2349–2358. doi: 10.1007/s00268-012-1680-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Khirallah M., Eldossuki N., Elayed H., Elshanshory M. Laparoscopic versus open splenectomy in children with benign hematological diseases. Ann Ped Surg. 2017;13:194–198. doi: 10.1097/01.XPS.0000522255.44536.30. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Goncalves D., Morais M., Costa-Pinho A., Bessa-Melo R., Graca L., Costa-Maia J. Validation of a difculty grading score in laparoscopic splenectomy. J. Laparoendosc. Adv. Surg. Tech. Part A. 2018;28:242–247. doi: 10.1089/lap.2017.0478. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Matharoo G.S., Afthinos J.N., Gibbs K.E. Trends in splenectomy: where does laparoscopy stand? J. Soc. Laparoendosc. Surg. 2014;18(4):e2014. doi: 10.4293/jsls.2014.00239. Marte G, Scuderi V, Rocca A, Surfaro G, Migliaccio C, Ceriello A. Laparoscopic splenectomy: a single center experience Unusual cases and expanded inclusion criteria for laparoscopic approach. Updates Surg, 2013; 65:115–119 doi: 10.1007/s13304-013-0197-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Fraser S.A., Bergman S., Garzon J. Laparoscopic splenectomy: learning curve comparison between benign and malignant disease. Surg. Innovat. 2012;19:27–32. doi: 10.1177/1553350611410891. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Peng L., You Li, Ding Hong-Fan, Dong Ding-Hui, Zhang Xu-Feng, Liu Xue-Min, Lv Yi, Xiang Jun-Xi. A novel preoperative scoring system to predict technical difficulty in laparoscopic splenectomy for non-traumatic diseases. Surg. Endosc. 2020:1–8. doi: 10.1007/s00464-019-07327-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Chand B., Walsh R.M., Ponsky J., Brody F. Pancreatic complications following laparoscopic splenectomy. Surg. Endosc. 2001;15:1273–1276. doi: 10.1007/s004640080054. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

