Abstract
The present research aims to evaluate the impact of industrial processes and anthropogenic activities on the beetle Pimelia latreillei inhabiting the polluted site at Zawya Abd El- Qader, Alexandria, Egypt. Beetles were collected from the vicinity of five factories. The genotoxic effects of environmental exposures to industrial heavy metals were monitored using a broad range of assays, including energy-dispersive X ray microanalysis and X-ray diffraction (SEM and EDX)), qRT-PCR gene expression assay, micronuclei formation, and transmission electron microscope (TEM). Energy dispersive X-ray microanalysis for the soil and testicular tissues of beetles collected from the polluted site revealed a higher percentage of heavy metals than the beetles collected from the reference site (Sidi Kirier, Alexandria, Egypt). To analyze/monitor genotoxicity in P. latreillei sampled from the polluted site, the transcription levels of levels of heat shock proteins (Hsps) and accessory gland seminal fluid protein (AcPC01) in testicular tissues were recorded. The incidence of micronuclei (MN) formation in the testicular cells was also observed. Quantitative RT-PCR (RT-qPCR) analysis was carried out to detect the changes in the gene expression of the aforementioned proteins. Genes encoding heat shock proteins (Hsp60, Hsp70, and Hsp90) were significantly overexpressed (> 2-fold) in specimens sampled from the polluted site; however, AcPC01 gene expression was under-expressed (<1.5-folds). The incidence of MN was significantly increased in specimens sampled from the polluted site. Ultrastructure anomalies (nuclear and cytoplasmic disruption) were also observed in the testicular cells of the beetles sampled from the polluted site compared to those sampled from the unpolluted site. Our results, therefore, advocate a need for adequate measures to reduce increasing environmental pollution in the urban-industrial areas.
1. Introduction
Heavy metals released from industrial processes and anthropogenic activities have an adverse effect on humans and the ecosystem [1, 2]. The World Health Organization (WHO) estimated that a million people died every year from diseases caused by pollution, most of them in developing countries [3, 4]. Inorganic pollutants released from industrial and agricultural sources contain heavy metals that result in soil pollution [5, 6]. The excess release of heavy metals into the soil makes them a major health concern worldwide [7, 8]. Most heavy metals have carcinogenic and/or mutagenic effects in addition to their cytotoxicity to healthy cells at low concentrations [9, 10].
As metal ions traverse cell barriers, the balance of extracellular and intercellular ions is interrupted, which affects membrane permeability [11]. Therefore, insects, including ground beetles have been used as bioindicators to monitor environmental pollution and in particular, soil pollution by heavy metals [12–15]. Ground beetles inhabit most of the biogeographical regions and are simply sampled from their habitats, and their bionomics and systematics are well studied [16]. Disturbance in the physiological mechanisms of the organisms is a reflection of environmental stress (Migula et al. 2004). Biochemical analysis is progressively used in ecotoxicological studies to monitor the ubiquity of xenobiotics [17]. Biochemical alterations have been attributed to the negative effects resulting from vulnerability to a contaminant [18]. A molecular biomarker is a significant tool for the evaluation of ecotoxicity in living organisms. Toxic compounds have a high affinity for electron pairs found in the amino acids [19]. Hence, elevation or inhibition in the activity of the enzymes is an indication of the damage caused by pollutants [20].
Genotoxic agents can induce several health disorders, such as structural abnormalities and growth retardation [21]. Consequently, there is a need for sensitive tests to monitor the genotoxicity of hazardous compounds found in the environment [22].
The physiological response of an organism exposed to a stressor triggers the synthesis of specific proteins to repair possible damage caused by such exposure. These proteins are named molecular chaperones or heat shock proteins (Hsps) [23, 24]. They have a role in protecting the stressed cells [25]. Hsp60, Hsp70, and Hsp90 are the highly conservative proteins and the most susceptible to stress factors in the organism’s cells (Cui et al. 2010; Sun et al. 2014). In insects, the exposure to stressors leads to a decrease in the rate of synthesis of most proteins, but Hsp expression increases [26, 27]. Several studies have implicated heat shock proteins (Hsps) in evaluating the toxic potential of different stressors in insects, particularly of heavy metals [26, 28].
In insects, seminal fluid proteins (SFPs) are produced by the accessory glands (AGs), vesicula seminalis, ejaculatory duct, ejaculatory bulb, and testes. The SFPs include protease inhibitors, lectins, prohormones, peptides, and protective proteins, such as anti-oxidants present in the ejaculate of all eukaryotes [29]. During mating, they are conveyed to the females, thereby inducing female post-mating responses. Changes in the levels of these proteins affect the reproductive success of both sexes [29, 30].
Micronuclei (MNs) are biomarkers used to monitor genotoxicity [31]. They are tiny cytoplasmic extrusion of chromatin that results from the breakage of the chromosomes during cell division or chromosomal delay in anaphase [32]. Very few studies have been conducted to evaluate genotoxic damage by different stressors using MN assay [33].
The ultrastructure of the internal organs of insects is a competent tool in determining the effect of toxins. The bioaccumulation of heavy metals into insects can be used as a monitor for environmental pollution. Insects possess special structures, spherites for accumulating trace metals [34]. Accumulation of heavy metals in insect organs influences cell viability and induces cellular damage, as well as cell apoptosis [14, 35–37]. Heavy metals may affect the regulation and control mechanisms of the reproductive process, leading to spermatogenetic alterations, which, in turn, can result in the production of damaged spermatozoa [38–40]. Ultrastructure anomalies in insects’ testes induced by heavy metal pollution have been reported in a few studies [14, 35, 37].
Using a biomonitoring beetle, Pimelia latreillei, this study clarified the genotoxic effect of heavy metals originating from anthropogenic sources and industrial effluents. We also observed the ultrastructure damages to the testicular cells, which may be caused by heavy-metal pollution.
2. Materials and methods
2.1. Ethics statement
The ethical rules for animal regulations were followed and approved by Faculty of Science, Alexandria University committee in March 2018 (Alex-01-2018). All animal procedures were conducted in accordance with the local Guiding Principles for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals as adopted and promulgated by Alexandria University.
2.2. Study sites
Two sites were chosen for sampling the coleopteran insects. The sample locations were in public areas. Site A at Sidi Kirier, north coast of Alexandria, Egypt (latitude 31.016250°N and longitude 29.635663°E), was considered the reference site. Some ornamental plants, grasses, and shrubs were cultivated at this site. Site B at Zawya Abd El-Qader, southwest Alexandria, Egypt (latitudes 30° 33’ - 31° 30’ N and longitudes 29° 50’ - 30° 45’ E), was considered as the polluted site. This area covered a vast cultivated land representing most Abis and El-Nahada farms. These lands were subjected to aerosol deposition from various industrial activities located in the western part of Alexandria city [Site B1, Egyptian Petrochemicals Company or EPC (latitude 31.009206°N and 29.848589°E; Site B2, Alexandria Carbon Black (latitude 30.995080°N and longitude 29.848739°E); Site B3, Pirelli Tires Company (latitude 30.997497°N and longitude 29.846674°E); Site B4, Sidi Krier Petrochemical Company or Sidpec (latitude 31.004389°N and longitude 29.839531°E); and Site 5, Egyptian Ethylene Company or Ethydco (latitude 31.011130°N and longitude 29.832288°E)]. From meteorological data, the wind direction was found to be northwest (average speed between 2.75 m/s and 7.14 m/s), which might accelerate the delivery of contaminants over a long distance.
2.3. Sampling procedure
Live specimens of P. latreillei were collected randomly from ten sampling areas (1 m2 each) at each site in June 2018. Simultaneously with the beetle collection, soil samples were collected at a depth of 25 cm below the surface from the mentioned sites. The ten areas at Zawya Abd El Qader (the polluted site) were selected near the aforementioned companies (two areas around each company). The mean air temperature in June ranged from 28°C to 36°C and the mean relative humidity was 65%, with nearly no differences between the two sites. About 200 insects were collected from each site. The specimens were sexed, and about 90 males were preserved alive in local soil and plants in glass containers until processing. Beetles were anaesthetized with absolute ethanol (95%), then dissected under a dissecting microscope in a drop of Ringer’s physiological solution. The abdominal cavity was opened and the testes were extracted.
2.4. Studied insect
The specimens were identified at the Faculty of Agriculture, Alexandria University (Department of Entomology) as Pimelia latreillei. The studied insect belonged to Tenebrionid beetles.
2.5. Determination of heavy metals in the soil and testicular tissues of P. latreillei
Energy-dispersive X-ray microanalysis (EDX) was used to determine the percentages of different metals in the sieved soil and testicular tissues. This analysis was applied using a JEOL (JSM-5300) scanning microscope at the Electron Microscope Unit (E.M.), Faculty of Science, Alexandria University, Egypt. The accuracy of the analytical results was determined using eight samples of soil from each site and testicular tissues obtained from eight male beetles.
The identity of each peak was assigned automatically by the SEM EDX software. Line intensity was measured for each element in the sample and for the same elements in calibration standards of known composition. At X500, a stationary spot was analyzed at random for 110 s.
2.6. mRNA expression of heat shock proteins (Hsps) and seminal fluid (AcPC01) encoding genes
2.6.1. Isolation of total RNA
Total RNA was isolated from eight samples of testicular tissues and accessory glands of male P. latreillei with TRIzol® Reagent (Invitrogen, Germany). To ensure DNA digestion, 1 U of RQ1 RNAse-free DNAse (Invitrogen, Germany) was added to the RNA, and the mixture was re-suspended in DEPC-treated water. Total RNA purity was assessed by the 260/280 nm ratio (between 1.8 and 2.1). To ensure integrity, ethidium bromide stain analysis of 28S and 18S bands by formaldehyde-containing agarose gel electrophoresis was performed. Aliquots were used for reverse transcription (RT).
2.6.2. Reverse transcription (RT) reaction
Poly (A) + RNA isolated from testicular tissues and accessory glands of P. latreillei was reverse transcribed into cDNA in a total volume of 20 μl using Revert AidTM First Strand cDNA Synthesis Kit (MBI Fermentas, Germany). From the total RNA, 5 μg was used with a master mix (MM) consisting of 50 mM MgCl2, 5x reverse transcription (RT) buffer (50 mM KCl; 10 mM Tris-HCl; pH 8.3), 10 mM of dNTP, 50 μM oligo-dT primer, 20 U ribonuclease inhibitor (50 kDa recombinant enzyme to inhibit RNase activity), and 50 UM- MuLV reverse transcriptase. Each sample mixture was centrifuged for 30 s at 1000 g. The mixture was then transferred to the thermo-cycler (Biometra GmbH, Göttingen, Germany). The RT reaction started at 25°C for 10 min, continued at 42°C for 1 h, and was stopped after heating at 99°C for 5 min, followed by cooling in an ice chamber.
2.6.3. Real Time-Polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR)
Step One™ Real-Time PCR System from Biosystems (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) was used to determine the beetles’ cDNA copy number. PCR reactions were set up in 25 ml reaction mixtures containing 12.5 ml 1× SYBR® Premix Ex TaqTM (TaKaRa, Biotech. Co. Ltd.), 0.5 ml 0.2 mM sense primer, 0.5 ml 0.2 mM antisense primer, 6.5 ml distilled water, and 5 ml of cDNA template.
The reaction program was divided into 3 steps. Step (1) was at 95.0°C for 3 min. Step (2) consisted of 40 cycles in which each cycle was subdivided into 3 steps: (a) at 95.0°C for 15 s; (b) at 55.0°C for 30 s; and (c) at 72.0°C for 30 s. Step (3) consisted of 71 cycles which started at 60.0°C and then increased about 0.5°C every 10 s up to 95.0°C. Primer quality was measured using melting curve analysis that was executed at the end of each RT-qPCR (Fig 1). Each experiment included a distilled water negative control. The sequences of the specific primer of the genes used in accordance with Liu et al. (2014) [41], Rodríguez-García et al. (2015) [42], and Cai et al. (2017) [43], are listed in Table 1. The relative quantification of the target to the reference was determined using the 2−ΔΔCT methods.
Table 1. Primers sequence used for RT-qPCR.
Gene name | Primer sequense (5′-3′) | GenBank accession No., Full-length cDNA library, & Amplicon size | References |
---|---|---|---|
Hsp60 | F: GCT GTA TGT CCG CCG TGT A | Genbank acc. n.: KU323593 Amplicon size: 427 bp |
Cai et al. (2017) [43] |
R: GGG AGT CTT CGT GAA TGC C | |||
Hsp70 | F: TGG CGG CAA ACC GAA GAT | Genbank acc. n.: KU159184 Amplicon size: 576 bp |
|
R: CGC TGG CAC CGT AAT GAC | |||
Hsp90 | F: GAG GAA GGT ATT GTA GCA GG | Genbank acc. n.: KU159185 Amplicon size: 313 bp |
|
R: AGC GGT CGT CAA GAG GGA TG | |||
AcPC01 | F: GTA TTC CAT TGT GTC CAC CAC CTC CGG | Genbank acc. n.: KP164546.1 Amplicon size:128bp |
Liu et al. (2014) [41] |
R: TGG TGG ACA AGG TGG ACA ACA TGG AAC | |||
β-actin | F: CTC TGC TAT GTA GCC CTT GAC TT | Genbank acc. n.: KU884974.1 Amplicon size: 156 bp |
Rodríguez-García et al. (2015) [42] |
R: GCA GTT GTA GGT GGT TTC GTG |
Hsp60: heat shock protein 60 encoding gene, Hsp70: heat shock protein 70 encoding gene, Hsp90: heat shock protein 90 encoding gene, AcPC01: accessory gland seminal fluid protein encoding gene, β-actin: Beta actin encoding gene.
2.7. Micronucleus (MN) test
Samples of beetle testes were prepared for MN analysis. The testes were immersed in saline solution (128.3 mM NaCl, 16.7 mM Na2HPO4, 19.9 mM KH2PO4), incubated in tap water as a hypotonic treatment for 50 min to let the cells swell, allowing the mononuclear and binuclear to separate. 3 μg/ml of cytochalasin B was used to block cytokinesis. Testis was spread on coded slides, fixed in Water: Ethanol: Acetic Acid by vol (4:3:3) for 20 min, Ethanol: Acetic Acid,1:1(v/v) for 30 min, and Acetic Acid (100%) for 24 h, air dried, stained with Giemsa dye 1M diluted in 30 M buffer (0.06M sodium citrate buffer, pH: 6.8) for 10 min. About 1000 testicular cells were scored for each slide under a light microscope at a magnification of 1000× to determine the frequency of MN [33, 44]. Other nuclear abnormalities were also noticed in the cells, including nuclear buds, karyorrhexis, karyolysis, binucleated cells, and heterochromatin [45, 46].
2.7.1. Micronuclei identification
Micronuclei (MN) are illustrated in Fig 2 according to the following criteria: (1) the structure and staining of MN must be similar to the main nuclei; (2) MN are not connected to the main nuclei, but they may touch the main nuclei; (3) MN should have spherical structures; (4) MN diameter should not be greater than 1/3 core diameter.
2.8. Preparation of testes for ultrastructure analysis
Testes were fixed immediately in 4% formaldehyde and 1% glutaraldehyde (4F1G) in 0.1 M phosphate buffer solution (pH 7.2) at 4°C for 3 h, followed by post-fixation with 2% osmium tetroxide (OsO4) in the same buffer for 2 h. A buffer was used to wash the samples, which were dehydrated at 4°C through a graded series of ethanol, then embedded in Epon-Araldite mixture in labeled beam capsules. Ultrathin sections (0.06–0.07 μm thick) were cut from the testes for examination under a transmission electron microscope (TEM). The ultra-thin sections were placed on 200 mesh copper grids, which were double-stained with uranyl acetate for 30 min and lead citrate for 20–30 min (Reynolds 1963). Electron micrographs were taken at several magnifications. Scoping and photographing the grids were achieved by JEOL 100 CX TEM, at Electron Microscope Unit, Faculty of Science, Alexandria University, Egypt.
2.9. Data analysis
Data analysis was performed using the IBM SPSS software package version 20.0 (Armonk, NY: IBM Corp) [47]. The Shapiro‒Wilk test was used to verify the normality of the distribution of variables. Data were analyzed by a Student’s t-test (Sokal and Rohlf 1981) to determine the difference between the two studied sites for normally distributed quantitative variables. The significance of the obtained results was judged at p ≤ 0.05.
3. Results
3.1. X-ray analysis of soil samples and testicular tissues of P. latreillei collected from the inspected sites
Trace metal percentages were obtained from the X-ray analysis of sieved soil and the testicular tissues of P. latreillei sampled from the inspected sites (Tables 2 and 3).
Table 2. Trace metal percentages (%) in sieved soil samples from reference and polluted sites (site A & B), n = 8.
Metal Site | Site A | Site B | P |
---|---|---|---|
Mg | 0.2 ± 0.07 | 1* ± 0.1 | <0.001 |
Ca | 5.4 ± 0.2 | 3.5* ± 0.3 | 0.006 |
K | 1.7 ± 0.3 | 2.6 ± 0.3 | 0.09 |
Na | 1.5 ± 0.6 | 16.9* ± 1.5 | <0.001 |
Zn | 0.3 ± 0.08 | 1.1* ± 0.07 | <0.001 |
Cu | 0.5 ± 0.1 | 2.4*± 0.4 | <0.001 |
Fe | 3 ± 0.4 | 8.2* ± 0.5 | <0.001 |
Al | 0.6 ± 0.2 | 4.1*± 1.3 | 0.022 |
Pb | ND | 1.4*± 0.06 | <0.001 |
Cd | ND | 14*± 0.1 | <0.001 |
Ti | 0.3± 0.1 | 1.9*± 0.2 | <0.001 |
Si | 21.7± 0.9 | 79*±3.1 | <0.001 |
For each metal, the percentage expressed by using minimum–maximum values and mean (n = 8) using Student t-test
*: Statistically significant at (p ≤ 0.05), ND: Not detected.
Table 3. Trace metal percentages (%) in testicular tissues of P. latreillei collected from the reference and polluted sites (site A & B), n = 8.
Metal Site | Site A | Site B | p |
---|---|---|---|
Ca | 3.5 ± 0.06 | 5.7* ± 0.4 | 0.01 |
K | 7.3 ± 0.2 | ND | 0.000 |
Na | 8.4 ± 0.2 | 13.7* ± 1.7 | 0.05 |
Zn | 4.2 ± 0.04 | 6.4* ± 0.5 | 0.02 |
Cu | 3.6 ± 0.2 | 18* ± 4.7 | 0.05 |
Fe | ND | 1.6* ± 0.1 | 0.002 |
Al | 5.4 ± 0.1 | 21* ± 4 | 0.03 |
Pb | ND | 3.4* ± 0.1 | 0.000 |
Cd | ND | 1.1* ±0.1 | 0.006 |
For each metal, the percentage expressed by using minimum–maximum values and mean (n = 8) using Student t-test
*: Statistically significant at (p ≤ 0.05), ND: Not detected.
Twelve elements, Mg, Ca, K, Na, Zn, Cu, Fe, Al, Pb, Cd, Ti, and Si, were detected in the soil from site B and ten elements from site A (Pb and Cd were absent). A significant elevation in the percentages of metals was reported at the site B compared with those at site A, except for K, with detection of Pb and Cd (Table 2). However, only six elements were present in the testicular tissues of P. latreillei sampled from site A (Ca, K, Na, Zn, Cu, and Al) and eight elements in the samples from site B (Ca, Na, Zn, Cu, Fe, Al, Pb, and Cd). A significant elevation in the percentages of Ca, Na, Zn, Cu, and Al was observed in the testicular tissue of beetles collected from the site B compared with those at site A, except for K (not detected), with detection of Fe, Pb, and Cd (Table 3).
3.2. Gene expression of Heat shock proteins (Hsp60, Hsp70, Hsp90) and seminal fluid protein (AcPC01) in testicular tissues and accessory glands of P. latreillei collected from the inspected sites
cDNA obtained from testicular tissues was used as the template for RT-qPCR, which was conducted to investigate the gene expression patterns of Hsp60, Hsp70, and Hsp90 in the testicular tissues of P. latreillei. The Hsp60 (GenBank Accession: KU323593, full-length cDNA library: 2143 bp, amplicon size: 427bp), Hsp70 (GenBank Accession: KU159184, full-length cDNA library: 1947 bp, amplicon size: 576bp), and Hsp90 (GenBank Accession: KU159185, full-length cDNA library: 2385 bp, amplicon size:313bp) transcripts were detected to be highly significant, being more than 2-fold in the testicular tissues of beetles collected from the polluted site in comparison with the expression observed in the testicular tissues of beetles collected from the reference site. In particular, relatively high mRNA expression levels of Hsp70 were observed in samples from the polluted site (Fig 3). However, a significant inhibition in AcPC01 (GenBank Accession: KP164546.1, full-length cDNA library: 20 bp, amplicon size: 5128 bp) transcript level, being less than 1.5-fold, was observed in the accessory glands of male P. latreillei collected from the polluted site, compared with that of the reference site (Fig 4A).
3.3. Micronucleus assay
The incidence of micronuclei in the testicular cells of P. latreillei due to the effect of heavy metals is presented in Fig 4B. Data are expressed as Mean ± SE of five replicates. Micronuclei frequency were expressed in 1000 analyzed testicular cells. The number of micro-nucleated cells among the polluted group was highly significant, being 30.6±1.72 compared with the micro-nucleated cell number in the control group (12.4±1.08).
3.4. Macroscopic observations
The male reproductive organs of P. latreillei consist of two testes, which are bulblike structures encased in a peritoneal sheath and composed of follicles, the calyx, the vas deferens, and the vesicula seminalis at each side combined into the ejaculatory duct and leading to the aedeagus. The ejaculate received two accessory glands. There were no external anatomical abnormalities recognized in the testes of beetles collected from the polluted site, compared to the reference group (Fig 4C).
3.5. Ultrastructure observations of the testis of P. latreillei collected from the inspected sites
The present results are the first describing the testicular structure of the studied beetle, P. latreillei. There are no previous studies that describe such a structure. Electron micrographs of the testis of P. latreillei sampled from the reference site (site A) showed euchromatic spermatogonia with a large spherical nucleus, one or two dense nucleoli, and a regular nuclear envelope. Their cytoplasm contained mitochondria distributed around the nucleus. Rough endoplasmic reticulum, Golgi complex, and free ribosomes were also observed (Fig 5A). The spermatocytes appeared with a larger nucleus and homogenous chromatin. The mitochondria redistributed on one side of the nucleus, preparing for nebenkern formation in the initial spermatids (Fig 5B). The initial spermatids were diagnosed by their small round nuclei with condensed chromatin and round nebenkern formed by the fusion of the mitochondria (Fig 5C). The interconnected bridges between the initial spermatids were noticed, as they arose from a single spermatocyte (Fig 5C).
Late spermatids had an oval nucleus, a centriole, and an axoneme. The nebenkern was divided into two mitochondrial derivatives, which extended posteriorly around the axoneme (Fig 5D), while spermatozoa had a more dimensional nucleus, a conical acrosome, and flagellum (Fig 5E). Cross-sections through the flagellum showed nine accessory tubules and nine doublet tubules surrounding two central tubules. Hence, the axoneme was seen as having a 9+9+2 tubular pattern (Fig 5F). Two accessory bodies were also noticed (Fig 5F).
The electron micrographs marked out parietal cells that form the germinal cyst borders. They are characterized by their large polymorphous nucleus with a few patches of chromatin near the nuclear envelope. Their cytoplasm contained mitochondria, free ribosomes, and rough endoplasmic reticulum (Fig 5G).
The electron micrographs of the testicular cells of the polluted group showed some anatomical anomalies. In spermatogonia, there were some nuclear deformations, such as indentation of the nuclear envelope and formation of globular inclusion bodies. Dense vesicles were noted in the cytoplasm (Fig 6A). The degenerative changes in the spermatocyte appeared more pronounced in the cytoplasm. These changes included lysis of mitochondrial matrices, the appearance of dense vesicles, and vacuolated cytoplasm. In the nucleus, some discrete patches of heterochromatin were observed (Fig 6B).
Early spermatids appeared with abnormal chromatin clumping (Fig 6C). Cytoplasmic deformities included vacuolations, nebenkern disintegration, dense vesicles, and convolution of the plasma membranes (Fig 6C). Many anomalies were noticeable in late spermatids, such as abnormal head morphology with aberrant chromatin and irregular nuclear envelope (Fig 6D–6F). Transverse sections through their flagella showed disintegrated mitochondrial derivatives, degenerated axonemes, vacuolated and residual cytoplasm, and convolution of plasma membranes (Fig 6E, 6G and 6H). Agglutinated spermatids (tail to tail), and spermatids with a double tail were also noticed (Fig 6G).
Variable deformities were also detected in the spermatozoa. Sperms failed to discard their residual cytoplasm (Fig 6H). Convolution of the plasma membrane and agglutinated sperms (head to tail and tail to tail) were frequently observed (Fig 6I).
The parietal cells were seen to be hypertrophied, with distended cytoplasm and vigorous phagocytic activity in malformed spermatozoa (Fig 6J). A dilated smooth endoplasmic reticulum was observed in the cytoplasm (Fig 6J).
4. Discussion
Employing insects in biomonitoring program is a functional ecological indication [12, 14, 15, 35, 37, 48, 49]. In the present study, the urban site is prone to industrial heavy metal pollution that might be released from the local factories. Therefore, agricultural soils are highly polluted with various heavy metals resulting from anthropogenic activities and industrial processes.
In this study, we used x-ray microprobe analysis to detect heavy-metal concentrations in the soil and insect testicular tissues. There was a significant elevation in heavy-metal percentages at the polluted site, particularly Cu, Zn, Al, Cd, and Pb compared with the control site. X-ray analysis is an effective tool for detecting trace metal in biological specimens [15, 50]. Our results align with previous studies that reported the toxic effect of heavy metals on aquatic and terrestrial insects collected from industrial areas [14, 37, 49–52]. Azam et al. (2015) [51] stated that the elevation in heavy metals percentages in animal bodies correlates site pollution.
RT-qPCR primers were used to amplify homologous sequences in the available coleopteran species [42, 43]. The three tested heat shock proteins (Hsps) showed highly significant transcript levels in response to heavy-metal pollution at site B compared with the reference site (site A). It was stated earlier by Qin et al. (2003) [53] that between 1.5 to 4-fold increase in the transcriptional activities of these molecular chaperones was found to be a significant induction. Dou et al. (2017) [54] and Cheng et al. (2018) [55] reported that Hsp60, Hsp70, and Hsp90 transcripts were expressed throughout insect development, suggesting a development regulatory role. Elevation in Hsp mRNA levels in insects due to heavy metal pollution was reported by Shu et al. (2011) [56] and Zhao et al. (2010) [57]. Induction of Hsp60, Hsp70, and Hsp90 protects against environmental stresses [41, 58, 59], although in our study Hsp mRNA levels were upregulated in the tested insect sampled from the polluted site, particularly Hsp70 gene. Hsp70 protein is the most dominant protein found in the early instars of insects and helps them to overcome adverse conditions [60]. Hsp70 protein may guard cells against metal-induced chromosome aberrations through different mechanisms that facilitate cell cycle regulation and reduce genomic instability [61]. It also stops the aggregation of the broken down proteins, leading to many serious injuries in the stressed cells [60]. Our results are in agreement with Doğanlar et al. (2014) [62], who exposed adult Drosophila melanogaster to different concentrations of metal mixture (Fe, Cu, Cd, and Pb). They reported that the expression of Hsp genes was altered by increasing the exposure time and that Hsp70 was the more expressed gene. Moreover, Braeckman et al. (1997a), Braeckman et al. (1997b), and Kafel et al. (2012) [63–65] observed an increase in the expression level of Hsp70 in Aedes albopictus and Spodoptera exigua exposed to cadmium. Joshi and Tiwari (2000) [66] noticed that environmental chemical pollutants, such as arsenate and mercury cause the induction of a common set of gene loci encoding heat shock proteins in the Australian sheep blowfly, Lucilia cuprina.
SFP analysis gives the perception of evolutionary patterns of reproductive traits [30]. Understanding reproductive molecules and their mechanisms provide opportunities to isolate species [67, 68].
SFPs have been described in several insect orders, such as honeybees (Hymenoptera), field crickets (Orthoptera), flies and mosquitoes (Diptera), moths and butterflies (Lepidoptera), and genus Tribolium (Coleoptera) [69–71]. To date, no other species of beetles have been analyzed for these proteins as markers for environmental pollution. Thus, P. latreillei is considered a model organism to evaluate the environmental impacts on the tested SFPs. In this study, a primer set was designed from the sequence of the tiger beetle’s AcPC01 protein available from Genbank [42].
Accessory glands of adult male insects are considered the main organs for producing the non-cellular portion of the sperm [72]. Secretory cells in the accessory gland produce accessory gland proteins (AcPs) that are transmitted to the female with sperms during mating [73]. In our study, a significant downregulation of AcPC01 was observed in males collected from the polluted site. Similarly [74], observed significant inhibition of AcP36DE expression in the accessory glands of male D. melanogaster treated with organophosphate compounds, dichlorvos and chlorpyrifos. They reported that the chemicals might either inhibit the regulation of AcPs or cause damage to the cells producing them.
The results obtained from MN in the testicular cells of insects collected from the polluted site indicated the intensity of DNA damage. The polluted site possessed significantly higher frequencies of MN than the reference site. The MN illustrate major damage to DNA that cannot be effectively repaired [75, 76]. Klobucar et al. (2003) [77] detected elevated MN frequencies in the hemocytes of caged mussels, Dreissena polymorpha, collected from four monitoring sites in river Drava, with different pollution intensities. They reported that MN formation stayed persistent in the cell until the end of its lifespan. Increased numbers of micronuclei indicate a mutagenic and carcinogenic effect in organisms [78, 79]. Offer et al. (2005) [80] stated that the incidence of micronuclei is attributable to the loss of chromosome segments assignable to chromosome breaks or chromosome exchanges. Hence, their formation is a sign of chromosome damage [81, 82]. The incidence of MN could also designate the level of organisms’ sensitivity to toxins [33, 83]. The MN test supported our findings of the nuclear deformities in the ultrastructure observations.
No pathological features were observed in the male reproductive system of P. latreillei, which represents the same structure as most of the ground beetles among the coleopteran insects. The testes appeared packed with germinal cysts [13, 14, 35].
Our electron micrographs illustrated sperm differentiation, starting from spermatogonia, which exhibited a round nucleus and nucleolus, and a cytoplasm packed with cytoplasmic organelles. Spermatocytes were seen to have a larger nucleus and aggregated mitochondria, preparing for nebenkern formation. There was chromatin condensation in spermatids and dimensioning in the head size through sperm maturation. Similar features were described previously by several researchers [13, 14, 35, 37, 84]. The sperms in P. latreillei are homologous to tenebrionid sperms. They consist of a conoid acrosome, slender nucleus, centriole, and flagellum with a 9+9+2 pattern. There are two similar mitochondrial derivatives and accessory bodies on each side of the axoneme [13, 35, 85].
At the polluted site, morphological changes in the nucleus and cytoplasm of testicular cells were noticed in most spermatogenic stages. These pathological signs are a consequence of DNA, protein damage, and dysfunction of membranes due to the action of heavy metals [15, 86, 87]. Heavy metals dramatically change the morphology of membranous organelles, such as the mitochondria, endoplasmic reticulum, and plasma and nuclear membranes [87]. Heavy metals sequester in the intracellular compartments of the nuclei and mitochondria, bind membrane and DNA associated proteins, thus altering membrane function as well as DNA repair mechanisms [86]. Metal-induced changes led to cell cycle arrest, cell death, mutation, and alteration in genomic dynamics.
We noticed some degeneration of the flagellar components of spermatids through spermiogenesis, such as axonemal and mitochondrial degeneration. Axonemal degeneration affects sperm motility, which is based on the movement of axonemal microtubules [88]. Mitochondrial degeneration leads to disruption of ATP supply, thus affecting sperm motility [87, 89, 90]. The presence of double tail spermatids was also observed in this study, which may be attributed to the persistence of cytoplasmic bridges that connect the cells throughout spermatogenesis [91]. Agglutinated spermatids and spermatozoa were obvious phenomena recognized in our preparations. This phenomenon results from the coating of antibodies to the sperms, driving them to clump together, and consequently reducing their motility [92].
The presence of dense vesicles and vacuoles in the cytoplasm was another pathological feature in our electron micrographs. High levels of heavy metals can be sequestered as dense vesicles of the lysosomal system [93]. Also, the continuous release of lysosomal hydrolase may result in vacuolated areas in the cytoplasm [94].
The function of the parietal cells in insects is similar to the function of Sertoli cells in mammals, which are being responsible for the nourishment of sperm and phagocytosis of the residual cytoplasm [35, 95]. Hence, the ultrastructure anomalies which were observed in these cells in the polluted group will affect sperm nourishment and lead to the presence of residual cytoplasm. Due the paucity of existing data, our studies have advanced our understanding of the effect of heavy metals on insect spermatogenesis [14, 35].
Finally, heavy metals sequester in particular compartments, such as the nucleus, mitochondria, and ER, which leads to cellular damage associated with changes in gene expression and DNA damage. Thus, P. latreillei is a good biomonitoring insect for evaluating heavy metal toxicity.
5. Conclusion
Humans benefit from ground beetles because they are active decomposers, recycling and removing feces. They also play a critical role as nutrient recyclers, returning organic matter to the soil via multitrophic interactions. Because they are long-lived and maintain a stable population, they are used in biomonitoring programs to monitor adverse environmental conditions. Genotoxic compounds are found in urban areas featuring industrial activities. Heavy metals are one of the possible genotoxic agents that may induce DNA and protein damage as well as ultrastructure anomalies in testicular cells. These aberrations can affect testicular functions. This study advocates a need for proper measures to be taken to lessen increasing environmental pollution in the urban industrial areas.
Acknowledgments
The authors are thankful to the Zoology Department and Electron microscope unit, Faculty of Science, Alexandria University.
Data Availability
All relevant data are within the paper.
Funding Statement
S.E. Start-up Research Grant Program provided by Foshan University, Foshan city, Guangdong province for distinguished researchers, Guangdong Science and Technology Plan Project (Grant No:1244 0600 4560 7389XC) and School of Life Science and Engineering fund (Grant No: KLPREAD201801-02). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
References
- 1.Serap S, Luff M. Ground beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae) as bioindicators of human impact. Munis Entomol Zool. 2010;5(1):209–15 [Google Scholar]
- 2.Hamed Y, T. S A, Elkiki M, Hassan M, Berndtsson R. Assessment of Heavy Metals Pollution and Microbial Contamination in Water, Sediments and Fish of Lake Manzala, Egypt. Life Sci. 2013;10:86–99 [Google Scholar]
- 3.World Health Organization (WHO). Burden of disease from Household Air Pollution for 2012. Geneva, Switzerland: WHO; 2014. [Google Scholar]
- 4.World Health Organization (WHO). 7 million deaths annually linked to air pollution. Geneva, Switzerland: WHO; 2014. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Morgan R. Soil, heavy metals, and human health. In: Brevik EC, Burgess LC, (eds). Soils and human health. Boca Raton: CRC Press; 2012. 59–82. [Google Scholar]
- 6.Chibuike GU, Obiora SC. Heavy Metal Polluted Soils: Effect on Plants and Bioremediation Methods. Appl Environ Soil Sci. 2014;2014:752708. 10.1155/2014/752708. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Bi X, Pan X, Zhou S. Soil Security Is Alarming in China’s Main Grain Producing Areas. Environ Sci Technol. 2013;47(14):7593–4. doi: 10.1021/es402545j [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Duan Q, Lee J, Liu Y, Chen H, Hu H. Distribution of Heavy Metal Pollution in Surface Soil Samples in China: A Graphical Review. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol. 2016;97(3):303–9. doi: 10.1007/s00128-016-1857-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Tchounwou PB, Yedjou CG, Patlolla AK. Heavy metal toxicity and the environment. In: Luch A, (ed). Molecular, clinical and environmental toxicology: environmental toxicology. Basel: Springer; 2012. 133–64. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Shonouda M, El-Samad L, Mokhamer E-H, Toto N. Use of Oxidative Stress and Genotoxic Biomarkers of Aquatic Beetles Anaceana globulus (Coleoptera: Hydrophilidae) as Biomonitors of Water Pollution. J Entomol. 2016;13:122–31. 10.3923/je.2016.122.131. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Armstrong N, Ramamoorthy M, Lyon D, Jones K, Duttaroy A. Mechanism of silver nanoparticles action on insect pigmentation reveals intervention of copper homeostasis. PLoS One. 2013;8(1):e53186. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0053186 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Mokhamer E-H, El-Samad LM, Elsayed WO, Shonouda M, Ali A. The ground beetle Blaps polycresta (Coleoptera:tenebrionidae) as Bioindicator of Heavy metals Soil Pollution. J Adv Biol. 2015;7:1153–60 [Google Scholar]
- 13.Kheirallah D. Gamma irradiation-induced spermatozoa anomalies in the Ground Beetle, Blaps Polycresta. Cell Tissue Res. 2016;16(3):5741–55 [Google Scholar]
- 14.Shonouda M, Osman W. Ultrastructural alterations in sperm formation of the beetle, Blaps polycresta (Coleoptera: Tenebrionidae) as a biomonitor of heavy metal soil pollution. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2018;25(8):7896–906. doi: 10.1007/s11356-017-1172-y [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Kheirallah DAM, El-Samad LM, Mokhamer EHM, Abdul-Aziz KK, Toto NAH. DNA damage and oogenesis anomalies in Pimelia latreillei (Coleoptera: Tenebrionidae) induced by heavy metals soil pollution. Toxicol Ind Health. 2019;35(11–12):688–702. doi: 10.1177/0748233719893200 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Condamine FL, Soldati L, Rasplus J-Y, Kergoat GJ. New insights on systematics and phylogenetics of Mediterranean Blaps species (Coleoptera: Tenebrionidae: Blaptini), assessed through morphology and dense taxon sampling. Systematic Entomology. 2011;36(2):340–61. 10.1111/j.1365-3113.2010.00567.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Crane M, Sildanchandra W, Kheir R, Callaghan A. Relationship between biomarker activity and developmental endpoints in Chironomus riparius Meigen exposed to an organophosphate insecticide. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2002;53(3):361–9. doi: 10.1016/s0147-6513(02)00038-6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Lai H, Su S, Guo H, Chen Z. Heavy Metals Contaminated Soils and Phytoremediation Strategies in Taiwan. In: Pascucci S, (ed). Soil Contamination. Croatia: Intech Open; 2011. 107–26. [Google Scholar]
- 19.Cogo AJ, Siqueira AF, Ramos AC, Cruz ZM, Silva AG. Utilização de enzimas do estresse oxidativo como biomarcadoras de impactos ambientais. Natureza on line. 2009;7(1):37–42 [Google Scholar]
- 20.Fontanetti CS, Nogarol LR, de Souza RB, Perez DG, Maziviero GT. Bioindicators and biomarkers in the assessment of soil toxicity. In: Pascuca S, (ed). Soil Contaminat. Croatia: Intech Open; 2011. 144–68. [Google Scholar]
- 21.Yeh SP, Sung TG, Chang CC, Cheng W, Kuo CM. Effects of an organophosphorus insecticide, trichlorfon, on hematological parameters of the giant freshwater prawn, Macrobrachium rosenbergii (de Man). Aquaculture (Amsterdam, Netherlands). 2005;243(1):383–92. 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2004.10.017. IND43711526 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Henderson L, Albertini S, Aardema M. Thresholds in genotoxicity responses. Mutat Res. 2000;464(1):123–8. doi: 10.1016/s1383-5718(99)00173-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Castro SV, Lobo CH, Figueiredo JR, Rodrigues APR. Proteínas de choque térmico hsp 70: estrutura e atuação em resposta ao estresse celular. Acta Veterinaria Brasilica. 2013;7(4):261–71 [Google Scholar]
- 24.Ju RT, Luo QQ, Gao L, Yang J, Li B. Identification of HSP70 gene in Corythucha ciliata and its expression profiles under laboratory and field thermal conditions. Cell Stress Chaperones. 2018;23(2):195–201. doi: 10.1007/s12192-017-0840-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Basha E, O’Neill H, Vierling E. Small heat shock proteins and α-crystallins: dynamic proteins with flexible functions. Trends Biochem Sci. 2012;37(3):106–17. doi: 10.1016/j.tibs.2011.11.005 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Augustyniak M, Tarnawska M, Babczyńska A, Augustyniak M. Hsp70 level in progeny of aging grasshoppers from variously polluted habitats and additionally exposed to zinc during diapause. J Insect Physiol. 2009;55(8):735–41. doi: 10.1016/j.jinsphys.2009.04.009 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Chapuis M-P, Simpson SJ, Blondin L, Sword GA. Taxa-specific heat shock proteins are over-expressed with crowding in the Australian plague locust. J Insect Physiol. 2011;57(11):1562–7. doi: 10.1016/j.jinsphys.2011.08.011 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Ilijin L, Mrdaković M, Vlahović M, Matić D, Gavrilović A, Mrkonja A, et al. Acetylcholinesterase and heat shock protein 70 response in larval brain tissue of Lymantria dispar L. (Lepidoptera, Limantriidae) upon chronic exposure to benzo(a)pyrene. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2017;24(25):20818–23. doi: 10.1007/s11356-017-9898-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Poiani A. Complexity of seminal fluid: A review. Behav Ecol Sociobiol. 2006;60(3):289–310. 10.1007/s00265-006-0178-0. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Avila FW, Sirot LK, LaFlamme BA, Rubinstein CD, Wolfner MF. Insect seminal fluid proteins: identification and function. Annu Rev Entomol. 2011;56:21–40. doi: 10.1146/annurev-ento-120709-144823 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Bolognesi C, Creus A, Ostrosky-Wegman P, Marcos R. Micronuclei and pesticide exposure. Mutagenesis. 2011;26(1):19–26. doi: 10.1093/mutage/geq070 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Kirsch-Volders M, Sofuni T, Aardema M, Albertini S, Eastmond D, Fenech M, et al. Report from the In Vitro Micronucleus Assay Working Group. Environ Mol Mutagen. 2000;35(3):167–72. doi: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Ahmadi M, Mozdarani H, Abd-Alla AMM. Comparative toxicity and micronuclei formation in Tribolium castaneum, Callosobruchus maculatus and Sitophilus oryzae exposed to high doses of gamma radiation. Appl Radiat Isot. 2015;101:135–40. doi: 10.1016/j.apradiso.2015.03.021 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Pigino G, Migliorini M, Paccagnini E, Bernini F. Localisation of heavy metals in the midgut epithelial cells of Xenillus tegeocranus (Hermann, 1804) (Acari: Oribatida). Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2006;64(3):257–63. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2005.12.012 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Kheirallah D, El-M Z, El-Gendy D. Impact of Cement Dust on the Testis of Tachyderma hispida (Forskal, 1775) (Coleoptra: Tenebrionidae), Inhabiting Mariout Region (Alexandria, Egypt). J Entomol. 2016;13:55–71. 10.3923/je.2016.55.71. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Xie G, Zou J, Zhao L, Wu M, Wang S, Zhang F, et al. Inhibitional effects of metal Zn2 on the reproduction of Aphis medicaginis and its predation by Harmonia axyridis. PLoS One. 2014;9(2):e87639. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0087639 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Kheirallah D, El-Samad L. Oogenesis Anomalies Induced by Heavy Metal Contamination in Two Tenebrionid Beetles (Blaps polycresta and Trachyderma hispida). Folia Biol. 2019;67(1):9–23. 10.3409/fb_67-1.02. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Dias G, Yotoko K, Gomes L, Lino-Neto J. Uncommon formation of two antiparallel sperm bundles per cyst in tenebrionid beetles (Coleoptera). Sci Nat. 2012;99:773–7. doi: 10.1007/s00114-012-0949-6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Dias G, Oliveira CM, Lino-Neto J. Sperm morphology and phylogeny of lagriids (Coleoptera, Tenebrionidae). Arthropod Struct Dev. 2013;42(5):379–84. doi: 10.1016/j.asd.2013.04.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Dias G, Oliveira CM, Lino-Neto J. Testicular and spermatogenic characteristics of Lagria villosa (Tenebrionidae: Lagriinae) with taxonomic inferences. Tissue Cell. 2013;45(4):227–30. doi: 10.1016/j.tice.2013.03.006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Xu D, Sun L, Liu S, Zhang L, Ru X, Zhao Y, et al. Molecular cloning of heat shock protein 10 (Hsp10) and 60 (Hsp60) cDNAs and their expression analysis under thermal stress in the sea cucumber Apostichopus japonicus. Comp Biochem Physiol B Biochem Mol Biol. 2014;171:49–57. doi: 10.1016/j.cbpb.2014.03.009 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Rodríguez-García MJ, Machado V, Galián J. Identification and characterisation of putative seminal fluid proteins from male reproductive tissue EST libraries in tiger beetles. BMC Genomics. 2015;16(1):391. doi: 10.1186/s12864-015-1619-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Cai Z, Chen J, Cheng J, Lin T. Overexpression of Three Heat Shock Proteins Protects Monochamus alternatus (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae) From Thermal Stress. Journal of Insect Science. 2017;17(6):113. 10.1093/jisesa/iex082. PMC5710657 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Fenech M. Cytokinesis-block micronucleus cytome assay. Nat Protoc. 2007;2(5):1084–104. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2007.77 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Bolognesi C, Knasmueller S, Nersesyan A, Thomas P, Fenech M. The HUMNxl scoring criteria for different cell types and nuclear anomalies in the buccal micronucleus cytome assay—an update and expanded photogallery. Mutat Res. 2013;753(2):100–13. doi: 10.1016/j.mrrev.2013.07.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Benvindo-Souza M, Borges RE, Pacheco SM, Santos LRS. Genotoxicological analyses of insectivorous bats (Mammalia: Chiroptera) in central Brazil: The oral epithelium as an indicator of environmental quality. Environ Pollut. 2019;245:504–9. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2018.11.015 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Kirkpatrick LA, Feeney BC. A simple guide to IBM SPSS statistics for version 20.0. Belmont, Calif: Wadsworth, Cengage Learning; 2013. [Google Scholar]
- 48.El-Samad LM, Radwan EH, Bakr NR. Aquatic beetles Cercyon unipunctatus as bioindicators of pollution in Lake Edku and Mariut, Egypt. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2019;26(7):6557–64 doi: 10.1007/s11356-018-4016-5 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Kheirallah DA, El-Samad LM. Isoenzymes and protein polymorphism in Blaps polycresta and Trachyderma hispida (Forsskål, 1775) (Coleoptera: Tenebrionidae) as biomarkers for ceramic industrial pollution. Environ Monit Assess. 2019;191(6):372. doi: 10.1007/s10661-019-7517-x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Kheirallah DA. Ultrastructure biomarker in Anisops sardeus (Heteroptera Notonectidae) for the assessment and monitoring of Water Quality of Al-Mahmoudia Canal, Western Part of Nile Delta, Egypt. J Biosci Appl Res. 2015;1(6):326–34 [Google Scholar]
- 51.Azam I, Afsheen S, Zia A, Javed M, Saeed R, Sarwar MK, et al. Evaluating Insects as Bioindicators of Heavy Metal Contamination and Accumulation near Industrial Area of Gujrat, Pakistan. Biomed Res Int. 2015;2015:942751. doi: 10.1155/2015/942751 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Agrama AA, El-Sayed EA. Assessing and mapping water quality (case study: Western Delta-Egypt). Int Water Technol J. 2013;3(3):158–69 [Google Scholar]
- 53.Qin W, Tyshenko MG, Wu BS, Virginia K, Walker R. Cloning and characterization of a member of the hsp70 gene family from Locusta migratoria, a highly thermotolerant insect. Cell Stress Chaperones.8(2):144–52 doi: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Dou W, Tian Y, Liu H, Shi Y, Smagghe G, Wang JJ. Characteristics of six small heat shock protein genes from Bactrocera dorsalis: Diverse expression under conditions of thermal stress and normal growth. Comp Biochem Physiol B Biochem Mol Biol. 2017;213:8–16. doi: 10.1016/j.cbpb.2017.07.005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Cheng J, Wang CY, Lyu ZH, Chen JX, Lin T. Identification and characterization of the catalase gene involved in resistance to thermal stress in Heortia vitessoides using RNA interference. J Therm Biol. 2018;78:114–21. doi: 10.1016/j.jtherbio.2018.09.008 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Shu Y, Du Y, Wang J. Molecular characterization and expression patterns of Spodoptera litura heat shock protein 70/90, and their response to zinc stress. Comp Biochem Physiol A Mol Integr Physiol. 2011;158(1):102–10. doi: 10.1016/j.cbpa.2010.09.006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Zhao L, Becnel JJ, Clark GG, Linthicum KJ, Chen J, Jin X. Identification and expression profile of multiple genes in response to magnesium exposure in Culex quinquefasciatus larvae. J Med Entomol. 2010;47(6):1053–61. doi: 10.1603/me10028 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Sun Y, Sheng Y, Bai L, Zhang Y, Xiao Y, Xiao L, et al. Characterizing heat shock protein 90 gene of Apolygus lucorum (Meyer-Dür) and its expression in response to different temperature and pesticide stresses. Cell Stress Chaperones. 2014;19(5):725–39. doi: 10.1007/s12192-014-0500-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Sun Y, Zhao J, Sheng Y, Xiao YF, Zhang YJ, Bai LX, et al. Identification of heat shock cognate protein 70 gene (Alhsc70) of Apolygus lucorum and its expression in response to different temperature and pesticide stresses. Insect Sci. 2016;23(1):37–49. doi: 10.1111/1744-7917.12193 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Kamel A, Mahmoud S. Molecular characterisation and expression of heat shock protein gene (HSP70) in Tribolium castaneum adults under different environmental stressors. Afr Entomol. 2018;26(2):495–506 [Google Scholar]
- 61.Barnes JA, Collins BW, Dix DJ, Allen JW. Effects of heat shock protein 70 (Hsp70) on arsenite-induced genotoxicity. Environ Mol Mutagen. 2002;40(4):236–42. doi: 10.1002/em.10116 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Doğanlar ZB, Doğanlar O, Tabakçıoğlu K. Genotoxic Effects of Heavy Metal Mixture in Drosophila melanogaster: Expressions of Heat Shock Proteins, RAPD Profiles and Mitochondrial DNA Sequence. Water Air Soil Pollut. 2014;225(9):2104. 10.1007/s11270-014-2104-9. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Braeckman B, Raes H, Van Hoye D. Heavy-metal toxicity in an insect cell line. Effects of cadmium chloride, mercuric chloride and methylmercuric chloride on cell viability and proliferation in Aedes albopictus cells. Cell Biol Toxicol. 1997;13(6):389–97. doi: 10.1023/a:1007425925726 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Braeckman B, Simoens C, Rzeznik U, Raes H. Effect of sublethal doses of cadmium, inorganic mercury and methylmercury on the cell morphology of an insect cell line (Aedes albopictus, C6/36). Cell Biol Int. 1997;21(12):823–32. doi: 10.1006/cbir.1998.0194 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Kafel A, Nowak A, Bembenek J, Szczygieł J, Nakonieczny M, Swiergosz-Kowalewska R. The localisation of HSP70 and oxidative stress indices in heads of Spodoptera exigua larvae in a cadmium-exposed population. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2012;78:22–7. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2011.10.024 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Joshi A, Tiwari PK. Chromosomal responses of blowfly Lucilia cuprina to heat and heavy metal stress. Genetica. 2000;109(3):211–8. doi: 10.1023/a:1017541901690 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Clark NL, Aagaard JE, Swanson WJ. Evolution of reproductive proteins from animals and plants. Reproduction. 2006;131(1):11–22. doi: 10.1530/rep.1.00357 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Andrés JA, Maroja LS, Harrison RG. Searching for candidate speciation genes using a proteomic approach: seminal proteins in field crickets. Proc Biol Sci. 2008;275(1646):1975–83. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2008.0423 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.South A, Sirot LK, Lewis SM. Identification of predicted seminal fluid proteins in Tribolium castaneum. Insect Mol Biol. 2011;20(4):447–56. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2583.2011.01083.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Almeida FC, DeSalle R. Orthology, Function and Evolution of Accessory Gland Proteins in the <em>Drosophila repleta</em> Group. Genetics. 2009;181(1):235–45. doi: 10.1534/genetics.108.096263 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Baer B, Heazlewood JL, Taylor NL, Eubel H, Millar AH. The seminal fluid proteome of the honeybee Apis mellifera. Proteomics. 2009;9(8):2085–97. doi: 10.1002/pmic.200800708 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Bairati A. Structure and ultrastructure of the male reproductive system in drosophila melanogaster meig. Ital J Zool (Modena). 1968;2(3):105–82. 10.1080/00269786.1968.10736126. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Chapman T, Davies SJ. Functions and analysis of the seminal fluid proteins of male Drosophila melanogaster fruit flies. Peptides. 2004;25(9):1477–90. doi: 10.1016/j.peptides.2003.10.023 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Gupta SC, Siddique HR, Mathur N, Mishra RK, Saxena DK, Chowdhuri DK. Adverse effect of organophosphate compounds, dichlorvos and chlorpyrifos in the reproductive tissues of transgenic Drosophila melanogaster: 70kDa heat shock protein as a marker of cellular damage. Toxicology. 2007;238(1):1–14. doi: 10.1016/j.tox.2007.05.017 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Bombail V, Aw D, Gordon E, Batty J. Application of the comet and micronucleus assays to butterfish (Pholis gunnellus) erythrocytes from the Firth of Forth, Scotland. Chemosphere. 2001;44(3):383–92. doi: 10.1016/s0045-6535(00)00300-3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Hartmann A, Elhajouji A, Kiskinis E, Poetter F, Martus H, Fjällman A, et al. Use of the alkaline comet assay for industrial genotoxicity screening: comparative investigation with the micronucleus test. Food Chem Toxicol. 2001;39(8):843–58. doi: 10.1016/s0278-6915(01)00031-x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Klobucar GI, Pavlica M, Erben R, Papes D. Application of the micronucleus and comet assays to mussel Dreissena polymorpha haemocytes for genotoxicity monitoring of freshwater environments. Aquat Toxicol. 2003;64(1):15–23. doi: 10.1016/s0166-445x(03)00009-2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Şekeroğlu V, Atlı Şekeroğlu Z. Micronucleus test for determining genotoxic damage. Turk Bulle Hygi Exp Bio. 2011;68(4):241–52. 10.5505/TurkHijyen.2011.06977. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Rencuzogullari E, Topaktaş M. Chromosomal Aberrations in Cultured Human Lymphocytes Treated with the Mixtures of Carbosulfan, Ethyl Carbamate and Ethyl Methanesulfonate. CYTOLOGIA. 2000;65:83–92. 10.1508/cytologia.65.83. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Offer T, Bhagat A, Lal A, Atamna W, Singer ST, Vichinsky EP, et al. Measuring chromosome breaks in patients with thalassemia. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2005;1054:439–44. doi: 10.1196/annals.1345.050 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Evans HJ. Historical perspectives on the development of the in vitro micronucleus test: a personal view. Mutat Res. 1997;392(1–2):5–10. doi: 10.1016/s0165-1218(97)00040-2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Miller B, Albertini S, Locher F, Thybaud V, Lorge E. Comparative evaluation of the in vitro micronucleus test and the in vitro chromosome aberration test: industrial experience. Mutat Res. 1997;392(1–2):45–59, 187–208. doi: 10.1016/s0165-1218(97)00044-x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.Noditi M, Toro L. Low dose of ionizing radiation exposure monitoring by micronucleus test Analele Inst. de Sãnãtate PublicãTimisoara. 2000;7(16):279–88 [Google Scholar]
- 84.Dias G, Lino-Neto J, Mercati D, Dallai R. The sperm ultrastructure and spermiogenesis of Tribolium castaneum (Coleoptera: Tenebrionidae) with evidence of cyst degeneration. Micron. 2015;73:21–7. doi: 10.1016/j.micron.2015.03.003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85.Dallai R. Overview on spermatogenesis and sperm structure of Hexapoda. Arthropod Struct Dev. 2014;43(4):257–90. doi: 10.1016/j.asd.2014.04.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86.Bertin G, Averbeck D. Cadmium: cellular effects, modifications of biomolecules, modulation of DNA repair and genotoxic consequences (a review). Biochimie. 2006;88(11):1549–59. doi: 10.1016/j.biochi.2006.10.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87.Venter C, Oberholzer HM, Cummings FR, Bester MJ. Effects of metals cadmium and chromium alone and in combination on the liver and kidney tissue of male Spraque-Dawley rats: An ultrastructural and electron-energy-loss spectroscopy investigation. Microsc Res Tech. 2017;80(8):878–88. doi: 10.1002/jemt.22877 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88.Dallai R, Carapelli A, Nardi F, Fanciulli PP, Lupetti P, Afzelius BA, et al. Sperm structure and spermiogenesis in Coletinia sp. (Nicoletiidae, Zygentoma, Insecta) with a comparative analysis of sperm structure in Zygentoma. Tissue Cell. 2004;36(4):233–44. doi: 10.1016/j.tice.2004.03.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89.Au DW, Reunov AA, Wu RS. Reproductive impairment of sea urchin upon chronic exposure to cadmium. Part II: Effects on sperm development. Environ Pollut. 2001;111(1):11–20. doi: 10.1016/s0269-7491(00)00036-1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90.Venter C. An in ovo investigation of the cellular effects of the heavy metals cadmium and chromium alone and in combination. Faculty of Health Sciences: University of Pretoria; 2014. [Google Scholar]
- 91.Wolf KW. The formation of accessory tubules in spermatids of the red firebug, Pyrrhocoris apterus (Hemiptera: Pyrrhocoridae). Eur J Entomol. 2013;94(2):263–70 [Google Scholar]
- 92.Hsiao W, Schlegel PN. Assessment of the male partner. In: Kovacs G, (ed). The Subfertility handbook, A Clinician’s Guide. 2nd ed. United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press; 2011. 43–57. [Google Scholar]
- 93.Lauverjat S, Ballan-Dufrancais C, Wegnez M. Detoxification of cadmium. Ultrastructural study and electron-probe microanalysis of the midgut in a cadmium-resistant strain of Drosophila melanogaster. Biol Met. 1989;2(2):97–107. doi: 10.1007/BF01129208 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 94.Vandenbulcke F, Grelle C, Fabre MC, Descamps M. Ultrastructural and autometallographic studies of the nephrocytes of Lithobius forficatus L. (Myriapoda, Chilopoda): role in detoxification of cadmium and lead. Int J Insect Morphol Embryol. 1998;27(2):111–20. 10.1016/S0020-7322(98)00034-8. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 95.Umamaheswari P. Studies on the impact of seed extract of ficus semicordata on certain selected tissue in the adult male Sphaerodema rusticum (Heteroptera: Belostomatidae) in relation to reproduction: Annamalai University; 2005. [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
All relevant data are within the paper.