Abstract
Background: In the kidney glucose is freely filtered by the glomerulus and, mainly, reabsorbed by sodium glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) expressed in the early proximal tubule. Human proximal tubule epithelial cells (PTECs) undergo pathological and fibrotic changes seen in diabetic kidney disease (DKD) in response to elevated glucose. We developed a specific in vitro model of DKD using primary human PTECs with exposure to high D-glucose and TGF-β1 and propose a role for SGLT2 inhibition in regulating fibrosis. Methods: Western blotting was performed to detect cellular and secreted proteins as well as phosphorylated intracellular signalling proteins. qPCR was used to detect CCN2 RNA. Gamma glutamyl transferase (GT) activity staining was performed to confirm PTEC phenotype. SGLT2 and ERK inhibition on high D-glucose, 25 mM, and TGF-β1, 0.75 ng/ml, treated cells was explored using dapagliflozin and U0126, respectively. Results: Only the combination of high D-glucose and TGF-β1 treatment significantly up-regulated CCN2 RNA and protein expression. This increase was significantly ameliorated by dapagliflozin. High D-glucose treatment raised phospho ERK which was also inhibited by dapagliflozin. TGF-β1 increased cellular phospho SSXS Smad3 serine 423 and 425, with and without high D-glucose. Glucose alone had no effect. Smad3 serine 204 phosphorylation was significantly raised by a combination of high D-glucose+TGF-β1; this rise was significantly reduced by both SGLT2 and MEK inhibition. Conclusions: We show that high D-glucose and TGF-β1 are both required for CCN2 expression. This treatment also caused Smad3 linker region phosphorylation. Both outcomes were inhibited by dapagliflozin. We have identified a novel SGLT2 -ERK mediated promotion of TGF-β1/Smad3 signalling inducing a pro-fibrotic growth factor secretion. Our data evince support for substantial renoprotective benefits of SGLT2 inhibition in the diabetic kidney.
Keywords: Diabetic Kidney Disease, Glucose, Fibrosis, Smad3, Glucose Transporters, Dapagliflozin
Introduction
Diabetic kidney disease (DKD) is a multifactorial condition and major complication of diabetes. Data indicate that between 20 and 40% of patients with diabetes develop diabetic kidney disease. The global prevalence of diabetes is predicted to rise from 450 to 600 million by 2040 [1]. With the number of patient diagnoses only expected to rise, the battle to prevent established kidney disease remains a prevalent healthcare challenge. The result of chronic exposure to raised glucose and spikes of severe hyperglycaemia results in pathological changes to the kidney including mesangial expansion, glomerular and tubular hypertrophy along with glomerulosclerosis and tubulointerstitial fibrosis [2]. The severity of tubulointerstitial fibrosis is an important determinant of progressive loss of renal function [3,4] and failure to intervene early in the unrelenting fibrotic process can lead to end stage renal disease. The identification of novel biomarkers of renal disease in diabetic patients such as cystatin C and kidney injury molecule-1, have contributed to an important shift to a ‘tubulocentric’ view on the development and progression of DKD with the proximal tubule epithelial cell (PTEC) being the major cell type involved in this perspective [5,6].
Sodium glucose transporters (SGLT2) inhibitors, also known as gliflozins, are the most recent class in a long line of anti-diabetic drugs approved by the FDA [7]. The underlying principle behind these gliflozins is that by blocking glucose entry at the PTEC via the inhibition of the transporter, glucose reabsorption is reduced, thus inducing glycosuria and decreasing plasma glucose concentrations [8,9]. Mutations in the SGLT2 gene are linked to familial renal glycosuria where abnormal glucose excretion into the urine occurs with no adverse effects on their health [10–12]. Evidence from these patients indicated that SGLT2 could be targeted to increase glucose loss in the urine without deleterious effects. Phlorizin was the first naturally occurring gliflozin to be discovered but was found to be a non-specific SGLT Inhibitor and dapagliflozin was later developed as an alternative. Dapagliflozin maintains a 1200 fold selectivity for hSGLT2 (Ki = 6 nM) over hSGLT1 (Ki = 360 nM) coupled with a dissociation rate that is approximately 10-fold lower [13].
Additionally, a type 2 diabetic db/db mouse study found that treatment with the SGLT2 inhibitor empagliflozin also reduced tubulointersitial fibrosis, observed through the significant decrease of α1(I) collagen and fibronectin abundance in kidney sections [14]. Thus, we hypothesised that reducing PTEC glucose uptake with the SGLT2 inhibitor dapagliflozin would result in a reduction in the fibrotic response in human cells. In addition to a chronic difficulty regulating circulating glucose patients with diabetes can suffer from rapid spikes in blood glucose levels which may not be reflected in HbA1c levels. We developed a model using primary human PTEC with acute exposure to high glucose to mimic these spikes.
The current diagnostic criteria for DKD include established diabetes and albuminuria. A consequence of PTEC exposure to albumin is the megalin independent expression of TGF-β1 [15]. TGF-β1 is a pleiotropic protein involved in a plethora of functions including fibrosis. One of the major molecular pathways driving renal fibrosis is believed to be the canonical TGF-β1/Smad3 pathway. Results published by Zorena et al. indicated that serum TGF-β1 levels was the most ‘discriminate power’ when compared with several other variables including blood pressure, HbA1c and creatinine in predicting diabetic outcomes in a group of ‘juvenile patients’. They determined the cut-off threshold concentration for TGF-β1 where it relates to diabetes induced complications was 0.443 ng/ml. We have therefore incorporated a threshold concentration of TGF-β1 as part of our in vitro model [16].
