Skip to main content
Microbiology Resource Announcements logoLink to Microbiology Resource Announcements
. 2021 Jun 24;10(25):e00378-21. doi: 10.1128/MRA.00378-21

Complete Genome Sequences of Six Staphylococcus pseudintermedius Strains from Dogs with Superficial Pyoderma in Georgia, USA

Maurice Byukusenge a, Frane Banovic b, Lingling Li c, Suresh V Kuchipudi c,d, Bhushan M Jayarao c, Cynthia K Watson e, Hemant K Naikare e,
Editor: Julia A Marescaf
PMCID: PMC8223811  PMID: 34165335

ABSTRACT

Staphylococcus pseudintermedius is a pathogen of veterinary importance, as it is the major causative agent of superficial pyoderma in dogs. We present the complete genome sequences of six strains of S. pseudintermedius derived from dogs affected with epidermal collarettes and superficial bacterial folliculitis, which are two variants of superficial pyoderma.

ANNOUNCEMENT

Superficial pyoderma is a common diagnosis in the dog, with a prevalence of up to 10% in all dogs presented in private practices (1, 2). Staphylococcus pseudintermedius is the principal pathogen for canine superficial pyoderma (3). Pathogenic S. pseudintermedius strains are underrepresented in genomic databases such as GenBank compared to human pathogens. Here, we present the complete genome sequences of six strains of S. pseudintermedius, which were isolated from dogs in Georgia, USA, suffering from two clinical variants of superficial pyoderma, epidermal collarettes (strains 9261-1A, 11304-1A, 11304-2A, 11304-3A, and 11306-1A) and superficial bacterial folliculitis (strain 11306-4A). Two plasmids were assembled from the sequencing data from a single strain (11304-3A). These complete genome sequences will improve researchers’ capacity for using genomic data for an in-depth understanding of the mechanisms underlying the pathogenesis of S. pseudintermedius-mediated superficial pyoderma clinical variants.

Swab samples were collected from dogs affected with superficial pyoderma at the Veterinary Medical Center of the College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Georgia. The Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) of the University of Georgia (CR-459) approved the study protocol. The sample swabs were inoculated onto blood agar (tryptic soy agar with 5% sheep blood; Thermo Fisher Scientific) and incubated for 24 h at 37 ± 2°C in an aerobic incubator. Preliminary identification of isolated colonies was made using conventional methods (i.e., positive catalase test, positive coagulase test) and the Gram-positive organism bacterial auto-identification system (Sensititre; Thermo Fisher Scientific) according to the manufacturer’s procedure. The species identification of S. pseudintermedius was performed using the multiplex PCR method for species identification of coagulase-positive staphylococci using the bacterial DNA from single bacterial colonies (4). Pure isolated colonies of S. pseudintermedius strains isolated from canine superficial pyoderma were transported to the Penn State Animal Diagnostic Laboratory for sequencing. The single isolated colonies were subcultured in brain heart infusion (BHI) broth (BD) and incubated overnight at 37°C. DNA extraction from each colony was done using the GenFind V2 DNA extraction kit (Beckman Coulter) following the manufacturer’s instructions.

Two platforms were used for sequencing; Illumina was utilized to generate short paired-end reads, whereas long reads for closing the gaps in the genomic sequences were generated with the MinION device from Oxford Nanopore Technologies (ONT). The Illumina Nextera DNA Flex library prep kit was used to generate the libraries for sequencing with Illumina MiniSeq. The one-dimensional (1D) native barcoding genomic DNA protocol (EXP-NBD104 and SQK-LSK109; ONT) was used to generate the libraries for sequencing with the MinION device. The quality of the short reads (150 bp) generated with Illumina MiniSeq was assessed using FastQC v0.11.9 (5). Base-calling and demultiplexing of reads from the MinION data were performed using MinKNOW v20.10 and EPI2ME v2020.2.10, respectively; both software platforms are downloadable from the ONT community website. Filtlong v0.2.0 (6) was used for quality control by removing short reads and trimming off the regions of the lowest quality from each read. A de novo hybrid assembly technique with Unicycler v0.4.8 (7) was utilized with default options to generate complete circular chromosomes for all six isolates and two plasmids for one isolate. The sequence overlap identification and trimming and the genome rotation are among Unicycler’s default options. The circular replicons are rotated to start with dnaA and repA genes for chromosomes and plasmids, respectively. The genome sequences were submitted to GenBank and annotated using the NCBI Prokaryotic Genome Annotation Pipeline (PGAP) (8). The metric sequencing data and genome assembly are provided in Table 1.

