Skip to main content
Critical Care logoLink to Critical Care
. 2021 Jun 24;25:218. doi: 10.1186/s13054-021-03642-1

Psychological evaluation and support in COVID-19 critically ill patients: a feasibility study

Renaud Prével 1,2,, Julien Coelho 3, Arthur Orieux 1, Pierre Philip 3,4, Didier Gruson 1,2, Stéphanie Bioulac 3,4
PMCID: PMC8223189  PMID: 34167549

To the Editor,

About 20% of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) survivors suffer from anxiety, depression or post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) [1] with a negative impact on long-term quality of life [2]. Higher rates—38.8%—of psychological sequelae were described in Middle East and Severe Acute Respiratory Syndromes’ outbreaks [3]. Recent data described about 40 to 48% of COVID-19 critically ill patients with post-intensive care disorder or acute stress disorder [4, 5]. The aim of this pilot study is to assess the feasibility of an early psychological evaluation and sustained support in COVID-19 patients admitted to intensive care unit (ICU) and describe their mental health outcomes during a 6-month follow-up. Every COVID-19 survivor was evaluated by a trained clinician psychologist in ICU at invasive ventilation weaning or when conversation was feasible for patients receiving high-flow oxygen. Psychological support was performed as needed according to standard care. Clinician psychologists met the patient and identified if psychological distress symptoms were present (i.e. anxious or depressive symptoms, sleep disorder, …). They met the patient as often as required for supportive interventions (to help patients to speak about their emotions and/or fears) and also explained to the patients the care they were given while being sedated. Clinician psychologists systematically met patients or called them by phone as preferred by the patient at day 7, week 6, 12 and 24 after ICU discharge and standardized evaluation occurred at those time points with psychometric evaluation (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Checklist for DSM-5 (PCL-5) and Insomnia Severity Index (ISI)). Univariate linear mixed regression models were used to identify predictors of mental health in follow-up. Thirty-seven patients were included (81% of men, mean age of 59 (± 11) from March to June, 2020 (Table 1). Three quarters of them (28/37) were intubated for an average length of 40 days (± 7). At discharge from hospital, 20/34 (59%) of them returned home while 14/34 (41%) went to rehabilitation centre. At day 7, 32 patients were evaluated: 5/32 (16%) had significant depression symptoms, 4/32 (13%) significant insomnia symptoms and 3/32 (9%) significant anxiety symptoms and at week 6, they were, respectively, 2/17 (12%), 3/17 (18%) and 2/17 (12%). At week 12, they were, respectively, 5/24 (21%), 3/22 (14%), 3/23 (13%), and 2/25 (8%) to have significant depression, insomnia, anxiety or PTSD symptoms and at week 24, respectively, 2/19 (11%), 2/19 (11%), 4/18 (22%), and 1/18 (6%) (Table 1). Insomnia and anxiety scores did not vary over time (Kruskal–Wallis, respectively, p = 0.76 and p = 0.95), whereas depression scores decreased at week 24 (Kruskal–Wallis, p = 0.04). Cumulative dose of midazolam, cumulative dose of clonidine and length of ICU stay were associated with insomnia in follow-up (respectively regression coefficient β: 1.14 [0.44–2.39], p = 0.007, β: 1.29 [0.24; 2.36], p = 0.02 and β: 1.02 [0.14; 1.90], p = 0.025) (Table 2). Cumulative dose of clonidine was associated with depression in follow-up (β: 0.57 [0.11; 1.03], p = 0.019). Severity of ARDS could be associated with occurrence of PTSD in follow-up despite non-statistical significance (p = 0.059) (Table 2). In conclusion, this study shows that, even in the context of a pandemic situation, it is possible to provide an early and sustained psychological support in critically ill patients. We report lower rates of post-intensive care psychological sequelae than what has previously been reported [4, 5] but the absence of control group prevent from drawing firm conclusions about the impact of psychological intervention. Nevertheless, these results strongly encourage future large randomized controlled studies to assess the efficacy of early psychological evaluation and personalized support in critically ill COVID-19 patients.

Table 1.

COVID-19 critically ill patients’ socio-demographic, comorbidities and care characteristics

Variables n (%) Mean ± SD Median [IQR]

Gender

 Women

 Men

37 (100.0%)

 7 (18.9%)

 30 (81.1%)

Age 37 (100.0%) 58.8 ± 11.3 59.4 [53.4–63.7]

History of:

 Sleep disorders

 Psychiatric consultations

 On-going depression

 Past trauma or PTSD

 Past depression

 Drug addiction (cannabis)

History of:

 Tobacco use

 COPD

 Asthma

 Chronic hypertension

 Diabetes

 Chronic heart condition

 Chronic coronary disease

 Chronic kidney disease

 Pharmacological treatment

 ACEi

 Diuretics

 Proton pump inhibitor

 Beta-blockers

 Statins

 Metformin

 Fibrates

 Benzodiazepine

 Serotonin reuptake inhibitor

 ARB

 Aspirin

 Lithium

 Anticoagulant

 Cordarone

 None

33 (89.9%)

 6 (18.2%)

 5 (14.7%)

 4 (12.2%)

 4 (12.2%)

 2 (6.1%)

 1 (3.0%)

37 (100.0%)

 13 (35.1%)

 6 (16.2%)

 3 (8.1%)

 22 (59.5%)

 8 (21.6%)

 6 (16.2%)

 5 (13.5%)

 2 (5.4%)

 37 (100.0%)

 12 (32.4%)

 11 (29.7%)

 11 (29.7%)

 9 (24.3%)

 7 (18.1%)

 6 (16.2%)

 5 (13.5%)

 5 (13.5%)

 4 (10.8%)

 3 (8.1%)

 3 (8.1%)

 2 (5.4%)

 2 (5.4%)

 1 (2.7)

 7 (18.1%)

Duration of symptoms before admission to ICU (days) 37 (100.0%) 8.0 ± 2.6 8 [7–9]

Clinical respiratory distress:

 Yes

 No

32 (86.5%)

 5 (15.6%)

 27 (84.4%)

Thromboembolic event:

 Yes

 No

37 (100.0%)

 9 (24.3%)

 28 (75.7%)

Acute respiratory distress syndrome

 Mild

 Moderate

 Severe

37 (100.0%)

 11 (29.7%)

 17 (50.0%)

 9 (24.3%)

Neutrophils/lymphocytes ratio

 Less than 3.7

 More than 3.7

37 (100.0%)

 6 (16.2%)

 31 (83.8%)

C-reactive protein (mg/L)

Ferritin (µg/L)

Lactate Dehydrogenase (UI/L)

Albumin (g/L)

Fibrinogen (g/L)

D-dimers (mg/L)

37 (100.0%)

33 (89.9%)

32 (86.5%)

35 (94.6%)

33 (89.9%)

32 (86.5%)

152 ± 105

2,206 ± 2,043

468 ± 165

20 ± 5

8.5 ± 1.3

5,535 ± 10,478

140 [66–202]

1,470 [941–3,258]

450 [367–537]

21 [16–24]

[7.3–9.8]

1,554 [802–5,084]

Oro-tracheal intubation:

 Yes

 No

37 (100.0%)

 28 (75.7%)

 9 (24.3%)

Duration of intubation (days) 28 (100.0%) 39.9 ± 6.6 39 [38–40]
Duration of sedation (days) 28 (100.0%) 19.0 ± 15.2 14 [9–22]
Cumulative dose of midazolam (mg) 24 (85.7%) 1731 ± 2115 889 [364–2.188]
Cumulative dose of propofol (mg) 22 (78.6%) 23.560 ± 27.083 12.392 [5.060–34.264]
Cumulative dose of morphine (mg) 22 (78.6%) 1459 ± 2491 882 [230– 1.463]
Cumulative dose of clonidine (mg) 22 (78.6%) 2.44 ± 2.18 1.81 [0.85–3.2]
Cumulative dose of levomepromazine (mg) 13 (46.4%) 267 ± 350 173 [0–287]

Use of prone positioning

 Yes

 No

28 (100%)

 17 (60.7%)

 11 (39.3%)

Use of nitrogen monoxide

 Yes

 No

37 (100.0%)

 3 (8.1%)

 24 (91.9%)

Use of norepinephrine

 Yes

 No

37 (100.0%)

 26 (70.3%)

 11 (29.7%)

Maximal dose of norepinephrine (µg/kg/min) 22 (84.6%) 0.30 ± 0.31 0.17 [0.11–0.41]
Cumulative dose of norepinephrine (mg) 23 (88.5%) 85.9 ± 143.4 28.0 [9.5–94.5]

Place of follow-up

 Home

 Rehabilitation center

34 (91.9%)

 20 (58.8%)

 14 (41.2%)

Psychometric evaluation at day 7

 Significant depression

 Significant insomnia

 Significant anxiety

32 (86.5%)

 5 (15.6%)

 4 (12.5%)

 3 (9.4%)

Psychometric evaluation at week 6

 Significant depression

 Significant insomnia

 Significant anxiety

17 (45.9%)

 2 (11.8%)

 3 (17.7%)

 2 (11.8%)

Psychometric evaluation at week 12

 Significant depression

 Significant insomnia

 Significant anxiety

 Significant PTSD symptoms

24 (64.9%)

 5 (20.8%)

22 (59.5%)

 3 (13.6%)

23 (62.2%)

 3 (13.0%)

25 (67.6%)

 2 (8.0%)

Psychometric evaluation at week 24

 Significant depression

 Significant insomnia

 Significant anxiety

 Significant PTSD symptoms

19 (51.4%)

 2 (10.5%)

 2 (10.5%)

18 (48.6%)

 4 (22.2%)

 1 (5.6%)

ACEi angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor, ARB angiotensin II receptor blocker, COPD chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, ICU intensive care unit PTSD post-traumatic stress disorder

Table 2.

Univariate mixed model with random intercept of factors associated with the occurrence of psychological sequelae during follow-up

β [95%] CI p value
Predicting insomnia in follow-up
History of sleep disorders 4.24 [− 0.54;9.08] 0.082
Acute respiratory distress syndrome 0.099
 Mild Reference Reference
 Moderate 1.32 [− 2.46;5.09]
 Severe 4.87 [0.35;9.34]
Cumulative dose of morphine (for 1000 units) 0.74 [− 0.06;1.53] 0.069
Cumulative dose of midazolam (for 100 units) 1.41 [0.44;2.39] 0.007
Cumulative dose of clonidine (for 1 unit) 1.29 [0.24;2.36] 0.020
Maximal dose of norepinephrine − 2.78 [− 11.5;5.98] 0.520
Length of ICU stay (for 10 days) 1.02 [0.14;1.90] 0.025
Predicting anxiety in follow-up
History of sleep disorders 0.98 [− 1.87;3.78] 0.488
Acute respiratory distress syndrome 0.206
 Mild Reference Reference
 Moderate 0.75 [− 1.39;2.94]
 Severe 2.36 [− 0.30;4.97]
Cumulative dose of morphine (for 1000 units) 0.15 [− 0.45;0.76] 0.612
Cumulative dose of midazolam (for 100 units) 0.02 [− 0.12;0.07] 0.537
Cumulative dose of clonidine (for 1 unit) 0.43 [− 0.12;0.98] 0.118
Maximal dose of norepinephrine − 2.61 [− 7.64;2.44] 0.301
Length of ICU stay (for 10 days) 0.46 [− 0.07;0.99] 0.091
Predicting depression in follow-up
History of sleep disorders 1.19 [− 2.09;4.41] 0.464
Acute respiratory distress syndrome 0.823
 Mild Reference Reference
 Moderate 0.75 [− 1.89;3.42]
 Severe 0.81 [− 2.43;3.99]
Cumulative dose of morphine (for 1000 units) 0.05 [− 0.60;0.69] 0.883
Cumulative dose of midazolam (for 100 units) 0.02 [− 0.05;0.09] 0.588
Cumulative dose of clonidine (for 1 unit) 0.57 [0.11;1.03] 0.019
Maximal dose of norepinephrine − 2.82 [− 8.11;2.54] 0.292
Length of ICU stay (for 10 days) 0.39 [− 0.23;1.01] 0.208
Predicting post-traumatic stress disorder in follow-up
History of sleep disorders 8.36 [− 1.60;18.4] 0.100
Acute respiratory distress syndrome 0.059
 Mild Reference Reference
 Moderate 0.55 [− 7.13;8.17]
 Severe 9.81 [1.06;18.5]
Cumulative dose of morphine (for 1000 units) 0.21 [− 1.77;2.17] 0.826
Cumulative dose of midazolam (for 100 units) 0.16 [− 0.04;0.35] 0.103
Cumulative dose of clonidine (for 1 unit) 0.93 [− 1.14;3.01] 0.363
Maximal dose of norepinephrine 5.71 [− 9.65;21.0] 0.449
Length of ICU stay (for 10 days) 1.54 [− 0.37;3.42] 0.109

Bold values indicate statistically significant association

β: regression coefficient of the linear mixed model with random intercept

CI confidence interval, ICU intensive care unit

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Audrey Fontaine, Aurélie Mollar, Anouk Chignac, Sarah Gimenez and Flore Mathias for their participation in psychological support and evaluation. We also thank also Cécile Klochendler, Cedric Valtat, Muriel Bascarisse, Aurélien Boiseau for research organization, data collection and monitoring.

Abbreviations

ARDS

Acute respiratory distress syndrome

HADS

Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale

ICU

Intensive care unit

ISI

Insomnia Severity Index

PCL-5

Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Checklist for DSM-5

PTSD

Post-traumatic stress disorder

Authors' contributions

RP, DG, SB designed the study and wrote the manuscript. AO collected patients’ data. JC performed statistical analysis. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Funding

No funding.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Informed consent for each patient was obtained as required by French ethics law and research was performed according to The Code of Ethics of the World Medical Association (Declaration of Helsinki).

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no competing interests.

Footnotes

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

  • 1.Righy C, Rosa RG, da Silva RTA, Kochhann R, Migliavaca CB, Robinson CC, et al. Prevalence of post-traumatic stress disorder symptoms in adult critical care survivors: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Crit Care. 2019;23:213. doi: 10.1186/s13054-019-2489-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Parker AM, Sricharoenchai T, Raparla S, Schneck KW, Bienvenu OJ, Needham DM. Posttraumatic stress disorder in critical illness survivors: a meta-analysis. Crit Care Med. 2015;43:1121–1129. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000000882. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Ahmed H, Patel K, Greenwood DC, Halpin S, Lewthwaite P, Salawu A, et al. Long-term clinical outcomes in survivors of severe acute respiratory syndrome and Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus outbreaks after hospitalisation or ICU admission: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Rehabil Med. 2020;52:jrm00063. doi: 10.2340/16501977-2694. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Mongodi S, Salve G, Tavazzi G, Politi P, Mojoli F, COVID-19 Post-ICU team, et al. High prevalence of acute stress disorder and persisting symptoms in ICU survivors after COVID-19. Intensive Care Med. 2021 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 5.Martillo M, Dangayach N, Tabacof L, Spielman LA, Dams-O’Connor K, Chan CC, et al. Postintensive Care Syndrome in survivors of critical illness related to Coronavirus Disease 2019: cohort study from a New York City critical care recovery clinic. Crit Care Med. 2021 [DOI] [PubMed]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

The datasets analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.


Articles from Critical Care are provided here courtesy of BMC

RESOURCES