Connective tissue growth factor (CCN2), a secreted 36/38kDa pro-fibrotic marker, has also been implicated in DKD [17]. It has a characteristic doublet consistent with partial glycosylation and is known to act downstream of TGF-β1 [18]. FG-3019, a fully human monoclonal neutralising antibody against CCN2, has been shown to reduce fibrosis and significantly reduce albumin creatinine ratio in diabetic patients, supporting the proposal that CCN2 is an effective target for the treatment of DKD [19]. A clinical study showed that the abundance of urinary CCN2 N-terminal fragments increased 10-fold when comparing microalbuminuric and normoalbuminuric diabetic patients, directly correlating with the severity of proteinuria and therefore the rate of DKD progression [20].
In this work, we investigate the induction of CCN2 in primary human PTECs and have sought to determine the molecular basis underlying the pro-fibrotic response. We have delineated a role for SGLT2 in the regulation of a pro-fibrotic number of intracellular signalling cascades and hence, offer a novel target for the treatment of tubulointerstitial fibrosis in DKD.
Materials and methods
Cell culture
In house human primary PTECs were previously isolated and characterised by Percoll density gradient centrifugation [21], while PTECs isolated from other donors were purchased from Lonza, U.S.A. Phenotype was confirmed by Gamma GT activity (Supplementary Figure S4). Adult human dermal fibroblasts were purchased from Cell Biologics, U.S.A. In house PTECs were cultured in a mixture of Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle medium (DMEM) and Ham’s Nutrient (F12). This was supplemented with heat inactivated fetal bovine serum (FBS, 10%), insulin (5 µg/ml), transferrin (5 µg/ml), sodium selenite (5 ng/ml), hydrocortisone (36 ng/ml), epidermal growth factor (10 ng/ml), penicillin (100 U/ml), streptomycin (100 µg/ml), tri-iodothyronine (4 pg/ml) and L-glutamine (2 mM). Lonza PTECS were cultured in renal epithelial basal and growth medium (REBM™/REGM™, Lonza). Fibroblasts were cultured in complete fibroblast medium (Cell Biologics). All medium were sterile filtered using a 0.2 µM Puradisc™ (Whatman) and changed on alternate days. All cells were grown under 5% CO2 humidity at 37°C on T75 tissue culture flasks and 35 mm culture dishes (Corning).
Collagen IV coating
Human placenta collagen IV (Sigma) was reconstituted in sterile 0.25% acetic acid and coated onto both tissue culture flasks and dishes (Corning) at 5 μg/cm2. After all culture-ware with collagen IV was exposed to UV radiation for 20 min, the coating was left to incubate overnight at room temperature. Flasks and dishes were then rinsed once using sterile PBS and air dried before use.
Cell subculture and cryopreservation
After cells reached approximately 85% in confluence, the culture medium was removed and cell dissociated with trypsin-EDTA solution for 5 min at 37°C. When detached, the cell suspension was aspirated and centrifuged at 1500 rpm (327 g) for 6 min. The supernatant was discarded and the pellet re-suspended in fresh medium. Live cells were counted after mixing with trypan blue solution (Sigma) using an automated cell counter (Bio-Rad). PTECs and fibroblasts were seeded onto 35 mm collagen IV coated dishes at a density of 2500 and 5000 cells/cm2, respectively.
Treatment and inhibitors
Cells were serum starved for 24 h prior to treatment. All subsequent conditions were supplemented with 0.1% BSA. Cells were exposed to three different conditions: (i) 7 mM D-glucose (control); (ii) 7 mM D-glucose + 18 mM D-glucose (high D-glucose or D-Glu); and (iii) 7 mM D-glucose + 18 mM L- glucose (osmotic control or L-Glu), with or without TGF-β1 0.75 ng/ml (Sigma-Aldrich). We used L-glucose to account for the osmotic stress the cells are subjected to upon >7 mM glucose treatment as osmotic stress is known to activate ERK in renal epithelial cells [22]. The SGLT2 inhibitor dapagliflozin (Cayman Chemical) was administered at 0.1, 1, or 10 nM while MEK/ERK inhibitor U0126 (Sigma-Aldrich) was administered at 10 μM. Treatment times ranged from 5 min to 24 h.
Protein lysis and assay
The medium was removed from cell cultures and stored at −70°C. Cells were then rinsed with ice cold PBS. To obtain whole cell protein, cells were scraped from dishes and homogenised in ice cold lysis buffer (Tris-HCl, 20 mM at pH 7.2, EDTA, 1 mM, SDS 0.1%, sodium deoxycholate 0.5%, Triton X-100 1%) and 10 ml/l EASYpack protease inhibitor and PHOSstop phosphatase inhibitor cocktails (Roche). This mixture was placed on ice for 15 min prior to centrifugation for 10 min at 10000 rpm (6720 g). The lysed protein in the supernatant was then removed and stored at −70°C until use. Bicinchoninic acid assay (Pierce) was used to determine protein concentration of the lysate as per the manufacturer’s protocol.
Western blot
Equal amounts of protein (20/25 µg per sample) were boiled in 2× Laemmli buffer (Bio-Rad) with 5% mercaptoethanol for 5 min at 95°C and separated on either 4-15%, 7.5% or 10% ‘Mini-PROTEAN TGX Stain-Free’ gels (Bio-Rad) for ∼25 min at 220 V. Images of gel proteins were captured on the ChemiDoc™ Touch system (Bio-Rad) before the transfer onto polyvinylidene (PVDF) membranes for total protein normalisation and adjustment for loading. Blots were blocked with 5% non-fat milk, in tris-buffered saline-tween (TBST), and incubated overnight at 4°C with rabbit polyclonal anti SGLT2 (1:500, Santa Cruz), rabbit polyclonal anti CCN2 (1:500, Invitrogen), rabbit polyclonal anti-phospho-ERK (1:1000, CST), rabbit polyclonal anti phospho-Smad3(SSpXSp) (1:1000, CST), or rabbit polyclonal anti phospho-Smad3 LR serine 204 (1:1000, Abcam). Blots were washed in TBST three times and incubated with an anti-rabbit IgG horseradish peroxidase (HRP) conjugate secondary antibody for an hour at room temperature (1:2000, New England Biolabs). Immunostained proteins were also captured on the ChemiDoc™ imager. Protein abundance analysis was carried out using ImageLab™ software (Bio-Rad) where target protein density was expressed relative to the amount of total protein. Polyacrylamide gel containing a proprietary trihalo compound to make proteins fluorescent directly in the gel with a short photoactivation, allowing the immediate visualisation of proteins. Following polyacrylamide gel elxtropheresis. Gels were placed in a ChemiDoc™ Imaging (Bio-Rad) system for activation by exposure to UV light for 1 min. A stain-free image was taken using the imaging system for total protein measurement in each lane. Image data were analysed using Image 4.1 software (Bio-Rad). Stain-Free gels provide a linear dynamic range between 10 and 80 µg of total protein load. The total density for each lane is measured from the blot and a lane profile is obtained. The background is adjusted in such a way that the total background is subtracted from the sum of density of all the bands in each lane (referred to as the rolling disk background subtraction algorithm).The software interprets the raw data in three dimensions with the length and width of the band defined by the ‘Lanes and Bands’ tool in concert with the ‘Lane Profile’ tool such that the chemiluminescent signal emitted from the blot is registered in the third dimension as a peak rising out of the blot surface. The density of a given band was measured as the total volume under the three-dimensional peak, which could be viewed in two dimensions using the ‘Lane Profile’ tool to adjust the precise width of the band to account for the area under the peak of interest. An example total protein gel is presented in Figure 1.
Heparin bead purification
For the analysis of proteins with heparin binding domains, media from treated cells were mixed together at a 10:1 ratio with heparin-agarose bead suspension (Sigma-Aldrich). Medium and bead suspension were mixed on a roller for 6 h. Tubes were then centrifuged at 4°C for 10 min at 10,000 rpm (10,060 g) (Hettich Mikro), and the supernatant was discarded. The beads were then rinsed in ice-cold PBS twice and heparin bound proteins were subsequently extracted and separated as detailed in the above Western blot section.
qPCR
Complementary DNA (cDNA) was produced via a reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) using the High Capacity cDNA Reverse Transcription kit (Life Technologies). Sample cDNA, glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) housekeeping primers, CCN2 Taqman gene expression assay and Taqman gene expression master mix were then mixed together on a 96-well PCR plate (Bio-Rad). Real time quantification of gene target(s) was carried out using the CFX1000 Real Time system thermocycler (Bio-Rad) under the pre-optimised qPCR thermal cycler program. CFX manager software was used to analyse the results. The fold changes in cDNA expression were presented as values normalised to the housekeeping gene using the ∆Ct method.
The following primer probe sets (Life Technologies) were all pre-validated at standardised conditions:
Gene | Assay ID | Reference sequence |
---|---|---|
GAPDH | Hs99999905_m1 | NM_002046.3 |
CCN2/CTGF | Hs00170014_m1 | NM_001901.2 |
Gamma GT staining
Confluent dishes of PTECs were stained with a solution of 6 mM glutamic acid γ-(4-methoxy-β-naphthylamide), 4 mM glycyl-glycine, 1.1 mM Fast Blue B Salt, 100 mM NaCl, and 25 mM Tris at pH 7.4 (Sigma Aldrich) in deionised water for 45 min at room temperature. Cells were then washed with PBS before examination under the microscope. Distinct orange-red staining confirmed presence of the enzyme.
Statistical analysis
Statistical analysis on all treatments was performed on GraphPad Prism 7 (GraphPad Software Inc) where P values < 0.05 were considered statistically significant. Comparison between two means was carried out using unpaired t-test. Comparison of the means of more than two groups was carried out using analysis of variance (ANOVA) with Bonferroni’s post hoc test. Values are reported as mean ± standard deviation (SD).
The use of all human tissue was carried out with the approval of the South London and Surrey Research Ethics Committee, REC reference number 08/H0806/8.
Results
The effect of high glucose and TGF-β1 on CCN2 production in human PTECs
Upon treatment, neither exposure to TGF-β1 0.75 ng/ml nor 25 mM D-Glucose (D-Glu) was found to be sufficient to produce a significant increase in CCN2 secretion within 24 h. However, the combination of D-Glu + TGF-β1 significantly increased the secretion of the glycosylated and non-glycosylated isoforms of CCN2, 38 and 36 kDa (P<0.05, n=3) (Figure 1A–C).
The effect of SGLT2 inhibition on CCN2 protein secretion and mRNA expression
TGF-β1 (0.75 ng/ml) induction of CCN2 was dependent on high D-glucose; this was seen in both glycosylated and non-glycosylated protein, suggesting a transcriptional or post-translational regulation.
The effect of SGLT2 inhibition using dapagliflozin was assessed at the level of RNA and protein expression. Dapagliflozin (0.1–10 nM) completely inhibited D-Glu+TGF-β1 induced CCN2 protein secretion to levels comparable with the L-glucose control (P<0.01, n=5) (Figure 2A,B), CCN2 mRNA abundance was significantly reduced by the two higher concentrations (1 and 10 nM) at 24 h (P<0.05, n=12) (Figure 2C). The effect of D-Glu+TGF-β1 with and without dapagliflozin was observed in cells from all donors (Supplementary Figure S2).
Investigating the point of convergence of high glucose and TGF-β1 stimulation
We next investigated putative signalling pathways that may be involved in facilitating this synergistic up-regulation of CCN2. Based on our previous work [22], we investigated the role of ERK and Smad3. In addition to the canonical phosphorylation of the MH2 domain by the TGFβ receptor complex, Smad3 activity can be regulated by phosphorylation of the linker region [23]. Although ERK and Smad3 are both established downstream mediators of TGF-β signalling, the linker region of Smad3 has been studied to a much lesser extent.
There was no detectable change in phosphorylated ERK levels over 5-60 min in the presence of the osmotic control (L-Glu). Treatment with TGF-β1 phosphorylated ERK from 5 to 60 min whilst high D-glucose alone increased phosphorylated ERK in an acute manner at 30 min before it returned to basal levels by 60 min (P<0.05, n=4) (Figure 3A–F).
Similar to ERK, Smad3 was rapidly phosphorylated at the MH2 domain (serine 423 and 425) by TGF-β1, which reached statistical significance at 30 min. (P<0.01, n=3) (Figure 3G–L).
Phosphorylated Smad3 LR (Linker Region) serine 204 was detected with immunoreactive bands of approximately 25, 50 and 75 kDa visible. There was marked induction of Smad3 LR serine 204 phosphorylation by the specific combination of D-Glu+TGF-β1 at 30 min compared with all other treatments (P<0.05, n=3).
The effect of MEK and SGLT2 inhibition on phosphorylation of Smad3 serine 204 and ERK
As shown above, high glucose treatment resulted in elevated phosphorylated ERK from 15 to 45 min. Co-incubation of Dapagliflozin with D-Glu+TGFβ1 significantly inhibited ERK phosphorylation observed following D-Glu + TGFβ1 treatment (Figure 4 A,B) (P<0.01, n=3). As previously observed, phosphorylation of Smad3 at serine 204 was significantly higher in the PTECS treated with high glucose compared with the osmotic control in the presence of TGF-β1. Dapagliflozin treatment was also able to significantly reduce Smad3 serine 204 phosphorylation (Figure 4C,D) (P<0.05, n=3). Finally, to test whether ERK phosphorylation is upstream of Smad3 serine 204 phosphorylation U0126, a MEK inhibitor was used (U0126 efficacy in reducing ERK phosphorylation was confirmed in Supplementary Figure S3). Smad3 serine 204 phosphorylation was significantly reduced to basal levels by pre-incubation of cells with 10 μM U0126 (P<0.05, n=3; Figure 4E,F).
Discussion
We have studied the role of extracellular D-glucose in mediating TGF-β1/Smad3 signalling and modulating the expression of CCN2 in human proximal tubule cells. The CCN2 promoter contains a Smad-binding element (SBE) that is a well-documented target of TGFβ1/Smad3. There are two apical glucose transporters expressed in the proximal tubule: SGLT1 and SGLT2. SGLT2 is a high capacity/low affinity glucose transporter primarily localised in the S1 and S2 segment of the proximal tubule whilst SGLT1 is a low capacity, high affinity glucose transporter found in the S3 segment. Our study specifically investigated SGLT2 using dapagliflozin which has an approximate 1200-fold selectivity for SGLT2 over SGLT1 [13]. To activate TGFβ1/Smad3, we incubated cells with 0.75 ng/ml TGF-β1 which resulted in significant phosphorylation of Smad 3 MH2 SSVS domain. This domain is the target of the TGFβ type 1 receptor (TβRI), however, at this dose, this was insufficient to induce CCN2 expression. Co-incubation of TGFβ1 with high D-glucose significantly induced CCN2 expression. This was shown to be SGLT2 dependent. We then go on to describe the dapagliflozin/U0126 sensitive glucose induction of serine 204 phosphorylation on a truncated isoform of Smad3.
The primary PTECs used in these experiments were from three separate donors and contain cells derived from all three segments. Therefore, we expect that our results may differ from those using transformed cells lines as the latter are derived from a single clonal expansion. They were cultured on collagen IV, the main extracellular matrix component in the tubular basement membrane (TBM) of the human kidney [24]. This allows for a similar TBM cellular interaction as seen in cells in vivo which is important for the regulation of the cell phenotype. Our primary cultures of PTECs expressed both SGLT1 and 2 mRNA. SGLT2 protein was also consistently detected by Western blotting of approximately 25 μg protein (Supplementary Figure S4) with kidney cortical lysate providing positive control for the detection of SGLT2 protein. Fibroblasts were also run alongside PTECs to act as a negative control (Supplementary Figure S1).
We chose to normalise our target band densities against the total protein visualised in our electrophoresis gel using the trademarked stain-free imaging technology recently developed by Biorad. As briefly mentioned in our results section, this technology employs a patented trihalocompound in a polyacrylamide gel which strengthens the fluorescent signal of tryptophan amino acids after a short photo-activation upon exposure to UV light. As these fluorophores are covalently bound to the protein, they can be easily captured without the need for a laborious staining and de-staining protocol. We opted to use this method instead of the traditional housekeeping protein normalisation, which is often unreliable, as it allows researchers to acquire more accurate data by dividing band densities with total lane protein.
Our study has investigated the efficacy of the diabetic class of drugs gliflozins on ameliorating diabetes associated fibrotic changes in human renal cells by targeting the underlying molecular mechanisms. There is currently no pharmacotherapy for renal fibrosis. We have focused on dapagliflozin, which was licensed for use in the US in October 2019 after the DECLARE-TIMI 58 trial showed that the drug successfully reduced the risk of hospitalisation for heart failure (HF) in adults with type 2 diabetes [25]. The data we have presented is derived from a cell culture model of DKD. Cells were exposed to raised glucose levels, to replicate hyperglycaemic peaks seen in patients, and TGF-β1. Albuminuria is a common characteristic of DKD and albumin stimulates TGF-β1 expression in PTECs. There is also evidence for significantly elevated urinary TGF-β1 in patients with diabetes when compared with healthy controls [26]. We believe this model recreates many important features of diabetic tubular disease observed in patients and can be a valuable tool for the study of some aspects of DKD, particularly the role of SGLT2.
TGF-β1 is a pleiotropic protein involved in a plethora of crucial functions including cell differentiation, wound repair and inflammation [27,28]. Smads are the canonical intracellular signalling molecules activated by TGF-β1. Following binding of TGF-β1 the type II receptor recruits and phosphorylates the type I receptor. The type I receptor in turn recruits receptor Smad dimers and phosphorylates the SSXS motif at the carboxy-terminal. The phosphorylated receptor Smads can form heteromeric complexes with Smad4. This heterotrimeric complex can then translocate to the nucleus to regulate transcription. In parallel, noncanonical signalling acts through Smad independent protein kinases such as MEK/ERK and p38 [29]. TGF-β1 is a key driver of fibrosis in the kidney and has been proposed as a target for chronic kidney disease since 1998 [30]. TGF-β1/Smad3 signalling has been suggested as the main molecular mechanism in renal fibrosis due to several studies with various models [31]. However, targeting TGF-β in renal disease has proved difficult [32]. Alternative therapies, particularly those using drugs already licensed for use are attractive options.
CCN2 is a modular matricellular protein that acts downstream of TGFβ1 [33]. We observed a clear and significant increase in CCN2 mediated by SGLT2 when cells were exposed to a combination of TGF-β1 and elevated glucose (25 mM) for 24 h. SGLT2 involvement was deduced from the experiment using dapagliflozin. There is a discrepancy in the effect of dapagliflozin between protein and mRNA, 0.1 nM only significantly inhibited protein expression. We would postulate that this is due to the fact that CCN2 is an early immediate gene with transient RNA expression and the lowest concentration of dapagliflozin used by us flattens the curve but does not result in a significant effect at 24 h.
Work from ourselves and others have previously shown that TGF- β1 is able to induce CCN2 on its own, after 12–24 h in primary PTECs and other cell types only when the concentration is 5 ng/ml or higher [22,34]. This concentration of TGF-β1 also induces epithelial–mesenchymal transition (EMT) in breast cancer cells and renal PTEC [35,36]. There are no published reports of PTEC EMT in human DKD. In the present study, we did not observe any loss of phenotype after the cells were subjected to a combination of a lower concentration of TGF-β1 in the presence of hyperglycaemia, suggesting PTECs retained their epithelial phenotype at the time of CCN2 production and secretion. The effects we observed were dependent on both glucose concentration and TGF-β1, which provides a possible reason why DKD only occurs in a minority of patients with diabetes and strengthens the argument that fibrosis may depend on a two-hit model. In contrast, a research group recently found that high glucose (25 mM) treatment alone was sufficient enough to induce a significant accumulation of fibronectin and collagen IV protein, commonly observed during tubulointerstitial fibrosis [37]. However, it is worth noting that they did not use a primary cell line from multiple donors but instead utilised a transformed HK-2 cell line which is less archetypal of the in vivo situation. In addition, Wu and Derynk [38] previously published a glucose induced Smad3 C terminal phosphorylation, not observed in the work presented above. This may also be due to the difference in the cell model as they utilised murine cells grown on plastic culture dishes.
We found that hyperglycaemia alone and in combination with TGFβ1 increased phosphorylated ERK, consistent with findings from Fujita et al. Their results also showed that LLC-PK1 proximal tubule cell hypertrophy induced by high glucose was subdued with the ERK inhibitor PD98059 [39]. A separate group found that ERK inhibition by both U0126 and PD98059 reduced the CCN2 expression and fibronectin accumulation that was originally up-regulated in hyperglycaemic vascular smooth muscle cells [40]. Hayashida et al. [41] also discovered that high glucose (20 mM) activated extracellular regulated signalling kinase (ERK) and, in the presence of TGF- β1, elicited a rise in α1(I) collagen promoter activity and gene expression. This glucose-stimulated increase in promoter activity was ameliorated by the MEK inhibitor PD98059. Our work demonstrates that glucose induced ERK phosphorylation is SGLT2 dependent. Interestingly, in a study of colon cancer cells Saito et al. found dapagliflozin administration increased the cellular content of phosphorylated ERK. However, the concentration used from this group was 0.25 μM [42]. The IC50 for dapagliflozin inhibition of SGLT2 is reported to be approximately 1 nM [43], and the authors concluded that the effect observed was likely to be independent of SGLT2 inhibition.
In our experiments the presence of 25mM glucose with TGFβ1 induced a cascade of signalling proteins and gene expression that was sensitive to SGLT2 inhibition. Glucose entry through SGLT2 is accompanied by equimolar sodium entry, hence increased glucose entry is accompanied by increased sodium entry. PTEC sodium levels are closely controlled by a number of apical and basolateral sodium channels; SGLT is the only glucose channel in PTEC. Hence, it is unlikely that the effects observed by us are a result of raised intracellular sodium. Furthermore, glucose-induced ERK has been observed in cells that do not express sodium/glucose co-transport, as described above [41,44]. Never the less the effect of intracellular sodium on Smad signalling remains undefined and may merit enquiry.
Our results demonstrated TGF-β1, 0.75 ng/ml, significantly increased Smad3 linker phosphorylation in the presence of raised glucose. Results previously published by our group showed that TGF-β1 induced CCN2 secretion is dependent on Smad3 through the selective use of Smad3 small interfering RNA [45]. This suggests that the dapagliflozin sensitive ERK mediated phosphorylation of Smad3 Serine 204 may be the critical point of convergence of TGF-β1 and glucose in our experiments, however we have not yet demonstrated its direct involvement in the activation of CCN2. The Hayashida/Schnaper group reported that blocking ERK in renal mesangial cells also managed to inhibit both the phosphorylation of linker region serine 204 and Smad3 mediated collagen 1A2 promoter activation. The constructs they created that specifically lacked serine 204 also reduced Smad3 α2(I) collagen promoter activity, further indicating a key role for it in the development of renal fibrosis [23]. In the same cells, TGF-β1 was able to phosphorylate the serine within the linker region of Smad3, and this was similarly reversed upon MEK inhibition [46]. Taken together these data strongly support the case that targeting SGLT2 could also inhibit the glucose-TGF-β1/ERK/Smad3 signalling cascade and subsequent key elements of renal fibrosis in our PTECs.
Interestingly, it appears from the results presented here that glucose alone and in combination with TGF-β1 causes phosphorylation of a truncated isoform (∼25kDa) of Smad3 which is dimerised with a full length Smad3 (∼50 kDa) phosphorylated at the SSXS domain. This would result in a product of approximately 75kDa, as observed on our cellular phospho-Smad3 and cellular phospho-serine 204 blots in Figure 3. We have not yet fully characterised the structure of this isoform and this 25 kDa band is not consistent with current reports in literature, which usually indicate a full length ∼50 kDa size. It was only detectable by antibodies targeting between amino acids 200 and 432, suggesting that this truncated form lacks the MH1 domain. Typically, the N-terminal MH1 domain of Smad3 is responsible for DNA binding via the CAGAC Smad-binding element (SBE) [47]. However, another type of DNA sequence identified as a Smad-binding motif are G/C rich regions. There is evidence in literature that Smad3 is also able to bind to these GC motifs that lack CAGAC sequences [48]. Smad3 forms homo and hetero trimers, with Smad4. Thus we hypothesise that our particular model involves full-sized receptor phosphorylated Smad3 binding with the truncated Smad3 (that lacks the MH1 domain) and forming a heterotrimer with Smad4 before translocating to the nucleus to regulate gene transcription. This ‘R-Smads heterotrimer’ model was previously depicted by Macias et al [49]. We propose a novel TGFβ/Smad3 signalling pathway where a dimer consisting of a full length Smad3 and a truncated form is phosphorylated on the former at the C-terminal SSXS at receptor level and later by ERK on the linker region. This proposed pathway merits further investigation.
In summary, we have identified a mechanism for an SGLT2 mediated fibrogenic pathway in a diabetic milieu and a cellular signalling cascade mediating the pro-fibrotic effect. We propose that high glucose acts on or via SGLT2 to activate MEK/ERK signalling while TGF-β1 is simultaneously activating its own receptor. These two events converge on different phosphorylation sites on Smad3 leading to up-regulation of pro-fibrotic protein CCN2. Our results provide molecular basis for improvements in renal outcomes demonstrated in patients treated with an SGLT2 inhibitor. Inhibition of SGLT2 may provide a novel therapeutic approach for the treatment of DKD by limiting tubular interstitial fibrosis.
Supplementary Material
Abbreviations
- cDNA
complementary DNA
- DKD
diabetic kidney disease
- DMEM
Dulbecco’s modified eagle medium
- ERK
extracellular regulated kinase
- FBS
foetal bovine serum
- GAPDH
glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH)
- GT
glutamyl transferase
- HRP
horseradish peroxidase
- LR
linker region
- PTEC
proximal tubule epithelial cell
- qPCR
quantitative polymerase chain reaction
- RT-PCR
reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction
- SGLT2
sodium glucose cotransporter 2
- TBST
Tris-buffered saline tween
- TGF-β1
transforming growth factor beta 1
Data Availability
The datasets/resources generated during and/or analysed for the current study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
Competing Interests
The authors declare that there are no competing interests associated with the manuscript.
Funding
This project is jointly funded by Kidney Research UK [grant number ST_008_20151127] and the South West Thames Kidney Fund [grant number TKF PhD2017].
CRediT Author Contribution
Xinlu Pan: Investigation, Writing—original draft. Mysore K. Phanish: Formal analysis, Writing—review and editing. Deborah L. Baines: Project administration, Writing—review and editing. Mark E.C. Dockrell: Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Funding acquisition, Project administration, Supervision, Writing—review & editing.
Ethics Approval and Consent to Participate
Ethical approval for isolating human PTECs from nephrectomy specimen was obtained from the Merton and Sutton local research ethics committee.
References
- 1.D'Marco L., Puchades M.J., Romero-Parra M. and Gorriz J.L. (2020) Diabetic kidney disease and COVID-19: the crash of two pandemics. Front. Med. 7, 6–8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Alicic R.Z., Rooney M.T. and Tuttle K.R. (2017) Diabetic kidney disease: challenges, progress, and possibilities. Clin. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 12, 2032–2045 10.2215/CJN.11491116 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Tonolo G. and Cherchi S. (2014) Tubulointerstitial disease in diabetic nephropathy. Int. J. Nephrol. Renovasc. Dis. 7, 107–115 10.2147/IJNRD.S37883 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Tang S.C.W. and Lai K.N. (2012) The pathogenic role of the renal proximal tubular cell in diabetic nephropathy. Nephrol. Dial. Transplant. 27, 3049–3056 10.1093/ndt/gfs260 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Jeon Y.K., Kim M.R., Huh J.E., Mok J.Y., Song S.H., Kim S.S.et al. (2011) Cystatin C as an early biomarker of nephropathy in patients with type 2 diabetes. J. Korean Med. Sci. 26, 258–263 10.3346/jkms.2011.26.2.258 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Sabbisetti V.S., Waikar S.S., Antoine D.J., Smiles A., Wang C., Ravisankar A.et al. (2014) Blood kidney injury molecule-1 is a biomarker of acute and chronic kidney injury and predicts progression to ESRD in type I diabetes. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 25, 2177–2186 10.1681/ASN.2013070758 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Lee D.M., Battson M.L., Jarrell D.K., Hou S., Ecton K.E., Weir T.L.et al. (2018) SGLT2 inhibition via dapagliflozin improves generalized vascular dysfunction and alters the gut microbiota in type 2 diabetic mice. Cardiovasc. Diabetol. 17, 1–14 10.1186/s12933-018-0708-x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Hsia D.S., Grove O. and Cefalu W.T. (2017) An update on SGLT2 inhibitors for the treatment of diabetes mellitus. Curr. Opin. Endocrinol. Diab. Obes. 24, 73–79 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Kalra S., Singh V. and Nagrale D. (2016) Sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibition and the glomerulus: a review. Adv. Ther. 33, 1502–1518 10.1007/s12325-016-0379-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Santer R. and Calado J. (2010) Familial renal glucosuria and SGLT2: from a Mendelian trait to a therapeutic target. Clin. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 5, 133–141 10.2215/CJN.04010609 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Francis J., Zhang J., Farhi A., Carey H. and Geller D.S. (2004) A novel SGLT2 mutation in a patient with autosomal recessive renal glucosuria. Nephrol. Dial. Transplant. 19, 2893–2895 10.1093/ndt/gfh426 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Kleta R., Stuart C., Gill F.A. and Gahl W.A. (2004) Renal glucosuria due to SGLT2 mutations. Mol. Genet. Metab. 82, 56–58, [cited 2018 May 20] Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15110322 10.1016/j.ymgme.2004.01.018 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Hummel C.S., Lu C., Liu J., Ghezzi C., Hirayama B.A., Loo D.D.F.et al. (2012) Structural selectivity of human SGLT inhibitors. Am. J. Physiol. - Cell Physiol. 302, 373–382 10.1152/ajpcell.00328.2011 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Aroor A.R., Das N.A., Carpenter A.J., Habibi J., Jia G., Ramirez-Perez F.I.et al. (2018) Glycemic control by the SGLT2 inhibitor empagliflozin decreases aortic stiffness, renal resistivity index and kidney injury. Cardiovasc. Diabetol. 17, 1–14 10.1186/s12933-018-0750-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Diwakar R., Pearson A.L., Colville-Nash P., Brunskill N.J. and Dockrell M.E.C. (2007) The role played by endocytosis in albumin-induced secretion of TGF-β1 by proximal tubular epithelial cells. Am. J. Physiol. - Ren. Physiol. 292, 1464–1470 10.1152/ajprenal.00069.2006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Zorena K., Malinowska E., Raczyńska D., Myśliwiec M. and Raczyńska K. (2013) Serum concentrations of transforming growth factor-beta 1 in predicting the occurrence of diabetic retinopathy in juvenile patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus. J. Diabetes Res. 2013, 10.1155/2013/614908 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Mason R.M. (2009) Connective tissue growth factor(CCN2), a pathogenic factor in diabetic nephropathy. What does it do? How does it do it? J. Cell Commun. Signal 3, 95–104 10.1007/s12079-009-0038-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Seher A., Nicke J., Mueller T.D., Kneitz S., Gebhardt S., ter Vehn T.M.et al. (2011) Gene expression profiling of connective tissue growth factor (CTGF) stimulated primary human tenon fibroblasts reveals an inflammatory and wound healing response in vitro. Mol. Vis. 17, 53–62 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Adler S.G., Schwartz S., Williams M.E., Arauz-Pacheco C., Bolton W.K., Lee T.et al. (2010) Phase 1 study of anti-CTGF monoclonal antibody in patients with diabetes and microalbuminuria. Clin. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 5, 1420–1428 10.2215/CJN.09321209 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Gilbert R.E., Akdeniz A., Weitz S., Usinger W.R., Molineaux C., Jones S.et al. (2003) Excretion in patients with type 1 diabetes and nephropathy. Diabetes Care. 26, 10.2337/diacare.26.9.2632 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Picot J. (2004) Human cell culture protocols. Human Cell Culture Protocols. Human Cell Culture Protocols (2nd edn).Picot (ed.) J., pp. 359. Humana Press, Totowa, NJ, 1-588-29-222-3. [Google Scholar]
- 22.Phanish M.K., Wahab N.A., Hendry B.M. and Dockrell M.E.C. (2005) TGF-beta1-induced connective tissue growth factor (CCN2) expression in human renal proximal tubule epithelial cells requires Ras/MEK/ERK and Smad signalling. Nephron Exp. Nephrol. 100, e156–65 10.1159/000085445 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Browne J.A., Liu X., Schnaper H.W. and Hayashida T. (2013) Serine-204 in the linker region of Smad3 mediates the collagen-I response to TGF-β in a cell phenotype-specific manner. Exp. Cell Res. 319, 2928–2937 10.1016/j.yexcr.2013.07.013 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Butkowski R.J., Wieslander J., Kleppel M., Michael A.F. and Fish A.J. (1989) Basement membrane collagen in the kidney: Regional localization of novel chains related to collagen IV. Kidney Int. 35, 1195–1202 10.1038/ki.1989.110 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Wiviott S.D., Raz I., Bonaca M.P., Mosenzon O., Kato E.T., Cahn A.et al. (2019) Dapagliflozin and cardiovascular outcomes in type 2 diabetes. N. Engl. J. Med. 380, 347–357 10.1056/NEJMoa1812389 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.De Muro P., Faedda R., Fresu P., Masala A., Cigni A., Concas G.et al. (2004) Urinary transforming growth factor-β1 in various types of nephropathy. Pharmacol. Res. 49, 293–298 10.1016/j.phrs.2003.10.003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Biernacka A., Dobaczewski M. and Frangogiannis N.G. (2011) TGF-β signaling in fibrosis. Growth Factors 29, 196–202 10.3109/08977194.2011.595714 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Leask A. and Abraham D.J. (2006) All in the CCN family: essential matricellular signaling modulators emerge from the bunker. J. Cell Sci. 119, 4803–4810 10.1242/jcs.03270 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Lan H.Y. (2011) Diverse roles of TGF-β/Smads in renal fibrosis and inflammation. Int. J. Biol. Sci. 7, 1056–1067 10.7150/ijbs.7.1056 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Border W.A. and Noble N.A. (1998) Evidence that TGF-β should be a therapeutic target in diabetic nephropathy. Kidney Int. 54, 1390–1391 10.1046/j.1523-1755.1998.00127.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Feng M., Tang P.M.K., Huang X.R., Sun S.F., You Y.K., Xiao J.et al. (2018) TGF-β mediates renal fibrosis via the Smad3-Erbb4-IR long noncoding RNA axis. Mol. Ther. 26, 148–161 10.1016/j.ymthe.2017.09.024 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Yanagita M. (2012) Inhibitors/antagonists of TGF-β system in kidney fibrosis. Nephrol. Dial. Transplant. 27, 3686–3691 10.1093/ndt/gfs381 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Phanish M.K., Winn S.K. and Dockrell M.E.C. (2010) Connective tissue growth factor-(CTGF, CCN2) - A marker, mediator and therapeutic target for renal fibrosis. Nephron. - Exp. Nephrol. 114, 83–92 10.1159/000262316 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Cheng J.C., Chang H.M., Fang L., Sun Y.P. and Leung P.C.K. (2015) TGF-β1 up-regulates connective tissue growth factor expression in human granulosa cells through Smad and ERK1/2 signaling pathways. PLoS One 10, 1–14 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Tian M. and Schiemann W.P. (2017) TGF-β stimulation of EMT programs elicits non-genomic ER-α activity and anti-estrogen resistance in breast cancer cells. J. Cancer Metastasis. Treat. 3, 150 10.20517/2394-4722.2017.38 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Ming He W., Qi Yin J., dong Cheng X., Lu X., Ni L., Xi Y.et al. (2018) Oleanolic acid attenuates TGF-β1-induced epithelial-mesenchymal transition in NRK-52E cells. BMC Complement. Altern. Med. 18, 1–8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Lee W.C., Chau Y.Y., Ng H.Y., Chen C.H., Wang P.W., Liou C.W.et al. (2019) Empagliflozin protects HK-2 cells from high glucose-mediated injuries via a mitochondrial mechanism. Cells 8, 1085 10.3390/cells8091085 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Wu L. and Derynck R. (2009) Essential role of TGF-β signaling in glucose-induced cell hypertrophy. Dev. Cell 17, 35–48 10.1016/j.devcel.2009.05.010 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Fujita H., Omori S., Ishikura K., Hida M. and Awazu M. (2004) ERK and p38 mediate high-glucose-induced hypertrophy and TGF-β expression in renal tubular cells. Am. J. Physiol. - Ren. Physiol. 286, 120–126 10.1152/ajprenal.00351.2002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Ha Y.M., Lee D.H., Kim M. and Kang Y.J. (2013) High glucose induces connective tissue growth factor expression and extracellular matrix accumulation in rat aorta vascular smooth muscle cells via extracellular signal-regulated kinase 1/2. Korean. J. Physiol. Pharmacol. 17, 307–314 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Hayashida T. and Schnaper H.W. (2004) High ambient glucose enhances sensitivity to TGF-β1 via extracellular signal-regulated kinase and protein kinase Cδ activities in human mesangial cells. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 15, 2032–2041 10.1097/01.ASN.0000133198.74973.60 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Saito T., Okada S., Yamada E., Shimoda Y., Osaki A., Tagaya Y.et al. (2015) Effect of dapagliflozin on colon cancer cell. Endocr. J. 62, 1133–1137 10.1507/endocrj.EJ15-0396 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Kanwal A., Singh S.P., Grover P. and Banerjee S.K. (2012) Development of a cell-based nonradioactive glucose uptake assay system for SGLT1 and SGLT2. Anal. Biochem. 429, 70–75 10.1016/j.ab.2012.07.003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Lin H.H., Lee T.Y., Liu T.W. and Tseng C.P. (2017) High glucose enhances cAMP level and extracellular signal-regulated kinase phosphorylation in Chinese hamster ovary cell: Usage of Br-cAMP in foreign protein β-galactosidase expression. J. Biosci. Bioeng. 124, 108–114 10.1016/j.jbiosc.2017.02.010 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Phanish M.K., Wahab N.A., Colville-Nash P., Hendry B.M. and Dockrell M.E.C. (2006) The differential role of Smad2 and Smad3 in the regulation of pro-fibrotic TGFbeta1 responses in human proximal-tubule epithelial cells. Biochem. J. 393, 601–607 10.1042/BJ20051106 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Hayashida T., Decaestecker M. and Schnaper H.W. (2003) Cross-talk between ERK MAP kinase and Smad signaling pathways enhances TGF-beta-dependent responses in human mesangial cells. FASEB J. 17, 1576–1578 10.1096/fj.03-0037fje [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Kusanagi K., Inoue H., Ishidou Y., Mishima H.K., Kawabata M. and Miyazono K. (2000) Characterization of a bone morphogenetic protein-responsive Smad- binding element. Mol. Biol. Cell 11, 555–565 10.1091/mbc.11.2.555 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Martin-Malpartida P., Batet M., Kaczmarska Z., Freier R., Gomes T., Aragón E.et al. (2017) Structural basis for genome wide recognition of 5-bp GC motifs by SMAD transcription factors. Nat. Commun. 8, 1–15 10.1038/s41467-017-02054-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Macias M.J., Martin-Malpartida P. and Massagué J. (2015) Structural determinants of Smad function in TGF-β signaling. Trends Biochem. Sci. 40, 296–308 10.1016/j.tibs.2015.03.012 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
The datasets/resources generated during and/or analysed for the current study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.