TABLE 1.

Metrics for sequence data and accession numbers of six genomes of S. pseudintermedius from Georgia

Strain Replicon type Genome size (bp) GC content (%) Total no. of genes GenBank accession no. BioSample accession no. Data for Illumina sequencing
Data for Oxford Nanopore sequencing
Total reads (bp) Avg read length (bp) Avg coverage (x) Total reads (bp) N50 (bp) Avg coverage (x)
SP_11304-1A Chromosome 2,558,081 37.7 2,445 CP065925.1 SRS7863626 2,046,244 147.2 118 37,415 5,423 70
SP_11304-2A Chromosome 2,605,960 37.7 2,475 CP065924.1 SRS7863627 2,233,820 147.9 127 55,623 5,211 100
SP_11304-3A Chromosome 2,610,514 37.6 2,496 CP065921.1 SRS7863628 2,199,510 147.6 123 47,417 6,456 99
Plasmid 1 15,734 28.7 17 CP065922.1
Plasmid 2 3,348 31.2 3 CP065923.1
SP_11306-1A Chromosome 2,605,463 37.6 2,468 CP065920.1 SRS7863629 2,341,202 147.8 133 58,587 4,824 100
SP_11306-4A Chromosome 2,539,776 37.8 2,394 CP065919.1 SRS7863625 2,052,768 149.9 120 28,339 9,466 102
SP_9261-1A Chromosome 2,671,923 37.5 2,530 CP065926.1 SRS7863624 1,467,696 147.6 81 61,446 4,477 97

Data availability.

The data were deposited in the NCBI’s databases under the BioProject accession no. PRJNA683859. The complete genomes and the raw reads were deposited in the GenBank and SRA databases, respectively. The accession numbers are provided in Table 1.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We thank Tara Denley, Samantha Watson, and Michaela Austel for help with the collection of samples from dogs.

Contributor Information

Hemant K. Naikare, Email: naikare@uga.edu.

Julia A. Maresca, University of Delaware

REFERENCES

  • 1.Lund EM, Armstrong PJ, Kirk CA, Kolar LM, Klausner JS. 1999. Health status and population characteristics of dogs and cats examined at private veterinary practices in the United States. J Am Vet Med Assoc 214:1336–1341. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Hill PB, Lo A, Eden C.aN, Huntley S, Morey V, Ramsey S, Richardson C, Smith DJ, Sutton C, Taylor MD, Thorpe E, Tidmarsh R, Williams V. 2006. Survey of the prevalence, diagnosis and treatment of dermatological conditions in small animals in general practice. Vet Rec 158:533–539. doi: 10.1136/vr.158.16.533. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Older CE, Rodrigues Hoffmann A, Hoover K, Banovic F. 2020. Characterization of cutaneous bacterial microbiota from superficial pyoderma forms in atopic dogs. Pathogens 9:638. doi: 10.3390/pathogens9080638. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Sasaki T, Tsubakishita S, Tanaka Y, Sakusabe A, Ohtsuka M, Hirotaki S, Kawakami T, Fukata T, Hiramatsu K. 2010. Multiplex-PCR method for species identification of coagulase-positive staphylococci. J Clin Microbiol 48:765–769. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01232-09. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Andrews S. 2010. FastQC: a quality control tool for high throughput sequence data. https://www.bioinformatics.babraham.ac.uk/projects/fastqc/.
  • 6.Wick R. 2017. Filtlong. C++. https://github.com/rrwick/Filtlong.
  • 7.Wick RR, Judd LM, Gorrie CL, Holt KE. 2017. Unicycler: resolving bacterial genome assemblies from short and long sequencing reads. PLoS Comput Biol 13:e1005595. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005595. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Tatusova T, DiCuccio M, Badretdin A, Chetvernin V, Nawrocki EP, Zaslavsky L, Lomsadze A, Pruitt KD, Borodovsky M, Ostell J. 2016. NCBI Prokaryotic Genome Annotation Pipeline. Nucleic Acids Res 44:6614–6624. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkw569. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

The data were deposited in the NCBI’s databases under the BioProject accession no. PRJNA683859. The complete genomes and the raw reads were deposited in the GenBank and SRA databases, respectively. The accession numbers are provided in Table 1.


Articles from Microbiology Resource Announcements are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES